Next Article in Journal
Metronidazole Activation by a Deeply Entangled Dimeric Malic Enzyme in Entamoeba histolytica
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into Functions of Universal Stress Proteins Encoded by Genomes of Gastric Cancer Pathogen Helicobacter pylori and Related Bacteria
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/pathogens14030276
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A 10-Year Study of Neonatal Sepsis from Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong

by
Pascoe Lee
*,
Eugene Sin
,
Kam-Tong Yip
and
Kenneth Ng
Department of Clinical Pathology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2025, 14(3), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030276
Submission received: 23 February 2025 / Revised: 9 March 2025 / Accepted: 10 March 2025 / Published: 13 March 2025
Versions Notes

Abstract

Background: Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of infant mortality, and it accounts for a significant consumption of antimicrobials in paediatrics. This is the first comprehensive study on neonatal sepsis in Hong Kong. Methods: From 2014 to 2023, all neonates admitted to a single institution with culture-proven infections from the blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid were selected and reviewed retrospectively. The infecting organisms, their antibiotic nonsusceptibility pattern, and the concordance of empirical antimicrobial therapy with the microbiological profiles were described and were further compared between infants of normal/low birth weight (≥1.5 kg) and very low/extremely low birth weight (<1.5 kg), early-onset sepsis (<72 h), and late-onset sepsis (4–28 days), the first and the second 5-year periods (2014–2018 vs. 2019–2023). Results: After contaminants were excluded, there were 118 affected neonates with 125 organisms identified. Fifty-nine were male. Thirty-four were very low/extremely low birth weight infants, and twenty-eight infants had early-onset sepsis. Patient demographics and the microbiology findings did not differ between the first 5 years and the latter 5 years. However, the incidence of neonatal sepsis was significantly lower in the latter 5 years (3.23 vs. 1.61 per 1000 live births, p < 0.001), the period that coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. Escherichia coli was the most common Gram-negative pathogen. Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus bovis group infections were more common in early-onset sepsis, while coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and non-E. coli Gram-negative pathogens were more likely to occur in late-onset sepsis. In very low/extremely low birth weight infants, the rate of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone nonsusceptibility among Gram-negative isolates was higher (p = 0.01), and concordance of empirical antimicrobial therapy was lower (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Management of neonatal sepsis remains challenging, and there is a need for optimising antimicrobial therapy, especially in preterm patients. Antepartum screening with intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in reducing the risk of early-onset sepsis associated with S. agalactiae, while stringent infection control measures are important for the prevention of late-onset sepsis.

1. Introduction

Neonatal sepsis, invasive bacterial and fungal infections affecting newborn infants within the first 28 days of life, is a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Neonatal sepsis is universal, but its epidemiology is often shaped by socioeconomic and biological factors. The incidence is higher in low- and middle-income countries [1,2]. Compared to term neonates, preterm neonates are especially susceptible to sepsis and its associated mortality [3]. Over the last two decades, antenatal screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis against group B streptococcal infection have been practised in many parts of the world [4,5] and are now recommended by the World Health Organization [6]. Nevertheless, neonatal sepsis remains a significant disease burden, and it is still increasing in some parts of the world [1,7].
The diagnosis and treatment of neonatal sepsis is challenging. Clinical manifestations of neonatal sepsis are often non-specific [8,9], so positive cultures of specimens from normally sterile sites are recognised as the gold standard for the diagnosis [10,11]. However, the sensitivity of such cultures is limited by the often low-volume specimens sampled from neonates [12], and antimicrobial consumption is high in both culture-negative and culture-positive cases [13]. A combination of an aminoglycoside and a penicillin antibiotic has become a widespread choice of empiric therapy for neonatal sepsis for nearly half a century [14] and continues to be the recommended regimen from prominent bodies [15,16,17] despite the evolving aetiology and antimicrobial resistances, especially in lower-income regions [18].
Neonatal sepsis is conventionally classified into early-onset sepsis and late-onset sepsis, of which the latter has a higher case load [19]. Infections that occur in the first 72 h of life can often be traced to perinatal transmission. Those that occur beyond the first 3 days of life have a wide variety of aetiologies, including nosocomial transmission. The microbiological profiles, including pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility, are thus different between the two kinds of neonatal sepsis. Continuous surveillance, both at the institutional and national levels, is important to track the evolving epidemiology and thus to guide effective clinical management. With the recent implementation of universal antenatal screening for maternal group B Streptococcus colonisation and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, there is a growing interest to study early-onset neonatal sepsis, especially neonatal group B streptococcal infection in Hong Kong. As there has not been any systematic study about neonatal sepsis in Hong Kong, we set out to understand the nature of this condition, including the microbiological profile and susceptibility of the microbial isolates, the kinds of neonates affected in terms of birth weight, the differences between early- and late-onset infections, and patterns of empirical antimicrobial treatments, by examining it through one of the major regional neonatal units in the city over a 10-year period.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study of clinical and laboratory data on patients with neonatal sepsis admitted to Tuen Mun Hospital. This is one of the major hospitals in Hong Kong that serves 17.1% of the total population by the year 2021 [20]. The study period was from January 2014 to December 2023, inclusively. Sepsis was defined by the presence of pathogen(s) in the blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) identified by the laboratory via culture.
Blood samples were collected in BACTEC Peds Plus/F culture vials (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). The vials were incubated in the BD BACTEC FX blood culture system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) for up to 5 days, and vials flagged positive were further subcultured onto solid culture media. CSF samples were collected in sterile glass Bijou bottles and inoculated onto solid culture media and Thiol broth (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) enriched with pyridoxal hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Vitox supplement (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) for up to 3 and 5 days, respectively. Growth on culture media was isolated and identified using the available methods (including conventional methods, API identification kits (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), and BD Phoenix (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) automated identification system, and, since August 2016, the Bruker MALDI Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) as well). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and interpretation were performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.
Subjects were included when they were under the chronological age of 28 days of life at the time of microbiological sampling. Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium, Lactobacillus, and Micrococcus spp. were considered culture contaminants [21,22] in the present study and were excluded from analysis. For coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), the cultures were considered significant if they were treated with at least 5 days of effective antibiotics [23,24] with reference to susceptibility results; otherwise, they were also classified as contaminants and were excluded. If a patient has more than one culture request growing the same organism within the period of antibiotic treatment, those positive culture requests would count towards a single organism.
Patient demographics, including the age at the first microbiological culture request that turned positive, gestation in weeks, birth weight in kilograms, and mortality, defined as death within 7 days of a positive blood/CSF culture, were recorded. Additional information collected includes whether patients, prior to the sepsis episode, were ever discharged into the community (defined as out-born) or had been hospitalised since birth (defined as in-born), any systemic antibiotic given in the intrapartum or neonatal period, as well as the antimicrobial choices used.
The study period was divided into two five-year periods, the first five years 2014 to 2018, and the second five years 2019 to 2023. Patients were divided into two groups according to birth weight, the very low/extremely low birth weight (V/ELBW, <1.5 kg) and the normal/low birth weight (N/LBW, ≥1.5 kg) groups. The infections were classified into early-onset sepsis (EOS) if the positive cultures were obtained when the patient was under the age of 72 h of life and into late-onset sepsis (LOS) if patients were older than 72 h of life at the time of specimen collection [9,16,21]. LOS was further classified into healthcare-associated (HA-LOS) if the positive cultures were obtained more than 48 h after admission, including patients who were discharged for less than 48 h before readmission, and community-acquired (CA-LOS) otherwise [25,26,27].
Empiric therapy was defined as antibiotic treatment, alone as monotherapy or in combination therapy, used after blood and/or CSF samples were taken and prior to the report of positive microbiological findings. Empiric therapy was classified as concordant if at least one of the empirical antimicrobials being used was considered an agent for which the pathogen was susceptible based on identification and susceptibility testing, and as discordant if the pathogen was not susceptible to any of the empiric antimicrobials used for that patient.
The included patients’ demographic data, microbiological findings, and treatment relevance were described. Mortality cases would be presented. The demographic data and microbiological findings were compared between the first and the second five-year periods to see if there were any changes over time. Microbiological data, including antibiotic nonsusceptibility, were compared between the different birth weight groups, EOS versus LOS, and between CA-LOS and HA-LOS.
Statistical analysis was performed with Stata 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) would be computed. Non-parametric data were compared by Fisher’s exact test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

A total of 161 neonates were identified with microorganisms found in the blood and/or CSF cultures during the study period. Among them, 43 were excluded as the pathogens were considered contaminants. The remaining 118 neonates formed the subjects of this study, and their demographics are listed in Table 1. The patients’ demographic data were comparable between the two periods.
The total number of live births during the 10-year study period was 45,555, with 27,552 from 2014 to 2018 and 18,003 from 2019 to 2024 [28]. Thus, neonatal sepsis occurred at an annual incidence of 2.59 per 1000 live births. Comparing the figures between the first and second 5-year periods, there was a significant drop in the incidence of neonatal sepsis in the latter period (3.23 vs. 1.61 per 1000 live births, respectively; p < 0.001). When it was analysed separately, the difference was not observed among infants with early-onset neonatal sepsis (0.76 vs. 0.38 per 1000 live births; p = 0.13). However, the incidence of late-onset neonatal sepsis was significantly lower in the latter 5-year period (2.52 vs. 1.22 per 1000 live births; p = 0.003). This latter period from 2019 to 2024 coincided with the global COVID-19 pandemic.
Of the 118 neonates, a total of 125 organisms were found. Among them, 117 organisms were identified from the blood only, 2 from CSF only, and 6 were positive in both the blood and the CSF. From the patient perspective, 113 had a single pathogen, 3 were infected by two organisms, and 2 had three organisms. The list of pathogens is listed in Table 2. Comparing the first and the second 5-year periods, the distribution of Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi did not differ.
The pattern of infection was compared between N/LBW and V/ELBW infants (Table 3). The V/ELBW infants were more often exposed to prior antibiotic treatment, and they had more infections with CoNS and yeasts.
When EOS and LOS were compared (Table 4), streptococcal infections were more common in EOS, especially Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus, GBS) and Streptococcus bovis group (SBG). On the other hand, CoNS and Gram-negative bacteria other than Escherichia coli were more commonly seen in LOS. Among those who presented with CA-LOS, the affected were exclusively N/LBW infants. GBS was exclusively encountered among CA-LOS cases (Table 5).
Eight (6.8%) neonates died. Their clinical and laboratory features are listed in Table 6. All neonates were premature, and seven of them were born at 25 weeks of gestation or less. The pathogens included four yeasts, three Gram-negative bacteria, and one GBS.
Concerning antibiotic nonsusceptibility of the bacterial pathogens (Table 7), most of the staphylococcal isolates were methicillin-resistant. This was even more significant among infants of V/ELBW. On the other hand, the nonsusceptibility of streptococcal isolates to penicillin was uncommon, with only two Streptococcus mitis group isolates being nonsusceptible. All Enterococcus faecalis strains were ampicillin-susceptible. No vancomycin resistance was found among the Gram-positive isolates. The majority of the Gram-negative pathogens were nonsusceptible to ampicillin, while nonsusceptibility to gentamicin and cefotaxime or ceftriaxone varied, with organisms found from the V/ELBW group exhibiting a higher rate of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone nonsusceptibility. No carbapenem resistance was found among the Gram-negative isolates.
The vast majority of patients, 112 (94.9%) out of 118, were empirically prescribed at least two antimicrobials. Monotherapy was used empirically in four cases. One patient did not receive empirical antimicrobials prior to the positive culture result, and another died before the commencement of empirical antimicrobials.
Throughout the study period, both ampicillin and cefotaxime were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics, and the combination corresponded to the most popular regimen used in the neonatal unit (Table 8). However, cefotaxime was used more often in the second 5-year period, while the usage of gentamicin went out of favour. On the other hand, there was a reciprocal relationship between the use of ampicillin and vancomycin when infants with different birth weights were compared. Ampicillin was preferred in N/LBW infants while vancomycin was used more often in V/ELBW infants. Among infants with LOS, the combination of cefotaxime with either ampicillin or vancomycin appeared to be the most popular regimen.
Concordance of empirical antimicrobial therapy and antibiotic susceptibility was achieved in more than 60% of cases (Table 9). It appeared to be lower during the second 5-year period and in late-onset sepsis, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the concordance rate was significantly poorer in septic V/ELBW infants.

4. Discussion

The current study provides the first overview of the microbiological profile of neonatal sepsis, both early- and late-onset sepsis, in Hong Kong over a period of 10 years. Although the number of infected neonates was fewer during the last five years as compared with the first, likely because of the COVID-19 pandemic [29], patient demographics such as the proportion of V/ELBW infants, the ratio of inborn to out-born infants, and the proportion of newborns receiving intrapartum antibiotics prior to the onset of sepsis remained the same. Also, the proportions of the Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, the distribution of common pathogens, and the rate of antibiotic resistances were comparable between the first and the second 5-year periods.
The sharp change in the rate of neonatal sepsis between the first 5 years (2014–2018) and the second 5 years (2019–2023) was an unexpected finding. This difference was not significant among the cases of EOS but was evident among the cases of LOS. This is understandable as EOS results from in utero transmission or spread of pathogens to the foetus through the maternal genital tract with organisms that commonly colonise the genitourinary and lower gastrointestinal tracts [30]. The COVID-19 pandemic probably did not have any effects on such predisposition. On the other hand, LOS is more often related to nosocomial pathogen transmission and medical interventions during hospitalisation [31]. The fall in the incidence of neonatal sepsis, in particular, HA-LOS, was most likely the result of more stringent isolation, reinforced visitor policies on infection control, and hygienic measures targeted at the facilities for pathogen spread [32,33]. A similar fall in the incidence of LOS during the COVID-19 pandemic has also been observed in India [34], Italy [35], and Sweden [36], but not in the USA [22]. This observation reinforces the importance of infection control measures in neonatal healthcare.
GBS remains one of the major pathogens in neonatal sepsis. In Hong Kong, universal prenatal maternal carriage screening was implemented in 2012, and intrapartum antibiotic treatment against GBS was used in those women who were tested positive [37]. The 16 cases represented an annual incidence of 0.36 per 1000 live births, comparable to the incidence rates of 0.26 and 0.24 per 1000 live births limited to the first seven days of life reported by Chan et al. [38] and Ma et al. [39], respectively. GBS occurred more frequently in the first three days of life, accounting for nearly one-third of the pathogens identified. The infection occurred more often in neonates without intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as compared to those who had received antibiotics during the intrapartum or neonatal period. Additionally, in LOS, GBS was exclusively a community-acquired pathogen (p < 0.001). The current study was not designed to look into the reasons why newborns continue to be affected by EOS due to GBS in the era of universal antenatal screening, but the unavailability of a timely screening as a result of unplanned or premature delivery and the limited sensitivity of the screening test have been suggested [38]. Nevertheless, GBS remains susceptible to penicillin and is therefore always covered by the current empirical therapy regimens containing ampicillin or cefotaxime.
SBG was another significant Gram-positive pathogen group in neonatal EOS. Apparently, neonatal SBG infection has been rising following the practice of universal antenatal screening and intrapartum antibiotic targeting GBS [37]. Although our strains remained penicillin-susceptible, clinicians should be aware that SBG with reduced susceptibility to penicillin had been uncommonly reported [40,41,42].
CoNS was the most frequent pathogen of LOS, of which the majority of the strains were methicillin-resistant. Because CoNS are skin commensals [43], neonatal CoNS infections are usually considered to be nosocomial in nature, facilitated by biofilm formation in medical devices such as venous catheters [44,45]. Our data showed that neonates in the V/ELBW group were particularly vulnerable to CoNS infections. Although most CoNS species are understood to be of low virulence, premature newborns are at higher risk of CoNS infections than their term counterparts because they often require prolonged hospitalisation and medical interventions [46].
Gram-negative infections occurred in both EOS and LOS. Escherichia coli was the only Gram-negative pathogen in EOS, which was consistent with the observation that Escherichia coli is the predominant aerobic Gram-negative organism of the birth canal [47]. Non-Escherichia coli Gram-negative infections were exclusively seen in LOS in our series. This is similar to the findings from Yale University School of Medicine looking into the microbiology of neonatal sepsis from 1989 to 2003, where the majority of non-Escherichia coli Gram-negative infections occurred in neonates aged 5 days or above (5–30 days: 63/90 vs. 0–4 days: 9/35) [48]. A more recent study from Sweden also showed non-Escherichia coli Gram-negative infections occurring in LOS more frequently than in EOS (LOS: 51/74 vs. EOS: 9/33) [49]. Our study shows CA-LOS can include organisms that typically affect the older infant, such as Campylobacter jejuni and Neisseria meningitidis. On the other hand, the neonate with prolonged hospitalisation is susceptible to infections due to Gram-negative organisms, often contributed by suboptimal infection prevention and control practises [50] leading to horizontal transmission by healthcare personnel. In addition, the gut of the preterm neonate is colonised with firmicutes and proteobacteria in greater quantities (as most neonatal aerobic Gram-negative pathogens belong to the latter group) [51,52], often contributed by the environment of the neonatal unit [53] and antibiotic exposures [54]. Gut dysbiosis often precedes LOS [52] and is associated with gut translocation [55,56,57], with studies showing similarity of bacterial strains of bloodstream infections to strains found in the stools of such patients before the onset of infection in neonatal units [58].
The mortality of invasive fungal infection in neonates is particularly high [59,60]. From our data, even among HA-LOS patients in the V/ELBW group, invasive fungal infection was still significantly associated with mortality compared to sepsis due to bacterial organisms (4/7 vs. 3/26, p = 0.009). First-line empirical treatment against suspected neonatal invasive candidiasis involves the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate [61,62], but there is a paucity of guidance regarding which neonates should be initiated on empirical antifungal treatment before microbiological results are available. Amphotericin B is not frequently prescribed, as neonatal invasive infection remains uncommon, and amphotericin B is associated with many potential toxicities [63]. As retrospective studies have suggested a possible benefit of early administration of empirical antifungal in cadidaemic neonates [64,65], it would be important to develop recommendations with regard to which patients deserve empirical therapy. On the other hand, guidelines have suggested the use of antifungal prophylaxis in the neonatal unit under specific circumstances [16,61,62], with studies demonstrating variable successes [66,67].
Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a global problem, and neonatal units are not spared [68]. Poorer survival has been noted in neonates infected with multidrug-resistant organisms, especially carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms [69,70]. In the current study, carbapenem resistance was not an issue, but almost half of the Gram-negative isolates among E/VLBW neonates were nonsusceptible to cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. Although the inclusion of a third-generation cephalosporin as part of the empirical antimicrobial use in neonatal sepsis is an attractive option, such use is associated with an increase in the risk of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infection [71] and, especially in preterm infants, candidal colonisation and invasive fungal infections [72,73,74]. A Netherlands study has shown that a regimen containing cefotaxime has a high tendency to result in more cephalosporin resistance in two neonatal units, necessitating the use of meropenem in some patients [75]. Currently, cefotaxime is recommended by guidelines for the empirical treatment of neonatal meningitis, community-acquired neonatal sepsis, and in neonates with microbiological evidence of Gram-negative infections [15,16].
The current study faces several limitations. Although the neonatal unit provided hospitalisation service for all neonates in need in the region served by Tuen Mun Hospital, the single-centre nature of the study limits its generalisability. We have not included patients with culture-negative neonatal sepsis because differentiating from non-infective aetiologies could be difficult [76]. We have not included positive cultures other than blood and CSF, as these are the most common normally sterile specimen types from the neonatal unit. We acknowledge that, in this study, the exclusion of the organisms defined as contaminants, although very rarely causing infections in neonates, may lead to an underestimation of patients with neonatal sepsis, while the approach of using treatment duration for determining the significance of CoNS may lead to overestimation.

5. Conclusions

We presented the first epidemiology and microbiology of culture-proven neonatal sepsis from a single institution in Hong Kong in the post-universal antenatal group B Streptococcus screening era. Early-onset sepsis was mainly caused by group B Streptococcus, Streptococcus bovis group, and Escherichia coli. In late-onset sepsis, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and non-Escherichia coli Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts assumed significance. Overall, cefotaxime consumption had increased in the latter half of the study period. Within these five years when the COVID-19 pandemic reigned, there was a significant drop in neonatal sepsis, especially late-onset sepsis. There is a need for antimicrobial stewardship in the neonatal unit to optimise appropriate therapy for sick neonates, particularly in premature neonates where the concordance of empirical antimicrobial therapy was lower.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.L. and K.N.; data curation, P.L., E.S. and K.-T.Y.; formal analysis, P.L. and E.S.; investigation, P.L.; methodology, P.L., E.S. and K.N.; project administration, K.N.; resources, K.-T.Y. and K.N.; software, E.S.; supervision, K.N.; validation, P.L.; visualization, P.L.; writing—original draft, P.L.; writing—review and editing, P.L., E.S., K.-T.Y. and K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Central Institutional Review Board of Hospital Authority (Central IRB Ref. No.: PAED-2024-080, date of approval: 15 October 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Any patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study and was given exemption by Central IRB.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article material. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
EOSEarly-onset sepsis
LOSLate-onset sepsis
CA-LOSCommunity-acquired late-onset sepsis
HA-LOSHealthcare-associated late-onset sepsis
V/ELBWVery low/extremely low birth weight
N/LBWNormal/low birth weight
GBSStreptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus)
SBGStreptococcus bovis group
CoNSCoagulase-negative Staphylococcus
OROdds ratio
CIConfidence interval

References

  1. Fleischmann, C.; Reichert, F.; Cassini, A.; Horner, R.; Harder, T.; Markwart, R.; Tröndle, M.; Savova, Y.; Kissoon, N.; Schlattmann, P.; et al. Global Incidence and Mortality of Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch. Dis. Child. 2021, 106, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Milton, R.; Gillespie, D.; Dyer, C.; Taiyari, K.; Carvalho, M.J.; Thomson, K.; Sands, K.; Portal, E.A.R.; Hood, K.; Ferreira, A.; et al. Neonatal Sepsis and Mortality in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries from a Facility-Based Birth Cohort: An International Multisite Prospective Observational Study. Lancet Glob. Health 2022, 10, e661–e672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wynn, J.L. Defining Neonatal Sepsis. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2016, 28, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease in Newborns: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 797. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 135, e51–e72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Di Renzo, G.C.; Melin, P.; Berardi, A.; Blennow, M.; Carbonell-Estrany, X.; Donzelli, G.P.; Hakansson, S.; Hod, M.; Hughes, R.; Kurtzer, M.; et al. Intrapartum GBS Screening and Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A European Consensus Conference. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015, 28, 766–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. World Health Organization. WHO Recommendation on Screening of Pregnant Women for Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Early Onset Group B Streptococcus Disease in Newborns; World Health Organization, Human Reproduction Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024; ISBN 978-92-4-009912-8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, J.; Shen, L.; Qian, K. Global, Regional, and National Incidence and Mortality of Neonatal Sepsis and Other Neonatal Infections, 1990–2019. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1139832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Briggs-Steinberg, C.; Roth, P. Early-Onset Sepsis in Newborns. Pediatr. Rev. 2023, 44, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Coggins, S.A.; Glaser, K. Updates in Late-Onset Sepsis: Risk Assessment, Therapy, and Outcomes. Neoreviews 2022, 23, 738–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iroh Tam, P.-Y.; Bendel, C.M. Diagnostics for Neonatal Sepsis: Current Approaches and Future Directions. Pediatr. Res. 2017, 82, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Celik, I.H.; Hanna, M.; Canpolat, F.E. Mohan Pammi, null Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: The Past, Present and Future. Pediatr. Res. 2022, 91, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zea-Vera, A.; Ochoa, T.J. Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Sepsis. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2015, 61, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Prusakov, P.; Goff, D.A.; Wozniak, P.S.; Cassim, A.; Scipion, C.E.A.; Urzúa, S.; Ronchi, A.; Zeng, L.; Ladipo-Ajayi, O.; Aviles-Otero, N.; et al. A Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Use in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: The No-More-Antibiotics and Resistance (NO-MAS-R) Study. EClinicalMedicine 2021, 32, 100727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sharland, E.; Qazi, S.; Heath, P.; Balasegaram, M.; Bielicki, J.; Sharland, M. Can the History of Empiric Antibiotic Treatment for Neonatal Sepsis Inform Future Global Trials? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 1313–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Health Organization. Pocket Book of Hospital Care for Children: Guidelines for the Management of Common Childhood Illnesses, 2nd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; ISBN 978-92-4-154837-3. [Google Scholar]
  16. Neonatal Infection: Antibiotics for Prevention and Treatment; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: London, UK, 2021.
  17. Puopolo, K.M.; Benitz, W.E.; Zaoutis, T.E.; COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN; COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES; Cummings, J.; Juul, S.; Hand, I.; Eichenwald, E.; Poindexter, B.; et al. Management of Neonates Born at ≥35 0/7 Weeks’ Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis. Pediatrics 2018, 142, e20182894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harrison, M.L.; Dickson, B.F.R.; Sharland, M.; Williams, P.C.M. Beyond Early- and Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis Definitions: What Are the Current Causes of Neonatal Sepsis Globally? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Evidence. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2024, 43, 1182–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Song, W.S.; Park, H.W.; Oh, M.Y.; Jo, J.Y.; Kim, C.Y.; Lee, J.J.; Jung, E.; Lee, B.S.; Kim, K.-S.; Kim, E.A.-R. Neonatal Sepsis-Causing Bacterial Pathogens and Outcome of Trends of Their Antimicrobial Susceptibility a 20-Year Period at a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2022, 65, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. 2021 Population Census-District Profiles. Available online: https://www.census2021.gov.hk/en/district_profiles.html (accessed on 22 February 2025).
  21. Klinger, G.; Bromiker, R.; Zaslavsky-Paltiel, I.; Klinger, S.; Sokolover, N.; Lerner-Geva, L.; Reichman, B. ISRAEL NEONATAL NETWORK Late-Onset Sepsis in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics 2023, 152, e2023062223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Kaufman, D.A.; Saha, S.; Puopolo, K.M.; Flannery, D.D.; Weimer, K.E.D.; Greenberg, R.G.; Sanchez, P.J.; Eichenwald, E.C.; Cotten, C.M.; et al. Late-Onset Sepsis Among Extremely Preterm Infants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Pediatrics 2025, 155, e2024067675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stoll, B.J.; Hansen, N.; Fanaroff, A.A.; Wright, L.L.; Carlo, W.A.; Ehrenkranz, R.A.; Lemons, J.A.; Donovan, E.F.; Stark, A.R.; Tyson, J.E.; et al. Late-Onset Sepsis in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates: The Experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002, 110, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hayes, R.; Hartnett, J.; Semova, G.; Murray, C.; Murphy, K.; Carroll, L.; Plapp, H.; Hession, L.; O’Toole, J.; McCollum, D.; et al. Neonatal Sepsis Definitions from Randomised Clinical Trials. Pediatr. Res. 2023, 93, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Giannoni, E.; Agyeman, P.K.A.; Stocker, M.; Posfay-Barbe, K.M.; Heininger, U.; Spycher, B.D.; Bernhard-Stirnemann, S.; Niederer-Loher, A.; Kahlert, C.R.; Donas, A.; et al. Neonatal Sepsis of Early Onset, and Hospital-Acquired and Community-Acquired Late Onset: A Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study. J. Pediatr. 2018, 201, 106–114.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ceparano, M.; Sciurti, A.; Isonne, C.; Baccolini, V.; Migliara, G.; Marzuillo, C.; Natale, F.; Terrin, G.; Villari, P. The Collaborating Group Incidence of Healthcare-Associated Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Four-Year Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Verstraete, E.H.; Blot, K.; Mahieu, L.; Vogelaers, D.; Blot, S. Prediction Models for Neonatal Health Care–Associated Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics 2015, 135, e1002–e1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hospital Authority Statistical Report. Available online: https://www3.ha.org.hk/data/HAStatistics/StatisticalReport/ (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  29. Almeida, A.C.; Granado, M.C.; Sousa, P.; Vieira, M.J. COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown Effect on Neonatal Hospital Admissions from the Community. J. Neonatal-Perinat. Med. 2022, 15, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Raturi, A.; Chandran, S. Neonatal Sepsis: Aetiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Advances and Management Strategies. Clin. Med. Insights Pediatr. 2024, 18, 11795565241281337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kariniotaki, C.; Thomou, C.; Gkentzi, D.; Panteris, E.; Dimitriou, G.; Hatzidaki, E. Neonatal Sepsis: A Comprehensive Review. Antibiotics 2024, 14, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Geleta, D.; Abebe, G.; Workneh, N.; Beyene, G. Epidemiologic Features of Neonatal Sepsis and Its COVID-19 Associated Temporal Patterns in Jimma Medical Center, Ethiopia: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0291610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dutta, S.; Kumar, P.; Paulpandian, R.; Sajan Saini, S.; Sreenivasan, P.; Mukhopadhyay, K.; Sundaram, V.; Kumar, J.; Ray, P. Relationship Between COVID-19 Lockdown and Epidemiology of Neonatal Sepsis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2022, 41, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mukherjee, M.; Poddar, S.; Mukherjee, A.; Bathia, J.N. Covid-Period-Associated Changes in Organism Profile of Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Center from East India. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2022, 69, fmac106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Indrio, F.; Salatto, A.; Amato, O.; Bartoli, F.; Capasso, L.; Corvaglia, L.; Maffei, G.; Mosca, F.; Pettoello Mantovani, M.; Raimondi, F.; et al. COVID-19 Pandemic in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Any Effect on Late-Onset Sepsis and Necrotizing Enterocolitis? Eur. J. Pediatr. 2022, 181, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Palleri, E.; Svenningsson, A.; Markasz, L.; Engstrand Lilja, H. The Incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Late-Onset Sepsis during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Sweden: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Neonatology 2024, 121, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, X.; Chan, P.H.Y.; Lau, H.Y.S.; Tsoi, K.; Lam, H.S. Epidemiologic Changes of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis After the Implementation of Universal Maternal Screening for Group B Streptococcus in Hong Kong. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2023, 42, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chan, Y.T.V.; Lau, S.Y.F.; Hui, S.Y.A.; Ma, T.; Kong, C.W.; Kwong, L.T.; Chan, D.; Lee, D.; Mok, S.L.; Ma, V.; et al. Incidence of Neonatal Sepsis after Universal Antenatal Culture-based Screening of Group B Streptococcus and Intrapartum Antibiotics: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2023, 130, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ma, T.W.L.; Chan, V.; So, C.H.; Hui, A.S.Y.; Lee, C.N.; Hui, A.P.W.; So, P.L.; Kong, C.W.; Fung, B.; Leung, K.Y. Prevention of Early Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease by Universal Antenatal Culture-Based Screening in All Public Hospitals in Hong Kong. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, A. Letters to the Editor. J. Paediatr. Child. Health 2009, 45, 474–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pompilio, A.; Di Bonaventura, G.; Gherardi, G. An Overview on Streptococcus Bovis/Streptococcus Equinus Complex Isolates: Identification to the Species/Subspecies Level and Antibiotic Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Klatte, J.M.; Clarridge, J.E.; Bratcher, D.; Selvarangan, R. A Longitudinal Case Series Description of Meningitis Due to Streptococcus Gallolyticus Subsp. Pasteurianus in Infants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xing, Y.; Naik, S. Baby’s First Bacteria: Discriminating Colonizing Commensals from Pathogens. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 26, 705–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Klingenberg, C.; Aarag, E.; RØnnestad, A.; Sollid, J.E.; Abrahamsen, T.G.; Kjeldsen, G.; Flægstad, T. Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Sepsis in Neonates: Association Between Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation and the Host Inflammatory Response. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2005, 24, 817–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. França, A. The Role of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Biofilms on Late-Onset Sepsis: Current Challenges and Emerging Diagnostics and Therapies. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Findlay, E.; Cullen, E.; Abernethy, C. 297 A Study to Assess the Length of Hospital Stay in Pre-Term Babies under 34 Weeks Gestation. In Proceedings of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine and Neonatal Society; BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.: London, UK; Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health: London, UK, 2022; pp. A136–A137. [Google Scholar]
  47. Maheshwari, A.; Sah, R.; Kumar, J.; Padhi, B.K.; Manna, S.; Pallepogula, D.R.; Joshi, B.; Aggarwal, A.K. Prevalence of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Maternal Cervical Secretions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Newborn 2022, 1, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bizzarro, M.J.; Raskind, C.; Baltimore, R.S.; Gallagher, P.G. Seventy-Five Years of Neonatal Sepsis at Yale: 1928–2003. Pediatrics 2005, 116, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nordberg, V.; Iversen, A.; Tidell, A.; Ininbergs, K.; Giske, C.G.; Navér, L. A Decade of Neonatal Sepsis Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli-a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 1803–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Anthony, M.; Bedford-Russell, A.; Cooper, T.; Fry, C.; Heath, P.T.; Kennea, N.; McCartney, M.; Patel, B.; Pollard, T.; Sharland, M.; et al. Managing and Preventing Outbreaks of Gram-Negative Infections in UK Neonatal Units. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013, 98, F549–F553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cuna, A.; Morowitz, M.J.; Ahmed, I.; Umar, S.; Sampath, V. Dynamics of the Preterm Gut Microbiome in Health and Disease. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2021, 320, G411–G419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, C.-C.; Feng, Y.; Yeh, Y.-M.; Lien, R.; Chen, C.-L.; Zhou, Y.-L.; Chiu, C.-H. Gut Dysbiosis, Bacterial Colonization and Translocation, and Neonatal Sepsis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Infants. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 746111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hartz, L.E.; Bradshaw, W.; Brandon, D.H. Potential NICU Environmental Influences on the Neonate’s Microbiome: A Systematic Review. Adv. Neonatal Care 2015, 15, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mulinge, M.M.; Mwanza, S.S.; Kabahweza, H.M.; Wamalwa, D.C.; Nduati, R.W. The Impact of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Antibiotics on Gut Bacterial Microbiota of Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review. Front. Microbiomes 2023, 2, 1180565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Carl, M.A.; Ndao, I.M.; Springman, A.C.; Manning, S.D.; Johnson, J.R.; Johnston, B.D.; Burnham, C.-A.D.; Weinstock, E.S.; Weinstock, G.M.; Wylie, T.N.; et al. Sepsis from the Gut: The Enteric Habitat of Bacteria That Cause Late-Onset Neonatal Bloodstream Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 58, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Niu, X.; Daniel, S.; Kumar, D.; Ding, E.Y.; Savani, R.C.; Koh, A.Y.; Mirpuri, J. Transient Neonatal Antibiotic Exposure Increases Susceptibility to Late-Onset Sepsis Driven by Microbiota-Dependent Suppression of Type 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sherman, M.P. New Concepts of Microbial Translocation in the Neonatal Intestine: Mechanisms and Prevention. Clin. Perinatol. 2010, 37, 565–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schwartz, D.J.; Shalon, N.; Wardenburg, K.; DeVeaux, A.; Wallace, M.A.; Hall-Moore, C.; Ndao, I.M.; Sullivan, J.E.; Radmacher, P.; Escobedo, M.; et al. Gut Pathogen Colonization Precedes Bloodstream Infection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Sci. Transl. Med. 2023, 15, eadg5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Dermitzaki, N.; Baltogianni, M.; Tsekoura, E.; Giapros, V. Invasive Candida Infections in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Risk Factors and New Insights in Prevention. Pathogens 2024, 13, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Menezes, R.P.; Melo, S.G.O.; Oliveira, M.B.; Silva, F.F.; Alves, P.G.V.; Bessa, M.A.S.; Silva, N.B.S.; Araújo, L.B.; Penatti, M.P.A.; Pedroso, R.S.; et al. Healthcare-Associated Infections in High-Risk Neonates: Temporal Trends in a National Surveillance System. Early Hum. Dev. 2021, 158, 105394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Marr, K.A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Reboli, A.C.; Schuster, M.G.; Vazquez, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, e1–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hope, W.W.; Castagnola, E.; Groll, A.H.; Roilides, E.; Akova, M.; Arendrup, M.C.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Bassetti, M.; Bille, J.; Cornely, O.A.; et al. ESCMID Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Candida Diseases 2012: Prevention and Management of Invasive Infections in Neonates and Children Caused by Candida spp. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Turkova, A.; Roilides, E.; Sharland, M. Amphotericin B in Neonates: Deoxycholate or Lipid Formulation as First-Line Therapy - Is There a “right” Choice? Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 24, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Benjamin, D.K.; Ross, K.; McKinney, R.E.; Benjamin, D.K.; Auten, R.; Fisher, R.G. When to Suspect Fungal Infection in Neonates: A Clinical Comparison of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis Fungemia with Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Bacteremia. Pediatrics 2000, 106, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Greenberg, R.G.; Benjamin, D.K.; Gantz, M.G.; Cotten, C.M.; Stoll, B.J.; Walsh, M.C.; Sánchez, P.J.; Shankaran, S.; Das, A.; Higgins, R.D.; et al. Empiric Antifungal Therapy and Outcomes in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants with Invasive Candidiasis. J. Pediatr. 2012, 161, 264–269.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Blyth, C.C.; Barzi, F.; Hale, K.; Isaacs, D. Chemoprophylaxis of Neonatal Fungal Infections in Very Low Birthweight Infants: Efficacy and Safety of Fluconazole and Nystatin. J. Paediatr. Child. Health 2012, 48, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rundjan, L.; Wahyuningsih, R.; Oeswadi, C.A.; Marsogi, M.; Purnamasari, A. Oral Nystatin Prophylaxis to Prevent Systemic Fungal Infection in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Pediatr. 2020, 20, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Barcellini, L.; Bresesti, I.; Folgori, L. Neglected Populations Not to Be Forgotten: Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance in Neonatal Infections. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yusef, D.; Shalakhti, T.; Awad, S.; Algharaibeh, H.; Khasawneh, W. Clinical Characteristics and Epidemiology of Sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in the Era of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms: A Retrospective Review. Pediatr. Neonatol. 2018, 59, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Thomas, R.; Ondongo-Ezhet, C.; Motsoaledi, N.; Sharland, M.; Clements, M.; Velaphi, S. Incidence and All-Cause Mortality Rates in Neonates Infected With Carbapenem Resistant Organisms. Front. Trop. Dis. 2022, 3, 832011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tsai, M.-H.; Chu, S.-M.; Hsu, J.-F.; Lien, R.; Huang, H.-R.; Chiang, M.-C.; Fu, R.-H.; Lee, C.-W.; Huang, Y.-C. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteremia in the NICU. Pediatrics 2014, 133, e322–e329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cotten, C.M.; McDonald, S.; Stoll, B.; Goldberg, R.N.; Poole, K.; Benjamin, D.K. National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network The Association of Third-Generation Cephalosporin Use and Invasive Candidiasis in Extremely Low Birth-Weight Infants. Pediatrics 2006, 118, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chang, Y.J.; Choi, I.R.; Shin, W.S.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Park, M.S. The Control of Invasive Candida Infection in Very Low Birth Weight Infants by Reduction in the Use of 3rd Generation Cephalosporin. Korean J. Pediatr. 2013, 56, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kaufman, D.A. Challenging Issues in Neonatal Candidiasis. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2010, 26, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. de Man, P.; Verhoeven, B.A.; Verbrugh, H.A.; Vos, M.C.; van den Anker, J.N. An Antibiotic Policy to Prevent Emergence of Resistant Bacilli. Lancet 2000, 355, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Piantino, J.H.; Schreiber, M.D.; Alexander, K.; Hageman, J. Culture Negative Sepsis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Neonates. NeoReviews 2013, 14, e294–e305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Demographics of neonates with neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
Table 1. Demographics of neonates with neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
Period2014–20182019–2023OR [95% CI]p-ValueTotal
Number of Patients8929 118
SexMale44 (49.4%)15 (51.7%)1.10 [0.44, 2.77]159 (50.0%)
Female45 (50.6%)14 (48.3%)59 (50.0%)
Birth weightV/ELBW (<1.5 kg)26 (29.2%)8 (27.6%)0.92 [0.31, 2.52]134 (28.8%)
N/LBW (≥1.5 kg)63 (70.8%)21 (72.4%)84 (71.2%)
OnsetEOS21 (23.6%)7 (24.1%)1.03 [0.33, 2.96]128 (23.7%)
LOS68 (76.4%)22 (75.9%)90 (76.3%)
CA-LOS17 (19.1%)7 (24.1%)1.4 [0.41, 4.43]0.5824 (20.4%)
HA-LOS51 (57.3%)15 (51.7%)66 (55.9%)
HospitalisationIn-born68 (76.4%)21 (72.4%)0.81 [0.29, 2.44]0.889 (75.4%)
Out-born21 (23.6%)8 (27.6%)29 (24.6%)
Prior antibiotic in the intrapartum or neonatal periodNaive32 (36.0%)10 (34.5%)0.94 [0.35, 2.43]142 (35.6%)
Exposed57 (64.0%)19 (65.5%)76 (64.4%)
Abbreviations—OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, V/ELBW: very low/extremely low birth weight, N/LBW: low/normal birth weight, EOS: early-onset sepsis, LOS: late-onset sepsis, CA-LOS: community-acquired LOS, HA-LOS: healthcare-associated LOS.
Table 2. Culture isolates of neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023, by period.
Table 2. Culture isolates of neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023, by period.
2014–20182019–2023OR [95% CI]p-ValueTotal
Culture isolates9431 125
Gram-positive bacteria49 (52.1%)13 (41.9%)0.66 [0.27, 1.62]0.4162 (49.6%)
    Streptoccocus agalactiae13 (13.8%)3 (9.7%)0.67 [0.11, 2.70]0.7616 (12.8%)
    Streptococcus bovis group8 (8.5%)0-0.28 (6.4%)
    Streptococcus mitis group, nonpneumococcal2 (2.1%)0-12 (1.6%)
    Streptococcus pneumoniae1 (1.1%)0-11 (0.8%)
    Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus20 (21.3%)9 (29.0%)1.51 [0.53, 4.10]0.4629 (23.2%)
    Staphylococcus aureus2 (2.1%)0-12 (1.6%)
    Enterococcus faecalis3 (3.2%)1 (3.3%)1.01 [0.02, 13.1]14 (3.2%)
Gram-negative bacteria40 (42.6%)17 (54.8%)1.64 [0.67, 4.04]0.357 (45.6)
    Escherichia coli22 (23.4%)11 (35.5%)1.8 [0.67, 4.67]0.2433 (26.4%)
    Klebsiella pneumoniae complex7 (7.4%)2 (6.5%)0.86 [0.08, 4.86]19 (7.2%)
    Klebsiella aerogenes3 (3.2%)0-0.573 (2.4%)
    Enterobacter cloacae complex3 (3.2%)2 (6.5%)2.09 [0.17, 19.1]0.65 (4%)
    Morganella morganii01 (3.3%)-0.251 (0.8%)
    Salmonella spp.2 (2.2%)0-12 (1.6%)
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa1 (1.1%)0-11 (0.8%)
    Campylobacter jejuni1 (1.1%)1 (3.3%)3.1 [0.04, 246]0.442 (1.6%)
    Neisseria meningitidis1 (1.1%)0-11 (0.8%)
Yeasts5 (5.3%)1 (3.2%)0.59 [0.01, 5.63]16 (4.8%)
    Candida albicans3 (3.2%)0-0.573 (2.4%)
    Candida tropicalis1 (1.1%)0-11 (1.6%)
    Candida orthopsilosis01 (3.2%)-0.251 (1.6%)
    Lodderomyces elongisporus1 (1.1%)0-11 (1.6%)
Abbreviations—OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.
Table 3. Patient characteristics and culture isolates of neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023, by birth weight.
Table 3. Patient characteristics and culture isolates of neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023, by birth weight.
V/ELBW (<1.5 kg)N/LBW (≥1.5 kg)OR [95% CI]p-Value
Number of patientsTotal3484
OnsetEOS5 (14.7%)23 (27.4%)0.46 [0.12, 1.41]0.16
LOS29 (85.3%)61 (72.6%)
HospitalisationIn-born34 (100%)55 (65.5%)-<0.001
Out-born029 (34.5%)
Prior antibiotic in the intrapartum or neonatal periodNaive3 (8.8%)39 (46.4%)0.11 [0.02, 0.41]0.001
Exposed31 (91.2%)45 (53.6%)
Culture isolatesTotal3887
Gram-positive bacteria 21 (55.3%)41 (47.1%)1.39 [0.60, 3.21]0.44
    Streptoccocus agalactiae 3 (7.9%)13 (14.9%)0.49 [0.08, 1.95]0.39
    Streptococcus bovis group 1 (2.6%)7 (8.0%)0.31 [0.01, 2.57]0.43
    Streptococcus mitis group, nonpneumococcal 02 (2.3%)-1
    Streptococcus pneumoniae 01 (1.1%)-1
    Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 15 (39.5%)14 (16.1%)3.40 [1.30, 8.83]0.006
    Staphylococcus aureus 1 (2.6%)1 (1.1%)2.32 [0.03, 185]0.52
    Enterococcus faecalis 1 (2.6%)3 (3.4%)0.76 [0.01, 9.81]1
Gram-negative bacteria 11 (28.9%)46 (52.9%)0.36 [0.14, 0.88]0.019
    Escherichia coli 5 (13.6%)28 (32.2%)0.32 [0.09, 0.96]0.029
    Klebsiella pneumoniae complex 2 (5.3%)7 (8.0%)0.63 [0.06, 3.58]0.72
    Klebsiella aerogenes 1 (2.6%)2 (2.3%)1.15 [0.02, 22.7]1
    Enterobacter cloacae complex 2 (5.3%)3 (3.4%)1.56 [0.12, 14.1]0.64
    Morganella morganii 01 (1.1%)-1
    Salmonella spp. 02 (2.3%)-1
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 (2.6%)0-0.3
    Campylobacter jejuni 02 (2.3%)-1
    Neisseria meningitidis 01 (1.1%)-1
Yeasts 6 (15.8%)0-<0.001
Abbreviations—OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, V/ELBW: very low/extremely low birth weight, N/LBW: low/normal birth weight, EOS: early-onset sepsis, LOS: late-onset sepsis.
Table 4. Patient characteristics and culture isolates of neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023, by sepsis onset.
Table 4. Patient characteristics and culture isolates of neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023, by sepsis onset.
EOSLOSOR [95% CI]p-Value
Number of patients 2890
Birth weightV/ELBW (<1.5 kg)5 (17.8%)29 (32.2%)2.19 [0.71, 8.07]0.16
N/LBW (≥1.5 kg)23 (82.1%)61 (67.8%)
HospitalisationIn-born28 (100%)61 (67.8%)-<0.001
Out-born029 (32.2%)
Prior antibiotic in the intrapartum or neonatal periodNaive17 (60.7%)25 (27.8%)0.25 [0.09, 0.66]0.003
Exposed11 (39.3%)65 (72.2%)
Culture isolatesTotal2996
Gram-positive bacteria 18 (62.1%)44 (45.8%)0.52 [0.20, 1.31]0.14
    Streptoccocus agalactiae 9 (32.1%)7 (7.3%)0.17 [0.05–0.61]0.002
    Streptococcus bovis group 7 (24.1%)1 (1.0%)0.03 [0.0007, 0.29]<0.001
    Streptococcus mitis group, nonpneumococcal 02 (2.1%)-1
    Streptococcus pneumoniae 1 (3.4%)0-0.23
    Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 1 (3.4%)28 (31.1%)11.5 [1.70, 488]0.003
    Staphylococcus aureus 02 (2.1%)-1
    Enterococcus faecalis 04 (4.2%)-0.57
Gram-negative bacteria 11 (37.9%)46 (47.9%)1.51 [0.60, 3.92]0.4
    Escherichia coli 11 (37.9%)22 (22.9%)0.49 [0.18, 1.33]0.15
   Non-Escherichia coli 024 (25.0%)-0.001
    Klebsiella pneumoniae complex 09 (9.4%)-0.12
    Klebsiella aerogenes 03 (3.1%)-1
    Enterobacter cloacae complex 05 (5.2%)-0.59
    Morganella morganii 01 (1.0%)-1
    Salmonella spp. 02 (2.1%)-1
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa 01 (1.0%)-1
    Campylobacter jejuni 02 (2.1%)-1
    Neisseria meningitidis 01 (1.0%)-1
Yeasts 06 (6.3%)-0.33
Abbreviations—OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, V/ELBW: very low/extremely low birth weight, N/LBW: low/normal birth weight, EOS: early-onset sepsis, LOS: late-onset sepsis.
Table 5. Patient characteristics and culture isolates of LOS in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
Table 5. Patient characteristics and culture isolates of LOS in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
CA-LOSHA-LOSOR [95% CI]p-Value
Number of patientsTotal2466
Birth weightV/ELBW (<1.5 kg)029 (43.9%)-<0.001
N/LBW (≥1.5 kg)24 (100%)37 (56.1%)
HospitalisationIn-born060 (90.9%)-<0.001
Out-born24 (100%)6 (9.1%)
Prior antibiotic in the intrapartum or neonatal periodNaive13 (54.2%)12 (18.2%)0.19 [0.06, 0.59]0.001
Exposed11 (45.8%)54 (81.8%)
Culture isolatesTotal2472
Gram-positive bacteria 11 (45.8%)33 (45.8%)1.0 [0.36, 2.83]1
    Streptoccocus agalactiae 7 (29.2%)0-<0.001
    Streptococcus bovis group 01 (1.4%)-1
    Streptococcus mitis group, nonpneumococcal 1 (4.2%)1 (1.4%)0.32 [0.004, 26.5]0.44
    Streptococcus pneumoniae 00--
    Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 3 (12.5%)25 (34.7%)3.72 [0.96, 21.2]0.042
    Staphylococcus aureus 02 (2.8%)-1
    Enterococcus faecalis 04 (5.6%)-0.57
Gram-negative bacteria 13 (54.2%)33 (54.2%)0.72 [0.25, 2.00]0.49
    Escherichia coli 8 (33.3%)14 (19.4%)0.48 [0.16, 1.59]0.17
    Klebsiella pneumoniae complex 09 (12.5%)-0.11
    Klebsiella aerogenes 03 (4.2%)-0.57
    Enterobacter cloacae complex 1 (4.2%)4 (5.6%)1.35 [0.12, 69.5]1
    Morganella morganii 01 (1.4%)-1
    Salmonella spp. 1 (4.2%)1 (1.4%)0.32 [0.004, 26.5]0.44
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa 01 (1.4%)11
    Campylobacter jejuni 2 (8.3%)0-0.06
    Neisseria meningitidis 1 (4.2%)0-0.25
Yeasts 06 (8.3%)-0.33
Abbreviations—OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, V/ELBW: very low/extremely low birth weight, N/LBW: low/normal birth weight, LOS: late-onset sepsis, CA-LOS: community-acquired LOS, HA-LOS: healthcare-associated LOS.
Table 6. Mortality cases of neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
Table 6. Mortality cases of neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
PatientSexGestation (Weeks)Birth Weight (kg)Age at Which Positive Culture Obtained (Days)SpecimenOrganismEmpirical Antimicrobial(s) GivenConcordance
1F250.7500BloodStreptococcus agalactiaeAmpicillin, gentamicin+
2F250.6650BloodEscherichia coliDied before antimicrobial commencedN/A
3F331.5209BloodEscherichia coliCefotaxime, vancomycin, metronidazole+
4M240.6256BloodPseudomonas aeruginosaMeropenem, vancomycin+
5M230.52011BloodCandida albicansCefotaxime, teicoplanin−
6M240.69013BloodCandida albicansMeropenem, vancomycin−
7M230.6703BloodCandida tropicalisCefotaxime, vancomycin−
8M240.74011BloodLodderomyces elongisporusCefotaxime, vancomycin, metronidazole−
Abbreviations—M: male, F: female; +: concordant, −: discordant, N/A: not applicable.
Table 7. Nonsusceptibility of isolates* found in neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
Table 7. Nonsusceptibility of isolates* found in neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
PeriodBirth WeightOnset
OrganismsAntibiotic2014–20182019–2023OR
[95% CI]		p-ValueN/LBW (≥1.5 kg)V/ELBW (<1.5 kg)OR
[95% CI]		p-ValueEOSLOSOR
[95% CI]		p-Value
CA-LOSHA-LOS
StaphylococciMethicillin18/22 (81.8%)7/9 (77.8%)0.78
[0.09, 10.5]		1.09/15 (60.0%)16/16 (100%)-0.0060/125/30 (83.3%)-0.19
0/325/27 (92.6%)-0.003
StreptococciPenicillin2/24 (8.3%)0/3-1.02/23 (8.7%)0/4-1.00/172/10 (20%)-0.13
1/8 (12.5%)1/2 (50.0%)-0.38
Gram-negative bacteriaAmpicillin25/28 (89.2%)13/15 (86.7%)0.78
[0.12, 5.27]		1.030/35 (85.7%)8/8 (100%)-0.568/9 (88.9%)30/34 (88.2%)7.0
[0.04, 626]		1.0
7/9 (77.8%)23/25 (92.0%)0.94
[0.02, 11.4]		0.28
Cefotaxime/ceftriaxone5/38 (13.2%)4/16 (25.0%)2.2
[0.37, 12.1]		0.424/43 (9.3%)5/11 (45.5%)8.13
[1.27, 51.8]		0.010/119/43 (20.9%)3.29
[0.20, 51.2]		0.18
1/11 (9.1%)8/32 (25.0%)-0.41
Gentamicin4/36 (11.1%)4/16 (25.0%)2.67
[0.42, 16.5]		0.237/41 (17.1%)1/11 (9.1%)0.49
[0.01, 4.65]		1.04/11 (36.4%)4/41 (9.6%)3.33
[0.35, 162]		0.052
0/94/34 (11.8%)0.19
[0.03, 1.32]		1.0
* Where tested or able to be inferred. Abbreviations—OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, V/ELBW: very low/extremely low birth weight, N/LBW: low/normal birth weight, EOS: early-onset sepsis, LOS: late-onset sepsis, CA-LOS: community-acquired LOS, HA-LOS: healthcare-associated LOS.
Table 8. Patterns of empirical antibiotic prescription by frequency for neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
Table 8. Patterns of empirical antibiotic prescription by frequency for neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
PeriodBirth WeightOnset
Antimicrobial2014–20182019–2023OR
[95% CI]		p-valueN/LBW (≥1.5 kg)V/ELBW (<1.5 kg)OR
[95% CI]		p-ValueEOSLOSOR
[95% CI]		p-Value
CA-LOSHA-LOS
Penicillin2 (2.2%)0-1.01 (1.2%)1 (2.9%)2.52
[0.03, 200]		0.4952 (7.1%)0-0.055
Ampicillin55 (61.8%)19 (65.5%)1.17
[0.45, 3.18]		0.8368 (81.0%)6 (17.6%)0.05
[0.02, 0.15]		<0.00125 (89.3%)49 (54.4%)0.14
[0.03, 0.53]		<0.001
24 (100%)25 (37.9%)-<0.001 #
Cefotaxime58 (65.2%)28 (96.6%)15.0
[2.21, 631]		<0.00159 (70.2%)27 (79.4%)1.63
[0.59, 5.02]		0.379 (32.1%)77 (85.6%)12.5
[4.21, 38.0]		<0.001
22 (91.6%)55 (83.3%)0.45
[0.05, 2.36]		0.50 #
Meropenem4 (4.5%)0-0.571 (1.2%)3 (8.8%)8.03
[0.61, 427]		0.0704 (4.4%)-0.57
04 (6.1%)-0.57 #
Gentamicin24 (27.0%)3 (10.3%)0.31
[0.06, 1.18]		0.0822 (26.2%)5 (14.7%)0.49
[0.13, 1.50]		0.2318 (64.3%)9 (10.0%)0.06
[0.02, 0.19]		<0.001
2 (8.3%)7 (10.6%)1.31
[0.22, 13.8]		1.0 #
Vancomycin23 (25.8%)10 (34.5%)1.51
[0.54, 4.02]		0.4812 (14.3%)21 (61.7%)9.69
[3.51, 27.1]		<0.001033 (36.7%)-<0.001
033 (50.0%)-<0.001 #
Teicoplanin1 (1.1%)0-1.001 (2.9%)-0.2901 (1.1%)-1.0
01 (1.5%)-1.0 #
Metronidazole7 (7.9%)3 (10.3%)1.35
[0.21, 6.45]		0.719 (10.7%)1 (2.9%)0.25
[0.01, 1.97]		0.282 (7.1%)8 (8.9%)1.27
[0.23, 13.0]		1.0
08 (12.1%)-0.10 #
Amphotericin B1 (1.1%)0-1.001 (2.9%)-0.2901 (1.1%)-1.0
01 (1.5%)-1.0 #
#—Comparing CA-LOS versus HA-LOS. Abbreviations—OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, V/ELBW: very low/extremely low birth weight, N/LBW: low/normal birth weight, EOS: early-onset sepsis, LOS: late-onset sepsis, CA-LOS: community-acquired LOS, HA-LOS: healthcare-associated LOS.
Table 9. Concordance of empiric antimicrobial therapy in neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
Table 9. Concordance of empiric antimicrobial therapy in neonatal sepsis in Tuen Mun Hospital, 2014–2023.
2014–20182019–2023OR
[95% CI]		p-ValueN/LBW (≥1.5 kg)V/ELBW (<1.5 kg)OR
[95% CI]		p-ValueEOSLOSOR
[95% CI]		p-Value
CA-LOSHA-LOS
All antimicrobial prescriptions70/86 (81.4%)19/28 (67.9%)0.48
[0.17, 1.45]		0.1969/81 (85.2%)20/33 (60.6%)0.27
[0.10, 0.76]		0.00625/27 (92.6%)64/87 (73.6%)0.22
[0.02, 1.03]		0.06
20/22 (90.9%)44/65 (67.7%)0.40
[0.18, 0.88]		0.048
Empirical prescriptions that included:
Ampicillin and gentamicin18/20 (90.0%)1/3 (33.3%)0.06
[0.0009, 1.84]		0.0717/21 (81.0%)2/2 (100%)-1.014/16 (87.5%)5/7 (71.4%)0.36
[0.02, 6.47]		0.56
1/2 (50.0%)4/5 (80.0%)4.0
[0.03, 391]		1.0
Ampicillin and cefotaxime31/34 (91.2%)12/15 (80.0%)0.39
[0.05, 3.37]		0.3541/45 (91.1%)2/4 (50.0%)0.10
[0.01, 1.83]		0.079/9 (100%)34/40 (85.0%)-0.58
19/20 (95.0%)15/20 (75.0%)0.16
[0.003, 1.70]		0.18
Vancomycin and cefotaxime13/20 (65.0%)5/9 (55.6%)0.67
[0.10, 4.64]		0.697/11 (63.6%)11/18 (61.1%)0.90
[0.14, 5.35]		1.00018/29 (62.1%)--
Other antibiotics8/12 (66.7%)1/1 (100%)-1.04/4 (100%)5/9 (55.6%)-0.232/2 (100%)07/11 (63.6%)-1.0
Abbreviations—OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, V/ELBW: very low/extremely low birth weight, N/LBW: low/normal birth weight, EOS: early-onset sepsis, LOS: late-onset sepsis, CA-LOS: community-acquired LOS, HA-LOS: healthcare-associated LOS.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, P.; Sin, E.; Yip, K.-T.; Ng, K. A 10-Year Study of Neonatal Sepsis from Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong. Pathogens 2025, 14, 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030276

AMA Style

Lee P, Sin E, Yip K-T, Ng K. A 10-Year Study of Neonatal Sepsis from Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong. Pathogens. 2025; 14(3):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030276

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Pascoe, Eugene Sin, Kam-Tong Yip, and Kenneth Ng. 2025. "A 10-Year Study of Neonatal Sepsis from Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong" Pathogens 14, no. 3: 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030276

APA Style

Lee, P., Sin, E., Yip, K.-T., & Ng, K. (2025). A 10-Year Study of Neonatal Sepsis from Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong. Pathogens, 14(3), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030276

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop