Next Article in Journal
Susceptibility to Postbiotic Substances-Enterocins of the Strains Enterococcus thailandicus from Beavers (Castor fiber)
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Ruminants as Sentinel Animals in the Circulation of the West Nile Virus in Tunisia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Encystment and Excystment Processes in Acanthamoeba castellanii: An Emphasis on Cellulose Involvement

by
Mathew Choaji
1,2,†,
Ascel Samba-Louaka
2,
Zineb Fechtali-Moute
1,
Willy Aucher
2,* and
Sébastien Pomel
1,*
1
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS BioCIS, 91400 Orsay, France
2
Université de Poitiers, UMR CNRS 7267, Laboratoire Ecologie et Biologie des Interactions, 86000 Poitiers, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland.
Pathogens 2025, 14(3), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030268
Submission received: 31 January 2025 / Revised: 4 March 2025 / Accepted: 7 March 2025 / Published: 10 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Acanthamoeba Infections)

Abstract

:
The free-living amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii is a unicellular eukaryote distributed in a wide range of soil or aquatic environments, either natural or human-made, such as rivers, lakes, drinking water, or swimming pools. Besides its capacity to transport potential pathogens, such as bacteria or viruses, Acanthamoeba spp. can have intrinsic pathogenic properties by causing severe infections at the ocular and cerebral level, named granulomatous amoebic encephalitis and amoebic keratitis, respectively. During its life cycle, A. castellanii alternates between a vegetative and mobile form, named the trophozoite, and a resistant, latent, and non-mobile form, named the cyst. The cyst wall of Acanthamoeba is double-layered, with an inner endocyst and an outer ectocyst, and is mainly composed of cellulose and proteins. The resistance of cysts to many environmental stresses and disinfection treatments has been assigned to the presence of cellulose. The current review aims to present the importance of this glycopolymer in Acanthamoeba cysts and to further report the pathways involved in encystment and excystment.

1. Introduction

Free-living amoebae (FLA) are unicellular microorganisms that can live autonomously in the environment, as opposed to parasitic amoebae that require a host to survive [1]. They are ubiquitous in various aquatic and terrestrial environments, exhibiting a range of ecological roles [2,3]. FLA primarily feed on microorganisms such as bacteria through phagocytosis [4,5]. However, some pathogenic bacteria including Legionella pneumophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Mycobacterium spp. can resist phagocytosis and multiply in FLA [5,6]. This highlights the role of FLA as potential carriers of pathogenic bacteria in natural environments [5,7], where bacteria can evade predation and survive adverse conditions, thereby increasing their persistence and potential for transmission and raising concerns about public health and water quality management [8,9]. FLA are commonly found in water sources, and their association with pathogenic bacteria suggests a potential risk for waterborne infections [10,11]. Several works reported that intracellular growth in the FLA Acanthamoeba castellanii influences the entry mechanism and enhances the virulence of L. pneumophila [12,13,14]. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the interactions between microorganisms in complex ecosystems. The ability of pathogenic bacteria to exploit FLA for survival and replication demonstrates the interconnectedness of microbial communities and the potential for cross-species interactions to influence disease dynamics.
Besides their role as potential reservoirs of pathogenic microorganisms, some FLA species stand out as pathogens capable of causing severe human infections, such as granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE) caused by Acanthamoeba spp. and Balamuthia mandrillaris and primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM) caused by Naegleria fowleri. Acanthamoeba spp. can also cause amoebic keratitis (AK), a serious ocular infection associated with corneal trauma, frequently associated with improper use of contact lenses [15,16,17]. For cerebral infections, FLA enter the body either through skin lesions (Acanthamoeba spp. or B. mandrillaris) or after inhalation of contaminated water or soil and will further colonize the upper (PAM) or lower (GAE) respiratory tract before reaching the brain [16]. While only several hundreds of FLA cerebral infections have been reported so far worldwide, the annual incidence of AK is currently estimated at more than 20,000 cases worldwide, corresponding approximately to a prevalence of 2.9 cases per million individuals, with notable variabilities between countries, and to 2% of all corneal infections [18,19,20]. In the 1990s, the AK incidence was estimated at only one or two cases per million lens wearers. This increase was mainly ascribed to higher popularity of contact lens wearing, but also to a greater awareness and better diagnosis techniques. Combination therapies, empirically associating a large diversity of drugs, are commonly used for cerebral FLA infections [18]. Likewise, combinations of drugs like chlorhexidine with polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) or propamidine have been commonly used to treat amoebic keratitis [21,22]. However, treating amoebic keratitis requires frequent and prolonged drug administration, with infection relapse in 10% of the cases [23]. Nonetheless, a high dose of PHMB (0.08%) monotherapy has recently shown very promising results in clinical practice and has received a marketing authorization for amoebic keratitis treatment by the European Commission [24,25].
Various strategies, including chlorine, heat shock, and peracetic acid with hydrogen peroxide, are employed to disinfect FLA in warm water networks [26]. Nevertheless, resistance to these disinfectants is emerging as a challenge [27]. These difficulties stem from the free-living amoebae’s ability to undergo encystment, a pivotal survival strategy in response to adverse environmental conditions such as nutrient depletion, osmotic stress, and chemical stressors including bacterial toxins [11]. This differentiation process complicates treatment efficacy and makes eradicating the amoebae difficult. Therefore, understanding the fundamental biology of FLA, particularly their life cycle dynamics, is crucial for the development of effective strategies to mitigate their pathogenic potential.
FLA exhibit a complex life cycle involving encystation, also known as encystment, where trophozoites convert into cysts allowing them to withstand unfavorable conditions, and excystation (or excystment), where cysts convert back into trophozoites, enabling amoebae to resume their active, vegetative state when environmental conditions improve [28,29,30,31].
Within FLA’s life cycle, the trophozoite stage corresponds to a vegetative form capable of feeding, multiplying, and moving by amoeboid movement (Figure 1A). Trophozoites are particularly important in the pathogenesis of diseases caused by these protozoa, as they are often responsible for tissue damage and clinical symptoms and the internalization and transport of potential pathogenic microorganisms [32]. On the other hand, the cyst stage is a dormant and resistant form that enables the protozoa to survive harsh environmental conditions (Figure 1B). Remarkably, cysts can remain viable in the environment for up to 20 years while maintaining their pathogenicity [33]. Additionally, some FLA from the family Vahlkampfiidae group, such as N. fowleri, can produce flagellated forms, which further enhance their ability to disseminate to various environmental conditions [34].
While trophozoites are sensitive to disinfection or treatment, cysts are resistant to diverse disinfection or treatment conditions [23,27]. Indeed, cysts of the FLA from the genus Acanthamoeba have been shown to be especially resistant to several environmental stresses or disinfection methods, more than other FLA such as N. fowleri or Vermamoeba vermiformis [27,35]. Aksozek et al. (2002) investigated the resistance of A. castellanii cysts to various physical, chemical, and radiological conditions, revealing their remarkable resilience to environmental stresses [36]. The study shows that Acanthamoeba cysts can endure prolonged desiccation without losing viability and tolerate a wide range of temperatures. Additionally, cysts exhibit resistance to many chemical agents and UV radiation [36], allowing them to persist in environments subjected to water treatment and disinfection protocols in healthcare settings. Indeed, FLA have been identified at different steps of drinking water distribution systems, from treatment plants to tap water [37,38], and an enrichment of FLA has been especially observed in biofilms developed at upper levels of drinking water storage towers [39]. This unequal distribution would be due to variations of water level in the storage tower leading to organic matter deposition of the support, and also, for some FLA genera such as Acanthamoeba, a decrease in cyst density as a function of their age [40]. These findings underscore the robustness of Acanthamoeba cysts and the need for enhanced water treatment strategies, stricter monitoring to ensure the safety of drinking water and other public water systems, and the development of more effective sterilization methods to prevent nosocomial infections.
The resistance of cysts has been attributed to the presence of cellulose in the cyst wall, as an increase in cellulose content coincides with biocide resistance [17,35,41,42]. In A. castellanii, cellulose is reported to make up to 35% of the cyst wall, and variations in the cellulose composition of cyst walls result in differing resistance to biocides among closely related Acanthamoeba species [42]. One study identified that resistance to various biocides and moist heat was developed between 12 h and 36 h, corresponding with increased levels of cellulose in the cell samples at approximately 14 h to 16 h [17]. These data are in line with several works showing an upregulation of transcripts related to carbohydrate biosynthetic pathways within the first hours of encystment [43]. Moreover, a functional analysis using siRNA showed that both cellulose synthase and xylose isomerase activities are crucial for A. castellanii encystment [44]. Furthermore, a digestion of A. castellanii cysts with low concentrations of cellulase (7.5 U/mL) stimulated their excystment [10], reinforcing the hypothesis that cellulose is a main component of A. castellanii cyst walls. Indeed, cellulose synthesis has been shown to be essential for the differentiation of viable cysts in other amoebae [45]. While the genome of A. castellanii encodes for cellulose-synthase and cellulase, it is also composed of genes involved in the synthesis of another glycopolymer involved in cyst wall composition of several protozoa cysts [46,47,48]: chitin. As both cellulase and chitinase activities have been measured during A. castellanii excystment [29], and as the chitin-binding WGA (wheat germ agglutinin) lectin can bind to their cyst wall [49,50], the presence of chitin in Acanthamoeba cyst walls cannot be excluded. However, an exogenous treatment with 0.1 U/mL to 2 U/mL of chitinase did not have any effect on A. castellanii cysts [10]. Although the chitinase concentrations used in this work were low, the proportion of chitin in A. castellanii cyst wall remains to be clarified and its role during encystment or excystment is currently under debate.
Understanding the mechanisms underlying cyst resistance is important for developing effective strategies to control Acanthamoeba infections and mitigate their impact on human health [51]. This review focuses on both the encystment and the excystment processes of A. castellanii, exploring the findings from scanning electron microscope studies, morphological observations, molecular investigations, and potential therapeutic strategies targeting cellulose degradation and biosynthesis pathways.

2. Structure of the Cyst Wall

The cyst wall of A. castellanii, like many other amoebae, is composed of two layers, the ectocyst and the endocyst, which are separated by an intercystic space (Figure 2; Figure 3A) [11,52,53,54]. Ectocyst and endocyst layers merge at the level of ostioles, corresponding to pores used to monitor environmental conditions. Each ostiole is covered by a cap, named the operculum, which is removed during excystment to allow trophozoite emergence. In Acanthamoeba, the ectocyst is the outermost layer of the cyst wall composed of acid-insoluble proteins and polysaccharides, including cellulose, and serves as a protective layer (Figure 3B) [30]. The endocyst is the innermost layer, composed mainly of cellulose, and plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of the cyst and protecting the enclosed trophozoite (Figure 3B). The intercystic space is filled with proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and some traces of cellulose which provides additional support to the cyst. The endocyst is thicker and the ectocyst is thinner and wrinkled [55]. Although cellulose appears to be the main polysaccharide of the Acanthamoeba cyst wall, the presence of other carbohydrates cannot be excluded, as Acanthamoeba cysts can be labeled with probes binding to chitin (WGA) or both β-1,3- and β-1,4-glucans (Calcofluor white; Figure 3B) [49,56,57]. Moreover, three main lectins, named Jonah, Luke, and Leo, as well as an abundant copper oxidase, named laccase, have also been specifically localized to the endocyst and ostioles or to the ectocyst (Figure 3B) [49]. The morphology of the FLA cyst walls depends on their genus and species and has been used for their identification [11]. Observations under the light microscope revealed that in Acanthamoeba spp. cysts are spherical or ovoid with characteristic polygonal endocysts (Figure 1B), although they may sometimes be deformed [41].

3. Encystment

The three phases of encystment in A. castellanii are the induction phase, the wall-synthesis phase, and, ultimately, a dormant stage characterized by decreased metabolic activity. These phases occur in sequence, each stage being estimated to last approximately 4–6 h, 20–24 h, and 2–7 d, respectively [17].
Biochemical changes accompany the encystment process, involving intricate regulatory mechanisms and molecular pathways [43,58,59]. Indeed, A. castellanii rapidly responds to starvation, a nutritional stress-inducing encystment, through regulation of protein phosphorylation and gene expression at the transcriptional level [43]. Transcripts related to carbohydrate metabolic processes, presumably reflecting the formation of cellulose cell wall, were upregulated as early as 1 h after starvation [43]. Previous studies have also shed light on various aspects of encystment, highlighting the roles of many proteins such as autophagy proteins [60,61,62,63], ubiquitin-like proteins [64], or a specific cyst protein named CSP21 (Cyst-Specific Protein of 21 kDa) [65], or diverse enzymes with protease [66,67,68,69], deacetylase [70], acetyltransferase [71], methyltransferase [72], phosphodiesterase [73], kinase [74], or glycogen phosphorylase [75] activities (Figure 4). The latter has been found to be essential for glycogen breakdown to provide glucose for cellulose synthesis during A. castellanii encystment. Likewise, cellulose synthesis and cellulose synthase activity have also been found to increase during encystment and to be essential for this cellular process [44,76,77,78,79] (Figure 4).
Encystment is a tightly regulated process driven by various signaling pathways that lead to the synthesis and assembly of the cyst wall, a structure primarily composed of cellulose and other polysaccharides in Acanthamoeba [11,57,80]. This process begins with the formation of the outer layer, the ectocyst, followed the development of the inner layer, the endocyst, in mature cysts [54] (Figure 4). Studies by Chavez-Munguia et al. (2013) and Garajová et al. (2019) have highlighted the importance of cellulose fibrils in cyst wall architecture and the organization of the cytoskeleton during encystment [41,52]. Cellulose fibrils were detected in both cyst wall layers, namely the endocyst and the ectocyst, as well as in the intercystic space [41]. Moreover, three main lectins constituting the Acanthamoeba cyst wall, named Jonah, Luke, and Leo, and a laccase were described to bind to cellulose and, to a lesser extent, to chitin, and to be highly regulated during encystment (Figure 3B) [49]. Recent cellular studies have confirmed that ectocyst localization of Jonah and laccase is caused by early encystment-specific expression and localization to the endocyst and ostioles of Luke and Leo is caused by later expression [50]. Structural analyses of the lectins have identified the carbohydrate-binding modules of the lectins, named β-jelly-roll folds (BJRFs) in Luke, four disulfide knots (4DKs) in Leo, and a single β-helical fold (BHF) in Jonah, which bind to glycopolymers in both layers of the deproteinated cyst wall. The presence of aromatic amino acids in BJRFs and 4DKs is necessary for cellulose binding and proper localization of Luke and Leo in the cyst wall [50]. Moreover, evolutionary studies suggested a bacterial origin of Jonah BHFs, a common ancestry with slime molds for Luke BJRFs, while Leo 4DKs were unique to Acanthamoeba [50]. Interestingly, Deichmann and Jantzen (1977) discovered that cellulases, enzymes that degrade cellulose, are also expressed during encystment, which seems paradoxical [81]. This simultaneous expression of cellulose synthase and cellulases can probably be explained by their tightly regulated spatial and temporal activity, where controlled cellulose degradation could be necessary for cyst wall remodeling and maturation. Cellulases may also remove inadequately-structured cellulose, ensuring high-quality cyst wall formation. Furthermore, cellulases may have additional roles beyond cellulose degradation, and could be involved in signaling pathways, with potential non-cellulolytic roles during encystment. This complexity underscores the need for further research into these regulatory networks of Acanthamoeba encystment.

4. Excystment

Excystment is a poorly studied process that is triggered by environmental signals such as nutrient availability [30,82,83] or the presence of bacteria [84]. Chambers and Thompson have provided a detailed study of the excystment stages in A. castellanii using scanning electron microscopy and identified four distinct phases and specific structural features involved in this process [85]. In the mature cyst stage, cysts display multiple ostioles covered by an operculum, with a characteristic double-layered cyst wall comprising an inner endocyst and an outer ectocyst. During the pre-emergence stage, cysts are in the optimal growth medium, but do not show visible signs of trophozoite emergence. The emergence stage is marked by the appearance of a cytoplasmic bud at the ostiole, where the operculum has been removed, indicating the initiation of the amoeba’s emergence. Finally, in the post-emergence stage, free trophozoites are observed having exited the cysts and leaving behind empty cyst walls with irregularly shaped holes.
Figure 4. Main cellular steps and endogenous proteins involved in the encystment and excystment processes in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Encystment starts with the formation of the outer layer, the ectocyst, followed by the inner layer, the endocyst. Excystment is characterized by the emergence stage, when the operculum is removed and a cytoplasmic bud appears at the ostiole, and the post-emergence stage when the trophozoite is released and the remaining cyst wall disappears. The operculum and the endocyst are represented in red and green, respectively. NNMT = nicotinamide N-methyltransferase; CSP21 = Cyst-Specific Protein of 21 kDa; Sir2-like = Deacetylase; Arg-methyltransferase 5 = Arginine methyltransferase 5; RegA = AMP phosphodiesterase; PKC = Protein kinase C (from [10,43,44,54,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,85,86,87,88]).
Figure 4. Main cellular steps and endogenous proteins involved in the encystment and excystment processes in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Encystment starts with the formation of the outer layer, the ectocyst, followed by the inner layer, the endocyst. Excystment is characterized by the emergence stage, when the operculum is removed and a cytoplasmic bud appears at the ostiole, and the post-emergence stage when the trophozoite is released and the remaining cyst wall disappears. The operculum and the endocyst are represented in red and green, respectively. NNMT = nicotinamide N-methyltransferase; CSP21 = Cyst-Specific Protein of 21 kDa; Sir2-like = Deacetylase; Arg-methyltransferase 5 = Arginine methyltransferase 5; RegA = AMP phosphodiesterase; PKC = Protein kinase C (from [10,43,44,54,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,85,86,87,88]).
Pathogens 14 00268 g004
Several important observations were also noted in this study: first, trophozoites were observed emerging specifically from the ostioles, suggesting a regulated and presumably enzymatic process facilitating the removal of the operculum and subsequent emergence of the trophozoite. Second, similar to what was observed by Mattar and Byers [82], empty cyst walls remain visible for several hours after excystment initiation. Third, not all cysts excyst synchronously, suggesting variability in the timing of excystment. This could be due to differences in individual cysts’ readiness or environmental conditions.
Using mRNA sequencing, five genes were recently shown to be upregulated during excystment [86]. The silencing of these genes, by using specific siRNA, revealed an essential role for four of them (ACA1_031140, ACA1_032330, ACA1_374400, and ACA1_112650) during excystment. Among these four genes, one encodes for nicotinamide N-methyltransferase (NNMT; ACA1_112650), and the three others for hypothetical proteins. As NNMT is involved in the regulation of methylation potential, affecting DNA and histone epigenetic modifications, the authors hypothesized that this enzyme could regulate the expression of critical genes during excystment [86].
The degradation of cellulose is a critical step in the breakdown of the cyst wall during excystment and the importance of cellulases, enzymes that degrade cellulose, during this cellular process has been discussed by several works [81,87,88] indicating their pivotal role during the emergence of trophozoites from cysts. Indeed, the role of cellulases during excystment was further established by the finding that the treatment of A. castellanii cysts by exogenous cellulases at 7.5 U/mL for 24 h can stimulate the emergence of trophozoites [10]. Nevertheless, a cysticidal effect was observed on A. castellanii with high doses of cellulase from 500 U/mL to 1500 U/mL [89]. Furthermore, cyst treatment with proteases, such as pepsin and collagenase, also stimulated trophozoite emergence from cysts, but to a lower extent compared to cellulase at the same enzyme concentration [10]. Moreover, trophozoites excysted in the presence of cellulase displayed a three times shorter doubling time compared to the control in the absence of the enzyme, indicating that cyst wall degradation products generated by cellulase promote trophozoite proliferation. Moreover, no effect was observed on excystment stimulation with chitinase treatment [10], confirming the controversy for the presence, or the low accessibility, of chitin in the Acanthamoeba cyst wall [49,50,80,90]. The main cellular steps and endogenous proteins involved in both encystment and excystment processes are presented in Figure 4.
Although the precise composition of the operculum remains unclear due to isolation difficulties, it is hypothesized to contain cellulose organized differently from the rest of the cyst wall, making it a potential target for cellulases during excystment. Indeed, cellulose fibrils were previously shown to be organized in a layer-like manner and appeared unarranged and without orientation in the rest of the cyst wall [41]. The specific digestion of the operculum by cellulases during the excystment of A. castellanii, while the rest of the cyst wall remains intact, is still unresolved. One possibility is that the operculum may have a unique cellulose organization which would be more susceptible to cellulase activity than the rest of the cyst wall. Additionally, a specific localized activity of some cellulases, among the cellulase genes encoded in the A. castellanii genome, could be driven by a specific structural enzyme configuration, leading to exclusive operculum localization. Signaling mechanisms could also regulate cellulase-specific expression during encystment or excystment. The regulation of cellulase expression, both spatially and temporally, would likely direct the enzyme activity to the operculum, allowing trophozoite emergence through the ostiole and preserving, at least initially, the cyst wall integrity during the excystment process. Furthermore, the involvement of other enzymes working synergistically with cellulases, such as proteases [10], could weaken or modify the operculum, enabling the efficient emergence of trophozoites. Further research focusing on the detailed biochemical and molecular analyses of the operculum and the regulatory mechanisms governing cellulase activity would provide deeper insights into this fascinating biological process.
Although the detailed stages of excystment and key observations provided by Chambers and Thompson [85] contribute significantly to our knowledge of A. castellanii biology, future research should focus on elucidating the structural analysis of the operculum and the molecular mechanisms governing its removal and trophozoite emergence, besides cellulase activity, as well as the environmental factors influencing the timing and success of excystment.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

Understanding the complex life cycle of A. castellanii, particularly the processes of encystment and excystment, is pivotal for addressing the challenges posed by this free-living amoeba. The ability of A. castellanii to alternate between trophozoite and cyst forms underlines its remarkable adaptability and survival mechanisms, which contributes significantly to its resistance to disinfection methods.
Encystment enables A. castellanii to endure harsh environmental conditions by forming a robust cyst wall primarily composed of cellulose and other polysaccharides. This complex structure not only protects the amoeba from desiccation, extreme temperatures, and chemical agents but also complicates disinfection efforts. Insights into the biochemical and molecular mechanisms of cyst formation, particularly the role of cellulose synthase and cellulases, will reveal essential genes for this cellular process.
Excystment is less well-characterized but equally critical. Research has identified key phases and structural features of excystment, with cellulases thought to play a crucial role in the breakdown of cellulose during this process. However, the precise mechanisms regulating this process, especially the selective digestion of the operculum in Acanthamoeba sp., remain an area of active investigation.

Author Contributions

M.C. wrote the original draft; Z.F.-M. provided microscope pictures and critically revised the manuscript; A.S.-L., W.A. and S.P. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data and contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Scheid, P. Free-living amoebae as human parasites and hosts for pathogenic microorganisms. Proceedings 2018, 2, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Samba-Louaka, A.; Delafont, V.; Rodier, M.H.; Héchard, Y. Free-living amoebae and squatters in the wild: Ecological and molecular features. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 43, 415–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abdul-Majid, M.A.; Mahboob, T.; Mong, B.G.; Jaturas, N.; Richard, R.L.; Tian-Chye, T.; Phimphila, A.; Mahaphonh, P.; Aye, K.N.; Aung, W.L.; et al. Pathogenic waterborne free-living amoebae: An update from selected Southeast Asian countries. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bornier, F.; Zas, E.; Potheret, D.; Laaberki, M.H.; Coupat-Goutaland, B.; Charpentier, X. Environmental free-living amoebae can predate on diverse antibiotic-resistant human pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e0074721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shi, Y.; Queller, D.C.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yan, Q.; He, Z.; He, Z.; Wu, C.; Wang, C.; Shu, L. The ecology and evolution of amoeba-bacterium interactions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e01866-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Greub, G.; Raoult, D. Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 413–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Salah, I.B.; Ghigo, E.; Drancourt, M. Free-living amoebae, a training field for macrophage resistance of mycobacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 894–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Balczun, C.; Scheid, P.L. Free-living amoebae as hosts for and vectors of intracellular microorganisms with public health significance. Viruses 2017, 9, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lloyd, D. Encystment in Acanthamoeba castellanii: A review. Exp. Parasitol. 2014, 145, S20–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fechtali-Moute, Z.; Loiseau, P.M.; Pomel, S. Stimulation of Acanthamoeba castellanii excystment by enzyme treatment and consequences on trophozoite growth. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 982897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fouque, E.; Trouilhé, M.C.; Thomas, V.; Hartemann, P.; Rodier, M.H.; Héchard, Y. Cellular, biochemical, and molecular changes during encystment of free-living amoebae. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cirillo, J.D.; Cirillo, S.L.; Yan, L.; Bermudez, L.E.; Falkow, S.; Tompkins, L.S. Intracellular growth in Acanthamoeba castellanii affects monocyte entry mechanisms and enhances virulence of Legionella pneumophila. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 4427–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Molmeret, M.; Horn, M.; Wagner, M.; Santic, M.; Abu-Kwaik, Y. Amoebae as training grounds for intracellular bacterial pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rayamajhee, B.; Subedi, D.; Peguda, H.K.; Willcox, M.D.; Henriquez, F.L.; Carnt, N. A systematic review of intracellular microorganisms within Acanthamoeba to understand potential impact for infection. Pathogens 2021, 10, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khunkitti, W.; Lloyd, D.; Furr, J.R.; Russell, A.D. Acanthamoeba castellanii: Growth, encystment, excystment and biocide susceptibility. J. Infect. 1998, 36, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Visvesvara, G.S.; Moura, H.; Schuster, F.L. Pathogenic and opportunistic free-living amoebae: Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, Naegleria fowleri, and Sappinia diploidea. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 50, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Turner, N.A.; Russell, A.D.; Furr, J.R.; Lloyd, D. Emergence of resistance to biocides during differentiation of Acanthamoeba castellanii. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2000, 46, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Taravaud, A.; Fechtali-Moute, Z.; Loiseau, P.M.; Pomel, S. Drugs used for the treatment of cerebral and disseminated infections caused by free-living amoebae. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2021, 14, 791–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garg, D.; Daigavane, S. A comprehensive review on Acanthamoeba keratitis: An overview of epidemiology, risk factors, and therapeutic strategies. Cureus 2024, 16, e67803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Wei, Z.; Cao, K.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, Q. The global epidemiology of clinical diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. J. Infect. Public Health 2023, 16, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ortilles, A.; Belloc, J.; Rubio, E.; Fernandez, M.T.; Benito, M.; Critobal, J.A.; Calvo, B.; Goni, P. In-vitro development of an effective treatment for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 50, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bouheraoua, N.; Labbé, A.; Chaumeil, C.; Liang, Q.; Laroche, L.; Borderie, V. Acanthamoeba keratitis. J. Fr. Ophtamol. 2014, 37, 640–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Siddiqui, R.; Aqeel, Y.; Khan, N.A. The development of drugs against Acanthamoeba infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6441–6450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Franch, A.; Knutsson, K.A.; Pedrotti, E.; Fasolo, A.; Bertuzzi, F.; Birattari, F.; Bonacci, E.; Leon, P.; Papa, V. Treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis with high dose PHMB (0.08%) monotherapy in clinical practice: A case series. Eur. J. Ophthamol. 2024, 14, 11206721241299470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. European Commission Grants Marketing Authorization for Acanthamoeba Keratitis Treatment. Available online: https://www.optometrytimes.com/view/european-commission-grants-marketing-authorization-for-acanthamoeba-keratitis-treatment (accessed on 27 January 2025).
  26. Fouque, E.; Héchard, Y.; Hartemann, P.; Humeau, P.; Trouilhé, M.C. Sensitivity of Vermamoeba (Hartmanella) vermiformis cysts to conventional disinfectants and protease. J. Water Health 2015, 13, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dupuy, M.; Berne, F.; Herbelin, P.; Binet, M.; Berthelot, N.; Rodier, M.H.; Soreau, S.; Héchard, Y. Sensitivity of free-living amoeba trophozoites and cysts to water disinfectants. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2014, 217, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cervero-Arago, S.; Rodriguez-Martinez, S.; Canals, O.; Salvado, H.; Araujo, R.M. Effect of thermal treatment on free-living amoeba inactivation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krishna-Murti, C.R.; Shukla, O.P. Differentiation of pathogenic amoebae: Encystation and excystation of Acanthamoeba culbertsoni—A model. J. Biosci. 1984, 6, 475–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weisman, R.A. Differentiation in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1976, 30, 189–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Griffiths, A.J.; Hughes, D.E. Starvation and encystment of a soil amoeba Hartmanella castellanii. J. Protozool. 1968, 15, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rodriguez-Zaragoza, S. Ecology of free-living amoebae. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1994, 20, 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sriram, R.; Schoff, M.; Booton, G.; Fuerst, P.; Visvesvara, G.S. Survival of Acanthamoeba cysts after desiccation for more than 20 years. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 4045–4048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jahangeer, M.; Mahmood, Z.; Munir, N.; Waraich, U.E.A.; Mahmood-Tahir, I.; Akram, M.; Ali-Shah, S.M.; Zulfqar, A.; Zainab, R. Naegleria fowleri: Sources of infection, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management; a review. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2020, 47, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Coulon, C.; Collignon, A.; McDonnell, G.; Thomas, V. Resistance of Acanthamoeba cysts to disinfection treatments used in health care settings. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 2689–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Aksozek, A.; McClellan, K.; Howard, K.; Niederkorn, J.Y.; Alizadeh, H. Resistance of Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts to physical, chemical, and radiological conditions. J. Parasitol. 2002, 88, 621–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thomas, V.; Loret, J.F.; Jousset, M.; Greub, G. Biodiversity of amoebae and amoebae-resisting bacteria in a drinking water treatment plant. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 2728–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marciano-Cabral, F.; Jamerson, M.; Kaneshiro, E.S. Free-living amoebae, Legionella and Mycobacterium in tap water supplied by a municipal drinking water utility in the USA. J. Water Health 2010, 8, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Taravaud, A.; Ali, M.; Lafosse, B.; Nicolas, V.; Féliers, C.; Thibert, S.; Lévi, Y.; Loiseau, P.M.; Pomel, S. Enrichment of free-living amoebae in biofilms developed at upper water levels in drinking water storage towers: An inter- and intra-seasonal study. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fechtali-Moute, Z.; Pomel, S. Influence of the age of free-living amoeba cysts on their vertical distribution in a water column. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Garajova, M.; Mrva, M.; Vaskonicova, N.; Martinka, M.; Melicherova, J.; Valigurova, A. Cellulose fibrils formation and organisation of cytoskeleton during encystment are essential for Acanthamoeba cyst wall architecture. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Upadhyay, J.M.; Crow, S.; Cox, A. The cyst wall composition of Harmanella glebae. Proc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1984, 175, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bernard, C.; Locard-Paulet, M.; Noël, C.; Duchateau, M.; Giai Gianetto, Q.; Moumen, B.; Rattei, T.; Héchard, Y.; Jensen, L.J.; Matondo, M.; et al. A time-resolved multi-omics atlas of Acanthamoeba castellanii encystment. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Aqeel, Y.; Siddiqui, R.; Khan, N.A. Silencing of xylose isomerase and cellulose synthase by siRNA inhibits encystation in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Du, Q.; Schaap, P. The social amoeba Polysphondylium pallidum loses encystation and sporulation, but can still erect fruiting bodies in the absence of cellulose. Protist 2014, 165, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Samuelson, J.; Bushkin, G.G.; Chatterjee, A.; Robbins, P.W. Strategies to discover the structural components of cyst and oocyst wals. Eukaryot. Cell 2013, 12, 1578–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Maurer-Alcala, X.X.; Yan, Y. How ciliated protists survive by cysts: Come key points during encystment and excystment. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 785502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Aguilar-Diaz, H.; Carrero, J.C.; Argüello-Garcia, R.; Laclette, J.P.; Morales-Montor, J. Cyst and encystment in protozoan parasites: Optimal targets for new life-cycle interrupting strategies. Trends Parasitol. 2011, 27, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Magistrado-Coxen, P.; Aqeel, Y.; Lopez, A.; Haserick, J.R.; Urbanowicz, B.R.; Costello, C.E.; Samuelson, J. The most abundant cyst wall proteins of Acanthamoeba castellanii are lectins that bind cellulose and localize to distinct structures in developing and mature cyst walls. PLoS Neglect. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kanakapura-Sundararaj, B.; Goyal, M.; Samuelson, J. Cellulose binding and the timing of expression influence protein targeting to the double-layered cyst wall of Acanthamoeba. mSphere 2024, 9, e0046624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Samba-Louaka, A. Encystment of free-living amoebae, so many blind spots to cover. Parasitologia 2023, 3, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chavez-Munguia, B.; Salazar-Villatoro, L.; Lagunes-Guillen, A.; Omana-Molina, M.; Espinosa-Cantellano, M.; Martinez-Palomo, A. Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts: New ultrastructural findings. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 1125–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bowers, B.; Korn, E.D. The fine structure of Acanthamoeba castellanii (Neff strain). II. Encystment. J. Cell Biol. 1969, 41, 786–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chavez-Munguia, B.; Omana-Molina, M.; Gonzalez-Lazaro, M.; Gonzalez-Robles, A.; Bonilla, P.; Martinez-Palomo, A. Ultrastructural study of encystation and excystation in Acanthamoeba castellanii. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2005, 52, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lemgruber, L.; Lupetti, P.; de Souza, W.; Vommaro, R.C.; da Rocha-Azevedo, B. The fine structure of the Acanthamoeba polyphaga cyst wall. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 305, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dudley, R.; Jarroll, E.L.; Khan, N.A. Carbohydrate analysis of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Exp. Parasitol. 2009, 122, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dudley, R.; Alsam, S.; Khan, N.A. Cellulose biosynthesis pathway is a potential target in the improved treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 75, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Moon, E.K.; Chung, D.I.; Hong, Y.C.; Kong, H.H. Differentially expressed genes of Acanthamoeba castellanii during encystation. Korean. J. Parasitol. 2007, 45, 283–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bouyer, S.; Rodier, M.H.; Guillot, A.; Héchard, Y. Acanthamoeba castellanii: Proteins involved in actin dynamics, glycolysis, and proteolysis are regulated during encystation. Exp. Parasitol. 2009, 123, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Moon, E.K.; Chung, D.I.; Hong, Y.C.; Kong, H.H. Autophagy protein 8 mediating autophagosome in encysting Acanthamoeba. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2009, 168, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moon, E.K.; Chung, D.I.; Hong, Y.; Kong, H.H. Atg3-mediated lipidation of Atg8 is involved in encystation of Acanthamoeba. Korean J. Parasitol. 2011, 49, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moon, E.K.; Hong, Y.; Chung, D.I.; Kong, H.H. Identification of Atg8 isoform in encysting Acanthamoeba. Korean J. Parasitol. 2013, 51, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Song, S.M.; Han, B.I.; Moon, E.K.; Lee, Y.R.; Yu, H.S.; Jha, B.K.; Sylvatrie-Danne, D.B.; Kong, H.H.; Chung, D.I.; Hong, Y. Autophagy protein 16-mediated autophagy is required for the encystation of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2012, 183, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Samba-Louaka, A.; Labruyere, E.; Matondo, M.; Locard-Paulet, M.; Olivo-Marin, J.C.; Guillen, N. Encystation and stress responses under the control of ubiquitin-like proteins in pathogenic amoebae. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hirukawa, Y.; Nakato, H.; Izumi, S.; Tsuruhara, T.; Tomino, S. Structure and expression of a cyst specific protein of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1398, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Moon, E.K.; Chung, D.I.; Hong, Y.C.; Kong, H.H. Characterization of a serine proteinase mediating encystation of Acanthamoeba. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 1513–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Leitsch, D.; Köhsler, M.; Marchetti-Deschmann, M.; Deutsch, A.; Allmaier, G.; Duchêne, M.; Walochnik, J. Major role for cysteine proteases during early phase of Acanthamoeba castellanii encystment. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Moon, E.K.; Hong, Y.; Chung, D.I.; Kong, H.H. Cysteine protease involving in autophagosomal degradation of mitochondria during encystation of Acanthamoeba. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2012, 185, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lee, Y.R.; Na, B.K.; Moon, E.K.; Song, S.M.; Joo, S.Y.; Kong, H.H.; Goo, Y.K.; Chung, D.I.; Hong, Y. Essential role for an M17 leucine aminopeptidase in encystation of Acanthamoeba castellanii. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Joo, S.Y.; Aung, J.M.; Shin, M.; Moon, E.K.; Goo, Y.K.; Chung, D.I.; Hong, Y. The role of the Acanthamoeba castellanii Sir2-like protein in the growth and encystation of Acanthamoeba. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rolland, S.; Mengue, L.; Noël, C.; Crapart, S.; Mercier, A.; Aucher, W.; Héchard, Y.; Samba-Louaka, A. Encystment induces down-regulation of acetyltransferase-like gene in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Pathogens 2020, 9, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Moon, E.K.; Hong, Y.; Chung, D.I.; Goo, Y.K.; Kong, H.H. Identification of protein arginine methyltransferase 5 as a regulator for encystation of Acanthamoeba. Korean J. Parasitol. 2016, 54, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Du, Q.; Schilde, C.; Birgersson, E.; Chen, Z.H.; McElroy, S.; Schaap, P. The cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase RegA critically regulated encystation in social and pathogenic amoebas. Cell. Signal. 2014, 26, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Moon, E.K.; Chung, D.I.; Hong, Y.; Kong, H.H. Protein kinase C signaling molecules regulate encystation of Acanthamoeba. Exp. Parasitol. 2012, 132, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lorenzo-Morales, J.; Kliescikova, J.; Martinez-Carretero, E.; de Pablos, L.M.; Profotova, B.; Nohynkova, E.; Osuna, A.; Valladares, B. Glycogen phosphorylase in Acanthamoeba spp.: Determining the role of the enzyme during the encystment process using RNA interference. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Moon, E.K.; Kong, H.H. Short-cut pathway to synthesize cellulose of encysting Acanthamoeba. Korean J. Parasitol. 2012, 50, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Stewart, J.R.; Weisman, R.A. A chemical and autoradiographic study of cellulose synthesis during the encystment of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1974, 161, 488–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Griffiths, A.J.; Hughes, D.E. The physiology of encystment of Hartmanella castellanii. J. Protozool. 1969, 16, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moon, E.K.; Hong, Y.; Chung, D.I.; Goo, Y.K.; Kong, H.H. Down regulation of cellulose synthase inhibits the formation of endocysts in Acanthamoeba. Korean J. Parasitol. 2014, 52, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Derda, M.; Winiecka-Krusnell, J.; Linder, M.B.; Linder, E. Labeled Trichoderma reesei cellulase as a marker for Acanthamoeba cyst wall cellulose in infected tissues. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6827–6830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Deichmann, U.; Jantzen, H. The cellulase enzyme system during growth and development of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Arch. Microbiol. 1977, 113, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mattar, F.E.; Byers, T.J. Morphological changes and the requirements for macromolecule synthesis during excystment of Acanthamoeba castellanii. J. Cell. Biol. 1971, 49, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Stratford, M.P.; Griffiths, A.J. Excystment of the amoeba Hartmanella castellanii. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1971, 66, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kaushal, D.C.; Shukla, O.P. Excystment of axenically prepared cysts of Hartmanella culbertsoni. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977, 98, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chambers, J.A.; Thompson, J.E. A scanning electron microscopic study of the excystment process of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Exp. Cell Res. 1972, 73, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kim, M.J.; Jo, H.J.; Quan, F.S.; Chu, K.B.; Kong, H.H.; Moon, E.K. Identification of essential genes for Acanthamoeba castellanii excystation during encystation and excystation. Parasites Hosts Dis. 2024, 62, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lakhundi, S.; Siddiqui, R.; Khan, N.A. Cellulose degradation: A therapeutic strategy in the improved treatment of Acanthamoeba infections. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Baig, A.M.; Khan, N.A.; Katyara, P.; Lalani, S.; Baig, R.; Nadeem, M.; Akbar, N.; Nazim, F.; Khaleeq, A. “Targeting the feast of a sleeping beast”: Nutrient and mineral dependencies of encysted Acanthamoeba castellanii. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2021, 97, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Lazuana, T.; Astuty, H.; Sari, I.P. Effect of cellulase enzyme treatment on cyst wall degradation of Acanthamoeba sp. J. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 2019, 8915314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Linder, M.; Winiecka-Krusnell, J.; Linder, E. Use of recombinant cellulose-binding domains of Trichoderma reesei cellulase as a selective immunocytochemical marker for cellulose in protozoa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2503–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phase contrast images of Acanthamoeba castellanii. (A) Trophozoite presenting acanthopodia (a) allowing mobility, with several vacuoles (V) around the nucleus (N) presenting a nucleolus (n) in its center. (B) Two cysts characterized by a double layer with the outermost ectocyst (Ec) and the innermost polygonal endocyst (En). These two layers are connected at the ostiole (o). Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 1. Phase contrast images of Acanthamoeba castellanii. (A) Trophozoite presenting acanthopodia (a) allowing mobility, with several vacuoles (V) around the nucleus (N) presenting a nucleolus (n) in its center. (B) Two cysts characterized by a double layer with the outermost ectocyst (Ec) and the innermost polygonal endocyst (En). These two layers are connected at the ostiole (o). Scale bar = 10 µm.
Pathogens 14 00268 g001
Figure 2. Transmission electron microscopy image of a cyst of Acanthamoeba castellanii. The cyst wall of A. castellanii is composed of two layers, the inner endocyst (En) and the outer ectocyst (Ec), separated by the intercystic space (IS). Scale bar = 2 µm. (Adapted from [10]).
Figure 2. Transmission electron microscopy image of a cyst of Acanthamoeba castellanii. The cyst wall of A. castellanii is composed of two layers, the inner endocyst (En) and the outer ectocyst (Ec), separated by the intercystic space (IS). Scale bar = 2 µm. (Adapted from [10]).
Pathogens 14 00268 g002
Figure 3. Illustration depicting the different layers of the Acanthamoeba castellanii cell wall. (A) A. castellanii cyst shows ectocyst and endocyst (in green) separated by an intercystic space. The two layers are closely apposed at the ostiole which is covered by a cap, named the operculum (in red). (B) The cyst wall contains structural sugar polymers (cellulose, glucans, putative chitin) associated with proteins such as lectins.
Figure 3. Illustration depicting the different layers of the Acanthamoeba castellanii cell wall. (A) A. castellanii cyst shows ectocyst and endocyst (in green) separated by an intercystic space. The two layers are closely apposed at the ostiole which is covered by a cap, named the operculum (in red). (B) The cyst wall contains structural sugar polymers (cellulose, glucans, putative chitin) associated with proteins such as lectins.
Pathogens 14 00268 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choaji, M.; Samba-Louaka, A.; Fechtali-Moute, Z.; Aucher, W.; Pomel, S. Encystment and Excystment Processes in Acanthamoeba castellanii: An Emphasis on Cellulose Involvement. Pathogens 2025, 14, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030268

AMA Style

Choaji M, Samba-Louaka A, Fechtali-Moute Z, Aucher W, Pomel S. Encystment and Excystment Processes in Acanthamoeba castellanii: An Emphasis on Cellulose Involvement. Pathogens. 2025; 14(3):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choaji, Mathew, Ascel Samba-Louaka, Zineb Fechtali-Moute, Willy Aucher, and Sébastien Pomel. 2025. "Encystment and Excystment Processes in Acanthamoeba castellanii: An Emphasis on Cellulose Involvement" Pathogens 14, no. 3: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030268

APA Style

Choaji, M., Samba-Louaka, A., Fechtali-Moute, Z., Aucher, W., & Pomel, S. (2025). Encystment and Excystment Processes in Acanthamoeba castellanii: An Emphasis on Cellulose Involvement. Pathogens, 14(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop