Next Article in Journal
Rhipicephalus microplus and Its Impact on Anaplasma marginale Multistrain Infections in Contrasting Epidemiological Contexts
Previous Article in Journal
Determination and Characterization of (Novel) Circulating Strains of Brucella sp. Within the National Bovine Brucellosis Control Program in Ecuador
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Unseen Dangers—The Role of Invasive Species in the Spread of Zoonotic Diseases in Europe

by
Myriam Kratou
1,* and
Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz
2,*
1
Laboratory of Microbiology, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Manouba 2010, Tunisia
2
ANSES, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, UMR BIPAR, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2025, 14(2), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14020159
Submission received: 26 January 2025 / Accepted: 4 February 2025 / Published: 7 February 2025
In a recent study, Klink et al. [1] investigated the potential of raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and raccoons (Procyon lotor) as reservoirs and vectors for vector-borne and zoonotic pathogens in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. These invasive species, native to East Asia and North America, respectively, have adapted to European ecosystems [2], raising concerns for human and animal health. The study screened these animals for pathogens such as Leptospira, Rickettsia, and Borreliella spp., with findings that shed light on their capacity to harbor and potentially spread infectious agents.
Raccoon dogs and raccoons exhibit key traits such as high adaptability [3,4], omnivorous diets [5], and rapid reproduction that contribute to their success as invasive species in Europe [6]. These characteristics disrupt local biodiversity and facilitate interactions with native wildlife and domestic animals [7,8], potentially increasing the risk of disease transmission [9]. While both species show similarities in pathogen infection patterns, raccoon dogs tend to inhabit natural environments, including forests, wetlands, and rural areas, avoiding densely populated urban centers [10,11]. This preference for non-urban areas reduces direct human contact, but increases interactions with wildlife reservoirs of pathogens [4]. These animals often share dens with species such as badgers and foxes [12], increasing their exposure to ectoparasites like ticks, vectors of pathogens like Borreliella spp. that cause Lyme disease [13] and Rickettsia spp., which leads to rickettsiosis [14,15,16]. Their omnivorous diet, which includes small mammals, amphibians, insects, and plants, also raises their likelihood of encountering pathogens like Leptospira spp. and other rodent-borne diseases [5,12]. On the other hand, raccoons are highly adaptable, and commonly inhabit urban and suburban areas, bringing them into closer contact with humans and domestic animals compared to raccoon dogs [17]. This proximity elevates the risk of zoonotic disease transmission [1]. While raccoons frequently forage in areas with high tick densities, their interactions with large wildlife are relatively limited. Moreover, as omnivores, raccoons exhibit opportunistic feeding behaviors, often scavenging in garbage and human food waste [18,19]. This feeding strategy increases their exposure to pathogens associated with human environments, such as Leptospira spp. and Salmonella [20,21].
The study by Klink et al. [1] highlighted differences in the roles of raccoon dogs and raccoons as carriers of Leptospira spp. and tick-borne pathogens. Their study found Leptospira spp., a bacterial pathogen responsible for severe leptospirosis in humans [22], in approximately 19% of raccoon dogs and 7% of raccoons, underscoring the need for monitoring these populations for zoonotic threats [1]. Raccoon dogs exhibited a nearly threefold higher infection rate than raccoons, which may be linked to their dietary habits, involving more predation on small mammals, increasing their exposure to rodent-borne pathogens such as hantaviruses, Toxoplasma gondii, and Leptospira spp [23,24]. Additionally, the greater susceptibility of juvenile raccoon dogs to Leptospira suggests that these animals may act as reservoirs, shedding the bacteria into the environment, potentially contaminating soil and water, which can spread the infection to humans, livestock, and other wildlife [25,26].
In their examination of tick-borne pathogens, Klink et al. [1] found a notably low prevalence of Borreliella afzelii, a key agent of Lyme disease in Europe, and no infections of Rickettsia spp. in either raccoon dogs or raccoons. This low detection rate is intriguing, especially considering that only one individual from each species tested positive for Borreliella spp., and no Rickettsia infections were found. Such findings may suggest a limited role for these animals in the ecology of these pathogens, at least within the sampled population in Schleswig-Holstein. However, the ecological implications are profound, given the observed behavioral overlap where both species share dens with native predators such as red foxes and badgers [12]. This interspecies interaction could potentially enhance the exchange of ectoparasites, including ticks, thereby facilitating the broader transmission dynamics of tick-borne diseases across different wildlife populations.
As Klink et al. [1] emphasized, long-term health monitoring of raccoon dogs and raccoons is essential for understanding and managing their roles in zoonotic disease transmission. These invasive species play complex roles in host–pathogen ecosystems, necessitating detailed investigations to unravel observed nonlinearities and to develop adaptive management strategies that address each species’ specific contributions to pathogen ecology [27]. In order to maximize the impact of these strategies, future studies should investigate the effects of co-infection and combined infestations on raccoon dogs and raccoons. As shown by Klink et al. [1], these species were primarily infected with ticks, but also harbored fleas, lice, and louse flies, which can carry a range of pathogens [28,29,30]. Concurrent infestations with these insects increase the risk of multiple pathogen carriage, leading to co-infections [31,32]. For example, Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague, primarily transmitted by fleas, can result in bubonic, septicemic, or pneumonic plague [33]. These co-infections may increase the reservoir competence of raccoon dogs and raccoons for multiple pathogens, promoting pathogen transmission within and between species, and elevating the risk of outbreaks impacting wildlife, domestic animals, and humans [34]. Furthermore, ectoparasites may detach from their hosts post-mortem, especially during transport and handling, potentially leading to underestimation of infestation rates [35]. This detachment can distort data on parasite loads, obscure pathogen exposures, and complicate the understanding of vector–host relationships. Detached ectoparasites may still harbor significant pathogen loads, contributing to co-infection scenarios or independent transmission cycles, reducing opportunities to detect and study vector-borne pathogens [35]. Advanced molecular techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), can be employed to identify the full spectrum of pathogens in collected samples, including emerging or underexplored pathogens [36]. These methods can uncover hidden or co-occurring infections and provide a comprehensive understanding of the microbiota in raccoon dogs and raccoons, offering valuable insights into a profile of pathogen interactions [37].
In summary, Klink et al. [1] highlight the complex challenges posed by the invasive species raccoon dogs and raccoons in host–pathogen ecosystems. Both species play distinct, yet interconnected, roles in pathogen ecology, as their association with ticks contributes to local tick populations and the potential transmission of Lyme disease and other tick- and rodent-borne pathogens. Advancing our understanding of how raccoon dogs and raccoons influence the epidemiology of Leptospira and tick-borne diseases through research and collaboration will enable better anticipation and mitigation of the risks these species pose to humans, animals, and ecosystems.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Klink, J.C.; Rieger, A.; Wohlsein, P.; Siebert, U.; Obiegala, A. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Pathogens in Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and Raccoons (Procyon lotor) from Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Pathogens 2024, 13, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Laurimaa, L.; Süld, K.; Moks, E.; Valdmann, H.; Umhang, G.; Knapp, J.; Saarma, U. First Report of the Zoonotic Tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis in Raccoon Dogs in Estonia, and Comparisons with Other Countries in Europe. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beltrán-Beck, B.; García, F.J.; Gortázar, C. Raccoons in Europe: Disease Hazards due to the Establishment of an Invasive Species. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2011, 58, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sutor, A.; Schwarz, S.; Conraths, F.J. The Biological Potential of the Raccoon Dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides, Gray 1834) as an Invasive Species in Europe—New Risks for Disease Spread? Acta Theriol. 2013, 59, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sutor, A.; Kauhala, K.; Ansorge, H. Diet of the Raccoon Dog Nyctereutes procyonoides—A Canid with an Opportunistic Foraging Strategy. Acta Theriol. 2010, 55, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kauhala, K.; Schregel, J.; Auttila, M. Habitat Impact on Raccoon Dog Nyctereutes procyonoides Home Range Size in Southern Finland. Acta Theriol. 2010, 55, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Daszak, P. Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife—Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health. Science 2000, 287, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alvarado-Rybak, M.; Solano-Gallego, L.; Millán, J. A Review of Piroplasmid Infections in Wild Carnivores Worldwide: Importance for Domestic Animal Health and Wildlife Conservation. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Duscher, T.; Hodžić, A.; Glawischnig, W.; Duscher, G.G. The Raccoon Dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and the Raccoon (Procyon lotor)—Their Role and Impact of Maintaining and Transmitting Zoonotic Diseases in Austria, Central Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 1411–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Drygala, F.; Stier, N.; Zoller, H.; Mix, H.M.; Bögelsack, K.; Roth, M. Spatial Organisation and Intra—Specific Relationship of the Raccoon Dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Central Europe. Wildl. Biol. 2008, 14, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Süld, K.; Saarma, U.; Valdmann, H. Home Ranges of Raccoon Dogs in Managed and Natural Areas. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Elmeros, M.; Mikkelsen, D.M.G.; Nørgaard, L.S.; Pertoldi, C.; Jensen, T.H.; Chriél, M. The Diet of Feral Raccoon Dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and Native Badger (Meles meles) and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Denmark. Mammal Res. 2018, 63, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wodecka, B.; Michalik, J.; Lane, R.S.; Nowak-Chmura, M.; Wierzbicka, A. Differential Associations of Borrelia Species with European Badgers (Meles meles) and Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Western Poland. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 1010–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Camer, G.A.; Lim, C.W. Detection of Spotted Fever and Typhus Group Rickettsial Infection in Wild Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides Koreensis) in Chonbuk Province, Korea. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2008, 39, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kang, J.-G.; Lee, H.; Chae, J.-S.; Park, B.-K.; Park, J.; Yu, D.-H.; Shin, N.-S.; Jo, Y.-S.; Cho, Y.-K.; Choi, K.-S.; et al. Molecular Detection of Anaplasma, Bartonella, and Borrelia theileri in Raccoon Dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Korea. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Levett, P.N. Leptospirosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 296–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stope, M.B. The Raccoon (Procyon lotor) as a Neozoon in Europe. Animals 2023, 13, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lotze, J.-H.; Anderson, S.  Procyon lotor. Mamm. Species 1979, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schulte-Hostedde, A.I.; Mazal, Z.; Jardine, C.M.; Gagnon, J. Enhanced Access to Anthropogenic Food Waste Is Related to Hyperglycemia in Raccoons (Procyon lotor). Conserv. Physiol. 2018, 6, coy026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reinhardt, N.P.; Köster, J.; Thomas, A.; Arnold, J.; Fux, R.; Straubinger, R.K. Bacterial and Viral Pathogens with One Health Relevance in Invasive Raccoons (Procyon lotor, Linné 1758) in Southwest Germany. Pathogens 2023, 12, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bigler, W.J.; Hoff, G.L.; Jasmin, A.M.; White, F.H. Salmonella Infections in Florida Raccoons, Procyon Btor. Arch. Environ. Health Int. J. 1974, 28, 261–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yamashita, R.; Yoshida, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Uomoto, S.; Shimizu, S.; Takesue, K.; Maeda, N.; Hara, E.; Ohshima, K.; Zeng, W.; et al. Leptospiral Meningoencephalitis in a Raccoon Dog. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2021, 33, 1137–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Reidinger, R.F.; Miller, J.E. Wildlife Damage Management; JHU Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2013; ISBN 9781421409450. [Google Scholar]
  24. Guterres, A.; de Lemos, E.R.S. Hantaviruses and a Neglected Environmental Determinant. One Health 2018, 5, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Keller, R.P.; Geist, J.; Jeschke, J.M.; Kühn, I. Invasive Species in Europe: Ecology, Status, and Policy. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2011, 23, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lombardo, A.; Brocherel, G.; Donnini, C.; Fichi, G.; Mariacher, A.; Diaconu, E.L.; Carfora, V.; Battisti, A.; Cappai, N.; Mattioli, L.; et al. First Report of the Zoonotic Nematode Baylisascaris procyonis in Non-Native Raccoons (Procyon lotor) from Italy. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Roy, H.E.; Tricarico, E.; Hassall, R.; Johns, C.A.; Roy, K.A.; Scalera, R.; Smith, K.G.; Purse, B.V. The Role of Invasive Alien Species in the Emergence and Spread of Zoonoses. Biol. Invasions 2023, 25, 1249–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fedele, K.; Poh, K.C.; Brown, J.E.; Jones, A.; Durden, L.A.; Tiffin, H.S.; Pagac, A.; Li, A.Y.; Machtinger, E.T. Host Distribution and Pathogen Infection of Fleas (Siphonaptera) Recovered from Small Mammals in Pennsylvania. J. Vector Ecol. 2020, 45, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reeves, W.K.; Szumlas, D.E.; Moriarity, J.R.; Loftis, A.D.; Abbassy, M.M.; Helmy, I.M.; Dasch, G.A. LOUSE-BORNE BACTERIAL PATHOGENS in LICE (PHTHIRAPTERA) of RODENTS and CATTLE from EGYPT. J. Parasitol. 2006, 92, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pena-Espinoza, M.; Em, D.; Shahi-Barogh, B.; Berer, D.; Duscher, G.G.; van der Vloedt, L.; Glawischnig, W.; Rehbein, S.; Harl, J.; Unterköfler, M.S.; et al. Molecular Pathogen Screening of Louse Flies (Diptera: Hippoboscidae) from Domestic and Wild Ruminants in Austria. Parasites Vectors 2023, 16, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Otranto, D.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Managing Canine Vector-Borne Diseases of Zoonotic Concern: Part Two. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Serrano, E.; Millán, J. What Is the Price of Neglecting Parasite Groups When Assessing the Cost of Co-Infection? Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 142, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hinnebusch, B.J.; Erickson, D.L. Yersinia Pestis Biofilm in the Flea Vector and Its Role in the Transmission of Plague. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 322, 229–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kauhala, K.; Kowalczyk, R. Invasion of the Raccoon Dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Europe: History of Colonization, Features behind Its Success, and Threats to Native Fauna. Curr. Zool. 2011, 57, 584–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chew, X.Z.; Cobcroft, J.; Hutson, K.S. Fish Ectoparasite Detection, Collection and Curation. Adv. Parasitol. 2024, 125, 105–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nafea, A.M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Salama, A.M.; Aziz, M.A.; Xu, S.; Tong, Y. Application of Next-Generation Sequencing to Identify Different Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1329330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cabezas-Cruz, A.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Rego, R.O.M.; De la Fuente, J. Tick-Pathogen Ensembles: Do Molecular Interactions Lead Ecological Innovation? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kratou, M.; Cabezas-Cruz, A. Unseen Dangers—The Role of Invasive Species in the Spread of Zoonotic Diseases in Europe. Pathogens 2025, 14, 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14020159

AMA Style

Kratou M, Cabezas-Cruz A. Unseen Dangers—The Role of Invasive Species in the Spread of Zoonotic Diseases in Europe. Pathogens. 2025; 14(2):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14020159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kratou, Myriam, and Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz. 2025. "Unseen Dangers—The Role of Invasive Species in the Spread of Zoonotic Diseases in Europe" Pathogens 14, no. 2: 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14020159

APA Style

Kratou, M., & Cabezas-Cruz, A. (2025). Unseen Dangers—The Role of Invasive Species in the Spread of Zoonotic Diseases in Europe. Pathogens, 14(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14020159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop