Bioinformatic Identification of CRISPR–Cas Systems in Leptospira Genus: An Update on Their Distribution Across 77 Species

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a globally distributed zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic bacteria of the Leptospira genus. Genome editing in Leptospira has been difficult to perform. Currently, the functionality of the CRISPR-Cas system has been demonstrated in species such as Leptospira interrogans. However, the different CRISPR-Cas systems present in most of the 77 species are unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify these arrays across the genomes of all described Leptospira species using bioinformatics tools. Methods: a bioinformatics workflow was followed: genomes were downloaded from the NCBI database; Cas protein detection was carried out using the CRISPR-CasFinder and RAST web servers; functional analyses of Cas proteins were performed with InterProScan, ProtParam, Swiss Model, Alphafold3, Swiss PDB Viewer, and Pymol; conservation pattern detection was conducted using MEGA12, and Seqlogos; spacer identification was carried out with the Actinobacteriophages database and BLAST version 1.4.0; and bacteriophage detection was performed using PHASTER, and PHASTEST. Results: Cas proteins were detected in 36 out of the 77 species of the Leptospira species, including Cas1 to Cas9 and Cas12. These proteins were classified into Class 1 and Class 2 systems, corresponding to types I, II, and V. Direct repeats and spacers were detected in 19 species, with the direct repeats exhibiting two conserved nucleotide motifs. Analysis of spacer sequences revealed 323 distinct bacteriophages. Additionally, three intact bacteriophages were detected in the genomes of four Leptospira species. Notably, two saprophytic species have complete CRISPR-Cas systems. Conclusions: The presence of Cas proteins, direct repeats, and spacer sequences with homology to bacteriophage genomes provides evidence for a functional CRISPR-Cas system in at least 19 species.

1. Introduction

Leptospirosis is a globally distributed zoonosis disease caused by pathogenic bacteria of the Leptospira genus [1]. The disease affects wild and domestic animals, and the bacteria can survive in moist soils and environmental water sources for long periods of time. Moreover, humans are considered accidental hosts of the disease [2]. Leptospirosis is considered a neglected disease that occurs primarily in tropical regions of developing countries [3]. Outbreaks of the disease have been associated with occupations involving animal handling, flooding, environmental disasters, extreme climate change, water sports, prolonged exposure to environmental water sources, and wet soils [4]. Additionally, in endemic regions, severe forms such as Weil’s disease and severe pulmonary hemorrhage syndrome have emerged as the leading cause of fatal cases [5]. Epidemiological studies have estimated that 1.03 million cases and 58,900 deaths occur worldwide each year due to leptospirosis [6]. Currently, the Leptospira genus comprises 77 genomic species, which are distributed into pathogenic subgroups (P1 and P2) and saprophytic subgroups (S1 and S2) [7,8,9,10,11,12].

Genome editing in Leptospira has been difficult to perform because the bacteria grow slowly in culture media (liquid and solid) and have high nutritional requirements [13]. Gene editing techniques such as random transposon mutagenesis [14,15,16,17], suicide plasmids [18], allelic exchange [19], and shuttle vectors [20] have been used in the Leptospira genus. However, these techniques are inefficient, laborious, expensive, and difficult to implement [13]. The lack of efficient gene-editing tools in Leptospira has hindered research on hypothetical proteins, pathogenicity mechanisms, virulence factors, and key proteins for drug and vaccine development. Therefore, generating knockout mutant strains remains challenging.

However, the CRISPR-Cas system (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats—associated with Cas proteins) has emerged as a novel tool that is highly specific, efficient, easy to design and implement, broadly applicable to bacterial species, and cost-effective [21,22,23]. Additionally, multiple classes, types, subtype, variants, and molecular targets of CRISPR-Cas systems have been described in other bacterial species [24,25,26]. The CRISPR-Cas system is an adaptive immune mechanism in prokaryotes that prevents phage and plasmid infections by storing immunological memory in DNA fragments (spacers). These spacers are integrated into the host chromosome and regularly separated by direct repeats, forming CRISPR arrays adjacent to the leader sequence. These arrays are typically located near genes encoding Cas proteins [27,28,29]. Such proteins are responsible for detecting, cleaving and storing foreign genetic material from bacteriophages or plasmids, which can later serve as molecular guides complementary to the genomic sequences of these invaders during future infections [30,31,32]. The CRISPR-Cas system functions through three main steps: adaptation, expression, and interference. During adaptation (also called insertion or acquisition), foreign genetic material from bacteriophages or plasmids is recognized, cleaved into small fragments, and incorporated in the CRISPR array near the leader sequence. Expression consists of the transcription of the CRISPR locus into precursor RNAs (pre-crRNA), which are subsequently processed into mature CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs). Finally, in the interference step, mature crRNAs associate with multiprotein effector complexes or single effector proteins, which recognize identical or similar sequences in the genomes of invading viruses or plasmids and cleave them to prevent infection [33,34]. This system has been emulated, modified, and adapted as a genome-editing tool in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells [35,36]. Therefore, investigating the presence and diversity of these endogenous systems in the genomes of the Leptospira genus is of particular interest.

In recent years, significant progress has been made in applying CRISPR-Cas-based gene silencing to the genus Leptospira, including the detection of subtypes IB, and IC in pathogenic species [37,38,39]. Additionally, it has been shown that these subtypes are transcriptionally active [40], form interference complexes and different protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) have been evaluated to optimize cutting sites [41], and process immature RNAs (Pre-crRNA) [42]. Furthermore, Cas1, Cas2, Cas4, Cas5, and Cas6 proteins have been biologically and functionally characterized [37,38,39,40,42,43,44]. The first attempts at gene silencing were unsuccessful, because the Cas9 protein includes double-strand breaks in DNA that are lethal to Leptospira cells [13,45,46]. Therefore, techniques such as CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) [13], CRISPR-Cas9/non-homologous end-joining components (NHEJ) [45], and CRISPR-prime editing [46] have been developed, and successfully used to generate knock-out mutants of multiple proteins in both pathogenic and saprophytic Leptospira species. Interestingly, the analysis of the spacer sequences detected in the genomes of Leptospira interrogans corresponds to mobile genetic elements, indicating their functionality and importance in the adaptive immune defense of the bacteria [47]. In parallel, applications based on the components of the CRISPR-Cas system have been used as diagnostic tools, including a CRISPR dFnCas9-based quantitative lateral flow immunoassay and CRISPR/Cas12a platform combined with isothermal amplification [48]. Additionally, the nucleotide variability of CRISPR-Cas systems in the Leptospira genus has been used as a taxonomic tool for the identification and differentiation of species and serovars in 18 Leptospira species [47].

However, little information is available regarding the presence, diversity, and functionality of the CRISPR-Cas machinery, including CAS proteins, spacers, direct repeats, leader sequences, crRNA, and protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs), across all species of the Leptospira genus. Therefore, the objective of this research was to identify the different CRISPR-Cas systems in the 77 species of the Leptospira genus. This knowledge may contribute to optimizing gene-editing approaches and to elucidate the biological function of the many proteins that remain hypothetical in Leptospira.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Downloading Reference Genomes

A reference genome for each of the 77 Leptospira species was downloaded from the NCBI-Genome database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=171, accessed on 15 July 2025). Genomes were grouped according to established subgroups (P1, P2, S1, and S2). For each species, the sequences of the two chromosomes (three in some saprophytic species) were concatenated into a continuous linear sequence using the CAT command in the Linux operating system (Ubuntu 24.04 LTS). Genomes were then organized by species subgroups, and the genomic characteristics (species names, clade, accession number, genome size (Mb), GC content (%), number of genes, proteins, and non-coding sequence) were annotated with Prokka v1.14.5 (https://github.com/tseemann/prokka, accessed on 15 July 2025), Pseudopipe (https://github.com/mosilab/pseudopipe, accessed on 15 July 2025), Pseudofinder (https://github.com/filip-husnik/pseudofinder, accessed on 15 July 2025), and RetroScan (https://github.com/Vicky123wzy/RetroScan, accessed on 15 July 2025) [49]. Finally, the genomic characteristics of the different species were compared.

2.2. Cas Proteins Detection

The concatenated sequences of each of the 77 species of the Leptospira genus were analyzed using the web server RAST (Rapid Annotations using Subsystem Technology) (https://rast.nmpdr.org/rast.cgi, accessed on 15 July 2025) to identify genes encoding Cas proteins, spacers and direct repeats of the CRISPR-Cas system. Each genome was analyzed independently, and the results were consolidated in a database using the Excel program (Microsoft^®—Microsoft 365). The results were analyzed and grouped into three categories: Cas protein, spacer, or direct repetitions. RAST assigns gene functions and metabolic pathways by comparing annotated genomes; its results are based on subsystems and protein families that are manually curated within the SEED integration, providing the basis for metabolic reconstructions and gene function assignments [50,51,52].

In parallel, the same 77 Leptospira species were analyzed using the CRISPRCasFinder web server (https://crisprcas.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr, accessed on 15 July 2025) to detect genes related to the CRISPR-Cas system. As with the RAST analysis, each sequence was examined independently, and the results were consolidated using the Excel program (Microsoft^®—Microsoft 365). The results were analyzed and grouped into three categories: Cas protein, spacer, or direct repetitions. CRISPRCasFinder program enables the detection of CRISPR arrays and Cas genes in user-supplied sequence data. This is an updated version of CRISPRFinder with increased specificity and improved accuracy in detecting CRISPR-associated sequences. MacSyFinder is used to identify Cas genes, CRISPR-Cas type, and subtype [53].

Finally, the datasets generated by RAST and CRISPRCasFinder were merged into a single database. Duplicate entries were carefully checked and removed, resulting in a non-redundant dataset for downstream comparative analyses.

2.3. Analysis of the Biological Function of Cas Proteins

Sequences encoded by CRISPR-Cas-associated genes were identified and downloaded using the BLAST algorithm version 1.4.0 (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 15 July 2025) from the NCBI database [54].

Functional annotation was performed with InterProScan bioinformatics program (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/search/sequence/, accessed on 15 July 2025), to identify protein domains, biological processes, molecular function, and cellular components [55]. Additional biological information for each protein was obtained from the Panther GO Terms (https://pantherdb.org/, accessed on 15 July 2025) and GeneCards databases (https://www.genecards.org/, accessed on 15 July 2025). Biological parameters of the proteins were calculated using the ProtParam web server (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 15 July 2025).

The three-dimensional structures of proteins were modeled with SwissModel web server (https://swissmodel.expasy.org, accessed on 15 July 2025) [56], and AlphaFold3 Server (https://alphafoldserver.com/about, accessed on 15 July 2025) [57]. Structural visualization and analysis were carried out with Swiss-pdbViewer version 4.1 (http://spdbv.unil.ch, accessed on 15 July 2025) [58] and PyMOL version 2.6 (https://www.pymol.org/, accessed on 15 July 2025) [59].

2.4. Classification of Cas Proteins into Functional Stages

The CRISPR-Cas proteins detected were manually classified according to the functional stage in which they participate: adaptation (integration of spacers), expression (processing of pre-crRNA), or interference (participation in the effector complex or target cleavage), based on the currently known biological functions of each protein in the CRISPR-Cas system.

2.5. Conservation Patterns of Direct Repeats in the Leptospira Genus

A search for direct repeats was conducted across the 77 species of the Leptospira species. The following direct repeats were found according to the subgroups: P1, 332 sequences; P2, 48 sequences; S1, 26 sequences; and S2, 18 sequences. A database was compiled, and multiple sequence alignment was performed per clade using MEGA version 12 (https://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 15 July 2025) [60]. The alignments were subsequently visualized with SeqLogos web server (http://imed.med.ucm.es/Tools/seqlogo.html, accessed on 15 July 2025) to determine nucleotide frequencies in the spacer sequences [61].

2.6. Bioinformatic Identification of the Immunological Memory (Spacer)

The actinobacteriophage database at phagesDB.org (https://phagesdb.org/, accessed on 15 July 2025) was used to identify the immunological memory of Leptospira species against different bacteriophages [62]. For this analysis, spacer sequences detected in the 77 genomes using RAST (Rapid Annotations using Subsystem Technology) and CRISPRCasFinder web servers were used.

2.7. Identification of Unique Effector Proteins

The genomes of the 77 Leptospira species were scanned using the BLAST algorithm version 1.4.0 (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 15 July 2025) of the NCBI database to detect the Cas9, Cas12, and Cas13 proteins, which are unique effector proteins in CRISPR-Cas systems [54].

2.8. Bioinformatic Detection of Intact Bacteriophages in Genomes

The 77 genomes of the Leptospira species were scanned using the PHASTER program (Phage Search Tool Enhanced Release; https://phaster.ca/, accessed on 15 July 2025) and the PHASTEST web server (Phage Search Tool with Enhanced Sequence Translation; https://phastest.ca/, accessed on 15 July 2025). PHASTER is an upgraded version of the PHAST web server that enables rapid identification and annotation of prophage sequences in bacterial genomes and plasmids. PHASTEST further extends this functionality by providing enhanced sequence translation and visualization capabilities for prophage detection [63,64,65].

3. Results

3.1. Downloading Reference Genomes

In this research, the 77 reference genomes for the Leptospira genus were analyzed and classified into the following subgroups of P1 (21 species), P2 (22 species), S1 (29 species) and S2 (5 species). Based on assembly status, 14 genomes were assembled at the chromosome level, 8 at the scaffold level, and 55 at the contig level. Genome sizes ranged from 3.7 to 4.9 with Leptospira ainazelensis having the largest genome (4.9 Mb) and Leptospira fletcheri and Leptospira fluminis the smallest (3.7 Mb). The genomic GC content ranged from 35% present in Leptospira interrogans to 48% in Leptospira ellisii.

Gene counts ranged from 3409 in Leptospira fletcheri and 4789 in Lepstopira adleri. Similarly, protein counts varied between 3326 and 4626, respectively, in the same species. The number of pseudogenes ranged from 39 in Leptospira ryugenii and Leptospira ellinghausenii to 352 in Leptospira mayottensis (

Table 1. The table summarizes the 77 Leptospira species used in the study, their taxonomic distribution within subgroups (P1, P2, S1, and S2), NCBI Taxonomy accession numbers, genome size (Mb), CG content (%), number of genes, proteins, and non-coding sequences. Color coding indicates subgroup: green for pathogenic P1, blue for pathogenic P2, yellow for saprophytic S1, and red for saprophytic S2.

Species	Subgroup	Access Number	Sequencing Level	Genome Size (Mb)	GC (%)	Genes	Proteins	Non-Coding
L. adleri	P1	GCA_002811985.1	Scaffold	4.8	43.5	4789	4626	163
L. ainazelensis	P1	GCA_016918785.1	Contig	4.9	42.5	4417	4310	107
L. ainlahdjerensis	P1	GCA_016919175.1	Contig	4.8	42.5	4409	4310	99
L. alexanderi	P1	GCA_000243815.3	Contig	4.2	40	4582	4541	41
L. alstonii	P1	GCA_000347175.1	Contig	4.4	42.5	4423	4380	43
L. barantonii	P1	GCA_002811925.1	Contig	4.4	44	4135	4033	102
L. borgpetersenii	P1	GCA_003516145.1	Chromosome	4	40	3792	3463	329
L. ellisii	P1	GCA_002811955.2	Contig	4.3	48	3998	3896	102
L. gomenensis	P1	GCA_004770155.1	Contig	4.3	46	3931	3802	129
L. gorisiae	P1	GCA_040833975.1	Chromosome	4.5	41.5	4104	3939	165
L. interrogans	P1	GCA_002073495.2	Chromosome	4.6	35	4049	3772	277
L. kirschneri	P1	GCA_000243695.3	Contig	4.4	36	4029	3986	43
L. kmetyi	P1	GCA_003722295.1	Chromosome	4.4	45	4160	4035	125
L. mayottensis	P1	GCA_000306675.3	Chromosome	4.2	39.5	3944	3592	352
L. noguchii	P1	GCA_000306255.2	Contig	4.7	35.5	4565	4520	45
L. sanjuanensis	P1	GCA_022267325.1	Contig	4.5	45	4152	4052	100
L. santarosai	P1	GCA_000313175.2	Chromosome	4	42	4191	4080	111
L. stimsonii	P1	GCA_003545875.1	Contig	4.7	42.5	4747	4599	148
L. tipperaryensis	P1	GCA_001729245.1	Chromosome	4.6	42.5	4342	4255	87
L. weilii	P1	GCA_006874765.1	Chromosome	4.4	41	4312	3965	347
L. yasudae	P1	GCA_003545925.1	Contig	4.4	45.5	4286	4162	124
L. andrefontaineae	P2	GCA_004770105.1	Contig	4.3	40	3969	3894	75
L. broomii	P2	GCA_000243715.3	Contig	4.4	43	4249	4205	44
L. dzoumogneensis	P2	GCA_004770895.1	Contig	4.1	41	3814	3724	90
L. fainei	P2	GCA_000306235.2	Contig	4.3	43.5	4157	4113	44
L. fletcheri	P2	GCA_004769195.1	Contig	3.7	47.5	3409	3326	83
L. fluminis	P2	GCA_004771275.1	Contig	3.7	47.5	3427	3342	85
L. haakeii	P2	GCA_002812225.1	Scaffold	4.2	40	3920	3814	106
L. hartskeerlii	P2	GCA_002811475.1	Scaffold	4.1	40.5	3787	3708	79
L. inadai	P2	GCA_000243675.3	Contig	4.5	44.5	4314	4264	50
L. johnsonii	P2	GCA_003112675.1	Contig	4.1	41.5	3754	3713	41
L. koniambonensis	P2	GCA_004769555.1	Contig	4.3	39	4000	3929	71
L. langatensis	P2	GCA_004770615.1	Contig	4.1	45	3751	3671	80
L. licerasiae	P2	GCA_000526875.1	Contig	4.2	41	3899	3834	65
L. neocaledonica	P2	GCA_002812205.1	Scaffold	4.2	40	3978	3889	89
L. perolatii	P2	GCA_002811875.1	Contig	4	42.5	3712	3631	81
L. saintgironsiae	P2	GCA_002811765.1	Contig	4.1	39	3830	3736	94
L. sarikeiensis	P2	GCA_004769615.1	Contig	4.4	40.5	4026	3928	98
L. selangorensis	P2	GCA_004769405.1	Contig	4.2	40	3894	3814	80
L. semungkisensis	P2	GCA_004770055.1	Contig	3.9	43	3626	3562	64
L. venezuelensis	P2	GCA_002150035.1	Contig	4.3	39	4030	3973	57
L. wolffii	P2	GCA_004770635.1	Contig	4.2	46	3851	3771	80
L. cinconiae	P2	GCA_040833995.1	Chromosome	4.1	42	3801	3741	60
L. abararensis	S1	GCA_016918735.1	Contig	4.2	39	3968	3900	68
L. bandrabouensis	S1	GCA_004770555.1	Contig	4.2	37.5	3928	3857	71
L. biflexa	S1	GCA_000017685.1	Chromosome	4	39	3775	3726	49
L. bourretii	S1	GCA_004770145.1	Contig	4.2	38	3923	3840	83
L. bouyouniensis	S1	GCA_004770625.1	Contig	4.1	37	3833	3746	87
L. brenneri	S1	GCA_004769295.1	Contig	3.9	38.5	3662	3593	69
L. chreensis	S1	GCA_016919165.1	Contig	4.5	40	4176	4086	90
L. congkakensis	S1	GCA_004770265.1	Contig	4	38	3712	3647	65
L. ellinghausenii	S1	GCA_003114815.1	Contig	4.2	37.5	3960	3921	39
L. harrisiae	S1	GCA_002811945.1	Scaffold	3.9	38	3726	3651	75
L. jelokensis	S1	GCA_004769775.1	Contig	4.1	39	3833	3755	78
L. kanakyensis	S1	GCA_004769235.1	Contig	4.1	38.5	3884	3810	74
L. kemamanensis	S1	GCA_004769665.1	Contig	3.8	39	3533	3436	97
L. levettii	S1	GCA_002812085.1	Scaffold	3.9	37.5	3655	3579	76
L. meyeri	S1	GCA_004368965.1	Contig	4.2	38	4028	3930	98
L. montravelensis	S1	GCA_004770045.1	Contig	4	37.5	3760	3686	74
L. mtsangambouensis	S1	GCA_004770475.1	Contig	4.1	38	3836	3764	72
L. noumeaensis	S1	GCA_004770765.1	Contig	4.1	38.5	3832	3758	74
L. perdikensis	S1	GCA_004769575.1	Contig	4	38.5	3740	3680	60
L. terpstrae	S1	GCA_000332495.2	Contig	4.1	38	3932	3889	43
L. vanthielii	S1	GCA_004770365.1	Contig	4.1	39	3839	3753	86
L. wolbachii	S1	GCA_000332515.2	Contig	4.1	39	3956	3912	44
L. yanagawae	S1	GCA_004769275.1	Contig	4	38.5	3704	3631	73
L. mgodei	S1	GCA_040833985.1	Chromosome	4	39	3807	3752	55
L. milleri	S1	GCA_040833955.1	Chromosome	3.9	38.5	3628	3555	73
L. iowaensis	S1	GCA_040833965.1	Chromosome	4.1	37	3867	3812	55
L. paudalimensis	S1	GCA_026151345.1	Contig	4.1	37.5	3769	3711	58
L. soteropolitanensis	S1	GCA_026151335.1	Contig	4.1	37.5	3934	3863	71
L. limi	S1	GCA_026151395.1	Contig	3.9	37.5	3679	3619	60
L. idonii	S2	GCA_004770995.1	Contig	4.1	41	3797	3724	73
L. ilyithenensis	S2	GCA_004771005.1	Contig	4.2	40.5	3950	3849	101
L. kobayashii	S2	GCA_003114835.3	Chromosome	4.3	40.5	3945	3902	43
L. ognonensis	S2	GCA_004770745.1	Scaffold	4	39.5	3733	3660	73
L. ryugenii	S2	GCA_003114855.1	Scaffold	4	40	3698	3659	39

).

3.2. Cas Proteins Detection

The main objective of this research was to analyze the reference genomes, detect the proteins belonging to the CRISPR-Cas system and classify them according to their class, type, subtype, genetic variants, and molecular target. The presence of these proteins was detected bioinformatically in 36 out of the 77 species of the Leptospira genus. The number of species containing Cas proteins in the respective subgroups were as follow: 15 in P1; 11 in P2; 7 in S1; and 3 in S2. From the 36 species that have genes encoding Cas proteins, 19 species had multiple Cas proteins, and 17 species only had the Cas3 protein, with only 3 of them having the Cas3 and Cas3a variants. In terms of class distribution, 32 species were classified as Class 1, and 4 species as Class 2 (L. gorisiae, L. fletcheri, L. inadai, and L. ilyithenensis). Notably, L. gorisiae and L. inadai exhibited proteins from both Classes 1 and 2. Across the genus, proteins from CRISPR-Cas types I, II, III, and V were detected. At the subtype level, proteins belonging to subtypes IA, IB, IE, IC, IIB, and U were detected identified. Variants detected included Cas3a, Cas5a, Cas5a2, Cas5b, Cas5c, Cas7b, Cas7c, Cas8c, and Cas8a1a3.

With respect to molecular targets, 35 species encoded proteins that cleave DNA molecules, while only one species (L. haakeii) encoded a protein capable of RNA cleavage (csm2_TypeIIIA). Importantly, this work reports for the first time the presence of CRISPR-Cas system in two saprophytic species (L. ilyithenensis and L. ryugenii), both taxonomically assigned to the S2 subgroup (

Table 2. The table summarizes the 77 Leptospira species analyzed, including their taxonomic subgroup distribution, CRISPR-Cas proteins detected, and their classification into classes, types, subgroups, and variants. The molecular targets cleaved by effector Cas proteins are also indicated. Color coding indicates subgroup: green for pathogenic P1, blue for pathogenic P2, yellow for saprophytic S1, and red for saprophytic S2.

Species	Clade	Proteins	Class	Type	Subtype	Variant	Native Target
L. adleri	P1	cas1_TypeIA, cas4_TypeI-II, cas3_TypeI, cas3a_TypeI, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas5a2_TypeIA, cas6_TypeIA, cas7b_TypeIB	Class 1	I, II, III	IA, IB	cas3a, cas5a2, cas7b	DNA
L. ainazelensis	P1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. ainlahdjerensis	P1	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. alexanderi	P1	cse1_TypeIE, cse2_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas4_TypeI-II, cas5_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1	I, II	IE	-	DNA
L. alstonii	P1	cas1_TypeIA, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas3_TypeI, cas5a2_TypeIA, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeI, cas4_TypeI-II, cas5_TypeIE	Class 1	I, II, III	IA, IE	Cas5a	DNA
L. barantonii	P1	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. borgpetersenii	P1	cse2_TypeIE, cse1_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas5_TypeI, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1	I	IE	-	DNA
L. ellisii	P1	cas3a_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. gomenensis	P1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. kirschneri	P1	cas1_TypeIC, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas3_TypeI, cas4_TypeI-II, cas5_TypeIA, cas5c_TypeIC, cas7c_TypeIC, cas8c_TypeIC	Class 1	I, II, III	IC, IA	Cas5c, cas7c, cas8c	DNA
L. interrogans	P1	cas1_TypeIC, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas3_TypeI, cas3a_TypeI, cas4_TypeI-II, cas5c_TypeIC, cas7c_TypeIC, cas8c_TypeIC	Class 1	I, II, III	IC	Cas3a	DNA
L. kmetyi	P1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. mayottensis	P1	cse1_TypeIE, cse2_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas5_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1	I	IE	-	DNA
L. noguchii	P1	cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas3_TypeI, cas3a_TypeI, cas4_TypeI-II, cas5c_TypeIC, cas7c_TypeIC, cas8c_TypeIC	Class 1	I, II, III	IC	Cas3a, cas5c, cas7c,cas8c	DNA
L. sanjuanensis	P1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. santarosai	P1	cse1_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIA, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas5_TypeIE, cas5a2_TypeIA, cas6_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIA, cas7_TypeIE, cas7_TypeI, cas8a1a3_TypeIA	Class 1	I, II, III	IE, IA	Cas5a2, cas8a1a3	DNA
L. stimsonii	P1	cse1_TypeIE, cse2_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas5_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1	I	IE	-	DNA
L. tipperaryensis	P1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. weilii	P1	cse1_TypeIE, cse2_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas5_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1	I	IE	-	DNA
L. yasudae	P1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. gorisiae	P1	cse1_TypeIE, cpf1_TypeU (Cas12a), cas1_TypeIE, cas1_TypeU, cas2_TypeIE, cas2_Type I-II-III, cas3_TypeI, cas4_TypeU, cas5_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1 Class 2	II, V	IE	-	DNA
L. andrefontaineae	P2	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. broomii	P2	cas1_TypeIA, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas3_TypeI, cas5a2_TypeIA, cas6_TypeIA, cas7_TypeI, cas8a1a3_TypeIA	Class 1	I, II, III	IA	Cas5a2, cas8a1a3	DNA
L. dzoumogneensis	P2	cas3_TypeI, cas3a_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	Cas3a	DNA
L. fainei	P2	cse1_TypeIE, cse2_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas5_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1	I	IE	-	DNA
L. fletcheri	P2	cas1_TypeI-II-III, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas4_TypeI-II, cas9_TypeIIB	Class 2	II	IIB	-	DNA
L. fluminis	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. haakeii	P2	csm2_TypeIIIA, cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I, III	IIIA	-	DNA and RNA
L. hartskeerlii	P2	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. inadai	P2	cas1_TypeIB, cas1_TypeU, cpf1_TypeU (Cas12a), cas1_TypeI-II-III, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas3_TypeI, cas4_TypeI-II, cas4_TypeU, cas4_TypeI-II, cas5b_TypeIB, cas6_TypeI-III, cas7b_TypeIB	Class 1 Class 2	I, II, II, V	IB	Cas5b, cas7b	DNA
L. johnsonii	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. koniambonensis	P2	cse1_TypeIE, cse2_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas5_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1	I	IE	-	DNA
L. langatensis	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. licerasiae	P2	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. neocaledonica	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. perolatii	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. saintgironsiae	P2	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. sarikeiensis	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. selangorensis	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. semungkisensis	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. venezuelensis	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. wolffii	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. cinconiae	P2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. abararensis	S1	cas3_TypeI, cas3a_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	Cas3a	DNA
L. bandrabouensis	S1	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. biflexa	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. bourretii	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. bouyouniensis	S1	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. brenneri	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. chreensis	S1	cas3a_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. congkakensis	S1	cas3a_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. ellinghausenii	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. harrisiae	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. jelokensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. kanakyensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. kemamanensis	S1	cas3_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. levettii	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. meyeri	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. montravelensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. mtsangambouensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. noumeaensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. perdikensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. terpstrae	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. vanthielii	S1	cas3a_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	-	DNA
L. wolbachii	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. yanagawae	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. mgodei	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. milleri	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. iowaensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. paudalimensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. soteropolitanensis	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. limi	S1	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. idonii	S2	cas3_TypeI, cas3a_TypeI	Class 1	I	-	cas3a	DNA
L. ilyithenensis	S2	cas1_TypeU, cas2_TypeI-II-III, cas3_TypeI, cas4_TypeU, cpf1_TypeU(Cas12a)	Class 2	I, II, III, V	-	-	DNA
L. kobayashii	S2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. ognonensis	S2	Not detected	-	-	-	-	-
L. ryugenii	S2	cse1_TypeIE, cse2_TypeIE, cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE, cas3_TypeI, cas5_TypeIE, cas6_TypeIE, cas7_TypeIE	Class 1	I	IE	-	DNA

).

3.3. Analysis of the Biological Function of Cas Proteins

Currently, 13 proteins are described as components of the CRISPR-Cas system (Cas1–Cas13). Analysis of the 77 Leptospira genomes revealed the presence of 10 out of 13 Cas proteins: Cas1, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas5, Cas6, Cas7, Cas8, Cas9, and Cas12. In contrast, Cas10, Cas 11, and Cas13 proteins were not detected in any of the genomes analyzed. Furthermore, Cas1 was found in 18 species, Cas2 in 19, Cas3 in 35, Cas4 in 10, Cas 5 in 17, Ca6 in 14, Cas7 in 17, Cas8 in 5, Cas9 in 1, and Cas12 in 3. Cas3 was the most frequent, present in 35 out of the 36 species encoding Cas proteins, while the least frequent were the unique effector proteins Cas 9 and Cas12.

To study the biological function, biological processes, three-dimensional structure, and identify the functional domains of the CAS proteins, the following proteins and species were used as models: Cas1 (Leptospira interrogans) is a DNA nuclease and participates in the adaptation stage of the CRISPR-Cas system. It helps in the process of spacer integration into the CRISPR matrix. It is associated with biological processes including defense against bacteriophages, plasmids, as well as the maintenance of repetitive elements within the CRISPR array. The protein consists of 254 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 9.51, a molecular weight of 29,817.57 Da, a predicted bacterial half-life exceeding 10 h, and an instability index of 43.37, classifying it as unstable. Structurally, it is composed of 8 β-sheets, 18 α-helices, and contains a Cas1_I-II-II domain that may facilitate the linkage of DNA fragments to the CRISPR array (Figure 1).

Cas2 (Leptospira interrogans) functions as an RNA nuclease involved in the adaptation stage of the CRISPR-Cas system, contributing to spacer integration into the CRISPR array. It is associated with biological processes such as defense against bacteriophages and plasmids, as well as the maintenance of repetitive elements. The protein consists of 90 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 8.49, a molecular weight of 10,317.93 Da, a predicted bacterial half-life exceeding 10 h, and an instability index of 31.57, classifying it as stable. Structurally, Cas2 contains 10 β-sheets and 4 α-helices, and includes a SSF:TTP0101/SSO1404-like domain. Cas2 proteins have been described as either endoribonuclease (acting on ssRNA) or endodeoxyribonuclease (acting on dsDNA), depending on the system in which they occur (Figure 1).

Cas3 (Leptospira interrogans) is a multifunctional protein with nuclease and helicase activity, participating in the interference stage of the CRISPR-Cas system (target cleavage). It is associated with biological processes such as defense against bacteriophages and plasmids, ATP binding, hydrolase activity, and DNA binding. The protein consists of 377 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 8.59, a molecular weight of 43,082.83 Da, and a bioinformatically predicted half-life in bacteria of more than 10 h. Its instability index is 37.43, classifying it as stable. Structurally, Cas3 contains 6 β-sheets and 21 α-helices, and exhibits motifs characteristic of superfamily 2 helicases, including a DEAD/DEAH box region and a conserved C-terminal domain. The Cas3-type HD domain confers nuclease activity against ssDNA and ssRNA (Figure 1).

Cas4 (Leptospira interrogans) is a DNA nuclease that participates in the adaptation stage of the CRISPR-Cas system (spacer integration). It is linked to biological processes such as defense against bacteriophages and plasmids. The protein consists of 142 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 8.95, and a molecular weight of 16,606.38 Da, a predicted bacterial half-life exceeding 10 h, and an instability index of 50.59, classifying it as unstable. Structurally, it contains 6 β-sheets and 6 α-helices. The endonuclease activity of Cas4 proteins contributes to crRNA generation by cleaving sequences complementary to foreign genetic elements, and Cas4 has been characterized as a 5′→3′ single-stranded DNA exonuclease (Figure 1).

Cas5 (Leptospira interrogans) is a protein that participates in the interference stage of the CRISPR-Cas system (effector complex). It is associated with biological processes including defense against bacteriophages and plasmids, maintenance of CRISPR repeat elements, and RNA binding. The protein consists of 234 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 7.72, a molecular weight of 27,128.07 Da, a predicted bacterial half-life exceeding 10 h, and an instability index of 46.99, classifying it as unstable. Structurally, it contains 10 β-sheets and 3 α-helices. Cas5 contributes to the processing or stabilization of pre-crRNA into individual crRNA units, and together with Cas6 is required for optimal crRNA maturation and stability (Figure 1).

Cas6 (Leptospira santarosai) is a protein that participates in the expression stage of the CRISPR-Cas system (pre-crRNA processing). It is associated with processes such as defense against bacteriophages and plasmids. The protein consists of 203 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 9.81, a molecular weight of 22,721.75 Da, a predicted bacterial half-life exceeding 10 h, and an instability index of 25.34, classifying it as stable. Structurally, it contains 16 β-sheets and 5 α-helices. Members of this protein family are found across multiple CRISPR-Cas subtypes. Cas6 proteins share the ability to recognize and cleave a single phosphodiester bond with short-repeated sequence of the pre-crRNA transcript (Figure 1).

Cas7 (Leptospira interrogans) is a protein that participates in the interference stage of the CRISPR-Cas system (effector complex). It is associated with biological processes such as defense against bacteriophages and plasmids, RNA recognition, and crRNA binding. The protein consists of 279 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 6.68, a molecular weight of 31,146.15 Da, a predicted bacterial half-life exceeding 10 h, and an instability index of 38.92, classifying it as stable. Structurally, it contains 18 β-sheets and 6 α-helices. Cas7–11 variants can cleave single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) and self-process pre-crRNA (guide RNA). In other systems, Cas7 (DevR) has also been implicated in fruiting body development, sporulation and aggregation (Figure 1).

Cas8 (Leptospira santarosai) is a protein participates in the interference stage of the CRISPR-Cas system (effector complex). It is associated with biological processes such as defense against bacteriophages, plasmids, functions as the large subunit of the Cascade complex. The protein consists of 532 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 9.51, a molecular weight of 61,404.33 Da, a predicted bacterial half-life exceeding 10 h, and an instability index of 31.72, classifying it as stable. Structurally, it contains 23 β-sheets and 19 α-helices. In Myxococcus xanthus, the Cas8a1 homolog (also known as DevT) stimulates the synthesis of a signal transduction protein required for fruiting body morphogenesis, a process in which rod-shaped cells differentiate into spherical spores under starvation conditions (Figure 1).

Cas9 (Leptospira fletcheri) is a DNA nuclease that participates in the interference stage of the CRISPR-Cas system (target cleavage). It is associated with biological processes such as defense against bacteriophages and plasmids. The protein consists of 1469 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 9.43, a molecular weight of 17,0367.32 Da, a predicted bacterial half-life exceeding 10 h, and an instability index of 43.69, classifying it as unstable. Structurally, it contains 42 β-sheets and 51 α-helices. Cas9 is inactive in the absence of the two guide RNAs (gRNAs). It recognizes a short sequence motif known as the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), which enables discrimination between self of non-self DNA, since CRISPR loci lack PAM sequences. PAM recognition is essential for catalytic activity, and cleavage of target DNA occurs only when Cas9 is bound to its gRNAs (Figure 1).

Cas12 (Leptospira inadai) is a DNA nuclease and participates in the interference stage of the CRISPR-Cas system (target cleavage). It is associated with biological processes such as defense against bacteriophages and plasmids. The protein consists of 1250 amino acids, with an isoelectric point of 9.26, a molecular weight of 148,356.40 Da, a bioinformatically predicted bacterial half-life of more than 2 min, and an instability index of 30.29, classifying it as stable. Structurally, it contains 33 β-sheets and 50 α-helices. The CRISPR-associated protein Cas12a (Cpf1) possesses two distinct nuclease activities: an endoribonuclease activity that processes its own guide RNAs and an RNA-guided DNase activity that cleaves target DNA. Cas12a, an RNA-guided endonuclease of the type V CRISPR-Cas system adopts a bilobed architecture composed of an α-helical recognition (REC) lobe and a nuclease (NUC) lobe. The crRNA-target DNA heteroduplex binds within the positively charged central channel between the two lobes (Figure 1).

3.4. Classification of Cas Proteins into Functional Stages

The CRISPR-Cas system degrades foreign genetic material from viruses through three functional stages: adaptation (adapter integration), expression (pre-crRNA processing), and interference (effector complex formation and target cleavage). Among the 36 species with genes encoding Cas proteins, 19 encoded multiple Cas proteins, whereas 17 encoded only Cas3 protein. The latter group likely represents species with a partial or incomplete CRISPR-Cas system.Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to establish the distribution of Cas proteins across the three functional stages of the CRISPR-Cas system in the 19 Leptospira species that encode multiple proteins, and to identify species with a complete system. Fifteen species carried Class 1, Type I CRISPR-Cas system, one species (L. fletcheri) had a Class 2, Type II system, and one species (L. ilyithenensis) had a Class 2, Type V system. Two species, L. gorisiae and L. inadai, encoded a combination of Class 1, Type I and Class 2, Type V systems.

Notably, L. kirschneri, L. interrogans, and L. noguchii lacked Cas6, which is normally required for the expression process (pre-crRNA processing), although Cas5 may compensate for this function. The absence of Cas1 in L. borgpetersenii, and Cas8 in L. adleri, L. alstonii, and L. inadai, was also unexpected. Additionally, the presence of csm2, a protein of the class 1—Type IIIA system in L. haakeii, is striking (

Table 3. Distribution of Cas proteins across the three functional stages of the CRISPR-Cas system in the 19 Leptospira species encoding multiple proteins: Adaptation (adapter integration), Expression (pre-crRNA processing), and Interference (effector complex formation or target cleavage). Color coding indicates subgroup: green for pathogenic P1, blue for pathogenic P2, and red for saprophytic S2.

Species	Adaptation Spacer Integration	Expression Pre-crRNA Processing	Interference		Taxonomic Classification
			Effector Complex	Target Cleavage
L. adleri	Cas1_TypeIA, Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas4_TypeI-II	Cas6_TypeIA	Cas5a2_TypeIA, Cas7b_TypeIB	Cas3_TypeI, Cas3a_TypeI	Class 1 type IF2
L. alexanderi	Cas1_TypeIE, Cas2_TypeIE, Cas4_TypeI-II	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE, Cse2_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE
L. alstonii	Cas1_TypeIA, Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas4_TypeI-II	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5a2_TypeIA, Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeI	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1 type IF2
L. borgpetersenii	Cas2_TypeIE	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeI, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE
L. gorisiae	Cas1_TypeU, Cas1_TypeIE, Cas2_Type_I-II-III, Cas2_TypeIE, Cas4_TypeU	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE	Cas12a Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE Class 2 type V
L. interrogans	Cas1_TypeIC, Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas4_TypeI-II		Cas5c_TypeIC, Cas7c_TypeIC, Cas8c_TypeIC	Cas3_TypeI, Cas3a_TypeI	Class 1 type IC
L. kirschneri	Cas1_TypeIC, Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas4_TypeI-II		Cas5_TypeIA, Cas5c_TypeIC, Cas7c_TypeIC, Cas8c_TypeIC	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1 type IC
L. mayottensis	Cas1_TypeIE, Cas2_TypeIE	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE, Cse2_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE
L. noguchii	Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas4_TypeI-II		Cas5c_TypeIC, Cas7c_TypeIC, Cas8c_TypeIC	Cas3_TypeI, Cas3a_TypeI	Class 1 type IC
L. santarosai	Cas1_TypeIA, Cas1_TypeIE, Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas2_TypeIE	Cas6_TypeIA, Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas5a2_TypeIA, Cas7_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeI, Cas8a1a3_TypeIA, Cse1_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1 type B
L. stimsonii	Cas1_TypeIE, Cas2_TypeIE	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE, Cse2_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE
L. weilii	Cas1_TypeIE, Cas2_TypeIE	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE, Cse2_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE
L. broomii	Cas1_TypeIA, Cas2_TypeI-II-III	Cas6_TypeIA	Cas5a2_TypeIA, Cas7_TypeI, Cas8a1a3_TypeIA	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1 type B
L. fainei	Cas1_TypeIE, cas2_TypeIE	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE, Cse2_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE
L. fletcheri	Cas1_TypeI-II-III, Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas4_TypeI-II	RNAse III		Cas9_TypeIIB	Class 2 type IIB
L. inadai	Cas1_TypeIB, Cas1_TypeU, Cas1_TypeI-II-III, Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas4_TypeI-II, Cas44_TypeU, Cas4_TypeI-II	Cas6_TypeI-III	Cas5b_TypeIB, Cas7b_TypeIB	Cas3_TypeI, Cas12a	Class 1 type IF2 Class 2 type V
L. koniambonensis	Cas1_TypeIE, Cas2_TypeIE	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE, Cse2_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE
L. ilyithenensis	Cas1_TypeU, Cas2_TypeI-II-III, Cas4_TypeU			Cas3_TypeI, Cas12a	Class 2 type V
L. ryugenii	Cas1_TypeIE, Cas2_TypeIE	Cas6_TypeIE	Cas5_TypeIE, Cas7_TypeIE, Cse1_TypeIE, Cse2_TypeIE	Cas3_TypeI	Class 1, type IE

).

3.5. Conservation Patterns of the Direct Repeats in the Leptospira Genus

A search for direct repeats was performed across the 77 species, identifying 434 spacer sequences distributed among the four species subgroups. Spacer length ranged from 23 to 39 nucleotides. Alignment of these sequences and analysis of nucleotide frequency reveled subgroup-specific conservation patterns: in P1, a central conserved motif (GTTTGAACTCCCACAAGTT), in P2 a central motif (CTGATCCCCACACACGTGGGGATTAA), in S1 a central motif (CCAGATCTGCAAGTGGATCTGC), and in S2, conservation was observed across the entire sequence (CTCACCACGCATATGGGGTTCAACCAT). Furthermore, when the 434 sequences from all four subgroups were compared collectively, no conservation pattern was detected (Figure 2).

3.6. Bioinformatic Identification of the Immunological Memory (Spacer Sequences)

This analysis is performed on the 19 species with the presence of spacer sequences, to verify the functionality of the different CRISPR-Cas systems detected. The presence of spacer sequences within the CRISPR arrays (Leader Sequence—Direct Repeats—Spacer Sequences) is clear evidence of the functionality of the different systems, because the bacteria incorporate spacer sequences as a kind of immunological memory against bacteriophages or plasmids. Among the 19 Leptospira species with Cas proteins, all presented spacer sequences and direct repeats. Among the 19 species with a complete and functional CRISPR-Cas system (presence of Cas proteins, spacer sequences, and direct repeats), a range of (12–58) spacers per species was detected. Leptospira noguchii with 58 spacer sequences was the species with the widest repertoire of immunological memory against bacteriophages, while Leptospira kirschneri with 12 spacer sequences was the species with the lowest immunological memory. A total of 617 spacer sequences were detected among the 19 Leptospira species, but only 323 were identified as belonging to different bacteriophages in the database (The actinobacteriophage database). Forty-two spacer sequences could not be identified, representing bacteriophages not reported in the database. These spacer sequences that represent the different bacteriophages have been found in the genome of 12 bacterial genera (Gordonia, Arthrobacter, Streptomyces, Rhodococcus, Propionibacterium, Microbacterium, Mycobacterium, Curtobacterium, Brevibacterium, Corynebacterium, and Tsukamurella). It should be noted that these 12 bacterial genera are represented by multiple spacer sequences that were found in various Leptospira species (Table S1).

3.7. Identification of Unique Effector Proteins

Given the difficulty of establishing gene-editing systems with CRISPR-Cas complexes composed of multiple effector proteins, a search was conducted for single-protein effectors such as Cas9, Cas12, and Cas13. One species (L. fletcheri) encoded Cas9, a protein Class 2, Type II, while three species (L. ilyithenensis, L. gorisiae, and L. inadai) encoded Cas12, a protein Class 2, Type V. No species were found with Cas13. Cas9 and Cas12 were structurally modeled, and functional domain analyses were performed to better understand the structure and function of these endogenous proteins, which could potentially be used as gene-editing tools in Leptospira (Figure 1). When comparing the Cas9 and Cas12a proteins of the Leptospira genus with homologs from model organisms commonly used in CRISPR–Cas studies (Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 and Francisella novicida Cas12a), we found that both proteins show strong similarity to those identified in other Leptospira species. Moreover, they exhibit high sequence identity, genetic relatedness, and coverage with members of phylogenetically related genera such as Turnerella and Leptonema. Notably, the Leptospira fletcheri Cas9 protein differs from S. pyogenes Cas9 in amino acid sequence, functional domain composition, and predicted tertiary structure. In contrast, the Leptospira inadai Cas12a protein displays nearly identical sequence, domain architecture, and structural configuration to that of F. novicida, a well-established model species for CRISPR–Cas research (Supplementary Material S2).

3.8. Bioinformatic Detection of Intact Bacteriophages in Genomes

Bioinformatic detection of bacteriophages was performed across the genomes of 77 Leptospira species. Three intact bacteriophages were identified in four Leptospira species (L. mayottensis, L. weilii, L. bandrabouensis, and L. ellinghausenii), while two questionable or nearly complete bacteriophages were detected in L. weilii and L. fluminis. In addition, 58 species contained incomplete bacteriophages, and 13 showed no evidence of bacteriophage sequences (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

The Leptospira genus has made great progress in recent years, with 77 species de-scribed and 1157 genomes sequenced (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/?taxon=171, accessed on 5 August 2025). Each species has a reference genome and multiple genomes from different strains. These genomes are a valuable source of genetic information for computational biology studies, where different bacterial biological processes can be explored. The major problem with the Leptospira genomes, and many prokaryotes, is that a large portion of the proteins encoded in their genomes are hypothetical (predicted by an ORF, but without experimental validation), thus rendering their functions unknown. For example, in the species L. interrogans serovar Lai, only 11.5% of the proteins have been characterized [66,67]. According to the functional annotation of the proteins in the 77 genomes of the Leptospira genus, we found a range of hypothetical proteins between (41.4–57.9%), being the species with the most hypothetical proteins L. ainlahdjerensis (57.9%) and the species with the least hypothetical proteins L. Harrisiae (41.4%). This result reflects a large gap in the understanding of biological functions of proteins in the Leptospira genus and the urgent need for a gene editing tool (Figure 4).

Moreover, the gene editing process in the Leptospira genus has been difficult to standardize, which has hampered the functional analysis of thousands of proteins and their assignment to the bacteria’s biological processes [13]. However, the CRISPR-Cas methodology is emerging as a promising tool for gene silencing in Leptospira, yielding knockout mutants of multiple proteins [13,45,46]. Therefore, it is important to explore endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems in the 77 currently described species to uncover their diversity, characterize their molecular components (Cas proteins, direct repeats, and spacers), assess their immunological memory, and identify intact bacteriophages that have evaded the immune system. Regarding genome availability, a reference genome was obtained for each of the 77 Leptospira species, providing a comprehensive overview of Cas protein distribution in the genus (Table 1). Similar work has identified CRISPR-Cas systems in 18 Leptospira species, with the objective of assessing the taxonomic utility of CRISPR-Cas arrays for distinguishing species and serovars of the genus [47].

A total number of 166 Cas proteins were detected in 36 from the 77 (46.75%) Leptospira species, corresponding to Cas1 to Cas9, and Cas12. The proteins were classified into class 1 and class 2 systems, and types I, II, and V. Additionally, proteins belonging to the subtypes IA, IB, IC, IE, IIB, and IIIA, and variants Cas3a, Cas5a, Cas5a2, Cas5b, Cas5c, Cas7b, Cas7c, Cas8a1a3, and Cas8c were also detected. All proteins target DNA for cleavage, except for the csm2_TypeIIIA protein in L. haakeii, which also targets RNA molecules. The Csm complex comprises five Cas proteins (Csm1-Csm5) and a crRNA, which degrades invading DNA and RNA [68].

Currently, there are 43 pathogenic species divided into P1 (21 species) and P2 (22 species) subgroups, from which 27 species encoded Cas proteins; therefore, concluding that not all pathogenic species have CRISPR-Cas systems. Moreover, there are 34 saprophytic species grouped into S1 (29 species) and S2 (5) subgroups, with only two species (L. ilyithenensis, and L. ryugenii) having complete CRISPR-Cas systems and the Cas3a, type I protein present in ten species. Based on these findings, we can conclude that some saprophytic species encode CRISPR-Cas systems, contrary to what was reported in a previous study, that did not include these species [47]. Having found such systems potentially allows for experimental trials without the risk of infection in research laboratories. It is striking to find the cas3a, typeI protein as the sole representative of the CRISPR-Cas system in 17 Leptospira species (9 pathogens and 8 saprophytes). This suggests that these species have lost their CRISPR–Cas systems, and this vestigial protein has been conserved in their genomes to perform different functions in other biological processes; beyond defense against viruses (CRISPR immunity), the Cas3 protein may be involved in regulating biofilm formation and virulence in bacteria [69], as well as influencing genes related to quorum sensing (a form of bacterial communication where cells release and detect signal molecules called autoinducers, allowing them to sense the population density of their community and coordinate gene expression to alter collective behavior) [70], secretion systems [71], and flagella formation [69]. These non-canonical functions of Cas3 are being investigated and may have implications for gene editing and other cellular biological processes.

According to the results obtained, the Leptospira genus has a wide diversity of Cas proteins in 36 species that could be used as genetic editing tools.

Thus far, 13 types of Cas proteins have been described. Analysis of Leptospira genomes, revealed 10 of these proteins 13 (76.92%), indicating that the genus possesses a broad repertoire of Cas components. Eight belong to multi-protein effector systems (Cas1-Cas8), while two correspond to single-protein effectors (Cas9 and Cas12a). Notably, this study reports for the first time the presence of endogenous Cas9 and Cas12a in the Leptospira genus.

Previous studies have reported gene silencing in Leptospira species using Cas9, but the proteins employed were heterologous, genetically modified nucleases designed to introduce a single cut in the target DNA [46].

A functional bioinformatics analysis for the ten types of Cas proteins detected (Cas1-Cas9, and Cas12a) was performed to characterize their physicochemical properties, biological functions, associated biological processes, three-dimensional structures, and functional domains. This analysis enabled us to assess their roles within the CRISPR-Cas system and to assign each protein to one of the three functional stages: adaptation, expression, or interference. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the functionality of Cas proteins in Leptospira genus corresponds to other bacterial species (Figure 1).

Another important step in characterizing the CRISPR-Cas system is the classification of proteins into functional stages according to their biological roles. The first stage, adaptation, involves recognition of foreign DNA and RNA, cleavage of the viral genome, and integration of genome fragments into the bacterial chromosome as spacer sequences. This stage typically includes Cas1, Cas2, and Cas4, although Cas4 may be absent in most systems and entirely lacking in types III, V, and VI [22]. Among the 19 Leptospira species encoding Cas proteins, ten contained Cas1, Cas2, and Cas4; 8 contained Cas1 and Cas2; and 1 contained only Cas2. According to our results, the adaptation stage is complete in all 19 species. Although L. borgpetersenii lacks Cas2, its system appears to be functional, as spacer sequences were identified originating from bacteriophages.

The functional stage of expression consists of the transcription of the CRISPR microarray locus into immature RNA precursors (pre-crRNA) and their subsequent processing into mature RNA (cr-RNA) [22]. In this state, Cas6 or Cas5 are key components in Class 1, type I system, whereas RNAse III fulfills this role in Class 2, type II system. Additionally, Class 2, types V and VI systems, the unique effector proteins Cas12 and Cas13 also participate in pre-crRNA processing [22]. According to our results, all 19 Leptospira species analyzed possess the proteins necessary for a fully functional expression stage. (Table 3).

The interference stage consists of binding mature RNAs (crRNA) to multiprotein effector complexes or single effector proteins, which recognize an identical or similar sequence in the genome of invading viruses or plasmids and cleave them to inactivate them [33,34]. In Class 1 type I systems, Cas5, Cas7, and Cas8 are important to form the effector complex, along with Cas3 protein, which is responsible for targeting and cleaving DNA, whereas in Class 2 type II, V, and VI systems, Cas9, Cas12, and Cas13 are essential to form the effector complex. According to our results, all species have their respective complete effector complexes (Table 3).

Once we verified that the adaptation, expression, and interference stages were complete, we proceeded to assign the classes, types, and subtypes according to the taxonomic classification of CRISPR-Cas systems proposed by Makarova et al. in 2020 [36]. In our study, we found seventeen species classified as Class 1 type I; one species as Class 2 type II; and three species as class 2 type V. The following CRISPR-Cas subtypes were identified: IB (L. santarosai, and L. broomii), IC (L. kirschneri, L. interrogans, and L. noguchii), IE (L. alexanderi, L. borgpetersenii, L. mayottensis, L. stimsonii, L. weilii, L. gorisiae, L. fainei, L. koniambonensis, and L. ryugenii), IIB (L. fletcheri), VA (L. gorisiae, L. inadai, and L. ilyithenensis), IF2 (L. adleri, L. alstonii, and L. inadai). It is worth highlighting that the species L. inadai (Class 1 type IF2, and Class 2 type V) and L. gorisiae (Class 1, type IE, and Class 2 type V) each contain two distinct CRISPR-Cas systems (Table 3). To date, only subtypes IB, and IC have been described in the Leptospira genus [37,38,39]. This study therefore provides the first report of subtypes IE, IIB, VA, and IF2 in Leptospira. These findings significantly contribute to our understanding of the diversity and functionality of CRISPR–Cas systems in the Leptospira genus. Bacterial species can harbor and activate multiple types of CRISPR–Cas systems, allowing them to defend against a wider range of viral and genetic threats. The presence of multiple systems reflects an evolutionary war with phages, which in turn have developed inhibitors such as anti-CRISPR proteins to evade detection [72]. In addition, an additional system can act as a backup in case the primary CRISPR–Cas system fails, ensuring the continuity of bacterial defense. The presence of multiple CRISPR–Cas systems in a single bacterial species is a known phenomenon: some Streptococcus species can harbor up to three different types of CRISPR–Cas systems [73]. Clostridium and Bacillus genera have multiple types of CRISPR–Cas systems in different strains, such as types IB, II-B, II-C, and III-B in Clostridium [74], and types IB and IC in Bacillus [75].

Another fundamental component of the CRISPR-Cas system is the direct repeats (DR), which serve to separate the spacer sequences (segments of DNA from viruses). These nucleotide sequences are identical in size and sequence. Direct repeats can be similar between related species, but also very different between distant species. The average spacer size is 32 nucleotides, but they can vary between 21 and 47 base pairs [22]. Analysis of the 77 genomes uncovered 434 unique direct repeats, with sizes ranging between 23 and 55 base pairs. Conservation patterns were observed within the species subgroups (P1, P2, S1, and S2), but no conserved pattern was found among the 77 species. This is consistent with the literature, where genetically closely related species retain similar direct repeats, while genetically distant species use completely different direct repeats in their CRISPR-Cas arrays [22] (Figure 2).

Spacers are nucleotide sequences of fixed length but high variability, as they originate from diverse bacteriophages and plasmids. Sizes range from 20 to 72 base pairs [22]. A total of 617 spacer sequences were identified, representing the bacterial immunological memory against bacteriophage infection. Of these, 404 sequences matched entries in the Actinobacteriophage database and corresponded to 323 unique becteriophages. The remaining 81 sequences could not be identified, reflecting the presence of many bacteriophages yet to be reported in the database. The identified bacteriophages were associated with 11 different bacterial genera (Table S1). These findings confirm the presence and functionality of CRISPR-Cas systems in 19 Leptospira species. Structurally, genes encoding Cas proteins, direct repeats, and spacer sequences were detected. Functionally, spacers corresponded to bacteriophages sequences, indicating that Leptospira species had been exposed to these bacteriophages, avoided infection, and generated an immunological memory against them. However, the bioinformatics analysis of CRISPR–Cas systems in the Leptospira genus is a preliminary result that demonstrates the existence of the components, but it is necessary to experimentally validate these results to ensure that the systems work correctly. For example, this could involve performing experimental evaluations of the degradation of a bacteriophage or blocking a gene in a Leptospira species that has the complete CRISPR–Cas system. These findings have significant implications for potential applications in bacteriophage therapy, where the CRISPR–Cas system could be harnessed to develop targeted treatments for bacterial infections.

An interesting result was the partial or total loss of the CRISPR–Cas system in 58 species of the Leptospira genus. This raises the following question: why are some Leptospira species losing this defense system? Regarding this phenomenon, it is known that some bacterial species lack CRISPR–Cas systems due to evolutionary inactivation. CRISPR–Cas systems can be selectively inactivated in certain bacteria, as observed in the Bacillus cereus group [76], allowing them to adapt to specific environments. Another cause of CRISPR–Cas system loss is selective pressure induced by antibiotic exposure. Intensive antibiotic use can lead to the loss of the CRISPR–Cas system, as it can act as a barrier to the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes [77]. Additionally, total or partial loss of essential components of the CRISPR–Cas system can render the system inoperable. For these reasons, we assume that some species of the Leptospira genus have lost their CRISPR–Cas defense system.

CRISPR-Cas systems can cleave sequences from bacteriophages or plasmids using multi-protein complexes (Class 1-types I, III, and IV) or single effector proteins (Class 2-types II, V, and VI). Single effector systems are particularly attractive for gene editing due to their simplicity, which facilitates application across multiple bacterial species [22]. According to our results, three species encode single-protein effector: L. fletcheri with a Class 2, type II system (Cas9 as cleavage protein), and L. inadai and L. ilyithenensis with Class 2, type V systems (Cas12a, as cleavage protein). This finding is significant for the Leptospira genus, as it represents the first report of endogenous Cas9 and Cas12a effectors. These proteins could serve as tools to optimize future gene-editing approaches while avoiding the toxicity associated with exogenous proteins from other bacterial species.

Finally, CRISPR-Cas systems are not infallible. Therefore, it is important to identify bacteriophages that have successfully evaded the CRISPR-Cas defense system, leaving their intact sequences embedded into the bacterial genome. Detecting such prophages is crucial not only for understanding the evolutionary dynamics between bacteria and their viruses but also for developing novel biotechnological applications. Bacteriophages have gained attention as alternative tools for gene editing [78,79,80] and as promising candidates for antibacterial therapy against multidrug-resistant infections in humans and animals [81,82,83,84,85].

Based on our analysis, we detected the following bacteriophages infecting four Leptospira species: L. mayottensis (PHAGE_Pseudo_phi3_NC_030940), L. weilii (PHAGE_Paenib_Tripp_NC_028930), L. bandrabouensis and L. ellinghausenii (PHAGE_Leptos_LE1_NC_048892). The only phages that have been isolated, purified, and phenotypically characterized in the Leptospira genus are LE1, LE3, and LE4. These bacteriophages were described infecting the saprophytic species Leptospira biflexa in the 1990s [86], and the LE1 genome was subsequently sequenced [87], and in 2018, sequencing and proteomic analyses of LE3 and LE4 were reported [88]. Despite these advances, research on Leptospira bacteriophages remains limited.

In this study, two additional bacteriophages infecting Leptospira were identified (PHAGE_Pseudo_phi3_NC_030940, and PHAGE_Paenib_Tripp_NC_028930). These findings expand current knowledge of phage diversity in this genus and may prove valuable for future applications in Leptospira genome engineering and the development of next-generation bacteriophage-based antibacterial therapies.

5. Conclusions

The presence of Cas proteins, direct repeats, and spacer sequences homologous to bacteriophage genomes indicates a functional CRISPR-Cas system in 19 Leptospira species. Notably, the detection of endogenous Cas9 and Cas12a proteins, both unique effectors, highlight their potential as precise tools for gene editing in this genus. The identification of saprophytic species with complete and functional CRISPR-Cas systems suggests a recent acquisition of this system in subgroup S2 and provides non-pathogenic models that may be valuable for experimental studies under laboratory conditions. Additionally, the three intact bacteriophages detected in four Leptospira species represent promising candidates both for genetic manipulation of the bacteria, due to their ability to evade the CRISPR-Cas system, and for the development of phage-based therapeutics aimed at selectively lysing Leptospira during human and animal infections.