Next Article in Journal
Spotted Fever Rickettsioses in Panama: New Cases and the Gaps That Hinder Its Epidemiological Understanding
Previous Article in Journal
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Infections in Animals: A Comprehensive Review of Species Distribution and Laboratory Diagnostic Methods
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/pathogens14101005
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Bovine Leukemia Virus in Argentine, Bolivian, Paraguayan and Cuban Native Cattle Using a Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay-BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2

by
Guillermo Giovambattista
1,2,*,†,
Aronggaowa Bao
2,†,
Olivia Marcuzzi
1,
Ariel Loza Vega
3,
Juan Antonio Pereira Rico
3,
Maria Florencia Ortega Masague
4,
Liz Aurora Castro Rojas
5,
Ruben Dario Martinez
6,
Odalys Uffo Reinosa
7 and
Yoko Aida
2,*
1
Instituto de Genética Veterinaria “Ingeniero Fernando N. Dulout” (UNLP-CONICET LA PLATA), Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, UNLP, Av. 60 y 118 S/N, La Plata 1900, Argentina
2
Laboratory of Global Infectious Diseases Control Science, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
3
Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma Gabriel René Moreno, Santa Cruz de la Sierra 00591, Bolivia
4
Agencia de Extensión Rural (AER Lules-EEA Famaillá), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Ruta Provincial 301 km 32, Tucumán 4132, Argentina
5
Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Acceso Avda. Mcal. Lopez a Campus UNA, San Lorenzo 111421, Paraguay
6
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Av. Juan XXIII y Ruta Provincial Nº 4, Lomas de Zamora 1832, Argentina
7
Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria (CENSA), Carretera de Jamaica y Autopista Nacional, San José de las Lajas, La Habana 32700, Cuba
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2025, 14(10), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14101005
Submission received: 19 August 2025 / Revised: 22 September 2025 / Accepted: 30 September 2025 / Published: 4 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next-Gen Sequencing Advances Pathogen Research in Health, Agriculture & Environment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV), an oncogenic retrovirus of the genus Deltaretrovirus, causes enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL), the most prevalent neoplastic disease in cattle and a major source of economic loss. While BLV prevalence has been studied in commercial breeds, data on native Latin American cattle remain limited. This study assessed BLV infection and proviral load in 244 animals from six native breeds: Argentine Creole (CrAr), Patagonian Argentine Creole (CrArPat), Pampa Chaqueño Creole (CrPaCh), Bolivian Creole from Cochabamba (CrCoch), Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa), and Siboney (Sib), sampled across Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Cuba. BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay detected BLV provirus in 76 animals (31.1%), with a mean load of 9923 copies per 105 cells (range: 1–79,740). Infection rates varied significantly by breed (9.8% in CrAr to 83.8% in CrPaCh) and country (15.6% in Argentina to 83.8% in Paraguay) (p = 9.999 × 10−5). Among positives, 57.9% exhibited low proviral load (≤1000 copies), and 13.2% showed moderate levels (1001–9999), suggesting potential resistance to EBL progression. This is the first comprehensive report of BLV proviral load in Creole cattle across Latin America, offering novel epidemiological insights and highlighting the importance of native breeds in BLV surveillance.

1. Introduction

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV), a tumorigenic retrovirus belonging to the genus Deltaretrovirus, is the etiological agent of enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL), one of the most prevalent neoplastic diseases affecting cattle. Upon infection, BLV integrates into the host genome and may remain clinically asymptomatic in a condition referred to as the aleukemic state. Alternatively, it can progress to persistent lymphocytosis, a hematological disorder characterized by an elevated population of B lymphocytes, which may ultimately develop into B-cell lymphomas across various lymphoid tissues in infected animals [1,2]. Moreover, BLV-induced malignant cells are capable of infiltrating multiple organ systems, including the abomasum, heart, intestine, kidney, lungs, liver, and uterus. Clinical manifestations of BLV-associated tumors predominantly include gastrointestinal dysfunction, loss of appetite, weight loss, generalized weakness, lymphadenopathy, decreased milk yield, and reproductive inefficiency, each contributing to considerable economic losses within the livestock industry [3,4,5,6,7,8].
EBL was first documented in 1871 in Germany [9]. The virus initially emerged in the Memmel region of East Prussia, now Klaipėda, Lithuania, and subsequently disseminated across all continents, primarily via the international trade of breeding livestock. The prevalence of BLV infection exhibits considerable variability both among and within countries. Due to the implementation of successful eradication programs [10,11], most Western European nations, along with Australia and New Zealand, are either entirely free of BLV or maintain restricted zones of infection. In contrast, elevated BLV prevalence rates have been reported in both dairy and beef cattle populations across many countries outside these regions [12,13,14,15]. In Latin America, EBL was first recognized in Brazil in 1943 [16]. Estimates of BLV prevalence in Zebu, Taurine pure breeds, and crossbred cattle across Latin American countries range from below 20% to over 80% at the national survey, and from 0% to nearly 100% across specific breeds [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
In Latin America, the dairy and beef cattle industries are well developed and contribute substantially to regional economies. The continent’s diverse agroecological zones support the breeding of various cattle types for dairy, beef, or dual-purpose production systems.
These include Zebuine breeds (e.g., Nellore, Brahman, Gir, Guzerat), Taurine breeds (e.g., Angus, Hereford, Holstein, Jersey), and composite breeds (e.g., Brangus, Braford, Girolando). Within the Taurine group, Creole breeds hold particular historical and genetic significance. These cattle are direct descendants of animals introduced by Spanish and Portuguese colonists during the late 15th and early 16th centuries. Following over 500 years of natural selection, Creole cattle have evolved into resilient populations exhibiting adaptation to local environmental conditions, extensive phenotypic variation (notably in coat coloration), elevated longevity and fertility, and notable resistance to endemic subtropical diseases. This includes reduced susceptibility to the tick Boophilus microplus, a prevalent vector of multiple bovine pathogens [27,28].
A range of diagnostic techniques has been developed and implemented for BLV, including serological assays targeting anti-BLV antibodies (such as agar gel immunodiffusion [AGID], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], phytohemagglutinin [PHA], and radioimmunoassay [RIA]), as well as nucleic acid-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of the proviral genome (e.g., standard PCR, nested-PCR, quantitative real time PCR [qPCR], and direct blood-based PCR) [13,14,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Notably, the BLV provirus remains integrated into host cellular genomes even in the absence of detectable antibodies. Moreover, proviral load (PVL), which is the number of copies of a provirus, has been associated with BLV-associated disease progression [35,36,37] and transmission potential [35,38,39,40,41]. Accordingly, quantitative real-time PCR is recommended for accurate epidemiological assessments.
To date, ten BLV genotypes have been identified, initially through restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-PCR analysis and subsequently via partial or complete genomic sequencing [2,23,42,43], seven of which have been detected in Latin America [2]. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of BLV in Creole cattle from Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay, as well as a composite local breed from Cuba. To our knowledge, BLV PVL has previously been assessed using the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay only in Bolivian Yacumeño Creole cattle, the Hartón del Valle Creole, and the Lucerna composite breed [23,44,45].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, DNA Extraction, and Plasma Isolation

Blood samples were collected from 244 adult cattle representing six distinct local breeds/populations: Argentine Creole (CrAr), Patagonian Argentine Creole (CrArPat), Pampa Chaqueño Creole from Paraguay (CrPaCh), Bolivian Creole from the Cochabamba Department (CrCoch), Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa), and the composite breed Siboney from Cuba (Sib), as detailed in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1. Genomic DNA was extracted using either the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) or the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturers’ protocols.

2.2. Detection of BLV Proviral Load Using BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2

BLV PVLs were determined using a BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay (Nippon Gene Co., Ltd., Toyama, Japan), developed based on the “Coordination of Common Motifs” (CoCoMo) algorithm [18,30] using a THUNDERBIRD Probe qPCR Mix (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan). Briefly, a 183 bp region within the long terminal repeat (LTR) of the BLV genome was amplified using degenerate primers and a FAM-labeled minor groove binder (MGB) TaqMan probe in conjunction with the THUNDERBIRD qPCR Mix (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan) [35,46]. Simultaneously, a 151 bp fragment of the single-copy bovine leukocyte antigen (BoLA)-DRA gene was amplified using a specific primer pair and a FAM-labeled MGB probe, serving as a normalization control for viral genomic DNA quantification [35,46]. Appropriate positive and negative controls were included throughout the assay. The number of proviral copies per 100,000 cells was calculated following the formula established by Jimba et al. [35].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

BLV prevalence among the tested cattle was assessed through the direct enumeration of positive and negative cases. Absolute frequencies and categories of BLV proviral load were statistically compared across breeds and countries using Fisher’s exact test based on 10,000 replicates, as implemented in the R statistical environment (https://www.r-project.org/, accessed on 1 August 2020).

2.4. Ethical Approval

All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Committee on Care and Use of Experimental Animals (CICUAL) from the School of Veterinary Sciences of the National University of La Plata (Buenos Aires, Argentina; protocols 89-1-18T, 41.2.14T).

3. Results

3.1. BLV Prevalence of Among Latin American Cattle Breeds

A total of 244 blood samples representing six Latin American cattle breeds were screened for BLV infection using the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay. All DNA samples successfully amplified the BoLA-DRA gene, which served as an internal control to verify host DNA integrity and to standardize PVL quantification across samples. BLV provirus was detected in 76 samples, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 31.1% (Table 2 and Table 3), with a mean PVL of 9923 copies per 105 cells (range: 1 to 79,740 copies).
The proportion of BLV-positive animals varied significantly across breeds, ranging from 9.8% in CrAr to 83.8% in CrPaCh (p_among breeds = 9.999 × 10−5; Table 2). Fisher’s exact test revealed statistically significant differences in BLV prevalence between CrAr and CrArPat (p = 0.003), CrSaa (p = 0.001), and CrPaCh (p = 1.14 × 10−8), as well as between CrPaCh and Siboney (p = 0.006).
At the country level, BLV prevalence ranged from 15.6% in Argentina to 83.8% in Paraguay (p_among countries = 9.999 × 10−5; Table 3). Significant differences were observed between Argentina and Bolivia (p = 0.035), Argentina and Paraguay (p = 6.04 × 10−7), and between Paraguay and Cuba (p = 0.006).

3.2. BLV PVL Among Latin American Native Cattle Breeds

PVL is a critical factor influencing both the progression of BLV-associated disease [35,36,37] and the virus’s transmission potential [35,38,39,40,41]. First, PVL was quantified using the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay and summarized PVL in all BLV positive cattle for each sampled breed and country in Latin America (Table 4 and Table 5). Among BLV-positive individuals, a substantial proportion exhibited low PVL levels: 57.9% (44/76) had fewer than 1000 proviral copies per 105 cells, and 13.2% (10/76) fell within the moderate range of 1001 to 9999 copies per 105 cells (Table 4 and Figure 2). Only 28.9% (22/76) of infected animals presented with high PVL (>10,000 copies per 105 cells), predominantly observed in CrPaCh and Sib breeds.
As shown Table 4, comparison of PVL in BLV-positive cattle for each sampled breeds in Latin America showed that Sib breed had the highest percentage of cattle showing high PVL of 10,000 proviral copies per 105 cell and it showed the highest PVL among the six breeds. By contrast, all of three cows in CrCoch breed belonged to PVL levels below 1000 proviral copies per 105 cells and it showed the lowest PVL among the six breeds. As shown in Figure 2, the order of intensity of BLV PVL among breeds was as follows: Sib breed > CrArPat breed > CrAr breed > CrPaCh breed > CrSaa > CrCoch breed.
Next, we summarized PVL in BLV-positive cattle for each sampled county in four Latin America countries (Table 5). Among BLV-positive individuals, three countries, Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay, had the highest proportion of cattle group with PVL levels below 1000 proviral copies per 105 cells among low, moderate and high PVL groups. By contrast, Cuba had the highest percentage of cattle group showing high PVL of 10,000 proviral copies per 105 cells. As shown in Figure 3, the order of intensity of BLV PVL among countries was as follows: Cuba > Argentina < Paraguay < Bolivia.

4. Discussion

Over the past several decades, BLV prevalence has been investigated across diverse cattle breeds and geographic regions. Polat et al. [2] provided a comprehensive summary of the data published to date. The risk of BLV infection and the associated proviral load are influenced by multiple factors, including geographic location, breed susceptibility (with Taurine breeds generally more vulnerable than Zebu), farm-level variation, production system (dairy herds typically exhibit higher infection rates than beef cattle), animal age, and the year of sampling [47,48,49]. Moreover, the reported prevalence is significantly affected by the diagnostic method employed [47]. Consequently, direct comparisons across studies are challenging and must account for these confounding variables to ensure accurate interpretation.
In the present study, six Latin American cattle breeds were screened for BLV infection using a quantitative PCR assay, revealing an overall prevalence of 31.1%. The proportion of BLV-positive animals varied markedly across breeds, ranging from 9.8% to 83.8%. Consistent with previous reports, high BLV prevalence levels have been documented throughout South America, with enzootic bovine leukosis present in most countries [2,23]. Individual infection rates reported across Latin America span a wide range (from below 20% to over 80%), depending on region, breed, and production system [16,18,19,21,23,24,25,26,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. Most of these studies have focused on transnational dairy and beef breeds such as Holstein, Angus, and Nellore. In contrast, data on BLV prevalence in native Latin American cattle remain limited. Reports have documented BLV infection in various Creole cattle populations and local composite breeds from Bolivia, Colombia, Brazil, and Panama [21,23,26,44,59,60,61,62]. These findings are summarized in Table 6. However, only one of these studies employed quantitative methods [23], with the majority relying on qualitative detection, thereby limiting insights into viral load and disease progression.
A comparative analysis of BLV prevalence across native cattle breeds and countries reveals substantial variability, ranging from 0% to over 90% (Table 6). The elevated infection rates observed in CrPaCh, CrSaa and CrArPat are consistent with the widespread circulation of BLV in Paraguay, Bolivia and Argentina, particularly among dairy breeds such as Holstein [23,38]. Polat et al. [23] reported average Holstein farm-level prevalences of 77.4% in Argentina, 65.3% in Bolivia, and 54.7% in Paraguay, respectively. Comparable prevalence levels have been reported in other Creole breeds, including Hartón del Valle (83.3%) and Chino Santadereano (60%) from Colombia and Guaymí (8%) from Panama [21,61]. Moderate infection rates were recorded in CrCoch (23.8%) and Yacumeño (20.37%) from Bolivia. These figures are notably lower than those observed in the Bolivian dual-purpose CrSaa breed (70%), which may reflect the influence of more intensive dairy production practices. However, this hypothesis warrants validation through studies with larger sample sizes. The CrAr population from Argentina exhibited a low BLV infection rate, estimated at 9.8%. Additional data from Creole breeds in Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador indicate intermediate prevalence levels ranging from 10% to 35% (Table 6). The Siboney breed from Cuba, a dairy composite developed in the 1970s through the crossbreeding of Holstein cattle with local Zebu to enhance milk production under tropical conditions, exhibited a relatively lower BLV prevalence (28.6%) compared to other composite breeds from Colombia, such as Lucerna and Velásquez, both with reported prevalences of 50% [21,44]. This reduced infection rate in Siboney may be partially attributable to the genetic contribution of Zebu (Bos indicus), which has been suggested to confer greater resistance to BLV, potentially mitigating the susceptibility associated with Taurine (Bos taurus) ancestry. However, the Velásquez breed, which includes approximately 25% Brahman genetics, also showed a prevalence of 50%, indicating that Zebu ancestry alone may not fully account for resistance. Additionally, Creole breeds across Latin America exhibit variable levels of Bos indicus introgression, typically lower in temperate and cold environments and higher in subtropical and tropical regions [63,64,65]. Nonetheless, current BLV prevalence data in Creole breeds from different countries do not reveal a consistent correlation between infection levels and the proportion of Zebu ancestry.
The BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR assay offers distinct advantages over conventional diagnostic methods. First, it enables the detection of a broad spectrum of BLV strains, including both known and potentially novel variants [35]. Second, it has enhanced sensitivity compared to that of other methods because it detects the BLV LTR region, which is present at two copies per provirus [35,66,67]. In previous study, our group evaluated the BLV provirus detection limit using BLV-infectious molecular clones (pBLV-IF2) by comparing to other two BLV proviral quantitative real-time PCR methods, such as TaqMan MGB assay targeting pol gene [68,69], and Cycleave assay targeting the tax gene [37]. The result shows that the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR assay could detect 100% (3/3) of pBLV-IF2 when present at 0.78125 copies per 105 cells, indicating that the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR assay has a high sensitivity [67]. Thus, analytical sensitivity using BLV-infectious molecular clones of the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR assay was found to be highly sensitive when compared with other real-time PCRs. Furthermore, we have successfully detected provirus in low-copy cows at one copy per 105 cells using 370 field cattle [70]. Currently, we show that the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR assay consistently detected BLV proviruses in low-copy cows at around 10 copies per 105 cells using 82 field cattle [71]. Thus, the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR assay has a high sensitivity for BLV provirus detection in diagnostic analysis using field samples. This discrepancy is largely attributable to sequence mismatches in the primer annealing regions, a common source of false negatives in conventional PCR and serological assays. The use of degenerate primers in the CoCoMo-qPCR assay effectively mitigates this issue. Importantly, BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR is a quantitative method that allows for precise estimation of proviral load, a critical parameter often overlooked in earlier prevalence studies, which typically reported only the proportion of infected animals. PVL has been positively correlated with the clinical progression of EBL, with higher BLV copy numbers associated with increased disease severity [35]. Moreover, PVL quantification may aid in identifying animals with natural resistance to BLV, offering a valuable tool for genetic studies aimed at uncovering markers of susceptibility or resilience.
As previously noted, BLV was detected across all studied breeds, with prevalence rates ranging from 9.8% to 83.8%. Notably, a substantial proportion of BLV-positive animals exhibited low proviral loads (PVL), with 57.9% harboring fewer than 1000 copies per 105 cells and 13.2% between 1001 and 9999 copies per 105 cells (Table 4 and Table 5). The highest proportions of animals with PVL exceeding 1000 copies were observed in the CrArPat and Siboney breeds. These findings suggest the potential presence of BLV-resistant individuals within certain Creole populations. Supporting this hypothesis, Hernández-Herrera et al. [44] reported that Hartón del Valle Creole cattle not only exhibited lower BLV infection rates but also showed reduced lymphocytosis, a more robust immune response, and significantly lower PVL compared to the Lucerna composite breed and Holstein. Collectively, these observations reinforce the notion that genetic resistance to elevated PVL and progression to enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) may exist in specific Creole breeds. While multiple studies in transnational breeds such as Holstein have consistently demonstrated a strong association between low PVL and reduced risk of disease progression, further clinical and longitudinal data in Creole cattle are needed to validate this resistance hypothesis in Latin American native breeds. Such evidence could support the inclusion of PVL-based resistance traits in selective breeding programs aimed at improving herd resilience and mitigating BLV-associated economic losses.

5. Conclusions

This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of BLV prevalence and PVL in native Latin American native cattle populations across a broad geographical range, using the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay. These findings offer novel insights into BLV epidemiology in underrepresented genetic backgrounds and lay the groundwork for future surveillance and control strategies in the region.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.G. and Y.A.; methodology, G.G. and A.B.; validation, G.G. and A.B.; formal analysis, G.G., A.B., O.M. and Y.A.; resources, A.L.V., J.A.P.R., M.F.O.M., L.A.C.R., R.D.M. and O.U.R.; data curation, G.G., A.B. and O.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.G.; writing—review and editing, Y.A.; supervision, Y.A.; project administration, Y.A.; funding acquisition, Y.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was founded by the FY2023 JSPS Invitation Fellowships for Research in Japan (Long-term).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Committee on Care and Use of Experimental Animals (CICUAL) from the School of Veterinary Sciences of the National University of La Plata (Buenos Aires, Argentina; protocols 89-1-18T, 41.2.14T).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the participating cattle farmers for their willingness to cooperate with this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aida, Y.; Murakami, H.; Takahashi, M.; Takeshima, S.N. Mechanisms of pathogenesis induced by bovine leukemia virus as a model for human T-cell leukemia virus. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Polat, M.; Takeshima, S.; Aida, Y. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of bovine leukemia virus. Virol. J. 2017, 14, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals: Chapter 2.4.11. In Enzootic Bovine Leukosis, 7th ed.; World Organization for Animal Health: Paris, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ott, S.; Johnson, R.; Wells, S.J. Association between bovine-leukosis virus seroprevalence and herd-level productivity on US dairy farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 2003, 61, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ruggiero, V.J.; Norby, B.; Benitez, O.J.; Hutchinson, H.; Sporer, K.; Droscha, C.; Swenson, C.L.; Bartlett, P.C. Controlling bovine leukemia virus in dairy herds by identifying and removing cows with the highest proviral load and lymphocyte counts. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 9165–9175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bartlett, P.C.; Norby, B.; Byrem, T.M.; Parmelee, A.; Ledergerber, J.T.; Erskine, R.J. Bovine leukemia virus and cow longevity in Michigan dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 1591–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuczewski, A.; Hogeveen, H.; Orsel, K.; Wolf, R.; Thompson, J.; Spackman, E.; van der Meer, F. Economic evaluation of 4 bovine leukemia virus control strategies for Alberta dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 2578–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nakada, S.; Fujimoto, Y.; Kohara, J.; Adachi, Y.; Makita, K. Estimation of economic loss by carcass weight reduction of Japanese dairy cows due to infection with bovine leukemia virus. Prev. Vet. Med. 2022, 198, 105528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leisering, A. Hypertrophy der Malpigischen Körpchen der Milz. Ber. Über Vet. Königreich Sachs. 1871, 16, 15–16. [Google Scholar]
  10. Acaite, J.; Tamosiunas, V.; Lukauskas, K.; Milius, J.; Pieskus, J. The eradication experience of enzootic bovine leukosis from Lithuania. Prev. Vet. Med. 2007, 82, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nuotio, L.; Rusanen, H.; Sihvonen, L.; Neuvonen, E. Eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis from Finland. Prev. Vet. Med. 2003, 59, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kettmann, R.; Burny, A.; Callebaut, I.; Droogmans, L.; Mammerickx, M.; Willems, L. Bovine leukemia virus. Retroviridae 1994, 3, 39–81. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pluta, A.; Jaworski, J.P.; Droscha, C.; VanderWeele, S.; Taxis, T.M.; Valas, S.; Brnić, D.; Jungić, A.; Ruano, M.J.; Sánchez, A.; et al. Inter laboratory comparison of eleven quantitative or digital PCR assays for detection of proviral bovine leukemia virus in blood samples. BMC Vet. Res. 2024, 20, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kuczewski, A.; Orsel, K.; Barkema, H.W.; Kelton, D.F.; Hutchins, W.A.; van der Meer, F.J.U. Short communication: Evaluation of 5 different ELISA for the detection of bovine leukemia virus antibodies. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 2433–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lv, G.; Wang, J.; Lian, S.; Wang, H.; Wu, R. The global epidemiology of bovine leukemia virus: Current trends and future implications. Animals 2024, 14, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. D’Angelino, J.; Garcia, M.; Birgel, E. Epidemiological study of enzootic bovine leukosis in Brazil. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 1998, 30, 13–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marín, C.; de López, N.M.; Álvarez, L.; Lozano, O.; España, W.; Castaños, H.; León, A. Epidemiology of bovine leukemia in Venezuela. Ann. Rech. Vet. 1978, 9, 4. [Google Scholar]
  18. Alfonso, R.; Almansa, J.E.; Barrera, J.D. Serological prevalence and evaluation of risk factors of enzootic bovine leukosis in the Sabana de Bogota region and the Ubate and Chiquinquira valleys of Colombia. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epizoot. 1998, 17, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Felmer, R.; Munoz, G.; Zuniga, J.; Recabal, M. Molecular analysis of a 444 bp fragment of the bovine leukaemia virus gp51 env gene reveals a high frequency of non-silent point mutations and suggests the presence of two subgroups of BLV in Chile. Vet. Microbiol. 2005, 108, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moratorio, G.; Obal, G.; Dubra, A.; Correa, A.; Bianchi, S.; Buschiazzo, A.; Cristina, J.; Pritsch, O. Phylogenetic analysis of bovine leukemia viruses isolated in South America reveals diversification in seven distinct genotypes. Arch. Virol. 2010, 155, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hernández-Herrera, D.Y.; Posso-Terranova, A.; Benavides, J.; Muñoz-Florez, J.; Giovambattista, G.; Álvarez-Franco, L. Bovine leukosis virus detection in Creole Colombian breeds using nested-PCR. Acta Agronómica 2011, 60, 311–317. [Google Scholar]
  22. Benavides, B.; Quevedo, D.; Cruz, M. Epidemiological study of bovine leukemia virus in dairy cows in six herds in the municipality of Pasto Nariño. Rev. Lasallista Investig. 2013, 10, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
  23. Polat, M.; Takeshima, S.N.; Hosomichi, K.; Kim, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Yamada, K.; Arainga, M.; Murakami, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; de la Barra Diaz, V.; et al. A new genotype of bovine leukemia virus in South America identified by NGS-based whole genome sequencing and molecular evolutionary genetic analysis. Retrovirology 2016, 13, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Y.; Kelly, P.J.; Bai, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, C. First molecular characterization of bovine leukemia virus infections in the Caribbean. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Corredor-Figueroa, A.P.; Salas, S.; Olaya-Galán, N.N.; Quintero, J.S.; Fajardo, Á.; Soñora, M.; Moreno, P.; Cristina, J.; Sánchez, A.; Tobón, J.; et al. Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of bovine leukemia virus in Colombian cattle. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 80, 104171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jaimes-Dueñez, J.; Goyeneche-Ortiz, E.; Tique-Oviedo, M.; Ortiz-Pineda, M.C.; Cardenas-Pinto, L.; Jimenez-Leaño, A.P.; Ruiz-Saenz, J. Molecular frequency of bovine leukemia virus in Creole cattle of Eastern Colombia. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2024, 25, 100372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Giovambattista, G.; Ripoli, M.V.; Peral-García, P.; Bouzat, J.L. Indigenous domestic breeds as reservoirs of genetic diversity: The Argentinean Creole cattle. Anim. Genet. 2001, 32, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ortega, M.F.; Giovambattista, G.; Cutullé, C.; Santos, D.D.; Nava, S.; Bonamy, M.; Holgado, F. Phenotypic evaluation of genetic resistance to the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Argentine Creole cattle. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2023, 14, 102223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jacobsen, K.L.; Kaneene, J.B.; Miller, J.M.; Bull, R.W. Comparison of the commercial agar-gel immunodiffusion test and radioimmunoprecipitation assay for detection of antibodies to bovine leukemia virus. Vet. Microbiol. 1985, 46, 1430–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Klintevall, K.; Ballagi-Pordány, A.; Näslund, K.; Belák, S. Bovine leukaemia virus: Rapid detection of proviral DNA by nested PCR in blood and organs of experimentally infected calves. Vet. Microbiol. 1994, 42, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martin, D.; Arjona, A.; Soto, I.; Barquero, N.; Viana, M.; Gómez-Lucía, E. Comparative study of PCR as a direct assay and ELISA and AGID as indirect assays for the detection of bovine leukaemia virus. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 2001, 48, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rola, M.; Kuzmak, J. The detection of bovine leukemia virus proviral DNA by PCR–ELISA. J. Virol. Methods 2002, 101, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jaworski, J.P.; Pluta, A.; Rola-Łuszczak, M.; McGowan, S.L.; Finnegan, C.; Heenemann, K.; Carignano, H.A.; Alvarez, I.; Murakami, K.; Willems, L.; et al. Interlaboratory Comparison of Six Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Bovine Leukemia Virus Proviral DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e00304-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ruggiero, V.J.; Bartlett, P.C. Control of Bovine Leukemia Virus in Three US Dairy Herds by Culling ELISA-Positive Cows. Vet. Med. Int. 2019, 2019, 3202184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jimba, M.; Takeshima, S.N.; Matoba, K.; Endoh, D.; Aida, Y. BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR: Quantitation of bovine leukemia virus proviral load using the CoCoMo algorithm. Retrovirology 2010, 7, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kobayashi, T.; Inagaki, Y.; Ohnuki, N.; Sato, R.; Murakami, S.; Imakawa, K. Increasing bovine leukemia virus (BLV) proviral load is a risk factor for progression of enzootic bovine leucosis: A prospective study in Japan. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019, 178, 104680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Somura, Y.; Sugiyama, E.; Fujikawa, H.; Murakami, K. Comparison of the copy numbers of bovine leukemia virus in the lymph nodes of cattle with enzootic bovine leukosis and cattle with latent infection. Arch. Virol. 2014, 159, 2693–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Juliarena, M.A.; Barrios, C.N.; Ceriani, M.C.; Esteban, E.N. Hot topic: Bovine leukemia virus (BLV)-infected cows with low proviral load are not a source of infection for BLV-free cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 4586–4589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sato, H.; Watanuki, S.; Murakami, H.; Sato, R.; Ishizaki, H.; Aida, Y. Development of a luminescence syncytium induction assay (LuSIA) for easily detecting and quantitatively measuring bovine leukemia virus infection. Arch. Virol. 2018, 163, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bai, L.; Borjigin, L.; Sato, H.; Takeshima, S.N.; Asaji, S.; Ishizaki, H.; Kawashima, K.; Obuchi, Y.; Sunaga, S.; Ando, A.; et al. Kinetic Study of BLV Infectivity in BLV Susceptible and Resistant Cattle in Japan from 2017 to 2019. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Borjigin, L.; Watanuki, S.; Hamada, R.; Bai, L.; Hirose, T.; Sato, H.; Yoneyama, S.; Yasui, A.; Yasuda, S.; Yamanaka, R.; et al. Effectiveness of integrated bovine leukemia virus eradication strategies utilizing cattle carrying resistant and susceptible histocompatibility complex class II DRB3 alleles. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 9393–9409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fechner, H.; Blankenstein, P.; Looman, A.C.; Elwert, J.; Geue, L.; Albrecht, C.; Kurg, A.; Beier, D.; Marquardt, O.; Ebner, D. Provirus variants of the bovine leukemia virus and their relation to the serological status of naturally infected cattle. Virology 1997, 237, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rodríguez, S.M.; Golemba, M.D.; Campos, R.H.; Trono, K.; Jones, L.R. Bovine leukemia virus can be classified into seven genotypes: Evidence for the existence of two novel clades. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 2788–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hernández, D.; Muñoz, J.; Álvarez, L. Dinámica de la Leucosis Bovina en el ganado criollo Hartón del Valle en infección natural. Arch. Zootec. 2016, 65, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hernández, D.; Montes, D.; De La Ossa-V, J. The Proviral Load of the Bovine Leukosis Virus is Associated with the Polymorphisms of the BoLA-DRB3 Gene in the Harton del Valle Breed. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2018, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Takeshima, S.N.; Kitamura-Muramatsu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Polat, M.; Saito, S.; Aida, Y. BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2: Improvements to the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR assay for bovine leukemia virus by reducing primer degeneracy and constructing an optimal standard curve. Arch. Virol. 2015, 160, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kobayashi, S.; Hidano, A.; Tsutsui, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Hayama, Y.; Nishida, T.; Muroga, N.; Konishi, M.; Kameyama, K.; Murakami, K. Analysis of risk factors associated with bovine leukemia virus seropositivity within dairy and beef breeding farms in Japan: A nationwide survey. Res. Vet. Sci. 2014, 96, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ohno, A.; Takeshima, S.N.; Matsumoto, Y.; Aida, Y. Risk factors associated with increased bovine leukemia virus proviral load in infected cattle in Japan from 2012 to 2014. Virus Res. 2015, 210, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Murakami, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Konishi, M.; Kameyama, K.; Tsutsui, T. Nationwide survey of bovine leukemia virus infection among dairy and beef breeding cattle in Japan from 2009–2011. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2013, 75, 1123–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chung, A.H. Bovine leukaemia virus infection in Peru. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 1983, 15, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ducreux, F.; Arrieta, E.; Jiminez, C.; Moreno, E.; Rodríguez, L. Estudios sobre leucosis viral bovina en ganado Bos indicus en Costa Rica. Cienc. Vet. 1987, 9, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Castro, R.S.; Leite, R.C.; Abreu, J.J.; Lage, A.P.; Ferraz, I.B.; Lobato, Z.I.; Balsamão, S.L. Prevalence of antibodies to selected viruses in bovine embryo donors and recipients from Brazil, and its implications in international embryo trade. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 1992, 24, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Molnár, É.; Molnár, L.; Dias, H.; Silva, A.; Vale, W. Occurrence of enzootic bovine leukosis in the State of Pará, Brazil. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 1999, 19, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Trono, K.G.; Pérez-Filgueira, D.M.; Duffy, S.; Borca, M.V.; Carrillo, C. Seroprevalence of bovine leukemia virus in dairy cattle in Argentina: Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of different detection methods. Vet. Microbiol. 2001, 83, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Monti, G.; Schrijver, R.; Beier, D. Genetic diversity and spread of Bovine leukaemia virus isolates in Argentine dairy cattle. Arch. Virol. 2005, 150, 443–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Monti, G.E.; Frankena, K.; Engel, B.; Buist, W.; Tarabla, H.D.; de Jong, M.C.M. Evaluation of a new antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of bovine leukemia virus infection in dairy cattle. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2005, 17, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Delgado, I.; Alfonso, A.; Martínez, N.; Abeledo, M.; Rodrigues, M.; Barrera, M. Presencia de anticuerpos al virus de la leucosis bovina en rebaños pertenecientes a las provincias occidentales y centrales de Cuba. Rev. Salud Anim. 2009, 31, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  58. Heinecke, N.; Tórtora, J.; Martínez, H.A.; González-Fernández, V.D.; Ramírez, H. Detection and genotyping of bovine leukemia virus in Mexican cattle. Arch. Virol. 2017, 162, 3191–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Freitas, T.M.S.; Dias, J.M.; Veríssimo, A.C.F.; Lobo, J.R.; Costa, G.L.; Moura, M.I.; Landi, V.; Martínez, A.M.; Carmo, A.S.; Soares, F.M.C. Population Structure of Curraleiro Pé-Duro Cattle and its Relationship with the Serological Profile Against Pathogens of Economic and Zoonotic Interest. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 872660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fonteque, G.V.; Casa, M.S.; Ribeiro, G.S.N.; Silva, Z.; Vogel, C.I.G.; Fonteque, J.H.; Costa, U.M.; Saito, M.E.; Giovambattista, G.; Takeshima, S.-N.; et al. Quantifying the enzootic leukosis virus threat: How prevalent is the natural infection in Crioulo Lageano cattle in southern Brazil? Braz. J. Biol. 2025, 85, 291923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Villalobos-Cortes, A.; Franco, S.; González, R.; Jaén, M. Nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) based diagnosis of bovine leukemia virus in Panama. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 16, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saa, L.R.; Guzmán, L.T.; Fierro, N.C.; Castro, L.M.; Reyes-Bueno, F.; Carbonero, A. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with bovine leukemia virus (BLV) seropositivity in cattle herds from Ecuador. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Pecu. 2021, 34, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lirón, J.P.; Peral-García, P.; Giovambattista, G. Genetic characterization of Argentine and Bolivian Creole cattle breeds assessed through microsatellites. J. Hered. 2006, 97, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ginja, C.; Gama, L.T.; Cortés, O.; Burriel, I.M.; Vega-Pla, J.L.; Penedo, C.; Sponenberg, P.; Cañón, J.; Sanz, A.; do Egito, A.A.; et al. The genetic ancestry of American Creole cattle inferred from uniparental and autosomal genetic markers. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11486, Erratum in Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73066-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Marcuzzi, O.; Calcaterra, F.; Loza Vega, A.; Ortega Masaguém, M.F.; Armstrong, E.; Pereira Rico, J.A.; Jara, E.; Olivera, L.H.; Peral García, P.; Giovambattista, G. Genomic analysis of inbreeding level, kinship and breed relationships in Creole cattle from South America. Anim. Genet. 2024, 55, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rahman, M.M.; Badr, Y.; Kamatari, Y.O.; Kitamura, Y.; Shimizu, K.; Okada, A.; Inoshima, Y. Data on proteomic analysis of milk extracellular vesicles from bovine leukemia virus-infected cattle. Data Brief 2020, 33, 106510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rahman, M.M.; Ishikawa, H.; Yamauchi, M.; Takashima, S.; Kamatari, Y.O.; Shimizu, K.; Okada, A.; Inoshima, Y. Characterization of mRNA Signature in Milk Small Extracellular Vesicles from Cattle Infected with Bovine Leukemia Virus. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lew, A.E.; Bock, R.E.; Miles, J.; Cuttell, L.B.; Steer, P.; Nadin-Davis, S.A. Sensitive and specific detection of bovine immunodeficiency virus and bovine syncytial virus by 5′ Taq nuclease assays with fluorescent 3′ minor groove binder-DNA probes. J. Virol. Methods 2004, 116, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yoneyama, S.; Kobayashi, S.; Matsunaga, T.; Tonosaki, K.; Leng, D.; Sakai, Y.; Yamada, S.; Kimura, A.; Ichijo, T.; Hikono, H.; et al. Comparative Evaluation of Three Commercial Quantitative Real-Time PCRs Used in Japan for Bovine Leukemia Virus. Viruses 2022, 14, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jimba, M.; Takeshima, S.N.; Murakami, H.; Kohara, J.; Kobayashi, N.; Matsuhashi, T.; Ohmori, T.; Nunoya, T.; Aida, Y. BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR: A useful tool for evaluating bovine leukemia virus infection status. BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 8, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Watanuki, S.; Shoji, K.; Izawa, M.; Okami, M.; Ye, Y.; Bao, A.; Liu, Y.; Saitou, E.; Sugiyama, K.; Endo, M.; et al. Development of a dry- and liquid-duplex-reagent mix-based polymerase chain reaction assay as a novel tool for the rapid and easy quantification of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) proviral loads. Viruses 2024, 16, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 14 01005 g001
Figure 1. Sampling sites: 1. Argentine Creole (CrAr), 2. Patagonian Argentine Creole (CrArPat), 3. Pampa Chaqueño Creole from Paraguay (CrPaCh), 4. Bolivian Creole from Cochabamba department (CrCoch), 5. Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa), and 6. the Siboney from Cuba composite breed (Sib).
Figure 1. Sampling sites: 1. Argentine Creole (CrAr), 2. Patagonian Argentine Creole (CrArPat), 3. Pampa Chaqueño Creole from Paraguay (CrPaCh), 4. Bolivian Creole from Cochabamba department (CrCoch), 5. Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa), and 6. the Siboney from Cuba composite breed (Sib).
Pathogens 14 01005 g001
Pathogens 14 01005 g002
Figure 2. BLV infectious in six Latin American native cattle populations using the CoCoMo2 qPCR method. Argentine Creole (CrAr), Patagonian Argentine Creole (CrArPat), Pampa Chaqueño Creole from Paraguay (CrPaCh), Bolivian Creole from Cochabamba department (CrCoch), Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa), and the Siboney from Cuba composite breed (Sib).
Figure 2. BLV infectious in six Latin American native cattle populations using the CoCoMo2 qPCR method. Argentine Creole (CrAr), Patagonian Argentine Creole (CrArPat), Pampa Chaqueño Creole from Paraguay (CrPaCh), Bolivian Creole from Cochabamba department (CrCoch), Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa), and the Siboney from Cuba composite breed (Sib).
Pathogens 14 01005 g002
Pathogens 14 01005 g003
Figure 3. BLV infectious in four Latin American countries using the CoCoMo2 qPCR method. Argentina, Paraguay, Bolivia and Cuba.
Figure 3. BLV infectious in four Latin American countries using the CoCoMo2 qPCR method. Argentina, Paraguay, Bolivia and Cuba.
Pathogens 14 01005 g003
Table 1. Main characteristic of the studied native breed/population.
Table 1. Main characteristic of the studied native breed/population.
BreedSample
Size 		Breed
Origin		Sample
Site		Production PurposeEnvironment
Argentine Creole (CrAr)112ArgentinaTucumán provinceBeefSubtropical to temperate
Argentine Patagonian Creole23ArgentinaBuenos Aires provinceBeefTemperate to cold
(CrArPat)
Bolivian Highland Creole (CrCoch)13BoliviaCochabamba departmentBeefHighland plain
Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa)10BoliviaSanta Cruz departmentBeef and dairySubtropical plain
Pampa Chaqueño Creole (CrPaCh)37ParaguayParaguayan ChacoBeef Dry forest
Siboney de Cuba (Sib)49CubaLa Havana province, CubaDairySubtropical plain
Table 2. Detection of BLV infection in six native bovine breeds from Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Cuba by CoCoMo-quantitative PCR (qPCR).
Table 2. Detection of BLV infection in six native bovine breeds from Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Cuba by CoCoMo-quantitative PCR (qPCR).
BreedPositive No. a/Tested Samples No. (Positive %)
Argentine Creole (CrAr)11/112 (9.8)
Argentine Patagonian Creole (CrArPat)10/23 (43.5)
Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa)7/10 (70.0)
Bolivian Highland Creole (CrCoch)3/13 (23.8)
Pampa Chaqueño (CrPaCh)31/37 (83.8)
Siboney (Sib)14/49 (28.6)
Total breeds76/244 (31.1)
a no = number; CrAr = Argentine Creole; CrArPat = Argentine Patagonian Creole; CrCoch = Cochabamba; Saavedreño (CrSaa); Pampa Chaqueño (CrPaCh); Siboney (Sib).
Table 3. Detection of BLV infection in native cattle from Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Cuba by CoCoMo-quantitative PCR (qPCR).
Table 3. Detection of BLV infection in native cattle from Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Cuba by CoCoMo-quantitative PCR (qPCR).
CountryPositive No.a/Tested Samples No. (Positive %)
Argentina21/135 (15.6)
Bolivia10/23 (43.5)
Paraguay31/37 (83.8)
Cuba14/49 (28.6)
Total breeds76/244 (31.1)
a no = number.
Table 4. BLV prevalence and proviral load estimated using the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay in six local cattle breeds/populations from Latin American, including Argentine Creole (CrAr), Patagonian Argentine Creole (CrArPat), Pampa Chaqueño Creole from Paraguay (CrPaCh), Bolivian Creole from Cochabamba department (CrCoch), Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa), and the Siboney from Cuba composite breed (Sib).
Table 4. BLV prevalence and proviral load estimated using the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay in six local cattle breeds/populations from Latin American, including Argentine Creole (CrAr), Patagonian Argentine Creole (CrArPat), Pampa Chaqueño Creole from Paraguay (CrPaCh), Bolivian Creole from Cochabamba department (CrCoch), Saavedreño Creole (CrSaa), and the Siboney from Cuba composite breed (Sib).
BreedBLV–
Positive n a		PVL b (Copy/105 Cells)Mean Value (Range)
1–1000 n (%)1001–9999 n (%)≥10,000
n (%)
CrAr118 (72.7)1 (9.1)2 (18.2)9746 (3–79,740)
CrArPat105 (50.0)2 (20.0)3 (30.0)12,256 (13–63,263)
CrSaa75 (71.4) 2 (28.6)0 (0.0)5977 (5–26,435)
CrCoch33 (100.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)76 (21–119)
CrPaCh3118 (58.1)4 (12.9)9 (29.0)9124 (1–61,161)
Sib145 (35.7)1 (7.2)8 (57.1)14,250 (1–37,009)
Total7644 (57.9)10 (13.2)22 (28.9)9923 (1–79,740)
a n = number of cattle; b PVL = proviral load.
Table 5. BLV prevalence and proviral load estimated using the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay in local cattle breeds/populations from Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Cuba.
Table 5. BLV prevalence and proviral load estimated using the BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay in local cattle breeds/populations from Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Cuba.
CountryBLV–
Positive n a		PVL b (Copy/105 Cells)Mean Value (Range)
1–1000
n (%)		1001–9999
n (%)		≥10,000
n (%)
Argentina2113 (61.9)3 (14.29)5 (23.8)9746 (3–79,740)
Bolivia108 (80.0)2 (20.0)0 (0.0)4207 (5–26,435)
Paraguay3118 (58.1)4 (12.9)9 (29.0)9124 (1–61,161)
Cuba145 (35.7)1 (7.2)8 (57.1)14,250 (1–37,009)
Total7644 (57.9)10 (13.2)22 (29.0)9923 (1–79,740)
a n = number of cattle; b PVL = proviral load.
Table 6. Comparison of BLV prevalence among Creole cattle and local composite breeds from Latin America.
Table 6. Comparison of BLV prevalence among Creole cattle and local composite breeds from Latin America.
BreedTypedCountryUsed Methodn aBLV b Prevalence (%)Reference
Argentine CreoleCreoleArgentinaCoCoMo qPCR1129.8 (11/112)This work
Argentine Patagonian CreoleCreoleArgentinaCoCoMo qPCR2343.5 (10/23)This work
Pampa ChaqueñoCreoleParaguayCoCoMo qPCR3783.2 (31/37)This work
SaavedreñoCreoleBoliviaCoCoMo qPCR1070 (7/10)This work
Cochabamba CreoleCreoleBoliviaCoCoMo qPCR1323.1 (3/13)This work
YacumeñoCreoleBoliviaCoCoMo qPCR13020.37 (22/108)[23]
LageanoCreoleBrazilstandard PCR30836.69 (113/308)[60]
Curraleiro Pé-DuroCreoleBrazilELISA59618.29 (109/596)[59]
Blanco OrijinegroCreoleColombianested PCR300 (0/30)[21]
CasareñoCreoleColombianested PCR3026.7 (8/30)[21]
CasareñoCreoleColombianested PCR7316.4 (12/73)[26]
Costeño con CuernosCreoleColombianested PCR3023.3 (7/30)[21]
Chino SantandereanoCreoleColombianested PCR3060 (18/30)[21]
Chino SantandereanoCreoleColombianested PCR10835.1 (38/108)[26]
CaqueñoCreoleColombianested PCR3016.7 (5/30)[21]
Hartón del ValleCreoleColombianested PCR3083.3 (25/30)[21]
Hartón del ValleCreoleColombianested PCR, qPCR9318.9 (18/93)[44]
RomosinuanoCreoleColombianested PCR300 (0/30)[21]
SanmartineanoCreoleColombianested PCR300 (0/30)[21]
SanmartineanoCreoleColombianested PCR7223.6 (17/72)[26]
Peruvian CreoleCreolePerúAGIDndnd[24]
SiboneyComposite cCubaCoCoMo qPCR4928.6 (14/49)This work
LucernaComposite dColombianested PCR3050 (15/30)[21]
LucernaComposite dColombianested PCR, qPCR2448.5 (17/72)[44]
VelásquezComposite eColombianested PCR3050 (15/30)[21]
CreoleCreoleEcuadorELISA160410.6 (170/1604)[62]
GuaymíCreolePanamánested PCR4080 (32/40)[61]
a n = number of cattle, b PVL = proviral load, c 5/8 Holstein Friesian—3/8 local Zebu, d 40% Friesian—30% Hartón—30% Shorthorn, and e 40% Red Poll—25% Brahman—25% Romosinuano. nd = not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giovambattista, G.; Bao, A.; Marcuzzi, O.; Vega, A.L.; Rico, J.A.P.; Ortega Masague, M.F.; Rojas, L.A.C.; Martinez, R.D.; Reinosa, O.U.; Aida, Y. Detection of Bovine Leukemia Virus in Argentine, Bolivian, Paraguayan and Cuban Native Cattle Using a Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay-BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2. Pathogens 2025, 14, 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14101005

AMA Style

Giovambattista G, Bao A, Marcuzzi O, Vega AL, Rico JAP, Ortega Masague MF, Rojas LAC, Martinez RD, Reinosa OU, Aida Y. Detection of Bovine Leukemia Virus in Argentine, Bolivian, Paraguayan and Cuban Native Cattle Using a Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay-BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2. Pathogens. 2025; 14(10):1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14101005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giovambattista, Guillermo, Aronggaowa Bao, Olivia Marcuzzi, Ariel Loza Vega, Juan Antonio Pereira Rico, Maria Florencia Ortega Masague, Liz Aurora Castro Rojas, Ruben Dario Martinez, Odalys Uffo Reinosa, and Yoko Aida. 2025. "Detection of Bovine Leukemia Virus in Argentine, Bolivian, Paraguayan and Cuban Native Cattle Using a Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay-BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2" Pathogens 14, no. 10: 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14101005

APA Style

Giovambattista, G., Bao, A., Marcuzzi, O., Vega, A. L., Rico, J. A. P., Ortega Masague, M. F., Rojas, L. A. C., Martinez, R. D., Reinosa, O. U., & Aida, Y. (2025). Detection of Bovine Leukemia Virus in Argentine, Bolivian, Paraguayan and Cuban Native Cattle Using a Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay-BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR-2. Pathogens, 14(10), 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14101005

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop