Isoniazid and Rifampicin Resistance-Conferring Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from South Africa
by
, , , and
Afsatou Ndama Traoré
*,
Mpumelelo Casper Rikhotso
,
Marry Avheani Mphaphuli
,
Sana Mustakahmed Patel
,
Hafsa Ali Mahamud
,
Leonard Owino Kachienga
,
Jean-Pierre Kabue
and
Natasha Potgieter
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering & Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(8), 1015; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081015
Submission received: 10 July 2023
/
Revised: 30 July 2023
/
Accepted: 2 August 2023
/
Published: 4 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Tuberculosis Prevention, Treatment, Care and Drugs)
Abstract
:Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb), remains a significant global health issue, with high morbidity and mortality rates. The emergence of drug-resistant strains, particularly multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), poses difficult challenges to TB control efforts. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis investigated the prevalence of and molecular insights into isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance-conferring mutations in M. tb isolates from South Africa. Through systematic search and analysis of 11 relevant studies, we determined the prevalence of gene mutations associated with RIF and INH resistance, such as rpoB, katG, and inhA. The findings demonstrated a high prevalence of specific mutations, including S450L in rpoB, and S315T, which are linked to resistance against RIF and INH, respectively. These results contribute to the understanding of drug resistance mechanisms and provide valuable insights for the development of targeted interventions against drug-resistant TB.
1. Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb), continues to be a major global health issue [1]. It is the highest cause of mortality caused by a single infectious agent, surpassing human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome HIV/AIDS [2]. Despite global reductions in TB incidence and death during the last few decades, in 2019, it was estimated that 10 million people were infected with TB and 1.41 million people died from the disease [1].
In many low- and middle-income countries, TB/HIV co-infection and the emergence of MDR-TB strains have become significant obstacles in the fight against TB [3]. Multidrug-resistant TB (MDR TB) is caused by TB bacteria that are resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampin [1]. Antimycobacterial drug resistance is threatening TB prevention and control efforts, and TB continues to be a major public health problem on a global scale [3]. Rifampicin (RIF), also known as rifampin, is an ansamycin antibiotic used to treat several types of bacterial infections, including tuberculosis. Isoniazid (INH), also known as isonicotinic acid hydrazide, is an antibiotic used for the treatment of tuberculosis. The rpoB gene codes for the RNA polymerase β subunit, which is the target of rifampicin. KatG is an enzyme that functions as both catalase and peroxidase. Its mutation is the cause for Mycobacterium (specifically M. tuberculosis) resistance to the drug isoniazid, which targets the mycolic acids within the tuberculosis bacteria. InhA (enoyl-ACP reductase) is an essential component of the mycobacterial FAS-II system responsible for mycolic acid synthesis, particularly in M. tuberculosis. In 2019, there were approximately 500,000 new cases of RIF-resistant TB globally, 78% of which were MDR-TB [1]. M. tb drug resistance develops because of spontaneous gene mutations that limit the bacterium’s sensitivity to the most-used anti-TB drugs. These genes can encode drug targets or drug metabolism pathways, which can affect the efficacy of anti-TB therapy [1].
Numerous previous studies [4,5,6] identified various genes that encode anti-TB drug targets and briefly discussed various mechanisms of resistance to RIF and INH. More than 95% of RIF resistance is associated with rpoB gene alterations in an 81-bp area. INH resistance appears to be more complex and has been linked to numerous genes, most notably katG and the inhA promoter region. The most frequent gene mutations causing RIF and INH resistance in M. tb have not yet been evaluated in a comprehensive study and meta-analysis in South Africa. To further understand the overall proportion of phenotypic INH and RIF resistance explained by existing single or canonical gene mutations, the estimated pooled prevalence of RIF resistance-associated gene mutations, as well as the frequencies of co-occurring or multiple mutations, were investigated in the current review.
Understanding the incidence and prevalence of drug resistance-conferring mutations linked to RIF- and INH-resistant M. tb is thus crucial. To determine the incidence and predominance of the most prevalent gene mutations linked to phenotypic RIF and INH resistance in M. tb, a comprehensive review and meta-analysis was conducted in South Africa.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Protocol
The research was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) protocol to search records from online databases, perform paper screening by title and abstract, and conduct assessment of the full-text suitability for systematic review and meta-analysis (Figure 1).
2.2. Databases and Search Strategy
PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar electronic sources were searched for articles written in English, for a period of five years (2018–2022). Studies that reported gene mutations conferring RIF and INH resistance in M. tb in South Africa were included in the analysis. The following specific key terms for databases searching were used: Mycobacterium tuberculosis OR tuberculosis AND INH OR isoniazid AND RIF OR rifampicin AND resistance OR resistant AND mutations OR sequence AND South Africa. A total of 5243 studies were retrieved from the database, as shown in Table 1. Overall, 11 studies were selected for inclusion in the review based on the inclusion criteria, whereas a total of 5232 were eliminated from the review due to not being eligible for inclusion.
2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The review conducted a comprehensive analysis of observational studies in South Africa that focused on diagnosing resistance to Rifampicin (RIF) and Isoniazid (INH) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) using approved molecular drug susceptibility testing (DST) tools recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Our study aimed to identify gene mutations associated with RIF and INH resistance and to determine the prevalence of drug resistance in different forms of tuberculosis (TB) cases.
The review included the studies that met the following inclusion criteria: studies reporting mechanisms of anti-TB drug resistance or gene mutations associated with RIF and INH resistance in M. tb, providing data on the prevalence of anti-TB drug resistance among TB patients, including both newly diagnosed and re-treated cases, utilizing standard WHO-approved molecular DST tools for TB diagnosis, and published research conducted in South Africa and available in the English language. The review excluded studies that did not meet the following exclusion criteria: studies that did not report mechanisms of anti-TB drug resistance or gene mutations associated with RIF and INH resistance, studies that did not focus on TB drug resistance prevalence in TB patients, studies that did not use standard WHO-approved molecular DST tools, and studies conducted outside South Africa or published in languages other than English.
2.4. Data Extraction
The following data were extracted from the inclusion studies: author(s) name; year of publication; study period; study region; type of TB patients; study design; molecular DST method(s); sample size; total positive cases; total M. tb isolates for which DST was performed; frequency of any anti-TB drug resistance, any INH or RIF resistance, and MDR-TB; and gene mutations associated with RIF and INH resistance.
2.5. Meta-Analysis
The meta-analysis was undertaken with the primary objective of providing transparent, objective, and reproducible summaries of the study outcomes (Figure 2). In the statistical analysis of data obtained from cohort, medical, and intervention studies, odds ratios were employed as the measure of choice to assess the strength of the association between events and their respective outcomes. Through this meta-analysis, we investigated the association between the prevalence of positive cases and resistance to Rifampicin (RIF) and Isoniazid (NIH), in conjunction with gene mutations (Figure 2).
The magnitude of the association between the occurrences was assessed using odds ratios (ORs). A positive link between the variables was established when the OR exceeded zero; conversely, if the OR was less than zero, no positive association was observed. The findings of the meta-analysis, as depicted in Figure 2, revealed a notable level of heterogeneity among the included studies. The study also found heterogeneity which indicated that there were substantial variations in the results and methodologies among the studies incorporated in the meta-analysis (Figure 2). This heterogeneity could have been the differences in study populations, data collection methods, or study designs.
R Programming was used to carry out statistical analysis. Random effects models were used to estimate the overall effect size for variation between studies and to provide estimates of heterogeneity. The “rma” function from the package “Metafor” was used for conducting meta-analyses and estimating the overall effect size. Heterogeneity was measured, and Cochran’s Q test was used to assess heterogeneity in the meta-analysis. A forest plot of the meta-analysis was generated to display the effect sizes and confidence intervals of inclusion studies. The inclusion studies variability was determined statistically in the R statistical tool. The heterogeneity measure (I2) provided an estimate of the proportion of variability in a meta-analysis that is explained by differences between the included studies rather than by sampling error.
3. Results
3.1. Search Results
As shown in Figure 1, a total of 5243 studies were retrieved through the search engines. Of the overall studies, a total of 5232 were eliminated from the review due to not meeting the criteria. Only 11 studies on the prevalence of gene mutations associated with RIF- and INH-resistant M. tb in South Africa were included in the review.
3.2. Characteristics of Studies Included
The studies, as shown in Table 1, were eleven in total, from which eight were conducted in Western Cape, two were from Free State, KwaZulu-Natal and the remaining studies were from Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Northwest and Limpopo. Most of these studies (7/11; 63.6%) were conducted between 1–3 years. The majority of the studies (10/11; 90.9%) were of pulmonary TB patients and 2/11 (18.2%) studies had retrospective studies, 2/11 (18.2%) prospective studies, 1/11 (9.1%) a retrospective cohort study, 1/11 (9.1%) a prospective cohort study, 1/11 (9.1%) a prospective multi-center diagnostic study, 1/11 (9.1%) a multi-center study, 1/11 (9.1%) a descriptive study, and 1/11 (9.1%) a multicenter observational study. Whole-genome sequencing method (Illumina HiSeq 2500) was used in 4/11 (36.4%) studies. A total of 3/11 (27.3%) studies used GeneXpert MTB/RIF, GenoType MTBDRplus, and BD MAX MDR-TB assay, making them the most common molecular DST methods used.
According to Table 1, the total number of patients who participated was 51,623. Among those who participated, 43,580 (84%) patients were found to be M-TB positive, and the number of isolates obtained after performing DST was 650 (1.2%). Among the positive cases, a total of 3637 (7%) cases were found to be drug resistant TB. In addition, a total of 2995 (6%) of the cases were INH-resistant, 3460 (7%) were RIF-resistant, and 2909 (6%) were MDR. The mutations for katG were found to be 885 (2%), and 2457 (5%) patients had mutations in the inhA promoter region. Furthermore, katG + inhA mutations were detected in 404 (1%) patients, while none of the samples had mutations on both rpoB + katG genes [Table 1].
3.3. Prevalence of any Rifampicin (RIF) or Isoniazid (INH) Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates
The variance of the anti-TB resistance differs from geographical location and economic status of the populations of the country. The prevalence of any anti-TB drug resistance varied among the studies and geographical locations in South Africa. The study also revealed that 4/11 (36.4%) of the studies reported a prevalence of any anti-TB drug resistance ranging from 0.5 to 3%, with three of the studies reported in the Western Cape and two other studies reported in KZN and Free state, respectively, with a prevalence of less than 3%. A higher prevalence of over 80% was reported in studies from Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Northwest, and Limpopo (Table 1). In addition, the study further reported that the prevalence of any RIF and INH-resistant M. tb was below 15% in 10/11 (91%) studies from Western Cape, Free State, and KZN, with 1/11 (9%) reporting over 60% in studies from Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Northwest, and Limpopo [Table 1]. On the prevalence of MDR-TB, 2/11 (18%) studies reported over 30% from Western Cape and Free-state, respectively, while the remaining studies reported less than 10% prevalence of MDR-TB (Table 1).
3.4. Frequency of rpoB, katG and inhA promoter Mutations
A total of 2995 (6%) M. tb strains with any INH resistance were identified using standard WHO-approved molecular diagnostic methods, among which a higher proportion of mutations was detected in the katG gene 885 (2%) compared with the inhA promoter region 2457 (5%) according to Table 1. In addition, for RIF-resistant M. tb strains, the most common mutations were found in the following order: rpoB S450L probe (355 cases), Ile 491 Phe (35 cases), and L430P (34 cases), with the remaining probes reporting single cases each.
4. Meta-Analysis
A meta-analysis was conducted to ensure transparent, objective, and replicable summaries of the study findings. The eleven included studies provided adequate information for statistical analysis. The results are shown in Figure 2, illustrating the variability in the prevalence of positive cases and resistance to RIF and NIH, as well as gene mutations, within the population investigated. The meta-analysis used the Q test (Cochran’s Q = 263.3585 [df = 10], p < 0.0001), revealing a significant outcome. Furthermore, the overall heterogeneity test yielded a heterogeneity measure (I2) value of 99.84% (p < 0.0001), indicating a highly significant level of heterogeneity in the findings.
As shown in Figure 2, odds ratios were measured for the included studies to investigate the association between the prevalence of positive cases and resistance to Rifampicin (RIF) and Isoniazid (NIH), along with gene mutations, within the population under investigation. The analysis of TB patients in relation to resistance and mutations demonstrated a significant association within the studied population.
The analysis of aggregated data in the study reveals strong and statistically significant positive associations, as shown in Figure 2. These findings are valuable as they enhance the current scientific knowledge in this specific area. The study results have important implications for future research, clinical practice, and the development of interventions related to the studied outcomes. Specifically, the findings suggest a significant relationship between the prevalence of positive cases and the presence of resistance to RIF and NIH, along with gene mutations, among TB patients in the examined population. Understanding these interrelationships is crucial for guiding further research and informing strategies for managing and treating tuberculosis effectively.
The level of heterogeneity among the studies included in the meta-analysis suggests significant variations in results and methodologies. These differences may arise from variations in study populations, data collection methods, or study designs. Consequently, interpreting the overall results requires caution, and further investigation into the sources of heterogeneity is warranted to enhance the robustness and applicability of the findings.
5. Discussion
The emergence of drug-resistant bacilli poses a significant challenge to global TB control and prevention efforts. The utilization of molecular-based diagnostic methods, which involve the detection of mutations in specific genes associated with anti-TB drug resistance, is recognized as a more efficient and effective approach.
The detection of gene mutations in resistance-determining regions within resistant M. tb isolates plays a crucial role in the rapid identification of anti-TB drug resistance. This approach not only assists in the timely detection of resistance but also facilitates the exploration of resistance mechanisms, thereby aiding in the development of effective strategies to combat drug-resistant tuberculosis. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) is crucial for the development of improved diagnostic tools. Further investigation is warranted to identify specific gene mutations that contribute to drug-resistant M. tb, particularly multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Such research will provide valuable insights for local tuberculosis (TB) control efforts and inform the development of effective strategies to combat MDR-TB within the country [16].
The meta-analysis aimed to provide transparent, objective, and reproducible summaries of study outcomes related to the association between the prevalence of positive tuberculosis (TB) cases and resistance to Rifampicin (RIF) and Isoniazid (NIH), along with gene mutations. Odds ratios were used as the measure to assess the strength of this association. The study revealed significant heterogeneity among the included studies, indicating variations in results and methodologies, possibly due to differences in study populations, data collection methods, or study designs.
The analysis demonstrated a notable positive association between TB cases and resistance to RIF and NIH, along with gene mutations, within the studied population. The findings have important implications for future research and clinical practice in managing and treating tuberculosis effectively. However, caution is advised in interpreting the overall results due to the observed heterogeneity, and further investigation into its sources is needed to enhance the reliability and applicability of the findings as a limitation of the review.
In this review, we assessed the prevalence of mutations in genes associated with RIF- and INH-resistant M. tb in South Africa. Our review demonstrated a prevalence of 885 (2%) katG, 2457 (5%) inhA, and 404 (1%) katG + inhA mutations in patients with TB in South Africa. The majority of the mutations were due to rpoB: L430P 34 (8%), S450L 355 (80%), and Ile 491 Phe 35 (8%). Other mutations were in the katG S315T 502 (99%) gene. The mutations occurred at different positions within the rpoB gene and resulted in alterations to the structure or function of the RNA polymerase enzyme. These changes interfere with the binding of RIF to the enzyme, rendering the drug less effective in inhibiting bacterial growth. In the katG gene mutations, S315T lead to reduced activation of INH, reducing the drug’s effectiveness in killing Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
In accordance with our findings, a previous systematic review conducted in Ethiopia corroborated our observations, revealing that S315T mutations in the katG gene accounted for 79.1% of INH resistance in M. tb isolates [17]. Consistent with this, a study conducted in India, which bears the highest burden of TB and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) globally, reported that among the tested isolates, 71.0% exhibited detectable mutations in the katG 315 region, while 29.0% exhibited mutations in the inhA promoter region [18]. A similar study conducted in Ethiopia reported a pooled prevalence of 63.2% for the katG MUT1 (S315T1) mutation [18]. Unfortunately, very little evidence from African studies supports these findings. A study conducted in Uganda demonstrated that katG and inhA gene mutations were primarily attributed to S315T (76%) and C15T (8%) nucleotide changes, respectively [19]. A recent study conducted in Monrovia, Liberia, indicated suggestively higher estimated global frequencies of katG 315 and inhA-15 at 86% and 34%, respectively [20]. It is estimated that approximately 64% of phenotypic resistance to INH globally can be attributed to the katG (S315T) mutation [21]. In the case of RIF resistant isolates, our study revealed that the most prevalent gene mutation associated with RIF resistance was observed at S450L 355 (80%). A study conducted in 2021 also reported that mutations in the rpoB S450L region were associated with high levels of resistance [22].
The origin of development of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) and the transmission, whether direct or by other means, especially in developing countries, are triggered by factors such as immune-compromised HIV individuals, poor living conditions, poor sanitation and acceptable hygiene, poor healthcare administration (diagnostic tools and delaying drug susceptibility testing (DST) practices), inadequate administration of anti-TB therapy regimens and patient compliance, high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, and smoking [23,24,25]. Seid et al. [26] reported that the choice of GenoType MTBDRplus, MTBDRsl LPAs, and WGS as diagnostic techniques have proven to be efficient in the detection of specific genes that are responsible for triggering mutation by anti-TB drug resistance by reducing the timeframe in a matter of hours, instead of weeks or months as is traditionally known across the globe. The prevalence of anti-TB drug resistance among all diagnosed TB patients was 3637 (7%), while the prevalence of any RIF and INH resistance was 3460 (7%) and 2995 (6%), respectively [Table 1] in the study. Eddabra and Neffa [24] further stated that RIF resistance is prone to the mutations on the rpoB gene, especially in an 81 base pair region, and INH resistance frequently occurs on the katG gene. The variance of anti-TB resistance differs depending on geographical location and economic status of the populations of the country. This was further confirmed by the studies from the provinces of Western Cape and KZN of South Africa. In the study, a total of 2995 (6%) 1512 Mtb strains with any INH resistance were identified using standard WHO-approved molecular diagnostic methods, among which a higher proportion of mutations was detected in the katG gene 885 (2%), compared with the inhA promoter region 2457 (5%), according to Table 1. In RIF-resistant M. tb strains, the most common mutations were found in the following order: rpoB S450L probe (355 cases), Ile 491 Phe (35), and L430P (34 cases), with the remaining probes reporting single cases each. In a review by Seid et al. [26], it was reported that most of the mutations were found in codons 531 (34.01%), 526 (9.3%), and 516 (2.33%) in the RIF resistance-determining region (RRDR) of the rpoB gene, and those related to RIF-resistance were in codon 531, followed by 526, mutations. These findings were not far from the findings of this study as the codon’s points were not far apart. This slight variation is due to geographical location, health status of the populace, and the general economic status of the populations of the country. Biologically, this genetic variation occurs when there is a single base substitution with majority of common mutation in the rpoB gene encoding β-subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase at codon 531 (S531L) [24]. In studies by Isakova et al. [27], Minh et al. [28], and Adikaram et al. [29] in Vietnam and Sri Lanka, respectively, over 95% and 30% exhibited mutations in the rpoB gene at codon 531 by RIF-resistant strains, respectively. In this study a higher proportion of mutations was detected in the katG gene, with 885 (2%), compared with the inhA promoter region, with 2457 (5%), as seen in Table 1. However, Seifert et al. [21] reported that there were over 300 (64%) mutations occurring in the katG and inhA genes in a promoter region of inhA. Seifert et al. [21] further opined that a majority of 315 mutations (64%) in the katG gene and 15 mutations in the inhA gene is the dominant (19%) mutation at the inhA promoter region, which was higher in relation to this study, where mutation on the same region was less than 2%. This frequency of mutation trends was at the rpoB, katG, and inhA genes in MDR-TB, which was like other studies carried out globally in countries such as Vietnam, Ethiopia, and Sri Lanka, among others [26,28].
6. Conclusions
The emergence of MDR-TB presents a significant global challenge to TB control and prevention efforts. To address this, molecular-based diagnostic methods that detect specific gene mutations associated with anti-TB drug resistance have been recognized as more efficient and effective approaches. The review was conducted to assess the prevalence of gene mutations related to resistance against RIF and INH in M. tb isolates. The study found that the most prevalent mutations in the rpoB gene were S450L (80%), Ile 491 Phe (8%), and L430P (8%), which result in structural or functional alterations in the RNA polymerase enzyme. These changes interfere with the binding of RIF to the enzyme, reducing its effectiveness in inhibiting bacterial growth. In the katG gene, the predominant mutations were S315T (99%), leading to decreased activation of INH and compromising its efficacy in killing M. tb. These findings are consistent with previous studies conducted in Ethiopia, India, Uganda, and Liberia, which also reported high prevalence of the S315T mutation in the katG gene and mutations in the rpoB gene associated with rifampicin resistance. This review contributed to the understanding of drug resistance mechanisms and provided valuable insights for the development of targeted interventions against drug-resistant TB.
Understanding the molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is of paramount importance for further developing improved diagnostic tools and effective strategies to combat MDR-TB. Further research is necessary to identify specific gene mutations that contribute to MDR-TB and to inform the development of tailored interventions.
Author Contributions
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, original draft preparation, reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Research reported in this article was supported by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) through its Division of Research Capacity Development under the Research Capacity Development Initiative from funding received from the South African National Treasury. The content and findings reported/illustrated are the sole deduction, view and responsibility of the researcher and do not reflect the official position and sentiments of the SAMRC.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the University of Venda and the SAMRC for the works conducted in collaboration.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- World Health Organization (WHO). Global Tuberculosis Report 2020; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131 (accessed on 16 April 2021).
- World Health Organization (WHO). Global Tuberculosis Report 2019; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565714 (accessed on 16 April 2021).
- Abebe, G.; Paasch, F.; Apers, L.; Rigouts, L.; Colebunders, R. Tuberculosis drug resistance testing by molecular methods: Opportunities and challenges in resource-limited settings. J. Microbiol. Methods 2022, 84, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cox, H.; Goig, G.A.; Salaam-Dreyer, Z.; Dippenaar, A.; Reuter, A.; Mohr-Holland, E.; Daniels, J.; Cudahy, P.G.; Nicol, M.P.; Borrell, S.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing has the potential to improve treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in high-burden settings: A retrospective cohort study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2022, 60, e0236221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oostvogels, S.; Ley, S.D.; Heupink, T.H.; Dippenaar, A.; Streicher, E.M.; De Vos, E.; Meehan, C.J.; Dheda, K.; Warren, R.; Van Rie, A. Transmission, distribution and drug resistance-conferring mutations of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Microb. Genom. 2022, 8, 000815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laurenzo, D.; Mousa, S.A. Mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and current status of rapid molecular diagnostic testing. Acta Trop. 2011, 119, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Vos, M.; Derendinger, B.; Dolby, T.; Simpson, J.; van Helden, P.D.; Rice, J.E.; Wangh, L.J.; Theron, G.; Warren, R.M. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of FluoroType MTBDR, a new molecular assay for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e00531-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rockwood, N.; Sirgel, F.; Streicher, E.; Warren, R.; Meintjes, G.; Wilkinson, R.J. Low frequency of acquired isoniazid and rifampicin resistance in rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis in a setting of high HIV-1 infection and tuberculosis coprevalence. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shah, M.; Paradis, S.; Betz, J.; Beylis, N.; Bharadwaj, R.; Caceres, T.; Gotuzzo, E.; Joloba, M.; Mave, V.; Nakiyingi, L.; et al. Multicenter study of the accuracy of the BD MAX multidrug-resistant tuberculosis assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and mutations associated with resistance to rifampin and isoniazid. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 1161–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, T.S.; Challagundla, L.; Baugh, E.H.; Omar, S.V.; Mustaev, A.; Auld, S.C.; Shah, N.S.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Brust, J.C.; Nelson, K.N.; et al. Pre-detection history of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 23284–23291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Loiseau, C.; Brites, D.; Reinhard, M.; Zürcher, K.; Borrell, S.; Ballif, M.; Fenner, L.; Cox, H.; Rutaihwa, L.K.; Wilkinson, R.J.; et al. HIV coinfection is associated with low-fitness rpoB variants in rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00782-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salaam-Dreyer, Z.; Streicher, E.M.; Sirgel, F.A.; Menardo, F.; Borrell, S.; Reinhard, M.; Doetsch, A.; Cudahy, P.G.; Mohr-Holland, E.; Daniels, J.; et al. Rifampicin-monoresistant tuberculosis is not the same as multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A descriptive study from Khayelitsha, South Africa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemoth. 2021, 65, e0036421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitso, L.; Potgieter, S.; Van der Spoel van Dijk, A. Prevalence of isoniazid resistance-conferring mutations associated with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Free State Province, South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 2019, 109, 659–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Maningi, N.E.; Daum, L.T.; Rodriguez, J.D.; Said, H.M.; Peters, R.P.; Sekyere, J.O.; Fischer, G.W.; Chambers, J.P.; Fourie, P.B. Multi-and extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in South Africa: A molecular analysis of historical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01214-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Makhado, N.A.; Matabane, E.; Faccin, M.; Pinçon, C.; Jouet, A.; Boutachkourt, F.; Goeminne, L.; Gaudin, C.; Maphalala, G.; Beckert, P.; et al. Outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa undetected by WHO-endorsed commercial tests: An observational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marahatta, S.B.; Gautam, S.; Dhital, S.; Pote, N.; Jha, A.K.; Mahato, R.; Mishra, S.; Poudel, B.H.; Ramasoota, P.; Kaewkungwal, J.; et al. katG (SER 315 THR) gene mutation in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Kathmandu Univ. Med. J. 2011, 9, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sekyere, J.; Reta, M.A.; Maningi, N.E.; Fourie, P.B. Antibiotic resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in Africa: A systematic review of cur- rent reports of molecular epidemiology, mechanisms and diagnostics. J. Infect. 2019, 79, 550–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alagappan, C.; Shivekar, S.S.; Brammacharry, U.; Kapalamurthy, V.R.C.; Sakkaravarthy, A.; Subashkumar, R.; Muthaiah, M. Prevalence of mutations in genes as- sociated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from re-treated smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients: A meta-analysis. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Res. 2018, 14, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kigozi, E.; Kasule, G.W.; Musisi, K.; Lukoye, D.; Kyobe, S.; Katabazi, F.A.; Wampande, E.M.; Joloba, M.L.; Kateete, D.P. Prevalence and patterns of rifampicin and isoniazid resistance-conferring mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Uganda. PLoS ONE 2015, 13, e0198091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rodwell, T.C.; Valafar, F.; Douglas, J.; Qian, L.; Garfein, R.S.; Chawla, A.; Torres, J.; Zadorozhny, V.; Kim, M.S.; Hoshide, M.; et al. Predicting extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis phenotypes with genetic mutations. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seifert, M.; Catanzaro, D.; Catanzaro, A.; Rodwell, T.C. Genetic mutations associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rando-Segura, A.; Aznar, M.L.; Moreno, M.M.; Espasa, S.M.; Sulleiro, I.E.; Bocanegra, G.C.; Gil, O.E.; Nindia, E.A.; Escartin, H.C.; Zacarias, A.; et al. Molecular characterization of rpoB gene mutations in isolates from tuberculosis patients in Cubal, Republic of Angola. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saravanan, M.; Niguse, S.; Abdulkader, M.; Tsegay, E.; Hailekiros, H.; Gebrekidan, A.; Araya, T.; Pugazhendhi, A. Review on emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR & XDR-TB) and its molecular diagnosis in Ethiopia. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 117, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Eddabra, R.; Neffa, M. Mutations associated with rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Moroccan patients: Systematic review. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2020, 2020, 5185896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reta, M.A.; Alemnew, B.; Abate, B.B.; Fourie, P.B. Prevalence of drug resistance-conferring mutations associated with isoniazid- and rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ethiopia a systematic review and metaanalysis. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 26, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seid, A.; Berhane, N.; Nureddin, S. Frequency of rpoB, katG, and inhA Gene Polymorphisms Associated with Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolates among Ethiopian TB Patients: A Systematic Review. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2022, 2022, 1967675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isakova, J.; Sovkhozova, N.; Vinnikov, D.; Goncharova, Z.; Talaibekova, E.; Aldasheva, N.; Aldashev, A. Mutations of rpoB, katG, inhA and ahp genes in rifampicin and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Kyrgyz Republic. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Minh, N.N.; Van Bac, N.; Son, N.T.; Lien, V.T.K.; Ha, C.H.; Cuong, N.H.; Mai, C.T.N.; Le, T.H. Molecular characteristics of rifampicin-and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Vietnam. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 598–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adikaram, C.P.; Perera, J.; Wijesundera, S.S. Geographical profile of rpoB gene mutations in rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Sri Lanka. Microbiol. Drug Res. 2012, 18, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the literature search strategy, search results, and inclusion and exclusion of articles.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the literature search strategy, search results, and inclusion and exclusion of articles.
Figure 2.
Forest plot showing heterogeneity among studies investigating gene mutations in SA [4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Table 1.
Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review.
| Author(s) | Study Region | Study Period | Type of patients (EXTRA or PTB) | Study design | Molecular Diagnostic Method(s) | Participants (n) | All Positive Cases (n) | Total Isolates with DST Performed (n) | Any Drug Resistance (n) | Any INH or RIF Resistance (n) | MDR-TB (n) | Anti-TB Drug Resistance or Mechanisms rpoB and KatG (n) | Frequency of Gene Mutations (n) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INH | RIF | katG | inhA | katG + inhA | rpoB + katG | ||||||||||||
| Western cape (capetown) | 2018 | PTB | - | Flouro Type MTBDR and MTBDRplus | 448/51,623 (0.9%) | 244/43,580 (0.5%) | 448/650 (69%) | - | 13/2995 (0.4%) | 35/3460 (1%) | 163/2909 (5.6%) | rpoB: L511P (1), D516V (1), H526L (1), H526N (1) and L533P (1) | - | - | - | - |
| Western cape (Khayelitsha) | March 2013–2014 | PTB | Prospective cohort study | GeneXpert MTB/RIF | 306/51,623 (0.6%) | 306/43,580 (1%) | - | - | 17/2995 (0.5%) | - | rpoB: S531L (2) KatG: S315T (2) | - | 13/2457 (0.5%) | - | - | |
| Western cape (Khayelitsha) | 2008–2017 | Extra | Retrospective Cohort Study | Whole-genome sequencing (Illumina HiSeq 2500) | 1274/51,623 (2.5%) | 1274/43,580 (3%) | - | - | 196/2995 (6.5%) | - | 12/2909 (0.4%) | - | - | - | 196/404 (48.5%) | - |
| Western cape | 2006–2017 | PTB | Prospective study | MTBDRplus line probe assay Xpert MTB/RIF | 748/51,623 (1.4%) | 461/43,580 (1%) | - | 461/3637 (12.7%) | 461/2995 (15%) | 461/3460 (12%) | 197/2909 (7%) | - | - | - | - | - |
| Cape-town, Pune, Kampala, Lima | 2017–2018 | PTB | Prospective/multicenter study | Xpert MTB/RIF BD MAX MDR-TB assay | 1053/5,1623 (1%) | 984/43,580 (2.2%) | 202/650 (31%) | 232/3637 (6.4%) | 27/2995 (1%) | 10/3460 (0.3%) | - | D435Y (2), D435F (1), L430P (2), L452P (1) | 16/885 (2%) | 4/2457 (0.2%) | - | - |
| KZN (uMkhanyakude district, Ugu and Uthukela district) | 2011–2014 | PTB | Prospective study | Whole-genome sequencing | 404/51,623 (1%) | 318/43,580 (1%) | - | 318/3637 (8.7%) | 54/2995 (2%) | 54/2909 (2%) | KatG: S315T (1) | - | - | - | - | |
| Peru (Lima), Thailand (Bangkok), South Africa (Cape-Town), Kenya (Eldoret), Côte d’Ivoire (Abidjan), Botswana, DRC, Nigeria (Abuja), Tanzania (Bagamoyo) | - | PTB | Multicenter study | Whole-genome sequencing | 312/51,623 (1%) | 312/43,580 (1%) | - | 312/3637 (8.6%) | 276/2995 (9%) | 282/3460 (8%) | 246/2909 (8%) | rpoB S450L (282) KatG: S315T (250) | 282/885 (32%) | 276/2457 (11%) | - | - |
| Cape town | 2008–2017 | PTB | Descriptive study | Xpert MTB/RIF | 2161/51,623 (4%) | 1119/43,580 (2.5%) | - | 1119/3637 (31%) | 2041/3460 (59% | 899/2909 (31%) | rpoB L430P (32), rpoB S450L (73) | - | 2041/2457 (83%) | - | - | |
| Free state (Fezile- Dabi, Lejweleputswa, Mangaung, Thabo Mofutsanyana, Xhariep) | 2014–2016 | PTB | Retrospective study | GenoType MTBDRplus | 6648/51,623 (13%) | 918/43,580 (2%) | - | 918/3637 (25.2%) | 123/2995 (4%) | 587/3460 (17%) | 918/2909 (31%) | - | 587/885 (66%) | 123/2457 (5%) | 208/404 (51%) | - |
| Western cape and Gauteng | 1993–1995 | - | - | Hain line probe assay (LPA) Illumina Miseq whole-genome sequencing (WGS) GenoType version 2 MTBDRplus assay (Hain Lifescience, Germany). | 625/51,623 (1.2%) | - | 5/2995 (0.2%) | 44/3460 (1.3%) | 171/2909 (6%) | rpoB (Thr480Ala (1), Gln253Arg (1), Val249Met (1), Val251Tyr (1), Val251Phe (2) KatG: (Trp477STOP (1), Gln88STOP (1), Trp198STOP (1), Trp412STOP (1) | - | - | - | - | ||
| Gauteng, Mpumalanga, North west and Limpopo | 2013–2016 | - | Multiplex allele-specific PCR Deeplex-MycTB Whole-genome sequencing (Sanger sequencing) | 37,644/51,623 (73%) | 37,644/43,580 (86%) | 277/3637 (7.6%) | 1823/2995 (61%) | - | 249/2909 (8%) | rpoB; IIe491phe (35) KatG: S315T (249) | - | - | - | - | ||
| Total | - | - | - | - | - | 51,623/51,623 (100%) | 43,580/51,623 (84%) | 650/51,623 (1.2%) | 3637/51,623 (7%) | 2995/51,623 (6%) | 3460/51,623 (7%) | 2909/51,623 (6%) | rpoB: L511P (1), L533P (1), L430P (34)L452P (1), D516(1), D435Y (2), D435P (1), H526L (1), H526N (1), S531L (2), S450L (355), Thr480Ala (1), Gln 253 Arg (1), Val 249 Met (1), Val 251 Tyr (1), Val 251Phe (2), Ile 491 Phe (35) Total rpoB (441) KatG: S315T (502), Trp477STOP (1), Gln88STOP (1), Trp198STOP (1), Trp412STOP (1) Total KatG (506) | 885/51,623 (2%) | 2457/51,623 (5%) | 404/51,623 (1%) | 0 |
EXTRA = extrapulmonary tuberculosis; PTB = pulmonary tuberculosis; INH = isoniazid; RIF = Rifampicin; WT = wild-type; rpoB, KatG, inHA, KatG + inhA, rpoB + katG = gene mutation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Traoré, A.N.; Rikhotso, M.C.; Mphaphuli, M.A.; Patel, S.M.; Mahamud, H.A.; Kachienga, L.O.; Kabue, J.-P.; Potgieter, N. Isoniazid and Rifampicin Resistance-Conferring Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from South Africa. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081015
AMA Style
Traoré AN, Rikhotso MC, Mphaphuli MA, Patel SM, Mahamud HA, Kachienga LO, Kabue J-P, Potgieter N. Isoniazid and Rifampicin Resistance-Conferring Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from South Africa. Pathogens. 2023; 12(8):1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081015
Chicago/Turabian StyleTraoré, Afsatou Ndama, Mpumelelo Casper Rikhotso, Marry Avheani Mphaphuli, Sana Mustakahmed Patel, Hafsa Ali Mahamud, Leonard Owino Kachienga, Jean-Pierre Kabue, and Natasha Potgieter. 2023. "Isoniazid and Rifampicin Resistance-Conferring Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from South Africa" Pathogens 12, no. 8: 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081015
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
