Next Article in Journal
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by In Situ Hybridization in Lung-Cancer Cells Metastatic to Brain and in Adjacent Brain Parenchyma
Next Article in Special Issue
Interaction of Human Behavioral Factors Shapes the Transmission of Arboviruses by Aedes and Culex Mosquitoes
Previous Article in Journal
Onco-Pathogen Mediated Cancer Progression and Associated Signaling Pathways in Cancer Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

PICTUREE—Aedes: A Web Application for Dengue Data Visualization and Case Prediction

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
2
National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Biocomplexity Institute and Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22911, USA.
Pathogens 2023, 12(6), 771; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060771
Submission received: 21 April 2023 / Revised: 18 May 2023 / Accepted: 19 May 2023 / Published: 29 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Vector-Borne Diseases in a Changing World)

Abstract

:
Dengue fever remains a significant public health concern in many tropical and subtropical countries, and there is still a need for a system that can effectively combine global risk assessment with timely incidence forecasting. This research describes an integrated application called PICTUREE—Aedes, which can collect and analyze dengue-related data, display simulation results, and forecast outbreak incidence. PICTUREE—Aedes automatically updates global temperature and precipitation data and contains historical records of dengue incidence (1960–2012) and Aedes mosquito occurrences (1960–2014) in its database. The application utilizes a mosquito population model to estimate mosquito abundance, dengue reproduction number, and dengue risk. To predict future dengue outbreak incidence, PICTUREE—Aedes applies various forecasting techniques, including the ensemble Kalman filter, recurrent neural network, particle filter, and super ensemble forecast, which are all based on user-entered case data. The PICTUREE—Aedes’ risk estimation identifies favorable conditions for potential dengue outbreaks, and its forecasting accuracy is validated by available outbreak data from Cambodia.

1. Introduction

The PICTUREE—Aedes web application is an innovative system that integrates tools for displaying dengue-related data, visualizing simulated results, and forecasting future cases for an ongoing outbreak. This application is a product of the Predicting Insect Contact and Transmission Using histoRical Entomological and Environmental data (PICTUREE) project, which was initiated in 2019.
Dengue fever is an Aedes mosquito-borne viral infection that threatens the health of over 3 billion people in numerous tropical and subtropical regions [1]. Aedes aegypti mosquito is the primary carrier of dengue viruses, with the ability to bite multiple individuals in a brief period, and its immature phase can be found in water containers near human dwellings [2]. The proliferation, biting rates, infective rate, and survivability rate of Aedes mosquitoes are substantially affected by climatic conditions such as rainfall, temperature, and relative humidity, which, in turn, have a significant impact on the spread of the dengue virus [3,4,5]. The breeding time and maturity period of Aedes mosquitoes are shortened due to global warming, resulting in the accelerated growth of the vector population [6]. Furthermore, increasing human mobility and high population density have facilitated the geographical spread of dengue viruses over long distances [7]. Therefore, an integrated system is needed to aggregate collected data, analyze them, estimate parameters, and forecast future risks and incidence to proactively combat the spread of the virus.
Numerous research studies have been conducted to identify and quantify the temperature-dependent variables that impact the life cycle of the mosquito vector, due to the susceptibility of the mosquito’s life cycle to temperature [8,9,10,11]. Mathematical equations can be used to model the dynamics of the mosquito population and to estimate the parameters such as mortality, transition rate, and oviposition rate at different temperatures [5]. Another dengue transmission model, which took into account various temperatures, survival rates, between-bite intervals, and extrinsic incubation periods, discovered that an increase in mosquito longevity and temperature led to an augmentation in dengue transmission [12].
There has been an increasing number of approaches to predicting the incidence of infectious diseases, including the use of statistical models [13,14], state-space compartmental models [15,16,17,18], deep learning methods [19,20,21], etc. The state-space models coupled with data assimilation algorithms can generate real-time forecasts and estimate key parameters. The estimated model parameters can then be utilized to determine the basic reproduction number of the disease, the carrying capacity of the vector population, and other relevant metrics. A state-space compartmental disease model combined with an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) was employed to estimate and predict future dengue incidence, infection rates, and mosquito emergence rates in [16]. Deep learning approaches, especially the long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network, are also widely used to generate reliable epidemic forecasts [21]. Machine learning approaches have the advantage of being able to handle nonlinearity and complex data structures. Another emerging technique is the ensemble forecast that enhances the forecasting accuracy of individual models [22,23]. A superensemble forecast was developed by combining three models—susceptible, infectious, recovered, ensemble adjustment Kalman filter, Bayesian weighted outbreaks, and historical likelihood—using the weighted average method [23]. The superensemble was used to predict dengue cases in San Juan, and it was found to provide more accurate forecasts compared to individual models. The use of ensemble forecasts, which combine multiple forecasting models or techniques, can help reduce errors and biases that may be present in individual forecasts.
The PICTUREE—Aedes web application aggregates dengue-related data from multiple sources, including global daily temperature, global daily precipitation, Aedes mosquito occurrence, and dengue case occurrence. These data are stored in an SQL database and can be readily visualized through user-friendly displays. The PICTUREE—Aedes web application also provides estimations of the Aedes mosquito population, the dengue transmission reproduction number R t , and the dengue risk globally, which can be viewed by users in both space and time. Furthermore, the application employs several algorithms, including the ensemble Kalman filter, the recurrent neural network, the particle filter, and the super ensemble, to forecast dengue cases for an ongoing outbreak. To generate forecasts, users must provide information about the cumulative reported cases in recent weeks, the outbreak location, and the local population size. After processing this data, the application outputs the statistics of the three-week forecasted cases.

2. Data

Table 1 presents a comprehensive list of the data sources. The daily global temperature and precipitation data are obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather stations [24]. The ERA5 hourly data provide hourly estimates of atmospheric variables, such as temperature, pressure, and humidity, which are used for simulation purposes [25]. The terrestrial ecoregions data are utilized to select areas with similar climate conditions [26,27,28]. The Aedes mosquito occurrence dataset and dengue occurrence dataset are geo-positioned occurrence records spanning from 1960 to 2012 [29,30]. Country-wise Google trend data for the keywords “dengue” and “fever” are also collected. The aforementioned data are either directly displayed on the map or are used for the simulations and forecasts [31].

3. Simulation Tools

The PICTUREE-Aedes simulations consist of two primary components: (1) the estimations of dengue risk-related measures and (2) the forecasts of case number for an ongoing outbreak. The tools graphically represent current and future risk of dengue transmission for users based on the life history of the mosquito vector.

3.1. Estimating Dengue Risk-Related Measures

We developed a dengue transmission risk model by training a neural network classifier over historical dengue outbreak data. The model uses the estimated vector population and the Dengue transmission reproductive number as predictive variables. In order to estimate the vector population and reproductive number, we developed a mechanistic model to simulate the Ae. aegypti population. The mechanistic model incorporates the mosquito’s temperature-dependent parameters in a system of integral equations to calculate the mosquito population at various stages of development, including immature and adult stages. A diagram of the mechanistic model is shown in Figure 1. The set of integral equations precisely considers the temperature-dependent development time required for mosquitoes to transform from an egg into adult form. Given that the development period tends to be longer in seasons with cooler temperatures, such precise calculation is especially crucial in estimating the mosquito population in areas that experience significant temperature fluctuations throughout the year.

3.1.1. Vector Population

To accurately simulate the mosquito population fluctuations, the model accounts for the time spent in each life history stage during the aquatic or immature portion of the mosquito life cycle, as shown in Figure 1. The development rates of these stages are temperature-dependent, with warmer temperatures resulting in faster development. The temperature-dependent rates were determined from experimental data [5,8,10]. In addition to temperature, the effect of precipitation on the mosquito population is increased through the carrying capacity of the location: more rainfall equates to greater availability of habitats or more containers filled with water. Alternatively, less rainfall in some urban areas results in more irrigation or water storage, leading to an increase in filled containers, but this is location dependent. The equations that describe the life cycle of the mosquitoes are non-Markovian, meaning that transition times to new stages in the cycle are not exponential random variables. The transition to a new stage happens when the development of a current stage is complete. Moreover, the development rates are strongly temperature-dependent, and temperature changes throughout the year. Therefore, we use integral equations to describe the life cycle of the mosquitoes accurately.
In order to estimate the impact of precipitation on carrying capacity, the life cycle equations are extended to account for virus transmission and to subsequently fit the model to various dengue outbreak data from around the world using particle filter smoothing. This enables us to indirectly estimate the carrying capacity and its variation with precipitation. For this process, we used 67 dengue epidemic curves from Brazil, Mexico [32], Malaysia [33], Pakistan [34], Philippines [35], Singapore [36], Taiwan [16], Sri Lanka [37], Costa Rica [38] and Vietnam [39]. Particle filtering is an estimation technique known as sequential Monte Carlo, which involves iteratively updating the estimated parameters using a sequence of observation. We used a number of new cases as observations, and the carrying capacity is the unknown parameter that is sequentially estimated.
The local mosquito populations are calculated using the life cycle equations, daily average temperature, and precipitation for each location around the globe with longitude and latitude resolutions of 0.25 degrees. The result is the time-dependent profile of the mosquito population. The calculated values are not the exact populations, rather they reflect the variation of the mosquito population in that location through time.

3.1.2. Dengue Transmission Reproductive Number

The value of dengue’s basic reproductive number R 0
R 0 = V N H α 2 ϕ H V ϕ V H γ V μ V σ H ( μ V + γ V )
depends on the ratio of mosquito to human population V / N H , mosquito biting rate α , human-to-vector and vector-to-human transmission probabilities per infectious bite ϕ H V , ϕ V H , extrinsic incubation period in the mosquito γ V , mosquito mortality rate μ V , and infectious period of human σ H . These parameters are temperature-dependent and can be found in [40], except for V / N H . The R 0 is derived assuming constant temperature and using Markovian equations. When R 0 < 1 , the viral transmission will result in fewer new cases than past cases, and the infection will burn out if maintained for sufficient time. Conversely, interpretation that the infection is going to die out when R 0 < 1 is only relevant if this condition is satisfied for a long period. However, if the temperature is almost constant for a period longer than the relevant periods in the transmission model, the R 0 can be used to quantify the severity of virus transmission. In other words, when R 0 > 1 , an infected individual is expected to generate more infection in the population. For this reason, we utilize the value of R 0 to gauge the severity of virus transmission. The mosquito-to-human population ratio V / N H is time-dependent and is affected by the carrying capacity of the environment. To estimate the carrying capacity per human, we fit the transmission model to epidemic dengue curves from different locations around the world with a given human population. For each location, we obtain a constant component for the carrying capacity and a parameter that determines the variation of the carrying capacity with precipitation. We use the distribution of these parameters to find a statistical model for the carrying capacity per human. Although this model may not give the exact value for the carrying capacity, we use it as an approximate input in the calculation of R 0 . Our calculation shows that R 0 is almost proportional to the carrying capacity; therefore, the calculated R 0 provides a good approximation for the time-dependent profile of the exact reproductive number. Higher R 0 values indicate greater dengue virus transmission in an area; therefore, users can quickly understand where control measures need to be initiated and evaluate if they are working by observing changes in R 0 .

3.1.3. Dengue Transmission Risk

To estimate dengue transmission risk, we use the dengue transmission reproductive number and vector population calculated using the mechanistic model as predictive variables. For each location, we calculate the one-week moving average of the variables and apply them in a trained neural network classifier to obtain a time-dependent transmission risk. Assuming the historical presence of the mosquitoes and the virus, the risk factor is a value between zero and one corresponding to the least and the most favorable environmental condition, respectively, for dengue transmission. To train the model, we used dengue epidemic data from Brazil, Mexico, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Costa Rica and Vietnam. For each one of the epidemic curves, we manually tagged periods of high and low transmission. If the number of new cases is small and comparable to the baseline for the location, we tag that period as zero, otherwise as one. In addition, we calculate the corresponding predictive variable as described above for each location and period. Using the tag values as the target variable and the corresponding predictive variables, we train the neural network classifier for risk evaluation.
In Figure 2, we show the data used for training as green and yellow dots, indicating low (0) and high (1) transmission, respectively. The neural network classifier is a nonlinear model that assigns a risk value between zero and one to points on the surface defined by the predictive variables V / N h and R 0 . Within the depicted image, regions displaying risk values exceeding 0.5 are indicated by the color red, while those with values below 0.5 are represented by the color blue.

3.2. Forecasting Dengue Case Number

In this section, we outline the methodology we have developed for predicting the future incidence of ongoing dengue outbreaks. Our approach entails analyzing user-provided data, including reported incidence, location, and date, and extracting pertinent environmental information from our extensive database. These data are then utilized to generate forecasts, which are presented by the statistics including upper quantile, median, and lower quantile values of the forecast distribution. Case forecasts help PICTUREE–Aedes users understand how the dengue outbreak will change with time. Forecasts of increasing cases suggest that allocating addition resources to an area is needed due to continued transmission, whereas decreasing case forecasts suggest that resources can be reallocated and that the outbreak is getting smaller.

3.2.1. SEIR-SEI-EnKF Forecast

The SEIR-SEI-EnKF forecasts are generated by employing the disease transition model SEIR-SEI combined with the EnKF data-assimilation technique. The SEIR-SEI-EnKF model is a new approach for estimating and forecasting dengue outbreak dynamics, which has been detailed in [16]. The SEIR-SEI model is a compartmental model that describes the transmission of the dengue virus between the host and vector population groups. This model considers the compartments for the human population and vector population, such as susceptible ( S H   a n d   S V ), exposed ( E H   a n d   E V ), infectious ( I H   a n d   I V ), and removed ( R H ). Transitions between compartments are described by the following difference equations
X t + 1 = f ( X t ) = S t H + λ H P t H β V H S t H I t V μ H S t H E t H + β V H S t H I t V ( δ H + μ H ) E t H I t H + δ H E t H ( γ H + μ H ) I t H R t H + γ H I t H μ H R t H S t V + λ V P t V β H V S t V I t H μ V S t V E t V + β H V S t V I t H ( δ V + μ V ) E t V I t V + δ V E t V μ V I t V
where X t = [ S t H , E t H , I t H , R t H , S t V , E t V , I t V ] , P , λ , μ , β , δ , a n d   γ represent the population, birth rate, death rate, infection rate, incubation rate, and recovering rate, and upper note H for host species, and V for vector species.
The Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) is a data assimilation technique that can be used to estimate both the states and parameters of a system simultaneously. The EnKF maintains an ensemble of the state variables X t and the time-varying parameters Φ t = [ β V H β H V λ V ] , which can be put together in a matrix A t R 10 × N where N is the number of ensembles
A t = X t 1 X t 2 X t N Φ t 1 Φ t 2 Φ t N .
At each time step, the EnKF first uses the model simulations to predict the prior, which is the expected state of the system
A t + 1 = F ( A t ) = f ( X t ) g ( Φ t ) + q t
where g ( Φ t ) is the difference equation for the parameters, and q t is the model noise. Therefore, the ensemble covariance for the prior is given by
σ t p r i = 1 N 1 ( A t A t ¯ ) ( A t A t ¯ ) ,
where A t ¯ is the mean of ensemble members.
To update the estimated state and parameters of the system, the EnKF assimilates new observations y t into the ensemble Y t ^ = y t + ϵ t , where ϵ t is the perturbation vector. The assimilation step involves comparing the predicted states of the ensemble with the observed data and adjusting the estimated state and parameters of the system to better fit the observations
A t = A t + K t ( Y t ^ H t A t )
where K t = σ t p r i H t ( H t σ t p r i H t + σ t o b s ) 1 is the Kalman gain, and H t is the measurement index matrix, σ t o b s = ϵ t ϵ t N 1 . Finally, the EnKF generates a new ensemble of model simulations by perturbing the updated estimated state and parameters of the system, and the process repeats for the next time step. In summary, the EnKF utilizes a data assimilation approach that combines real-time observations with mathematical models to accurately forecast dengue epidemics, helping to inform proactive measures for disease control and prevention.

3.2.2. Neural Network Forecast

The second approach to predict weekly cases uses a recurrent neural network model, as shown in Figure 3. Assuming that the index of the current week is represented by t, the model uses a sequence of weekly new cases up to t, c t 4 , c t 3 , c t 2 , c t 1 , c t , as input to predict new cases in the next three weeks. In addition to the sequence of new cases, the model uses the vector population and reproductive number sequences, calculated independently using the model discussed in the previous section.
The vector population V t + h 4 , V t + h 3 , V t + h 2 , V t + h 1 , V t + h and reproductive number { R t + h 4 , R t + h 3 , R t + h 2 , R t + h 1 , R t + h } include estimated vector population and reproductive number in the weeks ahead. Since the calculation of these sequences requires temperature as input, we use the average of temperature for the corresponding period in the past years. In addition to the sequences we discussed, we feed the error of the latest two predictions to the neural network model. We train this neural network model using historical dengue epidemic curves from different locations around the world. Although it is possible to train a neural network model that generates one, two, and three weeks of predictions, we choose to train independent models for each one of these prediction horizons. Here, the obtained output is a single value for each prediction time interval.

3.2.3. Particle Filter Forecast

As a third approach, we apply particle filter prediction to the transmission model, as depicted in Figure 4. In the transmission model, we divide the adult female mosquitoes into three compartments based on the virus development in the mosquitoes. We assume that all the newly developed adult mosquitoes are virus-free, (Adult-S). During the gonotrophic period, whose length is temperature-dependent, the mosquitoes may bite an infectious human, acquire the virus, and remain in the adult-exposed (Adult-E) state until they become infectious and are able to transmit the virus. The sojourn time for the Adult-E state is temperature-dependent. After becoming infectious, the mosquitoes infect susceptible humans during blood meals in their gonotrophic cycle until they die. We assume that the number of infecting bites per cycle is constant, and the bites occur uniformly in each cycle period. The human infection rate is A I B / ( C N ) , where A I is the population of infectious mosquitoes, B is the number of infecting bites per gonotrophic cycle, C is the cycle length, and N is the human population. Similarly, the mosquitoes’ infection rate is H I B / ( C N ) , where H I is the infectious human population. In the particle filter estimation, we assume two unknown parameters, which are carrying capacity and the number of infecting bites per gonotrophic cycle. Like the mosquito life cycle model as shown in Figure 1, we account for non-Markovian transitions in the virus transmission model. Particle filtering is a sequential Monte Carlo approach that employs a group of samples to represent the posterior distribution of the unknown parameters. In each step of the process, a weight is assigned to each sample based on the observed data. During the resampling phase, particles with low weights are substituted by new particles in close proximity to the particles with higher weights. An advantage of the particle filter is its ability to handle observations from any probability distribution. In our particle filter estimation, we provide the algorithm with a sequence of weekly new human cases and estimate posterior distributions of new human cases for the one-week up to three-week horizon.

3.2.4. Super Ensemble Forecast

Using the competing forecasts described above, a super-ensemble forecast can be created by applying a weighted average of the individual forecasts. The weights of the three individual forecasting methods is determined based on the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of those forecasts over prior predictions. Specifically, the RMSE of the forecasts made for time t 3 , t 2 , and t 1 can be used to generate the super-ensemble forecast for time T. The RMSE of each individual forecast e i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 ) can be calculated as follows:
e t i = 1 3 τ = t 3 t 1 ( f τ i O τ ) 2 ,
where f t i is the median forecast of method i at time t, and O t is the observation at time t. The weight of method i can be obtained by
w t i = 1 e t i k = 1 3 1 e t k .
The super-ensemble forecast is given by
f t s e = w t 1 f t 1 + w t 2 f t 2 + w t 3 f t 3 .

4. System Architecture

The web application consists of several components as shown in Figure 5, which we broadly categorize into (1) the frontend client application and (2) the server backend.

4.1. Client Application

The web-based client is built on top of HTML and is accessible using any web browser. The application’s graphical interface consists of an interactive map viewer and tools for data selection, filtering, parameter inputs, and submission of on-demand analyses. The map is displayed using the open-source JavaScript library leaflet.js [41]. The application communicates directly with the server backend to load maps, results, and data.

4.2. Server Backend

  • HTTP server: The backend system exposes multiple API (application programming interface) endpoints to the client via an HTTP server. This HTTP server runs in the Node.js environment [42].
  • Database: The database service consists of PostgreSQL and PostGIS [43] extensions to handle spatial queries. The database contains multiple tables to store data collected from various sources and simulation results.
  • Map tile service: When the client requests the home page of the map tool, the HTTP server loads map tiles from a separate map tile service called MapTiler [44]. This service helps with memory management by loading only the parts and zoom levels required by the client. The service takes input from large tile files collected from OpenStreetMap [45].
  • Simulation tools: The system can deploy and run executable code to perform on-demand analysis and simulations on selected data. The HTTP service directly communicates with the executables to pass arguments and to collect results.
  • Scheduled updates: The system contains scripts that run regularly to update the database tables with new weather data. The script connects to the NOAA-NCEI [24] servers for daily weather observation data.

5. Results

5.1. Data Visualization

Figure 6 displays the graphical interface of the map tool, where the 2D projection map of the Earth is centrally located and where users are able to pan and zoom to their areas of interest. The interface’s left side features various tools that assist with data selection and visualization. A comprehensive guide to the description and usage of each tool is available in the PICTUREE–Aedes Users Guide in the Supplementary Material.
The PICTUREE–Aedes enables users to identify weather stations and their recorded data based on their preferences. Figure 7a illustrates the distribution of weather stations in Central Indochina (Ecoregion). Users can select a station and plot its precipitation and temperature data. Figure 7b demonstrates the daily temperature and precipitation data of station UBON RATCHATHANI throughout 2022.
Figure 8 presents the occurrence records of dengue, Aedes aegypti, and Aedes albopictus, marked, respectively, with red, blue, and purple dots in Central Indochina. Clicking on a dot will generate a popup that displays the country name and the year of occurrence.
Additionally, the PICTUREE–Aedes supports the display of information on Google Trends. Figure 9 illustrates the trend of “dengue” and “fever” in Cambodia during January 2018.

5.2. Simulation Results

The PICTUREE–Aedes offers four types of mosquito simulation results, including daily average temperature, vector host ratio, reproduction number, and dengue risk, which can be visualized spatially and temporally. To view the data spatially, users must select a specific day, and a heat map of the selected area will display the selected data value. Figure 10 displays the average temperature (a), dengue transmission reproduction number (b), vector–host ratio (c), and dengue transmission risk (d) of the Indochina peninsula on 15 September 2022. Visualizing data beyond the next six months from the current time is limited.
To visualize data temporally, users must select a location and a time range. Figure 11 displays mosquito simulation data from 1 January to 11 June 2022 at the user-specified location. Please note that the query time frame is limited to a six-month horizon from the current date.
The PICTUREE–Aedes provides three types of predictive tools and their ensemble forecast. Figure 12 illustrates the predicting results of the dengue outbreak in Cambodia during 2022. The first 13 data points (before 27 April) represent weekly dengue cases, while the remaining points (including/after 27 April) denote the predictions. Figure 12a displays the distribution of SEIR-SEI-EnKF predictions for the next three weeks, including quantiles and median. Figure 12b illustrates the neural network prediction for the next three weeks. Figure 12c shows the results of the particle filter, presenting the distribution for the next four weeks. Figure 12d displays the result of the super-ensemble, showcasing the median prediction from each member, the average, and weighted average of the members.
Table 2 displays the outcome of the prediction as well as the reported cases. All of the reported cases in the following weeks are situated within the prediction range, which confirms the precision of the prediction tools.

6. Discussion

Dengue fever is a viral mosquito-borne disease transmitted predominately by the Aedes mosquitoes. It infects an estimated 400 million people annually, with nearly half the world’s population at risk of infection [46]. Dengue cases are influenced by complex interactions of ecology, environment, meteorological factors, and virus factors (serotype), among many others [47].
The PICTUREE-Aedes is an innovative and unique system that serves as a valuable resource for both researchers and health officials in their efforts to advance scientific research and to effectively manage dengue outbreaks. By collecting and aggregating a comprehensive set of critical factors related to dengue transmission, such as reanalyzed temperature, precipitation, occurrences of Aedes mosquitoes, and dengue cases, the PICTUREE-Aedes provides researchers with a rich dataset for their investigations. This data-driven approach allows researchers to gain deeper insights into the complex dynamics of dengue transmission and aids in the development of more effective prevention and control strategies. In addition to its research-oriented features, the PICTUREE-Aedes offers essential information to health officials, enabling them to proactively prepare and adapt to the changing situation during dengue outbreaks. The system employs sophisticated algorithms to estimate Aedes mosquito abundance, dengue transmission reproduction number, and dengue risk, providing crucial insights into the intensity and geographical spread of the disease. Armed with this knowledge, health officials can make informed decisions about when and where to implement targeted vector control measures, effectively minimizing the risk of dengue transmission and safeguarding public health. Moreover, the PICTUREE-Aedes goes beyond monitoring and estimation by offering valuable and accurate forecasting capabilities. By utilizing its advanced modeling techniques, the system can predict future dengue case counts, empowering health officials and healthcare facilities to deploy medical personnel and to allocate treatment resources more efficiently. This forecasting functionality is instrumental in anticipating the potential impact of dengue outbreaks, enabling proactive measures to be taken in terms of resource allocation, capacity planning, and public health awareness campaigns.
The selection of a 6-month forecast horizon was made without a specific rationale. The forecast horizon relies on the availability of dependable environmental variables for the future. Presently, we employ the average temperatures from previous years for the corresponding timeframe in the next six months. However, the current values of the calculated variables are adjusted based on the most recent available environmental data. The current levels will influence the future levels of the calculated variable. However, for the dengue case number forecast horizon, we chose 3 weeks because human intervention can change the underlying physical transmission process in the long term.
Concerning possible limitations of the proposed system, the temperatures displayed are collected by the weather stations; thus, they do not always reflect temperature in areas close to the weather station. For example, shaded and barren areas near the same weather station will be considered at the same daily temperature. In contrast, the actual temperature of those places can range significantly. There are many water sources beyond precipitation, and Aedes mosquitoes are very efficient at finding these areas to lay eggs, such as domestic or industrial wastewater, sprinkler systems, air conditioning units, etc. [48]. Therefore, the accuracy of the local temperature and precipitation and the estimation results obtained considering only temperature and precipitation can be erroneous in some areas, and local data are needed to adjust the models. Furthermore, human behaviors cannot be accounted for at this time [49]. Water collection during the dry seasons, litter accumulating water, and irrigating lawns have all been demonstrated to impact Ae. aegytpi numbers, and this global model cannot account for local behaviors at this time [50]. In the future, local models can be generated and placed within the global model. Additionally, there is an increasing significance of female mosquito vertical transmission through the dry quiescent egg population. These infected eggs play a potential role in triggering dengue incidence following periods of low mosquito activity, such as the dry season [51]. In our future work, we plan to explore the dynamics of female mosquito vertical transmission in greater depth. This will involve investigating the factors influencing the rate of infected eggs, studying the survival and viability of infected offspring, and analyzing the potential amplification of dengue transmission through this mode. For the predictions, four different approaches provide reasonably accurate forecasts. However, some manual calibrations of the tools are needed to make the predictions more accurate at a local scale.
Future improvements include increasing the accuracy of the population abundance estimation in areas where no data are available, exploring the dynamics of female mosquito vertical transmission, optimizing the layout of the webpage, extrapolating the mosquito population dynamics from surveyed areas to unknown regions, and extending the tool to Culex mosquito genera.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12060771/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Y., A.V., T.F., L.W.C. and C.S.; methodology, C.Y., A.V., T.F., L.W.C. and C.S.; software, T.F., C.Y. and A.V.; validation, C.Y., A.V., T.F., L.W.C. and C.S.; formal analysis, C.Y., A.V., T.F., L.W.C. and C.S.; investigation, C.Y., A.V., T.F., L.W.C. and C.S.; resources, C.Y., A.V., T.F., L.W.C. and C.S.; data curation, A.V. and T.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Y., A.V. and T.F.; writing—review and editing, C.Y., A.V., T.F., L.W.C. and C.S.; visualization, T.F.; supervision, L.W.C. and C.S.; project administration, L.W.C. and C.S.; funding acquisition, C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of the Army, US Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Natick Contracting Division, Fort Detrick, under DWFP grant W911QY-19-1-0004.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available. Weather station data can be found here: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00516 (accessed on 20 April 2023). ERA5 hourly data are openly available in “ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS)”, DOI: 10.24381, reference number [25]. Aedes mosquito occurrence data are openly available in “Kraemer M. U. G. 2015. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.47v3c”, reference number [29]. Dengue occurrence data is openly available in “Messina, J., Brady, O., Pigott, D. et al. A global compendium of human dengue virus occurrence. Sci Data 1, 140004 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2014.4”, reference number [30]. Google trends data can be found here: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%201-d&geo=US&q=dengue,fever&hl=en (accessed on 20 April 2023). Other data are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wilder-Smith, A.; Ooi, E.E.; Horstick, O.; Wills, B. Dengue. Lancet 2019, 393, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rocklöv, J.; Quam, M.B.; Sudre, B.; German, M.; Kraemer, M.U.; Brady, O.; Bogoch, I.I.; Liu-Helmersson, J.; Wilder-Smith, A.; Semenza, J.C.; et al. Assessing seasonal risks for the introduction and mosquito-borne spread of Zika virus in Europe. EBioMedicine 2016, 9, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Polwiang, S. The time series seasonal patterns of dengue fever and associated weather variables in Bangkok (2003–2017). BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, P.C.; Guo, H.R.; Lung, S.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Su, H.J. Weather as an effective predictor for occurrence of dengue fever in Taiwan. Acta Trop. 2007, 103, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, H.; Macoris, M.D.L.D.G.; Galvani, K.C.; Andrighetti, M.T.M.; Wanderley, D.M.V. Assessing the effects of temperature on the population of Aedes aegypti, the vector of dengue. Epidemiol. Infect. 2009, 137, 1188–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Watts, D.M.; Burke, D.S.; Harrison, B.A.; Whitmire, R.E.; Nisalak, A. Effect of Temperature on the Vector Efficiency of Aedes aegypti for Dengue 2 Virus; Army Medical Research Inst of Infectious Diseases: Fort Detrick, MD, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  7. Struchiner, C.J.; Rockloev, J.; Wilder-Smith, A.; Massad, E. Increasing dengue incidence in Singapore over the past 40 years: Population growth, climate and mobility. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Focks, D.A.; Haile, D.G.; Daniels, E.; Mount, G.A. Dynamic life table model for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): Analysis of the literature and model development. J. Med. Entomol. 1993, 30, 1003–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Riad, M.H.; Cohnstaedt, L.W.; Scoglio, C.M. Risk Assessment of Dengue Transmission in Bangladesh Using a Spatiotemporal Network Model and Climate Data. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 104, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Eisen, L.; Monaghan, A.J.; Lozano-Fuentes, S.; Steinhoff, D.F.; Hayden, M.H.; Bieringer, P.E. The impact of temperature on the bionomics of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti, with special reference to the cool geographic range margins. J. Med. Entomol. 2014, 51, 496–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Couret, J.; Dotson, E.; Benedict, M.Q. Benedict. Temperature, larval diet, and density effects on development rate and survival of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barbazan, P.; Guiserix, M.; Boonyuan, W.; Tuntaprasart, W.; Pontier, D.; Gonzalez, J.P. Modelling the effect of temperature on transmission of dengue. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2010, 24, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martinez, E.Z.; Silva, E.A.S.D.; Fabbro, A.L.D. A SARIMA forecasting model to predict the number of cases of dengue in Campinas, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2011, 44, 436–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brooks, L.C.; Farrow, D.C.; Hyun, S.; Tibshirani, R.J.; Rosenfeld, R. Flexible modeling of epidemics with an empirical Bayes framework. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2015, 11, e1004382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, Y.; Liu, T.; Yu, X.; Zeng, Q.; Cai, Z.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, J.; Ma, W.; Pei, S.; et al. An ensemble forecast system for tracking dynamics of dengue outbreaks and its validation in China. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2022, 18, e1010218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yi, C.; Cohnstaedt, L.W.; Scoglio, C.M. SEIR-SEI-EnKF: A new model for estimating and forecasting dengue outbreak dynamics. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 156758–156767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. DeFelice, N.B.; Little, E.; Campbell, S.R.; Shaman, J. Ensemble forecast of human West Nile virus cases and mosquito infection rates. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. ur Rehman, M.J.; Dass, S.C.; Asirvadam, V.S.; Adly, A. Parameter estimation for nonlinear disease dynamical system using particle filter. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications (IC3INA), Bandung, Indonesia, 5–7 October 2015; pp. 143–147. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao, X.; Li, K.; Ang, C.K.E.; Cheong, K.H. A deep learning based hybrid architecture for weekly dengue incidences forecasting. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2023, 168, 113170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ferdousi, T.; Cohnstaedt, L.W.; Scoglio, C.M. A Windowed Correlation-Based Feature Selection Method to Improve Time Series Prediction of Dengue Fever Cases. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 141210–141222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, J.; Xu, K.; Li, Z.; Meng, F.; Tu, T.; Xu, L.; Liu, Q. Forecast of dengue cases in 20 Chinese cities based on the deep learning method. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deb, S.; Deb, S. An ensemble method for early prediction of dengue outbreak. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. Stat. Soc. 2022, 185, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamana, T.K.; Kandula, S.; Shaman, J. Superensemble forecasts of dengue outbreaks. J. R. Soc. Interface 2016, 13, 20160410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (2001): Global Surface Summary of the Day—GSOD. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Available online: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00516 (accessed on 3 April 2023).
  25. Hersbach, H.; Bell, B.; Berrisford, P.; Biavati, G.; Horányi, A.; Muñoz Sabater, J.; Nicolas, J.; Peubey, C.; Radu, R.; Rozum, I.; et al. ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present. Copernic. Clim. Chang. Serv. (C3S) Clim. Data Store (CDS) 2018, 10, 10.24381. [Google Scholar]
  26. Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E. The Global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2002, 89, 199–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. The Nature Conservancy; USDA Forest Service. U.S. Geological Survey. Based on Bailey, Robert G. In Description of the Ecoregions of the United States, 2nd ed.; Misc. Pub. No. 1391, Map Scale 1:7,500,000; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; 108p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wiken, E.B. Terrestrial ecozones of Canada. In Ecological Land Classification Series No. 19; Environment Canada, Hull Quebec: Gatineau, QC, Canada, 1986; p. 26. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kraemer, M.U.; Sinka, M.E.; Duda, K.A.; Mylne, A.; Shearer, F.M.; Brady, O.J.; Messina, J.P.; Barker, C.M.; Moore, C.G.; Carvalho, R.G.; et al. The global compendium of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus occurrence. Sci. Data 2015, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  30. Messina, J.P.; Brady, O.J.; Pigott, D.M.; Brownstein, J.S.; Hoen, A.G.; Hay, S.I. A global compendium of human dengue virus occurrence. Sci. Data 2014, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Dengue Fever-Explore-Google Trends. Available online: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=now%201-d&geo=US&q=dengue,fever&hl=en (accessed on 3 April 2023).
  32. PAHO/WHO Data—National Dengue Fever Cases. Available online: https://www3.paho.org/data/index.php/en/mnu-topics/indicadores-dengue-en/dengue-nacional-en/252-dengue-pais-ano-en.html (accessed on 15 May 2023).
  33. Murphy, A.; Rajahram, G.S.; Jilip, J.; Maluda, M.; William, T.; Hu, W.; Reid, S.; Devine, G.J.; Frentiu, F.D. Incidence and epidemiological features of dengue in Sabah, Malaysia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0007504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaudhry, M.; Ahmad, S.; Rashid, H.B.; Uddin, I. Dengue epidemic in postconflict swat district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, 2013. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017, 96, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, Z.; Bambrick, H.; Yakob, L.; Devine, G.; Frentiu, F.D.; Salazar, F.V.; Bonsato, R.; Hu, W. High relative humidity might trigger the occurrence of the second seasonal peak of dengue in the Philippines. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 708, 134849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hii, Y.L.; Zhu, H.; Ng, N.; Ng, L.C.; Rocklöv, J. Forecast of dengue incidence using temperature and rainfall. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liyanage, P.; Tissera, H.; Sewe, M.; Quam, M.; Amarasinghe, A.; Palihawadana, P.; Wilder-Smith, A.; Louis, V.R.; Tozan, Y.; Rocklöv, J. A spatial hierarchical analysis of the temporal influences of the El Nino-southern oscillation and weather on dengue in Kalutara District, Sri Lanka. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vásquez, P.; Loría, A.; Sanchez, F.; Barboza, L.A. Climate-driven statistical models as effective predictors of local dengue incidence in costa rica: A generalized additive model and random forest approach. Rev. MatemáTica TeoríA Apl. 2020, 27, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cuong, H.Q.; Hien, N.T.; Duong, T.N.; Phong, T.V.; Cam, N.N.; Farrar, J.; Nam, V.S.; Thai, K.T.; Horby, P. Quantifying the emergence of dengue in Hanoi, Vietnam: 1998–2009. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lourenço, J.; Recker, M. The 2012 Madeira dengue outbreak: Epidemiological determinants and future epidemic potential. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Edler, D.; Vetter, M. The simplicity of modern audiovisual web cartography: An example with the open-source javascript library leaflet. js. KN-J. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. 2019, 69, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tilkov, S.; Vinoski, S. Node. js: Using JavaScript to build high-performance network programs. IEEE Internet Comput. 2010, 14, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zimányi, E.; Sakr, M.; Lesuisse, A. MobilityDB: A mobility database based on PostgreSQL and PostGIS. ACM Trans. Database Syst. (TODS) 2020, 45, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cascón-Katchadourian, J.D.; Ruiz-Rodríguez, A.Á. Description and Evaluation of MapTiler Software: From Scanned Map to Interactive Layer for Web Publishing. 2016. Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5730199 (accessed on 20 April 2023).
  45. Haklay, M.; Weber, P. Openstreetmap: User-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2008, 7, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Züst, R.; Toh, Y.X.; Valdés, I.; Cerny, D.; Heinrich, J.; Hermida, L.; Marcos, E.; Guillén, G.; Kalinke, U.; Shi, P.Y.; et al. Type I interferon signals in macrophages and dendritic cells control dengue virus infection: Implications for a new mouse model to test dengue vaccines. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 7276–7285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xiang, J.; Hansen, A.; Liu, Q.; Liu, X.; Tong, M.X.; Sun, Y.; Cameron, S.; Hanson-Easey, S.; Han, G.S.; Williams, C.; et al. Association between dengue fever incidence and meteorological factors in Guangzhou, China, 2005–2014. Environ. Res. 2017, 153, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. World Health Organization. Manual on Environmental Management for Mosquito Control, with Special Emphasis on Malaria Vectors; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1982.
  49. Barrera, R.; Amador, M.; MacKay, A.J. Population dynamics of Aedes aegypti and dengue as influenced by weather and human behavior in San Juan, Puerto Rico. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2011, 5, e1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nguyen, L.A.P.; Clements, A.C.; Jeffery, J.A.; Yen, N.T.; Nam, V.S.; Vaughan, G.; Shinkfield, R.; Kutcher, S.C.; Gatton, M.L.; Kay, B.H.; et al. Abundance and prevalence of Aedes aegypti immatures and relationships with household water storage in rural areas in southern Viet Nam. Int. Health 2011, 3, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kurnia, N.; Kaitana, Y.; Salaki, C.L.; Mandey, L.C.; Tuda, J.S.B.; Tallei, T.E. Study of Dengue Virus Transovarial Transmission in Aedes spp. in Ternate City Using Streptavidin-Biotin-Peroxidase Complex Immunohistochemistry. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2022, 14, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Life cycle of Aedes aegypti and the parameters influencing the transition between different stages.
Figure 1. Life cycle of Aedes aegypti and the parameters influencing the transition between different stages.
Pathogens 12 00771 g001
Figure 2. Dengue transmission risk map. Green and yellow dots represent training data; red and blue indicate the risk value above and below 0.5.
Figure 2. Dengue transmission risk map. Green and yellow dots represent training data; red and blue indicate the risk value above and below 0.5.
Pathogens 12 00771 g002
Figure 3. Neural network model for predicting dengue cases.
Figure 3. Neural network model for predicting dengue cases.
Pathogens 12 00771 g003
Figure 4. Particle filter transmission model for forecasting dengue cases.
Figure 4. Particle filter transmission model for forecasting dengue cases.
Pathogens 12 00771 g004
Figure 5. Components and architecture of the application.
Figure 5. Components and architecture of the application.
Pathogens 12 00771 g005
Figure 6. Graphical interface of the PICTUREE–Aedes.
Figure 6. Graphical interface of the PICTUREE–Aedes.
Pathogens 12 00771 g006
Figure 7. Weather station data. (a) Locations of the weather stations in Central Indochina. (b) Temperature and precipitation data of the selected station in 2022.
Figure 7. Weather station data. (a) Locations of the weather stations in Central Indochina. (b) Temperature and precipitation data of the selected station in 2022.
Pathogens 12 00771 g007
Figure 8. Occurrence data of dengue, Aedes aegypti mosquito, and Aedes albopictus mosquito.
Figure 8. Occurrence data of dengue, Aedes aegypti mosquito, and Aedes albopictus mosquito.
Pathogens 12 00771 g008
Figure 9. Google search trends of “dengue” and “fever”.
Figure 9. Google search trends of “dengue” and “fever”.
Pathogens 12 00771 g009
Figure 10. Mosquito simulation results visualized spatially. (a) Reanalyzed average temperature, range [−10, 40]. (b) Dengue transmission reproduction number R t , range [0, 7]. (c) Vector–host ratio, range [0, 0.65]. (d) Dengue transmission risk, range [0, 1].
Figure 10. Mosquito simulation results visualized spatially. (a) Reanalyzed average temperature, range [−10, 40]. (b) Dengue transmission reproduction number R t , range [0, 7]. (c) Vector–host ratio, range [0, 0.65]. (d) Dengue transmission risk, range [0, 1].
Pathogens 12 00771 g010
Figure 11. Mosquito simulation results visualized temporally. (a) Reanalyzed average temperature. (b) Dengue transmission reproduction number. (c) Vector–host ratio. (d) Dengue transmission risk.
Figure 11. Mosquito simulation results visualized temporally. (a) Reanalyzed average temperature. (b) Dengue transmission reproduction number. (c) Vector–host ratio. (d) Dengue transmission risk.
Pathogens 12 00771 g011aPathogens 12 00771 g011b
Figure 12. Forecasts of the dengue cases in Cambodia. (a) Forecasts of the SEIR-SEI-EnKF model. (b) Forecasts of the neural network model. (c) Forecasts of the particle filter model. (d) Forecasts of the super-ensemble model.
Figure 12. Forecasts of the dengue cases in Cambodia. (a) Forecasts of the SEIR-SEI-EnKF model. (b) Forecasts of the neural network model. (c) Forecasts of the particle filter model. (d) Forecasts of the super-ensemble model.
Pathogens 12 00771 g012aPathogens 12 00771 g012b
Table 1. Data sources.
Table 1. Data sources.
ItemSourceRemark
Daily weather observation[24]Updated weekly
ERA5 hourly data[25]2018–present
Terrestrial ecoregions[26,27,28]As of 14 December 2009
Aedes mosquito occurrence[29]1960–2014
Dengue occurrence[30]1960–2012
Country-wise Google trends[31]2015–2022
Table 2. Number of predicted cumulative cases and relative absolute error in Cambodia.
Table 2. Number of predicted cumulative cases and relative absolute error in Cambodia.
27 April 20224 May 202211 May 2022
Reported cases137916851995
Kalman filter (Median)1229/10.9%1293/23.3%1338/32.9%
Neural network1414/2.5%1795/6.5%2243/12.4%
Particle filter (Median)1298/5.9%1492/11.5%1686/15.5%
Super ensemble (weighted average)1302/5.6%1500/11.0%1703/14.6%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yi, C.; Vajdi, A.; Ferdousi, T.; Cohnstaedt, L.W.; Scoglio, C. PICTUREE—Aedes: A Web Application for Dengue Data Visualization and Case Prediction. Pathogens 2023, 12, 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060771

AMA Style

Yi C, Vajdi A, Ferdousi T, Cohnstaedt LW, Scoglio C. PICTUREE—Aedes: A Web Application for Dengue Data Visualization and Case Prediction. Pathogens. 2023; 12(6):771. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060771

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yi, Chunlin, Aram Vajdi, Tanvir Ferdousi, Lee W. Cohnstaedt, and Caterina Scoglio. 2023. "PICTUREE—Aedes: A Web Application for Dengue Data Visualization and Case Prediction" Pathogens 12, no. 6: 771. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060771

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop