Factors Associated with Toxoplasma gondii Seroprevalence in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population and Data Collection
2.2. Determining the Status of T. gondii Infection
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Molan, A.; Nosaka, K.; Hunter, M.; Wang, W. Global status of Toxoplasma gondii infection: Systematic review and prevalence snapshots. Trop. Biomed. 2019, 36, 898–925. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pappas, G.; Roussos, N.; Falagas, M.E. Toxoplasmosis snapshots: Global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and implications for pregnancy and congenital toxoplasmosis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, C.; Liang, L.J.; Zheng, K.Y.; Zhu, X.Q. Impact of environmental factors on the emergence, transmission and distribution of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bigna, J.J.; Tochie, J.N.; Tounouga, D.N.; Bekolo, A.O.; Ymele, N.S.; Youda, E.L.; Sime, P.S.; Nansseu, J.R. Global, regional, and country seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women: A systematic review, modelling and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motoi, S.; Navolan, D.B.; Malita, D.; Ciohat, I.; Nemescu, D.; Manciuc, C.; Gorun, F.; Vilibic-Cavlek, T.; Boda, D.; Craina, M.; et al. A decreasing trend in toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence among pregnant women in Romania—Results of a large scale study. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 3536–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Šušak, B.; Martinović, K.; Jakovac, S.; Arapović, J. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among general population in Bosnia and Herzegovina: 10-Years single center experience. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2023, 22, 101336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bobić, B.; Nikolić, A.; Klun, I.; Djurković-Djaković, O. Kinetics of Toxoplasma infection in the Balkans. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2011, 123, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bobić, B.; Nikolić, A.; Djurković-Djaković, O. Identifikacija faktora rizika za infekciju parazitom Toxoplasma gondii u Srbiji kao osnov programa prevencije kongenitalne toksoplazmoze [Identification of risk factors for infection with Toxoplasma gondii in Serbia as a basis of a program for prevention of congenital toxoplasmosis]. Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek. 2003, 131, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bobić, B.; Nikolić, A.; Klun, I.; Vujanić, M.; Djurković-Djaković, O. Undercooked meat consumption remains the major risk factor for Toxoplasma infection in Serbia. Parassitologia 2007, 49, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bobić, B.; Jevremović, I.; Marinković, J.; Sibalić, D.; Djurković-Djaković, O. Risk factors for Toxoplasma infection in a reproductive age female population in the area of Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 1998, 14, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Afonso, E.; Thulliez, P.; Gilot-Fromont, E. Local meteorological conditions, dynamics of seroconversion to Toxoplasma gondii in cats (Felis catus) and oocyst burden in a rural environment. Epidemiol. Infect. 2010, 138, 1105–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cook, A.J.; Gilbert, R.E.; Buffolano, W.; Zufferey, J.; Petersen, E.; Jenum, P.A.; Foulon, W.; Semprini, A.E.; Dunn, D.T. Sources of toxoplasma infection in pregnant women: European multicentre case-control study. European Research Network on Congenital Toxoplasmosis. BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.) 2000, 321, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bieńkowski, C.; Aniszewska, M.; Kowalczyk, M.; Popielska, J.; Zawadka, K.; Ołdakowska, A.; Pokorska-Śpiewak, M. Analysis of Preventable Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Pregnant Women: Case-Control Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Findal, G.; Helbig, A.; Haugen, G.; Jenum, P.A.; Stray-Pedersen, B. Management of suspected primary Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women in Norway: Twenty years of experience of amniocentesis in a low-prevalence population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wallon, M.; Peyron, F.; Cornu, C.; Vinault, S.; Abrahamowicz, M.; Kopp, C.B.; Binquet, C. Congenital toxoplasma infection: Monthly prenatal screening decreases transmission rate and improves clinical outcome at age 3 years. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2013, 56, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desmonts, G.; Remington, J.S. Direct agglutination test for diagnosis of Toxoplasma infection: Method for increasing sensitivity and specificity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1980, 1, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Findal, G.; Barlinn, R.; Sandven, I.; Stray-Pedersen, B.; Nordbø, S.A.; Samdal, H.H.; Vainio, K.; Dudman, S.G.; Jenum, P.A. Toxoplasma prevalence among pregnant women in Norway: A cross-sectional study. APMIS Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. 2015, 123, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petersson, K.; Stray-Pedersen, B.; Malm, G.; Forsgren, M.; Evengård, B. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women in Sweden. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2000, 79, 824–829. [Google Scholar]
- Hofhuis, A.; van Pelt, W.; van Duynhoven, Y.T.H.P.; Nijhuis, C.D.M.; Mollema, L.; van der Klis, F.R.M.; Havelaar, A.H.; Kortbeek, L.M. Decreased prevalence and age-specific risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibodies in The Netherlands between 1995/1996 and 2006/2007. Epidemiol. Infect. 2011, 139, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, E.; de Valk, H.; Villena, I.; Le Strat, Y.; Tourdjman, M. National perinatal survey demonstrates a decreasing seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women in France, 1995 to 2016: Impact for screening policy. Euro Surveill. 2021, 26, 1900710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piffer, S.; Lauriola, A.L.; Pradal, U.; Collini, L.; Dell’Anna, L.; Pavanello, L. Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy: A ten-year observation in the province of Trento, Italy. Infez. Med. 2020, 28, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Georgieva Rainova, I.; Nenkov Harizanov, R.; Tsvetkov Kaftandjiev, I.; Dimitrova Tsvetkova, N.; Borisova Enikova, R.; Vanyova Videnova, M.; Kaneva, E.M.; Todorova, Y.D. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among different groups of patients in Bulgaria and algorithm for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis, applied in the National Reference Laboratory for Diagnosis of Parasitic Diseases, Bulgaria. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2022, 14, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Congenital toxoplasmosis. In ECDC. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2020; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2023; Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/congenital-toxoplasmosis-annual-epidemiological-report-2020 (accessed on 3 October 2023).
- Prusa, A.R.; Kasper, D.C.; Sawers, L.; Walter, E.; Hayde, M.; Stillwaggon, E. Congenital toxoplasmosis in Austria: Prenatal screening for prevention is cost-saving. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dabritz, H.A.; Miller, M.A.; Atwill, E.R.; Gardner, I.A.; Leutenegger, C.M.; Melli, A.C.; Conrad, P.A. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii-like oocysts in cat feces and estimates of the environmental oocyst burden. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2007, 231, 1676–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dumètre, A.; Dardé, M. How to detect Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in environmental samples? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, H.; Exel, K.E.; Swart, A.; Bonačić Marinović, A.A.; Dam-Deisz, C.; van der Giessen, J.W.B.; Opsteegh, M. Digging into Toxoplasma gondii infections via soil: A quantitative microbial risk assessment approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755 Pt 2, 143232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens (Gallus domesticus): Prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis and public health significance. Zoonoses Public Health 2010, 57, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kijlstra, A.; Eissen, O.A.; Cornelissen, J.; Munniksma, K.; Eijck, I.; Kortbeek, T. Toxoplasma gondii infection in animal-friendly pig production systems. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 3165–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlović, I.; Ivanović, S. Contamination of poultry meat with Toxoplasma gondii: Risk factor in occurrence of toxoplasmatic reaction in humans. Vet. Glas. 2002, 56, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geuthner, A.C.; Koethe, M.; Ludewig, M.; Pott, S.; Schares, G.; Daugschies, A.; Bangoura, B. Persistence of Toxoplasma gondii tissue stages in poultry over a conventional fattening cycle. Parasitology 2014, 141, 1359–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geuthner, A.C.; Koethe, M.; Ludewig, M.; Pott, S.; Schares, G.; Maksimov, P.; Daugschies, A.; Bangoura, B. Development of an in vivo model for Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens and turkeys simulating natural routes of infection. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 276, 108956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fanigliulo, D.; Marchi, S.; Montomoli, E.; Trombetta, C.M. Toxoplasma gondii in women of childbearing age and during pregnancy: Seroprevalence study in Central and Southern Italy from 2013 to 2017. Toxoplasma gondii chez les femmes en âge de procréer et pendant la grossesse: Étude de la séroprévalence dans le centre et le sud de l’Italie de 2013 à 2017. Parasite 2020, 27, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Csep, A.; Vaida, L.L.; Negruțiu, B.M.; Todor, B.I.; Judea-Pusta, C.T.; Buhaș, C.; Sava, C. Research on demographic, clinical and paraclinical aspects in pregnant women infected with Toxoplasma gondii. Exp. Ther. Med. 2022, 23, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, G.M.S.; Simões, J.M.; Schaer, R.E.; Freire, S.M.; Nascimento, R.J.M.; Pinheiro, A.M.C.M.; Carvalho, S.M.S.; Mariano, A.P.M.; Carvalho, R.C.; Munhoz, A.D. Frequency and factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and their pets in Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2019, 52, e20190250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mwambe, B.; Mshana, S.E.; Kidenya, B.R.; Massinde, A.N.; Mazigo, H.D.; Michael, D.; Majinge, C.; Groß, U. Sero-prevalence and factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Mwanza, Tanzania. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adugna, B.; Tarekegn, Z.S.; Damtie, D.; Woldegebreal, S.N.; Raju, R.P.; Maru, M.; Ayele, A. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Northwest Ethiopia. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 1295–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nowakowska, D.; Stray-Pedersen, B.; Spiewak, E.; Sobala, W.; Małafiej, E.; Wilczyński, J. Prevalence and estimated incidence of Toxoplasma infection among pregnant women in Poland: A decreasing trend in the younger population. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandoval-Carrillo, A.A.; Vértiz-Hernández, A.A.; Salas-Pacheco, J.M.; González-Lugo, O.E.; Antuna-Salcido, E.I.; Salas-Pacheco, S.M.; Sánchez-Anguiano, L.F.; Méndez-Hernández, E.M.; Hernández-Tinoco, J.; Castellanos-Juárez, F.X.; et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women: A cross-sectional study in Matehuala City, Mexico. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e033995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarado-Esquivel, C.; Terrones-Saldívar Mdel, C.; Hernández-Tinoco, J.; Muñoz-Terrones, M.D.; Gallegos-González, R.O.; Sánchez-Anguiano, L.F.; Reyes-Robles, M.E.; Jaramillo-Juárez, F.; Liesenfeld, O.; Estrada-Martínez, S. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women in Aguascalientes City, Mexico: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e012409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Total n (%) | T. gondii Seronegative n (%) | T. gondii Seropositive n (%) | Univariate Logistic Regression OR (95% CI) | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age group 20–24 years 25–29 years 30–34 years 35–40 years >40 years | 300 (100) 27 (9.0) 78 (26.0) 132 (44.0) 44 (14.7) 19 (6.3) | 262 (100) 23 (8.8) 65 (24.8) 114 (43.5) 42 (16.0) 18 (6.9) | 38 (100) 4 (10.5) 13 (34.2) 18 (47.4) 2 (5.3) 1 (2.6) | Ref. 1.2 (0.34–3.89) 0.9 (0.28–2.93) 0.3 (0.05–1.61) 0.3 (0.03–3.11) | 0.822 0.872 0.152 0.326 |
Level of education Elementary school High school University | 280 (100) 18 (6.4) 117 (41.8) 145 (51.8) | 245 (100) 16 (6.5) 104 (42.4) 125 (51.0) | 35 (100) 2 (5.7) 13 (37.1) 20 (57.1) | Ref. 1.0 (0.20–4.85) 1.3 (0.27–5.99) | 1.00 0.754 |
Residence area Suburban Urban | 300 (100) 31 (10.3) 269 (89.7) | 262 (100) 24 (9.2) 238 (90.8) | 38 (100) 7 (18.4) 31 (81.6) | 2.2 (0.89–5.62) | 0.086 |
Type of housing Townhouse with garden Flat in building | 300 (100) 113 (37.7) 187 (62.3) | 262 (100) 92 (35.1) 170 (64.9) | 38 (100) 21 (55.3) 17 (44.7) | 2.3 (1.15–4.54) | 0.019 |
Lifestyle Habits | Total n (%) | T. gondii Seronegative n (%) | T. gondii Seropositive n (%) | Univariate Logistic Regression OR (95% CI) | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contact with soil Yes No | 300 (100.0) 74 (24.7) 226 (75.3) | 262 (100.0) 60 (22.9) 202 (77.1) | 38 (100.0) 14 (36.8) 24 (63.2) | 1.9 (0.96–4.03) | 0.066 |
Contact with cat Yes No | 300 (100.0) 69 (23.0) 231 (77.0) | 262 (100.0) 59 (22.5) 203 (77.5) | 38 (100.0) 10 (26.3) 28 (73.7) | 1.2 (0.56–2.68) | 0.604 |
Owner of cat Yes No | 300 (100.0) 22 (7.3) 278 (92.7) | 262 (100.0) 17 (6.5) 245 (93.5) | 38 (100.0) 5 (13.2) 33 (86.7) | 2.2 (0.76–6.13) | 0.149 |
Contact with outdoor cat Yes No | 300 (100.0) 55 (18.3) 245 (81.7) | 262 (100.0) 48 (18.3) 214 (81.7) | 38 (100.0) 7 (18.4) 31 (81.6) | 1.0 (0.42–2.42) | 0.988 |
Consumption of meat Yes No | 300 (100.0) 297 (99.0) 3 (1.0) | 262 (100.0) 259 (98.9) 3 (1.1) | 38 (100.0) 38 (100.0) 0 (0) | 0.4 (0.04–4.23) | 0.468 |
Consumption of raw/undercooked meat Yes No | 291 (100.0) 82 (28.2) 209 (71.8) | 253 (100.0) 73 (28.9) 180 (71.1) | 38 (100.0) 9 (23.7) 29 (76.3) | 0.8 (0.35–1.70) | 0.510 |
Type of meat Beef Pork Lamb Chicken More than one type | 297 (100.0) 22 (7.4) 59 (19.9) 2 (0.7) 175 (58.9) 39 (13.1) | 259 (100.0) 16 (6.2) 51 (19.7) 1 (0.4) 158 (61.0) 33 (12.7) | 38 (100.0) 6 (15.8) 8 (21.1) 1 (2.6) 17 (44.7) 6 (15.8) | Ref. 0.4 (0.13–1.39) 2.7 (0.14–49.76) 0.3 (0.10–0.83) 0.5 (0.13–1.74) | 0.154 0.511 0.021 0.267 |
Total n (%) | T. gondii Seronegative n (%) | T. gondii Seropositive n (%) | Univariate Logistic Regression OR (95% CI) | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First pregnancy | 282 (100.0) | 249 (100.0) | 33 (100.0) | ||
Yes | 151 (53.5) | 130 (52.2) | 21 (63.6) | 1.6 (0.76–3.39) | 0.219 |
No | 131 (46.5) | 119 (47.8) | 12 (36.4) | ||
Pregnancy trimester | 296 (100.0) | 258 (100.0) | 38 (100.0) | ||
I | 72 (24.3) | 59 (22.9) | 13 (34.2) | Ref. | |
II | 57 (19.3) | 51 (19.8) | 6 (15.8) | 0.5 (0.19–1.51) | 0.236 |
III | 167 (56.4) | 148 (57.4) | 19 (50.0) | 0.6 (0.27–1.25) | 0.168 |
Normal pregnancy | 194 (100.0) | 169 (100.0) | 25 (100.0) | ||
Yes | 183 (94.3) | 160 (94.7) | 23 (92.0) | 0.5 (0.19–1.51) | 0.236 |
No | 11 (5.7) | 9 (5.3) | 2 (8.0) | ||
Spontaneous abortion history | 274 (100.0) | 242 (100.0) | 32 (100.0) | ||
Yes | 42 (15.3) | 39 (16.1) | 3 (9.4) | 0.6 (0.27–1.25) | 0.168 |
No | 232 (84.7) | 203 (83.9) | 29 (90.6) | ||
Preterm birth history | 275 (100.0) | 243 (100.0) | 32(100.0) | ||
Yes | 8 (2.9) | 8 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) | NA | 0.999 |
No | 267 (97.1) | 235 (96.7) | 32 (100) | ||
Stillbirth history | 273 (100.0) | 241 (100.0) | 32(100.0) | ||
Yes | 4 (1.5) | 3 (1.2) | 1 (3.1) | 2.6 (0.26–25.37) | 0.422 |
No | 269 (98.5) | 238 (98.8) | 31 (96.7) |
Variable | Multivariate Logistic Regression OR (95% CI) | p Value |
---|---|---|
Type of housing | ||
Townhouse with garden | 2.5 (1.21–5.02) | 0.013 |
Flat in building | ||
Type of meat | ||
Beef | Ref. | |
Pork | 0.4 (0.11–1.23) | 0.104 |
Lamb | 3.9 (0.20–73.66) | 0.370 |
Chicken | 0.3 (0.94–0.83) | 0.021 |
More than one type | 0.5 (0.13–1.79) | 0.279 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Marković-Denić, L.; Stopić, M.; Bobić, B.; Nikolić, V.; Djilas, I.; Srzentić, S.J.; Štajner, T. Factors Associated with Toxoplasma gondii Seroprevalence in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Belgrade, Serbia. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101240
Marković-Denić L, Stopić M, Bobić B, Nikolić V, Djilas I, Srzentić SJ, Štajner T. Factors Associated with Toxoplasma gondii Seroprevalence in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Belgrade, Serbia. Pathogens. 2023; 12(10):1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101240
Chicago/Turabian StyleMarković-Denić, Ljiljana, Milena Stopić, Branko Bobić, Vladimir Nikolić, Iva Djilas, Snežana Jovanović Srzentić, and Tijana Štajner. 2023. "Factors Associated with Toxoplasma gondii Seroprevalence in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Belgrade, Serbia" Pathogens 12, no. 10: 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101240
APA StyleMarković-Denić, L., Stopić, M., Bobić, B., Nikolić, V., Djilas, I., Srzentić, S. J., & Štajner, T. (2023). Factors Associated with Toxoplasma gondii Seroprevalence in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Belgrade, Serbia. Pathogens, 12(10), 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101240