Next Article in Journal
RAPD-PCR-Based Fingerprinting Method as a Tool for Epidemiological Analysis of Trueperella pyogenes Infections
Previous Article in Journal
What Do Antibody Studies Tell Us about Viral Infections?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bartonella henselae Recombinant Pap31 for the Diagnosis of Canine and Human Bartonelloses
 
 
pathogens-logo
Article Menu

Article Menu

Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bartonella Endocarditis in Spain: Case Reports of 21 Cases

by
Lara García-Álvarez
1,
Concepción García-García
1,
Patricia Muñoz
2,3,4,5,
María del Carmen Fariñas-Álvarez
6,7,8,
Manuel Gutiérrez Cuadra
6,7,8,
Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo
7,9,10,
Elisa García-Vázquez
11,12,
Encarnación Moral-Escudero
11,
María del Mar Alonso-Socas
13,
Dácil García-Rosado
13,
Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio
14,
Fernando Domínguez
15,
Josune Goikoetxea-Agirre
16,
Juan Carlos Gainzarain
17,
María Ángeles Rodríguez-Esteban
18,
Xerach Bosch-Guerra
19,
José A. Oteo
1,* and
On behalf of Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis infecciosa en España (GAMES)
1
Infectious Diseases Department, San Pedro University Hospital-Center for Biomedical Research from La Rioja (CIBIR), 26006 Logroño, Spain
2
Servicio de Microbiología Clínica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
3
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
4
CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias-CIBERES (CB06/06/0058), 28029 Madrid, Spain
5
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
6
Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla IDIVAL, 39008 Santander, Spain
7
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas-CIBERINFEC (CB21/13/00068), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
8
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain
9
Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
10
Departamento de Medicina Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
11
Servicio de Medicina Interna-Infecciosas, IMIB, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain
12
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
13
Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 Tenerife, Spain
14
Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain
15
Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, 28222 Madrid, Spain
16
Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, 48903 Bilbao, Spain
17
Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario de Álava, 01009 Vitoria, Spain
18
Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Cardiológicos, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain
19
Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis infecciosa en España are listed in Supplementary Material.
Pathogens 2022, 11(5), 561; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050561
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 3 May 2022 / Accepted: 5 May 2022 / Published: 10 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Evolving Biomedical Importance of Bartonella Species Infections)

Abstract

:
Blood culture negative endocarditis (BCNE) is frequent in infective endocarditis (IE). One of the causes of BCNE is fastidious microorganisms, such as Bartonella spp. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiologic, clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with Bartonella IE from the “Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis-Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis infecciosa en España (GAMES)”cohort. Here we presented 21 cases of Bartonella IE. This represents 0.3% of a total of 5590 cases and 2% of the BCNE from the GAMES cohort. 62% were due to Bartonella henselae and 38% to Bartonella quintana. Cardiac failure was the main presenting form (61.5% in B. hensalae, 87.5% in B. quintana IE) and the aortic valve was affected in 85% of the cases (76% in B. henselae, 100% in B. quintana IE). Typical signs such as fever were recorded in less than 40% of patients. Echocardiography showed vegetations in 92% and 100% of the patients with B. henselae and B. quintana, respectively. Culture was positive only in one patient and the remaining were diagnosed by serology and PCR. PCR was the most useful tool allowing for diagnosis in 16 patients (100% of the studied valves). Serology, at titers recommended by guidelines, only coincided with PCR in 52.4%. Antimicrobial therapy, in different combinations, was used in all cases. Surgery was performed in 76% of the patients. No in-hospital mortality was observed. One-year mortality was 9.4%. This article remarks the importance for investigating the presence of Bartonella infection as causative agent in all BCNE since the diagnosis needs specific microbiological tools and patients could benefit of a specific treatment.

1. Introduction

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a fatal condition without treatment with an incidence oscillating worldwide between 1.5 and 9.6 cases/100,000 inhabitants [1] although in developed countries it is estimated between 3.1 and 3.7 episodes per 100,000 inhabitants per year [2,3]. The highest incidence occurs in elderly patients with degenerative heart disease and comorbidities such as chronic liver disease, kidney failure and neoplasms [4,5]. In our environment and according to a prospective multicenter registry of 25 Spanish hospitals that analyzed 1804 patients, it has been observed that it mainly affects men (68%) of 55–77 years age, associated, in a considerable percentage, with health procedures or nosocomial environment [6]. Regarding the etiological agents involved in its etiology, 80% of the cases are due to Gram-positive bacteria, mainly due to Staphylococcus spp., followed by Streptococcus spp. and a long list of other bacterial species [6,7].
Blood culture remains the most frequently used technique for etiological diagnosis, although other techniques such as molecular biology have been generalized for microbiological diagnosis. In the Spanish series, 14.7% were blood culture negative endocarditis (BCNE) and in 9.1%, despite using other techniques such as molecular and serological, the etiology was unknown [6]. In the large series of the International Collaboration on Endocarditis in which 2781 patients were collected, BCNE accounted for 11.1% [7]. However, depending on the place and the available techniques where the studies were carried out, BCNE can increase up to 68 and 70% [8,9]. This fact is important since the absence of a microbiological diagnosis, at least in our environment, could be an independent predictor of mortality [10]. There are many causes of BCNE, including difficult-to-culture microorganisms among which are Bartonella spp.
Bartonella spp. are fastidious Gram-negative bacilli, facultative intracellular bacteria, belonging to the Alpha-2 subgroup of the phylum Proteobacteria and includes more than 35 validated species and three subspecies [11,12]. These bacteria are usually transmitted to humans through animal bites or scratches (cats, dogs and other animals) or by scratch inoculation of infected flea and body louse feces [13]. In addition, sand-fly vector-competence was proven for transmission of Bartonella bacilliformis in Peru during the last century [14]. Other arthropods such as ticks, head lice, bedbugs, bat flies and mites have been associated with human Bartonella spp. infections, but their role as vectors remains to be verified [13,15,16,17].
Bartonella spp. have been associated with an expanding clinical spectrum in humans and animals. Some species, such as Bartonella bacilliformis (Oroya fever, Verruga Peruana or Carrión’s disease) cause potentially life-threatening illness, but are limited geographically by the transmitting vector (confined to the highlands of Peru, Colombia and Ecuador) whereas other species such as Bartonella quintana are transmitted by lice under poor hygienic conditions throughout the world. B. quintana the etiological agent of trench fever, also is cause of bacillary angiomatosis and peliosis hepatis in HIV patients, chronic bacteremia, chronic lymphadenopathy, as well as BCNE [13,18]. Bartonella henselae is the most frequent etiological agent of a sub-acute and chronic lymphadenopathy named cat-scratch disease (CSD) in children and teenagers and occurs throughout the world. A subset of CSD patients develop severe or systemic disease manifestations, including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, granulomatous hepatitis and hepatosplenic abscess [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Besides these, at least 15 other Bartonella spp. have been associated with human diseases or have been detected in humans.
Regarding endocarditis due to Bartonella spp., at least eight species have been involved. B. henselae and B. quintana are present in more than 99% of the cases, although other Bartonella spp. such as Bartonella elizabethae, Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii, B. vinsonii subsp. arupensis, Bartonella koehlerae, Bartonella alsatica and “Candidatus Bartonella mayotimonensis”, have been occasionally reported [15,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. In any case, there are few published series of Bartonella IE and when searching about this condition, there are some differences in the epidemiology, such as the distribution of the involved Bartonella spp., and the clinical course.
The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiologic, clinical characteristics, management and outcomes in a cohort of patients with IE due to Bartonella spp. from Spain.

2. Results

2.1. Epidemiological Data

A total of 5590 cases of IE were recorded in the GAMES Cohort between 2008 and 2020. From the total, 832 (14.9%) were diagnosed with BCNE of which, 17 (2%) were IE caused by Bartonella spp. Four additional patients from another hospital were included. Therefore, a total of 21 cases were included. Thirteen of them were caused by B. henselae (61.9%) and the remaining by B. quintana (38.1%). No other species of Bartonella were detected.
The median age of the patients with Bartonella endocarditis was 49 years (IQR: 40–59 years), and mean age was 51.8 years (28–88 years). According to the species of Bartonella, median age of IE caused by B. henselae was 55 years (IQR: 42–58) and 42 years (IQR: 34.5–61.5) with IE caused by B. quintana. Thirteen were men (61.9%), seven of them diagnosed with IE caused by B. henselae and six by B. quintana. Eight of the patients with B. henselae IE were from the north of Spain (8/21 (38.1%) of the total; 8/13 (61.5%) with B. henselae), three from the Canary Islands (3/21 (14.3%) of the total; 3/13 (23.1%) with B. henselae), one from the South of Spain and one from a migrant patient from Morocco. Three patients with B. quintana IE were from the South of Spain (3/21 (14.3%) of the total; 3/8 (37.5%) with B. quintana), one from the Canary Islands one (1/21 (4.8%) of the total; 1/8 (12.5%) with B. quintana), one from Morocco and another from central Spain. The two remaining patients were from Moldavia and from Pakistan.
Five of the thirteen patients (38.5%) of the B. henselae group and three of the eight with B. quintana (37.5%) reported cat or cat flea exposure history. History of alcohol abuse was recorded in one patient with B. henselae IE (1/13; 7.7%) and in two with IE due to B. quintana (2/8; 25%). None of the patients had previous disease caused by Bartonella spp., none had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or were intravenous drug users. Body lice contact or undomiciled/homeless situation were not reported in any patient.
Main epidemiological, clinical and outcomes characteristics are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.

2.2. Clinical Features

According to the medical records, 14 of the 21 patients had previous heart disease (9/13 (69.2%) of the patients with IE due to B. henselae and 5/8 (62.5%) of the patients with IE due to B. quintana). Ten of these patients (41.6%) had previous valve disease (5/13 (38.4%) of the patients with B. henselae IE and 5/8 (62.5%) of the patients with B. quintana IE). Prosthetic valve was present only in one of the B. henselae patients (1/13; 7.7%) and two of this group also had a coronary disease (2/13; 15.4%), three had congenital heart disease (3/13; 23.1%). Two of the patients with B. quintana IE (2/8; 25%) and one of the B. henselae group (1/13; 7.7%) presented previous heart failure. Other medical conditions are shown in Table 2.
Cardiac failure was the main presenting form of endocarditis caused by Bartonella spp. described in our patients. All but one of the patients with B. quintana IE (7/8; 87.5%) presented heart failure and 8/13 (61.5%) of those infected with B. henselae (NYHA class IV: 3/8 (37.5%) of patients with IE due to B. henselae and 5/7 (71.4%) of the patients with B. quintana; NYHA class III: 4/8 (50%) of patients with B. henselae IE and 2/7 (28.6%) of the patients with B. quintana; NYHA class I just one patient (1/8; 12.5%) with B. henselae IE). Fever was recorded in 5/13 (38.5%) of patients infected by B. henselae and 3/8 (37.5%) of patients infected by B. quintana.
Physical examination focusing on cardiac auscultation showed a new regurgitant murmur in 4/13 (30.8%) and 5/8 (62.5%) of patients with B. henselae and B. quintana IE, respectively, while classical clinical signs of endocarditis, such as petechiae, were only observed in one patient of the B. henselae group. Embolisms were observed in 4/13 (30.8%) and 1/8 (12.5%) of patients with B. henselae and B. quintana, respectively, (all of them affecting CNS in the B. quintana group while only one affected this structure in the B. henselae patients). New renal function impairment was observed in four of the 13 patients infected by B. henselae (30.8%) and in 5/8 (62.5%) by B. quintana. Two patients had splenomegaly, one of each group (1/13 (7.7%) of B. henselae and 1/8 (12.5%) of B. quintana). Only one patient with B. henselae IE presented glomerulonephritis (1/13; 7.7%). One patient of the B. quintana group presented a new conduction abnormality (1/8; 12.5%) and one of the B. henselae group had septic shock (1/13; 7.7%).
Echocardiography was performed for all 21 patients: both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) for 9/13 (69.2%) of patients with B. henselae and for 5/8 (62.5%) of patients B. quintana; TTE for 12/13 (92.3%) and 100% patients with B. henselae and B. quintana, respectively and TOE for 10/13 (76.9%) and 5/8 (62.5%) of patients with B. henselae and B. quintana, respectively. Echocardiography showed vegetations in 12/13 (92.3%) and 100% of the patients with B. henselae and B. quintana, respectively. The size of the vegetations was between 5 and 25 mm in patients infected by B. henselae (mean ± SD: 13.8 ± 6.5 mm) and between 7 and 13 mm in those infected by B. quintana (mean ± SD: 10.6 ± 2.2 mm).
The involved valve was the aortic in 18/21 cases (85.7%), although seven of them (7/18; 38.9%) also presented mitral valve involvement. In three patients the unique valve involved was the mitral (3/21; 14.3%). According to the Bartonella spp. implicated, in patients with B. henselae IE, the aortic valve was affected in ten (10/13; 76.9%), three of them also presented mitral valve involvement. In three patients (3/13; 23.7%) the only valve affected was the mitral. Nevertheless, in patients infected by B. quintana the aortic valve was affected in all patients with half of them also presenting mitral valve involvement.
Native valve was affected in all but one (20/21; 95.2%). Prosthetic valve was affected only in one patient infected by B. henselae. Intracardiac complications were observed in 12/21 (57.1%) of the patient (9/13 (69.2%) patients infected by B. henselae and in 3/8 (37.5%) infected by B. quintana): valve perforation was detected in 3/21 (14.3%) of patients of which, two of them were infected by B. henselae (2/13; 15.4%) and one by B. quintana (1/8; 12.5%), pseudoaneurysm in 6/21 (28.6%) of the patients, five of them infected by B. henselae (5/13; 38.5%) and one by B. quintana (1/8; 12.5%), and abscess in four of the B. henselae group (4/13; 30.8%).
Laboratory records showed alterations in C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values. These data are shown in Table 2. Anemia (hemoglobin (Hb) levels < 12.0 g/dL in women and < 13.0 g/dL in men) was observed in ten of the thirteen patients infected with B. henselae (76.9%) and in six of the eight patients infected with B. quintana (75%).
Surgery was performed in 16/21 patients (76.2%). Urgent surgery was performed in three cases (3/16; 18.8%) and emergency surgery in one (1/16; 6.3%).

2.3. Microbiological Diagnosis

Table 3 shows the techniques used for the microbiological diagnosis, the results obtained depending of the applied technique and the coincidence among them. It should be noted that serology was carried out in 17/21 patients (80.9%) and, initially, 6/17 (35.3%) had titers < 800 and 9/17 (53%) had titers ≥ 512. In the five cases in which the diagnosis was only made by serology, either the serologies were positive only for B. henselae while negative for B. quintana, or there was a greater rise in titer for B. henselae (more than three titers).

2.4. Treatment and Outcome

According to European guideliness, the proposed therapy is doxycycline 100 mg/12 h orally for four weeks plus gentamicin (3 mg/24 h) i.v. for two weeks. However, several therapeutic regimens have been reported, including aminopenicillins (ampicillin or amoxicillin, 12 g/24 h i.v.) or cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, 2 g/24 h i.v.) combined with aminoglycosides (gentamicin or netilmicin) [35]. Antimicrobial therapy for each patient is shown in Table 4.
Median days of antibiotic treatment was 49 (range: 42–90). Median days of hospital admission was 41 (IQR: 29–54). Two patients were readmitted (2/21; 9.5%). Neurological or cardiac sequelae (e.g. dysarthria, hemiparesis, hemiplegia, heart failure) were present in three patients (3/21; 14.3%). None of the patients had a relapse. None of the patients died during the hospital stay. Two patients died two and three months after the process in relationship with the IE.

3. Discussion

To date, IE remains a serious disease all over the world, including developed countries. In most cases, Gram-positive cocci are the causative agents but fastidious organisms such as Bartonella spp., Coxiella burnetii, Tropheryma whipplei and others must be considered. In the GAMES cohort, Bartonella spp. is the third most common cause of BCNE behind C. burnetii and T. whipplei [36]. There a few Bartonella series and here we present a new one that is of the most numerous series from a developed country.
The prevalence of Bartonella endocarditis varies among countries. A majority of cases of Bartonella IE have been reported from Europe and the Americas. However, cases from Asia, Africa, and Australia have been also documented, suggesting a worldwide distribution [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. In Europe, Bartonella spp. account for 0–4.5% of the infective endocarditis and 20–30% of BCNE endocarditis [48,49,50,51,52]. In UK Bartonella IE represent 1.1% of IE [53]. However, Bartonella spp. as a causative agent of infective endocarditis reaches 9.8% in Tunisia or even 15.6% in Algeria [39,54]. In Spain, last published data of the GAMES cohort, which included patients recruited beteween 2008 and 2012, estimated that Bartonella spp. were the cause of endocarditis in 0.2% of the cases [6,36]. Here we report the main characteristics of 21 patients affected by Bartonella spp. Taking into account that just 17 of them were from hospitals belonging to the GAMES Cohort, the rate of Bartonella spp. as a causative agent of endocardits recorded in the GAMES Cohort between 2008 and 2020, is 0.3% of the total of IE, and 2% of the BCNE registered. These data are far below those reported in the previously cited series. Nevertheless, the prevalence of Bartonella endocarditis could be underestimated due to the difficulties involved in its identification. Probably, data here do not represent the true incidence of Bartonella IE in our country but in our opinion is the best approximation.
To diagnose endocarditis due to Bartonella spp. is not easy since the clinical presentation is not typical. Fever is not presesent in more than half of the cases and patients usually come to the hospital due to complications such as cardiac failure. This fact is very important since it reinforces the need to request echocardiography in these patients, that is the gold standard for diagnosing endocarditis. Other typical signs such as embolic events are also rare in these patients. However, as in other IE, the existence of previous valve disease is a risk factor for endocarditis due to Bartonella spp. [19]. Preexisting valvular abnormalities are a common condition in patients with Bartonella endocarditis, in more than 40% of the cases, reaching 62.5% of the patients with B. quintana IE. As previously described, results presented here show that the aortic valve is the most affected one, affecting all cases of B. quintana here described and almost 80% of the endocarditis due to B. henselae [19,24,39,43,47,48,52,53,54,55,56,57].
The epidemiology in the cases presented here differs from most series. According to the literature, B. quintana is the causative agent in approximately 75% of all cases, while B. henselae occurs in around 25% of all infective endocarditis cases [47]. However, it is important to note that in the data presented here, B. henselae accounts for almost 62% of the cases while the remaining are due to B. quintana. B. henselae as the main Bartonella spp. causing IE has been only reported in just two other series [43,55].
None of our patients referred body lice contact or an undomiciled/homeless situation and alcohol abuse was observed only in very few cases. These factors, which have been classically associated with B. quintana infection [57], could explain the low prevalence of B. quintana endocarditis in our environment campared with other series such as the French, Tunisian or Algerian ones where the prevalence of B. quintana IE is high [19,39,54]. It should also be noted that, in our series, a not insignificant percentage of patients with B. quintana IE were immigrants. These patients were from Moldavia, Pakistan and Morocco but although they were diagnosed in Barcelona, Spain, the infection most likely happened in their country of origin since two of them had just arrived in Barcelona and, since in the case of the Moroccans, they spent long periods in Morocco. Other classical epidemiological factors such as cat contact, which has been associated with an increased risk of B. henselae infection, is not a prominent factor in our series. Moreover, both species of Bartonella described here affect men more frequently than women and, the age of presentation (49 years) is lower than in the endocarditis caused by the “usual agents“ [6,7] and even lower than in patients with Bartonella IE recorded in the French series [19].
The systematic use of serological and molecular assays in the study of BCNE has improved the diagnosis of this entitity. When Bartonella IE is suspected, it can be diagnosed by blood or valve culture (not very sensitive with the usual techniques), molecular assays such as PCR on blood or excised tissue, that in our series is the most usuful technique, and by serological procedures. Other techniques such as silver nitrate-based staining (Warthin-Starry stain) in affected tissues are also very suggestive [58]. Before the incorparation of molecular techniques, most of the cases of Bartonella endocarditis were diagnosed using serological tests, especially immunofluorescence assay (IFA) that to date are recommended in the guideliness and by experts [35,59]. In the series presented here, it is remarkable that serology has a poor correlation for the diagnosis if the cut-off point recommended in the guideliness is used [35,59]. As previously described [19], we have also observed that 35% of the patients with definitive endocarditis produced by Bartonella spp. confirmed by PCR do not have the recommend cut-off point of IgG ≥ 800 by IFA. In this sense, molecular procedures are likely to become a key tool to improve BCNE diagnostics and contribute to a better understanding of the aetiology [60]. Moreover, the limitations of serological tests should be recognized due to the high level of serological cross-reactions between Bartonella and Chlamydia/Chlamydophila [61] and the difficulty to distinguish between species of Bartonella which further complicates the diagnosis of this type of endocarditis. In the last few years, new methods improving the sensitivity to diagnose Bartonella infections have been described that may be validated for the use in clinical practice, e.g., a method based on a liquid enrichment Bartonella alphaproteobacteria growth medium (BAPGM) followed by PCRs for the amplification of Bartonella spp. [62].
Most of the patients in this series, although in different combinations, had antimicrobial therapy according to guideliness. It is important to emphasize that most of the patients presented here required surgical treatment, perhaps since the diagnosis of Bartonella endocarditis, and in general of BCNE, was later and optimal treatment was not always included early. Mortality due to Bartonella IE in the first descriptions was significant with rates ranging 7 to 30%. However, in recent times mortality rates closer to 7% have been shown, probably due to the improved diagnostic and therapeutic measures [9,47,51,63,64,65,66,67,68]. These data are in agreement with those reported here (mortality rate observed here was 9.4%).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients’ Recruitment

Patients diagnosed with Bartonella IE were recruited from a registry of the “Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis - Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis infecciosa en España (GAMES)”. GAMES is formed by 25 Spanish hospitals that makes a prospective registry including aspects related to IE. Furthermore, four cases from the Vall d´Hebron Hospital (Barcelona), which is not included in the Games Cohort, were also recruited. The necessary data for this study of patients from Vall d´Hebron Hospital were obtain retrospectively from their medical records by their physician. Between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2020, multidisciplinary teams prospectively completed a standardized case report form containing epidemiological, clinical, biological (including main hematological and biochemical values) and therapeutic data for each patient. This case report form was designed to record any type of endocarditis and does not include specific variables for Bartonella endocarditis, therefore, some data of interest for this type of endocarditis, such as contact with cats, fleas, body lice, undomiciled/ homeless situation or history of alcohol abuse (considering alcohol abuse, according to the WHO, the consumption of more than 40 g for men and more than 25 g for women), were retrospectively reviewed from the clinical record of each patient. Due to this information was restricted to what the clinician has entered into the medical records some data could be underestimated. Regional and local ethics committees approved the study (Comité Ético para la Investigación Clínica-Regional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, code: 18/07; Date: 11 January 2008), and patients gave their informed consent for entering the cohort [6].

4.2. Definitions

IE and Bartonella infection as causative agent was defined according to the modified Duke criteria [69]. In our clinical practice a routine protocol that includes serology to Coxiella burnetii, Bartonella spp., Legionella spp. and Brucella spp. was completed in all patients with BCNE. When valve surgery was carried out molecular assays (PCR) or culture were performed. Molecular tests were performed using Bartonella spp. rpoB gene and broad-range 16S rRNA gene and subsequent sequencing [70,71]. Serological studies were carried out in each clinical laboratory included in the study using commercial immunofluorescence assays. Taking into account the possibility of cross-reactions between Bartonella spp., the species was determined based on serological assays if results were positive only for one species or if there was at least a three-fold difference in titer against one species compared to the other one.

4.3. Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 26.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

5. Conclusions

Bartonella IE is not a frequent cause of IE that should be suspected in all patients with BCNE. In these cases, the index of suspicion should be high even if contact with animals has not been reported or there are no risk factors such as body lice parasitization. A serology for Bartonella spp. negative or lower than the recommended cut-off does not exclude the possibility of a Bartonella IE. The prognosis of Bartonella IE was better in this study than in IE due to other causes observed in the Games Cohort [6,10], and involves valve replacement in a high percentage of the cases.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11050561/s1, Investigators of Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis—Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la Endocarditis infecciosa en España (GAMES).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.O.; methodology, L.G.-Á. and J.A.O.; formal analysis, J.A.O. and L.G.-Á.; investigation, J.A.O. and L.G.-Á., resources, L.G.-Á., J.A.O., C.G.-G., P.M., M.d.C.F.-Á., M.G.C., N.F.-H., E.G.-V., E.M.-E., M.d.M.A.-S., D.G.-R., C.H.-T., F.D., J.G.-A.; J.C.G., M.Á.R.-E. and X.B.-G.; GAMES investigators, data curation, L.G.-Á. and J.A.O.; writing—original draft preparation, L.G.-Á. and J.A.O.; writing—review and editing, L.G.-Á., J.A.O. and C.G.-G.; visualization, L.G.-Á., J.A.O., C.G.-G.; P.M., M.d.C.F.-Á., M.G.C., N.F.-H., E.G.-V., E.M.-E., M.d.M.A.-S., D.G.-R., C.H.-T., F.D., J.G.-A., J.C.G., M.Á.R.-E. and X.B.-G.; supervision, J.A.O.; project administration, J.A.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Comité Ético para la Investigación Clínica-Regional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid (code: 18/07; Date: 11 January 2008).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

To Iván Adán, SEICAV coordination.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bin Abdulhak, A.A.; Baddour, L.M.; Erwin, P.J.; Hoen, B.; Chu, V.H.; Mensah, G.A.; Tleyjeh, I.M. Global and Regional Burden of Infective Endocarditis, 1990–2010: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Glob. Heart 2014, 9, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Selton-Suty, C.; Célard, M.; Le Moing, V.; Doco-Lecompte, T.; Chirouze, C.; Iung, B.; Strady, C.; Revest, M.; Vandenesch, F.; Bouvet, A.; et al. Preeminence of Staphylococcus aureus in Infective Endocarditis: A 1-Year Population-Based Survey. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 1230–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Moreillon, P.; Que, Y.A. Infective endocarditis. Lancet 2004, 363, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fernández-Hidalgo, N.; Mas, P.T. Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis in Spain in the Last 20 Years. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. (Engl. Ed.) 2013, 66, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ambrosioni, J.; The Hospital Clinic Infective Endocarditis Investigators; Hernández-Meneses, M.; Téllez, A.; Pericas, J.M.; Falces, C.; Tolosana, J.M.; Vidal, B.; Almela, M.; Quintana, E.; et al. The Changing Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis in the Twenty-First Century. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2017, 19, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Muñoz, P.; Kestler, M.; De Alarcon, A.; Miro, J.M.; Bermejo, J.; Rodríguez-Abella, H.; Fariñas, M.C.; Cobo Belaustegui, M.; Mestres, C.; Llinares, P.; et al. Current Epidemiology and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study. Medicine 2015, 94, e1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Murdoch, D.R.; Corey, G.R.; Hoen, B.; Miró, J.M.; Fowler, V.G., Jr.; Bayer, A.S.; Karchmer, A.W.; Olaison, L.; Pappas, P.A.; Moreillon, P.; et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: The International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Karimzadeh, I.; Heydari, B.; Khalili, H.; Shojaei, E.; Ebrahimi, A. Infective endocarditis; report from a main referral teaching hospital in Iran. Iran J. Pharm. Res. 2017, 16, 390–398. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jomaa, W.; Ben Ali, I.; Abid, D.; Ernez, S.H.; Abid, L.; Triki, F.; Kammoun, S.; Gharbi, A.; Ben Rejeb, O.; Mahdhaoui, A.; et al. Clinical features and prognosis of infective endocarditis in children: Insights from a Tunisian multicentre registry. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 110, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Díez-Villanueva, P.; Muñoz, P.; Marín, M.; Bermejo, J.; González, A.D.A.; Fariñas, M.C.; Gutiérrez-Cuadra, M.; Pericás-Pulido, J.M.; Lepe, J.A.; Castelo, L.; et al. Infective endocarditis: Absence of microbiological diagnosis is an independent predictor of inhospital mortality. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 220, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Genus Bartonella. LPSN. Available online: http://www.bacterio.net/bartonella.html (accessed on 17 March 2022).
  12. Portillo, A.; Maggi, R.; Oteo, J.A.; Bradley, J.; García-Álvarez, L.; San-Martín, M.; Roura, X.; Breitschwerdt, E. Bartonella spp. Prevalence (Serology, Culture, and PCR) in Sanitary Workers in La Rioja Spain. Pathogens 2020, 9, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gandhi, T.N.; Slater, L.N.; Welch, D.F.; Koehler, J.E. Bartonella, including cat-scratch disease. In Mandell, Douglas, And Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 8th ed.; Bennett, J.E., Dolin, R., Blaser, M.J., Eds.; Elsevier Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 2649–2663. [Google Scholar]
  14. Battistini, T.S. Estudios Sobre la Verruga Peruana; La Acción Médica: Lima, Peru, 1929. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vayssier-Taussat, M.; Moutailler, S.; Féménia, F.; Raymond, P.; Croce, O.; La Scola, B.; Fournier, P.E.; Raoult, D. Identification of novel zoonotic activity of Bartonella spp., France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Breitschwerdt, E.B. Bartonellosis: One Health and all creatures great and small. Vet Dermatol. 2017, 28, 96-e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Telford, S.R.; Wormser, G.P. Bartonella spp. Transmission by Ticks Not Established. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koehler, J.E.; Tappero, J.W. Bacillary Angiomatosis and Bacillary Peliosis in Patients Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1993, 17, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Edouard, S.; Nabet, C.; Lepidi, H.; Fournier, P.-E.; Raoult, D. Bartonella, a Common Cause of Endocarditis: A Report on 106 Cases and Review. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 824–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Regnery, R.; Tappero, J. Unraveling mysteries associated with cat-scratch disease, bacillary angiomatosis, and related syndromes. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1995, 1, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chomel, B.B. Cat-scratch disease. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2000, 19, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kram, S.M.; Anwar, M.Y.; Thandra, K.C.; Rawla, P. Bacillary Angiomatosis; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448092/ (accessed on 17 March 2022).
  23. García, J.C.; Núñez, M.J.; Castro, B.; Fernández, J.M.; López, A.; Portillo, A.; Oteo, J.A. Hepatosplenic cat scratch disease in immunocompetent adults: Report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Medicine 2014, 93, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oteo, J.A.; Castilla, A.; Arosey, A.; Blanco, J.R.; Ibarra, V.; Morano, L.E. Endocarditis due to Bartonella spp. Three new clinical cases and Spanish literature review. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2006, 24, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zellali, K.; Benard, E.; Smokvina, E.; Belgaid, A.; Labbé, F.; Bertrand, V. Multifocal pelvic osteomyelitis in a child associated with cat-scratch disease: A case report and review of the literature. Paediatr. Int. Child Heal. 2018, 39, 290–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vanderheyden, T.R.; Yong, S.L.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Maggi, R.G.; Mihalik, A.R.; Parada, J.P.; Fimmel, C.J. Granulomatous hepatitis due to Bartonella henselae infection in an immunocompetent patient. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Daly, J.S.; Worthington, M.G.; Brenner, D.J.; Moss, C.W.; Hollis, D.G.; Weyant, R.S.; Steigerwalt, A.G.; Weaver, R.E.; Daneshvar, M.I.; O’Connor, S.P. Rochalimaea elizabethae sp. nov. isolated from a patient with endocarditis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1993, 31, 872–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Roux, V.; Eykyn, S.J.; Wyllie, S.; Raoult, D. Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii as an agent of afebrile blood culture-negative endocarditis in a human. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1698–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Olarte, L.; Ampofo, K.; Thorell, E.A.; Sanderson, S.; Doby, E.; Pavia, A.T.; Rosado, H.; Raoult, D.; Socolovschi, C.; Hersh, A.L. Bartonella vinsonii Endocarditis in an Adolescent with Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2012, 31, 531–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Fenollar, F.; Sire, S.; Raoult, D. Bartonella vinsonii subsp. arupensis as an agent of blood culture-negative endocarditis in a human. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 945–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Avidor, B.; Graidy, M.; Efrat, G.; Leibowitz, C.; Shapira, G.; Schattner, A.; Zimhony, O.; Giladi, M. Bartonella koehlerae, a New Cat-Associated Agent of Culture-Negative Human Endocarditis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3462–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Raoult, D.; Roblot, F.; Rolain, J.-M.; Besnier, J.-M.; Loulergue, J.; Bastides, F.; Choutet, P. First Isolation of Bartonella alsatica from a Valve of a Patient with Endocarditis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 278–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jeanclaude, D.; Godmer, P.; Leveiller, D.; Pouedras, P.; Fournier, P.-E.; Raoult, D.; Rolain, J.-M. Bartonella alsatica endocarditis in a French patient in close contact with rabbits. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, S110–S111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lin, E.Y.; Tsigrelis, C.; Baddour, L.M.; Lepidi, H.; Rolain, J.-M.; Patel, R.; Raoult, D. Candidatus Bartonella mayotimonensis and Endocarditis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Habib, G.; Lancellotti, P.; Antunes, M.J.; Bongiorni, M.G.; Casalta, J.-P.; Del Zotti, F.; Dulgheru, R.; El Khoury, G.; Erba, P.A.; Iung, B.; et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 3075–3128. [Google Scholar]
  36. Endocarditis con Cultivos Negativos. Available online: https://www.seicav.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/15.30-Jose-A.-Oteo.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2022).
  37. Goldstein, L.H.; Saliba, W.R.; Elias, M.; Zlotnik, A.; Raz, R.; Giladi, M. Bartonella quintana endocarditis in east Africa. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2005, 16, 518–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rolain, J.M.; Bourry, O.; Davoust, B.; Raoult, D. Bartonella quintana and Rickettsia felis in Gabon. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1742–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Znazen, A.; Rolain, J.M.; Hammami, N.; Kammoun, S.; Hammami, A.; Raoult, D. High prevalence of Bartonella quintana endocarditis in Sfax, Tunisia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005, 72, 503–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Woolley, M.W.; Gordon, D.L.; Wetherall, B.L. Analysis of the First Australian Strains of Bartonella quintana Reveals Unique Genotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2040–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lim, M.H.; Chung, D.R.; Kim, W.-S.; Park, K.S.; Ki, C.-S.; Lee, N.Y.; Kim, S.M. First Case of Bartonella quintana Endocarditis in Korea. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2012, 27, 1433–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tasher, D.; Raucher-Sternfeld, A.; Tamir, A.; Giladi, M.; Somekh, E. Bartonella quintana, an Unrecognized Cause of Infective Endocarditis in Children in Ethiopia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 1246–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Nakasu, A.; Ishimine, T.; Yasumoto, H.; Tengan, T.; Mototake, H. Infective endocarditis associated with Bartonella henselae: A case series. IDCases 2018, 12, 127–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Noopetch, P.; Ponpinit, T.; Suankratay, C. Bartonella henselae infective endocarditis with dissemination: A case report and literature review in Southeast Asia. IDCases 2018, 13, e00441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shtaya, A.A.; Perek, S.; Kibari, A.; Cohen, S. Bartonella henselae Endocarditis: An Usual Presentation of an Unusual Disease. Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2019, 6, 001038. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ohno, T.; Saito, S.; Iwata, E.; Ushida, S.; Otsuka, R.; Miyahara, K.; Matsuura, A. Blood culture–negative endocarditis caused by Bartonella henselae: A case report. Indian J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2021, 38, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pecoraro, A.A.; Herbst, P.P.; Pienaar, C.C.; Taljaard, J.J.; Prozesky, H.H.; Janson, J.J.; Doubell, A.A. Bartonella species as a cause of culture-negative endocarditis in South Africa. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 40, 1873–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Houpikian, P.; Raoult, D. Blood culture-negative endocarditis in a reference center: Etiologic diagnosis of 348 cases. Medicine 2005, 84, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fournier, P.E.; Thuny, F.; Richet, H.; Lepidi, H.; Casalta, J.P.; Arzouni, J.P.; Maurin, M.; Célard, M.; Mainardi, J.L.; Caus, T.; et al. Comprehensive diagnostic strategy for blood culture-negative endocarditis: A prospective study of 819 new cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 51, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Brouqui, P.; Raoult, D. New insight into the diagnosis of fastidious bacterial endocarditis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 47, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Werner, M.; Andersson, R.; Olaison, L.; Hogevik, H. A clinical study of culture-negative endocarditis. Medicine 2003, 82, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raoult, D.; Fournier, P.E.; Drancourt, M.; Marrie, T.J.; Etienne, J.; Cosserat, J.; Cacoub, P.; Poinsignon, Y.; Leclercq, P.; Sefton, A.M. Diagnosis of 22 new cases of Bartonella endocarditis. Ann. Intern. Med. 1996, 125, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lamas, C.C.; Eykyn, S.J. Blood culture negative endocarditis: Analysis of 63 cases presenting over 25 years. Heart 2003, 89, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Benslimani, A.; Fenollar, F.; Lepidi, H.; Raoult, D. Bacterial zoonoses and infective endocarditis, Algeria. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ding, F.; Shrestha, N.K.; Chetrit, M.; Verma, B.; Gordon, S.; Pettersson, G.B.; Unai, S.; Griffin, B.P.; Xu, B. Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics of Bartonella Infective Endocarditis: An 8-Year Single-Centre Experience in the United States. Hear. Lung Circ. 2021, 31, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ghidey, F.Y.; Igbinosa, O.; Mills, K.; Lai, L.; Woods, C.; Ruiz, M.E.; Fishbein, D.; Sampath, R.; Lowery, R.; Wortmann, G. Case series of Bartonella quintana blood culture-negative endocarditis in Washington, DC. JMM Case Rep. 2016, 3, e005049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fournier, P.E.; Lelievre, H.; Eykyn, S.J.; Mainardi, J.L.; Marrie, T.J.; Bruneel, F.; Roure, C.; Nash, J.; Clave, D.; James, E.; et al. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of Bartonella quintana and Bartonella henselae endocarditis: A study of 48 patients. Medicine 2001, 80, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brouqui, P.; Raoult, D. Endocarditis Due to Rare and Fastidious Bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 177–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Baddour, L.M.; Wilson, W.R.; Bayer, A.S.; Fowler, V.G., Jr.; Tleyjeh, I.M.; Rybak, M.J.; Bolger, A.; Levison, M.E.; Ferrieri, P.; Gerber, M.; et al. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 132, 1435–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Godfrey, R.; Curtis, S.; Schilling, W.H.; James, P.R. Blood culture negative endocarditis in the modern era of 16S rRNA sequencing. Clin. Med. (Lond.) 2020, 20, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Maurin, M.; Eb, F.; Etienne, J.; Raoult, D. Serological cross-reactions between Bartonella and Chlamydia species: Implications for diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 2283–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Oteo, J.A.; Maggi, R.; Portillo, A.; Bradley, J.; García-Álvarez, L.; San-Martín, M.; Roura, X.; Breitschwerdt, E. Prevalence of Bartonella spp. by culture, PCR and serology, in veterinary personnel from Spain. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Pesanti, E.L.; Smith, I.M. Infective endocarditis with negative blood cultures: An analysis of 52 cases. Am. J. Med. 1979, 66, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hoen, B.; Selton-Suty, C.; Lacassin, F.; Etienne, J.; Briançon, S.; Leport, C.; Canton, P. Infective Endocarditis in Patients with Negative Blood Cultures: Analysis of 88 Cases from a One-Year Nationwide Survey in France. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1995, 20, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Werner, M.; Fournier, P.-E.; Andersson, R.; Hogevik, H.; Raoult, D. Bartonella and Coxiella Antibodies in 334 Prospectively Studied Episodes of Infective Endocarditis in Sweden. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 35, 724–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Raoult, D.; Fournier, P.-E.; Vandenesch, F.; Mainardi, J.-L.; Eykyn, S.J.; Nash, J.; James, E.; Benoit-Lemercier, C.; Marrie, T.J. Outcome and Treatment of Bartonella Endocarditis. Arch. Intern. Med. 2003, 163, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Albrich, W.C.; Kraft, C.; Fisk, T.; Albrecht, H. A mechanic with a bad valve: Blood-culture-negative endocarditis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2004, 4, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Houpikian, P.; Raoult, D. Western Immunoblotting for Bartonella Endocarditis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2003, 10, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Li, J.S.; Sexton, D.J.; Mick, N.; Nettles, R.; Fowler, V.G., Jr.; Ryan, T.; Bashore, T.; Gorey, G.R. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 30, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Renesto, P.; Gouvernet, J.; Drancourt, M.; Roux, V.; Raoult, D. Use of rpoB Gene Analysis for Detection and Identification of Bartonella Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. Main epidemiological, clinical, and outcome characteristics of the patients with Bartonella spp. Endocarditis.
Table 1. Main epidemiological, clinical, and outcome characteristics of the patients with Bartonella spp. Endocarditis.
Bartonella henselae IEBartonella quintana IETotal
Nº patients13821
Age median (IQR)55 (42–58)42 (34.5–61.5)49 (40–59)
Male7 (53.8%)6 (75%)13 (61.9%)
Previous heart disease 69.2%62.5%66.7%
Alcohol abuse7.7%25%14.3%
Cats/Fleas/Body lice contact38.5%37.5%38%
Median age-adjusted
Charlson comorbidity index (IQR)
2 (1–4)0 (0–2.5)1 (0.5–4.5)
Affected valve/s
Aortic/Mitroaortic
76.9%/23.7%100%/50%85.7%/38.9%
Cardiac failure61.5%87.5%66.7%
Fever38.5%37.5%42.8%
Mean vegetations size (mm) ±SD13.8 ± 6.510.6 ± 2.212.7 ± 5.6
Intracardiac complications69.2%37.5%57.1%
Surgery61.5%100%76.2%
Anemia76.9%75%76.2%
Median duration of antimicrobial therapy (IQR)46 (42–92)70.5 (42–110)49 (42–103)
Days of hospital admission median (IQR)40 (28–52.5)43 (38.5–55.5)41 (28.5–54.5)
Sequelae15.4%12.5%14.3%
Relapse000
Death (1st year)2 (15.4%)02 (9.5%)
IE, infective endocarditis; IQR, interquartile range.
Table 2. Epidemiological, clinical, and outcome characteristics of the 21 patients.
Table 2. Epidemiological, clinical, and outcome characteristics of the 21 patients.
Patient Id.123456789101112131415161718192021
Bartonella spp.BHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBHBQBQBQBQBQBQBQ * BQ
Age 425844408288594757574055403335722866604935
SexFMMFFFMFMMMFMFMMMMMFM
Country of residenceSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainMoroccoSpainSpainSpainSpainSpainMoldovaMoroccoPakistan
Year of diagnosis201420172010201220182010201320192019201820202021201420122016201320192009201120182016
MalignanciesNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Previous heart disease YNNYYNYYNYYYYYNYNYNYY
Alcohol abuseNNYNNNNNNNNNNYYNNNNNN
Other historical conditionsCTD, ITCLD, HT, HL, VDRFI, HD, PUHT, IT, CTD, RFICLD, DM, HT, CD, HLHT, CVDNNCDDM, HT, HLNCTDHT, CVD, TA.NNDM, HT, HL, VD, RFI.NHT, HL, RFIHLNN
Cats/Fleas/Body lice contactYYNNYNNYNNNYNDYNNYNYNDND
Age-adjusted charlson comorbidity index135475101212110709200
ETE/ETTBOTHBOTHBOTHBOTHTOETTEBOTHTTEBOTHBOTHTTEBOTHBOTHTTEBOTHBOTHTTEBOTHBOTHBOTHTTE
Affected valve/sAOAOAO-MITAOMITAO-MITMITAOMITAOAO-MITAOAOAO-MITAO-MITAOAOAOAO-MITAO-MITAO
Vegetations size (mm)9125NV8152525ND12ND1017NDND12ND137129
Cardiac failure (NHYA)NY(III)NY(III)NY(I)NY(III)Y(III)Y(IV)Y(IV)NY(IV)NOY(III)Y(IV)Y(III)Y(IV)Y(IV)Y(IV)Y(IV)
FeverNNYYYYYNNNNNYNNYNNYYN
Intracardiac complicationsNNYYYYNYYYNYYNYNNNYYN
EmbolismsYNNNNYNNYYNNNNYNNNNNN
SurgeryYYYYNNNYYNNYYYYYYYYYY
CRP (mg/L) **1.557.55.610831.420.9ND11517011NDND181ND4.449NDND7.8
ESR (mm/h)44141ND3213NDNDND25NDNDND120NDNDND120123118NDND
AST/ALT (U/L)115/20817/1219/830/2623/16UNK102/10720/1932/6134/3033/2518/834/3015/1640/352387/222434/1968/1017/1610/514/11
Microbiological diagnosisSER/ PCRSER/ PCRSERSER/ PCRSERSERSERPCRSERSER/ PCRSER/ PCRSER/ PCRPCRPCRSER/ PCRPCRPCRSER/ PCRSER/ PCRSER/ PCRSER/ PCR
Antimicrobial
Duration (days)
20742353511646425842684246123491982535519090130
Days of hospital admission40283479547513454282823573856552956394541
SequelaeNNNNYNNNYNNNNNYNNNNNN
OutcomeAAAD (IE RELATED)D (IE RELATED)D (IE NOT RELATED)AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
BH, Bartonella henselae; BQ, Bartonella quintana; F, female; M, male; N, no; Y, yes; CTD, connective tissue disease; CLD, chronic lung disease; HT, hypertension; HL, hyperlipidemia; VD, vascular disease; RFI, renal function impairment; HD, hepatic disease; PU, peptic ulcer; IT, immunosuppressive therapy; DM, diabetes mellitus; CD, coronary disease; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; TA, tuberculous adenitis; ND, not documented; TOE, transesophageal echocardiography; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; AO, aortic valve; MIT, mitral valve; NV, not vegetation; NHYA, New York Heart Association; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; SER, serology; PCR, polymerase chain reaction A, alive; D, death. * SAMS coinfection; ** Highest value during the episode.
Table 3. Microbiological diagnosis.
Table 3. Microbiological diagnosis.
Microbiological TechniqueN (%)B. henselaeB. quintana
Blood culture101
PCR
Blood
Valve/vegetation
Blood and valve
16 (76.2)
2 (9.5)
16 (76.2)
2 (9.5)
8
1
8
1
8
1
8
1
Serology a17 (80.9)115
More than one technique12 (57.1)66
Only culture
Only PCR
Only serology
Culture and PCR
Culture and serology
PCR and serology
Culture, PCR and serology
-
3 (14.2)
5 (23.8)
1 (4.8)
-
11 (52.4)
-
-
2
5
-
-
6
-
-
1
-
1
-
5
-
Coincidences11 (52.4)65
PCR: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR). a Anti-Bartonella spp. IgG ≥ 1/800 (IFA).
Table 4. Antimicrobial regimens used.
Table 4. Antimicrobial regimens used.
Patient Id.Antimicrobials
1Gentamicin + Ceftriaxone/Gentamicin + Doxycycline
2Ampicillin + Cloxacillin + Gentamicin/Gentamicin + Doxycycline
3Ciprofloxacin/Vancomycin + Gentamicin
4Gentamicin + Doxycycline
5Gentamicin + Daptomycin + Doxycycline/Daptomycin + Ceftriaxone
6Gentamicin + Cloxacillin + Ampicillin/Ceftriaxone
7Ampicillin + Gentamicin + Cloxacillin/Ampicillin + Cloxacillin + Ceftriaxone
8Gentamicin + Daptmycine + Ceftriaxone/Doxycycline
9Ampicillin + Cloxacillin + Ceftriaxone/Doxycycline + Imipenem/Gentamicin + Doxycycline + Rifampicin
10Ceftriaxone + Gentamicin/Doxycycline
11Ceftriaxone + Daptomycine + Cloxacillin/Doxycycline + Rifampicin
12Ampicillin + Ceftriaxone + Cloxacillin/Ceftriaxone + Gentamicin + Doxycycline
13Ampicillin + Ceftriaxone/ Doxycycline
14Ceftriaxone + Doxycycline + Gentamicin
15Ceftriaxone + Gentamicin/Cloxacillin + Ampicillin/Rifampicin + Doxycycline + Gentamicin
16Ampicillin + Cloxacillin + Gentamicine/Daptomycin
17Ceftriaxone + Ampicillin + Cloxacillin/Gentamicin + Doxycycline
18Ampicillin + Gentamicin/Daptomycin + Ceftriaxone + Levofloxacin/Gentamicin + Rifampicin + Doxycycline
19Ceftriaxone/Penicillin + Gentamicin/Doxycycline
20Doxycycline
21Ceftriaxone/Doxycycline
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Álvarez, L.; García-García, C.; Muñoz, P.; Fariñas-Álvarez, M.d.C.; Cuadra, M.G.; Fernández-Hidalgo, N.; García-Vázquez, E.; Moral-Escudero, E.; Alonso-Socas, M.d.M.; García-Rosado, D.; et al. Bartonella Endocarditis in Spain: Case Reports of 21 Cases. Pathogens 2022, 11, 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050561

AMA Style

García-Álvarez L, García-García C, Muñoz P, Fariñas-Álvarez MdC, Cuadra MG, Fernández-Hidalgo N, García-Vázquez E, Moral-Escudero E, Alonso-Socas MdM, García-Rosado D, et al. Bartonella Endocarditis in Spain: Case Reports of 21 Cases. Pathogens. 2022; 11(5):561. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050561

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Álvarez, Lara, Concepción García-García, Patricia Muñoz, María del Carmen Fariñas-Álvarez, Manuel Gutiérrez Cuadra, Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo, Elisa García-Vázquez, Encarnación Moral-Escudero, María del Mar Alonso-Socas, Dácil García-Rosado, and et al. 2022. "Bartonella Endocarditis in Spain: Case Reports of 21 Cases" Pathogens 11, no. 5: 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11050561

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop