Next Article in Journal
A Modular Hepatitis E Virus Replicon System for Studies on the Role of ORF1-Encoded Polyprotein Domains
Next Article in Special Issue
Polymorphic Molecular Signatures in Variable Regions of the Plasmodium falciparum var2csa DBL3x Domain Are Associated with Virulence in Placental Malaria
Previous Article in Journal
Addressing the Data Gaps on Child and Adolescent Tuberculosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
HIF-α Activation Impacts Macrophage Function during Murine Leishmania major Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Parasitic Infections in Internationally Adopted Children: A Twelve-Year Retrospective Study

1
Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Anna Meyer Children’s University Hospital, 50100 Florence, Italy
2
Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50100 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(3), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11030354
Submission received: 15 December 2021 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 11 March 2022 / Published: 15 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biology of Parasitism)

Abstract

:
Parasitic infections (PIs) are among the most frequent infectious diseases globally. Previous studies reported discrepant results regarding the prevalence of PIs in internationally adopted children (IAC). Data from IAC referred to our paediatric university hospital in 2009–2021 were collected to evaluate the frequency of PIs by the use of stool microscopic examination, antigen assays for Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum, and serological tests for Toxocara canis, Strongyloides stercoralis, Schistosoma mansoni, Echinococcus spp., Taenia solium, and Trypanosoma cruzi. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for PIs and eosinophilia. The proportion of IAC with at least one positive test was 26.83% (640/2385); 2.13% (n = 51) had positive tests for 2 or 3 parasites. A positive assay for helminthic infection was retrieved in 11.07% of children (n = 264), and 17.86% (n = 426) presented with eosinophilia. The most common positive tests were anti-Toxocara canis antibodies (n = 312; 13.8%), followed by positive stool antigen for Giardia lamblia (n = 290; 12.16%), and positive microscopic stool examination for Blastocystis hominis (n = 76; 3.19%). A statistically significant association was found between PIs and region of origin (children from Latin America and Africa were more likely to present PIs than children from Eastern Europe), age 5–14 years, and eosinophilia. No significant association was observed between PIs and gender, vitamin D deficiency, or anemia. In conclusion, PIs are relevant in IAC and an accurate protocol is needed to evaluate IAC once they arrive in their adoptive country.

1. Introduction

Parasitic infections (PIs) are among the most frequent infectious diseases globally [1]. These ‘neglected tropical diseases’ generally harbour deplorable hygienic conditions and unfavourable social and climatic conditions [1,2]. Unfortunately, internationally adopted children (IAC) are a population that is often hit by this spectrum of conditions and, therefore, must be carefully assessed.
In Italy, around 2000 children are adopted by Italian families every year, with Tuscany ranking second after Lombardy [3]. However, the characteristics of the population of IAC are difficult to define: extraordinarily diverse and heterogeneous, often coming from deprived contexts and countries where several infections are endemic [4].
It is crucial to assess the health state of IAC once they arrive in their adoptive country. Preadoptive records are often scarcely reliable, and children often declared healthy in their region of origin might be affected by several diseases [5]. The immunisation status is often uncertain. Moreover, they have often lived in orphanages or other centres that can increase the risk of infectious diseases [5,6]. Therefore, it is important to diagnose possible morbidities, infectious and not, that can seriously impact the child’s health [7,8].
In previous studies, the reported PI prevalence greatly varied ranging between 9% and 72% [1,9,10,11]. In general, a trend toward a higher prevalence may be observed in studies dating back 10 years or less [1,9], with respect to the older ones [10,11]; improvements in diagnostic techniques over time can partially explain these differences.
The starting point of the assessment should be the screening of the child’s health [1,5]. In our centre, according to the guideline recommendations [5], IAC routinely undergo serology testing for the most common parasites, microscopic stool examinations, and stool assays for Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum antigens [12]. Additional tests may be performed in patients with an increased risk for peculiar conditions, such as serologic testing for Chagas, schistosomiasis, or filariasis. We previously reported that PIs are the most frequent infectious diseases diagnosed in IAC, followed by skin infections and latent or active tuberculosis [12,13].
The management of IAC lacks evidence-based guidelines and fails to cover the entirety of the conditions that might affect the population [14]. Eosinophilia can be linked to parasitosis [15,16]. Other clinical conditions possibly associated with PIs include malnutrition, anemia, and vitamin D deficiency [17,18,19].
It is essential to detect possible parasitosis as soon as possible, in order to avoid severe long-term consequences, such as growth and developmental delays, and behavioural problems [20,21,22,23]. Moreover, in the current literature, there are insufficient or contrasting data regarding the prevalence of the PIs in IAC according to their birth countries or age [1]. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of and possible risk factors for PIs in a large cohort of IAC.

2. Results

In the study period, 2385 IAC were enrolled. Overall, 1420 (59.5%) children were male, median age was 5.78 years (95%CI: 3.28–8.17). The majority of the children originated from Eastern Europe (40.04%), followed by Latin America (22.18%), Asia (20.63%), and Africa (17.15%). In particular, the most common countries of origin were Russia (n = 534; 22.39%), Colombia (n = 187; 7.84%), India (n = 182; 7.63%), Ethiopia (n = 163; 6.83%), Hungary (n = 133; 5.58%), Vietnam (n = 112; 4.70%), Brazil (n = 108; 4.53%), Congo (n = 96; 4.03%), and Chile (n = 90; 3.77%).
The majority of the children were between 1 and 9 years of age, representing 89% of the study population; among them, 984 IAC (41.26%) had Vitamin D deficiency; eosinophilia was found in 17.86% (n = 426) of the children (Table 1).
Overall, 640 (26.83%) IAC tested positive for a least one parasite, including 48 (2.01%) children with positive tests for 2 parasites, and 3 (0.12%) children positive for 3 parasites. A positive assay for helminthic infection was retrieved in 11.07% of children (n = 264).
The most common positive tests were anti-Toxocara canis antibodies (n = 312; 16.44%), followed by positive stool antigen for Giardia lamblia (n = 290; 12.16%) and positive microscopic stool examination for Blastocystis hominis (n = 76; 3.19%) (Table 2).
Positive tests for PIs were more frequently observed in children aged 5 to 14 years (p < 0.0001) (Table 3). A positive serologic test for Toxocara canis was the most common positive assay in all age groups, except for the children between 1 to 4 years of age for whom a Giardia lamblia positive test was the most frequent positive assay (14.12%) (Table 3).
Latin America was the region of origin with the highest percentage of positive tests for parasites (185/529; 34.97%; p < 0.0001 vs. Eastern Europe), followed by Africa (126/409; 30.81%; p < 0.0001 vs. Eastern Europe), Asia (125/492; 25.41% p = 0.112 vs. Eastern Europe) and Eastern Europe (204/955; 21.36%) (Table 4; Table S1).
At univariate and multivariate analyses, factors significantly associated with a positive assay for parasites were eosinophilia (p < 0.0001), age groups of 5–9 years (p < 0.0001) and 10–14 years (p = 0.028), and origin from Africa or Latin America (p < 0.0001 vs. Eastern Europe) (Table S1). We observed that a higher risk for a positive test for parasites was present in IAC with severe eosinophilia, compared with those with mild eosinophilia (Table S1). Gender, vitamin D levels, and anemia were not significantly associated with a positive assay for parasites.
Analysis exploring the risk factors for eosinophilia confirmed a significant association with a positive test for parasites (OR: 2.04; 95%CI: 1.63–2.53; p < 0.0001), and an increased risk in children originating from Latin America (p = 0.038 vs. Eastern Europe) or Asia (p < 0.001 vs. Eastern Europe) (Table 3). In particular, IAC with a positive test for helminths (OR: 2.06; 95%CI: 1.39–3.05; p < 0.0001) or those with positive tests for both helminths and protozoa (OR: 2.74; 95%CI:1.45–5.02; p = 0.001) were more likely to present eosinophilia than children with no positive test or those positive only for protozoa (Table S2).

3. Discussion

In the present study, 2385 IAC referred to one university centre were prospectively enrolled from 2009 to 2021. A positive test for parasites was observed in 26% of the study children, and 17.86% of the study children had eosinophilia, whose correlation with parasitic infections has been proven by multiple studies [1,10,16].
The most common positive tests were specific IgG anti-Toxocara canis (n = 312; 16.44%), followed by positive stool antigen for Giardia lamblia (n = 290; 12.16%), and positive microscopic stool examination for Blastocystis hominis (n = 76; 3.19%).
A statistically significant association was found between PIs and region of origin (children from Latin America or Africa were more likely to present a positive test than children from Eastern Europe or Asia), age in the range of 5–14 years, and eosinophilia. The risk increased, as the eosinophilia was more severe. No significant association was observed between the prevalence of PIs and gender, vitamin D deficiency, and anemia.
The previously reported prevalence of PIs in IAC ranges greatly, depending on the age of the child and country of origin. In one of the largest studies, at least one intestinal parasite was detected in 27% of 1042 IAC [11], while in a large French study, the prevalence reached 35% [24].
In other observational studies, the rates of recovery of parasites ranged from 9% to over 70% [24,25,26,27,28,29].
The prevalence was similar in children with and without gastrointestinal symptoms and with and without malnutrition. In most studies, giardiasis was the most commonly identified parasitic infection, with as many as 19 percent of children infected [24,25,26,27,28,29]. Helminthic infections are less common (<3 percent), with Hymenolepis species, Ascaris lumbricoides, and Trichuris trichiura most often reported.
Different population characteristics and used laboratory techniques partially explain the different prevalence of parasites reported by several studies. In agreement with other studies, a statistically significant relation between anemia and PIs was not observed in our study [1,10,11]. This lack of association could be due to the type of PIs observed among our study children, since helminthic infections, which are more commonly associated with intestinal bleeding and anemia [1], were a minority of PIs on our dataset.
Other authors reported that the PI prevalence was similar in children with and without gastrointestinal symptoms [10], with and without malnutrition [10], or anemia [1], suggesting that the decision to screen for intestinal parasites should not be based upon symptoms or nutritional status of IAC.
Our results confirm that not all PIs are associated with eosinophilia. Although an increase in peripheral blood count is more frequently associated with helminthic infections [30,31,32,33], this usually occurs when the parasite invades the host’s tissues. Widespread parasitosis such as Giardia lamblia infection, which our study reported affecting 12.6% of the IAC, are intraluminal and, therefore, are not associated with eosinophilia [1]. On the other hand, in IAC the risk of PIs is substantial, as only 14.6% of children with eosinophilia had all the test negative. Accordingly, given this high risk, some authors have suggested starting a presumptive treatment with albendazole in IAC with eosinophilia despite negative parasitic test results [10].
One of the limitations of our study is its retrospective study design. Moreover, a positive serologic result may not always correspond to a PI actually present at the moment of the investigation and results should be interpreted cautiously. Finally, the analyses were performed considering regions of origin and not every country, since the numbers were too dispersed in small subgroups to carry out the analyses by country of origin. Morevoer, the considered regions were very extensive and had a great diversity of eco-epidemiological scenarios.
In conclusion, our study found the prevalence of PIs to be relevant in IAC, especially in those aged 5–14 years and originating from Africa or Latin America. A protocol including both a parasitological exam and serologic testing is needed to evaluate IAC once they arrive in their adoptive country.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design

This retrospective study was performed at the Anna Meyer Children’s University Hospital in Florence, enrolling all the IAC <18 years old (originating from any foreign region of origin), who underwent the internal operative protocol for the first screening in a 12-year period (January 2009 to December 2021), as previously described [5]. Children adopted from Italy were excluded from the study. The screening was offered to Tuscan adoptive families who were referred to the Centre for the Internationally Adopted Child and consented to the evaluation.

4.2. Data Collection

Data were prospectively collected and entered into an electronic database following international standards for data protection, including a precise review of all the following documentation presented during the first visit: family and personal medical history, immunisation status, the results of laboratory tests, and a clinical evaluation. The following data were entered into the database and analysed:
  • Gender, age, and region of origin;
  • Serum vitamin D concentration;
  • Haemoglobin serum level (g/L);
  • Eosinophil blood cell count (cell/µL);
  • Results of parasitic stool examination;
  • Results of antigen assays for Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum on stool samples;
  • Results from serological investigations for Toxocara canis, Strongyloides stercoralis, Schistosoma mansoni, Echinococcus granulosus, Taenia solium, Trypanosoma cruzi, performed in children at high risk of infection, according to their area of origin.

4.3. Laboratory Investigations

During the first evaluation, all the children underwent a venipuncture and laboratory assessment. All the laboratory examinations were executed in the same laboratory, following standardised techniques.

4.4. Samples Collection

Three stool samples were collected on alternate days in the lapse of 10 days.
The enrolled children and their parents received appropriate information regarding the correct procedure for faecal samples collection. Subsequently, they were asked to fill stool transport vials ParaPak EcoFix (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) containing fixative medium, with faecal samples. Each sample was placed on a different vial and preserved at 4 °C until their transport to the laboratory. Microscopic analysis of the faecal material was performed daily.

4.5. Coproparasitological Test

Microscopic analysis for enteric protozoan cysts and/or trophozoites was performed according to the standardised procedures with the following methods: Concentration of samples—each faecal sample was concentrated by means of the commercial filter SpinCon (Meridian Biosciences, Cincinnati, OH, USA), which employs passive filtration and centrifugation through a series of two screens with successively smaller mesh. For the process of filtration 3 mL of surfactant treated, preserved stool specimens were manually transferred from their transport vials to the device for filtration. The surfactant consented to break down faecal aggregates, thus helping to release the parasites. This was followed by the physical blending of faecal material and the addition of 2 mL of physiological saline (for a total of approximately 5 mL diluted, filtered stool), to facilitate the concentration process. The faecal samples were then centrifuged at 500× g for 10 min, and the supernatant was eventually discarded into a suitable biohazard receptacle, thus producing a small pellet of a concentrated sample, which was examined microscopically for the presence of parasites. Direct microscopic analysis with extemporary staining was carried out, during which a small quantity of faecal material (about 2 mg) was diluted on a glass slide with Lugol’s iodine solution 1% (containing iodine crystals 2 g, potassium iodide 2 g, and distilled water 100 mL) stabilised with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PvPP). The specimen was then analysed using a low-power lens (10×) and low-intensity light by means of Kohler lighting. The ambiguous samples were further observed at 40×. Antigen detection was performed by immunochromatographic test (Stick Crypto/Giardia; Operon®, Zaragoza, Spain) according to the manufacturer’s instructions

4.6. Serological Investigations

Serum samples were tested for specific antibodies using commercial immunoenzymatic assays according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serologic tests were performed to detect specific IgG antibodies (Toxocara canis, Strongyloides stercoralis, Schistosoma mansoni, Echinococcus granulosus, Taenia solium, and Trypanosoma cruzi). For the diagnosis of Toxocara canis, an additional Western blot serology was performed when the result of the serologic testing was uncertain. A single ELISA test was used for several infections (‘Filariasis ELISA kit’, Bordier Affinity Products SA, Crissier, Switzerland, for filariasis; ‘Schistosoma mansoni ELISA kit’, Bordier Affinity Products SA, for schistosomiasis; ‘Strongyloidiasis ELISA kit’ based on Strongyloides Ratti antigens, Bordier Affinity Products SA, for Stronglyloides; and ‘DRG Toxocara canis ELISA’, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany, for toxocariasis). The qualitative presence of antibodies for Trypanosoma cruzi (the aetiological agent of Chagas disease) was tested employing two ELISAs, one based on recombinant antigens (‘BioELISA Chagas’, Biokit, Lliça d’Almunt, Spain), the other based on crude antigens (‘BioELISA Chagas III’, BiosChile, Santiago, Chile) [33].

4.7. Definitions

Eosinophilia was defined as the elevation of eosinophil blood cell count (>500 cell/μL). Severe eosinophilia was defined as the elevation of eosinophil blood cell count >1000 cell/μL) [1].
Pathogenic/nonpathogenic parasites. Parasites were furtherly classified as pathogenic and nonpathogenic, according to the literature data [1,11]. Only pathogenic or potentially pathogenic parasites were evaluated.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR) or absolute numbers and percentages. All continuous variables were not normally distributed; thus, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test was used to compare groups. Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, as appropriate. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between clinical and laboratory variables among groups (children with eosinophilia vs. children without eosinophilia; children with PIs (pathogenic, based on the results of the stool examination and serologic testing) vs. children with no infection; children with PIs (only pathogenic) vs. other enrolled children). Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (ICs), were estimated by performing, respectively, simple and multivariate logistic regression analyses. All variables that resulted from significant univariate analyses or were judged clinically relevant were included in the multivariate model.
All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS (Statistical Package of Social Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows software program version 27.0. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11030354/s1, Table S1: Univariate and Multivariate Analyses for risk factors for parasitic infections in the study population; Table S2: Univariate and Multivariate analyses for risk factors for a positive test result for at least one pathogen parasite.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.C. and T.P.; methodology, E.C., T.P., M.B.; software, E.C.; validation, L.G. and E.C.; formal analysis, E.C. and T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, T.P. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, E.C. and L.G.; supervision, E.C.; funding acquisition, E.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Meyer Children’s Hospital, with the code SCR-ADOT on 20/10/2020. All parents or guardians gave written informed consent for the participation of each child before the beginning of the study, according to the Italian legislation.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study at the first visit.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Buonsenso, D.; Graffeo, R.; Scarlato, L.; Acampora, A.; Grotti, G.; Scarlato, L.; Pata, D.; Colonna, A.T.; Salerno, G.; Colussi, L.; et al. Intestinal Parasitic Infections in Internationally Adopted Children: A 10-Year Retrospective Study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2019, 38, 983–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Momčilović, S.; Cantacessi, C.; Arsić-Arsenijević, V.; Otranto, D.; Tasić-Otašević, S. Rapid diagnosis of parasitic diseases: Current scenario and future needs. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 25, 290–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Commissione per le Adozioni. Dati e Prospettive Nelle Adozioni Internazionali. Summary Report CAI 2018. 2019. Available online: www.glnbi.org (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  4. Cataldo, F.; Accomando, S.; Porcari, V. Internationally adopted children: A new challenge for pediatricians. Minerva Pediatr. 2006, 58, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Chiappini, E.; Bortone, B.; Borgi, S.; Sollai, S.; Matucci, T.; Galli, L.; de Martino, M. Infectious Diseases in Internationally Adopted Children and Intercountry Discrepancies Among Screening Protocols, a Narrative Review. Front. Pediatr. 2019, 7, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. De Martino, M.; Galli, L.; Chiappini, E. The internationally adopted child: Overview of challenging issues. Acta Paediatr. 2019, 108, 396–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Del Brutto, O.H. Neurocysticercosis. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2014, 121, 1445–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chifunda, K.; Kelly, P. Parasitic infections of the gut in children. Paediatr. Int. Child Health 2019, 39, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miller, L.C.; Tseng, B.; Tirella, L.G.; Chan, W.; Feig, E. Health of children adopted from Ethiopia. Matern. Child Health J. 2008, 12, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hostetter, M.K.; Iverson, S.; Thomas, W.; McKenzie, D.; Dole, K.; Johnson, D.E. Medical evaluation of internationally adopted children. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 325, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Staat, M.A.; Rice, M.; Donauer, S.; Mukkada, S.; Holloway, M.; Cassedy, A.; Kelley, J.; Salisbury, S. Intestinal parasite screening in internationally adopted children: Importance of multiple stool specimens. Pediatrics 2011, 128, e613–e622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sollai, S.; Ghetti, F.; Bianchi, L.; de Martino, M.; Galli, L.; Chiappini, E. Infectious diseases prevalence, vaccination coverage, and diagnostic challenges in a population of internationally adopted children referred to a Tertiary Care Children’s Hospital from 2009 to 2015. Medicine 2017, 96, e6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Totaro, C.; Bortone, B.; Putignano, P.; Sollai, S.; Galli, L.; de Martino, M.; Chiappini, E. Internationally adopted children: Not only infectious diseases! J. Travel. Med. 2018, 25, tay036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alimenti, C.M.; Bechini, A.; Boccalini, S.; Bonanni, P.; Galli, L.; Chiappini, E. Discrepancies between Protocols of Immunization Targeting Internationally Adopted Children in Western Countries. Vaccines 2020, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Burris, D.; Rosenberg, C.E.; Schwartz, J.T.; Zhang, Y.; Eby, M.D.; Abonia, J.P.; Fulkerson, P.C. Pediatric Hypereosinophilia: Characteristics, Clinical Manifestations, and Diagnoses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 2750–2758.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schulte, C.; Krebs, B.; Jelinek, T.; Nothdurft, H.D.; von Sonnenburg, F.; Löscher, T. Diagnostic significance of blood eosinophilia in returning travelers. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 34, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bechir, M.; Schelling, E.; Hamit, M.A.; Tanner, M.; Zinsstag, J. Parasitic infections, anemia and malnutrition among rural settled and mobile pastoralist mothers and their children in Chad. Ecohealth 2012, 9, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. McClure, E.M.; Meshnick, S.R.; Mungai, P.; Malhotra, I.; King, C.L.; Goldenberg, R.L.; Hudgens, M.G.; Siega-Riz, A.M.; Dent, A.E. The association of parasitic infections in pregnancy and maternal and fetal anemia: A cohort study in coastal Kenya. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Din, Z.U.; Pervez, L.; Amir, A.; Abbas, M.; Khan, I.; Iqbal, Z.; Iqbal, M. Parasitic infections, malnutrition and anemia among preschool children living in rural areas of Peshawar, Pakistan. Nutr. Hosp. 2018, 35, 1145–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Craig, J.M.; Scott, A.L. Helminths in the lungs. Parasite Immunol. 2014, 36, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yasuda, K.; Nakanishi, K. Host responses to intestinal nematodes. Int. Immunol. 2018, 30, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Khim, G.; Em, S.; Mo, S.; Townell, N. Liver abscess: Diagnostic and management issues found in the low resource setting. Br. Med. Bull. 2019, 132, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Halliez, M.C.; Buret, A.G. Extra-intestinal and long term consequences of Giardia duodenalis infections. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 8974–8985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hénaff, F.; Hazart, I.; Picherot, G.; Baqué, F.; Gras-Le Guen, C.; Launay, E. Frequency and characteristics of infectious diseases in internationally adopted children: A retrospective study in Nantes from 2010 to 2012. J. Travel Med. 2015, 22, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Goutines, J.; Miller, L.C.; Sorge, F. Infections and nutritional status of internationally adopted children in France. Acta Paediatr. 2021, 110, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Miller, L.C.; Hendrie, N.W. Health of children adopted from China. Pediatrics 2000, 105, E76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Saiman, L.; Aronson, J.; Zhou, J.; Gomez-Duarte, C.; Gabriel, P.S.; Alonso, M.; Maloney, S.; Schulte, J. Prevalence of infectious diseases among internationally adopted children. Pediatrics 2001, 108, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Miller, L.; Chan, W.; Comfort, K.; Tirella, L. Health of children adopted from Guatemala: Comparison of orphanage and foster care. Pediatrics 2005, 115, e710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Murray, T.S.; Groth, M.E.; Weitzman, C.; Cappello, M. Epidemiology and management of infectious diseases in international adoptees. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Löscher, T.; Saathoff, E. Eosinophilia during intestinal infection. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008, 22, 511–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. van Balkum, M.; Kluin-Nelemans, H.; van Hellemond, J.J.; van Genderen, P.J.J.; Wismans, P.J. Hypereosinophilia: A diagnostic challenge. Neth. J. Med. 2018, 76, 431–436. [Google Scholar]
  32. Desoubeaux, G.; Collin-Dorca, A.; Guillon-Grammatico, L.; Dimier-Poisson, I.; Bez, S.; Bailly, É.; Bernard, L.; Maakaroun-Vermesse, Z.; Chandenier, J. Portage parasitaire digestif d’enfants adoptés. Arch Pediatr. 2016, 23, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Martelli, G.; Di Girolamo, C.; Zammarchi, L.; Angheben, A.; Morandi, M.; Tais, S.; Degani, M.; El Hamad, I.; Caligaris, S.; Ciannameo, A.; et al. Seroprevalence of five neglected parasitic diseases among immigrants accessing five infectious and tropical diseases units in Italy: A cross-sectional study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 335.e1–335.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Personal characteristics, geographical origin, and laboratory test results of the study population (n = 2385).
Table 1. Personal characteristics, geographical origin, and laboratory test results of the study population (n = 2385).
Total Populationn%
Gender
Male142059.54
Female96540.46
Region of origin
Africa40917.15
Latin America52922.18
Asia49220.63
Eastern Europe95540.04
Age Group
0–4 Years100642.18
5–9 Years112347.09
10–14 Years2279.52
15–18 Years291.22
Vitamin D
≤20 mg98441.26
>20 mg99341.64
Missing40817.1
Anemia
No157766.12
Yes1857.76
Missing62326.12
Eosinophil cell count
<500 cell/µL191580.29
500–1000 cell/µL33914.21
≥1000 cell/µL873.65
Missing441.84
Table 2. Results of investigations for parasites (by stool tests or serology) in the study population (n = 2385).
Table 2. Results of investigations for parasites (by stool tests or serology) in the study population (n = 2385).
ProtozoaChildren (n)%HelminthsChildren (n)%
Giardia lamblia29012.16Ascaris lumbricoides20.08
Entamoeba histolytica70.29Hymenolepis nana210.88
Entamoeba dispar20.08Ancylostoma duodenalis10.04
Cryptosporidium parvum10.04Enterobius vermicularis70.29
Blastocystis hominis763.19Strongyloides stercoralis120.5
Dientamoeba fragilis341.43Toxocara canis31216.44
Table 3. Results of investigations for parasites (by stool tests or serology) in the study population (n = 2385), by age class.
Table 3. Results of investigations for parasites (by stool tests or serology) in the study population (n = 2385), by age class.
1–4 Years 5–9 Years 10–14 Years 15–18 Years Total
1006 1123 227 29 2385
Protozoan%n%n%n%n%
Giardia lamblia14214.1213311.84146.1713.4529012.16
Entamoeba histolytica10.1050.4500.0013.4570.29
Entamoeba dispar10.1010.0900.0000.0020.08
Cryptosporidium parvum10.1000.0000.0000.0010.04
Blastocystis hominis100.99504.45167.0500.00763.19
Dientamoeba fragilis80.80221.9641.7600.00341.43
Helminths
Ascaris lumbricoides20.2000.0000.0000.0020.08
Hymenolepis nana100.99110.9800.0000.00210.88
Strongyloides stercoralis20.20100.8900.0000.00120.50
Enterobius vermicularis20.2050.4500.0000.0070.29
Toxocara canis616.0620217.994620.26310.3431213.08
Ancylostoma duodenalis00.0010.0900.0000.0010.04
Table 4. Results of investigations for parasites (by stool tests or serology) in the study population (n = 2385), by region of origin.
Table 4. Results of investigations for parasites (by stool tests or serology) in the study population (n = 2385), by region of origin.
Parasites According to
Region of Origin
Africa Latin America Asia Eastern Europe Total
n = 409 n = 529 n = 492 n = 955 n = 2385
Protozoan%N%N%N%N%
Giardia lamblia10325.188415.88489.76555.7629012.16
Entamoeba histolytica10.2410.1920.4130.3170.29
Entamoeba dispar00.0000.0010.2010.1020.08
Cryptosporidium parvum00.0000.0000.0010.1010.04
Blastocystis hominis30.73132.46489.76121.26763.19
Dientamoeba fragilis00.0071.3271.42202.09341.43
Helminths
Ascaris lumbricoides00.0010.1910.2000.0020.08
Hymenolepis nana40.98112.0861.2290.94301.26
Strongyloides stercoralis51.2210.1961.2200.00120.50
Enterobius vermicularis00.0030.5710.2030.3170.29
Toxocara canis225.3810820.42397.9314314.9731213.08
Ancylostoma duodenalis0000.0010.2000.0010.04
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiappini, E.; Paba, T.; Bestetti, M.; Galli, L. Parasitic Infections in Internationally Adopted Children: A Twelve-Year Retrospective Study. Pathogens 2022, 11, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11030354

AMA Style

Chiappini E, Paba T, Bestetti M, Galli L. Parasitic Infections in Internationally Adopted Children: A Twelve-Year Retrospective Study. Pathogens. 2022; 11(3):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11030354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiappini, Elena, Teresa Paba, Matilde Bestetti, and Luisa Galli. 2022. "Parasitic Infections in Internationally Adopted Children: A Twelve-Year Retrospective Study" Pathogens 11, no. 3: 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11030354

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop