Next Article in Journal
Risk Factors for the Development of Post-Infectious Bronchiolitis Obliterans in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Companion Vector-Borne Pathogens and Associated Risk Factors in Apparently Healthy Pet Animals (Dogs and Cats) in Khukhot City Municipality, Pathum Thani Province, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Role of Free-Living and Farmed Fallow Deer (Dama dama) as A Potential Source of Human Infection with Multiple-Drug-Resistant Strains of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Epidemiology and Species Diversity of Tick-Borne Pathogens of Animals in Egypt: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Epidemiological Survey of the Main Tick-Borne Pathogens Infecting Dogs from the Republic of Moldova

Pathogens 2022, 11(11), 1267; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111267
by Gianluca D’Amico 1,*, Angela Monica Ionică 1,2, Adriana Györke 1 and Mirabela Oana Dumitrache 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Pathogens 2022, 11(11), 1267; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11111267
Submission received: 9 October 2022 / Revised: 25 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 30 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper identifies the tick-borne pathogens and associated risk factors in dogs from Moldova. It is relevant since it is the first report of these pathogens in mammalian hosts and it supports the findings of that done in ticks in previous studies. The authors have identified some gaps in the research and attempted to answer a few. Overall the paper was well written and comprehensive. I have attached a few comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript concerning an "Epidemiological survey of the main tick-borne pathogens infecting dogs from the Republic of Moldova" is well-written, methodology used is adequate and results are well-presented and discussed.

No major suggestion were identified.

Minor suggestions:

-the text must be formatted and some words suchs as "versus" or "vs" must be in italic

- in the abstract and introduction the full name of parasite should be given, such as Babesia canis.

- the number of references appears to be too high - please consider reviewing this list

- despite of the above mentioned the inclusion of references such as Sanches GS (2018) and Torrejon E (2022) would improve discussion

- authors mention the work was conducted under a multi-center study but an explanation of why are researchers from Romania handling samples collected in the Republic of Moldova. Where the samples collected by the authors? Or where they obtained by people living in Moldava? 

- investigators and institutions of the republic of Moldova are acknowledged; please introduce which were their contributions

Author Response

please see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see attachment. It's not clear if the author's forgot to report controls (minor revision) or to include controls (major revision).

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop