Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Feeding Waste Milk Containing Antimicrobial Residues on Dairy Calf Health
Previous Article in Journal
Severe Concomitant Physaloptera sp., Dirofilaria immitis, Toxocara cati, Dipylidium caninum, Ancylostoma sp. and Taenia taeniaeformis Infection in a Cat
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/pathogens10020111
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Apicomplexan Protozoa Responsible for Reproductive Disorders: Occurrence of DNA in Blood and Milk of Donkeys (Equus asinus) and Minireview of the Related Literature

by
Stefania Perrucci
*,
Lisa Guardone
,
Iolanda Altomonte
,
Federica Salari
,
Simona Nardoni
,
Mina Martini
and
Francesca Mancianti
*
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(2), 111; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020111
Submission received: 21 December 2020 / Revised: 12 January 2021 / Accepted: 19 January 2021 / Published: 22 January 2021
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Donkeys may be susceptible to many pathological agents and may act as carriers of pathogens for other animal species and humans. This study evaluated the occurrence of potentially abortifacient apicomplexan protozoa DNA in blood and milk samples collected at different time periods during lactation (1, 6, and 10 months) from 33 healthy dairy jennies. A total of 73 blood and 73 milk samples were used for DNA extraction and analysis. Blood specimens from 11/33 (33%) jennies scored positive for Theileria equi, while milk samples scored negative. Blood and milk of 3/33 jennies yielded DNA of Toxoplasma gondii at 6 months (n. 1) and 10 months (n. 2) after parturition. Neospora caninum DNA was found in four milk and in five blood samples only at one month after parturition. This study is the first report about the presence of N. caninum DNA in milk of naturally infected jennies. Moreover, the excretion of N. caninum DNA in some of these jennies at 30 days from the parturition may suggest a possible occurrence of an endogenous cycle, while the presence of T. gondii DNA in the milk collected at 6 and 10 months after parturition may be suggestive of a discontinuous excretion.

1. Introduction

Donkeys (Equus asinus) differ from horses, being more stoical in their behavior and showing limited fear response and a great adaptability to different environmental conditions. They have narrow, vertical hooves that are suitable for rocky areas, and they can tolerate hot dry conditions, often in areas with low-quality forages. For all these reasons, donkeys are considered a more rustic species than horses [1]. Donkeys are worldwide bred for both productive (work and milk) and recreational aims. In recent years, donkey breeding has increased, also following the preservation and protection of autochthonous breeds [1]. However, the studies about the occurrence of pathogens of the donkey are still scant, being that this animal species is considered to not require much care. For these reasons, donkey health problems are neglected [2]. Nevertheless, donkeys may be susceptible to many pathological agents and, being their breeding is often promiscuous [3], they could also act as carriers of pathogens for other animal species and humans, when zoonotic agents are involved. In Tuscany (central Italy), Amiatina is an endangered autochthonous donkey breed, reared for both milk production and onotherapy; that is a donkey-assisted therapy aiming at improving body functions, activities, and participation in subjects affected by various disabilities [4].
Donkey milk is produced for human consumption, mostly intended for allergic infants and/or elderly people, and for cosmetic use. Therefore, microbiological controls to certify milk quality are required by the European law (Regulation EC 853/2004) [5] and routinely achieved in dairy donkey farms. However, to the best of our knowledge, data concerning the occurrence of potentially abortifacient apicomplexan protozoa in this animal species are scant, and the occurrence of the DNA of these protozoa in donkey milk has been scarcely investigated.
Indeed, among these agents, available data are only referred to Toxoplasma gondii [6], a zoonotic protozoan with cats as definitive hosts. The infection can be acquired by the ingestion of infected raw meat and milk, as well as from sporulated oocysts, and it has been reported worldwide in donkeys [3,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Although T. gondii is one of the main abortifacient agents, the infection in horses is usually subclinical. Nevertheless, atypical clinical signs such as fever, ataxia, retinal degeneration, encephalomyelitis, and abortion or stillbirth in pregnant equids have been described [7].
Neospora caninum is an Apicomplexan protozoan parasite closely related to T. gondii. Dogs act as final hosts and different mammals, including equids, are intermediate hosts, with cysts in the central nervous system and in the muscular tissue. This protozoan is a well-known abortifacient agent, with a large impact on cattle breeding, but it has been recently recorded as a cause of abortion and neonatal diseases also in horses [12,13,14]. N. caninum infection has been reported in donkeys worldwide, with different seroprevalences [10,15,16,17]. Although direct evidence did not suggest that abortion in donkeys is caused by N. caninum, jennies with an history of miscarriage showed significantly higher seroprevalence values for N. caninum than controls [16,18].
Theileria equi is the main agent of equine piroplasmosis in Tuscany [19]. This protozoan species is responsible for a tick-borne disease, causing important economic losses in equine breeding. Acute infection is reported to lead to abortion in mares [20,21,22,23]. However, recent findings suggested that transplacental transmission of T. equi is not common, and that this parasite should not be considered as a substantial cause of equine abortion [24]. Conversely, piroplasmosis develops as a chronic disease in infected donkeys [25], and this animal species may act as a reservoir for T. equi infections in horses. The infection has been described worldwide [26,27,28], and it has also been reported in donkeys from Italy [29,30,31,32], frequently associated with a specific clinical presentation and production losses [33].
The aims of this study were (i) to evaluate the occurrence of DNA of these selected protozoa in blood and milk samples collected at different time periods during lactation, from multiparous healthy dairy jennies of an autochthonous (Amiatina) breed from Tuscany, central Italy; and (ii) to provide a short review of the state of the art on the occurrence of these protozoa in milk.

2. Results

Blood and/or milk samples from 19 jennies scored positive for at least one of the selected protozoans (Table 1).
Blood specimens from 11/33 (33%) jennies scored positive for T. equi, while milk did not show the presence of this piroplasm DNA. Positive blood samples tested positive at every checking.
Blood and milk of three jennies presented DNA of T. gondii, two among them at ten months and the other at six months after parturition.
N. caninum DNA was detected in blood samples from five jennies at one month after parturition, whilst the following sampling scored negative. In four of these jennies, N. caninum DNA was also detected in the milk at the same lactation time (one month).
All the animals with positive milk specimens showed the presence of parasite DNA in blood.
A coinfection by T. equi and N. caninum was observed in a single jenny only (jenny N. 4, Table 1). More detailed results are reported in Table 1.

3. Discussion

The presence of T. gondii in milk has been reported since 1948 [34]. In fact, drinking raw milk is considered as a potential risk factor for T. gondii infection in human patients [35] and this topic has been reviewed by Boughattas [36]. Bovine milk had previously been considered a negligible source of infection [37], while milk from buffalo tested positive for DNA [38] and for both DNA and intact parasites [39]. However, cattle and buffaloes are considered as resistant species to T. gondii infection [40], and the results of the study of Dehkordi et al. [39] have been questioned [41].
Human clinical toxoplasmosis has been mostly attributed to raw goat milk consumption [42,43,44,45]. Caprine milk resulted positive for parasite DNA [38,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53], and for both DNA and viable tachyzoites also [39,41], while in another study goat milk tested negative in contrast to sheep and camels [54]. Milk of T. gondii infected camels was successfully bioassayed in mice [55], in cats and cells [39], and in mice and kittens [56]. The presence of T. gondii DNA in camel milk has been reported in several studies [38,39,54], even though in another study all specimens tested negative [53]. The literature dealing with potential infection of ovine milk has been recently reviewed [57], and T. gondii DNA and viable tachyzoites occurrence has also been reported [38,39,48,53,54,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. Camossi et al. [59] reported the presence of T. gondii DNA in milk from naturally infected ewes and detected T. gondii DNA twice in the milk of two sheep, suggesting a possible resurgence of tachyzoites from cysts, which can circulate again and be excreted through the milk. These findings were recently corroborated by a longitudinal investigation showing a discontinuous parasite excretion via goat milk [65]. Thus, despite the low number of jennies here examined, the presence of T. gondii at six and nine months after parturition in some jennies in this study would seem in agreement with these latter observations.
Data about the occurrence in donkey milk of DNA of the other abortifacient Apicomplexan protozoa considered in this study are lacking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the occurrence of N. caninum DNA in donkey milk. In chronically infected hosts, N. caninum may reactivate during pregnancy, and the consequent parasitemia may allow transplacental infection [66]. The endogenous cycle, reported as probably not able to maintain the parasite in dogs, is considered as the preeminent route of infection in cows [67], and it has been recently observed also in ewes [68]. Furthermore, a vertical post-natal transmission via milk was reported in a murine model [69,70], in 1 out of 51 puppies [69] and in cattle [71]. The presence of N. caninum DNA was demonstrated in cow milk, also [72]. The possible oral infection via colostrum was firstly demonstrated in experimentally infected calves within a few hours from the birth [73], and then confirmed in calves aged up to one week administered with colostrum added with tachyzoites, but not with milk or colostrum taken from naturally infected dams. For this reason, colostrum and milk were not considered as an important natural route for the transmission of N. caninum in cattle so far [74]. Anyway, the finding of N. caninum DNA in blood and milk of 4 out of the 22 samples drawn one month after parturition would suggest at least a possible occurrence of an endogenous cycle also in donkeys, with a recurrent parasitemia during pregnancy.
The prevalence rate of blood piroplasm DNA (33%) matches perfectly with a previous investigation from the same breeding [32], and the negative results for piroplasm DNA in donkey milk confirms the lack of reports dealing with the excretion of T. equi DNA via milk. Data about the trans-mammary transmission of piroplasms are scant. This route has been ruled out in puppies born from a bitch chronically infected by Babesia gibsoni [75], while this possibility was not excluded in a dog litter found infected by Babesia canis [76]. Colostrum samples from a cow herd endemic for Theileria orientalis scored positive by qPCR. However, all calves administered with colostrum tested PCR negative and only one among them appeared antibody positive, suggesting colostrum transfer as a possible mode of infection [77].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and Sampling

A total of 146 blood and raw milk samples (73 and 73, respectively), drawn at the same moment from 33 lactating jennies were used for DNA extraction. The subjects, aged from 4 to 18 years, were semi-extensively reared in a dairy donkey farm near Scarlino (42_ 530 52.59 N 10_ 470 05.52 E, WGS84), Tuscany, Central Italy. The farm produces pasteurized milk for human consumption according to European Union (EU) Regulation 853/2004 [5], and total bacterial count for Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogens and Staphylococcus spp. is routinely achieved to certify milk safety. All the selected jennies had been living on the farm for many years. Repellent as well as insecticide and other antiparasitic treatment had not been administered to any animal in the 12 months prior to the beginning of this study. No dogs neither cats were present on the farm.
Blood and milk samples were previously collected to evaluate hematological and milk cytological parameters during the whole span of lactation and to characterize genetic polymorphisms of selected animals [78]. For these reasons, samples drawn at about 1, 6 and 10 months after parturition were available. Blood samples (50 mL) were drawn from the jugular vein in sterile tubes with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Collected milk and blood samples were maintained a 4 °C until DNA extraction.
As shown in Table 2, 11 animals had a unique blood and milk sampling, 4 jennies had two blood and milk samplings, and from the other 18 animals, blood and milk samples were obtained three times. In total, 22, 20 and 31 blood and milk samples were available at 1 month, 6 months, and 10 months of lactation, respectively (Table 2).

4.2. Molecular Analyses

Fifty milliliters of milk were used for DNA extraction as previously reported [6]. Briefly, the sample was concentrated by centrifuge and, to avoid interference by casein, 1 mL of pellet was processed following Psifidi et al. method [79]. Somatic cells were diluted in 200 µL of PBS and submitted to DNA extraction. DNA was extracted from both blood samples and milk somatic cells using the commercial kit DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Milano, Italy), following the procedures reported by the producer. DNA was stored at 4 °C until used as template for PCR assays.
All DNA samples were analyzed through different PCR assays to detect T. equi, N. caninum, and T. gondii. More specifically, piroplasm DNA was searched for as reported by Beck et al. [80]. DNA of N. caninum was detected by a PCR carried out as described by Müller et al. [81] and an nPCR for T. gondii was performed as described by Jones et al. [82] with slight modifications, as previously described [6].
PCR were performed with Wonder Taq (Euroclone, Italy) in an automated thermal cycler (Gene-Amp PCR System 2700, Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). Sterile distilled water was used instead of DNA in the negative control. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel stained with GelRed® Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium). SharpMass™ 100 Plus Ladder (Euroclone, Milano, Italy) was used as DNA marker.
PCR products obtained from samples found positive for piroplasms were sequenced and analyzed. All sequencing procedures were performed by a commercial laboratory (BMR-Genomics, Padova, Italy). Sequences were assembled and corrected by visual analysis of the electropherogram using Bioedit v.7.0.2 30, then compared with those available in GenBank using the BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) to assign the species.

5. Conclusions

This study is the first report about the detection of N. caninum DNA in the milk of naturally infected jennies. Although the sample size is very small, the excretion of N. caninum DNA at 30 days from the parturition may suggest the possible occurrence of an endogenous cycle, as previously observed in cattle [67]. Similarly, the presence in some jennies of T. gondii DNA in the milk collected at 6 and 10 months after their parturition may be suggestive of a discontinuous excretion, as reported for small ruminants [59,65]. Conversely, data from this study may suggest that in lactating jennies T. equi DNA is not excreted via the milk, but further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M.; validation, S.P., F.M. and I.A.; investigation, F.M., I.A., S.P.; resources, all authors; data curation, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, S.P. and F.M.; writing—review and editing, S.P., F.M., L.G.; visualization, F.M., I.A., S.P.; supervision, F.M.; project administration, F.M., S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was carried out following the recommendations of the European Council Directive 155 (86/609/EEC) on the protection of animals and in adherence to a high standard of veterinary care. Ethical approval was not required in this study, as sampling was performed by the veterinarian of the farm as part of the routine clinical visit and to evaluate hematological and milk cytological parameters required by EU law.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carluccio, A.; Panzani, S.; Contri, A.; Bronzo, V.; Robbe, D.; Veronesi, M.C. Influence of season on testicular morphometry and semen characteristics in Martina Franca jackasses. Theriogenology 2013, 79, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Davis, E. Donkey and Mule Welfare. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2019, 35, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Machacova, T.; Bartova, E.; Di Loria, A.; Sedlak, K.; Mariani, U.; Fusco, G.; Fulgione, D.; Veneziano, V.; Dubey, J.P. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in donkeys (Equus asinus) in Italy. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2014, 76, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Camillo, F.; Rota, A.; Biagini, L.; Tesi, M.; Fanelli, D.; Panzani, D. The current situation and trend of donkey industry in Europe. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018, 65, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. European Commission. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 Laying down Specific Hygiene Rules for on the Hygiene of Foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2004. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0853&from=EN (accessed on 26 October 2020).
  6. Mancianti, F.; Nardoni, S.; Papini, R.; Mugnaini, L.; Martini, M.; Altomonte, I.; Salari, F.; D’Ascenzi, C.; Dubey, J.P. Detection and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in the blood and milk of naturally infected donkeys (Equus asinus). Parasit. Vectors 2014, 7, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Miao, Q.; Wang, X.; She, L.N.; Fan, Y.T.; Yuan, F.Z.; Yang, J.F.; Zhu, X.Q.; Zou, F.C. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in horses and donkeys in Yunnan Province, Southwestern China. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dubey, J.P.; Ness, S.L.; Kwok, O.C.; Choudhary, S.; Mittel, L.D.; Divers, T.J. Seropositivity of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic donkeys (Equus asinus) and isolation of T. gondii from farm cats. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 199, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alvarado-Esquivel, C.; Alvarado-Esquivel, D.; Dubey, J.P. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in domestic donkeys (Equus asinus) in Durango, Mexico slaughtered for human consumption. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bártová, E.; Sedlák, K.; Kobédová, K.; Budíková, M.; Joel Atuman, Y.; Kamani, J. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Neospora spp. and Toxoplasma gondii infections among horses and donkeys in Nigeria, West Africa. Acta Parasitol. 2017, 62, 606–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cong, W.; Chen, L.; Shan, X.F.; Qian, A.D.; Meng, Q.F. First genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii infection in donkey meat slaughtered for human consumption in Shandong province, eastern China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 61, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Villalobos, E.M.C.; Ueno, T.E.H.; Souza, S.L.P.; Cunha, E.M.S.; Lara, C.C.S.H.; Gennari, S.M.; Soares, R.M. Association between the presence of serum antibodies against Neospora spp. and fetal loss in equines Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 142, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Veronesi, F.; Morganti, G.; Ravagnan, S.; Laus, F.; Spaterna, A.; Diaferia, M.; Moretti, A.; Piergili Fioretti, D.; Capelli, G. Molecular and serological detection of tick-borne pathogens in donkeys (Equus asinus) in Italy. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 173, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Abreu, R.A.; Weiss, R.R.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Locatelli-Dittrich, R.; Laskoski, L.M.; Bertol, M.A.; Koch, M.O.; Alban, S.M.; Green, K.T. Association of antibodies against Neospora caninum in mares with reproductive problems and presence of seropositive dogs as a risk factor. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 202, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Machačová, T.; Bártová, E.; Di Loria, A.; Sedlák, K.; Guccione, J.; Fulgione, D.; Veneziano, V. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Neospora spp. in donkeys from Southern Italy. Vet. Parasitol 2013, 198, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cong, W.; Nie, L.B.; Qin, S.Y.; Wang, W.L.; Qian, A.D.; Meng, Q.F. Prevalence of Neospora spp. in donkeys in China. Parasite 2018, 25, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tirosh-Levy, S.; Steinman, A.; Minderigiu, A.; Arieli, O.; Savitski, I.; Fleiderovitz, L.; Edery, N.; Schvartz, G.; Mazuz, M.L. High exposure to Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora spp. in donkeys in Israel: Serological survey and case reports. Animals 2020, 10, 1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nazir, M.M.; Ayaz, M.M.; Ahmed, A.N.; Rasheed, I.; Faraz, A.; Akram, Q.; Akhtar, S.; Maqbool, A.; Tabassum, S.; Zheng, Y.; et al. Prevalence and risk factors for IgG antibodies to Neospora spp. in three types of equids from Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Acta Trop. 2018, 188, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ebani, V.V.; Nardoni, S.; Bertelloni, F.; Rocchigiani, G.; Mancianti, F. Tick-borne infections in horses from Tuscany, Italy. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015, 35, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kouam, M.K.; Kantzoura, V.; Gajadhar, A.A.; Theis, J.H.; Papadopoulos, E.; Theodoropoulos, G. Seroprevalence of equine piroplasms and host-related factors associated with infection in Greece. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Machado, R.Z.; Toledo, C.Z.P.; Teixeira, M.C.A.; André, M.R.; Freschi, C.R.; Sampaio, P.H. Molecular and serological detection of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in donkeys (Equus asinus) in Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 186, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rothschild, C.M. Equine piroplasmosis. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013, 33, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Sousa, S.H.; Paludo, G.R.; Freschi, C.R.; Machado, R.Z.; de Castro, M.B. Theileria equi infection causing abortion in a mare in Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2017, 8, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tirosh-Levy, S.; Gottlieb, Y.; Mimoun, L.; Mazuz, M.L.; Steinman, A. Transplacental transmission of Theileria equi is not a common cause of abortions and infection of foals in Israel. Animals 2020, 10, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Onyiche, T.E.; Suganuma, K.; Igarashi, I.; Yokoyama, N.; Xuan, X.; Thekisoe, O. A review on equine piroplasmosis: Epidemiology, vector ecology, risk factors, host immunity, diagnosis and control. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. García-Bocanegra, I.; Arenas-Montes, A.; Hernández, E.; Adaszek, L.; Carbonero, A.; Almería, S.; Jaén-Téllez, J.A.; Gutiérrez-Palomino, P.; Arenas, A. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infection in equids. Vet. J. 2013, 195, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. El-Sayed, S.A.E.; AbouLaila, M.; ElKhatam, A.; Abdel-Wahab, A.; Rizk, M.A. An epidemiological survey of Theileria equi parasite in donkeys (Equus asinus) in Egypt. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2020, 21, 100449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shah, M.H.; Ijaz, M.; Ahmed, A.; Aziz, M.U.; Ghaffar, A.; Ghauri, H.N.; Naveed, M. Molecular analysis and risk factors associated with Theileria equi infection in domestic donkeys and mules of Punjab, Pakistan. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 92, 103164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Torina, A.; Vincente, J.; Alongi, A.; Scimeca, S.; Turia, R.; Nicosia, S.; Di Marco, V.; Caracappa, S.; de la Fuente, J. Observed prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in domestic animals in Sicily, Italy during 2003–2005. Zoonoses Public Health 2007, 54, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Veronesi, F.; Diaferia, M.; Mandara, M.T.; Marenzoni, M.L.; Cittadini, F.; Fioretti, D.P. Neospora spp. infection associated with equine abortion and/or stillbirth rate. Vet. Res. Commun. 2008, 32 (Suppl. 1), S223–S226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Piantedosi, D.; D’Alessio, N.; Di Loria, A.; Mariani, U.; Neola, B.; Santoro, M.; Montagnaro, S.; Capelli, G.; Veneziano, V. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infections in donkeys from Southern Italy. Vet. J. 2014, 202, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Papini, R.; Salari, F.; Rocchigiani, G.; Leoni, A.; Ragona, G.; Roncoroni, C.; Fagiolo, A.; Veneziano, V.; Mancianti, F. Molecular detection of Theileria equi in donkeys (Equus asinus) in a selected site in central Italy. Large Anim. Rev. 2016, 22, 231–234. [Google Scholar]
  33. Laus, F.; Spaterna, A.; Faillace, V.; Veronesi, F.; Ravagnan, S.; Beribé, F.; Cerquetella, M.; Meligrana, M.; Tesei, B. Clinical investigation on Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in Italian donkeys. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Eichenwald, H. Experimental toxoplasmosis. I. Transmission of the infection in utero and through the milk of lactating female mice. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1948, 76, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Koutsoumanis, K.; Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordonez, A.; Bolton, D.; Bover-Cid, S.; Chemaly, M.; Davies, R.; De Cesare, A.; Herman, L.; et al. Public health risks associated with food-borne parasites. EFSA J. 2018, 16, 5495. [Google Scholar]
  36. Boughattas, S. Toxoplasma infection and milk consumption: Meta-analysis of assumptions and evidences. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2924–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dubey, J.P. A review of toxoplasmosis in cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 1986, 22, 177–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abadi, M.A.A.; Rahimi, E.; Shakerian, A. Seasonal and age distribution of Toxoplasma gondii in milk of naturally infected animal species and dairy samples Egypt. J. Vet. Sci. 2020, 51, 171–180. [Google Scholar]
  39. Dehkordi, F.S.; Borujeni, M.R.; Rahimi, E.; Abdizadeh, R. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in raw caprine, ovine, buffalo, bovine, and camel milk using cell cultivation, cat bioassay, capture ELISA, and PCR methods in Iran. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 10, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 1–313. [Google Scholar]
  41. Dubey, J.P.; Verma, S.K.; Ferreira, L.R.; Oliveira, S.; Cassinelli, A.B.; Ying, Y.; Kwok, O.C.; Tuo, W.; Chiesa, O.A.; Jones, J.L. Detection and survival of Toxoplasma gondii in milk and cheese from experimentally infected goats. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 1747–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Riemann, H.P.; Meyer, M.E.; Theis, J.H.; Kelso, G.; Behymer, D.E. Toxoplasmosis in an infant fed unpasteurized goat milk. J Pediatr. 1975, 87, 573–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sacks, J.J.; Roberto, R.R.; Brooks, N.F. Toxoplasmosis infection associated with raw goat’s milk. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1982, 248, 1728–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. De Andrade Chiari, C.; Pereira Neves, D. Toxoplasmose humana adquirida através da ingestão de leite de cabra. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1984, 79, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Skinner, L.J.; Timperley, A.C.; Wightman, D.; Chatterton, J.M.W.; Ho-Yen, D.O. Simultaneous diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in goats and goat owner’s family. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1990, 22, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Spisak, F.; Reiterova, K.; Spilovska, S.; Dubinsky, P. Prevalence estimation and genotypization of Toxoplasma gondii in goats. Biologia 2010, 5, 670–674. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bezerra, M.J.; Kim, P.C.; Moraes, É.P.; Sá, S.G.; Albuquerque, P.P.; Silva, J.G.; Alves, B.H.; Mota, R.A. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in the milk of naturally infected goats in the Northeast of Brazil. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2015, 62, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tavassoli, M.; Esmaeilnejad, B.; Malekifard, F.; Soleimanzadeh, A.; Dilmaghani, M. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in sheep and goat milk in Northwest of Iran by PCR-RFLP. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2013, 6, e8201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mancianti, F.; Nardoni, S.; D’Ascenzi, C.; Pedonese, F.; Mugnaini, L.; Franco, F.; Papini, R. Seroprevalence, detection of DNA in blood and milk, and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in a goat population in Italy. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 905326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Amairia, S.; Rouatbi, M.; Rjeibi, M.R.; Nouasri, H.; Sassi, L.; Mhadhbi, M.; Gharbi, M. Molecular prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in goats’ milk and seroprevalence in Northwest Tunisia. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 2, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Da Silva, J.G.; Alves, B.H.; Melo, R.P.; Kim, P.C.; Souza Neto, O.L.; Bezerra, M.J.; Sa, S.G.; Mota, R.A. Occurrence of anti- Toxoplasma gondii antibodies and parasite DNA in raw milk of sheep and goats of local breeds reared in Northeastern Brazil. Acta Trop. 2015, 12, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sroka, J.; Kusyk, P.; Bilska-Zajac, E.; Karamon, J.; Dutkiewicz, J.; Wojcik-Fatla, A.; Zajac, V.; Stojecki, K.; Rozycki, M.; Cencek, T. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in goats from the south-west region of Poland and the detection of T. gondii DNA in goat milk. Folia Parasitol. 2017, 64, 2017.023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Saad, N.M.; Hussein, A.A.A.; Ewida, R.M. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii in raw goat, sheep, and camel milk in Upper Egypt. Vet. World 2018, 11, 1262–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Iacobucci, E.; Taus, N.S.; Ueti, M.W.; Sukhbaatar, L.; Bastsukh, Z.; Papageorgiou, S.; Fritz, H. Detection and genotypic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii DNA within the milk of Mongolian livestock. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 2005–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Ishag, M.Y.; Magzoub, E.; Majid, M. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites in the milk of experimentally infected lactating she-camels. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2006, 5, 456–458. [Google Scholar]
  56. Medani, M.; Mohamed, H. Camel’s milk as a source of human toxoplasmosis in Butana area-Sudan. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 45, 471–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Van den Brom, R.; de Jong, A.; van Engelen, E.; Heuvelink, A.; Vellema, P. Zoonotic risks of pathogens from sheep and their milk borne transmission. Small Rumin. Res. 2020, 189, 106123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fusco, G.; Rinaldi, L.; Guarino, A.; Proroga, Y.T.; Pesce, A.; de Marco, G.; Cringoli, G. Toxoplasma gondii in sheep from the Campania region (Italy). Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 149, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Camossi, L.G.; Greca-Júnior, H.; Corrêa, A.P.; Richini-Pereira, V.B.; Silva, R.C.; Da Silva, A.V.; Langoni, H. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in the milk of naturally infected ewes. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 177, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Luptakova, L.; Benova, K.; Rencko, A.; Petrovova, E. DNA detection of Toxoplasma gondii in sheep milk and blood samples in relation to phase of infection. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 208, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Da Silva, M.G.; Vinaud, M.C.; de Castro, A.M. Epidemiological factors associated with seropositivity for toxoplasmosis in pregnant women from Gurupi, State of Tocantins, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2014, 47, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. De Santana Rocha, D.; de Sousa Moura, R.L.; Maciel, B.M.; Guimaraes, L.A.; O’Dwyer, H.N.; Munhoz, A.D.; Albuquerque, G.R. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in naturally infected sheep’s milk. Genet. Med. Res. 2015, 14, 8658–8662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vismarra, A.; Barilli, E.; Miceli, M.; Mangia, C.; Bacci, C.; Brindani, F.; Kramer, L. Toxoplasma gondii and pre-treatment protocols for Polymerase Chain Reaction analysis of milk samples: A field trial in sheep from Southern Italy. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2017, 6, 6501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dubey, J.P.; Jones, J.L. Comments on “Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in raw caprine, ovine, buffalo, bovine, and camel milk using cell cultivation, cat bioassay, capture ELISA, and PCR methods in Iran”. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 500–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gazzonis, A.L.; Zanzani, S.A.; Villa, L.; Manfredi, M.T. Toxoplasma gondii in naturally infected goats: Monitoring of specific IgG levels in serum and milk during lactation and parasitic DNA detection in milk. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019, 170, 104738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Dubey, J.P.; Buxton, D.; Wouda, W. Pathogenesis of bovine neosporosis. J. Comp. Pathol. 2006, 134, 267–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dubey, J.P. Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals. Korean J. Parasitol. 2003, 41, 1–16, Erratum in Korean J. Parasitol. 2003, 41, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. González-Warleta, M.; Castro-Hermida, J.A.; Calvo, C.; Pérez, V.; Gutiérrez-Expósito, D.; Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Mezo, M. Endogenous transplacental transmission of Neospora caninum during successive pregnancies across three generations of naturally infected sheep. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Cole, R.A.; Lindsay, D.S.; Blagburn, B.L.; Dubey, J.P. Vertical transmission of Neospora caninum in mice. J. Parasitol. 1995, 81, 730–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. López-Pérez, I.C.; Risco-Castillo, V.; Collantes-Fernández, E.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. Comparative effect of Neospora caninum infection in BALB/c mice at three different gestation periods. J. Parasitol. 2006, 92, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Moskwa, B.; Pastusiak, K.; Bien, J.; Cabaj, W. The first detection of Neospora caninum DNA in the colostrum of infected cows. Parasitol. Res. 2007, 100, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Moskwa, B.; Cabaj, W.; Pastusiak, K.; Bien, J. The suitability of milk in detection of Neospora caninum infection in cows. Acta Parasitol. 2003, 48, 138–141. [Google Scholar]
  73. Uggla, A.; Stenlund, S.; Holmdahl, O.J.; Jakubek, E.B.; Thebo, P.; Kindahl, H.; Björkman, C. Oral Neospora caninum inoculation of neonatal calves. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28, 1467–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Davison, H.C.; Guy, C.S.; McGarry, J.W.; Guy, F.; Williams, D.J.; Kelly, D.F.; Trees, A.J. Experimental studies on the transmission of Neospora caninum between cattle. Res. Vet. Sci. 2001, 70, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Fukumoto, S.; Suzuki, H.; Igarashi, I.; Xuan, X. Fatal experimental transplacental Babesia gibsoni infections in dogs. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 1031–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mierzejewska, E.J.; Welc-Falęciak, R.; Bednarska, M.; Rodo, A.; Bajer, A. The first evidence for vertical transmission of Babesia canis in a litter of Central Asian shepherd dogs. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2014, 21, 500–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Hammer, J.F.; Jenkins, C.; Bogema, D.; Emery, D. Mechanical transfer of Theileria orientalis: Possible roles of biting arthropods, colostrum and husbandry practices in disease transmission. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Salari, F.; Ciampolini, R.; Mariti, C.; Millanta, F.; Altomonte, I.; Licitra, R.; Auzino, B.; D’ Ascenzi, C.; Bibbiani, C.; Giuliotti, L.; et al. A multi-approach study of the performance of dairy donkey during lactation: Preliminary results. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Psifidi, A.; Dovas, I.D.; Banos, G. A comparison of six methods for genomic DNA extraction suitable for PCR-based genotyping applications using ovine milk samples. Mol. Cell. Probes. 2010, 24, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Beck, R.; Vojta, L.; Mrljak, V.; Marinculić, A.; Beck, A.; Zivicnjak, T.; Cacciò, S.M. Diversity of Babesia and Theileria species in symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs in Croatia. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Müller, N.; Zimmermann, V.; Hentrich, B.; Gottstein, B. Diagnosis of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii infection by PCR and DNA hybridization immunoassay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996, 34, 2850–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Jones, C.D.; Okhravi, N.; Adamson, P.; Tasker, S.; Lightman, S. Comparison of PCR detection methods for B1, P30, and 18S rDNA genes of Toxoplasma gondii in aqueous humor. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 634–644. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. Lactating Amiatina jennies reared for milk production in Tuscany (central Italy) which scored positive (19/33 of the examined jennies) at PCR analysis of milk and blood for DNA of Apicomplexa protozoa responsible for reproductive disorders at the different samplings (first, sixth, and tenth month of lactation). All positive jennies were negative for the presence of Theileria equi DNA in milk.
Table 1. Lactating Amiatina jennies reared for milk production in Tuscany (central Italy) which scored positive (19/33 of the examined jennies) at PCR analysis of milk and blood for DNA of Apicomplexa protozoa responsible for reproductive disorders at the different samplings (first, sixth, and tenth month of lactation). All positive jennies were negative for the presence of Theileria equi DNA in milk.
N. JennyToxoplasma gondii MilkToxoplasma gondii BloodNeospora caninum MilkNeospora caninum BloodTheileria equi Blood
1----+ °
2----+ °
3----+ °
4--+ §+ §+ °
5----+ °
6---+ §-
7--+ §+ §-
8----+ °
9+ ^+ ^---
10----+ °
11--+ §+ §-
12----+ °
13----+ °
14----+ °
15+ ^+ ^---
16-----
17--+ §+ §-
18----+ °
19+ *+ *---
§ first sampling (first month of lactation); * second sampling (sixth month of lactation); ^ third sampling (tenth month of lactation); ° all samplings (first, sixth, and tenth month of lactation).
Table
Table 2. Number of examined milk and blood samples taken from 33 lactating jennies reared for milk production in Tuscany (central Italy) at the 1st, 6th, and 10th months of lactation, and number of jennies having 1, 2, or 3 samplings.
Table 2. Number of examined milk and blood samples taken from 33 lactating jennies reared for milk production in Tuscany (central Italy) at the 1st, 6th, and 10th months of lactation, and number of jennies having 1, 2, or 3 samplings.
Milk and Blood SamplesN. Samplings/N. Jennies
1st
month		6th
month		10th
month		123
n. 22n. 20n. 31n. 11n. 4N. 18
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Perrucci, S.; Guardone, L.; Altomonte, I.; Salari, F.; Nardoni, S.; Martini, M.; Mancianti, F. Apicomplexan Protozoa Responsible for Reproductive Disorders: Occurrence of DNA in Blood and Milk of Donkeys (Equus asinus) and Minireview of the Related Literature. Pathogens 2021, 10, 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020111

AMA Style

Perrucci S, Guardone L, Altomonte I, Salari F, Nardoni S, Martini M, Mancianti F. Apicomplexan Protozoa Responsible for Reproductive Disorders: Occurrence of DNA in Blood and Milk of Donkeys (Equus asinus) and Minireview of the Related Literature. Pathogens. 2021; 10(2):111. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020111

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perrucci, Stefania, Lisa Guardone, Iolanda Altomonte, Federica Salari, Simona Nardoni, Mina Martini, and Francesca Mancianti. 2021. "Apicomplexan Protozoa Responsible for Reproductive Disorders: Occurrence of DNA in Blood and Milk of Donkeys (Equus asinus) and Minireview of the Related Literature" Pathogens 10, no. 2: 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020111

APA Style

Perrucci, S., Guardone, L., Altomonte, I., Salari, F., Nardoni, S., Martini, M., & Mancianti, F. (2021). Apicomplexan Protozoa Responsible for Reproductive Disorders: Occurrence of DNA in Blood and Milk of Donkeys (Equus asinus) and Minireview of the Related Literature. Pathogens, 10(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020111

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop