Next Article in Journal
Respiratory Tract Infections in Children
Next Article in Special Issue
Seasonality of Coxiella burnetii among Wild Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and the Hyalomma lusitanicum (Acari: Ixodidae) in a Meso-Mediterranean Ecosystem
Previous Article in Journal
Progressive Area Elimination of Bovine Brucellosis, 2013–2018, in Gauteng Province, South Africa: Evaluation Using Laboratory Test Reports
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acaricidal and Repellent Effects of Essential Oils against Ticks: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/pathogens10121594
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens Abound in the Cattle Population of the Rabat-Sale Kenitra Region, Morocco

by
Latifa Elhachimi
1,2,*,
Carolien Rogiers
2,
Stijn Casaert
3,
Siham Fellahi
1,
Thomas Van Leeuwen
4,
Wannes Dermauw
4,5,
Félix Valcárcel
6,
Ángeles Sonia Olmeda
7,
Sylvie Daminet
8,
Sarah El Hamiani Khatat
9,
Hamid Sahibi
1 and
Luc Duchateau
2
1
Departement de Parasitologie et de Sante Publique, Institut Agronomique et Veterinaire Hassan II, B.P 6202, Rabat 10112, Morocco
2
Biometrics Research Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
3
Laboratory of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
4
Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
5
Plant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 96, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
6
Grupo de Parasitología Animal, Animalario del Departamento de Reproducción Animal, CN INIA-CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain
7
Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, UCM, 28040 Madrid, Spain
8
Department of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
9
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Reproduction, Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, B.P 6202, Rabat 10101, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(12), 1594; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121594
Submission received: 21 November 2021 / Revised: 3 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 9 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Latest Advances in the Knowledge of Ticks and the Diseases They Transmit)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tick-borne pathogens cause the majority of diseases in the cattle population in Morocco. In this study, ticks were collected from cattle in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region of Morocco and identified morphologically, while tick-borne pathogens were detected in cattle blood samples via polymerase chain reaction assay and sequencing. A total of 3394 adult ixodid ticks were collected from cattle and identified as eight different tick species representing two genera, Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus. The collected ticks consisted of Hyalomma marginatum, Hyalomma anatolicum excavatum, Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, Rhipicephalus bursa, Hyalomma detritum, Hyalomma lusitanicum, Hyalomma dromedarii, and Hyalomma impeltatum. The overall prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in blood samples was 63.8%, with 29.3% positive for Babesia/Theileria spp., 51.2% for Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp., and none of the samples positive for Rickettsia spp. Sequencing results revealed the presence of Theileria annulata, Babesia bovis, Anaplasma marginale, Theileria buffeli, Theileria orientalis, Babesia occultans, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma capra, Anaplasma platys, Anaplasma bovis, Ehrlichia minasensis, and one isolate of an unknown bovine Anaplasma sp. Crossbreeds, females, older age, and high tick infestation were the most important risk factors for the abundance of tick-borne pathogens, which occurred most frequently in Jorf El Melha, Sidi Yahya Zaer, Ait Ichou, and Arbaoua locations.

1. Introduction

Ticks and their related diseases are a severe constraint to livestock development in many regions of the world [1,2,3]. Ticks and tick-borne diseases impact cattle production considerably and cause significant losses [4]. The total annual loss in cattle production due to tick-borne diseases in Tanzania was estimated to be 364 million [5], whereas the total annual economic cost related to the abundance of ticks and their transmitted diseases was 308,144 USD in a study conducted on the cattle population of Lake Mburo National Park in South Western Uganda [6].
In Morocco, the tick fauna is diversified [7]. The main reported tick-borne diseases (TBDs) infecting cattle in the country are theileriosis due to Theileria annulata, babesiosis caused by Babesia bigemina, and Babesia bovis and anaplasmosis due to Anaplasma marginale infection [8,9,10,11].
Tropical theileriosis (T. annulata) is transmitted by ticks of the genus Hyalomma [12,13,14]. In endemic areas, tropical theileriosis occurs in summer and spring, following the seasonal dynamics and the geographic distribution of its main vector Hyalomma detritum [15,16]. This tick species is well disseminated in North Africa, i.e., Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Sudan [7]. Similarly, bovine babesiosis is a seasonal disease, and its appearance in the field is closely related to the periods of activity of the tick vectors [17]. In Morocco, it has been reported that bovine babesiosis is endemic in all the main dairy cattle areas, and Boophilus annulatus is the main vector of this disease [18]. Anaplasma marginale is the primary causative agent of bovine anaplasmosis [19]. In the Mediterranean basin, this pathogen is widespread [20,21]. Several tick species are implicated in the transmission of A. marginale, e.g., Boophilus spp., Ixodes ricinus, Rhipicephalus spp., Dermacentor spp., Hyalomma spp., and other vectors, such as insects and the iatrogenic pathway [20].
For decades, no studies have been performed on the presence of ticks and their transmitted pathogens in cattle in Morocco. Furthermore, most of the previous studies on TBPs used serology and microscopy of blood smears. The objective of the present study is to investigate the occurrence of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in the cattle population of the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region of Morocco using molecular based methods. Moreover, the risk factors of cattle infection by TBPs were investigated, and their zoonotic potential was discussed.

2. Results

2.1. Prevalence of Ticks

Overall, 81.7% (415/508) of the examined animals were infested with at least one tick. A total of 3394 adult ixodid ticks were collected from cattle. The study showed the presence of two tick genera, namely Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus, with prevalence of 84.1% (2856/3394) and 15.9% (538/3394), respectively. The collected tick population consisted of 2702 males and 692 females. Females and males represented 19.8% (567/2856) and 80.1% (2289/2856) of Hyalomma ticks, respectively, while in Rhipicephalus genus, they represented 23.2% (125/538) and 76.8% (413/538), respectively. From these genera, a total of eight species were identified. The most abundant tick species was Hyalomma marginatum (38.9%, 1052/2702), followed by Hyalomma anatolicum excavatum (33.1%, 894/2702), Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (9.9%, 268/2702), Rhipicephalus bursa (5.4%, 145/2702), and Hyalomma detritum (4.3%, 116/2702). Hyalomma lusitanicum and Hyalomma dromedarii were observed with similar low prevalence (3.7%, 101/2702 and 99/2702, respectively), and Hyalomma impeltatum had even lower prevalence (1.1%, 29/2702). Data collection according to the location of sampling, species name, and the number of identified male ticks is summarized in Table 1. Tick infestation intensity according to Bush [22] (number of ticks/number of infested animals) was higher in female cattle (5.6) than in males (3.8) and in old and very old animals (6.3 and 6.1, respectively) compared to weaners and adults (2 and 2.9, respectively).

2.2. Prevalence of TBPs

The blood samples of all 508 animals were screened for TBPs by conventional PCR with group-specific primer pairs for Theileria/Babesia spp., Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp., and Rickettsia spp. The number of PCR-positive samples was 149 (29.3%) for Theileria/Babesia spp., 260 (51.2%) for Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp., and none of the samples was positive (0%) for Rickettsia spp. The overall TBP prevalence was 63.8% (324/508) with every individual carrying at least one of the two group pathogens. Eighty-four (25.9%, 84/324) of all infected cattle were found to carry pathogens from the two groups.
All 409 samples positive for genus primers for Theileria/Babesia and Anaplasma/Ehrlichia groups were selected for DNA sequencing to identify TBPs species. The number of samples that could be successfully sequenced for at least one of the two groups of pathogens was 304 (74.3%), of which 47 were sequenced for Theileria/Babesia spp. and 173 for Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp., while 84 samples were sequenced for the two groups of pathogens.
In total, 11 different pathogen species or genotypes were identified based on a match in the GenBank database. Ranked according to the most prevalent species, these were: Babesia occultans, Babesia bovis, Theileria orientalis, Theileria buffeli, Theileria annulata, Ehrlichia minasensis, Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma platys, Anaplasma capra, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma marginale, and an unknown Anaplasma sp. named herewith bovine Anaplasma sp.
PCR-positive samples from the Theileria/Babesia group were detected in all locations, with a high prevalence of 62.5% in JEM (35/56) and a low prevalence of 15.8% in ACH (9/57). Among the 131 positive and sequenced samples, 81 were T. annulata (61.8%). Furthermore, sequencing results revealed that 24 animals were infected with T. buffeli (18.3%) and 18 with T. orientalis (13.7%). Babesia bovis occurred in six samples (4.6%) only, all from JEM and KHM. Two cases of B. occultans (1.5%) were observed in the JEM and SAY location. Multiple alignments of nucleotide sequences revealed that all the sequences were conserved and shared 99.72% to 100% nucleotide similarity with sequences from GenBank (Table 2).
PCR-positive samples from the Anaplasma/Ehrlichia group were found mostly in the OLM location in the Middle Atlas (54/63, 85.7%), and the lowest prevalence was observed in the SAY location (11/53, 20.7%). Infections of A. marginale were found in all locations, with an overall prevalence equal to 54.1% (139/257). The overall prevalence for A. phagocytophilum was 28.8% (74/257), 11.3% (29/257) for A. capra, 1.9% (5/257) for A. bovis, and 0.3% for bovine Anaplasma sp. Infections with E. minasensis (2/257, 0.7%) and A. platys (7/257, 2.3%) were detected only in OLM. Furthermore, 74.3% (55/74) of A. phagocytophilum infections were found in OLM. Alignment of detected pathogen sequences showed that all the previous pathogen sequences were conserved and shared 99.40% to 100% similarity with sequences in GenBank, except for one sequence from a sample collected from OLM, hereafter referred to as bovine Anaplasma sp., which shared only 97.38% with an E. canis sequence from Iraq (MN227484.1) (Table 3).
Sequencing results showed that co-infections with species from the two studied groups of genera were highest for T. annulata and A. phagocytophilum (23.8%, 20/84) and common in animals from the Middle Atlas zone (60%, 12/20). Next, co-infections with T. annulata and A. marginale (19.0%, 16/84) were found mostly in cattle from the Coastal Plains (75.0%, 12/16). Finally, the association of infection with T. buffeli and A. marginale (17.8%, 15/84) was found at a similar rate in the three agro-climatic zones: five cases in the Middle Atlas and Gharb Plains and six cases in the Coastal Plains (Table 4).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis and Genetic Distances

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis for the genera Theileria/Babesia and Anaplasma/Ehrlichia shows the evolutionary relationships of the newly acquired sequences in comparison to published GenBank entries (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis were performed by constructing the phylogenetic tree based on 18S ribosomal RNA gene for T. annulata, T. buffeli, T. orientalis, as well as sequences of B. bovis and B. occultans generated from this study and matched species in the GenBank (Figure 1). Moroccan field isolates T. buffeli (OL305720, OL305723, OL305719) and T. orientalis (OL305721, OL305718) and matched species in the GenBank, T. buffeli from Sardinia (MT242566.1), and T. orientalis from China (MH208641.1) shared 100% identity and clustered in the same clade. Theileria annulata sequences from this study (OL305716) are 100% identical and appeared in the same clade with T. annulata from Italy MT341858.1. Meanwhile, the two sequences of B. occultans generated in this study (OL305717) are identical, and sequence analysis showed 100% identity to a reported sequence MN726547.1 from bovine ticks in Pakistan.
Sequences analysis and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis for the genera Anaplasma/Ehrlichia based on the gene sequence 16S rRNA showed the evolutionary relationships of the newly acquired sequences in comparison to published GenBank entries (Figure 2). Generated A. phagocytophilum in this study (OK606078, OK606088, OK606076, OK606072, OK606077, OK606073) shared 99.7% to 100% identity with sequences from Korea (GU064895.1, MN559940.1, MK239931.1), Russia (HM366583.1), Canada (HG916767.1), and China (KF569909.1). The new sequences of A. platys from Morocco are identical (OK606071) and shared 100% identity with the A. platys sequence (CP046391.1) from Panama. The two Moroccan A. bovis sequences from this study, OK606085 and OK606086, shared 99.70% and 100% identity with two sequences from China KP314244.1 and MH255938.1, respectively. The acquired A. bovis and matched A. bovis in the GenBank clustered within the same clade. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all newly generated and matching sequences of A. phagocytophilum, A. platys, and A. bovis clustered within the same monophyletic group. Twenty-one sequences of A. capra from this study were identical (OK606083) and shared 100% identity with A. capra from Korea (LC432126.1). Other sequences of A. capra from Moroccan field samples (OK606084 and OK606089) shared 99.71% with sequences from Korea (LC432114.1) and Angola (MT898985.1). Sequences of A. marginale from Moroccan cattle OK606081 and OK606082 shared 100% identity with sequences from Hungary (MH020201.1) and Kenya (MN266934.1), respectively. Acquired and matching sequences of A. capra and A. marginale formed a monophyletic group. Generated sequences of E. minasensis (OK606069 and OK606068) from this study matched very well and clustered in the same clade with corresponding published sequences of E. minasensis (MH500005.1) and E. canis (MN227484.1) in GenBank, except the sample closely related to E. canis, named here as bovine Anaplasma sp. (OK606070), which formed a separate branch.

2.4. Risk Factor Analysis

The risk factor analysis was only performed for two pathogens, A. marginale and T. annulata, as the other pathogens had too low prevalence to be analyzed properly.
For A. marginale, all studied risk factors except the health status had a significant effect (Table 5). Crossbreeds (compared to local breeds), female (compared to male) animals, modern (compared to traditional) farms, and beef (compared to dairy) cattle were at higher risk for A. marginale infections. With age and number of ticks, the risk for A. marginale infection declined. Locations also differed significantly from each other, with JEM and SAY having low prevalence and ACH and ARB having the highest prevalence.
For T. annulata, all studied risk factors had a significant effect (Table 5). Crossbreeds (compared to local breeds), female (compared to male) animals, traditional (compared to modern) farms, dairy (compared to beef) cattle, and sick (compared to healthy) animals were at higher risk for T. annulata infections. With age and number of ticks, the risk for T. annulata infection increased. Locations also differed significantly from each other, with OLM and ACH having low prevalence and JEM and SYZ having the highest prevalence.

3. Discussion

In the present study, morphological identification of the collected tick specimens revealed the abundance of hard ticks from two genera, Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus, with eight species, including H. marginatum, H. a. excavatum, R. sanguineus s.l., R. bursa, H. detritum, H. lusitanicum, H. dromedarii, and H. impeltatum. Consequently, the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region is one of the main tick reservoirs in the country. This study showed that H. marginatum or the Mediterranean Hyalomma is the most prevalent tick species existing in all sampled locations. This tick species is the main vector of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) and is responsible for the transmission of piroplasmosis to cattle [7]. Further studies are required to investigate the competent vector role of this tick species to the detected pathogens in this region.
Based on PCR and sequencing results, we found a high TBP prevalence, including a high level of co-infection with other TBP species from the two groups Theileria/Babesia and Anaplasma/Ehrlichia, while none of the cattle samples tested positive for Rickettsia spp. Many of the identified TBPs in this study are of major economic importance in North Africa [23,24], while some are causing zoonotic infections in humans. The most common combination found was T. annulata and A. phagocytophilum, detected in 20 animals. The investigated TBPs differed significantly depending on the cattle breed, age, sex, and geographical location. Cross-breeds, older age, females, and animals from ACH, ARB, JEM, and SYZ locations were the highest risk factor, respectively. The use of molecular techniques allows the detection of pathogens in carrier or sub-clinically infected animals compared to the previous studies in Morocco [25,26].

3.1. Theileria/Babesia Group

Theileria spp. are hemoprotozoan parasites infecting domestic and wild ruminants. In this group, T. annulata is the only species isolated previously in Morocco [15,27]. Theileria annulata is a highly pathogenic and host-cell transforming parasite causing tropical theileriosis in cattle with varying degrees of severity [28]. Tropical theileriosis caused by T. annulata is the economically most important TBD in North Africa, causing high morbidity and mortality in cattle [23]. In this study, the high overall prevalence of T. annulata (26.6%) as compared to other pathogens in the Theileria/Babesia group is in line with previous studies in Morocco [9,11]. The higher prevalence may be explained by the ability of cattle to carry this pathogen for a long time after infection without showing signs of illness, which explains the endemic stability. When animals are under physiological stress, this pathogen develops and causes the disease. Theileria annulata infection was found in all the study site with high prevalence, even in previously non-endemic locations, like Sidi Yahya Zaer (unpublished data) with high prevalence. This finding may be due to the spreading of the tick vector (H. detritum) in previously non-endemic regions because of climate change and an uncontrolled movement of animals in the country. This study is the first report of T. orientalis and T. buffeli in Morocco. The two pathogens are non-transforming host-cell parasites. These two species are considered as one species by some authors [29,30] and as separate species within a group by others [31]. Theileria orientalis and T. buffeli were considered benign; however, it has been demonstrated that their virulence is related to their genetic diversity and host specificity [32]. Generally, Theileria species cause clinical disease in cattle [33]. Here, T. buffeli and T. orientalis were detected in asymptomatic cattle with lower prevalence (6.2% and 4.6%, respectively) than T. annulata. Lower prevalence was reported in other African countries, e.g., Ethiopia with 1.3% and 0.9% for T. buffeli and T. orientalis, respectively [34], and Egypt with 0.68% for T. orientalis [35]. Amblyomma sp. and Rhipicephalus sp. are considered as major tick vectors of T. orientalis and T. buffeli in Africa [36,37]. However, further studies are needed to investigate the role of different tick species in Morocco to transmit those hemoprotozoan parasites to cattle.
Infections with Babesia spp. occur in large domestic animal species, including sheep, goats, horses, and dogs, as well humans. Major economic losses are observed in cattle [38]. In this study, the prevalence of B. bovis (1.5%) was very low compared to 15.9% in the study conducted earlier in Morocco by Sahibi et al. [39] using serology and blood smears. In the same study, the prevalence of B. bigemina was 5.4%, while in our work, none of the tested samples was positive for this pathogen. Similarly, B. bovis was detected in cattle from eastern Algeria, while B. bigemina was absent in a molecular survey of tick-transmitted protozoa and bacteria [40]. However, in Kenya, both B. bovis and B. bigemina were reported in cattle using nested PCR and sequencing [41].
This study is the first to report the presence of B. occultans from two naturally infected cattle in Morocco. Compared to B. bovis and B. bigemina, B. occultans is characterized by its low pathogenicity in cattle [42]. Recently, a study conducted in Iran has reported that two cases of cows infected with B. occultans manifested clinical signs [43]. The absence of isolation and identification of B. occultans in previous studies on bovine babesiosis in Morocco may be due to the use of blood smears and serology for TBPs. This study showed that Hyalomma ticks are widely distributed, and it was reported that ticks of this genus play an important role in the transmission of B. occultans [44,45,46]. Further investigations are warranted to assess the tick vector role associated with these tick-borne protozoa.

3.2. Anaplasma/Ehrlichia Species

Anaplasma spp. are important tick-borne pathogens of ruminants and humans [47]. Infections with these bacteria may vary from asymptomatic to fatal diseases [48,49]. Our findings confirmed that bovine anaplasmosis is endemic in Morocco, and A. marginale is a predominant TBP in cattle, with an overall prevalence of 45.7%. Previous studies in Morocco using microscopic examination of blood smears and serology showed a lower prevalence of A. marginale [8]. Moreover, the study conducted in North Central Morocco showed an overall prevalence of 16.5% by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and 21.9% by nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) assay in cattle [10]. These results are generally lower compared to our finding, and prevalence rates seem to be considerably lower using serological techniques than molecular-based ones. ELISA is based on the detection of antibodies and hence the animal health status and the ability of the immune system to produce detectable antibodies against pathogenic antigens during infection, which highly influences the sensitivity of this technique [26]. Furthermore, our observed prevalences are higher than those observed in neighboring countries, including Algeria (13% by microscopic examination of blood smears) [50] and Tunisia (24.7% by PCR using primer pairs targeting msp4) [51]. The reported overall prevalence of A. marginale in cattle was 7.4%, 30.7%, and 0.6% in Tanzania, Cameroon, and Kenya, respectively [52,53,54].
Ruminants are a competent reservoir of A. phagocytophilum. This agent of anaplasmosis was described for the first time in ruminants in 1932 [55] and later as an agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis [56,57]. Tick-borne fever disease due to A. phagocytophilum in ruminants and other animal species has been widely reported in Europe [58], while its description in North Africa is recent. Its circulation is currently confirmed in Tunisia, Algeria, and Egypt [21,59]. However, in Morocco, the study conducted by Ait Lbacha et al. [60] did not detect A. phagocytophilum in ruminants. The studies conducted by Elhamiani Khatat et al. [61,62,63] showed a high seropositivity rate of A. phagocytophilum in humans in Morocco; however, they failed to detect the DNA of the bacterium in dogs. Using conventional PCR and sequencing results, this study confirmed the circulation of A. phagocytophilum in Morocco with considerable prevalence in cattle (19.1%). Although Ixodes ticks are considered as the main vector of A. phagocytophilum, the DNA of this bacterium has been detected in other hard tick species, including Rhipicephalus spp. and Hyalomma spp. [64,65]. Furthermore, the absence of Ixodes ticks in our study area and the abundance of Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus tick species suggest that studies to investigate the vector role competence of these tick species to transmit A. phagocytophilum are needed.
In the group Anaplasma spp., it is the first evidence of the presence of A. capra, A. bovis, and A. platys in cattle from Morocco albeit with a very low prevalence. The species A. capra was first isolated from goats and humans in China [66,67]. Later, this tick-borne pathogen has been shown to infect sheep, cattle, dogs, and wild animals [68,69,70,71]. Recently, the zoonotic character of A. capra was confirmed in vitro by Peng et al. [72]. Thus, A. capra and A. phagocytophilum are presenting a potential public health threat in many regions of the world as well in Morocco. Anaplasma bovis infection was confirmed in diverse animal species, including ruminants, dogs, and cats. In general, A. bovis is less pathogenic than other Anaplasma species and usually causes subclinical infection in cattle [21]. In North Africa, an identical variant of A. bovis was isolated from animals in Tunisia (cattle, sheep, and goats) and Algeria (cattle) [21].
Anaplasma platys was first described in dogs from the USA by Harvey et al. [73]. It has been reported to cause infectious canine cyclic-thrombocytopenia as well as infections in cats, cattle, goats, camels, and humans [74,75,76,77,78]. Recently, it has been reported that Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. is the biological vector of this pathogen [79]. Elhamiani Khatat et al. [64] reported the presence of A. platys in dogs from Morocco with 7.5% of prevalence. The high prevalence of collected R. sanguineus s.l. from cattle in this study presents a high-risk factor of bovine infection with A. platys in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region.
The highest rate of infection with Anaplasma spp. was detected in the Middle Atlas zone. This finding may be attributed to the extensive forests in this area sheltering wild animals, which are the main reservoirs for tick-borne pathogens [80,81,82].
For a long time, bovine ehrlichiosis was mostly associated with infection by E. ruminantium; however, an ehrlichial species, namely E. minasensis, which is closely related to E. canis, was reported to be infecting dairy cattle and deer in many regions of the world [83,84,85]. A previous study reported the genomic characterization of the bacterium E. minasensis isolated from a naturally infected calf with clinical signs of ehrlichiosis [86]. In the study conducted by Cicculli et al. [87], E. minasensis was detected in H. marginatum ticks collected from cattle in Corsica, France. Our study showed that the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra is an endemic region of H. marginatum tick species, which may explain the presence of this bacterium in collected samples. Further studies are needed to investigate the presence of this microbial agent in animals and ticks as well its clinical significance in cattle from Morocco.
For identification at the genus level, the similarity of the 16S rRNA gene sequence should be at least 95% and, for identification at the species level, at least 99% [88]. In this investigation, one field isolate 16S rRNA sequence had only 97.38% similarity with the E. canis sequence from Iraq deposited in the GenBank under the accession number MN227484.1. Thus, our results indicate that there is one species within the genus Anaplasma that, till now, had not been sequenced and circulates among ruminants in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco. Because of the limitation of the 16S rRNA gene analysis in the determination of novel taxa [89], further genetic analysis is needed to characterize the unknown species of bovine Anaplasma strain observed in this study.
In the genus Anaplasma, tick-borne pathogens with zoonotic character are emerging and spreading in many regions of the world. Therefore, a further molecular survey of Anaplasma spp. is needed in the country.
In this study, ticks were not analyzed for TBPs, and the information on infected tick vs. the infected cattle is missing, which might lead to an underestimation of the prevalence of TBPs and the risk that ticks represent to human and bovine health.
In Morocco, most of the farms are traditional with a mixture of animal species, e.g., goats, sheep, cattle, and camels. Usually, dogs are present as the companions of the flock. These conditions are a high-risk factor of TBPs infection for animals as well humans.
Finally, this study suggests that theileriosis, babesiosis, as well as anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis should be considered as important veterinary concerns in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region of Morocco, and further research on the dispersion of tick species and molecular assays for detection of infection in ticks and animals to microbial agents is required.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Sites and Locations

The study was conducted in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, located in the northwest of Morocco. This region includes the capital of the country, three prefectures—Rabat, Sale and Skhirat-Temara—and four provinces—Kenitra, Khemisset, Sidi Kacem, and Sidi-Slimane.
The climate of the region is a semi-arid Mediterranean type with maritime or continental oceanic influence. This region is classified (Csa) according to Köppen-Geiger. Agriculture constitutes the main economic sector of the region (56% of the regional useful agricultural area (UAA) and 12% of the country’s UAA). In addition to agriculture, livestock has an important role, especially intensive cattle farming, with almost 520,000 heads of cattle. This region is including three different agro-climatic zones. The Gharb plains are characterized by a well-developed irrigated system with diversified agriculture and a high concentration of large dairy cattle farms. The coastal plains, where agriculture is based on rains and characterized by increasingly intensive cattle production (milk and beef), has a mixture between subsistence and large farms. The Middle Atlas, a part of Atlas mountainous region, is characterized by traditional farming of cattle and summer transhumance of sheep and goat flocks. Samples were collected from 9 locations well distributed in the different agro-climatic zones in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region (Figure 3).

4.2. Sample Collection

A total of 508 animals were examined randomly for tick infestation and blood collection in 117 farms belonging to the nine locations (Table 6). A maximum of five animals per farm were selected for sampling. All animals included in the study were sampled with the oral consent of their owners. The sampling was carried out in July and August 2019, the middle of the summer season in Morocco, with typically high tick infestation and TBPs-infection levels.
Information on age, sex, health status, breed, and farm information were obtained through farmer’s records and animal clinical examination. Four hundred and twenty cattle were females, and eighty-eight were males. Different cattle breeds were sampled in different locations, including indigenous Moroccan cattle, referred to as local breed, and their cross-breeds with Holstein, Charolais, and Belgian Blue, referred to as cross-breed. Farms with less than 20 cattle were considered traditional, and if there were more than 20 cattle, they were classified as modern. Cattle were divided into four age groups: weaners (1–2.5 years old), adults (2.5–4.5 years old), old (4.5–8 years old), and very old (>8 years old).
Collected ticks were removed from restrained animals with particular care using forceps on the following predilection sites: ears, neck, udder, perineum, and dewlap. The specimens were put in tubes with 70% ethanol. Immediately upon arrival at the laboratory, ticks were identified under a stereomicroscope according to identifications keys [90,91]. Female ticks were identified at the genus level, while males were identified at the species level.
Approximately 4 mL of whole blood was collected from each selected animal by jugular venipuncture using a sterile vacutainer tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Collected samples were transported to the lab in cool boxes and kept at −20 °C until DNA extraction. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethical Committee for Biomedical Research of the Mohammed V University of Rabat (n°627; July 2019).

4.3. DNA Extraction

For each sample, genomic DNA was extracted from the 100 µL EDTA whole-blood sample using the DNeasy Blood Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −20 °C until PCR analysis.

4.4. PCR Amplification

Conventional PCR with generic primers was used to identify groups of TBPs. To analyze blood samples for the presence of Theileria/Babesia spp., the genus-specific primers targeting the amplification of the V4 hypervariable region of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene were used (Table 7). Positive controls of T. annulata and B. bigemina were kindly supplied by colleagues from the Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Belgium, while double-distilled water was used as a negative control. Thereafter, all samples were screened by PCR for the presence of Anaplasma/Ehrlichia and Rickettsia pathogens using the genus-specific primers for Anaplasma/Ehrlichia and Rickettsia spp., targeting the 16S ribosomal RNA gene (Table 7). Genomic DNA of A. phagocytophilum and E. canis was obtained from the laboratory of bacteriology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University Belgium and Rickettsia massiliae from the laboratory of parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University Belgium and was used as positive control, while double-distilled water was served as a negative control.
For PCR reaction, a PCR mix was made in a total volume of 10 µL per sample, containing 2 µL of template, 0.1 µL of TEMPase Hot Start DNA Polymerase (5 U/µL; VWR, Leuven, Belgium), 0.2 µL of dNTP Mix (10 mM each; Bioline, London, UK), 1 µL of the adequate primers (forward and reverse, 5 µM each), 1 µL of 10× Key Buffer (VWR), and 5.7 µL of ultrapure water.
The PCR program consisted of an initial step of 14 min 30 s at 95 °C followed by 40 amplification cycles (denaturation for 30 s at 95 °C, annealing for 30 s at the specific annealing temperature for each primer, and extension for 1 min 30 s at 72 °C) and a final elongation step of 5 min at 72 °C. The corresponding gene loci, selected primer pairs, and annealing temperatures are presented in Table 7. PCR amplicons were subjected to electrophoresis on an agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under a UV transilluminator. All positive samples were sequenced to identify the pathogen species.

4.5. Sequencing of the PCR Positive Samples

Sequencing reactions were performed using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and run at Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany). The sequence alignments were screened and corrected using BioEdit software version 5.0.9 [92]. The nucleotide sequences were analyzed and compared with available sequences in GenBank using the NCBI’s analysis tool. The open-source BLAST program of the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda MD (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 18 February 2021) was used to search for similarity to other sequences in the public database.

4.6. Phylogenetic Analysis and Genetic Distances

Phylogenetic analysis and tree construction for the genera Theileria/Babesia and Anaplasma/Ehrlichia were generated using open-source molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software Version 10 program [93]. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was reconstructed. The Akaike information criterion was used to select the substitution model, Tamura 3-parameter model with gamma-distributed rates among sites, for maximum likelihood phylogeny. The robustness of the tree was established by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates. Bootstrap values above 50 were labeled on major tree branches to assign confidence levels to branches.

4.7. Nucleotide Sequences Accession Numbers

Representative gene sequences obtained in this study were submitted to the GenBank database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information using Bankit. The GenBank accession numbers were assigned to the sequenced genes, as shown in Table 8.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

The analysis was based on the logistic regression model. First, the location was introduced in the model. Next, each of the covariates was added to this model in a univariate way. Testing was based on the chi-square test, and results were reported in terms of percentage infection. Correlation between the presence of the most prevailing parasites was quantified by Kendall’s tau.

5. Conclusions

This study provides insights regarding the tick species and tick-borne pathogens found in cattle from the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region of Morocco and reinforces the utility of tick-borne pathogens identification by molecular methods. This study revealed high prevalence of H. marginatum ticks and diversity of tick-borne pathogens in cattle in the study area with the detection of Theileria spp. (T. annulata, T. orientalis, T. buffeli), Babesia spp. (B. bovis, B. occultans), Anaplasma spp. (A. bovis, A. capra, A phagocytophilum, A. platys), and Ehrlichia spp. (E. minasensis).
Findings of this study are an important trigger to direct the attention of veterinary and public health stakeholders in Morocco toward ticks and their emerging pathogens.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.E., L.D. and H.S.; methodology, L.E., C.R. and S.C.; software, L.E. and C.R.; validation, T.V.L., W.D., L.D. and H.S.; formal analysis, L.E., L.D., S.F. and C.R.; investigation, L.E. and C.R.; resources, L.D.; data curation, L.E. and L.D.; writing—original draft preparation L.E.; writing—review and editing, L.D., H.S., F.V., Á.S.O., T.V.L., W.D., S.F., S.E.H.K. and S.D.; supervision, L.D. and H.S.; project administration, L.D. and H.S.; funding acquisition, L.D. and H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Flemish Interuniversity Council-University Development Cooperation and Directorate General for Development. Grant Number: MA2018TEA466A103.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research of the Mohammed V University of Rabat (n°627; July 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences generated during this study are openly available in GenBank. Other primary data are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the financial support of the Flemish Interuniversity Council-University Development Cooperation and Directorate General for Development.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De la Fuente, J.; Torina, A.; Caracappa, S.; Tumino, G.; Furlá, R.; Almazán, C.; Kocan, K.M. Serologic and molecular characterization of Anaplasma species infection in farm animals and ticks from Sicily. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 133, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Torina, A.; Alongi, A.; Naranjo, V.; Estrada-Pena, A.; Vicente, J.; Scimeca, S.; Marino, A.M.; Salina, F.; Caracappa, S.; De la Fuente, J. Prevalence and genotypes of Anaplasma species and habitat suitability for ticks in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7578–7584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ruybal, P.; Moretta, R.; Perez, A.; Petrigh, R.; Zimmer, P.; Alcaraz, E.; Echaide, I.; Echaide, S.T.; Kocan, K.M.; De la Fuente, J. Genetic diversity of Anaplasma marginale in Argentina. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 162, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hurtado, O.J.B.; Giraldo-Ríos, C. Economic and health impact of the ticks in production animals. In Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens; Abubakar, M., Perera, P.K., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kivaria, F.M. Estimated direct economic costs associated with tick-borne diseases on cattle in Tanzania. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2006, 38, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ocaido, M.; Muwazi, R.T.; Opuda, J.A. Economic impact of ticks and tick-borne diseases on cattle production systems around Lake Mburo National Park in South Western Uganda. Trop. Anim. Health Pro. 2009, 41, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Walker, A.R. Ticks of Domestic Animals in Africa: A Guide to Identification of Species; Bioscience Reports: Edinburgh, Scotland, 2003; pp. 3–210. [Google Scholar]
  8. Verhulst, A.; Mahin, L.; Thys, E.; De Witt, K.J. Prevalence of antibodies of Anaplasma marginale in cattle from various African Biotopes in Central Morocco, North Cameroon and South Eastern Zaire. J. Vet. Med. B. 1983, 30, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Flach, E.J.; Ouhelli, H.; Waddington, D.; El Hasnaoui, M. Prevalence of Theileria in the tick Hyalomma detritum detritum in the Doukkala region, Morocco. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1993, 7, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ait Hamou, S.; Rahali, T.; Sahibi, H.; Belghiti, D.; Losson, B.; Goff, W.; Rhalem, A. Molecular and serological prevalence of Anaplasma marginale in cattle of North Centrale Morocco. Res. Vet. Sci. 2012, 93, 1318–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rahali, T.; Sahibi, H.; Sadak, A.; Hamou, S.A.; Losson, B.; Goff, W.L.; Rhalem, A. Seroprevalence and risk factors of bovine hemoparasitic diseases (theileriosis, babesiosis and anaplasmosis) in four major breeding areas of Morocco. Rev. D’élevage Médecine Vétérinaire Pays Trop. 2014, 67, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Walker, A.R.; Latif, A.A.; Morzaria, S.P.; Jongejan, F. Natural infection rates of Hyalomma anatolicum with Theileria in Sudan. Res. Vet. Sci. 1983, 35, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mustafa, U.E.H.; Jongejan, F.; Morzaria, S.P. Note on the transmission of Theileria annulata by Hyalomma ticks in the Sudan. Vet. Q. 1983, 5, 112–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Visera, J.; Hueli, L.E.; Adroher, F.J.; García-Fernández, P. Studies on the transmission of Theileria annulata to cattle by the tick Hyalomma lusitanicum. J. Vet. Med. B 1999, 46, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Flach, E.J.; Ouhelli, H. The epidemiology of tropical theileriosis (Theileria annulata infection in cattle) in an endemic area of Morocco. Vet. Parasitol. 1992, 44, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Darghouth, M.E.A.; Bouattour, A.; Ben Miled, L.; Kilani, M.; Brown, C.G.D. Epidemiology of tropical theileriosis (Theileria annulata infection of cattle) in an endemic region of Tunisia: Characterisation of endemicity states. Vet. Parasitol. 1996, 65, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gray, J.S.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Zintl, A. Vectors of Babesiosis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2019, 64, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El Haj, N.; Kachani, M.; Bouslikhane, M.; Ouhelli, H.; Ahami, A.T.; Katende, J.; Morzaria, S.P. Seroepidemiologie de la theilériose et de la babésiose au Maroc. Rev. Med. Vet. 2002, 153, 809–814. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kocan, K.M.; De la Fuente, J. Co-feeding studies of ticks infected with Anaplasma marginale. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 112, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aubry, P.; Geale, D.W. A review of bovine anaplasmosis. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2011, 58, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ben Said, M.; Belkahia, H.; Messadi, L. Anaplasma spp. in North Africa: A review on molecular epidemiology, associated risk factors and genetic characteristics. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bush, A.O.; Lafferty, K.D.; Lotz, M.; Shostak, A.W. Parasitology meets ecology. J. Parasitol. 1997, 83, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gharbi, M.; Darghouth, M.A.; Elati, K.; AL-Hosary, A.A.; Ayadi, O.; Salih, D.A.; El Hussein, A.M.; Mhadhbi, M.; Khbou, M.K.; Hassan, S.M.; et al. Current status of tropical theileriosis in northern Africa: A review of recent epidemiological investigations and implications for control. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 8–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Perveen, N.; Muzaffar, S.B.; Al-deeb, M.A. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases of Livestock in the Middle East and North Africa: A Review. Insects 2021, 12, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. El-Ashker, M.; Hotzel, H.; Gwida, M. Molecular biological identification of Babesia, Theileria, and Anaplasma species in cattle in Egypt using PCR assays, gene sequence analysis and a novel DNA microarray. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 207, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Al-Hosary, A.; Răileanu, C.; Tauchmann, O.; Fischer, S.; Nijhof, A.M.; Silaghi, C. Epidemiology and genotyping of Anaplasma marginale and co-infection with piroplasms and other Anaplasmataceae in cattle and buffaloes from Egypt. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kachani, M.; Flach, E.J.; Williamson, S.; Ouhelli, H.; El Hasnaoui, M.; Spooner, M. The use of enzime-linke dimmunosorbent assay for tropical theilleriosis in Morocco. Prev. Vet. Med. 1995, 26, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dobbelaere, D.A.; Küenzi, P. The strategies of the Theileria parasite: A new twist in host-pathogen interactions. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2004, 16, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fujisaki, K.; Kawazu, S.; Kamio, T. The taxonomy of the bovine Theileria spp. Parasitol. Today 1994, 10, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gubbels, M.J.; Hong, Y.; van der Weide, M.; Qi, B.; Nijman, I.J.; Guangyuan, L.; Jongejan, F. Molecular characterisation of the Theileria buffeli/orientalis group. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kakuda, T.; Shiki, M.; Kubota, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Brown, W.C.; Kosum, C.; Nopporn, S.; Onuma, M. Phylogeny of benign Theileria species from cattle in Thailand, China and the USA based on the major piroplasm surface protein and small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28, 1261–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sivakumar, T.; Hayashida, K.; Sugimoto, C.; Yokoyama, N. Evolution and genetic diversity of Theileria. Infect Genet Evol. 2014, 27, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Eamens, G.J.; Bailey, G.; Jenkins, C.; Gonsalves, J.R. Significance of Theileria orientalis types in individual affected beef herds in New South Wales based on clinical, smear and PCR findings. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 196, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gebrekidan, H.; Gasser, R.B.; Baneth, G.; Yasur-Landau, D.; Nachum-Biala, Y.; Hailu, A.; Jabbar, A. Molecular characterization of Theileria orientalis from cattle in Ethiopia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Elsify, A.; Sivakumar, T.; Nayel, M.; Salama, A.; Elkhtam, A.; Rizk, M.; Mosaab, O.; Sultan, K.; Elsayed, S.; Igarashi, I.; et al. An epidemiological survey of bovine Babesia and Theileria parasites in cattle, buffaloes, and sheep in Egypt. Parasitol. Int. 2015, 64, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kumsa, B.; Signorini, M.; Teshale, S.; Tessarin, C.; Duguma, R.; Ayana, D.; Martini, M.; Cassini, R. Molecular detection of piroplasms in ixodid ticks infesting cattle and sheep in western Oromia, Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2014, 46, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hornok, S.; Abichu, G.; Meli, M.L.; Tánczos, B.; Sulyok, K.M.; Gyuranecz, M.; Gönczi, E.; Farkas, R.; Hofmann-Lehmann, R. Influence of the biotope on the tick infestation of cattle and on the tick-borne pathogen repertoire of cattle ticks in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2014, 23, e106452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fahrimal, Y.; Gott, W.L.; Jamer, D.P. Detection of Babesia bovis carrier cattle by using polymerase chain reaction amplification of parasite DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992, 30, 1374–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Sahibi, H.; Rhalem, A.; Berrag, B.; Goff, W.L. Bovine babesiosis: Seroprevalence and ticks associated with cattle from two different regions of Morocco. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 849, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sadeddine, R.; Diarra, A.Z.; Laroche, M.; Mediannikov, O.; Righi, S.; Benakhla, A.; Dahmana, H.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P. Molecular identification of protozoal and bacterial organisms in domestic animals and their infesting ticks from north eastern Algeria. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Adjou Moumouni, P.F.; Aboge, G.O.; Terkawi, M.A.; Masatani, T.; Cao, S.; Kamyingkird, K.; Jirapattharasate, C.; Zhou, M.; Wang, G.; Liu, M.; et al. Molecular detection and characterization of Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina, Theileria species and Anaplasma marginale isolated from cattle in Kenya. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Aktas, M.; Ozubek, S. Molecular and parasitological survey of bovine piroplasms in the Black Sea Region, including the first report of babesiosis associated with Babesia divergens inTurkey. J. Med. Entomol. 2015, 52, 1344–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Noaman, V.; Ghadimipour, R.; Nabavi, R. First report of Babesia occultans in two symptomatic cows in Iran. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 1915–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ros-Garcia, A.; M’ghirbi, Y.; Bouattour, A.; Hurtado, A. First detection of Babesia occultans in Hyalomma ticks from Tunisia. Parasitology 2011, 138, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Aktas, M.; Vatansever, Z.; Ozubek, S. Molecular evidence for trans-stadial and transovarial transmission of Babesia occultans in Hyalomma marginatum and Rhipicephalus turanicus in Turkey. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 204, 369–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, M.; Guan, G.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, S.; Ma, C.; Cheng, S.; Yin, H.; Luo, J. Molecular survey and genetic diversity of Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. in cattle in Gansu province China. Acta Parasitol. 2020, 65, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rar, V.; Tkachev, S.; Tikunova, N. Genetic diversity of Anaplasma bacteria: Twenty years later. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 91, 104833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kocan, K.M.; Delafuente, J.; Guglielmone, A.A.; Melendez, R.D. Antigens and alterative for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 698–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mylonakis, M.E.; Theodorou, K.N. Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis: An update on diagnosis and treatment. Acta Vet. Brno 2017, 67, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Foughali, A.A.; Ziam, H.; Aiza, A.; Boulkrout, H.; Berber, A.; Bitam, I.; Gharbi, M. Cross-sectional survey of cattle haemopathogens in Constantine, Northeast Algeria. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 7, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. M’ghirbi, Y.; Ros-García, A.; Iribar, P.; Rhaim, A.; Hurtado, A.; Bouattour, A.A. Molecular study of tick-borne haemoprotozoan parasites (Theileria and Babesia) in small ruminants in northern Tunisia. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 198, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ringo, A.E.; Adjou Moumouni, P.F.; Lee, S.-H.; Liu, M.; Khamis, Y.H.; Gao, Y.; Guo, H.; Zheng, W.; Efstratiou, A.; Galon, E.M.; et al. Molecular detection and characterization of tick-borne protozoan and rickettsial pathogens isolated from cattle on Pemba Island, Tanzania. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 1437–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Abanda, B.; Paguem, A.; Abdoulmoumini, M.; Kingsley, M.T.; Renz, A.; Eisenbarth, A. Molecular identification and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in zebu and taurine cattle in North Cameroon. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Okal, M.N.; Odhiambo, B.K.; Otieno, P.; Bargul, J.L.; Masiga, D.; Villinger, J.; Kalayou, S. Anaplasma and Theileria Pathogens in Cattle of Lambwe Valley, Kenya: A Case for Pro-Active Surveillance in the Wildlife–Livestock Interface. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Stuen, S.; Granquist, E.G.; Silaghi, C. Anaplasma phagocytophilum a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chen, S.M.; Dumler, J.S.; Bakken, J.S.; Walker, D.H. Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Bakken, J.S.; Dumler, S. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2008, 22, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Stuen, S. Anaplasma phagocytophilum—The most widespread tick-borne infection in animals in Europe. Vet. Res. Commun. 2007, 31, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ghafar, M.W.; EL-Enbaawy, M.I.; Ghoneim, M.A. Nested PCR detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in sheep and human contacts in Egypt. J. Egypt. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2005, 65, 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ait Lbacha, H.; Alali, S.; Zouagui, Z.; El Mamoun, L.; Rhalem, A.; Petit, E.; Haddad, N.; Gandoin, C.; Boulouis, H.J.; Maillard, R. High prevalence of Anaplasmas pp. in small ruminants in Morocco. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 60, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Elhamiani Khatat, S.; Daminet, S.; Kachani, M.; Leutenegger, C.; Duchateau, L.; El Amri, H.; Hing, M.; Azib, R.; Sahibi, H. Anaplasma spp. in dogs and owners in northwestern Morocco. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Elhamiani Khatat, S.; Sahibi, H.; Hing, M.; Alaoui Moustain, I.; El Amri, H.; Benajiba, M.; Kachani, M.; Duchateau, L.; Daminet, S. Human Exposure to Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Two Cities of Northwestern Morocco. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Elhamiani Khatat, S.; Khallaayoune, K.; Errafyk, N.; Van Gool, F.; Duchateau, L.; Daminet, S.; Kachani, M.; El Amri, H.; Azib, R.; Sahibi, H. Detection of Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. antibodies, and Dirofilaria immitis antigens in dogs from seven locations of Morocco. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 239, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chastagner, A.; Bailly, X.; Leblond, A.; Pradier, S.; Vourc’h, G. Single Genotype of Anaplasma phagocytophilum identified from ticks, Camargue, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 825–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chisu, V.; Zobba, R.; Lecis, R.; Sotgiu, F.; Masala, G.; Foxi, C.; Pisu, D.; Alberti, A. GroEL typing and phylogeny of Anaplasma species in ticks from domestic and wild vertebrates. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Li, H.; Zheng, Y.C.; Ma, L.; Jia, N.; Jiang, B.G.; Jiang, R.R.; Huo, Q.B.; Wang, Y.W.; Liu, H.B.; Chu, Y.L.; et al. Human infection with a novel tick-borne Anaplasma species in China: A surveillance study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhou, Z.; Nie, K.; Tang, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, R.; Hu, S.; Zhang, Z. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Anaplasma in Southwestern China based on 16S rRNA sequence. Res. Vet. Sci. 2010, 89, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Peng, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhao, S.; Yan, Y.; Wang, H.; Jing, J.; Jian, F.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L.; Ning, C. Detection and phylogenetic characterization of Anaplasma capra: An emerging pathogen in sheep and goats in China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Seo, M.G.; Ouh, I.O.; Lee, H.; Geraldino, P.J.L.; Rhee, M.H.; Kwon, O.D.; Kwak, D. Differential identification of Anaplasma in cattle and potential of cattle to serve as reservoirs of Anaplasma capra, an emerging tick-borne zoonotic pathogen. Vet. Microbiol. 2018, 226, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shi, K.; Li, J.; Yan, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wang, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, D.; Chen, Y.; Yu, F.; Peng, Y.; et al. Dogs as new hosts for the emerging zoonotic pathogen Anaplasma capra in China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jouglin, M.; Blanc, B.; de la Cotte, N.; Bastian, S.; Ortiz, K.; Malandrin, L. First detection and molecular identification of the zoonotic Anaplasma capra in deer in France. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Peng, Y.; Lu, C.; Yan, Y.; Song, J.; Pei, Z.; Gong, P.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L.; Jian, F.; Ning, C. The Novel Zoonotic Pathogen, Anaplasma capra, Infects Human Erythrocytes, HL-60, and TF-1 Cells In Vitro. Pathogens 2021, 10, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Harvey, J.W.; Simpson, C.F.; Gaskin, J.M. Cyclic thrombocytopenia induced by a Rickettsia-like agent in dogs. J. Infect. Dis. 1978, 137, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Qurollo, B.A.; Balakrishnan, N.; Cannon, C.Z.; Maggi, R.G.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Co- infection with Anaplasma platys, Bartonella henselae, Bartonella koehlerae and ‘Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum’ in a cat diagnosed with splenic plasmacytosis and multiple myeloma. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2014, 16, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Arraga-Alvarado, C.M.; Qurollo, B.A.; Parra, O.C.; Berrueta, M.A.; Hegarty, B.C.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Case report: Molecular evidence of Anaplasma platys infection in two women from Venezuela. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 91, 1161–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dahmani, M.; Davoust, B.; Benterki, M.S.; Fenollar, F.; Raoult, D.; Mediannikov, O. Development of a new PCR-based assay to detect Anaplasmataceae and the first report of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys in cattle from Algeria. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 39, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wei, W.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.W.; Jiang, B.G.; Liu, H.B.; Wei, R.; Jiang, R.-R.; Cui, X.-M.; Li, L.-F.; Yuan, T.-T.; et al. Anaplasma platys-like infection in goats, Beijing, China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020, 20, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Alhassan, A.; Hove, P.; Sharma, B.; Matthew-Belmar, V.; Karasek, I.; Lanza-Perea, M.; Werners, A.H.; Wilkerson, M.J.; Ganta, R.R. Molecular detection and characterization of Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis in dogs from the Caribbean. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Aktas, M.; Ozubek, S. Molecular evidence for trans-stadial transmission of Anaplasma platys by Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato under field conditions. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2018, 32, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Atif, F.A. Alpha proteobacteria of genus Anaplasma (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae): Epidemiology and characteristics of Anaplasma species related to veterinary and public health importance. Parasitology 2016, 143, 659–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Battilani, M.; De Arcangeli, S.; Balboni, A.; Dondi, F. Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of Anaplasma. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 49, 195–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Koh, F.X.; Panchadcharam, C.; Sitam, F.T.; Tay, S.T. Molecular investigation of Anaplasma spp. in domestic and wildlife animals in Peninsular Malaysia. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2018, 13, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gajadhar, A.A.; Lobanov, V.; Scandrett, W.B.; Campbell, J.; Al-Adhami, B. A novel Ehrlichia genotype detected in naturally infected cattle in North America. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 173, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lobanov, V.A.; Gajadhar, A.A.; Al-Adhami, B.; Schwantje, H.M. Molecular study of free-ranging mule deer and white-tailed deer from British Columbia, Canada, for evidence of Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2011, 59, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Aguiar, D.M.; Ziliani, T.F.; Zhang, X.; Melo, A.L.; Braga, I.A.; Witter, R.; Freitas, L.C.; Rondelli, A.L.; Luis, M.A.; Sorte, E.C.; et al. A novel Ehrlichia genotype strain distinguished by the TRP36 gene naturally infects cattle in Brazil and causes clinical manifestations associated with ehrlichiosis. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Aguiar, D.M.; Araújo, J.P., Jr.; Nakazato, L.; Bard, E.; Aguilar-Bultet, L.; Vorimore, F.; Popov, V.L.; Colodel, E.M.; Cabezas-Cruz, A. Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Pathogenic Strain of Ehrlichia minasensis. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Cicculi, V.; Masse, S.; Capai, L.; de Lamballerie, X.; Charrel, R.; Falchi, A. First detection of Ehrlichia minasensis in Hyalomma marginatum ticks collected from cattle in Corsica, France. Vet. Med. Sci. 2019, 5, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Clarridge, J.E., III. Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 840–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Martinez-Murcia, A.J.; Antón, A.I.; Rodrîguez-Valera, F. Patterns of sequence variation in two regions of the 16S rRNA multigene family of Escherichia coli. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1999, 49, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Estrada-Peña, A.; Bouattour, A.; Camicas, J.L.; Walker, A.R. Ticks of Domestic Animals in the Mediterranean Region; University of Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 2004; p. 131. [Google Scholar]
  91. Apanaskevich, D.A.; Horak, I.G. The genus Hyalomma Koch, 1844: V. re-evaluation of the taxonomic rank of taxa comprising the H. (Euhyalomma) marginatum Koch complex of species (Acari: Ixodidae) with redescription of all parasitic stages and notes on biology. Int. J. Acarol. 2008, 34, 13–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hall, T. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  93. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Pathogens 10 01594 g001 550
Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis of Theleria/Babesia spp. 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap support (1000 boutstrap replicates). Sequences obtained during this study are indicated with black dots.
Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis of Theleria/Babesia spp. 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap support (1000 boutstrap replicates). Sequences obtained during this study are indicated with black dots.
Pathogens 10 01594 g001
Pathogens 10 01594 g002 550
Figure 2. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp. 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap support (1000 bootstrap replicates). Sequences that were obtained during this study are indicated with black dots.
Figure 2. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp. 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap support (1000 bootstrap replicates). Sequences that were obtained during this study are indicated with black dots.
Pathogens 10 01594 g002
Pathogens 10 01594 g003 550
Figure 3. Map of Sampling locations in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region of Morocco.
Figure 3. Map of Sampling locations in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region of Morocco.
Pathogens 10 01594 g003
Table
Table 1. Tick species abundance in cattle according to location in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco.
Table 1. Tick species abundance in cattle according to location in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco.
ZoneLocationH. marginatumH. a. excavatumH. detritumH. lusitanicumH. dromedariiH. impeltatumR. sanguineus s.l.R. bursaTotal Ticks (%)
Middle Atlas
mountains		ACH7217301260257295 (10.9)
KHM7813217603012266 (9.8)
OLM76143393072243 (9)
The Gharb
Plains		ARB11481713022214253 (9.4)
JEM1888027612106238423 (15.6)
SAY15759281411143624343 (12.7)
The Coastal
Plains		ROM60801020112818218 (8.0)
SKH1101052062802112302 (11.2)
SYZ1974120143203718359 (13.3)
Total ticks (%) 1052 (38.9)894 (33.1)116 (4.3)101 (3.7)99 (3.7)27 (1.1)268 (9.9)145 (5.4)2702 (100)
Abbreviations: H., Hyalomma; a., anatolicum; R., Rhipicephalus.
Table
Table 2. Theileria/Babesia species in cattle blood from the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region in Morocco, determined by DNA sequencing and matched species in GenBank database.
Table 2. Theileria/Babesia species in cattle blood from the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region in Morocco, determined by DNA sequencing and matched species in GenBank database.
Strain of ReferencePI (%)CountryAccession NumberNumber of Positives (n = 131)
B. occultans100.00PakistanMN726547.12
B. bovis99.74USAMH045746.15
B. bovis99.72USAMH045761.11
T. orientalis100.00ChinaMH208641.118
T. buffeli100.00SardiniaMT242566.124
T. annulata100.00ItalyMT341858.181
Abbreviations: PI, percentage identity (similarity in %) between the field isolate from this study and matched species in the GenBank.
Table
Table 3. Anaplasma/Ehrlichia species in cattle blood from the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region in Morocco, determined by DNA sequencing and matched species in GenBank database.
Table 3. Anaplasma/Ehrlichia species in cattle blood from the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region in Morocco, determined by DNA sequencing and matched species in GenBank database.
Strain of ReferencePI (%)CountryAccession NumberNumber of Positives (257)
E. minasensis99.42AustraliaMH500005.12
A. bovis100.00ChinaMH255938.14
A. bovis99.71ChinaKP314244.11
A. platys100.00PanamaCP046391.17
A. capra100.00KoreaLC432126.121
A. capra99.71KoreaLC432114.15
A. capra99.71AngolaMT898985.13
A. marginale100.00HungaryMH020201.1131
A. marginale100.00KenyaMN266934.18
A. phagocytophilum99.70KoreaGU064895.130
A. phagocytophilum100.00RussiaHM366583.123
A. phagocytophilum100.00KoreaMK239931.113
A. phagocytophilum100.00CanadaHG916767.13
A. phagocytophilum99.71KoreaMN559940.13
A. phagocytophilum100.00ChinaKF569909.12
E. canis (Bovine Anaplasma sp.)97.38IraqMN227484.11
Abbreviations: PI, percentage identity (similarity in %) between the field isolate from this study and matched species in the GenBank.
Table
Table 4. Prevalence of cattle co-infections with pathogen species from the two groups Theleria/Babesia and Anaplasma/Ehrlichia by conventional PCR and sequencing in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco (total number of co-infections equals 84).
Table 4. Prevalence of cattle co-infections with pathogen species from the two groups Theleria/Babesia and Anaplasma/Ehrlichia by conventional PCR and sequencing in the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco (total number of co-infections equals 84).
Co-InfectionNumber of PositivesPrevalence (%)
T. annulata, A. phagocytophilum2023.8
T. annulata, A. marginale1619.0
T. buffeli, A. marginale1517.9
T. orientalis, A. marginale910.7
T. annulata, A. capra55.9
T. orientalis, A. capra44.8
T. annulata, A. platys33.6
T. buffeli, A. capra33.6
T. orientalis, A. phagocytophilum33.6
T. annulata, A. bovis22.3
T. buffeli, A. phagocytophilum22.3
T. buffeli, A. bovis11.2
T. orientalis, A. platys11.2
Table
Table 5. Risk factor analysis for infection with A. marginale and T. annulata detected by conventional PCR and sequencing in cattle from the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco.
Table 5. Risk factor analysis for infection with A. marginale and T. annulata detected by conventional PCR and sequencing in cattle from the Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco.
A. marginaleT. annulata
VariableLevelPercentage Infection (Lower, Upper)p-ValuePercentage Infection (Lower, Upper)p-Value
LocationACH58 (44; 71)0.00010 (0; 100)<0.0001
KHM41 (29; 54) 3 (0; 13)
OLM48 (35; 61) 1 (0; 11)
ARB57 (44; 69) 22 (13; 34)
JEM24 (15; 36) 43 (32; 55)
SAY23 (14; 35) 20 (11; 31)
ROM50 (34; 65) 17 (8; 31)
SKH55 (43; 66) 24 (15; 36)
SYZ48 (35; 60) 41 (29; 54)
SexFemale81 (71; 88)<0.00014 (0; 100)0.0001
Male36 (32; 41) 0 (0; 100)
Cow typeBeef80 (72; 87)0.00010 (0; 100)<0.0001
Dairy33 (28; 38) 5 (0; 100)
Farm typeModern75 (67; 82)0.00010 (0; 100)<0.0001
Traditional32 (27; 38) 6 (0; 100)
Health statusHealthy44 (39; 48)0.41213 (0; 100)0.0255
Sick54 (31; 76) 12 (0; 100)
BreedCross-breed47 (42; 53)0.02955 (0; 100)0.0010
Local breed34 (25; 44) 0 (0; 100)
Age −0.007 (0.003)0.02690.002 (0.003)<0.0001
Number of ticks −0.042 (0.020)0.03690.073 (0.022)0.0011
Explanation: (Lower, Upper) gives the lower and upper bound of the 95% confidence interval.
Table
Table 6. Study locations and the number of collected blood samples per location.
Table 6. Study locations and the number of collected blood samples per location.
ZoneStudy LocationsNumber of Blood Samples
Middle Atlas mountainsOuelmes (OLM)65
Ait Ichou (ACH)48
Khemisset (KHM)58
Sub-total 171
The Gharb Plains Jorf El Melha (JEM)56
Sidi Ayach (SAY)57
Arabaoua (ARB)55
Sub-total 168
The Coastal PlainsSkhirat (SKH)60
Sidi Yahya Zaer (SYZ)57
Rommani (ROM)52
Sub-total 169
Total 508
Table
Table 7. Selected primer pairs and annealing temperature for the detection of the mitochondrial target regions for the genera Theleria/Babesia, Anaplasma/Ehrlichia, and Rickettsia primers in cattle from Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco.
Table 7. Selected primer pairs and annealing temperature for the detection of the mitochondrial target regions for the genera Theleria/Babesia, Anaplasma/Ehrlichia, and Rickettsia primers in cattle from Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco.
General TargetForward Primer 5′→3′Reverse Primer 5′→3′Fragment Size (bp)Annealing T (°C)Reference
Theileria/Babesia spp. (18S rRNA) (RLB-F2/R2)GACACAGGGAGGTAGTGACAAGCTAAGAATTTCACCTCTGACAGT460–50058[53]
Anaplasma/Ehrlichia spp. (16S rRNA) (Ehr-16S-D1/R)GGTACCTAYAGAAGAAGTCCTAGCACTCATCGTTTACAGC34554[76]
Rickettsia spp. (16S rRNA) (Rick-F1/R2) GAACGCTATCGGTATGCTTAACACACATCACTCACTCGGTATTGCTGGA350–40060[53]
Abbreviations: T, temperature.
Table
Table 8. GenBank accession numbers assigned to acquired field isolates from Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco.
Table 8. GenBank accession numbers assigned to acquired field isolates from Rabat-Sale-Kenitra region, Morocco.
PathogenAccession Number
Theileria annulataOL305716
Theileria buffeliOL305720
OL305719
OL305723
Theileria orientalisOL305721
OL305718
Babesia bovisOL305722
OL305724
Babesia occultansOL305717
Anaplasma marginaleOK606081
OK606082
Anaplasma phagocytophilumOK606078
OK606088
OK606076
OK606072
OK606077
OK606073
Anaplasma capraOK606083
OK606084
OK606089
Anaplasma platysOK606071
Anaplasma bovisOK606086
OK606085
Bovine Anaplasma sp. OK606070
Ehrlichia minasensisOK606068
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elhachimi, L.; Rogiers, C.; Casaert, S.; Fellahi, S.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Dermauw, W.; Valcárcel, F.; Olmeda, Á.S.; Daminet, S.; Khatat, S.E.H.; et al. Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens Abound in the Cattle Population of the Rabat-Sale Kenitra Region, Morocco. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121594

AMA Style

Elhachimi L, Rogiers C, Casaert S, Fellahi S, Van Leeuwen T, Dermauw W, Valcárcel F, Olmeda ÁS, Daminet S, Khatat SEH, et al. Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens Abound in the Cattle Population of the Rabat-Sale Kenitra Region, Morocco. Pathogens. 2021; 10(12):1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elhachimi, Latifa, Carolien Rogiers, Stijn Casaert, Siham Fellahi, Thomas Van Leeuwen, Wannes Dermauw, Félix Valcárcel, Ángeles Sonia Olmeda, Sylvie Daminet, Sarah El Hamiani Khatat, and et al. 2021. "Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens Abound in the Cattle Population of the Rabat-Sale Kenitra Region, Morocco" Pathogens 10, no. 12: 1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121594

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop