Next Article in Journal
Vascular Changes and Hypoxia in Periodontal Disease as a Link to Systemic Complications
Next Article in Special Issue
Nanomaterial-Based Antifungal Therapies to Combat Fungal Diseases Aspergillosis, Coccidioidomycosis, Mucormycosis, and Candidiasis
Previous Article in Journal
High Mutation Frequency and Significant Population Differentiation in Papaya Ringspot Virus-W Isolates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Importance of Molecular Data to Identify Fungal Plant Pathogens and Guidelines for Pathogenicity Testing Based on Koch’s Postulates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differentiation of Aspergillus flavus from Aspergillus oryzae Targeting the cyp51A Gene

1
Department of Medical Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari 48157-33971, Iran
2
Invasive Fungi Research Center, Communicable Diseases Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari 48157-33971, Iran
3
Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center (MCBRC), Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari 48157-33971, Iran
4
Clinical Center, Microbiology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(10), 1279; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101279
Submission received: 31 August 2021 / Revised: 30 September 2021 / Accepted: 1 October 2021 / Published: 4 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Filamentous Fungal Pathogens)

Abstract

:
Aspergillus flavus is one of the most important agents of invasive and non-invasive aspergillosis, especially in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, including Iran. Aspergillus oryzae is closely related to A. flavus, and it is known for its economic importance in traditional fermentation industries. Reports of infection due to A. oryzae are scarce. Several studies reported that differentiating these two species in clinical laboratories is not possible using MALDI-TOF or by targeting fungal barcode genes, such as Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and β-tubulin (benA). The species-level identification of causative agents and the determination of antifungal susceptibility patterns can play significant roles in the outcome of aspergillosis. Here, we aimed to investigate the discriminatory potential of cyp51A PCR-sequencing versus that of the ITS, benA and calmodulin (CaM) genes for the differentiation of A. flavus from A. oryzae. In a prospective study investigating the molecular epidemiology of A. flavus in Iran between 2008 and 2018, out of 200 clinical isolates of A. flavus, 10 isolates showed >99% similarity to both A. flavus and A. oryzae. Overall, the ITS, β-tubulin and CaM genes did not fulfil the criteria for differentiating these 10 isolates. However, the cyp51A gene showed promising results, which warrants further studies using a larger set of isolates from more diverse epidemiological regions of the world.

1. Introduction

Aspergillus section Flavi comprises 33 phylogenetically distinct species, the majority of which are natural producers of aflatoxins and ochratoxins; among them, A. flavus, Aspergillus tamarri, Aspergillus sojae, Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus nomius are mainly isolated from clinical sources [1]. In different sections of Aspergillus, including section Flavi, there are several cryptic species that, while they may not be distinguishable morphologically, are quite unique in their pathogenesis profile, as well as their patterns of susceptibility to currently available systemic antifungals [2,3]. A. flavus is the most well-known species in section Flavi and a leading cause of severe invasive and non-invasive fungal infections in the Middle Eastern region [4]. The differentiation of A. flavus from A. oryzae is a significant challenge in clinical mycology laboratories, which use conventional mycology, focusing on macroscopic and microscopic characteristics [5], and currently available laboratory-developed tests and commercial proteomic and molecular assays. We previously showed that the Bruker Daltonik matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) database also cannot properly separate A. flavus from A. oryzae [6]. Recent data from whole-genome sequencing studies, however, shed new light on the genome sequences of these species, indicating homogeneity in the genome size of two species (A. flavus: 36.8 Mb, A. oryzae: 36.7 Mb), as well as the presence of the coding genes of many secondary metabolites, such as polyketide synthases and P450 enzymes, with nearly equal numbers [7]. In a computerized analysis of different gene loci, including the Cyp51A sequence, we found nucleotide variations in several locations, which suggested the potential for differentiation between two closely related species, A. flavus and A. oryzae. Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to study the utility of cyp51A in the phylogenetic differentiation of A. flavus from A. oryzae.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Fungal Isolates

In a prospective countrywide molecular epidemiology study between 2008 and 2018 performed at the Invasive Fungi Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran, out of 200 A. flavus, 10 isolates showed >99% similarity to both A. flavus and A. oryzae after PCR-sequencing of the benA gene. These 10 isolates were taken from the sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) of patients from different regions of Iran and with different underlying conditions, including hematological malignancies, organ transplantation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer. These 10 isolates were subject to further work to discriminate between the two mentioned strains based on the PCR sequencing of the benA, ITS, CaM and cyp51A genes using the NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank, accessed on 14 January 2021) and the International Mycological Association-Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (http://www.mycobank.org, accessed on 14 January 2021) databases. The corresponding sequences were submitted to GenBank. Additionally, two standard species, A. oryzae (RIB40) and A. flavus (NRRL3357), were also used to characterize the cyp51A gene sequences. All the isolates were stored at −80 °C in glycerol broth and cultured on potato dextrose agar and/or Sabouraud’s dextrose agar (SDA) supplemented with chloramphenicol for 5–7 days at 35 °C to ensure purity and good sporulation.

2.2. Molecular Identification

2.2.1. DNA Extraction

The total DNA of all the fungal strains was extracted from the surface harvest of colonies cultured on SDA using the methodology described previously (15). A total of 50 μL of sterile distilled water was added and the samples were preserved at −20 °C.

2.2.2. PCR Amplification and Sequences Analysis of the ITS, benA, CaM, and cyp51A Genes

The extracted DNA was used as a template for the amplification of the ITS region of ribosomal DNA using ITS1 primer (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGG AAGTAA-3′) and ITS4 primer (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′); the benA genewas amplified using the BT2a (5′-GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC-3′) and BT2b (5′-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3′) primers; the CaM genewas amplified using the CF1M primer (5-AGGCCGAYTCTYTGACYGA) and CF4 primer (5-TTTYTGCATCATRAGYTGGAC); and, finally, the coding sequences of the cyp51A gene were amplified using forward (5′-CCAGATTAGGCATACACATTG-3′) and reverse (5′-CGCTAACTATGGTTGACTCTA-3′) (1), respectively. The PCR reactions were carried out in 25 µL containing 1 µL of 25 pmol of each primer, 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 400 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 2 µL genomic DNA, and water. Table 1 demonstrates the PCR cycling steps for the four genes.
The benA and CaM PCR products were sequenced using only one primer. The cyp51A gene and ITS region PCR products were sequenced from both directions using an automated DNA Sequencer (ABI PRISM_ABI-3730 Genetic Analyzer; PE Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences of the cyp51A gene were assembled and edited with a DNA Sequence Assembler (version 5.15) (http://www.dnabaser.com/download/DNA-Baser-sequence assembler/how%20to%20 download.html, accessed on 14 January 2021) and the CLC Genomics Workbench software package (CLC Bio, Qiagen, Aarhus, Denmark), aligned with reference strains and compared with each other; finally, a phylogenetic tree was constructed with the UPGMA method using MEGA software (version 10.1) (https://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 14 January 2021) and 1000 bootstraps. The comparative sequence analyses were performed by using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website.

3. Results

3.1. Comparison of ITS Region, benA, CaM and cyp51A Genes

3.1.1. ITS Region

The ITS region of total isolates was successfully amplified by universal primer pairs (ITS1 and ITS4) and generated PCR products with a size of 1200 bp. Bioinformatics analysis, which was performed by comparing the sequence results of the ITS region with sequence data registered in the NCBI nucleotide Blast (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 14 January 2021), indicated that the ITS identified both species (A. flavus and A. oryzae) equally (similarity index: 99.55%). As a result, the ITS region could not properly distinguish these two species. Therefore, all 10 isolates were reported as A. flavus/A. oryzae (Table 2).

3.1.2. β-Tubulin Gene

The β-tubulin genes of all the isolates were partially amplified by universal primer pairs (Bt2a and Bt2b) and created PCR products with a size of 550 bp. The data obtained from the sequences provided consistent identification at the species level of only two out of the ten isolates tested. The two isolates with a 100% similarity rate were identified as A. flavus and the others were identified as A. flavus/A. oryzae (Table 2).

3.1.3. CaM Gene

The calmodulin genes of the tested isolates were amplified by two primers, CF1M and CF4, and created products with a size of 560 bp. The CaM gene correctly identified three isolates as A. flavus, with similarity rates of 100%, 99.28% and 99.61%, respectively. Two isolates were identified as A. flavus/A. oryzae. The remaining A. oryzae isolates (n = 5, accession Nos. MZ291480, MZ291483, MZ291487, MZ291492, and MZ291493) were misidentified as A. flavus (Table 2).

3.1.4. cyp51A Gene

The coding sequences of the cyp51A genes of all the strains were amplified by a size of 1542 bp (Figure 1A); the sequences were submitted to the GenBank and registered as accession numbers (MW558954–MW558963) (Table 2). The comparison of nucleotide sequences with sequences registered in the GenBank as standard strains of A. flavus (NW_2477238) and A. oryzae (RIB40), revealed that the cyp51A gene could assist us in separating the species-level identifications of these 10 isolates. The alignment of the nucleotide sequences of the cyp51A gene from the 10 tested isolates with standard strains showed four regions with nucleotide variations, located in 613, 1083, 1386 and 1389 (Figure 1A). In the cyp51A gene, the A. flavus isolates (NW_2477238, MW558954, MW558955, MW558956, MW558957, and MW558958) harbored four single polymorphisms (SNPs) at position 613 (G), 1083 (C) 1386 (C), and 1389 (G), whereas all the strains with SNPs at position 613 (A), 1083 (T), 1386 (T), and 1389 (A) were related to the A. oryzae isolates (RIB40, P2, P5, P8, P11 and p16) (Figure 1A). Accordingly, five isolates that were not separated with benA, CaM and ITS markers were classified as A. flavus (accession Nos. MW558954, MW558955, MW558956, MW558957, and MW558958), resulting in a 100% similarity to the A. flavus standard strain (NW_2477238), while the remaining isolates showed a 100% similarity to the A. oryzae standard strain (RIB40) and were categorized as A. oryzae (MW558959, MW558960, MW558961, MW558962, and MW558963) (Table 2). The predicted cDNA (10542 bp) of the cyp51A gene encoded a 514-amino acid protein, in which one nonsynonymous mutation at position 205 was detected (Figure 1B). All the A. flavus isolates harbored Alanine (A) in this position, while Threonine (T) was located in A. oryzae (Figure 1B).

3.2. Phylogenetic Diversity

The phylogenetic analysis derived from the cyp51A gene sequences constructed using the UPGMA method revealed two clades. Clade 1 clearly represented all the A. oryzae isolates (MW558959–MW558963) adjacent to the reference strain (RIB40) and clade 2 markedly consisted of all the A. flavus isolates (MW558954–MW558958) next to the standard strain (NRRL3357) (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Given the worldwide increase in IA cases [8], it is crucial to identify the causative agent of disease at species level as these species may tend towards a certain geographical location or climate. Overall, different species of Aspergillus have unique antifungal susceptibility patterns, which is essential for recommending the appropriate antifungal treatment. Aspergillus fumigatus is the principal agent of IA in the most parts of the world; however, it was recently concluded that A. flavus has the potential to become the leading agent of IA in tropical regions, as it can adapt to climatic conditions in Asia and Africa [9]. According to a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, A. flavus was introduced as the most common species isolated from IA patients in Iran [10]. A. oryzae, on the other hand, is widely used in traditional fermentation industries but has significant similarities to A. flavus, both morphologically and in its ITS and benA gene profiles [5]. The role of A. oryzae in human infections was reported only as the causative agent of aspergillosis in a few cases [11,12]. Recent studies showed homogeneity in the whole-genome size of the two species and also revealed the presence of the coding genes of many secondary metabolites, such as polyketide synthases and p450 enzymes, with nearly equal numbers [7]. Polyphasic approaches were recommended as the gold standard for the classification of Aspergillus species because the reliance on a singular morphology or molecular-based identification methods has largely failed to identify closely related species [13,14]. Despite significant efforts and the use of a variety of techniques, including phenotypic characteristics, molecular approaches and, most recently, MALDI-TOF, the separation of A. flavus and A. oryzae is yet to be achieved successfully. Multi-locus sequencing was presented as an efficient tool to properly understand the phylogenetic relations among Aspergillus species [15]. The evaluation of findings based on ITS regions sequencing, known as the standard barcoding target in filamentous fungi, was the first step in the majority of studies related to Aspergillus species identification [16,17]. As shown in Table 2, the PCR sequencing of the ITS region identified A. flavus and A. oryzae with the same coefficient ratio (99/55%) and failed to discriminate between the two closely related species. The effectiveness of CaM in discriminating between Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus tubingensis, which belong to the Aspergillus Section Nigri was reported [18]. CaM has also been reported as an efficient marker in distinguishing between A. fumigatus and Aspergillus lentulus, two closely related species [19]. In our study, the partial sequences of the CaM gene showed that, with the exception of the two isolates (MZ291491 and MZ291495), eight isolates were identified as A. flavus, with an identification rate lower than 100%. Therefore, an easy-to-use, accurate, rapid, and cost-effective approach for differentiating the two species was still needed. Our results highlight that the cyp51A gene can be considered as a potential discriminative genetic marker in the differentiation between A. flavus and A. oryzae. The cyp51 gene plays a proven role in the synthesis of ergosterol and is used as a key element in studies of azole resistance mechanisms in various fungi [20]. In fungi, mutations in cyp51 cause resistance to azoles, a class of drugs that are used to treat invasive mycoses in mammals and in plants. This gene demonstrated highly conserved characteristic motifs, but very low overall sequence similarities; thus, it may be a promising target with which to find nucleotide variations [21,22,23]. The use of the cyp51 gene in studies focused on fungal diversity is uncommon; however, our primary evaluation revealed that this gene could be reliable and helpful in the discrimination between A. flavus and A. oryzae. To assess the cyp51A gene’s ability in species identification, we first performed a qualitative PCR assay, which revealed that the cyp51A gene can separate A. flavus and A. oryzae from other aspergilli. Although A. flavus and A. oryzae produced sharp specific bands on electrophoresis panels, A. fumigatus and A. niger did not (Figure 3).
The cyp51A gene’s PCR products were also sequenced for each of the ten isolates. It demonstrated a novel and valuable performance in the field of evolutionary divergence under its own name, fully distinguishing between two very similar species, A. flavus and A. oryzae, with a 100% identification score (Table 2). A closer inspection of a partial cyp51A gene sequence alignment (1542 ntds) from ten isolates of A. flavus and A. oryzae, along with two standard isolates of both species, detected SNPs in four positions (Figure 1A). These findings provide significant value to support the strong genetic homology of A. flavus and A. oryzae.

5. Conclusions

Based on our findings, we suggest that the cyp51A gene is a promising target for the differentiation of A. flavus from A. oryzae. One limitation of the current study was that we only tested a small number of isolates from Iran. To rule out the effects of geographical variation, a larger set of isolates need to be tested before a solid conclusion can be made. The examination of a list of clinical and environmental isolates from different regions of the world mainly tropical and sub-tropical areas could be a useful addition to the publicly available databases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.H. and M.A.; methodology, S.N., S.M. and S.S.; molecular analysis, S.N., R.V. and J.-H.Y.; writing—original draft, S.N.; writing—review and editing, M.T.H. and S.S.; supervision, M.T.H., M.A. and S.S.; funding acquisition, M.T.H. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Invasive Fungi Research Center of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran, grant number 1597. The work of S.S. was supported by a research fund from the National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (protocol code IR.MAZUMS.REC.1398.985).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

All other authors declared no potential conflict of interest of this article.

Abbreviations

MALDI-TOF MSmatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
benAβ-tubulin
ITSInternal Transcribed Spacer
CaMcalmodulin
BALbronchoalveolar lavage fluid
PCRpolymerase chain reaction
DWdistilled water
BLASTBasic Local Alignment Search Tool
NCBINational Center for Biotechnology Information
SPsputum
IAinvasive aspergillosis
SNPsingle nucleotide polymorphism

References

  1. Frisvad, J.C.; Hubka, V.; Ezekiel, C.; Hong, S.-B.; Nováková, A.; Chen, A.; Arzanlou, M.; Larsen, T.; Sklenář, F.; Mahakarnchanakul, W. Taxonomy of Aspergillus section Flavi and their production of aflatoxins, ochratoxins and other mycotoxins. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 93, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kjærbølling, I.; Vesth, T.; Frisvad, J.C.; Nybo, J.L.; Theobald, S.; Kildgaard, S.; Petersen, T.I.; Kuo, A.; Sato, A.; Lyhne, E.K. A comparative genomics study of 23 Aspergillus species from section Flavi. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gonçalves, S.S.; Stchigel, A.M.; Cano, J.; Guarro, J.; Colombo, A.L. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinically relevant species belonging to Aspergillus section Flavi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 1944–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hedayati, M.T.; Armaki, M.T.; Charati, J.Y.; Hedayati, N.; Seyedmousavi, S.; Denning, D.W. Burden of fungal infections in Iran. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2018, 12, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chang, P.K.; Ehrlich, K.C. What does genetic diversity of Aspergillus flavus tell us about Aspergillus oryzae? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 138, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hedayati, M.T.; Taghizadeh-Armaki, M.; Zarrinfar, H.; Hoseinnejad, A.; Ansari, S.; Abastabar, M.; Er, H.; Özhak, B.; Öğünç, D.; Ilkit, M. Discrimination of Aspergillus flavus from Aspergillus oryzae by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Mycoses 2019, 62, 1182–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Payne, G.; Nierman, W.; Wortman, J.; Pritchard, B.; Brown, D.; Dean, R.; Bhatnagar, D.; Cleveland, T.; Machida, M.; Yu, J. Whole genome comparison of Aspergillus flavus and A. oryzae. Med. Mycol. 2006, 44, S9–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chakrabarti, A.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Das, A.; Shivaprakash, M.R. Invasive aspergillosis in developing countries. Med. Mycol. 2011, 49, S35–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Rudramurthy, S.M.; Paul, R.A.; Chakrabarti, A.; Mouton, J.W.; Meis, J.F. Invasive aspergillosis by Aspergillus flavus: Epidemiology, diagnosis, antifungal resistance, and management. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Tavakoli, M.; Yazdani Charati, J.; Hedayati, M.T.; Moosazadeh, M.; Badiee, P.; Seyedmousavi, S.; Denning, D.W. National trends in incidence, prevalence and disability-adjusted life years of invasive aspergillosis in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2019, 13, 1121–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mazza, A.; Luciani, N.; Luciani, M.; Cammertoni, F.; Giaquinto, A.; Pavone, N.; Bruno, P.; Massetti, M. Fungal Endocarditis Due to Aspergillus oryzae: The First Case Reported in the Literature. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2017, 26, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Wilson, M.R.; O’Donovan, B.D.; Gelfand, J.M.; Sample, H.A.; Chow, F.C.; Betjemann, J.P.; Shah, M.P.; Richie, M.B.; Gorman, M.P.; Hajj-Ali, R.A. Chronic meningitis investigated via metagenomic next-generation sequencing. JAMA Neurol. 2018, 75, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. McClenny, N. Laboratory detection and identification of Aspergillus species by microscopic observation and culture: The traditional approach. Med. Mycol. 2005, 43, S125–S128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Balajee, S.; Houbraken, J.; Verweij, P.; Hong, S.; Yaghuchi, T.; Varga, J.; Samson, R. Aspergillus species identification in the clinical setting. Stud. Mycol. 2007, 59, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Geiser, D.; Klich, M.; Frisvad, J.C.; Peterson, S.; Varga, J.; Samson, R.A. The current status of species recognition and identification in Aspergillus. Stud. Mycol. 2007, 59, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Henry, T.; Iwen, P.C.; Hinrichs, S.H. Identification of Aspergillus species using internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1510–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Makhlouf, J.; Carvajal-Campos, A.; Querin, A.; Tadrist, S.; Puel, O.; Lorber, S.; Oswald, I.P.; Hamze, M.; Bailly, J.-D.; Bailly, S. Morphologic, molecular and metabolic characterization of Aspergillus section Flavi in spices marketed in Lebanon. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Susca, A.; Stea, G.; Mulé, G.; Perrone, G. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) identification of Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus tubingensis based on the calmodulin gene. Food Addit. Contam. 2007, 24, 1154–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yu, S.-Y.; Guo, L.-N.; Xiao, M.; Zhou, M.-L.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Sun, T.-S.; Ning, Y.-T.; Jia, P.-Y. Clinical and Microbiological Characterization of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Caused by Aspergillus lentulus in China. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Lv, Q.; Yan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y. The fungal CYP51s: Their functions, structures, related drug resistance, and inhibitors. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zeng, Z.; Wu, Q.; He, B.; Zeng, B. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Cytochromes P450 Gene Family in Aspergillus oryzae. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Bari, Italy, 11–13 October 2018; pp. 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shin, J.; Kim, J.-E.; Lee, Y.-W.; Son, H. Fungal cytochrome P450s and the P450 complement (CYPome) of Fusarium graminearum. Toxins 2018, 10, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chen, W.; Lee, M.-K.; Jefcoate, C.; Kim, S.-C.; Chen, F.; Yu, J.-H. Fungal cytochrome p450 monooxygenases: Their distribution, structure, functions, family expansion, and evolutionary origin. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 1620–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences (A) and amino acid sequences (B) of cyp51A gene of A. flavus and A. oryzae.
Figure 1. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences (A) and amino acid sequences (B) of cyp51A gene of A. flavus and A. oryzae.
Pathogens 10 01279 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of A. flavus and A. oryzae used in this study. A. tubingensis was used as the outgroup strain.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of A. flavus and A. oryzae used in this study. A. tubingensis was used as the outgroup strain.
Pathogens 10 01279 g002
Figure 3. Gel electrophoresis of cyp51A gene PCR products.
Figure 3. Gel electrophoresis of cyp51A gene PCR products.
Pathogens 10 01279 g003
Table 1. Thermocycler program for PCR reaction of ITS, benA, CaM, and cyp51A.
Table 1. Thermocycler program for PCR reaction of ITS, benA, CaM, and cyp51A.
PhasePrimerTemperatureTime
Initial DenaturationITS94 °C5′
benA95 °C5′
CaM94 °C5′
cyp51A94 °C7′
DenaturationITS95 °C30″
benA94 °C45″
CaM95 °C30″
cyp51A94 °C30″
AnnealingITS52 °C60″
benA60 °C45″
CaM60 °C60″
cyp51A52 °C30″
ExtensionITS72 °C2′
benA72 °C1′
CaM72 °C1′
cyp51A72 °C2′
Final ExtensionITS72 °C7′
benA72 °C6′
CaM72 °C7′
cyp51A72 °C7′
Cycle (Χ)ITSbenACaMcyp51A
28353035
Table 2. Identification rate of ITS, BenA, CaM and cyp51A genes. SP: sputum; BAL: Bronchoalveolar lavage.
Table 2. Identification rate of ITS, BenA, CaM and cyp51A genes. SP: sputum; BAL: Bronchoalveolar lavage.
Sample CodeSourceBenA Gene
(Accession Number)
ITS
(Accession Number)
CaM Gene
(Accession Number)
cyp51A Gene
(Accession Number)
1BAL100% A. flavus
(MZ305275)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055458)
99.48% A. flavus, 99.48% A. oryzae
(MZ291495)
100% A. flavus
(MW558954)
2BAL100% A. flavus, 100% A. oryzae
(MZ305264)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055461)
100% A. flavus
(MZ291482)
100% A. flavus
(MW558955)
3SP100% A. flavus, 100% A. oryzae
(MZ305267)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055465)
99.28% A. flavus
(MZ291484)
100% A. flavus
(MW558956)
4BAL100% A. flavus
(MZ305269)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055460)
99.61% A. flavus
(MZ291489)
100% A. flavus
(MW558957)
5BAL100% A. flavus, 100% A. oryzae
(MZ305271)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055468)
99.65% A. flavus, 99.65% A. oryzae
(MZ291491)
100% A. flavus
(MW558958)
6SP100% A. flavus, 100% A. oryzae
(MZ305262)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055459)
98.99% A. flavus
(MZ291480)
100% A. oryzae
(MW558959)
7BAL100% A. flavus, 100% A. oryzae
(MZ305265)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055462)
99.65% A. flavus
(MZ291483)
100% A. oryzae
(MW558960)
8SP100% A. flavus, 100% A. oryzae
(MZ305263)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055466)
96.93% A. flavus
(MZ291487)
100% A. oryzae
(MW558961)
9BAL100% A. flavus
(MZ305273)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055467)
100% A. flavus
(MZ291493)
100% A. oryzae
(MW558962)
10SP100% A. flavus
(MZ305272)
99.55% A. flavus, 99.55% A. oryzae
(MZ055469)
97.82% A. flavus
(MZ291492)
100% A. oryzae
(MW558963)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nargesi, S.; Abastabar, M.; Valadan, R.; Mayahi, S.; Youn, J.-H.; Hedayati, M.T.; Seyedmousavi, S. Differentiation of Aspergillus flavus from Aspergillus oryzae Targeting the cyp51A Gene. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101279

AMA Style

Nargesi S, Abastabar M, Valadan R, Mayahi S, Youn J-H, Hedayati MT, Seyedmousavi S. Differentiation of Aspergillus flavus from Aspergillus oryzae Targeting the cyp51A Gene. Pathogens. 2021; 10(10):1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nargesi, Sanaz, Mahdi Abastabar, Reza Valadan, Sabah Mayahi, Jung-Ho Youn, Mohammad Taghi Hedayati, and Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi. 2021. "Differentiation of Aspergillus flavus from Aspergillus oryzae Targeting the cyp51A Gene" Pathogens 10, no. 10: 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop