- freely available
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(3), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8030099
2. Literature Review
3.1. Sampling Procedure
3.2. Survey Instrument Development
Conflicts of Interest
- Anderson, Daniel, and Heather Kirkorian. 2006. Attention and television. In Psychology of Entertainment. Edited by J. Bryant and P. Vorderer. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 35–54. [Google Scholar]
- Carpenter, Jordan M., and Melanie C. Green. 2012. Flying with Icarus: Narrative transportation and the persuasiveness of entertainment. In The Psychology of Entertainment Media: Blurring the Lines between Entertainment and Persuasion. Edited by L. J. Shrum. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 169–94. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, Mary. 2012. Can’t Stop Won’t Stop: In Praise of Binge TV Consumption. Wired 20. Available online: https://www.wired.com/2011/12/pl_column_tvseries/ (accessed on 14 March 2019).
- Deloitte. 2018. Digital democracy survey: A multi-generational view of consumer technology, media and telecom trends. In Digital Democracy Survey, 9th ed. Oakland: Deloitte Development LLC. [Google Scholar]
- Downey, Andrea. 2018. Binge Watching Leaves You Anxious, Stressed and Lonely. Available online: https://nypost.com/2018/02/27/binge-watching-leaves-you-anxious-stressed-and-lonely/ (accessed on 3 September 2018).
- Erickson, Sarah E., Sonya Dal Cin, and Hannah Byl. 2019. An Experimental Examination of Binge Watching and Narrative Engagement. Social Sciences 8: 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firger, Jessica. 2015. Depression, Loneliness Linked to Binge-Watching TV. Available online: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/depression-loneliness-linked-to-binge-watching-television/ (accessed on 14 March 2019).
- Green, Samuel B. 1991. How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 26: 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, Melanie C., and Timothy C. Brock. 2000. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 701–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, Melanie C., Timothy C. Brock, and Geoff F. Kaufman. 2004. Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory 14: 311–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gregoire, Carolyn. 2015. Binge-Watching Netflix Is Making You Feel Lonely and Depressed | HuffPost. Available online: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/31/tv-depression_n_6570664.html (accessed on 3 September 2018).
- Hayes, Andrew F. 2009. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Communication Monographs 76: 408–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, Michael. 2014. How to Overcome a Binge-Watching Addiction. Available online: http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-to-overcome-a-binge-watching-addiction-1411748602 (accessed on 14 March 2019).
- Jenner, Mareike. 2014. Is this TVIV? On Netflix, TVIII and binge-watching. New Media & Society 18: 257–73. [Google Scholar]
- Katz, Elihu, Jay G. Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch. 1973. Uses and Gratifications Research. The Public Opinion Quarterly. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2747854 (accessed on 14 March 2019).
- Lindley, Craig. 2005. The semiotics of time structure in ludic space as a foundation for analysis and design. Game Studies 1. [Google Scholar]
- Lotz, Amanda. 2014. The Television Will Be Revolutionized, 2nd ed. New York: NYU Press. [Google Scholar]
- Majkut, Paul. 2005. Meta TV. In Phenomenology 2005, Vol. 5, Selected Essays from North America. Edited by Lester Embree and Thomas Nenon. Bucharest: Zeta Books, pp. 325–439. [Google Scholar]
- McNamara, M. 2012. The side effects of binge television. Los Angeles Times. Available online: http://lat.ms/1OYpEAG (accessed on 19 March 2019).
- Merrill, Kelly, Jr., and Bridget Rubenking. 2019. Go Long or Go Often: Influences on Binge Watching Frequency and Duration among College Students. Social Sciences 8: 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Carroll, Ronan E., Eamonn Ferguson, Peter C. Hayes, and Lee Shepherd. 2012. Increasing organ donation via anticipated regret (INORDAR): Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 12: 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perks, Lisa. 2015. Media Marathoning: Immersions in Morality. Lanham: Lexington Books. [Google Scholar]
- Petersen, T. 2016. To binge or not to binge: A qualitative analysis of binge watching habits of college students. Florida Communication Journal 44: 77–88. [Google Scholar]
- Pierce-Grove, Ri. 2017. Just one more: How journalists frame binge watching. First Monday. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pittman, Matthew, and Kim Sheehan. 2015. Sprinting a Media Marathon: Uses and Gratifications of Binge-Watching Television through Netflix. First Monday. Available online: http://uncommonculture.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6138 (accessed on 14 March 2019). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pittman, Matthew, and Alec C. Tefertiller. 2015. With or without you: Connected viewing and co-viewing Twitter activity for traditional appointment and asynchronous broadcast television models. First Monday. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, Michael, D. L. Larso, Allison Harthcock, and K. B. Nellis. 2002. Re(de)fining narrative events: Examining television narrative structure. Journal of Popular Film and Television 30: 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rammstedt, Beatrice, and Oliver P. John. 2007. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German We wish to thank the Cen-ter for Survey Research and Methodologies (ZUMA) for making possible a guest professorship in Mannheim for. Journal of Research in Personality 41: 203–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubenking, Bridget. 2017. Boring is bad: Effects of emotional content and multitasking on enjoyment and memory. Computers in Human Behavior 72: 488–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubenking, Bridget, and Cheryl Campanella Bracken. 2018. Binge-Watching: A Suspenseful, Emotional, Habit. Communication Research Reports 35: 381–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubenking, Bridget, Cheryl Campanella Bracken, Jennifer Sandoval, and Alex Rister. 2018. Defining new viewing behaviours: What makes and motivates TV binge-watching? International Journal of Digital Television 9: 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schweidel, David, and Wendy Moe. 2016. Binge watching and advertising. Journal of Marketing 80: 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheehan, Kim Bartel, and Matthew Pittman. 2016. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for Academics: The HIT Handbook for Social Science Research. Irvine: Melvin & Leigh, Publishers. [Google Scholar]
- Sohn, Myeong-Ho, and John R. Anderson. 2001. Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130: 764–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steiner, Emil. 2017. Binge-Watching in practice: The rituals, motives, and feelings of streaming video viewers. In The Age of Netflix: Critical Essays on Streaming Media, Digital Delivery, and Instant Access. Edited by Cory Barker and Myc Wiatrowski. Jefferson: McFarland, pp. 141–61. [Google Scholar]
- Steiner, Emil. 2018. Binge-Watching Killed the Idiot Box: The Changing Identities of Viewers and Television in the Experiential, Streaming Video Age. Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Retrieved from ProQuest. (10813061). [Google Scholar]
- Steiner, Emil, and Kun Xu. 2018. Binge-watching motivates change. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stelter, Brian. 2013. New Way to Deliver a Drama. New York Times. Available online: https://nyti.ms/2m70bx1 (accessed on 19 March 2019).
- Strangelove, Michael. 2015. Post-TV: Piracy, Cord-cutting, and the Future of Television. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division. [Google Scholar]
- Sundar, S. Shyman, and Anthony M. Limperos. 2013. Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57: 504–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, Yoon Hi, Eun Yeon Kang, and Wei-Na Lee. 2018. Why Do We Indulge? Exploring Motivations for Binge Watching. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 62: 408–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taatgen, Niels, and Frank Lee. 2003. Production Compilation: A Simple Mechanism to Model Complex Skill Acquisition. Human Factors 45: 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tefertiller, Alec. 2018. Media Substitution in Cable Cord-Cutting: The Adoption of Web-Streaming Television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 62: 390–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tryon, Chuck. 2015. TV got better: Netflix’s original programming strategies and binge viewing. Media Industries Journal 2: 104–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Laer, Tom, Ko De Ruyter, Luca M. Visconti, and Martin Wetzels. 2013. The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research 40: 797–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanvoorhis, Carmen R. Wilson, and Betsy L. Morgan. 2007. Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 3: 43–50. Available online: http://mail.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol03-2/p043/p043.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2019). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Zheng, and John M. Tchernev. 2012. The “Myth” of Media Multitasking: Reciprocal Dynamics of Media Multitasking, Personal Needs, and Gratifications. Journal of Communication 62: 492–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, Raymond. 1974. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Wolters, Larry. 1955. Program boss takes a look into future. Chicago Daily Tribune, December 11. [Google Scholar]
- Zillig, Lisa M. Pytlik, Scott H. Hemenover, and Richard A. Dienstbier. 2002. What Do We Assess when We Assess a Big 5 Trait? A Content Analysis of the Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Processes Represented in Big 5 Personality Inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 847–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|1. Binge||—||0.054||0.123 ***||0.064||−0.101 **||−0.213 ***||0.100 **||−0.102 **|
|2. NC||—||0.552 ***||0.029||0.061||0.087 *||−0.055||0.022|
|4. Extra||—||0.239 ***||0.147 ***||−0.365 ***||0.011|
|5. Agree||—||0.261 ***||−0.337 ***||0.069|
|6. Consc||—||−0.362 ***||0.181 ***|
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).