The Eurozone Crisis: Psychological Mechanisms Undermining and Supporting European Solidarity
- Through which theories can we understand the negative perceptions of European nations’ citizens towards others and the current developments towards nationalism?
- How can we draw on these theories to develop mechanisms which could help to (re)unite European citizens and establish a positive European identity?
2. Intergroup Conflict—or Why Europe Remains National
2.1. Resource Conflicts: The EU as an IOU?
2.2. “Us and Them”: Nations through a Social Identity Lens
3. Nations within Europe—An Ingroup Projection Perspective
4. Towards Solidarity
Conflicts of Interest
- Ian Traynor. “Switzerland backs immigration quotas by slim margin.” The Guardian. 10 February 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/09/swiss-referendum-immigration-quotas.
- Benjamin Fox. “Greece hoping for peaceful launch of EU presidency.” EUobserver. 8 January 2014. http://euobserver.com/news/122654.
- Jamie Bartlett, and Jonathan Birdwell. “Populism poses a real threat to the mainstream.” Available online: http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/thefarrightineurope (accessed on 5 March 2014).
- “The new Sick Man of Europe the European Union.” Pew Research Centre. 13 May 2013. http://www.pewglobal.org/2013/05/13/the-new-sick-man-of-europe-the-european-union/.
- “European unity on the rocks. Greeks and Germans at Polar Opposites.” Pew Research Centre. 29 May 2012. http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/05/29/european-unity-on-the-rocks/.
- Sarah F. Brosnan, and Frans B.M. de Waal. “Monkeys reject unequal pay.” Nature 425 (2003): 297–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richard T. Schaefer. Racial and Ethnic Groups. London, UK: Pearson Education, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Walter. G. Runciman. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Muzafer Sherif, O. J. Harvey, B. Jack White, William R. Hood, and Carolyn W. Sherif. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Michael Billig. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage Publications, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Henri Tajfel, and John C. Turner. “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.” In The social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Edited by William G. Austin and Stephen Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- John C. Turner, Michael A. Hogg, Penelope J. Oakes, Stephen D. Reicher, and Margaret S. Wetherell. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Antonis Sapountzis. “Towards a critical social psychological account of national sentiments: Patriotism and nationalism revisited.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2, no. 1 (2008): 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rupert Emerson. From Empire to Nation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Victoria Esses, Ulrich Wagner, Carina Wolf, Mathias Preiser, and Christopher J. Wilbur. “Perceptions of national identity and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration in Canada and Germany.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 30 (2006): 653–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar Yogeeswaran, Nilanjana Dasgupta, and Cristian Gomez. “A new American dilemma? The effect of ethnic identification and public service on the national inclusion of ethnic minorities.” European Journal of Social Psychology 42 (2012): 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonie Huddy, and Nadia Khatib. “American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement.” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 1 (2007): 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laurent Licata, and Olivier Klein. “Does European citizenship breed xenophobia? European identification as a predictor of intolerance towards immigrants.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 12 (2002): 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laurent Licata. “Representing the future of the European Union: Consequences on national and European identifications.” Papers on Social Representation 12 (2003): 5.1–5.22. [Google Scholar]
- Olivier Klein, Laurent Licata, Assaas E. Azzi, and Ioanna Durala. “How European am I? Prejudice Expression and the Presentation of Social Identity.” Self and Identity 2 (2003): 251–64. [Google Scholar]
- Antonis. Sapountzis, Lia Figgou, Pavlos Pantazis, Giorgos Laskaridis, Dimitra Papastavrou, Nikos Bozatzis, and Antonis Gardikitios. “Immigration and European Integration in Greece: Greek National Identity and the ‘Other Within’.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 3 (2006): 27–47. [Google Scholar]
- Adam Rutland, Marco Cinnirella, and Rhona Simpson. “Stability and Variability in National and European Self-Identification.” European Psychologist 13 (2008): 267–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam Rutland, and Marco Cinnirella. “Context effects on Scottish national and European self-categorization: The importance of category accessibility, fragility and relations.” British Journal of Social Psychology 39 (2000): 495–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marco Cinnirella. “Toward a European identity? Interactions between the national and European social identities manifested by university students in Britain and Italy.” British Journal of Social Psychology 36 (1997): 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emmanuel Sigalas. “Cross-border mobility and European identity: The effectiveness of intergroup contact during the ERASMUS year abroad.” European Union Politics 11 (2010): 241–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Development Programme. “Human Development Index (HDI).” Available online: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/hdi (accessed on 5 March 2014).
- Michael Wenzel, Amelie Mummendey, and Sven Waldzus. “Superordinate identities and Intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model.” European Review of Social Psychology 18 (2007): 331–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amelie Mummendey, and Michael Wenzel. “Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3 (1999): 158–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sven Waldzus, Amelie Mummendey, Michael Wenzel, and Franziska Boettcher. “Of bikers, teachers and Germans: Groups’ diverging views about their prototypicality.” British Journal of Social Psychology 43 (2004): 385–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michael Wenzel, Amelie Mummendey, Ulrike Weber, and Sven Waldzus. “The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (2003): 46–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roland Imhoff, Ron Dotsch, Mauro Bianchi, Rainer Banse, and Daniel H. J. Wigboldus. “Facing Europe: Visualizing spontaneous ingroup projection.” Psychological Science 22 (2011): 1583–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mauro Bianchi, Amelie Mummendey, Melanie C. Steffens, and Vincent Y. Yzerbyt. “What do you mean by “European”? Evidence of spontaneous ingroup projection.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (2010): 960–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nurcan Ensari, and Norman Miller. “Decategorization and the reduction of bias in the crossed categorization paradigm.” European Journal of Social Psychology 31 (2001): 193–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sven Waldzus, Amelie Mummendey, Michael Wenzel, and Ulrike Weber. “Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 (2003): 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anne Berthold, Carola Leicht, Nicole Methner, and Petra Gaum. “Seeing the world with the eyes of the outgroup—The impact of perspective taking on the prototypicality of the ingroup relative to the outgroup.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (2013): 1034–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Reese, G.; Lauenstein, O. The Eurozone Crisis: Psychological Mechanisms Undermining and Supporting European Solidarity. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3, 160-171. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010160
Reese G, Lauenstein O. The Eurozone Crisis: Psychological Mechanisms Undermining and Supporting European Solidarity. Social Sciences. 2014; 3(1):160-171. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010160Chicago/Turabian Style
Reese, Gerhard, and Oliver Lauenstein. 2014. "The Eurozone Crisis: Psychological Mechanisms Undermining and Supporting European Solidarity" Social Sciences 3, no. 1: 160-171. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010160