Next Article in Journal
Development and Preliminary Validation of a Tool to Assess Trainee Teachers’ Perceptions and Use of Digital Sources in a Historical-Thinking Framework: A Conflict Context in Chile
Previous Article in Journal
Climate-Related Content on Iberian Fact-Checking Platforms: Topics, Entities and Factual Authority in Polígrafo and Maldita
Previous Article in Special Issue
Confronting Police Sexual Violence, Envisioning Collective Healing: Methodological Contributions of a Survivor-Centered, Community-Based Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Marginalized Voices, Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Community Media: A Complexity Framework for Community-Engaged Research in Contentious Times

by
Sundeep R. Muppidi
Digital Media and Journalism, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(9), 630; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15090630
Submission received: 26 June 2026 / Revised: 28 August 2026 / Accepted: 7 September 2026 / Published: 16 September 2026

Abstract

Amid rising authoritarianism, the criminalization of dissent, and the erasure of indigenous expertise from policy discourse, this paper examines community-engaged research as critical public scholarship through the Deccan Development Society’s (DDS) four-decade-plus collaboration with approximately 5000 Dalit and indigenous women farmers in Telangana, India. Against a backdrop of shrinking civic space and technocratic development agendas that delegitimize marginalized knowledge, DDS women’s sanghams have consolidated village-level assemblies into organs of local governance that claim autonomy over land, seed, food, and knowledge—positioning marginalized women as producers of evidence and theory rather than mere data sources. Drawing on complexity theory and participatory action research (PAR), this paper theorizes a community-based inquiry model where marginalized women operate as co-researchers, knowledge producers, and media creators within an emergent system characterized by distributed agency and non-hierarchical information flows. The paper interrogates key methodological, ethical, and political dynamics of critical community-based inquiry for justice and animates the concept of “autonomy as counter-policy” as a contribution to engaged scholarship and epistemic justice.
Keywords: community-engaged research; indigenous knowledge systems; participatory action research; complexity theory; community media; food sovereignty; epistemic justice; counter-narrative; seed sovereignty; Deccan Development Society community-engaged research; indigenous knowledge systems; participatory action research; complexity theory; community media; food sovereignty; epistemic justice; counter-narrative; seed sovereignty; Deccan Development Society

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muppidi, S.R. Marginalized Voices, Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Community Media: A Complexity Framework for Community-Engaged Research in Contentious Times. Soc. Sci. 2026, 15, 630. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15090630

AMA Style

Muppidi SR. Marginalized Voices, Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Community Media: A Complexity Framework for Community-Engaged Research in Contentious Times. Social Sciences. 2026; 15(9):630. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15090630

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muppidi, Sundeep R. 2026. "Marginalized Voices, Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Community Media: A Complexity Framework for Community-Engaged Research in Contentious Times" Social Sciences 15, no. 9: 630. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15090630

APA Style

Muppidi, S. R. (2026). Marginalized Voices, Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Community Media: A Complexity Framework for Community-Engaged Research in Contentious Times. Social Sciences, 15(9), 630. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15090630

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop