Next Article in Journal
Determinants of Sports Participation in Japan: The Interplay of Sociodemographic Factors, Social Roles, and Behavioral Change
Previous Article in Journal
Demographic, Motivational, and Institutional Factors Impacting Academic Success in Higher Education
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Craft as Pedagogy in Architectural Production: Labour, Technology and Non-Formal Learning

by
Milinda Pathiraja
1,2
1
FAR Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology—EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
2
Department of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(3), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030211
Submission received: 25 January 2026 / Revised: 1 March 2026 / Accepted: 7 March 2026 / Published: 23 March 2026

Abstract

In rapidly urbanising developing economies, construction activity frequently relies on informal and semi-skilled labour. This coincides with limited opportunities for systematic skill development, leading to persistent labour deskilling. While existing research has predominantly addressed these challenges through policy reform, industrialisation, or efficiency-driven technological models, less emphasis has been placed on the role of architectural design in shaping labour–technology relations on-site. This article adopts a constructivist perspective on technology to investigate how architectural design can serve as a socio-technical framework for non-formal labour upskilling within construction practice. Drawing upon qualitative case studies of two architectural projects in Sri Lanka—a suburban residential retrofit and a low-income rural housing prototype—this study analyses how design strategies such as systemisation, construction sequencing, material hybridity, and craft-based component detailing embed tacit learning within production processes. The findings demonstrate that craft, understood as a mode of tacit knowledge and on-the-job learning rather than as a stylistic or nostalgic response, can facilitate skill acquisition across diverse economic and technical contexts. By repositioning architectural design as an active mediator between technology and labour, this article contributes to debates within construction studies, social sciences, and architectural theory and proposes design-led construction strategies as a context-sensitive alternative to purely policy- or efficiency-driven approaches to labour development.
Keywords: architectural design; construction labour; craft and tacit knowledge; technology as a social construct; labour upskilling; non-formal learning; design-based research architectural design; construction labour; craft and tacit knowledge; technology as a social construct; labour upskilling; non-formal learning; design-based research

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pathiraja, M. Craft as Pedagogy in Architectural Production: Labour, Technology and Non-Formal Learning. Soc. Sci. 2026, 15, 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030211

AMA Style

Pathiraja M. Craft as Pedagogy in Architectural Production: Labour, Technology and Non-Formal Learning. Social Sciences. 2026; 15(3):211. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pathiraja, Milinda. 2026. "Craft as Pedagogy in Architectural Production: Labour, Technology and Non-Formal Learning" Social Sciences 15, no. 3: 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030211

APA Style

Pathiraja, M. (2026). Craft as Pedagogy in Architectural Production: Labour, Technology and Non-Formal Learning. Social Sciences, 15(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030211

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop