Next Article in Journal
Homage or Biting Lines: Critically Discussing Authorship, Creativity, and Copyright in the 21st Century through Hip-Hop
Next Article in Special Issue
The Machine as Artist as Myth
Previous Article in Journal
Vibing with Blackness: Critical Considerations of Black Panther and Exceptional Black Positionings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Waves to Waveforms: Performing the Thresholds of Sensors and Sense-Making in the Anthropocene
Open AccessArticle

Self-Improving Robotic Brushstroke Replication

Fachbereich Informatik und Informationswissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 September 2018 / Revised: 8 November 2018 / Accepted: 10 November 2018 / Published: 21 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Machine as Artist (for the 21st Century))
Painting robots, like e-David, are currently unable to create precise strokes in their paintings. We present a method to analyse given brushstrokes and extract their trajectory and width using a brush behaviour model and photographs of strokes painted by humans. Within the process, the robot experiments autonomously with different brush trajectories to improve the reproduction results, which are precise within a few millimetres for strokes up to 100 millimetres length. The method can be generalised to other robotic tasks with imprecise tools and visible results, like polishing or milling. View Full-Text
Keywords: robotics; painting; art; generative method; brush robotics; painting; art; generative method; brush
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gülzow, J.M.; Grayver, L.; Deussen, O. Self-Improving Robotic Brushstroke Replication. Arts 2018, 7, 84.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop