Richard Neutra’s Ambiguous Relationship to Luxury
AbstractMany architects of the modern movement who, in theory, refused luxury nonetheless responded to the demand for it. Richard J. Neutra was one of them: Although he mostly rejected luxury in his writings, he gained fame for his skills in constructing luxurious residences. This paper explores how he handled such discrepancies. For this purpose, it relates his understanding of luxury to the German debates on the luxury of the interwar period and analyzes two of his most important expensive residences: the Lovell Health House (1927–1929) and the Kaufmann Desert House (1946–1947). It comes to the conclusion that Neutra took an intermediate position between socialist opponents and idealist proponents of luxury. While he acknowledged the importance of objectivity and scientific thinking and agreed to give priority to the improvement of the living conditions of the masses, he was nevertheless much interested in comfort, aesthetics, details, and individualization. Moreover, it draws attention to the fact that Neutra’s houses also reflected his clients’ relationship to luxury. The Kaufmanns asked for a luxurious background for leisure; the Lovells’ wanted a place for a disciplined life that lacked certain essential traits of luxury. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Brunner, M. Richard Neutra’s Ambiguous Relationship to Luxury. Arts 2018, 7, 75.
Brunner M. Richard Neutra’s Ambiguous Relationship to Luxury. Arts. 2018; 7(4):75.Chicago/Turabian Style
Brunner, Matthias. 2018. "Richard Neutra’s Ambiguous Relationship to Luxury." Arts 7, no. 4: 75.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.