Previous Article in Journal
Navigating Class, Gender, and Urban Mobile Spaces: Dissecting Iranian Car Social Spaces in Cinematic Narratives
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Performance-Theory Revisit of the Conflict Scene at the Ventershoek (2927CA1) Rock Art Site
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Predation, Propitiation and Performance: Ethnographic Analogy in the Study of Rock Paintings from the Lower Parguaza River Basin, Bolivar State, Venezuela

by
Kay Tarble de Scaramelli
1 and
Franz Scaramelli
2,*
1
Departamento de Arqueología y Antropología Histórica, Escuela de Antropología, FaCES, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas 1051, Venezuela
2
Environmental Division, Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City, NV 89712, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Arts 2025, 14(3), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts14030051
Submission received: 21 February 2025 / Revised: 27 April 2025 / Accepted: 29 April 2025 / Published: 5 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Rock Art Studies)

Abstract

:
Rock art sites located in areas inhabited by indigenous peoples offer extraordinary opportunities for interpretation using ethnographic analogy. Nonetheless, we must examine the pertinence of a direct historical approach when dealing with sequences of rock art that may extend back several millennia. Recent decades have witnessed increasingly sophisticated ethnographic analyses that reveal the intimate relations between human and non-human entities and the generative role of myth, music, dance, artifacts, and physical settings in the enactment of creative contexts of lowland South America. This literature has led to a reassessment of the meaning of rock art images, the significance of context, and the place of sites in the landscape. In the pictographs found in several rock shelters on the lower Parguaza River of Venezuela, depictions of a wide variety of human and non-human figures offer insight into the relations between predation, propitiation, food, illness, and the different paths to spiritual knowledge that prevail in the myths and practices of local indigenous populations to this day. In this contribution we explore the promise and limits of ethnographic analogy in the study of sites from this area and offer an analysis of the development of the sites through time, with an eye on both disruption and continuity.

1. Introduction

Rock art sites located in areas inhabited by indigenous peoples in the lowlands of northern South America offer extraordinary opportunities for study using ethnographic analogy. Recent decades have witnessed increasingly sophisticated analyses that reveal the intimate relations between human and non-human entities often depicted in rock art (Descola 1994, 2012; Fausto 2000; Stahl 2014; Turner 2009; Viveiros de Castro 1996, 1998) and the generative role of myth, music, dance, artifacts, and physical settings in the enactment of creative contexts (Guss 1989; Mansutti Rodríguez 2006, 2019; Santos-Granero 2004; Severi 2014). This literature has led to a reassessment of the meaning of images, the significance of context, and the place of rock art sites in the landscape. In the Northwest Amazon and neighboring Orinoco, ethnographers and indigenous scholars have led the way in analyzing the role of petroglyphs and other geographical features in the construction and maintenance of the sacred landscape (González Ñáñez 1980, 2020; Hill 2002; Hugh-Jones 2016; Reichel-Dolmatoff 1971; Santos-Granero 1998, 2009; Vidal 2000, 2002; Wright and Hill 1986; Wright et al. 2017). Archaeologists working in the area have benefitted from these ethnographic studies, as well as from their own personal experiences informed by visits and conversations with community members who share their perspectives on the rock art sites and images found in them (Castaño-Uribe 2019; Greer 1995; Hampson et al. 2024; Iriarte et al. 2022; Lozada Mendieta et al. 2024; Riris and Oliver 2019; Riris et al. 2024; Scaramelli 1992; Scaramelli and Tarble de Scaramelli 2018; Tarble de Scaramelli et al. 2021). Although we have found no evidence for current or recent production of rock art in the Middle Orinoco area, some sites have been modified by indigenous communities through the reengraving of petroglyphs and the painting of new messages.1 These activities underscore the importance that rock art continues to play in the cultural practices of the local communities and further support the utilization of ethnographic analogy in the attempt to comprehend indigenous ontologies and their expression in rock art.
At the same time, other sources of evidence can complement the ethnographic gaze. Archaeology offers chronological depth in a region known to have been occupied for millennia, stretching back to the late Pleistocene and early Holocene (Aceituno et al. 2024; Barse 1990, 2009; Tarble de Scaramelli and Scaramelli 2017). In the Middle Orinoco, evidence for multiple, culturally distinct occupations has been observed in the excavated sequences of numerous sites (Barse 2009; Cruxent and Rouse 1958–1959; Lozada Mendieta et al. 2016; Roosevelt 1980; Vargas 1981; Zucchi 2002; Zucchi et al. 1984), leading to different proposals for population dispersal through time (Antczak et al. 2017; Hornborg and Hill 2011b; Lathrap 1970; Oliver 1989; Rouse 1985; Tarble 1985; Zucchi 2002). At the time of European contact, a wide variety of ethnic groups with different modes of production (farmers, fishermen, hunter/gatherers) occupied the area. Many of these have disappeared or were absorbed by other ethnic groups following the impact of colonization (Mansutti Rodríguez and Bonneuill 1994–1996; Morey and Morey 1975). Linguistic research points to both migration and the creation and maintenance of long-distance ritual and trade networks involving different language-bearing groups that resulted in a dense mosaic of language families in the Orinoco region including Arawakan, Salivan, Cariban, Guajiboan, and other less easily classified languages, such as Pumé (Yaruro), and the now extinct Otomaco and Guamo (Durbin 1985; Heckenberger 2002; Hornborg and Eriksen 2011; Hornborg and Hill 2011a). The rock art of the area is also varied in both technique and context (Cruxent 1946; De Valencia and Sujo-Volsky 1987; Greer 2001; Tarble de Scaramelli and Scaramelli 2010), suggesting the presence of several local traditions of both petroglyphs and rock paintings. In one of the most extensive surveys of rock painting in the Middle Orinoco, Greer (1995) has defined a chronology that extends from pre-ceramic to post-contact times.
Considering this complex occupational history, the analysis of the rock art in different contexts offers the opportunity to discern changes through time, as well as long-term continuities that may affect the relevance of ethnographic analogy (Pearce 2012). Notable shifts in technique, content, and placement of rock art point to the introduction of new practices associated with distinctive horizons of cultural change (Skinner and Challis 2022, p. 9). Continuity is inferred in the reutilization of previously painted panels and the replication of motifs or in the superposition or intentional superimposition of new figures on older ones (Gunn et al. 2022; Motta et al. 2020). Additional information on the utilization of the sites is obtained through the documentation of cultural materials present, such as cupules, polishing grooves, burials, and surface artifacts. When available, stratigraphic excavations in or near sites with rock art reveal further information on the use and chronology of the site.
The analysis of spatial dimensions at different resolutions also contributes to the understanding of change and continuity through time. By situating rock art sites in their context, both geological and as related to other geographic and cultural features, inferences can be made as to the factors involved in the choice of sites and their possible temporal variation in the construction of the landscape. The appearance of new contexts may indicate changes in the function of sites, whereas the maintenance and reutilization of old sites inform the continuity of activity linking different spaces. At a more intimate spatial scale, the size, capacity, orientation, and location of sites are important indicators of preferences through time, as the criteria for rock art site creation may vary with the activities associated with their use. Whitley (2023) has described different types of sites associated with various types of shamanic practice in the far western United States during the same period, related to the social group and the type of ritual being performed.2
In the following sections, we explore the promise and limits of ethnographic analogy in the study of sites from the Parguaza area of the Middle Orinoco and offer an interpretation of the development of the sites through time, with an eye on both disruption and continuity. We will focus on the rock paintings found in the large rock shelters unique to the area, where long-term cultural practice is manifest in the use of these sites for ceremonial and funerary activities and in the multiple styles of paintings therein. We will demonstrate significant shifts in the content of the rock art at different moments in the creation of the complex murals visible today. We propose that following a prolonged but sporadic pre-ceramic presence at the sites, a major change occurs with the introduction of gendered, propitiatory cults, possibly related to the expansion of Maipuran Arawakan expansion throughout the Orinoco Basin. We will focus on the ethnographic evidence that supports this proposal. A later significant shift may reflect a Cariban influx into the area, bringing with it a notable change in the content and technique of the rock paintings. At the same time, we maintain that rock art related to predation, propitiation, and performance is a fundamental aspect of the Northwest Amazonian ethos manifest in the longue-durée (Hill and Santos-Granero 2002), even while recognizing the impact of colonization, demographic loss, and other factors that have resulted in localized responses and innovations (Hill 2002; Hill and Wright 1988; Vidal 2002; Wright and Hill 1986).

2. Rock Art in the Parguaza River Basin

2.1. The Parguaza Basin

The Parguaza River Basin comprises one of the most spectacular settings of the western portion of the Guayana Shield (Figure 1). It is a land of savannah and forests, countless rivers, waterfalls and rapids, deep canyons, and steep hills. The region is dominated by dome-shaped granite hills of Mesoproterozoic origin, technically called inselbergs (Bonilla-Pérez and Frantz 2013; Urbani and Szczerban 1975). These huge outcrops, referred to in the literature as part of the Parguaza Granites, belong to a large batholith protruding through the Amazon Tertiary plains in the form of isolated inselbergs, the largest anorogenic granites worldwide (Figure 2). They are characterized by vertical, or near vertical, walls that present fractures, boulder concentrations, and crevices that, in some cases, have been eroded through the action of wind and rain to form large rock shelters, both at the base of the hills and on shelves eroded out of the face of the gradients. Although a blackish, organic patina covers the surface of the granite, unexposed surfaces, fractures, and cracks reveal the internal colors, ranging from yellowish oranges and pinks to light grey, and it is on these surfaces that rock art is found.
The Parguaza River carries fresh, clear waters from the upper Guayana highlands toward the sediment-laden waters of the Orinoco. The mountains, hills, and plains offer diverse niches characterized by dense forest vegetation, gallery forests, savanna grass, and scrub woodlands. High canopy forests are ubiquitous to the eastern highlands and to the evergreen galleries located along the main streams, creeks and rivers, as well as at the base of the granite boulders and mountains. Resources vary widely between the forested uplands and the savannas. Aquatic and terrestrial fauna are abundant along the rivers and gallery forests. These areas offer a wide variety of resources, including fruits, nuts, woods, resins, honey, palm leaves, and, of course, fish and game. In the savanna, resources are more limited in number and variety but still provide several species of game. In addition, the savanna provides open spaces for human habitation, which today tend to be widely dispersed. The central valley is drained by the Parguaza River and by numerous smaller intermittent streams, all of them plentiful in vegetal and faunal resources. The yearly weather cycle can be roughly divided into a rainy (May–December) and a dryer season (January–April), and the landscape changes noticeably with this cycle, as does its utilization for hunting, fishing, and horticultural practices.
Currently, in addition to the Criollo (Venezuelan nationals) population, the Parguaza Basin is home to disperse Huotthüha or Piaroa (Salivan) communities, but according to local history, the Mapoyo (Cariban) occupied the lower reaches of the river up to the early decades of the 20th century (Perera 1992). Mining activities and deforestation pose increasing threats to the area today (Fundaredes 2023).

2.2. Rock Art Sites in the Parguaza

Rock art in the form of petroglyphs is found in nearly every Venezuelan state where suitable stone support is available (Sujo-Volsky 1975; De Valencia and Sujo-Volsky 1987); nonetheless, the southern states of Bolívar and Amazonas are the home to most of the sites with rock paintings in Venezuela. Dozens of rock art sites have been found in the area, some of which provided shelter for human groups, dating to the initial peopling of the region over 10,000 years ago (Tarble de Scaramelli and Scaramelli 2017). In previous work, sites have been classified based on location, relation to habitation sites, accessibility, visibility of the painted motifs, superposition of styles, and associated features, such as burials, grinding surfaces, and the presence of archaeological remains, including ceramic, lithic, and more recently manufactured goods (Greer 1995; Perera 1983, 1992; Perera and Moreno 1984; Scaramelli 1992; Scaramelli and Tarble 1996; Tarble and Scaramelli 1999; Tarble de Scaramelli and Scaramelli 2010, 2017). Two types of sites are present in the Parguaza area. (1) Large rock shelters are made up of horizontal apertures in the sides of local granitic hills, where ceilings serve to protect open spaces extending between 35 and 150 m along the drip line. Grinding facets and cupules are also common on the bedrock of the shelters (Figure 3). The back walls and ceilings exhibit panels of rock paintings in different styles (Figure 4). Many of these sites were also used for funerary activities in the past and are still the repository for burial bundles and wooden coffins today (Brites 1994; Galarraga et al. 2003). Recent utilization of the sites can also be inferred from the remains of cans, bottles, and ceramic wares dated to the late 19th and early 20th centuries. (2) Small caves are found with limited numbers of paintings on the ceilings. These smaller sites often serve as cemeteries for the Huotthüha who currently inhabit the region.
Based on his research in the southwestern area of Venezuela, Greer defined seven styles/periods based on features, including the technique of application, care of application, color shade and thickness of the paint, line width, figure size, and content (Greer 1995). He used superposition to support his relative chronology for the paintings and integrated archaeological data to provide a provisional scheme for the time periods and geographical branches. The Parguaza region pertains to the northernmost Cedeño branch (Greer 2001, pp. 691–92). The proposed sequence of periods ranges from early pre-ceramic settlement through various ceramic occupations and finalizes in the early colonial period (Greer 2001, p. 689).
Our excavations in the Gavilán 2 (BO-126) rock shelter on the Lower Parguaza exposed a pre-ceramic occupation characterized by a simple, unifacial flaked, crystalline quartz industry associated with well-preserved botanical and faunal remains and a large panel of rock art. AMS 14C dates obtained on charred materials ranging between 10,580 to 10,250 cal. BP (Beta-252625) and 3830 to 3600 cal. BP (Beta-252621) support the presence of an early to middle archaic occupation with a wide spectrum economy that included hunting, fishing, and plant collection like those found in other Venezuelan and Colombian sites (Aceituno Bocanegra 2010; Barse 1990). Fragments of red ochre with striations found in the excavations at levels dated to 3830–3600 BP to 7730–7600 cal. BP may have been used to prepare the pigments for some of the rock paintings found at the site, but no association can be made directly to the paintings. Surface collections revealed ceramic sherds related to Saladoid, Barrancoid, Cedeñoid, Arauquinoid, Valloid, and Nericagua materials, spanning the entire ceramic sequence for the region. Unfortunately, despite decades of investigations, the archaeological chronology for the ceramic sequence of the Middle Orinoco is still disputed, with proposals that range between 6000 BP to 2000 BP for the introduction of the earliest ceramic occupations (see discussions in Antczak et al. 2017; Gassón 2002; Greer 1995). Correlations between ceramic style and rock art images have been suggested, but no direct dating is available for the rock art (Greer 1995; Lozada Mendieta et al. 2022; Páez 2021; Riris et al. 2024; Rivas 1993; Tarble 1991; Tarble and Scaramelli 1995).
Several features serve to distinguish the rock art sites of the Parguaza Basin from other sites in Venezuela. Sites chosen for rock art in early periods tend to be reutilized through time, often for millennia. This is particularly true for the large rock shelters that offer evidence for long-term use. Unique to the area is the variety of painted styles, including monochrome, bi-chrome, and polychrome motifs, often superimposed in complex panels (Greer 1995; Scaramelli 1992). Painted areas within sites appear to determine the areas of repainting, with multiple styles superimposed in such a way as to create increasingly complex murals (Figure 5). This practice appears to have been conceived as an enhancement or reaffirmation of the imagery rather than an iconoclastic practice. Also notable is the prominence of zoomorphic motifs, including realistic and stylized renditions of humans, fish, deer, rodents, birds, lizards, turtles, snakes, and other recognizable elements, some of which show interaction in the form of scenes (Figure 6). Finally, although motifs and styles can be seen to change through time, there is also a tendency to duplicate, imitate, and restate earlier images. Therefore, despite disruption, there is also continuity in the selection of content. This would seem to indicate a shared worldview of great time depth. These characteristics confirm the idea that once chosen as a site to be painted, the same sites were prone to visitation and symbolic revalidation through time, thus serving as anchors to the landscape and the maintenance of the cultural code determining use and meaning (Scaramelli and Tarble de Scaramelli 2018).

3. Methods: Defining the Stylistic Sequence of Rock Paintings in the Parguaza Region

The sequence outlined in Table 1 is based on data retrieved from five rock shelters located in the Lower Parguaza Basin (BO26-B, BO-27-B, BO-29, BO-35, BO-126)3 (Figure 7). This is part of an ongoing analysis of the motifs associated with different styles at each site. In the three sites located in indigenous territory, we obtained permission and were accompanied to the rock shelters by several members of the local communities. At the other sites, we also obtained permission from the local Criollo community who facilitated guides to the sites. Each site was mapped using a compass and tape measure, and associated cultural remains and grinding surfaces were logged; in some cases, diagnostic ceramic sherds and lithic artifacts were collected for analysis. During fieldwork, drawings and some tracings of the superpositions were made to enable later analysis of the photos. As noted above, limited excavations were carried out at BO-126, a site that is not currently located on indigenous land. Burials and funerary deposits were left undisturbed. The sites were photographed on successive short visits since 1992, using film and digital cameras. The late Miguel Ángel Perera donated photos from one of the sites (BO-29), taken during his visit in 1987. We have used the D-Stretch application developed by Jon Harman (2009) and Adobe Photoshop enhancement to analyze the photos.
A database in Excel is currently under construction to record details of the motifs for each site. Although the photographic coverage is incomplete, we have endeavored to follow the layout of the sites, creating an ordered sequence from one end of the site to the other. Figures were divided into two broad categories: anthropomorphic/zoomorphic, identified by numerals, and abstract/geometric/artifactual, labeled alphabetically. Further details of the type of paint, color, possible identification, and tentative period placement are also noted in the database.4
Both in the field and, later, in the study of photographs, special attention was given to the occurrence of superpositioning. BO-35 was the key site to determine the sequence throughout the Parguaza, as it offered the clearest evidence for the superpositioning of the largest number of styles/periods in one site. We compared our data with those supplied in Greer’s analysis (1995). Based on the sequence developed for this site, it was possible to observe similar sequences of superpositioning at the other sites, and modify and add to Greer’s observations, although none of the other sites offered as complete a sequence as that found at BO-35. The sites vary considerably in the relative frequency of the different styles/periods and in the presence or absence of certain types of motifs. For example, BO-35 contains the greatest concentration of style/period 3 fish and other aquatic zoomorphs and the only appearance of polychrome style/period 5 figures. BO-29 is distinguished by a higher number of masked figures and style/period 4 zoomorphs and interactive scenes. BO-26-B, the smallest cave in the sample, has a distinctive style/period 3 painting technique, while BO-126 is notable for the predominance of style/period 6 figures.
As seen in Table 1, there are considerable differences in the content and technique of the painted styles. Greer (1995) has argued that it may be useful to contemplate parallel developments for the styles and suggests that a continuous monochrome tradition of styles 1-2-4 may be interrupted by, but parallel to, the intrusion of style 3 and its further development into style 5. The increasing variety in stylistic representation during the later periods (5–6) probably reflects the ethnic diversity mentioned earlier for the area by the time of European colonization. We will discuss these proposals in greater detail in the following paragraphs.
Style/period 2, the earliest clearly identifiable style found at the sites included in this analysis, underlies all other styles in superimposed contexts (Figure 8). Fine-lined purplish paint is used to create predominantly zoomorphic figures such as interior-lined reptiles and large birds with open wings, although some anthropomorphic figures painted with faint, broad strokes are also present. Very few geometric motifs are associated with the style (Figure 9). The rather rare figures pertaining to this style at different sites do not overlap one another on the walls. It is, nonetheless, common to find period 3 paintings superimposed on period 2 motifs. Outside the Parguaza area, Greer (1995) has reported other sites with period 2 motifs to the south, and Lozada Mendieta et al. (2024) report interior-lined fish for sites on the western side of the Orinoco that they associate with period 2. We have also documented interior-lined fish motifs at sites near Puerto Ayacucho that support a distribution of the style along the Middle Orinoco. Greer has suggested that this style may be associated with pre-ceramic occupations in the area and shows continuity from his period 1.
Style/period 3 appears dramatically in the study area. Large, ghost-like anthropomorphs with singular headpieces, smaller, bow-legged figures, and square-bodied figures that seem to be wearing woven costumes are characteristic of the style, along with multitudes of carefully detailed fish, amphibians, turtles, and other terrestrial and aquatic species. Life-sized deer portrayed in active postures are present at several of the sites, portrayed in such a similar manner that it would be possible to infer that they were painted by the same person. At one of the sites (BO-27-B), three deer appear to be running as if being chased (Figure 10).
Other less common figures include iguana, feline, bottlenose dolphin, armadillo, tapir, capybara, and snake (Figure 8 and Figure 11). Phytomorphs are very rare. Fish are more common at the sites closer to the Orinoco (BO-35), whereas anthropomorphs and mammals are more frequent inland (BO-26-B, BO-27-B, and BO-29). The use of white or yellow figures outlined with red contrasts sharply with the underlying monochrome red figures, suggesting an intrusive style that is almost exclusively limited in geographic extent to the sites in the Parguaza River Basin. Period 3 figures are painted over period 2 figures in several sites analyzed for this paper, even when ample empty space was available for painting (Figure 8). This suggests an intentional superpositioning and continued use of previously painted sites. Greer (1995) has suggested that this style may be linked to the appearance of the Saladoid occupation in the Middle Orinoco due to the emphasis on bichrome white-on-red painting. Alternatively, it may be a localized expression, contemporaneous with the widespread expansion of style/period 4, which we will discuss in the next paragraph. Notably, geometric/abstract figures are infrequent in this style, indicating that human and non-human encounters continue to dominate the subject matter of the rock art.
Style/period 4 literally dances onto the scene with a proliferation of monochrome red, masked figures with decorated squarish or triangular bodies, with and without headdresses and other paraphernalia, such as rattles or leg bands (Greer and Greer 2006) (Figure 12).
Many different styles of stick figures representing humans in profile and frontal views are present. Some of these show male genitals, but most are not easily identified. Some figures are lined up as if dancing; others have raised arms in an attitude of supplication. Other anthropomorphic figures appear to be falling (Figure 13).
Numerous zoomorphic figures are outlined, solid, or with spotted/reticular-filled interiors, and appear both individually and lined up horizontally on a line. Deer, fish, birds, reptiles, frogs, felines, canines, and others are portrayed in pairs, rows, and individually (Figure 14). Several geometric figures appear in this style period: outlined crosses (single, double, and multiple), concentric circles (some segmented and others rayed), segmented boxes, and lines of dots and dashes (Figure 15).
Although most figures show little interaction, several “scenes” are portrayed in this period. Especially notable are scenes in BO-29 portraying humans hunting deer or other quadrupeds, using what appear to be spear throwers (atlatls) or throwing sticks (Figure 16a,c,h). No bows and arrows, blowguns, or firearms are pictured. Human figures with long poles or ropes are depicted with lines of quadrupeds, often shown on horizontal lines, as if herding or lassoing.5 Other scenes show interactions between birds and fish and possible fish traps associated with schools of fish. At BO-29, the superimposition of some style 4 hunting scenes, zoomorphs, and geometric figures within the body of large style 3 figures points to the intentional framing of these scenes. In other sites, such as BO-35, style 3 zoomorphs are frequently overlaid by style 4 geometrics, such as multiple outlined crosses (Figure 8).
In several of the rock shelters (BO-27, BO-29, BO-35), there are sectors defined by crevices, or openings in the base of the walls, from which multitudes of figures appear to emerge, often superimposed on one another, blurring the individual motifs (Figure 17).
Style 4 is much more widespread than any of the earlier styles, with motifs reminiscent of figures found as far west as Chiribiquete and La Lindosa in Colombia (Castaño-Uribe 2019; Muñoz Castiblanco 2020)6 and to the east, at sites in the vicinity of Caicara del Orinoco (Tarble de Scaramelli and Scaramelli 2010, 2021) and Puerto Ordaz (Sanoja and Vargas 1970). To the north, rock paintings found in rock shelters in Aruba show stylistic similarity to styles 3 and 4, with the presence of outlined crosses, concentric circles, circle and bar, as well as zoomorphic and anthropomorphic motifs (Kelly 2009, p. 184). Kelly attributes the similarity to influence from the Middle Orinoco. There is considerable diversity in style 4, both intersite and intrasite, that Greer suggests may indicate “somewhat autonomous communities” within a larger region where interaction seems to have been frequent (Greer 1995, p. 98).
Style/period 5 is marked by a proliferation of abstract monochrome and polychrome designs, with an emphasis on figures such as connected circles, dots and lines, concentric arcs, and chains of concentric circles with “wings”. Once again, many style 5 figures are placed on top of earlier paintings, creating dense concentrations in complex panels (Figure 18). This is the only style with polychrome figures executed in red, black, and white.
Style/period 6 marks a pronounced shift in technique, color combinations, type of paint, and, to an extent, content of the rock art. While earlier styles were generally well-executed, with an eye to detail and careful execution, style 6 motifs are somewhat sloppy and poorly executed. The clay-based paint is often runny or thick, with a dull, chalky appearance, found in white, pink, yellow, and dull reds. Caraña (a type of dark resin) is also present (Greer 1995). Quadrupeds, anthropomorphs, and “maracas” are found, but zig-zag lines, meanders, hatching, parallel lines, etc., are more frequent. The best representation of this style is found in BO-126 (Tarble de Scaramelli and Scaramelli 2017), where the main panel is dominated by style 6 paintings. Paired representations are characteristic of the style, and these are often painted in 2 different colors, such as dark yellow and white (Figure 19).

4. Placing the Rock Art in a Cultural Context

In the presence of rock art, one is often overwhelmed by sensations that go far beyond “seeing”. The access to many sites in the Parguaza basin involves a hot climb up a steep, granitic surface or a hike through dense, tangled vegetation. The immediate sensation on arrival is the cool relief of the shelter and then the musky smell of decaying plant matter, termite residue, and, at times, burial remains. Wasps and bees may be excited by a foreign presence, setting off a menacing buzz. As one’s eyes adjust to the muted light, figures start to come into focus, and on what was once a wall of undefined shapes and colors, certain images begin to emerge, sometimes singly, sometimes in a mass of superimposed figures. It is easy to comprehend that these are special places, filled with elusive meanings and vestiges of past performances. On several occasions, our guides and companions felt inspired to narrate ancient stories as we set about our recording. They did not claim to have made the paintings; that was the work of deities who “thought” them into place or “cried” them into being in ancient times. Currently, the sites are considered to hold special significance and demand respect. Our attempts to understand these sites in the context of the peoples who created them and used them must take into consideration the range of actions and senses that were involved in these practices. Although we are limited in our means to access the meanings that prevailed in different times and under varying circumstances, we can draw on ethnographic and historical sources to approach the challenge these sites present.
Several aspects of the rock art described above suggest that the sites were used for ceremonial purposes in different ways through time. A pervading theme throughout is the predominance of anthropomorphic and zoomorphic figures, although the emphasis on these diminishes in the latter part of the sequence. The sites are all located some distance from habitation sites, except for BO-126, a site found at ground level, where a lengthy pre-ceramic occupation was found, apparently predating most of the paintings. Each site included in the study shows a prolonged sequence, supporting the idea that the caves with rock paintings continued to be utilized by groups that may or may not have been affiliated culturally with the original painters and their communities. This implies that these sites came to acquire a special status in the landscape in accordance with widespread belief systems that grant agency to rocks, caves, waterfalls, lagoons, and other geographic features (Halbmayer 2012; Overing and Kaplan 1988; Santos-Granero 2009; Wright et al. 2017). It could be argued, then, that the painted walls of the caves became their “social skin”, much as body painting “dressed” the person (Turner 1995).7
The use of the caves for funerary rites appears to have increased as time passed, although earlier burials may have been removed or decayed through time. Both Huotthüha and the Mapoyo are known to use caves as repositories for burials at the present, although both deny painting the sites, nor choosing them because of the presence of paintings.8 The association of burials with rock shelters points to the role of caves as conduits between the underworld and the world of daily activity. In light of these features, we propose that the painted shelters were the setting for diverse ritual activities related to worldviews that incorporated shamanic intervention in the propitiation of well-being, the negotiation of predation, and the protection against harm.

4.1. Ethnographic Analogy and the Search for Meaning

Numerous attempts to find meaning in the rock art of the area have referred to perspectivist and animist belief systems found throughout the Northwest Amazon and the need to go beyond the cultural/natural dichotomy (Castaño-Uribe and Hammen 1998; Castaño-Uribe 2019; González Ñáñez 1980; Iriarte et al. 2022; Riris et al. 2024; Wright et al. 2017). In their analysis of the rock art found in la Serranía La Lindosa, in Colombia, Hampson et al. include a detailed discussion of the ethnographic references to the fluidity between the natural and supernatural, the “complex and many-layered social and ideological relationships between humans and animals beyond utilitarian exploitation” (Hampson et al. 2024, p. 11), and the role of shamans in the negotiation with the Master of Animals to assure the release of game prior to predatory activity. In discussing South American lowland indigenous cosmologies, Halbmayer stresses that they “do not create encompassing totalities or an integrated universe, but […] a multiverse of co-existing and multiply connected worlds relying on a specific form of non-totalizing partial encompassment” (Halbmayer 2012, p. 120). The multiverse may include persons, spirits, houses, tools, musical instruments, animals, plants, and villages (of humans or non-humans). Brabec de Mori and Seeger (2013, p. 277) further this discussion, maintaining that the parts are related to each other and, “through the distribution of agency in various aspects of the multiverse, these relations as well as the entities themselves are never stable but have to be constantly negotiated, maintained or transformed” (Brabec de Mori and Seeger 2013, p. 277). Recent work has built on the ontological turn to explore different approaches to the comprehension of the relation between humans and non-humans. Hill (1993, 2013) criticizes the perspectivist approach for overly focusing on the visual elements, arguing that recent ethnomusicological analysis is revealing the fundamental role of the sonic to communicate and interrelate between spirits and humans (see also Halbmayer 2012; Severi 2014). Others seek to overcome the overemphasis on predation and aggression, while neglecting aspects of conviviality and equilibrium (Overing and Passes 2000; Wright 2011). In line with this position, Hill (2002) seeks in his work to show how collective ritual performance serves to “musicalize the other” to maintain a balance between life-giving and life-taking forces (Hill 2002).9
As we look for ways to comprehend the depictions of humans and non-humans in rock art, it becomes clear that they cannot be taken simply at face value, nor can we interpret zoomorphic and phytomorphic elements as mere illustrations of the natural habitat or potential foodstuffs.10 Likewise, geometric or abstract patterns, such as those found in rock art, houses, baskets, textiles, gourds, pottery, body paint and stamps, tattoos, etc., are best seen as parts of a wider system of memory that includes music, speech, chants, and songs (Guss 1989; Hugh-Jones 2016; Reichel-Dolmatoff 1987; Santos-Granero 1998; Severi 2014). By this, we do not mean that rock art figures can be interpreted as illustrations of myths, but rather that myths, chants, and iconographies can be understood as “‘variations’ of the same ‘conceptual imagination’” (Severi 2014, pp. 45–46). For example, among the Yekwana, a Carib-speaking group of the Upper Orinoco, baskets decorated with designs “incorporate a complex system of symbols that act as an index and key to the rest of the culture” (Severi 2014, pp. 48–49). The baskets are actual embodiments of mythical beings, have agency, and their designs are linked to the chants that accompany their weaving (Guss 1989, p. 36 in Severi 2014, p. 49). We argue that a similar relation is likely to underly the designs found in rock art, where the design itself embodies multiple layers of meaning, and the context of the graphisms and sites can provide important clues regarding different types of ritual performance and their variation through time.

4.2. Continuity and Disruption in the Parguaza Rock Art Sequence

As discussed above, there is clear evidence for some continuity in the conception of rock art that permeates the entire sequence of the Parguaza region. At the same time, certain shifts in emphasis suggest that there were major disjunctions that may have been associated with the influx of populations bringing with them innovations in language, productive strategies, and cosmology that are manifest in the rock art of the area. These can be summarized as follows:
  • Pre-ceramic occupations. These may have lasted several millennia, characterized by sporadic painting at rock shelters in the Parguaza area and beyond, suggesting a widespread sharing of symbolic representation. Zoomorphic elements include the detailed rendering of reptiles, large, long-legged birds with outspread wings, interior-lined fish, and depictions of small quadrupeds. A few representations of highly stylized anthropomorphs are also present. No interaction is seen between the figures, and no superpositioning is noted. It is difficult to assess the types of activity associated with these manifestations, but apparently, there was no emphasis on large, organized ritual celebrations, just as you would expect from small-scale populations.
  • Early ceramic occupations. The sudden advent of new painting technology, content, and frequency associated with style/periods 3 and 4 signals a rupture with previous traditions. The emphasis on carefully executed, costumed anthropomorphs and scenes of interacting figures portraying an array of activities, including flute-playing, dancing, hunting, fishing, and trapping, signals the appearance in the region of more sedentary societies, with a novel cosmovision that may have coincided with the arrival of ceramic-bearing Arawakan peoples and the hierarchical, ritual complex we know today as the Yuruparí or Kuwai, widely distributed throughout the Northwest Amazon and beyond. This shift has its counterpart in many of the petroglyphs found along the Orinoco and tributaries, with similar motifs, but with far greater visibility that suggests a different function for the sites. We will discuss this proposal further below.
  • Late ceramic occupations. The final shift in the rock art of the Parguaza entails a notable change in the conception and execution of the paintings, where the planning and carrying out of carefully rendered anthropomorphic and zoomorphic figures and scenes are replaced by an increasing emphasis on hastily painted geometric and abstract designs, and the appearance of paired figures painted in contrasting colors. Ghost figures, hunting/trapping scenes, and massive displays of zoomorphs are no longer present. The emphasis on duality indicates a shift in cosmology that may coincide with the influx of Cariban-speaking communities into the area.11 It may also be associated with the appearance of ceramics of the Valloid tradition, in which little attention is paid to decorative technique, in contrast to earlier Saladoid and Arauquinoid traditions. It is not clear whether the more frequent use of the sites as burial repositories dates to this shift or whether it is a more recent reutilization of the caves, both with and without rock art, by present-day indigenous communities, such as the Huotthüha and Mapoyo.

5. The Yuruparí Ritual Complex and Its Expression in the Rock Art of the Parguaza

5.1. The Yuruparí Ritual Complex

The Yuruparí ritual complex is found among multiple ethnic groups of the Río Negro, Vaupés, and Middle Orinoco (Hugh-Jones 2016; Mansutti Rodríguez 2006; Wright 2011). The Yuruparí, and others like it, such as the Warime ceremony found among the Huotthüha and the Kuwai, found among the Arawak-speaking groups, can be understood as a ceremonial complex involving aerophone instruments and, in many cases, masks, that act as agents for the reproduction of human and non-human beings.12 The chants, songs, myths, puberty rites, and festivals associated with the complex comprise a system of beliefs and practical codes, imparted to humans by the primordial being, master of the visible and invisible, and taught to children at their initiation rites (Vidal 2000, p. 641). Intertribal Yuruparí ceremonies often last for extended times and usually involve the exchange of food and drink between kin and affines, dances, singing, and initiation rites. More intimate intratribal rituals tend to be focused on healing. In some cases, the Yuruparí ceremonies also involve ritual whippings or other corporal penances. Although there are important differences between the rituals celebrated between different groups, often responding to particular demographic, social, and political circumstances, there are basic elements that they share: the aerophones are played exclusively by men and utilized in initiation rites; in mythic times the aerophones were stolen by the women and then stolen back by the men; spaces are created for the cult, segregated by gender, such as a men’s house and related secret societies; among the Arawak and Tukano, the cult has a hierarchical function, with particular instruments and songs belonging to patrisibs who form part of exogamous societies (González Ñáñez 1986; Hill 1993, 2013; Hugh-Jones 2016; Santos-Granero 2004; Vidal 2000, 2002; Wright 2011; Hill and Wright 1988). Women and uninitiated children are prohibited from seeing the aerophones and bearers of the masks but actively participate in the ceremonies from within special buildings or from the forest beyond the village.
The flutes and trumpets are said to be the body of the first ancestral being from which all peoples descended. Based on a three-part mythical cycle, oral tradition deals with the primordial origins, which for the Arawak is found in Hípana, the “universal navel” that connects Earth with the sky (Wright et al. 2017). This is an inchoate, small “universe” filled with cannibalistic beings feeding on one another. It was a time when there were no distinctions between dead and living, male and female, and human and nonhuman. A second cycle revolves around the birth of Kuwai/Yuruparí, “whose body consists of all worldly elements and whose humming and singing…causes the world to expand and brings into being all living species and natural elements” (Hill and Wright 1988, p. 86). It is during this cycle that Kuwai taught the first ancestors agriculture and the sacred rituals of initiation (Vidal 2000, p. 642). Kuwai is killed in a fire, and the world shrinks again, but out of his ashes grow the plant materials used to make the aerophones played in initiation rituals and other sacred ceremonies. The women steal the sacred instruments and lead a chase to the four ends of the earth, expanding the world once again, making the world a fertile place, and leaving evidence of their stopping places in the petroglyphs, rock formations, and other geographic features on the landscape (Hugh-Jones 2016, p. 159, Vidal 2000; Wright et al. 2017, p. 189)13. Following the repossession of the sacred instruments by the men, the third cycle of the narrative refers to the creation of humans and their division into named ethnic units linked by marriage and exchange, as well as many accounts of migrations and warfare (Hugh-Jones 2016, p. 159). The third cycle also narrates the relationship between humans and powerful spirits and how this relates to concepts of illness, death, cures, and prevention in the hands of shamans, some of whom can cross boundaries between the living and dead through the ritual language of chants and the musical language of Kuwai (Hill and Wright 1988, p. 88). Hill explains the central role of wind instruments in the ritual and ceremonial practices of Amazonian communities, asserting that
… it is necessary to explore the importance of indigenous understandings of breath and breathing as expressions of life-force and the associated meanings of wind instruments as cultural tools for channelling this life-force into activities designed to collectivise shamanic abilities to return to life from death and to ensure the continued fertility of animal nature as well as the regeneration of human social worlds. Collective performances of wind instruments are closely related to shamanic powers of killing, dying and returning to life, which invoke natural processes that are simultaneously concerned with the reproductive behaviours of ‘animal’ species—fish, birds, game animals and various spirits—and images of predatory violence (Hill 2013, p. 324)
Throughout the Northwest Amazon, an essential aspect of the relationship between humans, non-humans, and the role of shamans in the propitiation of well-being has to do with the notions of disease, hunting, the ingestion of food, and chanting or blowing. Among the Huotthüha, for example, there is a category of terrestrial spirits and gods that send disease to the animals. These are known as the guardians or “grandparents” of the disease. The most important of these are the grandfather/owner of the animals of the land and air and the grandfather/owner of the water and aquatic animals (Mansutti Rodríguez 2006, p. 25). When a hunter kills an animal, these gods send the spirit of the dead animal into the body of the hunter to cause him to become ill. By means of singing and blowing, the shaman sends other gods to combat the illness in the body of the patient (Overing and Kaplan 1988, p. 396). Meat can only be consumed following strict protocols in which the shaman, through his singing and blowing, transforms the meat into vegetal food, free of the danger of contamination and resulting illness (Overing and Kaplan 1988, p. 382). Humans are conceived as related to animals through affinal kinship, a relationship that is cannibalistic by nature. When a person eats an animal, it will cannibalize him in turn, causing illness. Both animals and affinal kin are considered to be transmitters of disease and, therefore, potential cannibals (Overing and Kaplan 1988, p. 402). In the mythology of the Arawakan Baniwa, the figure of Kuwai, “who is all predatory animal spirits in one… gave rise to all predatory spirits of nature who give sickness to humans, called Iupinai”. (Wright 2011, p. 14) It is seen, then, that aerophones play an ambivalent role in the ritual context, both as the source of sickness, in the form of predatory animal spirits, and as the cure for the illness through their music. The essence of the Yuruparí ritual complex and its associated shamanic interventions is its ability to domesticate the threat of predation and transform it into harmonious conviviality (Wright 2011; Hill 2013). Male initiation rites serve to instruct the initiates in the sacred knowledge of the chants and instruments and to prepare them as successful hunters and members of society. Among the Huotthüha, for example, knowledge is visualized metaphorically as the internal “pathway of beads” that a person continues to expand throughout his lifetime by participating in further ceremonies. The designs used in their face paintings and as designs on their baskets are an external expression of the beads they have accumulated in their bodies. The beads contain the words of the sacred songs, and the designs are conceived as their pathways (Overing and Kaplan 1988, p. 339).
A final aspect of the Yuruparí Complex that is relevant to our discussion of rock art is the interplay between vertical and horizontal axes of ritual chants. Chants can be structured in a sequence of named sacred sites, many of which are located along rivers, following a lineal course (Hugh-Jones 2016, pp. 159–61). Hill refers to this aspect of chants as the “chasing after names”. The vertical axis of a chant involves the “heaping up of names” (Hill 1993, 1996, 2011), or lists of names, species, ritual objects, etc., that convey the multiple meanings imbued in the songs and dances that evoke episodes of the myth corresponding to that specific site. The vertical and horizontal axes, at the same time, correspond to two aspects of the cosmos that, according to Wright (1998), are “antithetical yet complementary and correspond in reality to two important principles of social organization: hierarchy, which defines social relations among sibs of the same phratries; and egalitarianism, which defines relations among peoples of different phratries or language groups with whom marital exchanges may be made”. Both axes are essential to an understanding of the role of the ritual complex in social reproduction.14

5.2. Rock Art Associations with the Yuruparí Complex

When analyzing the paintings associated with styles/periods 3 and 4 in the Parguaza sequence, several aspects lead us to propose a relation to a ritual complex similar to the Yuruparí/Kuwai tradition.
  • These styles coincide with the proliferation of motifs associated with masked figures and musical instruments, including flutes and maracas, and lines of dancers that signal more organized ritual practices compared to those portrayed in earlier periods. (see Figure 12)
  • The variety of designs on the body of the masked figures and the assortment of headdresses may point to a hierarchy of participants, each with specific roles in the ceremonies, such as those illustrated in the ethnographic literature (Goulard and Karadimas 2011; Koch-Grünberg [1925] 2008, 2010; Mansutti Rodríguez 2006, 2019) (Figure 20).
  • The hunting and fishing scenes and the numerous depictions of anthropomorphic, zoomorphic, and theriomorphic figures speak to the preoccupation with the complex relations between humans and non-humans and the capacity for transformation and transmutation in a multiverse populated by visible and invisible agents (Severi 2014) (see Figure 16).
  • An almost exclusive representation of male or non-gendered anthropomorphs points to the exclusivity of the ritual practices carried out at the sites on the Parguaza, possibly associated with male initiations. As we saw in the previous section, the sight of aerophones (and the identity of masked dancers) was prohibited for women and non-initiated members of the community. The depiction of falling figures may refer to the ritual suicides enacted because of the violation of the proscriptions (see Figure 13d).
  • The seeming emergence of multiple figures out of crevices or openings in the rock suggests the ‘calling out’ of beings by the owners of species from their otherworldly spaces. The placement of paintings at several of the Parguaza sites takes advantage of holes, cracks, or other features of the rock to show interaction with the supporting medium. There are frequent references in the ethnographic literature to caves and mountains as the “maloca” or home of spirit beings and gods (Overing and Kaplan 1988, pp. 393–94; Mansutti Rodríguez 2012; Scaramelli 1992, pp. 47–49) (see Figure 17). This is a common feature of rock art associated with shamanism worldwide (see, for example, Rozwadowski 2017; Stoffle et al. 2024).
  • The careful superpositioning of figures within the bodies of existing paintings and the displays of massive numbers of certain species, such as fish, suggests the “piling on of names” or vertical axis of chanting referred to by Hill and Hugh-Jones above. The multiple repetition of figures and the layering of motifs could emulate the chanting of a series of names, spirits, species, etc., in the context of rituals carried out in the rock shelters (Figure 21).
  • Geometric motifs, such as concentric circles or rhombuses, outlined crosses, and other designs like those found on baskets and body paint may be translational depictions of mythical elements, fragments of chants and songs, that accompany the rituals. Although we are limited to the visual aspects of the past ritual practices in the rock art sites, this interpretation of these motifs reminds us that music and chanting played a fundamental role in ceremonies.15
  • Many motifs of the style 4 paintings have a broad distribution throughout the Northwest Amazon and Orinoco, suggesting an interaction area associated with the initial Arawakan expansion that, at the same time, may have had local expressions, such as that found in style 3 of the Parguaza. Common to all these areas are the abundant and diverse zoomorphic, anthropomorphic, and theriomorphic depictions, hunting and fishing scenes, masked figures, groups of dancers and figures in attitudes of supplication, geometric and abstract designs like those used in body paint, basketry, and textiles. Red monochrome figures predominate this style at sites throughout the region (Greer 1995; Iriarte et al. 2022; Hampson et al. 2024; Lozada Mendieta et al. 2024). Vidal (2000, Figures 2 and 3) has reconstructed the sacred routes associated with the Kuwai oral traditions that include a vast area covering the NW Amazon and Guayana (see also Hill 2011, Figure 13.1 and 13.2). This area coincides with the predominantly fluvial route of the northern part of the Arawakan exchange system around AD 900 illustrated by Hornborg and Eriksen (2011, Map 6.1) (Figure 22).
  • The similarity of certain motifs at different sites in the Parguaza region suggests the visitation of sites by some of the same artists. At the same time, each site has specific content that points to a specialized function or local tradition. This recalls the axes of the Yuruparí ritual, in which the horizontal axis entails physical or shamanic visions of visitation to the different sites named in the chants (Hill 2011; Hugh-Jones 2016; Wright et al. 2017; Vidal 2000, p. 644). This is most clearly expressed in the numerous petroglyph sites that are found along the course of the Orinoco (González Ñáñez 2020; Wright et al. 2017). Recent research on giant petroglyphs in the Middle and Upper Orinoco (Riris et al. 2024) shows a stylistic similarity between motifs found in the monumental petroglyph panels and ceramics of the Arauquinoid and Valloid series. Several of the motifs found in the petroglyphs are also found in the style 4 paintings of the Parguaza sequence: masked figures, concentric circles, stylized birds and anthropomorphic figures, mammals, and lizards, suggesting broad contemporaneity. Nonetheless, the emphasis on snakes in the monumental art supports the association of these sites with the myths of Tukano and Arawak-speaking groups who tie their origins to the emergence, travels, and resting places of ancestral serpent-canoes (Riris 2017; Riris et al. 2024, p. 733). This suggests two rock art traditions, one expressed as highly visible petroglyphs in a riverine orientation that commemorate the cosmic origins and horizontal axis of the Yuruparí, and the other, expressed in paintings, associated with more restricted ritual performance in rock shelters of difficult access.

6. Animals, Plants, and the Longue-Durée

In closing, there is one striking aspect of the rock paintings in the Parguaza region that merits further discussion. How can we explain the emphasis on anthropomorphic and zoomorphic figures in contexts that were associated with productive strategies that included the gathering and eventual cultivation of a wide variety of plants? Although it has become increasingly clear that the processes of familiarization, domestication, and cultivation of an immense number of plants and trees took place over millennia in the tropical lands of South America (Fausto and Neves 2018), depictions of flora are rare throughout the rock art sequence (Figure 23). This is particularly noteworthy when we analyze the rock art of styles/periods 3 and 4, which we have argued are associated with the Arawakan expansion throughout northern South America and, eventually, the Caribbean. This diaspora has been correlated with settled agricultural village life (complemented with aquatic resources), social hierarchy, regional social organization (Heckenberger 2002)16, and an “ethos” that, among other things, assigns religion a key role in personal, social, and political life (Santos-Granero 2002, p. 45).
There is, perhaps, a clue to be found in the Yuruparí myth cited above. As we recall, in the second cycle of the myth, Kuwai taught the first ancestors agriculture and the sacred initiation rituals. Following his burning, out of the ashes grew the plant materials used to make the aerophones played in initiation rituals and other sacred ceremonies. The women stole the sacred instruments and led a chase, expanding the world for a second time, and through the music of Kuwai, created the cultural and geographic landscape inhabited by humans and other creatures today (Hill 2011, pp. 261–62). Nonetheless, the men chased them and stole the flutes back, and the current third cycle of the myth commences. The control of Kuwai’s voice and its expression through the different aerophones made from his body parts and other natural species, were kept in the hands of shamans and chant-owners. Imbued with mythic powers, they recreate the ritual landscape and commemorate the place-naming of the ritual cycle during the initiation rituals held for boys and girls. Nonetheless, only in the male initiation rites are the secrets of the sacred aerophones revealed during the boys’ lengthy training in adult male activities.
It is possible that the expansion of rituals such as the Yuruparí, with its origin derived from the struggle for shamanic power between men and women, may reveal a shift in power relations between genders that coincides precisely with the moment when agricultural production, an activity controlled mainly by women, began to play a central role in the productive practices of Orinocan societies. Mansutti Rodríguez comments on this aspect of the Yuruparí/Warime ceremony, where masked figures representing the masters of agricultural products, the master of the waters and all the aquatic animals, and the master of all the animals of the earth and sky are present:
This ceremony consolidates alliances between the shamans and their communities with the masters who control animals and plants exploited by the Piaroa people, facilitates men’s expropriations and limits women’s power to the domestic sphere, and shifts a society with no major hierarchical organizations into a highly hierarchical one as long as the ceremony is occurring (Mansutti Rodríguez 2012, p. 46).
Therefore, although women exercise the day-to-day control of the domestic and agricultural world (which they created in mythical times), they are displaced from the shamanic control of power (through the stealing back of the flutes), from the space of fertility where they have strength (procreation), and from the space whose control could allow them to be autonomous from men (agriculture) (Mansutti Rodríguez 2012, p. 69). It could be argued, then, that the myths serve to justify the male role in the ritual sphere as the promoters of fertility and protectors of the well-being of the community. Ritual practice continues to focus on the shamanic negotiations with the masters of the animals and plants in spaces dominated by men and prohibited to women and the uninitiated. This may help us to comprehend the use of rock shelters for ritual purposes, with the frequent depictions of (mostly male) anthropomorphic and zoomorphic figures characteristic of styles/periods 3 and 4, even in societies increasingly dependent on agriculture and forest management. This ritual affirmation of gendered power relations in situations of subsistence change can be found in rock art contexts outside the study area. As Whitley has argued for the prehistoric Coso Range in the Great Basin, a shift toward intensive female seed gathering was not reflected in the rock art, which, to the contrary, increasingly emphasized males and their activities, especially males’ importance in rainmaking (Whitley 2023, p. 295). “Recognizing that culture in part serves an ideological purpose by masking the real nature of social relations and thereby supports the status quo, it is then apparent that the articulation of art and social relations occurs within a larger cultural system of ideological symbols” (Whitley 1994, p. 367).
As we argued earlier, the later styles/periods of rock paintings (5 and 6), with their greater emphasis on geometric/abstract motifs, may be associated with newcomers to the region. As the Arawakan groups expanded northward and eastward along major rivers, they were apparently replaced by Cariban and Salivan occupations in the Parguaza region. The shift in content we have described for the later periods of rock art may indicate a more typically Guianese form of ritual practice, less focused on hierarchy, specialty roles, and gender segregation typical of the Northwest Amazon, and more concerned with the relationships of alterity and insider/outsider dealings (Henley 2001). This suggestion merits further comparative research.

7. Final Remarks

Given the complexity of the rock art sequence in the Parguaza region and neighboring areas, we have only begun to touch on the potential for analysis of the images and their context. We have considered here significant shifts in emphasis over time in the larger rock shelters, where superpositioning has allowed us to discriminate between different periods, and the styles associated with them. The lengthy sequence ranges from the early, sporadic paintings of pre-ceramic occupations, to the extraordinary murals that we argue are associated with more sedentary, hierarchical societies centered on elaborate ritual performances, and finalizes with a swing toward more abstract representations, executed with less of an eye to realism, that may coincide with the arrival of new occupations to the region from the Guianas to the east. Continuity can be found throughout the sequence in (1) the use of the same sites and surfaces for paintings, often with intentional superpositioning, (2) the overall emphasis on the depiction of easily recognizable human and non-human figures, (3) the rarity of phytomorphic motifs, (4) the general lack of framing of panels, (5) infrequent interaction between figures, and (6) sufficient similarity between certain motifs as to suggest visitation between sites. Nonetheless, important differences between styles/periods can be found in (1) the type, color, and technique of painting typical of each style/period as described in Section 4, (2) the appearance of bichrome “ghost” figures, massive displays of fish and other zoomorphs, masked figures and interactive hunting/fishing scenes associated with styles/periods 3 and 4, and (3) the increase in geometric, abstract figures in styles/periods 5 and 6. These shifts in visual representation may imply different ontological perspectives and forms of practice.
The turn to perspectivism and animism in the ethnographic analogies employed in the recent interpretation of rock art sites in the Northwest Amazon has offered insights into the images and their possible meanings, especially in areas where indigenous peoples continue to ascribe meaning to the sites and figures they contain. As Whitley has observed for the North American Great Basin, “The ethnographic comments…reflect widespread cultural beliefs that are based on specific kinds of knowledge, and a non-Western/scientific ontological system” (Whitley 2013, p. 84). In this sense, the use of ethnographic analogy offers valid insights into shared belief systems in the longue durée. We have explored the relevance of the ethnographic information that characterizes the Northwest Amazon, with emphasis on the Arawakan traditions to interpret the shift associated with styles/periods 3 and 4. We must proceed with caution, nonetheless, the further back in time we go, as in the case of style/period 2, and in situations for which there is insufficient ethnographic information, such as those associated with styles/periods 5 and 6.
Variations that are specific to different time periods and types of sites, and how they relate to geographical features and resources, visibility, and accessibility, must ideally be taken into consideration when applying ethnographic analogy. Social relations and productive modes, while difficult to infer from the current archaeological record, most assuredly impacted the conceptions and practices associated with the rock art and need to be considered when seeking to understand the significance of the images and their context. To this end, in the future, it would be fruitful to expand the analysis we have presented in this study to include the paintings documented in smaller rock shelters and open-air sites and petroglyphs found both in riverine settings and on outcrops and rock shelters inland. Further investigations at rock art sites and related habitation sites would enable us to refine our knowledge of the contexts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.S. and K.T.d.S.; methodology, F.S. and K.T.d.S.; formal analysis, K.T.d.S.; fieldwork, F.S. and K.T.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.T.d.S.; writing—review and editing, F.S. and K.T.d.S.; funding acquisition, F.S. and K.T.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This fieldwork for this research was funded in part by the Consejo de Desarrollo Científica y Humanística of the Universidad Central de Venezuela, PI 05-00-6753-2007, co-directed by Kay Tarble e Scaramelli and Franz Scaramelli; and by funds from the Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Centro de Antropología, for the project No. 679, 2006-2012, directed by Franz Scaramelli.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions to this study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the authors. Data on the location of specific sites located in indigenous territory is unavailable due to ethical restrictions on sharing information without specific permission. The datasets presented in this article are not readily available as the data are part of an ongoing study.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank David Whitley for inviting us to participate in this special issue. We also wish to thank the reviewers for their comments and helpful suggestions. The authors acknowledge gratefully the support of the local communities who shared their hospitality and knowledge with us over decades working together in the field. We have also benefitted from on-going conversations with Edithe Pereira, John Greer, Stanford Zent, Pedro Rivas, Alexander Mansutti-Rodríguez, and Silvia Vidal. We dedicate this paper to the memory of our colleagues who served as mentors in pursuing the study of rock art in the Orinoco area: Omar González Ñáñez, Jonathan Hill, Jeannine Sujo-Volsky, Alberta Zucchi, and Miguel Ángel Perera, who donated his photos and tracings of BO-29.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Notes

1
Recent painting of graffiti at some sites, with the use of personal names and words such as “community” or “indigenous” has been noted, indicating ongoing visitation to the sites. Unfortunately, unscrupulous visitors have looted some sites, and burial bundles have been disturbed or removed, leading to reticence on the part of some indigenous communities to permit access to outsiders.
2
Colorado River tribes, for example, made large, pecked panels located at the base of Spirit Mountain, the site of the mythic creation of the world, where shamans travel to seek spiritual power on vision quests; boys created small, incised rocks with entoptic motifs as part of their puberty initiations; and large, figurative geoglyphs created at the site of specific mythic events were used for group pilgrimages led by shamans (Whitley 2023, pp. 286–88).
3
We have not included the toponyms and location of the rock art sites out of respect for the wishes of the communities who continue to occupy the area and who utilize many of the sites for burial practice or other ritual activities. The code names we use to refer to our project survey designation.
4
This is an ongoing project, and we are reporting preliminary results only.
5
Caputo Jaffe (2022) has interpreted similar clusters found in the nearby cave of Punta Brava as animals or humans in a canoe adjacent to representations of palm trees. She has associated these iconographies with the Tamanaco myth of the great flood.
6
Some motifs from BO-29, such as the snake-necked, knobby-kneed, heron fisher, are nearly identical to motifs found in Nueva Tolima (Hampson et al. 2024, figure 7), and the bipedal deer, large birds with outspread wings, lines of zoomorphs on horizontal lines being lassoed or prod by humans, and lines of dancers and supplicant humans are also found in the Parguaza and at La Lindosa and Chiribiquete in Colombian.
7
This conception of motifs as the “social skin” of the rock walls echoes the conception of the designs used by the Yekwana, a Carib-speaking group of the Upper Orinoco. Severi, drawing from Guss (1989), states
[T]he twill-plaited baskets, decorated with designs that every man has to weave to prepare for and confirm his marriage (and to accomplish his male initiation), are strictly connected with the ritual relations that humans entertain with nonhuman and mythical beings. The baskets incorporate a complex system of symbols that acts as an index and key to the rest of the culture….Actually, baskets are generally said to be the property of nonhuman supernatural “masters”. However, this notion of property often becomes much stronger: baskets as artifacts are themselves said to be “embodiments” (Guss 1989, p. 102) of the mythical beings. Like the ancestral predators they incarnate, they are “living beings” that can attack humans. Their designs woven into their surface are the “body paints” that decorate the skin of the mythical predators (ibid.). (Severi 2014, pp. 48–49)
8
Both groups are known to use caves with no rock art for burials as well.
9
“Musicalisation, or the production of musical sounds as a way of socialising relations with affines, non-human beings and various categories of ‘others’, is perhaps best understood as a process of creating a naturalised social space in which human interactions are densely interwoven with the sounds and behaviours of fish and other non-human animal species” (Hill 2013, p. 327).
10
This is not to deny their important potential as indicators of past environments and biodiversity (Lozada Mendieta et al. 2024; Korpershoek et al. 2024; Pereira and de Sousa e Silva 2022; Tarble de Scaramelli et al. 2021).
11
This is an aspect that deserves treatment beyond the scope of this paper. Fausto (2021) has delved into the notion of the duality in indigenous images, opting to describe it as a “fold” rather than an expression of animistic interiority. “The textile operation of the fold would allow both the separation and articulation “of the two domains into which the indigenous cosmos is divided: the solar state, extensive and discrete, which humans and other ordinary beings inhabit, and the intensive, virtual state where spirits dwell. The double is thus a replica in another frequency, which allows us to think of the duplication of the person as an unfolding of a body into multiple intensive selves-others (as I argue for the Kuikuro case)” (Fausto 2021, p. 1246).
12
Hill (2013, p. 331) notes that these ceremonies are held during the first few weeks of the wet season to coincide with the massive spawning migrations of Leporinus fish: “Throughout the ceremony, the dancing of men and women to the sounds of flutes and trumpets was closely associated with the spawning behaviors of migrating schools of Leporinus and other fish species”.
13
“Among northern Arawak-speaking peoples, furthermore, there is a strong belief in the association of primordial shamans and spirits with material places (large boulders in the rivers, caves, hills, depressions in the rocks of the rivers) in this world. Thus, there are numerous ‘stone-houses’ situated throughout each phratry’s territory that are places of the ‘first fruits’ and their spirit owners, yoopinai spirits, the mountaintop sources of all fish. Several of these places require appropriate behaviour when they are approached, such as silence, avoidance of looks so as not to attract or disturb the spirits, because they may give humans sickness. Others are ‘stone houses’ associated with primordial shamans, where people can solicit their protection from sickness or misfortune” (Wright et al. 2017, p. 190).
14
As Carlos Fausto (2000, p. 934) has summarized, “Amazonian societies are primarily oriented toward the production of persons, not material goods; that is, their focus is not the fabrication of objects through labor, but of persons through ritual and symbolic work. Birth and mortuary rites, initiations and naming ceremonies, shamanic and warfare festivals, seclusions and displays are all means for producing persons, for conferring on them singularity, beauty, fertility, agency, and the capacity to interact with external entities, like spirits, deities, animals, and enemies.”
15
In ethnographic documentation of petroglyphs associated with the voyages of Kuwai, rounded and swirl shapes are interpreted as the musical sounds emitted from the body of Kuwai or as the designs of the face paint of Ámarru, mother of Kuwai (Wright et al. 2017, p. 196; González Ñáñez 2020, p. 128).
16
Heckenberger gives a list of elements of material culture associated with the Arawaks that includes “ball games, hammocks, bull-roarers, atlatls, sacred flutes, wooden benches, masks, and idols—what we might call a cultural aesthetic of heightned ritual” (Heckenberger 2002, p. 112). As we have seen, many of these elements can be found in the rock paintings associated with styles 3 and 4 in the Parguaza sequence.

References

  1. Aceituno, Francisco Javier, Mark Robinson, Gaspar Morcote-Ríos, Ana María Aguirre, Jo Osborn, and José Iriarte. 2024. The peopling of Amazonia: Chrono-stratigraphic evidence from Serranía La Lindosa, Colombian Amazon. Quaternary Science Reviews 327: 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aceituno Bocanegra, Francisco J. 2010. El poblamiento temprano de la floresta húmeda de Colombia: Una síntesis regional para un modelo de poblamiento de la cabecera noroccidental de la cuenca del Amazonas. In Arqueologia amazônica. Edited by Edithe Pereira and Vera Guapindaia. Belém: MPEG/IPHAN/SECULT, pp. 16–33. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antczak, Andrzej, Bernardo Urbani, and Maria M. Antczak. 2017. Re-thinking the Migration of Cariban-Speakers from the Middle Orinoco River to North-Central Venezuela (AD 800). Journal of World Prehistory 30: 131–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Barse, William P. 1990. Preceramic occupations in the Orinoco River valley. Science 250: 1388–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Barse, William P. 2009. The early Ronquin paleosol and the Orinocan ceramic sequence. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 50: 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bonilla-Pérez, Amed, and José Carlos Frantz. 2013. Petrografía, geoquímica y geocronología del granito de Parguaza en Colombia. Boletín de Geología 35: 83–104. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brabec de Mori, Berndt, and Anthony Seeger. 2013. Introduction: Considering Music, Humans, and Non-humans. Ethnomusicology Forum 22: 269–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brites, Natasha. 1994. Espacios y tiempos sagrados: Tradiciones y ritos en las prácticas funerarias de los grupos Wánai y Wóthuja del sector Parguaza-Suapure, Edo. Bolívar. Undergraduate thesis, Escuela de Antropología, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela. [Google Scholar]
  9. Caputo Jaffe, Alessandra. 2022. Aproximación a las pictografías de Punta Brava y los registros de mitos diluvianos del Orinoco Medio. Revista Colombiana de Antropología 58: 139–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castaño-Uribe, Carlos. 2019. Chiribiquete. La Maloka Cósmica de los Hombres Jaguar. Bogota: Villegas Editores. [Google Scholar]
  11. Castaño-Uribe, Carlos, and Thomas Van der Hammen. 1998. El simbolismo pictórico de la serranía de Chiribiquete. In Parque Nacional Natural Chiribiquete: La peregrinación de los jaguares. Edited by Carlos Castaño Uribe. Bogotá: UAESPNN, Ministerio de Ambiente de Colombia. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cruxent, José M. 1946. Pinturas rupestres de El Carmen, en el río Parguaza, Estado Bolívar, Venezuela. Acta Científica Venezolana 2: 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cruxent, José M., and Irving Rouse. 1958–1959. An Archeological Chronology of Venezuela. Social Science Monographs 6 (2 vols.). Washington, DC: Pan American Union. [Google Scholar]
  14. De Valencia, Ruby, and Jeannine Sujo-Volsky. 1987. El diseño en los petroglifos venezolanos. Caracas: Fundación Pampero. [Google Scholar]
  15. Descola, Philippe. 1994. In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Descola, Philippe. 2012. Beyond nature and culture: The traffic of souls. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2: 473–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Durbin, Marshall. 1985. A survey of the Carib language family. In South American Indian Languages: Retrospect and Prospect. Edited by Manelis Klein Harriet E. and Louisa R. Stark. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 325–71. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fausto, Carlos. 2000. Of enemies and pets: Warfare and shamanism in Amazonia. American Ethnologist 26: 933–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fausto, Carlos. 2021. The ruses of Amerindian Art: A reply. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 11: 1244–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fausto, Carlos, and Eduardo G. Neves. 2018. Was there ever a Neolithic in the Neotropics? Plant familiarisation and biodiversity in the Amazon. Antiquity 92: 1604–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fundaredes. 2023. Economía Paralela y el Daño Ambiental en el Arco Minero del Orinoco. Available online: https://fundaredes.org/informes/2023-EPA-eonomia-paralela-y-el-dano-ambiental-en-el-arco-minero-del-orinoco.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2024).
  22. Galarraga, Alicia, Maritza Garicoechea, María Gabriela Montoto, Franz Scaramelli, and Kay Tarble. 2003. Estudio de los contextos culturales de la Cueva del Caño Ore, Edo. Bolívar. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Espeleología 37: 2–11. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gassón, Rafael. 2002. Orinoquia: The Archaeology of the Orinoco River Basin. Journal of World Prehistory 16: 237–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. González Ñáñez, Omar. 1980. Mitología Guarequena. Caracas: Monte Ávila. [Google Scholar]
  25. González Ñáñez, Omar. 1986. Sexualidad y Rituales de Iniciación entre los Indigenas Warekena del Río Guainía-Río Negro, TFA. Revista Montalbán 17: 103–108. [Google Scholar]
  26. González Ñáñez, Omar. 2020. La Lectura de las Piedras: Arte Rupestre y Culturas del Noroeste Amazónico. Boletín Antropológico 38: 107–41. [Google Scholar]
  27. Goulard, Jean-Pierre, and Dimitri Karadimas, eds. 2011. Masques des Hommes, Visages des Dieux. Paris: CNRS Éditions. [Google Scholar]
  28. Greer, John W. 1995. Rock art chronology in the Orinoco Basin of southwestern Venezuela. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. [Google Scholar]
  29. Greer, John W. 2001. Lowland South America. In Handbook of Rock Art Research. Edited by David Whitley. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press. [Google Scholar]
  30. Greer, John W., and Mavis Greer. 2006. Human figures in the cave paintings of southern Venezuela. In International Rock Art Congress Proceedings 3, Vol. 21-3. Flagstaff: American Indian Rock Art, pp. 155–66. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gunn, Robert G., Bruno David, Jean-Jacques Delannoy, Benjamin Smith, Augustine Unghangho, Ian Waina, Balanggarra Aboriginal Corporation, Leigh Douglas, Cecilia Myers, Pauline Heaney, and et al. 2022. Superpositions and superimpositions in rock art studies: Reading the rock face at Pundawar Manbur, Kimberley, northwest Australia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 67: 101442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guss, David M. 1989. To Weave and to Sing: Art, Symbol, and Narrative in the South American Rain Forest. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  33. Halbmayer, Ernst. 2012. Amerindian mereology: Animism, analogy, and the multiverse. Indiana 29: 103–25. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hampson, Jamie, José Iriarte, and Francisco Javier Aceituno. 2024. ‘A World of Knowledge’: Rock art, ritual, and indigenous belief at Serranía de la Lindosa in the Colombian Amazon. Arts 13: 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Harman, J. 2009. Image Enhancement Using dStretch. Available online: www.dStretch.com (accessed on 4 October 2024).
  36. Heckenberger, Michael J. 2002. Rethinking the Arawakan diaspora. In Comparative Arawakan Histories: Rethinking Language Family and Culture Area in Amazonia. Edited by Jonathan D. Hill and Fernando Santos-Granero. Urbana: University of Illinois, pp. 99–122. [Google Scholar]
  37. Henley, Paul. 2001. Inside and Out: Alterity and the Ceremonial Construction of the Person in the Guianas. In Beyond the Visible and the Material: The Amerindianization of society in the work of Peter Rivière. Edited by Larura M. Rival and Neil L. Whitehead. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197–220. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hill, Jonathan D. 1993. Keepers of the Sacred Chants: The Poetics of Ritual Power in an Amazonian Society. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hill, Jonathan D. 1996. Ethnogenesis in the Northwest Amazon. In History, Power and Identity. Edited by Jonathan D. Hill. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, pp. 142–60. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hill, Jonathan D. 2002. Shamanism, Colonialism and the Wild Woman: Fertility Cultism and Historical Dynamics in the Upper Río Negro Region. In Comparative Arawakan Histories: Rethinking Language Family and Culture Area in Amazonia. Edited by Jonathan D. Hill and Fernando Santos Granero. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 223–47. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hill, Jonathan D. 2011. Sacred landscapes as environmental histories in lowland South America. In Ethnicity in Ancient Amazonia: Reconstructing Past Identities through Archaeology, Linguistics, and Ethnohistory. Edited by Alf Hornborg and Jonathan D. Hill. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, pp. 259–77. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hill, Jonathan D. 2013. Instruments of Power: Musicalising the Other in Lowland South America. Ethnomusicology Forum 3: 323–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hill, Jonathan D., and Fernando Santos-Granero, eds. 2002. Comparative Arawakan Histories: Rethinking Language Family and Culture Area in Amazonia. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hill, Jonathan D., and Robin M. Wright. 1988. Time, narrative and ritual. Historical interpretations from an Amazonian society. In Rethinking History and Myth: Indigenous South American Perspectives on the Past. Edited by Jonathan D. Hill. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 78–105. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hornborg, Alf, and Jonathan D. Hill, eds. 2011a. Ethnicity in Ancient Amazonia: Reconstructing Past Identities Through Archaeology, Linguistics, and Ethnohistory. Boulder: University of Colorado Press. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hornborg, Alf, and Jonathan D. Hill. 2011b. Introduction: Ethnicity in Ancient Amazonia. In Ethnicity in Ancient Amazonia: Reconstructing Past Identities through Archaeology, Linguistics, and Ethnohistory. Edited by Alf Hornborg and Jonathan D. Hill. Boulder: University of Colorado Press, pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hornborg, Alf, and Love Eriksen. 2011. An attempt to understand Panoan ethnogenesis in relation to long-term patterns and transformations of regional interaction in Western Amazonia. In Ethnicity in Ancient Amazonia: Reconstructing Past Identities through Archaeology, Linguistics, and Ethnohistory. Edited by Alf Hornborg and Jonathan D. Hill. Boulder: University of Colorado Press, pp. 129–51. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hugh-Jones, Stephen. 2016. Writing on stone; writing on paper: Myth, history and memory in NW Amazonia. History and Anthropology 27: 154–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Iriarte, José, Mark Robinson, Francisco Javier Aceituno, Gaspar Morcote-Ríos, and Michael Ziegler. 2022. The Painted Forest: Rock Art and Archaeology in the Colombian Amazon. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kelly, Harold J. 2009. Rock Art of Aruba. In Rock Art of the Caribbean. Edited by Michele Hayward, Lesley-Gail Atkinson and Michael A. Cinquino. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, pp. 175–87. [Google Scholar]
  51. Koch-Grünberg, Theodor. [1925] 2008. Del Roraima al Orinoco. Caracas: Ernesto Armitano Editores, Vol. III. First published 1925. [Google Scholar]
  52. Koch-Grünberg, Theodor. [1907] 2010. Petróglifos Sul-Americanos. Edited by Edithe Pereira. Belem/São Paulo: Museo Paraense Emílio Goeldi. First published 1907. [Google Scholar]
  53. Korpershoek, Mirte, Sally C. Reynolds, Marcin Budka, and Philip Riris. 2024. Old and New Approaches in Rock Art: Using Animal Motifs to Identify Palaeohabitats. Quaternary 7: 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lathrap, Donald W. 1970. The Upper Amazon. Ancient Peoples and Places Series; London: Thames and Hudson. [Google Scholar]
  55. Lozada Mendieta, Natalia, José R. Oliver, and Phillip Riris. 2016. Archaeology in the Átures Rapids of the Middle Orinoco, Venezuela: A research update. Archaeology International 19: 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lozada Mendieta, Natalia, José R. Oliver, Sergio Estrada Villegas, Lizeth Stephany Guzmán, and Samuel Yung. 2024. Peces al lado y lado del Medio Orinoco: Biodiversidad en tres sitios arqueológicos de los llanos del Norte de Suramérica. In Fauna y Manifestaciones Rupestres en América Latina. Edited by Aline Lara Galicia and Carmen Pérez Maestro. Sevilla: Enredars Publicaciones, pp. 78–98. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lozada Mendieta, Natalia, Phillip Riris, and José R. Oliver. 2022. Beads and stamps in the Middle Orinoco: Archaeological evidence for interaction and exchange in the Atures Rapids from AD 1000 to 1480. Latin American Antiquity 34: 742–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mansutti Rodríguez, Alexander. 2006. Warime: La Fiesta: Flautas, trompas y poder en el noroeste amazónica. Ciudad Guayana: Fondo Editorial Universidad Nacional Experimental de Guayana. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mansutti Rodríguez, Alexander. 2012. Yuruparí: Máscaras y Poder entre los Piaroas del Orinoco. Espaço Ameríndio 6: 46–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mansutti Rodríguez, Alexander. 2019. Warime Piaroa, cuatro performances y un rito. Revista Colombiana de Antropología 55: 149–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mansutti Rodríguez, Alexander, and Noël Bonneuill. 1994–1996. Dispersión y asentamiento interfluvial llanero: Dos razones de sobrevivencia en el Orinoco Medio del post-contacto. Antropológica 84: 43–72. [Google Scholar]
  62. Morey, Robert V., and Nancy Morey. 1975. Relaciones comerciales en el pasado en los Llanos de Colombia y Venezuela. Montalbán 4: 533–64. [Google Scholar]
  63. Motta, Ana Paula, Martin Porr, and Peter Veth. 2020. Recursivity in Kimberley Rock Art Production, Western Australia. In Places of Memory: Spatialised Practices of Remembrance from Prehistory to Today. Edited by Christian Hornm, Gustav Wollentz, Annette Haug and Gianpiero di Maida. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 137–49. [Google Scholar]
  64. Muñoz Castiblanco, Guillermo. 2020. Estética amazónica y discusiones contemporáneas: El arte rupestre de la serranía La Lindosa, Guaviare—Colombia. Calle 14: Revista de Investigación en el Campo del Arte 15: 14–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Oliver, José R. 1989. The Archaeological, Linguistic and Ethnohistorical Evidence for the Expansion of Arawakan into Northwestern Venezuela and Northeastern Colombia. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. [Google Scholar]
  66. Overing, Joanna, and Alan Passes, eds. 2000. The Anthropology of Love and Anger: The Aesthetics of Conviviality in Native Amazonia. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  67. Overing, Joanna, and M. R. Kaplan. 1988. Los Piaroa (Wóthuha). In Los Aborígenes de Venezuela. Edited by Walter Coppens. Etnología Contemportánea. Caracas: Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales-Monte Ávila, vol. III, pp. 307–417. [Google Scholar]
  68. Páez, Leonardo. 2021. Arte Rupestre del Corredor Terrestre-Fluvial Negro-Orinoco-Lago de Valencia. Avances de Investigación. In Manifestacions Rupestres en América Latina. Instituto Universitario de Estudios sobre América Latina. Edited by A. Lara Galicia. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla. [Google Scholar]
  69. Pearce, David G. 2012. Ethnography and history: The significance of social change in interpreting rock art. In Working with Rock Art: Recording, Presenting and Understanding Rock Art Using Indigenous Knowledge. Edited by Benjamin W. Smith, Knut Helskogand and David Morris. South Africa: Witts University Press, pp. 135–45. [Google Scholar]
  70. Pereira, Edithe, and José de Sousa e Silva, Jr. 2022. Representations of Primates in Petroglyphs of the Brazilian Amazonia. In World Archaeoprimatology: Interconnections of Humans and Nonhuman Primates in the Past. Edited by Bernardo Urbani, Dionisios Youlatos and Andrzej Antczak. Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–71. [Google Scholar]
  71. Perera, Miguel Á. 1983. Sobre un cementario Piaroa en Parguaza, Distrito Cedeño, Estado Bolivar. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Espeleología 20: 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  72. Perera, Miguel Á. 1992. Los últimos Wanai (Mapoyas). Contribución al conocimiento de otro pueblo amerindio que desaparece. Revista Española de Antropología Americana 22: 139. Available online: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/REAA/article/view/REAA9292110139A (accessed on 22 October 2024).
  73. Perera, Miguel Á, and Hyram M. Moreno. 1984. Pictografías y cerámica de dos localidades hipogeas de la Penillanura del Norte T.F.A. y Dto. Cedeño, Estado Bolívar. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Espeleología 21: 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  74. Reichel-Dolmatoff, Gerardo. 1971. Amazonian Cosmos: The Sexual and Religious Symbolism of the Tukano Indians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  75. Reichel-Dolmatoff, Gerardo. 1987. Shamanism and Art of the Eastern Tukanoan Indians. Leiden: E.J. Brill. [Google Scholar]
  76. Riris, Philip. 2017. On confluence and contestation in the Orinoco interaction sphere: The engraved rock art of the Atures Rapids. Antiquity 91: 1603–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Riris, Philip, and José Oliver. 2019. Patterns of style, diversity, and similarity in Middle Orinoco rock art assemblages. Arts 8: 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Riris, Philip, José Oliver, and Natalia Lozada Mendieta. 2024. Monumental snake engravings of the Orinoco River. Antiquity 98: 724–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rivas, Pedro. 1993. Estudio Preliminar de los Petroglifos de Punta Cedeño, Caicara del Orinoco, Estado Bolívar. In Cobtribuciones a la Arqueología Regional de Venezuela. Edited by Francisco Javier Fernández and Rafael Gassón. Caracas: Asociación Venezolana de Arqueología, Fondo Editorial Acta Científica Venezolana, pp. 165–94. [Google Scholar]
  80. Roosevelt, Anna C. 1980. Parmana: Prehistoric Maize and Manioc Subsistence Along the Amazon and Orinoco. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  81. Rouse, Irving. 1985. Arawakan phylogeny, Caribbean chronology, and their implications for the study of population movement. Journal of New World Archaeology 5: 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  82. Rozwadowski, Andrzej. 2017. Travelling through the Rock to the Otherworld: The Shamanic ‘Grammar of Mind’ within the rock art of Siberia. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27: 413–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sanoja, Mario, and Iraida Vargas. 1970. La Cueva de “El Elefante”. Investigaciones Arqueológicas en el Bajo Orinoco: Estado Bolívar, Venezuela. Proyecto Orinoco, Informe 2. Caracas: Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales, Universidad Central de Venezuela. [Google Scholar]
  84. Santos-Granero, Fernando. 1998. Writing History into the Landscape: Space, Myth, and Ritual in Contemporary Amazonia. American Ethnologist 25: 128–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Santos-Granero, Fernando. 2002. The Arawakan Matrix: Ethos, Language, and History in Native South America. In Comparative Arawakan Histories: Rethinking Language Family and Culture Area in Amazonia. Edited by Jonathan D. Hill and Fernando Santos-Granero. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 25–50. [Google Scholar]
  86. Santos-Granero, Fernando. 2004. Arawakan sacred landscapes. Emplaced myths, place rituals, and the production of locality in Western Amazonia. In Kultur, Raum, Landschaft. Zur Bedeutung des Raumes in Zeiten der Globalitat. Edited by Ernst Halbmayer and Elke Mader. Frankfurt am Main: Brandes and Apsel, pp. 93–122. [Google Scholar]
  87. Santos-Granero, Fernando. 2009. The Occult Life of Things: Native American Theories of Materiality and Personhood. Flagstaff: University of Arizona Press. [Google Scholar]
  88. Scaramelli, Franz. 1992. Las Pinturas Rupestres del Parguaza: Mito y Representación. Undergraduate thesis, Escuela de Antropología, FaCES, Univertro de Estudios Avanzasidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela. [Google Scholar]
  89. Scaramelli, Franz, and Kay Tarble. 1996. Contenido arqueológico y etnográfico de los sitios de interés espeleohistórico del Orinoco medio, Bolívar, Venezuela. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Espeleología 30: 20–32. [Google Scholar]
  90. Scaramelli, Franz, and Kay Tarble de Scaramelli. 2018. Rock art in the construction of landscape, Parguaza River Basin, Venezuela. In Archaeologies of rock art: South American perspectives. Edited by Andrés Troncoso, Felipe Armstrong and George Nash. London: Routledge, pp. 85–105. [Google Scholar]
  91. Severi, Carlo. 2014. Transmutating beings: A proposal for an anthropology of thought. HAU Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4: 41–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Skinner, Andrew, and Sam Challis. 2022. Fluidities of personhood in the idioms of the Maloti-Drakensberg, past and present, and their use in incorporating contextual ethnographies in southern African rock art research. Time and Mind 15: 101–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Stahl, Peter W. 2014. Perspectival Ontology and Animal Non-Domestication in the Amazon Basin. In Antes de Orellana. Actas del 3er Encuentro Internacional de Arqueología Amazónica. Edited by Stéphen Rostain. Quito: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andines, pp. 221–31. [Google Scholar]
  94. Stoffle, Richard, Kathleen Van Vlack, Alannah Bell, and Bianca Eguino Uribe. 2024. Storied Rocks: Portals to Other Dimensions. Arts 13: 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sujo-Volsky, Jeannine. 1975. El Estudio del Arte Rupestre en Venezuela. Montalbán 4: 709–840. [Google Scholar]
  96. Tarble, Kay. 1985. Un nuevo modelo de expansión Caribe para la época prehispánica. Antropológica 63–64: 45–81. [Google Scholar]
  97. Tarble, Kay. 1991. Piedras y Potencia, Pintura y Poder: Estilos Sagrados en el Orinoco Medio. Antropológica 75–76: 141–64. [Google Scholar]
  98. Tarble, Kay, and Franz Scaramelli. 1995. Una correlación preliminar entre alfarerías y el arte rupestre del Municipio Autónimo Cedeño. In Proceedings of the XV International Congress of Caribbean Archaeology. Edited by Ricardo E. Alegría and Miguel Rodríguez. San Juan de Puerto Rico: Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Puerto Rico y el Caribe, pp. 581–94. [Google Scholar]
  99. Tarble, Kay, and Franz Scaramelli. 1999. Style, Function, and Context in the Rock Art of the Middle Orinoco Area. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Espeleología 33: 17–33. [Google Scholar]
  100. Tarble de Scaramelli, Kay, and Franz Scaramelli. 2010. El arte rupestre y su contexto arqueológico en el Orinoco Medio, Venezuela. In Arqueologia Amazonica. Edited by Edithe Pereira and Vera Guapindaia. Belém: MPEG/IPHAN/SECULT, pp. 285–315. [Google Scholar]
  101. Tarble de Scaramelli, Kay, and Franz Scaramelli. 2017. Anchoring the landscape: Human utilization of the Cerro Gavilán 2 Rockshelter, Middle Orinoco, from the Early Holocene to the present. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas 12: 429–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tarble de Scaramelli, Kay, and Franz Scaramelli. 2021. Cueva de Amalivaca: Tradición y memoria. Boletín Antropológico 39: 35–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tarble de Scaramelli, Kay, Carlos A. Lasso, and Franz Scaramelli. 2021. La representación faunística en las pinturas rupestres del bajo Parguaza y su relación con la caza y pesca de subsistencia, Orinoco medio, Venezuela. In La Caza y Pesca de Subsistencia en el Norte de Suramérica, Parte 1: Colombia, Venezuela y Guyana. Edited by Carlos A. Lasso and Mónica A. Morales-Betancourt. Serie Editorial Fauna Silvestre Neotropical; Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, pp. 433–61. [Google Scholar]
  104. Turner, Terence S. 1995. Social body and embodied subject: Bodiliness, subjectivity, and sociality among the Kayapo. Cultural Anthropology 10: 143–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Turner, Terence S. 2009. The Crisis of Late Structuralism. Perspectivism and Animism: Rethinking Culture, Nature, Spirit, and Bodiliness. Tipití 7: 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Urbani, Franco, and Eugenio Szczerban. 1975. Formas pseudo-cársicas en granito Rapakivi Precámbrico, Territorio Federal Amazonas. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Espeleología 6: 57–70. [Google Scholar]
  107. Vargas, Iraida. 1981. Investigaciones arqueológicas en Parmana: Los sitios de la Gruta y Ronquín, Estado Guárico, Venezuela. Caracas: Academia Nacional de Historia. [Google Scholar]
  108. Vidal, Silvia M. 2000. Kuwé Duwákalumi: The Arawak Sacred Routes of Migration, Trade and Resistance. Ethnohistory 47: 635–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Vidal, Silvia M. 2002. Secret Religious Cults and Political Leadership: Multiethnic Confederacies from Northwestern Amazonia. In Comparative Arawakan Histories: Rethinking Language Family and Culture Area in Amazonia. Edited by Jonathan D. Hill and Fernando Santos-Granero. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 248–68. [Google Scholar]
  110. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1996. Images of Nature and Society in Amazonian Ethnology. Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 179–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1998. Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4: 469–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Whitley, David S. 1994. By the hunter for the gatherer: Art, social relations and subsistence change in the prehistoric Great Basin. World Archaeology 25: 356–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Whitley, David S. 2013. Archaeologists, Indians, and Evolutionary Psychology: Aspects of Rock Art Research. Time and Mind 6: 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Whitley, David S. 2023. Ethnography, shamanism, and rock art. Boletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino 28: 275–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wright, Robin M. 1998. “Review of Yurupari: Studies of an Amazonian Foundation Myth, by Gerardo Reichel-Dolmatoff. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1996.” Australian Journal of Anthropology. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/1634135/Yurupary_by_Reichel_Dolmatoff (accessed on 29 January 2024).
  116. Wright, Robin M. 2011. Arawakan flute cults of Lowland South America: The domestication of predation and the production of agentivity. In Burst of Breath: Indigenous Ritual Wind Instruments in Lowland South America. Edited by Jonathan Hill and Jean-Pierre Chaumeil. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 325–53. [Google Scholar]
  117. Wright, Robin M., and Jonathan D. Hill. 1986. History, Ritual, and Myth: Nineteenth Century Millenarian Movements in the Northwest Amazon. Ethnohistory 33: 31–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wright, Robin, Omar González-Ñáñez, and Carlos César Xavier Leal. 2017. Multi-centric mythscapes. In Pilgrimage and Ambiguity. Edited by A. Hobart and Thierry Zarcone. Canon Pyon: Sean Kingston, pp. 201–31. [Google Scholar]
  119. Zucchi, Alberta. 2002. A new model of the northern Arawakan expansion. In Comparative Arawakan Histories: Rethinking Language Family and Culture Area in Amazonia. Edited by Jonathan D. Hill and Fernando Santos-Granero. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois, pp. 199–222. [Google Scholar]
  120. Zucchi, Alberta, Kay Tarble, and J. Eduardo Vaz. 1984. The ceramic sequence and new TL and C-14 dates for the Agüerito site of the Middle Orinoco, Venezuela. Journal of Field Archaeology 11: 55–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Parguaza Valley, showing (a) distant mountains, inselbergs and forest, and (b) savannah and surrounding hills.
Figure 1. Parguaza Valley, showing (a) distant mountains, inselbergs and forest, and (b) savannah and surrounding hills.
Arts 14 00051 g001
Figure 2. Inselberg with opening to rock art site BO-35.
Figure 2. Inselberg with opening to rock art site BO-35.
Arts 14 00051 g002
Figure 3. (a) View of rock shelter with rock art panel on ceiling and back walls at BO-35; (b) Grinding facets at BO-126; (c) View of rock shelter with grinding facets in the foreground and looting holes in the center and back of shelter; rock art is on back walls; (d) Close-up of grinding facets at BO-126.
Figure 3. (a) View of rock shelter with rock art panel on ceiling and back walls at BO-35; (b) Grinding facets at BO-126; (c) View of rock shelter with grinding facets in the foreground and looting holes in the center and back of shelter; rock art is on back walls; (d) Close-up of grinding facets at BO-126.
Arts 14 00051 g003
Figure 4. Large panel with superimposed figures of different styles/periods, BO-29.
Figure 4. Large panel with superimposed figures of different styles/periods, BO-29.
Arts 14 00051 g004
Figure 5. Superpositioning of different styles/periods at BO-35.
Figure 5. Superpositioning of different styles/periods at BO-35.
Arts 14 00051 g005
Figure 6. Scene depicting interaction between figures, BO-29.
Figure 6. Scene depicting interaction between figures, BO-29.
Arts 14 00051 g006
Figure 7. Location of rock art sites included in the study: 1: BO-35, 2: BO-126, 3: BO27-B, 4: BO-26-B, 5: BO-29. Inset: study area in the context of Venezuela and northern South America.
Figure 7. Location of rock art sites included in the study: 1: BO-35, 2: BO-126, 3: BO27-B, 4: BO-26-B, 5: BO-29. Inset: study area in the context of Venezuela and northern South America.
Arts 14 00051 g007
Figure 8. Superpositioning at BO-35 with examples of figures from different styles/periods. (2) Style/period 2; (3) Style/period 3, fish, turtle, unidentified quadrupeds; (4) Style/period 4, outlined crosses; (5) Style/period 5, black “winged” connected circles and solid zoomorphs; see also Figure 18b-4 for a closer view of this motif; (6) Style/period 5 or 6 bright red geometrics.
Figure 8. Superpositioning at BO-35 with examples of figures from different styles/periods. (2) Style/period 2; (3) Style/period 3, fish, turtle, unidentified quadrupeds; (4) Style/period 4, outlined crosses; (5) Style/period 5, black “winged” connected circles and solid zoomorphs; see also Figure 18b-4 for a closer view of this motif; (6) Style/period 5 or 6 bright red geometrics.
Arts 14 00051 g008
Figure 9. Style/period 2, purplish, fine-lined figures. (a) BO-35, oval/fish with internal lines; (b) BO-29, bird; (c) BO-29, reptile and bird with spread wings; (d) BO-29, reptile and unidentified quadruped; (e) BO-35, line of unidentified quadrupeds with internal lines.
Figure 9. Style/period 2, purplish, fine-lined figures. (a) BO-35, oval/fish with internal lines; (b) BO-29, bird; (c) BO-29, reptile and bird with spread wings; (d) BO-29, reptile and unidentified quadruped; (e) BO-35, line of unidentified quadrupeds with internal lines.
Arts 14 00051 g009
Figure 10. Mural at BO-27-B with style/period 3: (a) “ghost” figures, (b) deer, and (c) other unidentified figures.
Figure 10. Mural at BO-27-B with style/period 3: (a) “ghost” figures, (b) deer, and (c) other unidentified figures.
Arts 14 00051 g010
Figure 11. Various style/period 3 zoomorphic figures at BO-26-B: (1) armadillo, (2) fish, (3) iguana, (4) possible deer, and (5) snake.
Figure 11. Various style/period 3 zoomorphic figures at BO-26-B: (1) armadillo, (2) fish, (3) iguana, (4) possible deer, and (5) snake.
Arts 14 00051 g011
Figure 12. Style/period 4 masked figures from BO-29.
Figure 12. Style/period 4 masked figures from BO-29.
Arts 14 00051 g012
Figure 13. Stick figures (ad) from BO-29 and (e) from BO-35. (a) Possible transformation human/amphibian, (b) supplicant figures, (c) kneeling anthropomorph, (d) falling figure, positioned around hole in wall, (e) supplicant figures.
Figure 13. Stick figures (ad) from BO-29 and (e) from BO-35. (a) Possible transformation human/amphibian, (b) supplicant figures, (c) kneeling anthropomorph, (d) falling figure, positioned around hole in wall, (e) supplicant figures.
Arts 14 00051 g013
Figure 14. Style/period 4 zoomorphic figures (ad,f, BO-29; e, BO-35): (a,b,e) quadrupeds in line, photo enhanced with D-Stretch flt_yre, (c) zoomorphs including paired turtles, birds, quadrupeds, schools of fish. See armed male anthropomorph in lower right corner, (f) frog.
Figure 14. Style/period 4 zoomorphic figures (ad,f, BO-29; e, BO-35): (a,b,e) quadrupeds in line, photo enhanced with D-Stretch flt_yre, (c) zoomorphs including paired turtles, birds, quadrupeds, schools of fish. See armed male anthropomorph in lower right corner, (f) frog.
Arts 14 00051 g014
Figure 15. Style/period 4 geometric figures. (a) Concentric circles with internal lines BO-27, (b) outlined cross BO-29, (c) multiple outlined cross BO-29, see also Figure 8 (d) concentric circles, and concentric rhombus BO-29, (e) circle grid and vertical lines crossed by horizontal bar (BO-29).
Figure 15. Style/period 4 geometric figures. (a) Concentric circles with internal lines BO-27, (b) outlined cross BO-29, (c) multiple outlined cross BO-29, see also Figure 8 (d) concentric circles, and concentric rhombus BO-29, (e) circle grid and vertical lines crossed by horizontal bar (BO-29).
Arts 14 00051 g015
Figure 16. Scenes with interacting figures (BO-29). (a) Anthropomorph pointing/jabbing at quadruped framed by a style/period 3 “ghost” figure, (b) bird interacting with fish, (c) anthropomorph aiming with atlatl at deer, (d) bird interacting with fish, (e) vertical trap (?) enclosing fish and human figure (image modified with D-Stretch lds_cf), (f) anthropomorph interacting with quadrupeds, one of which appears to be butchered, (g) anthropomorph leading/lassoing line of quadrupeds, possibly toward enclosure, (h) male figure spearing quadruped with weighted spear, (i) anthropomorph on line with quadruped (feline?) framed by a style/period 3 figure.
Figure 16. Scenes with interacting figures (BO-29). (a) Anthropomorph pointing/jabbing at quadruped framed by a style/period 3 “ghost” figure, (b) bird interacting with fish, (c) anthropomorph aiming with atlatl at deer, (d) bird interacting with fish, (e) vertical trap (?) enclosing fish and human figure (image modified with D-Stretch lds_cf), (f) anthropomorph interacting with quadrupeds, one of which appears to be butchered, (g) anthropomorph leading/lassoing line of quadrupeds, possibly toward enclosure, (h) male figure spearing quadruped with weighted spear, (i) anthropomorph on line with quadruped (feline?) framed by a style/period 3 figure.
Arts 14 00051 g016
Figure 17. Figures placed as if emanating from cracks or crevices in walls of rock shelters. (a) BO-27 with multiple figures above lower opening; rectangular area is amplified in (b). (b) Detail of (a); image enhanced with D-Stretch _yrd. (c) BO-29 with figures “emerging” from lower opening (d) BO-29, figures and red smears above crack.
Figure 17. Figures placed as if emanating from cracks or crevices in walls of rock shelters. (a) BO-27 with multiple figures above lower opening; rectangular area is amplified in (b). (b) Detail of (a); image enhanced with D-Stretch _yrd. (c) BO-29 with figures “emerging” from lower opening (d) BO-29, figures and red smears above crack.
Arts 14 00051 g017
Figure 18. Style/period 5 figures from BO-35. (a) (1) Polychrome joined circle grid, (2) red and black figure, (3) black outlined white “winged” figure, (b) (1) double “barbell” figures, (2) red “winged” joined circles, (3) red turtle superimposed over period 3 quadrupeds, (4) red and black “winged” concentric circles joined with parallel vertical lines.
Figure 18. Style/period 5 figures from BO-35. (a) (1) Polychrome joined circle grid, (2) red and black figure, (3) black outlined white “winged” figure, (b) (1) double “barbell” figures, (2) red “winged” joined circles, (3) red turtle superimposed over period 3 quadrupeds, (4) red and black “winged” concentric circles joined with parallel vertical lines.
Arts 14 00051 g018
Figure 19. Style/period 6. (a) White and white/dull red figures overlaying style/period 3 and 4 in BO-126, (b) white stick figure (BO-29), (c) white figure with 2 antennae (?) (BO-29, (d) large panel with white and yellow style/period 6 figures overlying red style/period 4 figures (BO-126) (enhanced with Photoshop), (e) paired white and yellow reptiles (BO-126), (f) paired white and yellow anthropomorphs (BO-126).
Figure 19. Style/period 6. (a) White and white/dull red figures overlaying style/period 3 and 4 in BO-126, (b) white stick figure (BO-29), (c) white figure with 2 antennae (?) (BO-29, (d) large panel with white and yellow style/period 6 figures overlying red style/period 4 figures (BO-126) (enhanced with Photoshop), (e) paired white and yellow reptiles (BO-126), (f) paired white and yellow anthropomorphs (BO-126).
Arts 14 00051 g019
Figure 20. Drawings of Cubeo masks illustrated in Koch-Grünberg ([1907] 2010, p. 75).
Figure 20. Drawings of Cubeo masks illustrated in Koch-Grünberg ([1907] 2010, p. 75).
Arts 14 00051 g020
Figure 21. Samples of superpositioning from BO-29 (ad) and BO-35 (e,f). (a) “Ghost” figure framing hunting scene, turtle, and others. (b) Large fish framing quadruped and turtle; circle surrounding anthropomorph interacting with small quadruped image modified with D-Stretch flt_lds. (c) Large rodent (?) framing anthropomorph with atlatl aiming at quadruped; image modified with D-Stretch_yre. (d) Large deer (?) framing turtle. (e) Quadruped framing multiple outlined crosses. (f) Same figure as (e) with yellow, abstract design painted over previous layers; image modified with D-Stretch_flt_lds.
Figure 21. Samples of superpositioning from BO-29 (ad) and BO-35 (e,f). (a) “Ghost” figure framing hunting scene, turtle, and others. (b) Large fish framing quadruped and turtle; circle surrounding anthropomorph interacting with small quadruped image modified with D-Stretch flt_lds. (c) Large rodent (?) framing anthropomorph with atlatl aiming at quadruped; image modified with D-Stretch_yre. (d) Large deer (?) framing turtle. (e) Quadruped framing multiple outlined crosses. (f) Same figure as (e) with yellow, abstract design painted over previous layers; image modified with D-Stretch_flt_lds.
Arts 14 00051 g021
Figure 22. Map of sacred and secular places related to Kuwai routes (Vidal 2000, p. 646). Shared with permission of the author.
Figure 22. Map of sacred and secular places related to Kuwai routes (Vidal 2000, p. 646). Shared with permission of the author.
Arts 14 00051 g022
Figure 23. Examples of possible phytomorphs found in BO-29 (ad) and BO-35. (a) Palm (?). (b) Anthropomorph in tree spearing (?) deer. (c) Unidentified phytomorph. (d) Series of gourd-like fruits on stem, or string of tubers. (e) String of tubers (?) hanging from horizontal line with series of quadrupeds above. Image enhanced by D-Stretch flt_yre.
Figure 23. Examples of possible phytomorphs found in BO-29 (ad) and BO-35. (a) Palm (?). (b) Anthropomorph in tree spearing (?) deer. (c) Unidentified phytomorph. (d) Series of gourd-like fruits on stem, or string of tubers. (e) String of tubers (?) hanging from horizontal line with series of quadrupeds above. Image enhanced by D-Stretch flt_yre.
Arts 14 00051 g023
Table 1. Motifs and diagnostic characteristics of the periods/styles defined for the sites referred to in this paper (after Greer (1995), with some modifications).
Table 1. Motifs and diagnostic characteristics of the periods/styles defined for the sites referred to in this paper (after Greer (1995), with some modifications).
Style/PeriodFigure/MotifSitesDiagnostic Characteristics
2
Pre-ceramic
Lizard, bird, armadilloBO-27-B
BO-29
BO-35
Fine lines; thin, purplish paint
Fish Vertical interior lines; thin, purplish paint; light red paint, vertical placement, often aligned in series
Anthropomorphs, zoomorphs Broad lines; light red paint
3
Early
Ceramic
Anthropomorphs, “ghost figures”, quadrupeds (especially deer), possible flute player BO-26-B
BO-27-B
BO-29
BO-35
BO-126
Large figures (some life-sized or larger)
Solid white or yellow paint outlined with red paint
Some action between figures
Fish (various identifiable species), stingray, turtle, feline, bottlenose dolphin, armadillo, tapir, capybara, snake, amphibians (realistic) 1 Solid white paint, outlined with red paint, some interior lines
Vertical, lateral, or dorsal
String of “gourds”
Round, flat “basket” designs; large, rectangular “textile/mat” designs Red/white bichrome; interior geometric designs
Unidentified figures Yellow paint
4
Early
Ceramic
Small, monochrome zoomorphic figures: fish, deer, tapir, birds, lizard, turtle, feline, etc.BO-27-B
BO-29
BO-35
BO-126
Red paint predominates with variations between light red, dark red, and orange
Figures tend to be small to medium size
Anthropomorphic figures with
headdresses and rectangular or triangular body coverings or long masks
Theriomorphs combining human and non-human features: snake/bird/human; bipedal deer
Small “scenes” of human/non-human figures interacting, hunting with throwing stick or spear thrower/atl atl
Falling anthropomorphic figures
Anthropomorphic figures of various linear types
Zoomorphic and anthropomorphic figures placed on horizontal lines
Cultural objects: baskets, maracas, nets or fishing traps, woven mats
Phytomorphic figures (rare)
Outlined crosses, sometimes multiple
Concentric circles and rhombuses
Segmented box or square
Parallel dotted lines
“Netting”, open, connected lines
5
Late
Ceramic
Paired zoomorphic figures
Circle with internal lines (turtle shell?)
Winged circles, circle grids, and chains,
“textile” or “basket” designs
 
Crosses and outlined crosses
BO-26-B
BO-29
BO-35
Dark red paint with thick lines
Black paint
Bichrome red and white paint, less symmetrical
Bichrome red and black paint
Polychrome red, black, and white paint
6
Late
Ceramic
Anthropomorphs with rectangular, solid bodies
Paired figures in contrasting colors
BO-26-B
BO-29
BO-35
BO-126
Thick, white, pink, and yellow paint predominates
Sloppy execution
Rabbit, lizard, fish
“Maracas”
Concentric circles with interior divisions
Meandering lines
Smears
Period 7
Colonial
To present
“COMUNIDAD”
“KH”
“Kiloin”
BO-126Text in cream-colored paint
Very recent; painted after our first visit
1 See identification in Tarble de Scaramelli et al. (2021).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tarble de Scaramelli, K.; Scaramelli, F. Predation, Propitiation and Performance: Ethnographic Analogy in the Study of Rock Paintings from the Lower Parguaza River Basin, Bolivar State, Venezuela. Arts 2025, 14, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts14030051

AMA Style

Tarble de Scaramelli K, Scaramelli F. Predation, Propitiation and Performance: Ethnographic Analogy in the Study of Rock Paintings from the Lower Parguaza River Basin, Bolivar State, Venezuela. Arts. 2025; 14(3):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts14030051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tarble de Scaramelli, Kay, and Franz Scaramelli. 2025. "Predation, Propitiation and Performance: Ethnographic Analogy in the Study of Rock Paintings from the Lower Parguaza River Basin, Bolivar State, Venezuela" Arts 14, no. 3: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts14030051

APA Style

Tarble de Scaramelli, K., & Scaramelli, F. (2025). Predation, Propitiation and Performance: Ethnographic Analogy in the Study of Rock Paintings from the Lower Parguaza River Basin, Bolivar State, Venezuela. Arts, 14(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts14030051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop