Next Article in Journal
BIM4Ren: Barriers to BIM Implementation in Renovation Processes in the Italian Market
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of the Optimal Order of Grey-Box Models for Short-Time Prediction of Buildings’ Thermal Behavior
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Rise of Office Design in High-Performance, Open-Plan Environments
Open AccessArticle

Differences in Occupants’ Satisfaction and Perceived Productivity in High- and Low-Performance Offices

1
Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
2
School of Architecture, Faculty of Design Architecture and Building, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
3
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Beykoz University, Istanbul 34805, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2019, 9(9), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9090199
Received: 5 July 2019 / Revised: 17 August 2019 / Accepted: 26 August 2019 / Published: 30 August 2019
This paper reports the results from a dataset comprising 9794 post-occupancy evaluation (POE) surveys from 77 Australian open-plan offices. This paper specifically focuses on a sub-set of 20 offices (n = 2133), identified from ranking 10 offices each, with the least (n = 1063) and highest (n = 1070) satisfaction scores, respectively. The satisfaction scores were evaluated on the basis of seven factors (i.e., building/office aesthetics and quality, thermal comfort and indoor air quality, noise distraction and privacy, personal control, connection to outdoor environment, maintenance and visual comfort, and individual space). Using the POE survey data from 20 offices, regression analyses and two-way ANOVA tests were carried out to understand the differences in occupants’ satisfaction and perceived productivity arising from open-plan offices. According to the statistically significant regression analyses results, it was identified that building/office aesthetics and quality (β = 0.55, p < 0.001) and noise distraction and privacy (β = 0.33, p < 0.001) were the two strongest predictors contributing perceived productivity in low-performance offices. Two-way ANOVA test results for the 10 high-performance offices indicate that the perceived productivity was strongly associated with the office’s physical configuration, the employees’ working experience, and the working hours at that office. View Full-Text
Keywords: indoor environmental quality; open-plan offices; user satisfaction; perceived productivity; office design; post-occupancy evaluation indoor environmental quality; open-plan offices; user satisfaction; perceived productivity; office design; post-occupancy evaluation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Göçer, Ö.; Candido, C.; Thomas, L.; Göçer, K. Differences in Occupants’ Satisfaction and Perceived Productivity in High- and Low-Performance Offices. Buildings 2019, 9, 199.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop