Parametric Creative Design of Building Free-Forms Roofed with Transformed Shells Introducing Architect’s and Civil Engineer’s Responsible Artistic Concepts
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The Authors have performed an excellent job. They considered how I had commented their article and suitably addressed all my comments. Not only did they carefully and correctly addressed the issues raised in my review, but also they blended my suggestions or criticisms and further personal developments or contributions, which have further enriched the article.
Now, the article really adds to the subject and the presentation saves the readers’ effort to understand the message that the article aims at conveying.
Thus, I strongly recommend that the revised version of the article that has been resubmitted is accepted and published in the present form.
Author Response
Thank you for the sets of critical reviews and comments for technical improvement of this manuscript. I am grateful for the positive review of my fairly tough article.
Reviewer 2 Report
Very good work.
I believe that the conclusions should be summarised more clearly.
I miss more references, including from MDPI.
Author Response
Thank you for the sets of critical reviews and comments for technical improvement of this manuscript. The summary of my specific response is as follows. I try to take account of the suggestions. Following the reviewer’s suggestions, I changed the conclusions of the manuscript to make them more clearly. The references, including from MDPI, were completed.
