Next Article in Journal
Triaxial Response and Elastoplastic Constitutive Model for Artificially Cemented Granular Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Measurement Methods for Moisture Content Inside Wood
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Palazzo Farnese and Dong’s Fortified Compound: An Art-Anthropological Cross-Cultural Analysis of Architectural Form, Symbolic Ornamentation, and Public Perception

1
School of Art & Design, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi’an 710021, China
2
Xi’an Zhongda Shiye Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710065, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(15), 2720; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152720 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 July 2025 / Revised: 19 July 2025 / Accepted: 26 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate)

Abstract

This study presents a cross-cultural comparison of two fortified residences—Palazzo Farnese in Italy and Dong’s Fortified Compound in China—through a triadic analytical framework encompassing architectural form, symbolic ornamentation, and public perception. By combining field observation, iconographic interpretation, and digital ethnography, the research investigates how heritage meaning is constructed, encoded, and reinterpreted across distinct sociocultural contexts. Empirical materials include architectural documentation, decorative analysis, and a curated dataset of 4947 user-generated images and 1467 textual comments collected from Chinese and international platforms between 2020 and 2024. Methods such as CLIP-based visual clustering and BERTopic-enabled sentiment modelling were applied to extract patterns of perception and symbolic emphasis. The findings reveal contrasting representational logics: Palazzo Farnese encodes dynastic authority and Renaissance cosmology through geometric order and immersive frescoes, while Dong’s Compound conveys Confucian ethics and frontier identity via nested courtyards and traditional ornamentation. Digital responses diverge accordingly: international users highlight formal aesthetics and photogenic elements; Chinese users engage with symbolic motifs, family memory, and ritual significance. This study illustrates how historically fortified residences are reinterpreted through culturally specific digital practices, offering an interdisciplinary approach that bridges architectural history, symbolic analysis, and digital heritage studies.
Keywords: fortified residences; architectural form; symbolic ornamentation; public perception; digital ethnography; art anthropology; Dong’s Fortified Compound; Palazzo Farnese fortified residences; architectural form; symbolic ornamentation; public perception; digital ethnography; art anthropology; Dong’s Fortified Compound; Palazzo Farnese

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, L.; Zhan, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, C. Palazzo Farnese and Dong’s Fortified Compound: An Art-Anthropological Cross-Cultural Analysis of Architectural Form, Symbolic Ornamentation, and Public Perception. Buildings 2025, 15, 2720. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152720

AMA Style

Wu L, Zhan Q, Li Y, Chen C. Palazzo Farnese and Dong’s Fortified Compound: An Art-Anthropological Cross-Cultural Analysis of Architectural Form, Symbolic Ornamentation, and Public Perception. Buildings. 2025; 15(15):2720. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Liyue, Qinchuan Zhan, Yanjun Li, and Chen Chen. 2025. "Palazzo Farnese and Dong’s Fortified Compound: An Art-Anthropological Cross-Cultural Analysis of Architectural Form, Symbolic Ornamentation, and Public Perception" Buildings 15, no. 15: 2720. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152720

APA Style

Wu, L., Zhan, Q., Li, Y., & Chen, C. (2025). Palazzo Farnese and Dong’s Fortified Compound: An Art-Anthropological Cross-Cultural Analysis of Architectural Form, Symbolic Ornamentation, and Public Perception. Buildings, 15(15), 2720. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15152720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop