Next Article in Journal
Design and Construction Control of Warm Mix Epoxy Asphalt Mixture with Low Epoxy Content for Service Area Pavements
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Big Data Adoption for Sustainability in the Swedish Construction Industry: Technical, Economic, and Organizational Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heat Risk Assessment in Arid Zones Based on Local Climate Zones: A Case of Urumqi, China

1
School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China
2
College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(10), 1672; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101672
Submission received: 13 April 2025 / Revised: 9 May 2025 / Accepted: 13 May 2025 / Published: 15 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate)

Abstract

Based on the rapid development of urbanization and the increasing severity of extreme heat disasters caused by global warming, it has become increasingly important to enhance the assessment of heat risk. In this study, in response to the urgent need for fine-grained assessment of urban heat risk in arid zones in the context of climate change, an analytical method of dividing Local Climate Zones (LCZs) into street blocks combined with the Hazard–Exposure–Vulnerability–Adaptability (HEVA) heat risk assessment framework is used in Urumqi, a representative city of China’s arid zones. In addition, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) was introduced to quantitatively resolve the driving mechanisms of heat risk in different types of LCZs. The results show that the study area has the largest proportion of bare soil (LCZ F) (37.6%), which is distributed around the built-up types of LCZs, while water (LCZ G) has a very small proportion (0.39%) and only exists in the outskirts of the city. Heat risk was significantly higher in the urban core than in the peri-urban areas, but LCZ F had a very high hazard due to the unique surface characteristics of arid zones, which elevated the heat risk in the peri-urban desertification fringe; SHAP analyses demonstrated that in arid zones, land surface temperature (LST) became a determinant of heat risk for all low-density built-up types of LCZs. This study proposes targeted mitigation strategies for heat risk in arid zones based on the LCZ framework.

1. Introduction

Global urbanization continues to accelerate. By 2050, the proportion of the world’s population living in cities and towns is projected to reach 68%, with most of the growth occurring in developing countries [1]. Urban expansion has triggered the transformation of large-scale natural surfaces into artificial ones, exacerbating the urban heat island effect [2], which has led to an upward trend in the frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme heat events [3], and the deterioration of the heat environment not only threatens the health of the population (e.g., heat stress, increased risk of cardiorespiratory diseases) [4] but also has a serious socio-economic impact by reducing labor productivity and increasing energy consumption [5]. Under this double pressure, heat risk has become the focus of research worldwide [6], and the construction of a refined heat risk assessment system has become a scientific prerequisite for the development of climate resilience planning.
Current research on heat risk has been established in cities in humid climate zones (Köppen–Geiger climate classification as A-, C-, or D-type), involving a wide range of developed and developing countries in Europe [7,8,9,10,11], the Americas [12,13,14,15], and Asia [16,17,18]. The studies in the humid climate zones clearly reflect an iterative relationship, with the post-2020 studies [8,10,11,13,16,17,18] adopting more evaluation metrics, more interpretable and quantitative modeling, and more accurate risk identification than the earlier studies (pre-2020) [7,9,12,14,15]. However, research involving cities in arid climatic zones (Köppen–Geiger climate classification as B-type), which cover 30.2% of the world’s area [19], is limited, the system is not yet robust [20], and coping strategies fail to target specific cities and populations, i.e., there is a lack of granularity in the attention given to particular environmental topics [21]. In addition, such studies have focused on macro and regional scales, making it difficult to capture intra-regional heterogeneity in thermal environments. Heat risk research within the last two years has proposed a neighborhood-scale analysis paradigm, and studies in Cardiff [8], Changzhou [16], and Delhi [18] have begun to explore the correlation between heat risk and the domain of local climate. This is due to the homogeneity of buildings within the same neighborhood, which can be considered as a separate thermal zone [22]. Considering the relationship with the thermal environment on a neighborhood scale is more rational [23] and helps to link the results of risk assessments to fine-grained specific urban planning measures [16].
Local Climate Zones (LCZs) are between the urban and neighborhood scales; they can well describe and classify different urban environments [24], and can work with multi-scale urban planning [25]. One of the mapping methods is usually based on the city’s main roads or rivers, and the segmentation scale is relatively detailed, which can well address the heterogeneity of the urban surface [26], and is considered an ideal framework for studying the relationship between urban morphology and the distribution of various indicators [27]. The system deconstructs urban space into 17 types of climate-responsive units by standardizing built-up environment morphological parameters (building height/density, etc.) and surface cover characteristics (Figure 1), which establishes a physical basis for refined heat risk assessment [28]. Compared with traditional methods for studying the urban thermal environment, LCZ’s fine-grained depiction of heterogeneous structures and indicators within the city is more conducive to standardized descriptions across disciplines [29]. Current LCZ mapping methods mainly include RS-based methods and GIS-based methods, with RS-based mapping methods being the most numerous, accounting for the majority of studies (64.86%) [30]. However, this method has low resolution and weak visualization effect [31], with a verified accuracy of only 50–60% [32]. GIS-based methods can achieve higher accuracy, but need to rely on complete and detailed urban spatial data [33]. Some studies have combined the advantages of the two methods [34,35], firstly using RS-based methods to distinguish land cover types for initial classification, and subsequently combining architectural and geographic information from GIS methods to improve the accuracy of LCZ zoning. Although LCZ studies have covered more than 200 cities around the world, there is still a large gap in areas under extreme climate effects compared to economically developed cities. Therefore, increasing research on these regions will enrich the applicability of LCZs [30].
Furthermore, in order to develop response strategies for heat risk, it is necessary to go beyond the limitations of traditional metrics, such as single urban heat island (UHI) measurements or land surface temperature (LST) analyses. While these metrics are effective in quantifying temperature intensity and spatial patterns, they usually provide only partial insights [36] and do not capture the interaction of a wide range of factors such as land use, vegetation cover, and urban sprawl [37]. Therefore, the choice of a comprehensive assessment system in risk assessment is particularly important [38]. In terms of assessment frameworks, the representative Clayton risk triangle system based on the composition of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability proposed by the IPCC is widely used [39,40,41]. There is also the HVI thermal vulnerability evaluation system composed of exposure, vulnerability, and adaptability [42,43]. On this basis, Chinese scholars Wu et al. proposed the HEVA risk assessment framework based on Hazard–Exposure–Vulnerability–Adaptability to improve the accuracy of heat risk mapping [44] and form a more complete heat risk assessment framework, which has been successively used in heat risk assessment research [45,46,47].
In this study, we take the central urban area of Urumqi in the arid zone of China as an example, draw high-precision LCZ maps based on the method of combining RS and GIS, and construct the HEVA heat risk assessment system to determine the distribution pattern of heat risk of each LCZ type at the neighborhood scale. Moreover, the causes of heat risk are resolved by calculating the contribution of SHAP features. This paper aims to discuss the following:
  • What is the distribution relationship between urban heat risk and LCZ types in arid zones?
  • The heterogeneity of LCZ zoning in heat risk in arid zones.
  • Strategy planning based on LCZ zoning in arid zones.
The subsequent part of the paper is structured as follows: Section 2 describes the steps for the division of the LCZ map and the construction of the HEVA system. Section 3 carries out the assessment of heat risk based on the system established in the previous section. Section 4 demonstrates the spatial differentiation patterns, drivers, and strategies proposed for heat risk in arid regions. Section 5 summarizes the study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Urumqi (86°48′ E–88°58′ E, 42°45′ N–45°00′ N) is located in the northern foothills of the Tianshan Mountains in the arid region of northwestern China, in the hinterland of the Asia–Europe continent. It is the capital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and the core city of the Silk Road Economic Belt, as well as a typical representative of oasis cities in arid regions [48]. The study area has a typical temperate continental arid climate [49]; its Köppen–Geiger climate classification is Bsk-type, with cold winters and hot summers. The urban water source mainly relies on glacial snowmelt and groundwater [50], with an average annual precipitation of less than 300 mm, evaporation of up to 2000 mm or more, and a significant temperature difference between day and night. The topography is high in the north and low in the south, with an altitude of 680–920 m above sea level and a bare soil coverage rate of 37.6%. The ecological environment shows a pattern of oasis–desert interlaced distribution. The city of Urumqi consists of seven districts, namely Tianshan, Saybagh, Xinshi, Shuimogou, Toutunhe, Dabancheng, and Midong, as well as Urumqi County. Among them, Tianshan District and Saybagh are political, economic, cultural, and financial centers; Xinshi District is a high-tech industrial development zone; and Midong District is an industrial park [51]. As of 2023, the city has a resident population of 4,084,800, with an urbanization rate of 96.56%, the second highest in China (Urumqi Municipal People’s Government, 2024). The ultra-high urbanization rate responds to the concentration of population and resources in a special geographical environment. In addition, heavy industries such as chemical plants and non-ferrous metal smelting are densely distributed in Urumqi [52]. As a result, the urban expansion and industrialization process lead to significant heterogeneity of the thermal properties of the subsurface.
This study takes the main urban area within the Urumqi Bypass as the study area (Figure 2), covering the core administrative units of the Xinshi District, Saybagh District, and Tianshan District. The area is rich in natural and artificial subsurfaces such as high-density built-up areas (LCZs 1–3), industrial zones (LCZ 8 and LCZ 10), and natural bare soil (LCZ F), and has typical urban characteristics of arid zones, which makes it an ideal site for the study of urban heat risk distribution in arid zones.

2.2. Research Methodology

This study can be divided into the following 4 steps (Figure 3). Firstly, a high-precision LCZ map of Urumqi was drawn by combining RS and GIS, and then a heat risk map was drawn based on the HEVA system. Secondly, the two are coupled to form the heat risk map of Urumqi under the LCZ framework, presenting the heat risk distribution pattern at the neighborhood scale and further quantifying the characteristics of heat risk share of different types of LCZs. Finally, SHAP is introduced to analyze the key driving factors of heat risk in different LCZ types and their action mechanisms.

2.2.1. LCZ Mapping

In this study, the LCZ map is drawn using the road network as the basic unit and the scene-based classification method. Firstly, road data were obtained from the OpenStreetMap website to construct the basic road network structure. Sentinel-2 L2A data were obtained from the Google Earth Engine website, and the Sentinel-2 images were segmented according to the road network to obtain irregularly mapped parcels of appropriate size and processed with image normalization to a regular size of 320*320 m to match the image blocks of the training dataset. Subsequently, the ConvNeXt model was used to train the localized samples, and 20% of the samples were selected for testing and evaluating, optimizing, and adjusting the performance of the model. For LCZ types that are not very accurate for prediction, the LCZ classification results were optimized using average height (AH) and normalized difference built-up index data (NDBI).

2.2.2. Heat Risk System Selection

Currently, most of the research systems on heat risk are HEV [7,16,40,53,54,55] and HVI [15,56] (Table 1). In this study, we chose the HEVA system, which is a new system extended from the above two traditional heat risk assessment systems. Compared with HEV, which focuses on environmental exposure, and HVI, which focuses on social vulnerability, HEVA quantifies heat risk in a more comprehensive and systematic way by combining the two and using four dimensions of risk indicators: hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and adaptability.

2.2.3. Data Sources and Standardization of Secondary Indicators

In the HEVA system, hazard reflects the degree of danger triggered by its own attributes in a natural disaster [45]; exposure reflects the activities of the population exposed to the risk and the function of the city [58]; vulnerability reflects the sensitivity of the population affected by the disaster to the harm [54]; and adaptability reflects the ability of an individual or a region to cope with extreme heat [59]. In order to accurately identify heat risk drivers and construct a spatial assessment model [60], this study determined an assessment system of 11 secondary indicators under 4 dimensions (Table 2), with reference to the mechanism of heat environment in arid cities and the data advantages of economically developed cities. The spatialization of each indicator follows the principle of matching data types and algorithms.
The sources and magnitudes of the indicators are vastly different, and in order to ensure the validity of the assessment results at the neighborhood scale, all the data were first standardized to a resolution of 30 m × 30 m, and then the data were normalized using the method of polar deviation.
For the positive indicators (hazard, exposure, and vulnerability), the formula is as follows:
x i j = x i j min ( x j ) max ( x j ) min ( x j )
For the negative indicator (adaptability), the formula is as follows:
x i j = max ( x j ) x i j max ( x j ) min ( x j )
where x i j is the value of the jth indicator in the ith sample after standardization, x i j is the original value of the jth indicator in the ith sample, and max ( x j ) and min ( x j ) are the maximum and minimum values of the jth indicator, respectively.

2.2.4. Improved CRITIC Assignment Methodology

In analyzing the importance of heat risk indicators, most of the existing studies use equal weight summation or PCA (Table 1). However, analyzing the characteristics of the indicators reveals that the primary indicators of heat risk have different degrees of influence on the composite risk, and therefore, the weights of the indicators need to be quantified. The improved CRITIC method is a further improvement on the basis of the entropy weight method, the core of which is to consider the variability and conflict between indicators, calculate the comparative strength and relevance of the same indicators under different scenarios, and then calculate the amount of information contained in each indicator [57]. In view of this, this optimization method is selected as the weight determination tool in this study, and the specific implementation process is as follows:
  • Calculation of contrast: The standard deviation is used in the CRITIC method as a mathematical representation of the degree of data dispersion within an indicator. According to the principle of statistics, the standard deviation, as an absolute measure of dispersion, is positively correlated with the fluctuation amplitude of the indicator data set: the standard deviation s j represents the contrast of the jth indicator, and an increase in the value of s j indicates that the heterogeneity of the distribution of the sample values of the jth indicator has increased significantly, and its information-carrying capacity and evaluation strength have also been increased. Based on the framework of information entropy theory, such indicators with high dispersion need to be given higher weights in the comprehensive evaluation process to accurately reflect their differentiated characteristics. The quantitative formula for indicator contrast can be expressed as follows:
    s j = i = 1 n x i j x j ¯ 2 n 1
    where x i j denotes the data normalized to the jth indicator value for the ith sample, and x j ¯ denotes the mean of the data normalized to the jth indicator value.
  • Calculation of conflictivity: this study defines conflictivity as a quantitative characterization of the degree of information redundancy between indicators. When two indicators show significant positive correlation, i.e., the value of conflictivity c j is small, it indicates that the information overlap between them is high, and their independence characteristics are subsequently decayed. This phenomenon will lead to highly correlated indicator groups forming information redundancy, weakening the marginal contribution of individual indicators in the comprehensive evaluation. Therefore, it is necessary to moderately reduce the weight proportion of such indicators in the weight allocation process to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio of the evaluation system. The conflicting c j formula is as follows:
    c j = i = 1 n 1 r i j
    where r i j indicates the correlation coefficient between indicator i and indicator j. The larger the conflictivity c j , the higher the indicator independence.
  • Calculation of information carrying capacity: synthesize contrast and conflict to calculate the amount of indicator information:
    I j = s j c j
    Determine the weight according to the proportion of information; the greater the information carrying capacity, the greater the weight. Set the weight of the first indicator as w j :
    w j = I j j = 1 n I j
According to the above calculation process, the final results of the weights of the indicators in this study were obtained (Table 3):

2.2.5. Establishment of a Heat Risk Assessment System

In this study, the composite index method is used to calculate the composite evaluation index of each primary indicator of heat risk by cumulatively multiplying the indicator values with the weights derived in the previous section. On the basis of the standardized indicator data, the comprehensive evaluation index of primary indicators is generated by weighted superposition layer by layer with the following formula:
F k = j = 1 p w j X k j
where F k is the composite assessment value of the primary indicators of the kth spatial unit, w j denotes the weight of the jth secondary indicator, and X k j is the standardized value of the jth indicator of the kth unit. The model objectively reflects the differential impact of each indicator on heat risk through a linear combination of weights and standardized values.
Considering the interaction mechanism of the four-dimensional indicators of hazard ( H ), exposure ( E ), vulnerability ( V ), and adaptability ( A ), the formula of heat risk index ( H R I ) was constructed [46]:
H R I = H × E × V A

3. Results

3.1. Description of the LCZ Map of Urumqi

In this study, a machine learning method was used to construct a spatial distribution model of LCZs in the study area. According to the Stewart and Oke classification system [28], the study area was classified into 17 LCZ types. Among them, built-up types (LCZs 1–10) accounted for 30.35%, and land-cover types (LCZs A–G) accounted for 69.65%. The built-up areas in the study area showed a central development pattern, while the land-cover types wrapped the built-up areas in a ring shape to form a core–edge distribution structure.
Spatial statistical analysis shows that among the built-up types, LCZ 5 (open mid-rise buildings) accounts for the highest proportion of 20.1% (Figure 4b), and its spatial distribution has obvious spatial clustering with that of LCZ 2 (compact mid-rise buildings), which is mainly located in the urban core area constituted by the northwestern part of Tianshan District, northeastern part of Saybagh District, southern part of Xinshi District, and the western part of Shuimogou District, and is sporadically located in the central part of Midong District. LCZ 1 (compact high-rise buildings) accounts for only 2.2% (Figure 4b), and is distributed in the economic center of Tianshan District, such as the Democracy Road–Hongqi Road business circle. The spatial differentiation of industrial land is also significant: LCZ 8 (large low-rise buildings) and LCZ 10 (lightweight low-rise buildings) form a cluster in the matrix of LCZ F, which is mainly distributed in the southern part of the Toutunhe District and the central part of the Midong District, reflecting the distribution characteristics of the arid zone in which the industrial land is intertwined with bare land.
The land-cover types of LCZs show typical arid zone surface characteristics: LCZ F accounts for 53.9% of the total land-cover types (Figure 4c), which is also the highest among all LCZs, accounting for 37.6% of the total study area (Figure 4a) and forming a semi-annular distribution along the northeast–southeast–southwest of the built-up area; LCZ D (low plants) accounts for 32.9% of the total land-cover types and is mainly located in the agricultural cultivation area in the northwest of the city, and within it, rural settlement types such as LCZ 3 (compact low-rise buildings) and LCZ 6 (open low-rise buildings) are distributed. LCZ G (water) accounted for the lowest share of only 0.56% of the land-cover types (Figure 4c), and 0.39% of the total area of the study area (Figure 4a), which reflected the typical characteristic of the arid zone of water resource scarcity.

3.2. Heat Risk Assessment Map of Urumqi

According to the heat risk map (Figure 5), the heat risk value in Urumqi city ranges from 0.26 to 0.69, with high-risk areas distributed in high-density built-up areas in the southern part of the Xinshi District, the northeastern part of Saybagh District, the western part of Shuimogou District, and the northwestern part of Tianshan District. These areas have high building density and frequent population activities, resulting in high exposure and vulnerability and high heat risk. In addition, Midong District in northeastern Urumqi is the next highest heat risk area, with a large number of factories and heavy industrial areas, industrial heat emissions, and large areas of bare soil making this area relatively high in hazard and exposure. In contrast, areas of low heat risk are concentrated in the northwest of the city. This part of the city has a low density of buildings, low levels of human activity, and extensive vegetated spaces that effectively reduce surface heat radiation, making this area also at a lower level of risk than the rest of the city.

3.3. LCZ-Based Heat Risk Analysis

3.3.1. LCZ-Based Spatial Heterogeneity of Heat Risk

Under the LCZ framework, heat risk in Urumqi showed significant spatial differentiation characteristics (Figure 6a). The statistical results show (Figure 6b,c) that the heat risk of the built-up types LCZs is generally higher than that of the land-cover types LCZs. Among them, the median value of the heat risk index of the high-density built-up types LCZ 1 and LCZ 2 both exceed 0.5, which is the highest level in the city, and their high exposure and vulnerability are the main driving factors. Compact medium-high-rise (LCZ 1 and LCZ 2) has a higher heat risk than open medium-high-rise (LCZ 4 and LCZ 5). The relatively high heat risk of industrial types LCZ 8 and LCZ 10 may be due to the combined effect of high rates of surface hardening, anthropogenic heat emissions, and low vegetation cover in industrial zones. Low-density built-up types LCZ 6 and LCZ 9 have the lowest mean value of heat risk, mainly due to their sparse population with building shading effect. Among the land-cover types, LCZ F has a higher heat risk and accounts for the largest proportion of the land-cover types in LCZs, which indicates that desertification fringe areas in arid cities are more susceptible to the superposition of the risks of bare soil areas and built-up areas, and more attention should be paid to the prevention and control of risks in this area. The median value of the heat risk of LCZ D and LCZ G is lower than 0.4, as their ecological regulation capacity effectively mitigates the heat risk.
It is worth noting that LCZ A (dense trees) is constrained by the climatic characteristics of arid zones, where its presence is mostly due to artificial cultivation and therefore concentrated in built-up areas; therefore, exposure and vulnerability are higher due to factors such as population density. In this case, the cooling potential of LCZ A cannot be characterized.

3.3.2. Spatial Heterogeneity of LCZ-Based Primary Indicators

The distribution of hazard (Figure 7a) shows significant spatial heterogeneity, with a range of values from 0 to 1, and the proportions of each risk level are as follows: very low risk (9.66%), low risk (15.75%), medium risk (25.33%), high risk (28.10%), and very high risk (21.16%) (Figure 7b). Unlike the humid city, the high-risk areas in Urumqi are mainly located in the peripheral LCZ F rather than in the high-density built-up areas, and the proportion of “very high” risk in LCZ F is more than 40%, which is directly related to the intensity of thermal radiation and the wide distribution of bare soil. Among the built-up areas, LCZ 7, LCZ 8, and LCZ 10 have significantly higher heat hazards than LCZs 1–3 (high-density buildings) due to the high rate of hardening of the surface and low vegetation cover in the industrial areas, whereas the high-density residential areas mitigate the buildup of thermal radiation through building shade and localized greening [61]. The “very low” risk area is concentrated in the northwestern part of the city in the LCZ D cropping area, confirming the cooling effect of vegetation transpiration.
The spatial variation of exposure (Figure 7c) is highly coupled with the intensity of human activities. The overall exposure was high at the core and low at the edge, with “very high” and “high” exposures concentrated in the southern part of the Xinshi District and the northeastern part of the Saybagh District, etc. The proportion of “very high” and “high” exposures in LCZ 1 and LCZ 2 exceeds 80% (Figure 7d), and the proportion of high exposures in LCZs 3–5 exceeds 20% due to the combination of commercial and residential functions. It is worth noting that LCZ A has a particularly high percentage of high exposure among land-cover types, which is due to the fact that plantation forests in arid zones are mostly adjacent to built-up areas and have a high degree of spatial overlap with urban functions.
There is a more pronounced spatial correlation between the distribution pattern of vulnerability (Figure 7e) and exposure. The high-risk zones (3.39% of the total) are also concentrated in the LCZ 1 and LCZ 2 area. Sporadic distribution of vulnerability highs occurs in the education concentration zones in the southern part of Tianshan District (including the southern campus of Xinjiang University, primary and secondary schools, and the University for the Elderly, etc.), in the industrial parks in the south-central part of the Toutunhe District, and in the southern part of the Midong District, in the Midong Petrochemical Zone. The education zone is densely populated by sensitive people, and the industrial park and Midong Petrochemical Zone are subject to the enhancement of surface radiation by heat generation from factories and bare soil. Building year, as a negative indicator, shows a vulnerability amplification effect in LCZ 3 (mostly old neighborhoods).
Adaptability (Figure 7g) acts as a negative indicator to counteract heat risk. The “very high” adaptability (2.70%) is concentrated in the core areas of the old city, such as Saybagh District and Tianshan District, where the dense distribution of healthcare and heat evacuation sites is the main driving factor. Correspondingly, the high-GDP Xinshi District, which has been developed for a shorter period of time, has a lower level of healthcare and other infrastructure coverage than the old city, resulting in a southward shift of high adaptability values compared to high exposure and vulnerability values. Similarly, the heavy industrial zone in Midong District (LCZ 8 and LCZ 10) is densely populated but has a severe shortage of public service facilities, making it less resilient. LCZ E (bare rock or paved) is significantly more resilient than the other land-cover types due to the interspersing of functional spaces such as transport hubs and commercial centers.

4. Discussion

4.1. Heat Risk Heterogeneity in Arid Zones Under LCZ Framework

For the built-up types (Table 4), established studies confirm the high risk of LCZ 2 and LCZ 5 [62]; the study on Karachi demonstrates that LCZ 2 and LCZ 3 exhibit the highest heat risk due to high population and building density [53]; the study on Kabul, also an arid city, shows that large areas of impervious surfaces, low-rise buildings, and concrete and steel structures make LCZ 8 the highest LST and Surface Urban Heat Island (SUHI) value zones [63]; Phoenix and Las Vegas had the same findings [20]; the study on 50 cities demonstrated that high-density types (LCZs 1–3) and industrial types (LCZ 8 and LCZ 10) generally have stronger SUHI intensities than open types (LCZs 4–6), with LCZ 9 having the lowest SUHI intensity [64]; the mean heat risk was highest in LCZ 3 and lowest in LCZ 9 for the built-up types in Cardiff [8]; in the case of Changzhou, LCZ 1 had the highest heat risk and LCZ 9 the lowest, and LCZs 1–5 with high-density populations were overall higher than the other built-up types [16]; the study in Harbin showed the highest proportions of LCZ 2 and LCZ 3 in the high risk, again validating that compact LCZs have a greater risk of causing disasters [65].
Regarding the land-cover types of LCZs (Table 5), LCZ E was the highest heat risk type in Karachi, Phoenix, and Changzhou, while the study of Kabul, an arid zone city, claimed that LCZ F behaved as the highest risk zone among the land-cover types on different dates. This is usually due to the fact that bare soil or sand surfaces can easily absorb and re-emit solar radiation [63]; this finding is consistent with the results for Las Vegas, 50 cities, Cardiff, Changzhou, and Harbin. LCZ G was the lowest-risk land-cover type in the vast majority of the studies, with the exception of Kabul (where LCZ B had the lowest risk, followed by LCZ G). LCZ G had the lowest risk during the daytime in the 50 cities study, but LCZ D had the lowest performance in terms of daily risk due to the nighttime temperature rebound effect.
In conclusion, comparing the typical urban cases around the world, there are significant differences in the heat risk of different LCZ types due to the characteristics of built-up areas, population density, and economic activities in different cities. The present study shows that compact built-up types (LCZs 1–3) have higher heat risk than open built-up types (LCZs 4–6), which is in line with the results of studies in humid climate zones [8,66]. The pattern of performance of land-cover types LCZs, on the other hand, differs somewhat from studies in other regions. Although LCZ G exhibits a cooling effect globally [20,67,68], the extent of its influence in arid cities is diminished by the small size of the water bodies, making it difficult to create regional climate regulation. Meanwhile, the widely distributed bare soil zone (LCZ F) at the edge of arid cities has a higher heat risk, and the urban desertification fringe should be more concerned about the built-up heat environment and the dynamic enhancement of the natural climate environment. Overall, the more concentrated heat risk values for all 17 LCZ types in this study compared to the wet zone [8,16,46] suggest that different urban form factors tend to homogenize under the effect of significant climatic conditions in arid zones. This phenomenon has not been fully demonstrated in the current LCZ-based risk assessment.

4.2. Neighborhood-Scale Coping Strategies for Heat Risk in Arid Zones

4.2.1. SHAP-Based Analysis of Indicator Contributions

Based on the previous block-scale assessment of heat risk in arid zones under the LCZ framework, SHAP analysis is applied to reveal the driving mechanisms of heat risk in different LCZ types and to propose differentiated coping strategies. In order to assess the contribution characteristics of the indicator system, it is necessary to first ensure the independence between the variables. In this study, the variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to diagnose multicollinearity among independent variables. VIF is the ratio of the variance in the presence of multicollinearity among explanatory variables to the variance in the absence of multicollinearity [69] and is calculated using the following formula:
V I F i = 1 1 R i 2
where R i 2 is the coefficient of determination when regressing the ith independent variable on all other independent variables. The larger the VIF value, the stronger the covariance of the variable with the other variables (the usual threshold is 10.0, which corresponds to a tolerance of 0.10) [70]. Based on the results of the multiple-covariance test (Table 6), the final seven indicators with VIF ≤ 10 were filtered to be LST, Population Density, Year of Construction, Housing Value, High-temperature Shelter, Medical Facilities, and GDP.
To explain the contribution of individual metrics to heat risk, this study invokes SHAP as an interpretable model. The SHAP value is derived from the Shapley value in the cooperative game theory, which solves the inconsistency problem of the traditional feature significance approach by equitably distributing the contribution of features to the model prediction [71]. The SHAP analysis demonstrates the key drivers of heat risk and their contribution for different LCZ types (Figure 8): LCZ 1 and LCZ 2 have the highest contribution of healthcare resource distribution to heat risk, suggesting that healthcare resource coverage plays an important role in mitigating heat risk in a high-density built-up area. Population density is the main driver of heat risk in LCZ 3, with a decrease in per capita resource availability (e.g., medical facilities) elevating risk. In contrast, the heat risk of LCZ 4 and LCZs 6–10, which have relatively low building densities, is primarily driven by LST. LCZ 9, in particular, has a significantly amplified contribution from LST due to its high degree of integration with the natural ground surface, and the enhancing effect of bare soil cover on thermal radiation is particularly prominent in this area. While LCZ 6, LCZ 7, and LCZ 10 show similar trends, LCZ 9 exhibits absolute dominance of LST due to the lowest building density.

4.2.2. Strategy Response

Combined with the results of SHAP analysis, the strategic response is proposed (Figure 9): additional smart medical emergency stations are installed in high-population-density neighborhoods (LCZ 1 and LCZ 2), such as Minzhu Road and Hongshan Business District, equipped with emergency cooling devices, and prioritized to cover neighborhoods with high heat risk. In addition, for LCZ 8 and LCZ 10, such as Midong Industrial Zone, the solution would be laying heat storage floor tiles, adding fogging cooling devices, and combining vegetation barriers to achieve surface heat blockage to reduce LST. Bare soil zone management strategies are proposed for urban desertification fringes, suggesting a combination of vegetation modification and albedo modulation to transform these neglected zones into heat buffer zones. This approach may provide a more cost-effective solution for expanding arid cities. In addition, shrub cultivation supplemented with gravel mulching could be implemented in the LCZ F zone along the Jingxin Expressway to reduce surface albedo and radiation suppression while restoring the ecology. In the LCZ E block of JD’s Asia No.1 Logistics Park, permeable pavement is laid, and grass tiles are laid in the car park to improve vegetation cover and reduce surface radiation. In the logistics park, green roofs and other means are used to reduce the heat load of buildings and achieve green warehousing. At the same time, the positive role of the blue-green space LCZ D and LCZ G should be enhanced by constructing an artificial wetland along the LCZ G of the Heping Drainage Canal and extending the cooling effect of the water body to a wider area by using the recycled water recycling system. Lay out protective forest belts in the northwestern LCZ D plots of the farming area to ensure the area of blue-green space in the arid zone. In addition, at the policy level, popularize the policy control under the guidance of the LCZ framework, and implement restrictions on different development intensities for different LCZ types. Real-time control of population, buildings, and other indicators under the LCZ block unit is constructed to achieve high-precision heat risk dynamic early warning and guide urban small area development planning.

4.3. Limitations and Prospects

Based on the LCZ classification system and the HEVA heat risk assessment framework, this study reveals the spatial differentiation patterns of heat risk in typical cities in arid zones, but there is still room for improvement. Firstly, due to the limitation of spatial resolution of socio-economic data, it is difficult to accurately characterize the numerical distribution of the 30 m rasterized data obtained by spatial interpolation, and future studies should seek more accurate numerical sources. Secondly, in the process of LCZ classification, there is still a little misjudgment of the ground cover type, and the subsequent research needs to optimize the algorithm, extract the sample features in depth, and establish the exclusive classification rules for arid zones by combining with the ground survey data.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the spatial heterogeneity of heat risk at the neighborhood scale and its driving mechanism were systematically revealed by integrating LCZ zoning and HEVA assessment framework and applying SHAP analysis in a typical arid zone city of Urumqi.
It is found that the LCZ of Urumqi shows the distribution pattern of bare soil surrounding the built-up area and the typical arid zone characteristic of water scarcity. There are both core and peripheral zones of high heat risk, with the high-density built-up area in the city center becoming the core zone of heat risk due to the double agglomeration effect of population and buildings, and the bare-soil area in the outskirts of the city forming the secondary risk zone due to the strong surface radiation in arid climate, which together lead to the overall elevated level of heat risk in the study area. This result can provide local governments with a warning of the direction of climate risk and delay land development of construction types in high-risk areas in urban planning. In addition, urban desertification fringe areas can be used as a focus of dry zone strategy to guide the role point of sustainability planning strategy. It is noteworthy that LCZ D/G shows significant thermal mitigation efficacy in localized areas, verifying its importance as an ecological safety barrier for cities in arid zones. Meanwhile, the quantitative analysis based on the SHAP model further indicates that LST is the dominant factor influencing the heat risk in low-density built-up areas. This can provide a scientific basis for the construction department to revise the controlling norms in terms of building density, as well as ideas for the macro layout of, for example, urban wind corridors and thermal buffer zones. Furthermore, the LCZ in the study demonstrated its applicability in arid regions, filling the gap of the LCZ tool in extreme climate zones around the globe, and the framework of the LCZ, together with HEVA and SHAP, expands the universality of the tool in heat risk assessment and strategy response, and also enriches the completeness of the heat risk assessment system, which provides a replicable methodology for researchers in the field of heat risk across climatic zones in the international arena.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z.; methodology, J.G. and J.B.; software, H.L.; validation, J.G.; formal analysis, H.L.; investigation, H.L., H.W. and H.G.; resources, J.B.; data curation, H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, H.L., J.G. and H.Z.; visualization, H.L. and C.L.; supervision, H.Z.; project administration, H.Z.; funding acquisition, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 52108044.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

LCZLocal Climate Zone
HEVAHazard–Exposure–Vulnerability–Adaptability
HEVHazard–Exposure–Vulnerability
HVIHeat Vulnerability Index
SHAPShapley Additive Explanations
RSRemote Sensing
GISGeographic Information System
PCAPrincipal Component Analysis
EWMEntropy Weight Method
CRITICCriteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation
LSTLand Surface Temperature
AHAverage Height
SUHISurface Urban Heat Island
NDBINormalized Difference Built-up Index
NDVINormalized Difference Vegetation Index
POIPoint Of Information
VIFVariance Inflation Factor

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Oke, T.R.; Cleugh, H.A. Urban heat storage derived as energy balance residuals. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 1987, 39, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Malede, D.A.; Andualem, T.G.; Yibeltal, M.; Alamirew, T.; Kassie, A.E.; Demeke, G.G.; Mekonnen, Y.G. Climate change impacts on hydroclimatic variables over Awash basin, Ethiopia: A systematic review. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2024, 6, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vujovic, S.; Haddad, B.; Karaky, H.; Sebaibi, N.; Boutouil, M. Urban Heat Island: Causes, Consequences, and Mitigation Measures with Emphasis on Reflective and Permeable Pavements. CivilEng 2021, 2, 459–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oppermann, E.; Kjellstrom, T.; Lemke, B.; Otto, M.; Lee, J.K.W. Establishing intensifying chronic exposure to extreme heat as a slow onset event with implications for health, wellbeing, productivity, society and economy. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2021, 50, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cichowicz, R.; Bochenek, A.D. Assessing the effects of urban heat islands and air pollution on human quality of life. Anthropocene 2024, 46, 100433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tomlinson, C.J.; Chapman, L.; Thornes, J.E.; Baker, C.J. Including the urban heat island in spatial heat health risk assessment strategies: A case study for Birmingham, UK. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2011, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sharmin, T.; Chappell, A.; Lannon, S. Spatio-temporal analysis of LST, NDVI and SUHI in a coastal temperate city using local climate zone. Energy Built Environ. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ketterer, C.; Matzarakis, A. Comparison of different methods for the assessment of the urban heat island in Stuttgart, Germany. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2015, 59, 1299–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ellena, M.; Melis, G.; Zengarini, N.; Di Gangi, E.; Ricciardi, G.; Mercogliano, P.; Costa, G. Micro-scale UHI risk assessment on the heat-health nexus within cities by looking at socio-economic factors and built environment characteristics: The Turin case study (Italy). Urban Clim. 2023, 49, 101514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lopes, H.S.; Vidal, D.G.; Cherif, N.; Silva, L.; Remoaldo, P.C. Green infrastructure and its influence on urban heat island, heat risk, and air pollution: A case study of Porto (Portugal). J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 376, 124446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aubrecht, C.; Özceylan, D. Identification of heat risk patterns in the U.S. National Capital Region by integrating heat stress and related vulnerability. Environ. Int. 2013, 56, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Côté, J.-N.; Levac, E.; Germain, M.; Lavigne, E. Projected risk and vulnerability to heat waves for Montreal, Quebec, using Gaussian processes. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 116, 105907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peres, L.d.F.; Lucena, A.J.d.; Rotunno Filho, O.C.; França, J.R.d.A. The urban heat island in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in the last 30 years using remote sensing data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2018, 64, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Inostroza, L.; Palme, M.; de la Barrera, F. A Heat Vulnerability Index: Spatial Patterns of Exposure, Sensitivity and Adaptive Capacity for Santiago de Chile. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma, L.; Huang, G.; Johnson, B.A.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Yan, Z.; Zhan, W.; Lu, H.; He, W.; Lian, D. Investigating urban heat-related health risks based on local climate zones: A case study of Changzhou in China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 91, 104402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, T.; Sun, Y.; Wang, R.; Yang, Y.; Yin, L.; Li, L.; Zhang, B. A new framework for assessing and dealing with heat risk from an urban resilience perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 479, 144008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kacker, K.; Srivastava, P.; Mukherjee, M. Heat stress risk at an intra-urban level: A case study of Delhi, India. Build. Environ. 2024, 264, 111897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peel, M.C.; Finlayson, B.L.; McMahon, T.A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.; Middel, A.; Myint, S.W.; Kaplan, S.; Brazel, A.J.; Lukasczyk, J. Assessing local climate zones in arid cities: The case of Phoenix, Arizona and Las Vegas, Nevada. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2018, 141, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Lu, L.; Zhou, X.; Huang, G.; Chen, Z. Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Drivers of the Urban Heat Island Effect in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions of Northern China. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, C.; Li, Z.; Su, Y.; Zhao, Q.; He, X.; Wu, Z.; Gao, W.; Wu, Z. Impact of block morphology on urban thermal environment with the consideration of spatial heterogeneity. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 113, 105622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gros, A.; Bozonnet, E.; Inard, C.; Musy, M. Simulation tools to assess microclimate and building energy—A case study on the design of a new district. Energy Build. 2016, 114, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Larsen, L. Urban climate and adaptation strategies. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2015, 13, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kwok, Y.T.; Schoetter, R.; Lau, K.K.L.; Hidalgo, J.; Ren, C.; Pigeon, G.; Masson, V. How well does the local climate zone scheme discern the thermal environment of Toulouse (France)? An analysis using numerical simulation data. Int. J. Climatol. 2019, 39, 5292–5315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Šećerov, I.; Savić, S.; Milošević, D.; Marković, V.; Bajšanski, I. Development of an automated urban climate monitoring system in Novi Sad (Serbia). Geogr. Pannonica 2015, 19, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, R.; Wang, M.; Ren, C.; Chen, G.; Mills, G.; Ching, J. Mapping local climate zones and its applications at the global scale: A systematic review of the last decade of progress and trend. Urban Clim. 2024, 57, 102129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stewart, I.D.; Oke, T.R. Local Climate Zones for Urban Temperature Studies. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2012, 93, 1879–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, S.; Zhan, W.; Yang, J.; Liu, Z.; Huang, F.; Lai, J.; Li, J.; Hong, F.; Huang, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Urban heat island studies based on local climate zones: A systematic overview. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geogr. Sin. 2020, 75, 1860–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, H.; Bai, J.; Zhao, J.; Guo, F.; Zhu, P.; Dong, J.; Cai, J. Application and future of local climate zone system in urban climate assessment and planning—Bibliometrics and meta-analysis. Cities 2024, 150, 104999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yan, Z.; Ma, L.; He, W.; Zhou, L.; Lu, H.; Liu, G.; Huang, G. Comparing Object-Based and Pixel-Based Methods for Local Climate Zones Mapping with Multi-Source Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bechtel, B.; Alexander, P.J.; Beck, C.; Böhner, J.; Brousse, O.; Ching, J.; Demuzere, M.; Fonte, C.; Gál, T.; Hidalgo, J.; et al. Generating WUDAPT Level 0 data—Current status of production and evaluation. Urban Clim. 2019, 27, 24–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, R.; Ren, C.; Xu, Y.; Lau, K.K.-L.; Shi, Y. Mapping the local climate zones of urban areas by GIS-based and WUDAPT methods: A case study of Hong Kong. Urban Clim. 2018, 24, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gál, T.; Bechtel, B.; Unger, J. Comparison of Two Different Local Climate Zone Mapping Methods. In Proceedings of the ICUC9—9th International Conference on Urban Climate jointly with 12th Symposium on the Urban Environment, Toulouse, France, 20–24 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou, X.; Okaze, T.; Ren, C.; Cai, M.; Ishida, Y.; Mochida, A. Mapping local climate zones for a Japanese large city by an extended workflow of WUDAPT Level 0 method. Urban Clim. 2020, 33, 100660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhou, D.; Xiao, J.; Bonafoni, S.; Berger, C.; Deilami, K.; Zhou, Y.; Frolking, S.; Yao, R.; Qiao, Z.; Sobrino, J.A. Satellite Remote Sensing of Surface Urban Heat Islands: Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mohammed, A.M.S. The Heat Adaptation Priority Index (HAPI): A practical tool for urban heat risk assessment and mitigation priority. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 126, 106420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ye, J.; Yang, F. Towards multi-scale and context-specific heat health risk assessment—A systematic review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 119, 106102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. El-Zein, A.; Tonmoy, F.N. Assessment of vulnerability to climate change using a multi-criteria outranking approach with application to heat stress in Sydney. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hua, J.; Zhang, X.; Ren, C.; Shi, Y.; Lee, T.-C. Spatiotemporal assessment of extreme heat risk for high-density cities: A case study of Hong Kong from 2006 to 2016. Sustainable Cities and Society. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 64, 102507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xin, J.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Shi, Z.; Jin, C.; Xiao, X.; Xia, J.; Yang, R. Variations of Urban Thermal Risk with Local Climate Zones. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cai, Z.; Tang, Y.; Chen, K.; Han, G. Assessing the Heat Vulnerability of Different Local Climate Zones in the Old Areas of a Chinese Megacity. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, W.; McManus, P.; Duncan, E. A Raster-Based Subdividing Indicator to Map Urban Heat Vulnerability: A Case Study in Sydney, Australia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wu, X.; Liu, Q.; Liu, G.; Huang, C.; Li, H. Risk Assessment of Heat Waves: A Review. J. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2019, 21, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guo, R.; Guo, F.; Dong, J.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, R.; Zhang, H. Finer-scale urban health risk assessment based on the interaction perspective of thermal radiation, human, activity, and space. Front. Archit. Res. 2024, 13, 682–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, F.; Fan, G.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Dong, J.; Ma, H.; Li, N. Urban heat health risk inequality and its drivers based on local climate zones: A case study of Qingdao, China. Build. Environ. 2025, 275, 112827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, X.; Shen, Z.; Fan, K.; Wu, Z. Multisource data evaluation of heat risk in Shanghai. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2021, 57, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, S.; Lei, J.; Zhang, X.; Tong, Y.; Lu, D.; Fan, L.; Duan, Z. Assessment and optimization of urban spatial resilience from the perspective of life circle: A case study of Urumqi, NW China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 109, 105527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dong, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, T.; Tao, W. Phthalate esters in urban multi-media in the arid city of Urumqi, Northwest China: Sources, bio-accessibility and health risks. Urban Clim. 2025, 59, 102291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Q.; Wang, W.; Jiang, X.; Lu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J. Optimizing the reuse of reclaimed water in arid urban regions: A case study in Urumqi, Northwest China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 51, 101702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hini, G.; Eziz, M.; Wang, W.; Ili, A.; Li, X. Spatial distribution, contamination levels, sources, and potential health risk assessment of trace elements in street dusts of Urumqi city, NW China. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2020, 26, 2112–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, X.; Zhai, S.; Li, K.; Zhu, L.; Liu, S.; Shah, V.; Tai, A.P.K.; Geng, G.; Hou, X.; Mamtimin, A.; et al. Particulate matter (PM) and ozone air quality in Urumqi of Northwest China: Seasonality, trends, and sources. Atmos. Environ. 2025, 350, 121150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Baqa, M.F.; Lu, L.; Guo, H.; Song, X.; Alavipanah, S.K.; Nawaz-ul-Huda, S.; Li, Q.; Chen, F. Investigating heat-related health risks related to local climate zones using SDGSAT-1 high-resolution thermal infrared imagery in an arid megacity. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2025, 136, 104334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, S.; Sun, Q.C.; Huang, X.; Tao, Y.; Dong, C.; Das, S.; Liu, Y. Health-integrated heat risk assessment in Australian cities. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2023, 102, 107176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, Q.; Ding, M.; Yang, X.; Hu, K.; Qi, J. Spatially explicit assessment of heat health risk by using multi-sensor remote sensing images and socioeconomic data in Yangtze River Delta, China. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2018, 17, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xu, H.; Li, C.; Hu, Y.; Kong, R.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Y. Long-term temporal and spatial divergence patterns of urban heat risk in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration. Urban Clim. 2024, 56, 102085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, M.; Liu, R.; Gou, X.; Li, G.; Xu, Y. Spatial-temporal analysis and risk assessment of heat waves in the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle. Comput. Tech. Geophys. Geochem. Explor. 2022, 44, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Verdonck, M.-L.; Demuzere, M.; Hooyberghs, H.; Priem, F.; Van Coillie, F. Heat risk assessment for the Brussels capital region under different urban planning and greenhouse gas emission scenarios. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 249, 109210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rinner, C.; Dianne, P.; Kate, B.; Shiraz, N.; Stephanie, G.; Campbell, M. The Role of Maps in Neighborhood-level Heat Vulnerability Assessment for the City of Toronto. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 37, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, H.; Ma, J.; Yang, Y. Spatial heterogeneity of driving factors for urban heat health risk in Chongqing, China: A new identification method and proposal of planning response framework. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 153, 110449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, J.; Yeom, S.; Hong, T. Analyzing the cooling effect, thermal comfort, and energy consumption of integrated arrangement of high-rise buildings and green spaces on urban heat island. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 119, 106105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Savić, S.; Marković, V.; Šećerov, I.; Pavić, D.; Arsenović, D.; Milošević, D.; Dolinaj, D.; Nagy, I.; Pantelić, M. Heat wave risk assessment and mapping in urban areas: Case study for a midsized Central European city, Novi Sad (Serbia). Nat. Hazards 2018, 91, 891–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Akbari, F.A.; Sharifi, A. Examining the suitability of the local climate zones (LCZ) framework in informal urban settlements: Insights from Kabul, Afghanistan. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 114, 105797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bechtel, B.; Demuzere, M.; Mills, G.; Zhan, W.; Sismanidis, P.; Small, C.; Voogt, J. SUHI analysis using Local Climate Zones—A comparison of 50 cities. Urban Clim. 2019, 28, 100451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, X.; Ye, R.; Fu, X. Assessment of Urban Local High-Temperature Disaster Risk and the Spatially Heterogeneous Impacts of Blue-Green Space. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. O’Malley, C.; Kikumoto, H. An investigation into heat storage by adopting local climate zones and nocturnal-diurnal urban heat island differences in the Tokyo Prefecture. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 83, 103959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, J. Effect of the Urbanization of Wetlands on Microclimate: A Case Study of Xixi Wetland, Hangzhou, China. Sustainability 2016, 8, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sharmin, T.; Chappell, A. Detecting the changing impact of urbanisation on urban heat islands in a tropical megacity using local climate zones. Energy Built Environ. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vu, D.H.; Muttaqi, K.M.; Agalgaonkar, A.P. A variance inflation factor and backward elimination based robust regression model for forecasting monthly electricity demand using climatic variables. Appl. Energy 2015, 140, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Prentice, P.; Publishing, H. Advanced Diagnostics for Multiple Regression: A Supplement to Multivariate Data Analysis Multivariate Data Analysis. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/24541751 (accessed on 12 March 2025).
  71. Lundberg, S.; Erion, G.; Lee, S.-I. Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1802.03888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. LCZ types and definitions, modified from Stewart and Oke [28].
Figure 1. LCZ types and definitions, modified from Stewart and Oke [28].
Buildings 15 01672 g001
Figure 2. Geographic location of Urumqi, China.
Figure 2. Geographic location of Urumqi, China.
Buildings 15 01672 g002
Figure 3. Workflow for this study.
Figure 3. Workflow for this study.
Buildings 15 01672 g003
Figure 4. Percentage of all LCZs (a), percentage of built-up LCZs (b), percentage of land-cover LCZs (c) and map of LCZs classification (d) in Urumqi, China.
Figure 4. Percentage of all LCZs (a), percentage of built-up LCZs (b), percentage of land-cover LCZs (c) and map of LCZs classification (d) in Urumqi, China.
Buildings 15 01672 g004
Figure 5. Map of heat risk in Urumqi.
Figure 5. Map of heat risk in Urumqi.
Buildings 15 01672 g005
Figure 6. (a) Heat risk map under LCZ framework in Urumqi, China. (b) Box line diagram of heat risk values in LCZ. (c) Percentage of heat risk level in LCZ.
Figure 6. (a) Heat risk map under LCZ framework in Urumqi, China. (b) Box line diagram of heat risk values in LCZ. (c) Percentage of heat risk level in LCZ.
Buildings 15 01672 g006
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of hazard (a), exposure (c), vulnerability (e), and adaptability (g) indicators in Urumqi, China, and the proportion of hazard (b), exposure (d), vulnerability (f), and adaptability (h) indicator classes corresponding to each LCZ.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of hazard (a), exposure (c), vulnerability (e), and adaptability (g) indicators in Urumqi, China, and the proportion of hazard (b), exposure (d), vulnerability (f), and adaptability (h) indicator classes corresponding to each LCZ.
Buildings 15 01672 g007
Figure 8. SHAP summary plot with bar chart of mean importance. Each point represents a sample. Red color corresponds to high eigenvalues and blue color corresponds to low eigenvalues.
Figure 8. SHAP summary plot with bar chart of mean importance. Each point represents a sample. Red color corresponds to high eigenvalues and blue color corresponds to low eigenvalues.
Buildings 15 01672 g008
Figure 9. Locations for proposing improvement strategies based on heat risk map.
Figure 9. Locations for proposing improvement strategies based on heat risk map.
Buildings 15 01672 g009
Table 1. Indicator selection and weighting methodology for the global component study.
Table 1. Indicator selection and weighting methodology for the global component study.
Research CitiesIndicator SystemIndicator SelectionEmpowerment Methodology
Karachi, Pakistan [53]HEVHazard: LST
Exposure: population density
Vulnerability: elderly population aged 60 years and over, children aged 10 years and under, illiterate population, building density, slum population, population with access to drinking water, bathrooms, electricity, children with a family size of 9 or more, poor population, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Perth, Australia [54]HEVHazard: LST
Exposure: population density
Vulnerability: age structure, ethnicity, socio-economic disadvantage, employment, living space, need for assistance, income, availability of internet connection and mobility
Equal Weighting System
Birmingham, UK [7]HEVHazard: high resolution urban heat island maps
Exposure: detailed commercial data per household
Vulnerability: filtered exposure layer
Equal Weighting System
Changzhou, China [16]HEVHazard: LST, frequency of high temperatures
Exposure: population density, frequency of high temperatures
Vulnerability: MNDWI, NDVI, night light data, population density over 65 years old
Entropy Weight Method (EWM)
Yangtze River Delta City Cluster, China [55]HEVHazard: surface temperature
Exposure: combination of enhanced vegetation index, nighttime lighting
Vulnerability: elderly population aged ≥65 years, elderly population aged 60 years or older living alone, illiteracy or semi-illiteracy rate among population aged 15 years or older, total number of beds in health facilities, number of air conditioners per 100 households, GDP per capita
PCA/EWM
Hong Kong, China [40]HEVHazard: hours of heat, hours of heat at night
Exposure: population density
Vulnerability: population aged 65 and over, uneducated population, households living alone, low-income households, renter population, population living in non-residential buildings
PCA
Santiago, Chile [15]HVIExposure: LST
Sensitivity: population over 60 years old, population with young children under 5 years old, population with disabilities, family structure, level of education, unemployed population
Adaptability: population with access to communication technology, population with access to water supply, housing materials, medical facilities, road network density, NDVI
PCA
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China [56]HVIHazard: daily surface temperature
Exposure: population density
Sensitivity: elderly population, child population, female population, nursing homes, kindergartens and primary schools
Adaptability: water cover, vegetation cover, night lighting, medical buildings
EWM
Turin, Italy [10]HEVAHazard: urban heat island distribution
Exposure: the over-65 population
Vulnerability: women over the age of 65, population over 85 years old, low education rate, social isolation, housing overcrowding, ethnic minorities coming from poor countries with high migration pressure, presence of ischemic heart disease, presence of cerebral vasculopathies, presence of heart failure, presence of diabetes, residential buildings in poor conditions, building density, population density, distance from watercourses
Adaptability: percentage of green area, average number of floors, possibility of conversion to green roofs, proximity to social welfare facilities, proximity to cool places
Equal Weighting System
Chengdu-Chongqing City Cluster, China [57]HEVAHazard: frequency of heat waves, maximum body temperature of heat waves, maximum duration of heat waves, total duration of heat waves
Exposure: habitat index
Vulnerability: time to hospital
Adaptability: river network density, gross regional product, number of beds in healthcare facilities, general public budget expenditure, residents’ savings balance
Criteria Importance Though Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC)
Dalian, China [45]HEVAHazard: radiant heat stress intensity
Exposure: population density, point of information (POI) density, road network density
Vulnerability: child population, elderly population, women’s population, twitter heat
Adaptability: year of construction, hot shelter sites, medical sites, GDP
CRITIC
Table 2. Selection, meaning, and sources of indicators.
Table 2. Selection, meaning, and sources of indicators.
Primary IndicatorsSecondary
Indicators
Meaning of
Indicators
DirectionSpatialization
Methodology
Data Sources
HazardLSTCharacterizing the intensity of surface thermal radiation+remote sensing inversionLANDSAT8 remote sensing imagery
ExposurePopulation DensityCharacterizing anthropogenic heat exposure+Arcgis Kernel Density Toolhttps://lbsyun.baidu.com. accessed on 1 August 2024.
POI DensityCharacterizing the clustering effect of urban functions+Arcgis Kernel Density ToolBIGEMAP
Road Network DensityCharacterizing the level of transport facilities+Arcgis Kernel Density ToolBIGEMAP
VulnerabilityChild PopulationCharacterizing the distribution of sensitive populations+Arcgis Kernel Density ToolBIGEMAP
Elderly PopulationCharacterizing the distribution of sensitive populations+Arcgis Kernel Density ToolBIGEMAP
Year of ConstructionCharacterizing building thermal regulation capacity-IDW interpolationhttps://wulumuqi.anjuke.com. accessed on 5 August 2024.
AdaptabilityHousing ValueCharacterizing the ability to regulate living conditions-IDW interpolationhttps://wulumuqi.anjuke.com. accessed on 5 August 2024.
High-temperature ShelterCharacterizing public thermal adaptability resource allocation-Arcgis Kernel Density ToolBIGEMAP
Medical FacilitiesCharacterizing health security capacity-Arcgis Kernel Density ToolBIGEMAP
GDPCharacterizing the potential for heat adaptability inputs-IDW interpolationhttps://www.resdc.cn. accessed on 5 August 2024.
Table 3. Results of weighting of indicators.
Table 3. Results of weighting of indicators.
Primary IndicatorsPrimary Indicators WeightsSecondary IndicatorsSecondary Indicators Weights
Hazard0.367LST1.000
Exposure0.195Population Density0.317
POI Density0.419
Road Network Density0.264
Vulnerability0.207Child Population0.253
Elderly Population0.240
Year of Construction0.507
Adaptability0.231Housing Value0.332
High-temperature Shelter0.206
Medical Facilities0.202
GDP0.260
Table 4. Built-up types of LCZ with highest and lowest heat risk in different studies.
Table 4. Built-up types of LCZ with highest and lowest heat risk in different studies.
Research CitiesKöppen–Geiger Climate
Classification
Risk
Indicators
Highest Heat Risk
Built-Up Type LCZ
Lowest Heat Risk
Built-Up Type LCZ
Urumqi, China (this study)BSkHEVALCZ 2LCZ 9
Karachi, Pakistan [53]BWhHEVLCZ 3LCZ 8
Kabul, Afghanistan [63]BSkLST
SUHI
LCZ 8
LCZ 8
LCZ 2
LCZ 35
Phoenix, AZ, USA [20]BWhLSTLCZ 8LCZ 4
Las Vegas, NV, USA [20]BWhLSTLCZ 8LCZ 4
50 cities in the world [64]/SUHILCZ 2LCZ 9
Cardiff, UK [8]CfbLST
SUHI
LCZ 3
LCZ 8
LCZ 9
LCZ 9
Changzhou, China [16]CfaHEVLCZ 1LCZ 9
Harbin, China [65]DwbHEVLCZ 2LCZ 9A
Table 5. Land-cover types of LCZs with highest and lowest heat risk in different studies.
Table 5. Land-cover types of LCZs with highest and lowest heat risk in different studies.
Research CitiesKöppen–Geiger Climate
Classification
Risk
Indicators
Highest Heat Risk
Land-Cover Type LCZs
Lowest Heat Risk
Land-Cover Type LCZs
Urumqi, China (this study)BSkHEVALCZ ELCZ G
Karachi, Pakistan [53]BWhHEVLCZ ELCZ G
Kabul, Afghanistan [63]BSkLST
SUHI
LCZ F
LCZ F
LCZ B
LCZ B
Phoenix, AZ, USA [20]BWhLSTLCZ ELCZ G
Las Vegas, NV, USA [20]BWhLSTLCZ FLCZ G
50 cities in the world [64]/SUHILCZ FLCZ D
Cardiff, UK [8]CfbLST
SUHI
LCZ F
LCZ F
LCZ A
LCZ A
Changzhou, China [16]CfaHEVLCZ ELCZ G
Harbin, China [65]DwbHEVLCZ ELCZ G
Table 6. Results of multicollinearity test.
Table 6. Results of multicollinearity test.
ModelUnstandardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientstSig.Collinearity Statistics
BStd. ErrorBetaToleranceVIF
(Constant)34,531,757.206151,893.600 227.3420.000
LST15,783.41572.5980.154217.4090.0000.9941.006
Population Density2794.47389.1650.03831.3410.0000.3352.983
Year of Construction−17,188.48175.457−0.187−227.7930.0000.7391.353
Housing Value39.1290.2180.149179.2520.0000.7271.375
High Temperature Shelter−270.47317.490−0.026−15.4650.0000.1715.840
Medical Facilities8590.258343.3500.04725.0190.0000.1407.138
GDP−0.1840.023−0.007−8.0990.0000.6651.503
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lan, H.; Zhang, H.; Gao, J.; Bai, J.; Wang, H.; Lu, C.; Geng, H. Heat Risk Assessment in Arid Zones Based on Local Climate Zones: A Case of Urumqi, China. Buildings 2025, 15, 1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101672

AMA Style

Lan H, Zhang H, Gao J, Bai J, Wang H, Lu C, Geng H. Heat Risk Assessment in Arid Zones Based on Local Climate Zones: A Case of Urumqi, China. Buildings. 2025; 15(10):1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lan, Hongxuan, Hongchi Zhang, Jialu Gao, Jin Bai, Hanxuan Wang, Cheng Lu, and Haoxuan Geng. 2025. "Heat Risk Assessment in Arid Zones Based on Local Climate Zones: A Case of Urumqi, China" Buildings 15, no. 10: 1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101672

APA Style

Lan, H., Zhang, H., Gao, J., Bai, J., Wang, H., Lu, C., & Geng, H. (2025). Heat Risk Assessment in Arid Zones Based on Local Climate Zones: A Case of Urumqi, China. Buildings, 15(10), 1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop