The Influence of Smart Green Spaces on Environmental Awareness, Social Cohesion, and Life Satisfaction in High-Rise Residential Communities
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Related Literature
2.1. The Impact of Smart Green Spaces on Enhancing Life Satisfaction
2.2. Smart Green Spaces, Social Interactions, and Environmental Awareness
2.3. The Neighborhood Environment and Social Cohesion in High-Rise Residential Communities
3. Statistics and Methodology
3.1. Case Study
- (1)
- Geographical focus: This study concentrated on primary urban districts known for high-density residential development, including Tianhe District, Yuexiu District, and Liwan District. These areas collectively accommodate a significant proportion of Guangzhou’s population and exhibit varying degrees of urban development and community infrastructure, making them ideal places for examining the integration and effects of smart green spaces.
- (2)
- Selection of communities: High-rise residential complexes constructed between 2000 and 2020 were targeted, focusing on those with established smart green spaces and communal facilities. Emphasis was placed on communities with advanced environmental amenities, incorporating technological innovations such as IoT systems for environmental monitoring and automated maintenance, reflecting a spectrum of architectural layouts and smart environmental design approaches related to community engagement and well-being.
- (3)
- Sampling criteria: Communities exhibiting a minimum occupancy rate of 75% were selected for inclusion in this study, as this threshold is believed to show a realistic representation of typical living conditions and dynamics. Additionally, communities comprising a diverse demographic profile were chosen, reflecting the inclusion of residents from a broad range of social backgrounds and household structures.
- (4)
- Characteristics of participants: The research intentionally included participants representing a range of ages, socio-economic statuses, and household compositions, ensuring a comprehensive exploration of how smart green spaces impact residents’ perceptions and experiences of environmental awareness, social cohesion, and overall life satisfaction.
3.2. Surveys
- (1)
- Demographic and behavioral profiling: A thorough examination of the demographic profiles and behavioral patterns of residents was conducted to gain insights into the utilization of smart green spaces and their impact on community well-being.
- (2)
- Environmental assessment: The classification of smart green spaces into distinct categories—such as recreational facilities, aesthetic features, and ecological diversity with integrated technological features—allowed for their perceptual and functional significance in fostering environmental awareness and social cohesion to be evaluated.
- (3)
- Quality-of-life metrics: The assessment of residents’ perceptions incorporated an examination of how smart green spaces contribute to overall life satisfaction. This was achieved through the measurement of psychological comfort, social interaction facilitation, and environmental stewardship, which were enhanced by greenery and smart technologies.
3.3. Structural Equation Models (SEM)
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
- (1)
- The intimacy between residents and smart green spaces shows a strong positive correlation with life satisfaction. The proximity to and engagement with smart green spaces not only improve the aesthetic appeal of the environment through interactive and adaptive design features but also serve as catalysts for social interactions and community cohesion. Specifically, the integration of smart technologies, such as sensor-activated lighting, automated maintenance systems, and diverse digital interfaces, within high-rise residential areas enhances residents’ daily experiences and promotes a sense of place attachment, reinforcing their satisfaction with urban living.
- (2)
- The significant influence of environmental awareness and social cohesion on life satisfaction in high-rise residential areas is self-evident. The heightened environmental awareness among residents, fostered by some smart systems that provide real-time data on environmental quality and energy use, instills a sense of responsibility towards sustainable living practices and environmental conservation, further reinforcing their satisfaction with the ecological integrity of their residential environment. Moreover, strong social cohesion within communities, enhanced by smart platforms for social networking and community participation, cultivates a sense of belonging and trust among residents, which is crucial for buffering against stressors and enhancing overall psychological well-being. Residents who feel socially connected through these smart features tend to engage in collective neighborhood activities that improve their living environment, thereby contributing to higher levels of life satisfaction.
- (3)
- Smart green spaces enhance life satisfaction by fostering social cohesion as a mediating path. These technologically integrated environments serve as central hubs for communal gatherings, fostering regular social interactions and promoting neighborhood cohesion. Residents who frequently engage in activities within these spaces, supported by smart scheduling systems and interactive event-planning tools, cultivate shared experiences and develop strong social bonds, which collectively contribute to the formation of a supportive community network. This accumulated social capital, bolstered by smart technologies, enhances residents’ sense of belonging and collective efficacy, thereby positively influencing their overall life satisfaction.
- (4)
- The hypothesis that individual characteristics influence residents’ life satisfaction has been validated. Individual factors, including age, socioeconomic status, and personal preferences, have been demonstrated to influence perceptions of living suitability and residential satisfaction. For example, residents with higher incomes may demonstrate a preference for smart green spaces that offer exclusive digital amenities or luxury smart features, which contribute to their sense of prestige and satisfaction.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Statista. Urbanization. In Statista-The Statistics Portal; Statista: New York, NY, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/9350/urbanization/ (accessed on 3 July 2024).
- Asri, A.K.; Lee, H.-Y.; Pan, W.-C.; Tsai, H.-J.; Chang, H.-T.; Lung, S.-C.C.; Su, H.-J.; Yu, C.-P.; Ji, J.S.; Wu, C.-D.; et al. Is green space exposure beneficial in a developing country? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2021, 215, 104226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Zheng, S.; Yang, S.; Dong, J.; Ma, M.; Zhang, S.; Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Yao, Y.; Han, B. Towards a Green Equal City: Measuring and matching the supply-demand of green exposure in urban center. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 365, 121510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabbar, M.; Nasar-U-Minallah, M.; Yusoff, M.M. Measuring and modeling the association between human psychological well-being and urban green spaces of Lahore, Pakistan. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2024, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, J.; Kim, H.J.; With, K.A. Urban green space alone is not enough: A landscape analysis linking the spatial distribution of urban green space to mental health in the city of Chicago. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 218, 104309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, H.; Li, C.; Yu, Y.; Peng, Z. Urban Public Green Space Equity against the Context of High-Speed Urbanization in Wuhan, Central China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jimenez, M.P.; DeVille, N.V.; Elliott, E.G.; Schiff, J.E.; Wilt, G.E.; Hart, J.E.; James, P. Associations between Nature Exposure and Health: A Review of the Evidence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Shoji, Y.; Tsuge, T.; Aikoh, T.; Kuriyama, K. Understanding services from ecosystem and facilities provided by urban green spaces: A use of partial profile choice experiment. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 111, 102086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuddus, A.; Tynan, E.; McBryde, E. Urbanization: A problem for the rich and the poor? Public Health Rev. 2020, 41, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vegaraju, A.; Amiri, S. Urban green and blue spaces and general and mental health among older adults in Washington state: Analysis of BRFSS data between 2011–2019. Health Place 2024, 85, 103148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, J.P.C.; Honório, N.A.; Barcellos, C.; Nobre, A.A. A Perspective on Inhabited Urban Space: Land Use and Occupation, Heat Islands, and Precarious Urbanization as Determinants of Territorial Receptivity to Dengue in the City of Rio De Janeiro. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, D.; Gao, D.; Wang, X.; Men, X.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Z. Influence mechanisms of the National Pollution Source Census on public participation and environmental consciousness in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, E.-H.; Roberts, J.E.; Eum, Y.; Li, X.; Konty, K. Exposure to urban green space may both promote and harm mental health in socially vulnerable neighborhoods: A neighborhood-scale analysis in New York City. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 112292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beute, F.; Marselle, M.R.; Olszewska-Guizzo, A.; Andreucci, M.B.; Lammel, A.; Davies, Z.G.; Glanville, J.; Keune, H.; O’Brien, L.; Remmen, R.; et al. How do different types and characteristics of green space impact mental health? A scoping review. People Nat. 2023, 5, 1839–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, J.; Peng, L.; Chen, T.; Cong, G. The role of social impact on consumer attitudes toward green and healthy home appliances during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Han, L.; Mei, R. An Impact Asymmetry Analysis of Small Urban Green Space Attributes to Enhance Visitor Satisfaction. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longato, D.; Cortinovis, C.; Balzan, M.; Geneletti, D. A method to prioritize and allocate nature-based solutions in urban areas based on ecosystem service demand. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2023, 235, 104743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macháč, J.; Brabec, J.; Arnberger, A. Exploring public preferences and preference heterogeneity for green and blue infrastructure in urban green spaces. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 75, 127695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Love, J.; Selker, R.; Marsman, M.; Jamil, T.; Dropmann, D.; Verhagen, J.; Ly, A.; Gronau, Q.F.; Smíra, M.; Epskamp, S.; et al. JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. J. Stat. Softw. 2019, 88, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leach, M.; Reyers, B.; Bai, X.; Brondizio, E.S.; Cook, C.; Díaz, S.; Espindola, G.; Scobie, M.; Stafford-Smith, M.; Subramanian, S.M. Equity and sustainability in the anthropocene: A social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Glob. Sustain. 2018, 1, e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenzholzer, S.; Duchhart, I.; Koh, J. Research through designing in landscape architecture. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 113, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Han, Y.; Li, Q.; Tang, D. Optimizing Public Space in High-Rise Residences: A Whole Life Cycle Perspective with Kruskal Algorithm—A Case Study of a Shanghai High-Rise Residential Project. Buildings 2024, 14, 1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geneshka, M.; Coventry, P.; Cruz, J.; Gilbody, S. Relationship between Green and Blue Spaces with Mental and Physical Health: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Observational Studies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larondelle, N.; Lauf, S. Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales. Ecosyst. Serv. 2016, 22, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavrakas, P. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods; Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Kim, S.K. Exploring the equality of accessing urban green spaces: A comparative study of 341 Chinese cities. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ta, N.; Li, H.; Zhu, Q.; Wu, J. Contributions of the quantity and quality of neighborhood green space to residential satisfaction in suburban Shanghai. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 64, 127293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyshol, H.; Johansen, R. The association of access to green space with low mental distress and general health in older adults: A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2024, 24, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardinali, M.; Beenackers, M.A.; Fleury-Bahi, G.; Bodénan, P.; Petrova, M.T.; van Timmeren, A.; Pottgiesser, U. Examining green space characteristics for social cohesion and mental health outcomes: A sensitivity analysis in four European cities. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 93, 128230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masterson, V.A.; Stedman, R.C.; Enqvist, J.; Tengö, M.; Giusti, M.; Wahl, D.; Svedin, U. The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: A review and research agenda. Ecol. Soc. 2017, 22, art49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Dijst, M.; Faber, J.; Helbich, M. Using structural equation modeling to examine pathways between perceived residential green space and mental health among internal migrants in China. Environ. Res. 2020, 183, 109121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nahlik, A.M.; Kentula, M.E.; Fennessy, M.S.; Landers, D.H. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 77, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naumann, S.; Burgos Cuevas, N.; Davies, C.; Bradley, S.; Mahmoud, I.; Arlati, A. Harnessing the Power of Collaboration for Nature-Based Solutions: New Ideas and Insights for Local Decision-Makers; Publications Office of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venhoeven, L.; Bolderdijk, J.; Steg, L. Explaining the paradox: How pro-environmental behavior can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability 2013, 5, 1372–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, F.; Chen, Y.; Yue, W.; Wang, Y. High-Rise Residential District Morphology Optimization for Enhancing the Green Space Cooling Effect. Buildings 2024, 14, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varma, C.S.; Palaniappan, S. Comparison of green building rating schemes used in North America, Europe and Asia. Habitat Int. 2019, 89, 101989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, C.W. Activity, exercise and the planning and design of outdoor spaces. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 34, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.W.; DiGiacomo, A.; Kingstone, A. A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: An observational study on food disposal. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.W.L.; DiGiacomo, A.; Lenkic, P.J.; Wong, V.K.; Kingstone, A. Being in a “green” building elicits “greener” recycling, but not necessarily “better” recycling. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0145737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Li, H. Sustainable consumption and life satisfaction. Soc. Indic. Res. 2011, 104, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Kwan, M.-P.; Wong, M.S.; Yu, C. Current methods for evaluating people’s exposure to green space: A scoping review. Soc. Sci. Med. 2023, 338, 116303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Y.; Chen, Z.; Lu, X.; Sheng, S.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y. The degradation and marginal effects of green space under the stress of urban sprawl in the metropolitan area. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 95, 128318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornwell, E.Y.; Cagney, K.A. Assessment of neighborhood context in a nationally representative study. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2014, 69, S51–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilcins, D.; Sly, P.D.; Scarth, P.; Mavoa, S. Green space in health research: An overview of common indicators of greenness. Rev. Environ. Health 2024, 39, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walls, M.; Gerarden, T.; Palmer, K.; Bak, X.F. Is energy efficiency capitalized into home prices? Evidence from three US cities. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2017, 82, 104–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Shaw, D. The complexity of high-density neighbourhood development in China: Intensification, deregulation and social sustainability challenges. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 43, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Mauree, D.; Sun, Q.; Lin, H.; Scartezzini, J.; Wennersten, R. A review of approaches to low-carbon transition of high-rise residential buildings in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 131, 109990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, W.; Ramalho, O.; Mandin, C. Indoor air quality requirements in green building certifications. Build. Environ. 2015, 92, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wells, C.S. Confirmatory factor analysis. In Assessing Measurement Invariance for Applied Research, Educational and Psychological Testing in a Global Context; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 245–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weston, R.; Gore, P.A., Jr. A brief guide to structural equation modeling. Couns. Psychol. 2006, 34, 719–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, E.V.; Gatersleben, B. Greenery on residential buildings: Does it affect preferences and perceptions of beauty? J. Environ. Psychol. 2011, 31, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wohlwill, J.F. The physical environment: A problem for a psychology of stimulation. J. Soc. Issues 1966, 22, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norton, B.; Costanza, R.; Bishop, R.C. The evolution of preferences: Why ‘sovereign’ preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 24, 193–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyumba, T.; Wilson, K.; Derrick, C.J.; Mukherjee, N. The Use of Focus Group Discussion Methodology: Insights from Two Decades of Application in Conservation. In Methods in Ecology and Evolution; Geneletti, D., Ed.; British Ecological Society: London, UK, 2018; Volume 9, pp. 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oral, H.V.; Carvalho, P.; Gajewska, M.; Ursino, N.; Masi, F.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Kazak, J.K.; Exposito, A.; Cipolletta, G.; Andersen, T.R.; et al. A review of nature-based solutions for urban water management in European circular cities: A critical assessment based on case studies and literature. Blue-Green Syst. 2020, 2, 112–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, Y.; Zhong, Y.; He, Q.; Dai, J. Assessing the Equity of Accessibility to Urban Green Space: A Study of 254 Cities in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes-Riveros, R.; Altamirano, A.; De La Barrera, F.; Rozas-Vásquez, D.; Vieli, L.; Meli, P. Linking public urban green spaces and human well-being: A systematic review. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 61, 127105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.W.F.; Kim, J.T. Building pathology, investigation of sick buildings—VOC emissions. Indoor Built Environ. 2010, 19, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, K.-S.; Wu, T.-J. Environmental stressors and well-being on middle-aged and elderly people: The mediating role of outdoor leisure behavior and place attachment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Zhou, D.; Wang, Y.; Meng, X.; Gu, Z.; Xu, D.; Han, X. Planning method of centralized greening in high-rise residential blocks based on improvement of thermal comfort in summer. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 80, 103802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D. From Green Buildings Towards Urban Sustainability: Lessons From the Singapore Green Building System; Working Paper; NUS Department of Real Estate: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, D.; Tu, Y. Real Estate Developers and the Mandatory Green Building Control Regulations: Evidence from Singapore; Working Paper; NUS Department of Real Estate: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L.; Wu, L. Effects of environmental quality perception on depression: Subjective social class as a mediator. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Liu, Y.; Cui, C.; Xia, B. Influence of outdoor living environment on elders’ quality of life in old residential communities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Y.; Yang, D.; Xu, D. How built environment affects the mental health of urban older adults: Contrasting perspective based on observation and perception. China City Plan. Rev. 2022, 31, 26–37. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Altan, H. A comparison of the occupant comfort in a conventional high-rise office block and a contemporary environmentally-concerned building. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Timmermans, E.J.; Zou, D.; Grobbee, D.E.; Zhou, S.; Vaartjes, I. Impact of green space exposure on blood pressure in Guangzhou, China: Mediation by air pollution, mental health, physical activity, and weight status. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 356, 124251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsadek, M.; Liu, B.; Xie, J. Window view and relaxation: Viewing green space from a high-rise estate improves urban dwellers’ wellbeing. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 55, 126846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J. Perceived residential environment of neighborhood and subjective well-being among the elderly in China: A mediating role of sense of community. J. Environ. Psychol. 2017, 51, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y. Toward community engagement: Can the built environment help? Grassroots participation and communal space in Chinese urban communities. Habitat Int. 2015, 46, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Chen, X.; Cui, H.; Ma, Y.; Gao, N.; Li, X.; Meng, X.; Lin, H.; Abudou, H.; Guo, L.; et al. Green space exposure on depression and anxiety outcomes: A meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 116303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, J.; Zhao, Z.Y. Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 30, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Ye, Z.; Yang, H. Thoughts on the underused urban land redevelopment in the era of inventory planning. China Land Sci. 2019, 33, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, L.; Li, Y.; Deng, Y.; Wang, J. Spatial-temporal differentiation, influencing factors and over-standard control of residential floor area ratio in Guangzhou City. Areal Res. Dev. 2023, 42, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Y.; Jia, G. The breakthrough point of redevelopment and utilization of low-efficiency urban land. Urban Dev. Stud. 2021, 10, 74–75. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, S.; Qin, Q. The theory research of urban habitability. J. Beijing City Univ. 2012, 1, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, R.; Huang, W.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, H.; Deng, H.; Jia, Z. Optimization and change analysis of the ecological relevant hydrological indicators in the lower research of the Fu River on PCA-RF. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2024, 33, 1563–1575. [Google Scholar]
- Tsiotas, D.; Makridis, E.; Polyzos, S. Measuring the effect of COVID-19 on the functionality of urban public spaces: The case of Thessaloniki, Greece. Theor. Empir. Res. Urban Manag. 2023, 18, 5–23. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.D.; Ye, J.; Tarin, M.W.K.; Liu, Y.Y.; Zheng, Y.S. Tourists’ Safety Perception Clues in the Urban Forest Environment: Visual Quality, Facility Completeness, Accessibility-A Case Study of Urban Forests in Fuzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mak, B.K.L.; Jim, C.Y. Contributions of human and environmental factors to concerns of personal safety and crime in urban parks. Secur. J. 2021, 35, 263–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carothers, P.; Vaske, J.J.; Donnelly, M.P. Social Values versus Interpersonal Conflict among Hikers and Mountain Bikers. Leis. Sci. 2001, 23, 47–61. [Google Scholar]
- Bachinger, M.; Hafner, M.; Harprecht, P. Cultural and space-based factors influencing recreational conflicts in forests. The example of cyclists and other forest visitors in Freiburg (Germany). Eur. J. Cult. Manag. Policy 2024, 13, 12494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Wu, L. Green and Blue Space Availability and Self-Rated Health among Seniors in China: Evidence from a National Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, L. Analysis on the Causes and Countermeasures of Inefficient Land Use: Taking the Western Region as an Example. Land China 2017, 380, 37–39. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y. Research on the path of residents’ willingness to upgrade by installing elevators in old residential quarters based on safety precautions. Saf. Sci. 2019, 118, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, D.; Leitão, P.J.; Sikor, T. Comparing the determinants of cropland abandonment in Albania and Romania using boosted regression trees. Agric. Syst. 2013, 117, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heikoop, T.H. Assessing soil sealing and ecosystem services of urban front yards using Google Street View: A case study in Bloemhof district Rotterdam, the Netherlands. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 955, 012019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Kim, D.H. Urban Forest Visit Motivation Scale: Development and Validation. Sustainability 2023, 15, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Herzele, A.; Collins, K.; Tyrväinen, L. Involving People in Urban Forestry—A Discussion of Participatory Practices Throughout Europe. In Urban Forests and Trees: A Reference Book; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 207–228. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, S.; Patuano, A. Multiple ecosystem services of informal green spaces: A literature review. Urban For. Urban Green. 2023, 81, 127849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Year | Urban Population (million) | High-Rise Residential Development Area (million sqm) | Urban Area (km²) | Population Density (Persons/km²) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 456.8 | 1.9 | 17,596 | 1.9 |
2005 | 562.1 | 2.3 | 19,384 | 2.3 |
2010 | 636.1 | 3.2 | 19,878 | 3.2 |
2015 | 749.2 | 4.5 | 21,406 | 4.5 |
2020 | 848.4 | 5.7 | 22,326 | 5.7 |
Topic | Key Findings |
---|---|
Smart Green Spaces and Life Satisfaction | Enhances health and reduces stress, but broader impacts need further research |
Smart Green Spaces and Social Interactions | Promotes social networks, intergenerational interactions, and community resilience |
Smart Green Spaces and Environmental Awareness | Increases environmental action, sustainable behaviors, and conservation knowledge |
High-Rise Communities and Social Cohesion | Challenges in social interaction; green spaces and communal areas can foster community |
X | → | Y | Z (CR Value) | p | Standardized Regression Coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual Characteristics | → | Life Satisfaction | 6.454 | p ≤ 0.01 | 0.392 |
Social Cohesion | → | Life Satisfaction | 10.261 | p ≤ 0.01 | 0.561 |
Environmental Awareness | → | Life Satisfaction | 4.141 | p ≤ 0.01 | 0.263 |
Green Spaces’ Environment | → | Social Cohesion | 3.466 | p ≤ 0.01 | 0.223 |
Green Spaces’ Environment | → | Environmental Awareness | 2.367 | p ≤ 0.05 | 0.154 |
Green Spaces’ Environment | → | Life Satisfaction | 4.449 | p ≤ 0.01 | 0.282 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Luo, Y.; Fu, Z.; Zhang, S. The Influence of Smart Green Spaces on Environmental Awareness, Social Cohesion, and Life Satisfaction in High-Rise Residential Communities. Buildings 2024, 14, 2917. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092917
Li Y, Wu Y, Luo Y, Fu Z, Zhang S. The Influence of Smart Green Spaces on Environmental Awareness, Social Cohesion, and Life Satisfaction in High-Rise Residential Communities. Buildings. 2024; 14(9):2917. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092917
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Yixuan, Yincai Wu, Yiru Luo, Zhiwei Fu, and Shiran Zhang. 2024. "The Influence of Smart Green Spaces on Environmental Awareness, Social Cohesion, and Life Satisfaction in High-Rise Residential Communities" Buildings 14, no. 9: 2917. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092917
APA StyleLi, Y., Wu, Y., Luo, Y., Fu, Z., & Zhang, S. (2024). The Influence of Smart Green Spaces on Environmental Awareness, Social Cohesion, and Life Satisfaction in High-Rise Residential Communities. Buildings, 14(9), 2917. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092917