Next Article in Journal
Optimization of A354 Al-Si-Cu-Mg Alloy Heat Treatment: Effect on Microstructure, Hardness, and Tensile Properties of Peak Aged and Overaged Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Diffusion Bonding and Brazing of Advanced Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

One-Step Preparation of Super-Hydrophobic Micro-Nano Dendrites on Al Alloy for Enhanced Corrosion Resistance

1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 58 Yanta Road, Xi’an 710054, China
2
School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, 122 Luoshi Road, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2018, 8(11), 960; https://doi.org/10.3390/met8110960
Submission received: 1 October 2018 / Revised: 7 November 2018 / Accepted: 14 November 2018 / Published: 17 November 2018

Abstract

:
Corrosion failure is a thorny issue that restricts the applications of Al alloys. As a research hotspot in functional realization, hydrophobic fabrication exactly offers an efficient method to settle metallic corrosions. This work has developed a facile and low-cost method to enhance corrosion resistance of Al alloys. The micro-nano dendrites have been firstly prepared on metallic substrate using one-step potentiostatic deposition. Then, wetting and electrochemical behaviors have been systematically investigated after stearic acid modification. Results show that the as-prepared surface possesses amplified and durable water repellence with an apparent contact angle (CA) of 154.2° and a sliding angle (SA) of 4.7°. Meanwhile, owing to the trapped air in dendrites, the newly-generated solid-air-liquid interfaces help to resist seawater penetration by reducing interfacial interactions on the super-hydrophobic surface as well as significantly enhance its corrosion resistance. This work sheds positive insights into extending the applications of Al alloys in many areas, especially for ocean engineering fields.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Al alloys have been extensively used as engineering components, parts and plates in shipbuilding and oceanic engineering areas because of their easy accessibility, good workability, high specific strength and low price [1,2]. Usually, Al alloys are easily oxidized to protect themselves from corrosion [3]. However, reactive anions can erode metallic substrates thereby leading to corrosion failures in wet conditions [4]. As a result, their service lives and application fields are seriously restricted. Hence, the study of protecting Al alloys from corrosion in seawater is of great economic value and practical significance.
In recent years, various methods have been developed to enhance corrosion resistances of Al alloys, such as corrosion inhibitor [5], mechanical alloying [6], aging process [7,8], laser treatment [9] and friction stir welding [10]. In addition, Kaseemet al. have reported an oxide film on 7075 Al alloy with enhanced corrosion resistance in 3.5% NaCl solution via the micro-arc oxidation process [11]. Ji et al. have prepared an alumina coating on LY12 Al alloy using micro-arc oxidation and the phosphate process for improved corrosion resistance in seawater [12]. However, phosphate technology and the coatings with heavy metal ions are contaminative. Laser treatment is usually uncontrollable. Some other methods may be complicated and costly. Hence, it is still a big challenge to develop facile, low-cost and environment-friendly anticorrosion methods for Al alloys.
Inspired by the water-repelling and self-cleaning instincts of lotus leaves [13,14], preparing super-hydrophobic layers on Al alloys can reduce interfacial interactions with corrosive mediums in seawater, thereby postponing their corrosion rates. Usually, high stability of Cassie wetting state as well as high apparent contact angle and low sliding angle are necessary for a super-hydrophobic surface [15,16]. In recent years, various methods have been reported to fabricate super-hydrophobic Al alloys, such as chemical etching [17], in suit polymerization [18], sol-gel process [19], grinding technique [20], laser process [21] and spraying technique [22]. In addition, Wu et al. have prepared a super-hydrophobic 2024 Al alloy with excellent water repellence using chemical etching and anodic oxidation [23]. Wei et al. have fabricated a super-hydrophobic Al alloy via multi-step etching, electro-deposition and modification processes [24]. Li et al. have reported a super-hydrophobic Al sheet with three steps including etching, replacement deposition and annealingtreatment [25]. However, the corrosion resistances in seawater are seldom investigated in the works above. In addition, some super-hydrophobic processes are carried out under poor and complicated conditions.
Herein, a low-cost and facile approach is developed to fabricate multifunctional Al alloys’ surfaces. Firstly, micro-nano dendrites have been prepared on Al alloy surface with one-step potentiostatic deposition. After stearic acid modification of rough structures, a super-hydrophobic surface is attained. Finally, its corrosion resistance in seawater is evaluated via electrochemical tests. The resultant surface contributes to reduce interfacial interactions with corrosive mediums induced by the newly-generated solid-air-liquid interfaces. This work sheds positive insights into broadening applications of Al alloys especially in oceanic areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The commercially available 5005 Al alloys plates (10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm) with compositions of 97.0 wt. % Al, 1.5 wt. % Mg, 0.7 wt. % Fe, 0.2 wt. % Mn, 0.2 wt. % Zn, 0.2 wt. % Cu, 0.1 wt. % Si and 0.1 wt. % Cr were purchased from Shanghai Haocheng Metal Co., Ltd., China. Stearic acid (STA, >96%), silver nitrate (AR, ≥99.8%) and ethanol absolute (AR) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Deionized (DI) water was made from a millipore water purification system (MilliQ, specific resistivity > 18 MΩ·cm, S.A., Molsheim, France).

2.2. Preparation

Al alloys were sequentially polished with W40, W10 and W3.5 sandpapers before ultrasonically cleaning in ethanol and DI water. After that, potentiostatic deposition was conducted in 20 mM silver nitrate solution at −0.50 V for 90 s using an electrochemical workstation (CHI660D, Chenhua Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) equipped with a standard three-electrode system (the prepared sample as a working electrode, the saturated calomel electrode as a reference electrode and the Pt net as a counter electrode). Then, the as-prepared samples were dried with high pure nitrogen and surface modification was executed by immersing them into ethanol–water solution (volume ratio of 1:1) of 10 mM STA for 12 h. Finally, the resultant samples werecleanedand dried in air for use.

2.3. Characterization

Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM, FEI Quanta200 FEG, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDX, Oxford Instruments Inca X-Max, Oxfordshire, UK) were used to characterize morphologies andcompositions. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted to determine crystal structures using a D8 Advance Diffract Meter (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 40 kV. Contact Angle Meter (OCA20, Dataphysics GmbH, Filderstadt, Germany) was used to assess the wettability by using water droplets (4 μL). An electrochemical workstation (CHI660D, Chenhua Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) equipped with a standard three-electrode system (exposing area of 1 cm2 for aworking electrode) was used to evaluate corrosion resistance in 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution. Polarization curve was recorded from −1400 to −400 mV with a scanning rate of 1 mV/s. Electrochemical impedance spectroscope (EIS) was tested between 10 mHz and 100 kHz with a sine wave amplitude of 10 mV. Before tests, electrodes were immersed into electrolyte for 0.5 h to achieve steady states. The consistency analysis of polarization test was conducted with three samples for each preparation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure Characterization

SEM images of the deposited Al alloy surfaces at various magnifications are shown in Figure 1a–c. Clearly, uniformly dispersed micro-nano dendrites form on sample with average trunk length of 15 μm (Figure 1b) and sub-branch dimension of 500 nm (Figure 1c). The formation of dendrites on Al alloy surfacelies on the deposition process (Figure 1d). Firstly, sporadic nucleation sites with silver buds gradually take shapes induced by the reduction reaction in silver nitrate solution. Then, nucleation tips with low energy promote sustained buds attachment thereby aggregating nuclei to form trunks, branches and sub-branches. As reduction, nucleation, adsorption and aggregation continue, the resultant dendrites grow rapidly on Al alloy surface.
To gain insights into the deposited surface, EDX and mapping analysesare conducted and the results are shown in Figure 2a. Clearly, Al alloy is mainly composed of Al, Mg and O implying the existence of metallic oxides on substrate. In addition, Ag elements (Lα = 2.98 keV, Lβ = 3.20 keV, Lγ = 3.52 keV, Ll = 2.63 keV) are observed, which come from the micro-nano dendrites prepared in such deposition process. XRD analysis is also carried out to determine crystal structures of dendrites deposited on Al alloy, as seen in Figure 2b. The characteristic peaks at 38.4°, 46.5°, 65.0°, 77.4° and 81.3° are indexed as (111), (200), (220), (311) and (222) crystal planes indicating the face-centered cubic structures of silver dendrites (JCPDS file No. 4-783). Meanwhile, the broadening background diffractions and characteristic peak at 22.0° result from the aluminum oxide membrane on Al alloy substrate [26].

3.2. Wettability Characterization

Wet abilities of Al alloy substrate are analyzed in Figure 3a,b. Clearly, a hydrophilic substrate is observed. After STA modification of Al alloy substrate (modified substrate), a hydrophobic CA of 90.8° is achieved (Figure 3c). However, after STA modification of the deposited Al alloy sample (modified deposited sample), a super-hydrophobic CA (>150.0°) of 154.2° is attained (Figure 3e). SA is another indispensable parameter for assessing wettabilities [27]. As seen, the droplet still adheres to modified substrate even when it tilts to 90.0° suggesting a strong adhesion to liquid (Figure 3d). However, for the modified deposited sample, a super-hydrophobic SA (<10.0°) of 4.7° is achieved, thereby displaying excellent water repellence (Figure 3f).
For Al alloy substrate, water easily wets a metallic surface suggesting a solid-liquid interface (Figure 3a,b). However, for modified deposited surface, super-hydrophobic behavior is attained indicating the Cassie-Baxter wetting model [28]. In such state, modified dendrites help to trap air when contacting with liquid leading to the formation of solid-air-liquid interfaces (Figure 4a), which can be quantitatively clarified in the Cassie-Baxter equation [28]:
cos CA = f1 cosθ − f2 (f1 + f2 = 1),
where θ represents the intrinsic contact angle (90.8°), f1 and f2 refers to the proportions of a droplet contacting with as-prepared surface and air, respectively. This equation reveals that, for modified deposited sample, the super-hydrophobic CA of 154.2° signifies a droplet 90.0% making contact with air, thereby looking like a spherical droplet standing on as-prepared surface (Figure 4b). Hence, the wettability has been prepared from hydrophilicity to super-hydrophobicity by depositing micro-nano dendrites on Al alloy surface. In addition, the high stability of Cassie wetting state resulting from its durable super-hydrophobicity is also achieved for a modified deposited sample (Figure 4c).

3.3. Anticorrosion Characterization

The corrosion resistances of as-prepared samples are characterized by potentiodynamic polarization curves in Figure 5a. Generally, a surface with low corrosion current density and positive-shifting corrosion potential can gain superior anticorrosion ability [29]. After fitting with the Tafel extrapolation method, current densities for substrate, modified substrate and modified deposited sample are achieved with 2.90, 1.62 and 0.66 μA/cm2, respectively. Meanwhile, corrosion potentials shift positively from −1.15, −0.97 to −0.83 V for the samples above. These data indicate that the modified deposited sample possesses superior corrosion resistance, followed by modified substrate and then Al alloy substrate. Meanwhile, good consistency of polarization tests is also achieved for as-prepared samples (Figure 5b).
EIS analyses are also used to assess their corrosion resistances and the resultant Nyquist plots are shown in Figure 6. In a Nyquist plot, a big capacitive reactance arcsignifies a better hindrance of capacitance to charge transfers, which also suggests a superior corrosion resistance [29]. As seen, the capacitive reactance arc for a modified deposited sample is larger than others, and the same goes for anticorrosion ability. Hence, the same trend about corrosion resistance displayed in the polarization curve coincides well with EIS results.
To obtain electrochemical data of as-prepared samples, ZSimDemo software (3.20, Chenhua Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) is used to fit EIS plots. After fittings, the circuit pattern Rs(CdlRct1) in Figure 6 is found suitable to fit the EIS curve of Al alloy substrate in seawater. In this model, Rs, Cdl and Rct1 represent solution resistance, double-layer capacitance and charge-transfer resistance, respectively. The pattern Rs(Cc(Rc(Cdl(Rct2W)))) in Figure 6 is found to be appropriate to equate electrochemical processes of modified samples (including modified substrate and modified deposited sample), where Cc and Rc respectively refer to capacitance and resistance ofmodified films. Diffusion impedance (W) is used to characterize the inhibitory ability ofthe diffusion process from solution to electrode surface. In an electrode process, Cc and Cdl are concerned with constant phase elements (CPE) for characterizing capacitances. After fittings, the electrochemical data areachieved in Table 1. As seen, small fitting errorsare observed, whichfurther demonstrates the reasonable fittings of experimental EIS results. After comparison and analysis, the modified deposited sample gains the maximum impedance and minimum capacitance suggesting greatly improved corrosion resistance.
Al alloy substrate displays poor corrosion resistance. This is a result of the reactive anions in seawater, which directly corrodesthe substrate, thus leading to metallic failures (Figure 7a). After STA modification of substrate, the corrosion resistance has been greatly improved. This is due to the STA layer, which exactly hinders seawater penetrations by impeding interfacial interactions between corrosive ions and Al alloy substrate (Figure 7b). However, for the modified deposited sample, the corrosion resistance is further enhanced. This is not only because of the assembled STA layer. On the other hand, the as-prepared super-hydrophobic dendrites help to improve the chance for trapping air (Figure 7c). The air phase can serve as dielectric for a parallel plate capacitor, which exactly keeps the electrons from transferring between seawater and sample. Based on these, the Al alloy has been prepared with greatly enhanced corrosion resistance in seawater with deposition and modification processes in this work.
The stabilities of wettabilities and corrosion resistances in seawater are investigated for modified deposited sample, as shown in Figure 8. Clearly, after 20 days of immersion, both apparent contact angles (Figure 8a) and corrosion current densities (Figure 8b) are maintained at relatively stable levels, suggesting excellent durability in seawater. Hence, the durable corrosion resistance of the as-prepared Al alloy resulting from its super-hydrophobic stability is achieved to expand its potential applications as engineering materials in extreme environments.

4. Conclusions

(1)
Uniformly dispersed micro-nano dendrites have been fabricated on 5005 Al alloy surface using a facile potentiostatic deposition treatment.
(2)
After stearic acid modification, the as-prepared dendrites have displayed greatly amplified and durable water repellence with super-hydrophobic apparent contact angle of 154.2° and sliding angle of 4.7°.
(3)
The Super-hydrophobic Al alloy surface has been prepared with greatly enhanced corrosion resistance in seawater by reducing interfacial interactions between corrosive ions and modified deposited surface, owing to the newly-generated composite solid-air-liquid interfaces.

Author Contributions

Q.Z. and X.L. conceived and designed the experiments. T.S., C.Z. and Y.L. performed the experiments. B.L. and B.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors analyzed the data, checked the article and contributed to the interpretation of the results. X.L., T.S., C.Z. and Y.L. revised the manuscript.

Funding

The work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51875425, 51705416, 51804251) and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in the Shanxi Province of China (No.2016JQ5054).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Chen Zhou and Dong Yu (Analytical and Testing Center, WHUT) for help in SEM observation and EDX analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Seikh, A.H.; Baig, M.; Ammar, H.R.; Alam, M.A. The influence of transition metals addition on the corrosion resistance of nanocrystalline Al alloys produced by mechanical alloying. Metals 2016, 6, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wan, H.L.; Lin, J.P.; Min, J.Y. Effect of laser ablation treatment on corrosion resistance of adhesive-bonded Al alloy joints. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 345, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ou, J.F.; Fang, X.Z.; Zhao, W.J.; Lei, S.; Xue, M.S.; Wang, F.J.; Li, C.Q.; Lu, Y.L.; Li, W. Influence of hydrostatic pressure on corrosion behavior of superhydrophobic surfaces on bare and oxidized aluminum substrates. Langmuir 2018, 34, 5807–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Olajire, A.A. Recent advances on organic coating system technologies for corrosion protection of offshore metallic structures. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 269, 572–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, J.C.; Dang, J. A Summary of corrosion properties of Al-rich solid solution and secondary phase particles in Al alloys. Metals 2017, 7, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, X.Y.; Wang, Z.P.; Fu, B.G.; Long, L.; Zhang, X.L.; Cui, H.X. Effects of Mg content on the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 685, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, Y.Q.; Zhan, L.H. Effect of creep aging process on microstructures and properties of the retrogressed Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. Metals 2016, 6, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qi, H.; Liu, X.Y.; Liang, S.X.; Zhang, X.L.; Cui, H.X.; Zheng, L.Y.; Gao, F.; Chen, Q.H. Mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of Al-Cu-Mg-Ag heat-resistant alloy modified by interrupted aging. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 657, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Gu, X.H.; Qin, P.; Dai, N.W.; Li, X.P.; Kruth, J.P.; Zhang, L.C. Improved corrosion behavior of ultrafine-grained eutectic Al-12Si alloy produced by selective laser melting. Mater. Des. 2018, 146, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fouladi, S.; Ghasemi, A.H.; Abbasi, M.; Abedini, M.; Khorasani, A.M.; Gibson, I. The effect of vibration during friction stir welding on corrosion behavior, mechanical properties, and machining characteristics of stir zone. Metals 2017, 7, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaseem, M.; Lee, Y.H.; Ko, Y.G. Incorporation of MoO2, and ZrO2, particles into the oxide film formed on 7075 Al alloy via micro-arc oxidation. Mater. Lett. 2016, 182, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ji, S.P.; Weng, Y.C.; Wu, Z.Z.; Ma, Z.Y.; Tian, X.B.; Fu, R.K.Y.; Lin, H.; Wu, G.S.; Chu, P.K.; Pan, F. Excellent corrosion resistance of P and Fe modified micro-arc oxidation coating on Al alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 710, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Watson, G.S.; Green, D.W.; Cribb, B.W.; Brown, C.L.; Meritt, C.R.; Tobin, M.J.; Vongsvivut, J.; Sun, M.X.; Liang, A.P.; Watson, J.A. Insect analogue to the lotus leaf: A planthopper wing membrane incorporating a low-adhesion, nonwetting, superhydrophobic, bactericidal, and biocompatible surface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 24381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Frankiewicz, C.; Attinger, D. Texture and wettability of metallic lotus leaves. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 3982–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Marmur, A.; Volpe, C.D.; Siboni, S.; Amirfazli, A.; Drelich, J.W. Contact angles and wettability: Towards common and accurate terminology. Surf. Innov. 2017, 5, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nosonovsky, M. Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interfaces. Langmuir 2007, 23, 3157–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shi, T.; Kong, J.Y.; Wang, X.D.; Li, X.W. Preparation of multifunctional Al-Mg alloy surface with hierarchical micro/nanostructures by selective chemical etching processes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 389, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xiao, X.; Xie, W.; Ye, Z. Preparation of corrosion-resisting superhydrophobic surface on aluminium substrate. Surf. Eng. 2018, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, J.W.; Hwang, W. Exploiting the silicon content of aluminum alloys to create a superhydrophobic surface using the sol-gel process. Mater. Lett. 2016, 168, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, H.D.; Zhang, X.R.; Wan, Y.L.; Xu, J.K.; Yu, Z.J.; Li, Y.Q. Superhydrophobic surface prepared by micromilling and grinding on aluminium alloy. Surf. Eng. 2016, 32, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Boinovich, L.B.; Modin, E.B.; Sayfutdinova, A.R.; Emelyanenko, K.A.; Vasiliev, A.L.; Emelyanenko, A.M. Combination of functional nanoengineering and nanosecond laser texturing for design of superhydrophobic aluminum alloy with exceptional mechanical and chemical properties. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 10113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Anitha, C.; Azim, S.S.; Mayavan, S. Salvinia inspired fluroine free superhydrophobic coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 449, 250–260. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu, Y.H.; Zhao, W.J.; Wang, W.R.; Sui, W.J. Fabricating binary anti-corrosion structures containing superhydrophobic surfaces and sturdy barrier layers for Al alloys. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 5100–5110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wei, Z.B.; Jiang, D.Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.G. Combination of chemical etching and electrophoretic deposition for the fabrication of multi-scale superhydrophobic Al films. Mater. Lett. 2017, 196, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, J.Y.; Lu, S.X.; Xu, W.G.; He, G.; Yu, T.L.; Cheng, Y.Y.; Wu, B. Fabrication of stable Ni-Al4Ni3-Al2O3 superhydrophobic surface on aluminum substrate for self-cleaning, anti-corrosive and catalytic performance. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 1097–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saravanan, G.; Mohan, S. Formation of silver nanorod arrays in an anodised aluminium oxide membrane. Trans. IMF 2015, 93, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sasaki, K.; Tenjimbayashi, M.; Manabe, K.; Shiratori, S. Asymmetric superhydrophobic/superhydrophilic cotton fabrics designed by spraying polymer and nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, X.; Zhu, W.Z.; He, G.J.; Zhang, P.Y.; Zhang, Z.J.; Parkin, I.P. Flexible and mechanically robust superhydrophobic silicone surfaces with stable Cassie-Baxter state. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 14180–14186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, X.W.; Shi, T.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Q.X.; Huang, X.J. Multifunctional substrate of Al alloy based on general hierarchical micro/nanostructures: Superamphiphobicity and enhanced corrosion resistance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (ac) SEM images of deposited Al alloys; (d) the growth process diagram of dendrites on Al alloy substrate.
Figure 1. (ac) SEM images of deposited Al alloys; (d) the growth process diagram of dendrites on Al alloy substrate.
Metals 08 00960 g001
Figure 2. (a) EDX, mapping and (b) XRD analyses of deposited surface.
Figure 2. (a) EDX, mapping and (b) XRD analyses of deposited surface.
Metals 08 00960 g002
Figure 3. Apparent contact angles of (a) Al alloy substrate; (c) modified substrate; and (e) modified deposited sample; (b) optical photo of a drop (20 μL) on Al alloy substrate. Sliding angles of (d) modified substrate and (f) modified deposited sample.
Figure 3. Apparent contact angles of (a) Al alloy substrate; (c) modified substrate; and (e) modified deposited sample; (b) optical photo of a drop (20 μL) on Al alloy substrate. Sliding angles of (d) modified substrate and (f) modified deposited sample.
Metals 08 00960 g003
Figure 4. (a) Interfacial relationships of modified deposited sample (SH-sample); (b) optical photo of a drop on SH-sample; (c) effectof exposure time in air onthe wettability of the SH-sample.
Figure 4. (a) Interfacial relationships of modified deposited sample (SH-sample); (b) optical photo of a drop on SH-sample; (c) effectof exposure time in air onthe wettability of the SH-sample.
Metals 08 00960 g004
Figure 5. (a) Potentiodynamic polarization curves of Al alloy substrate, modified substrate (H-sample) and modified deposited sample (SH-sample); (b) consistency analysis of polarization tests for various samples.
Figure 5. (a) Potentiodynamic polarization curves of Al alloy substrate, modified substrate (H-sample) and modified deposited sample (SH-sample); (b) consistency analysis of polarization tests for various samples.
Metals 08 00960 g005
Figure 6. Nyquist plots of Al alloy substrate, modified substrate (H-sample) and modified deposited sample (SH-sample). The inserts referring to equivalent circuit patterns of the substrate and modified samples.
Figure 6. Nyquist plots of Al alloy substrate, modified substrate (H-sample) and modified deposited sample (SH-sample). The inserts referring to equivalent circuit patterns of the substrate and modified samples.
Metals 08 00960 g006
Figure 7. Interfacial relationships of (a) Al alloy substrate, (b) modified substrate (H-sample) and (c) modified deposited sample (SH-sample).
Figure 7. Interfacial relationships of (a) Al alloy substrate, (b) modified substrate (H-sample) and (c) modified deposited sample (SH-sample).
Metals 08 00960 g007
Figure 8. Effects of immersion time in seawater on (a) wettabilities and (b) corrosion resistances of the modified deposited sample.
Figure 8. Effects of immersion time in seawater on (a) wettabilities and (b) corrosion resistances of the modified deposited sample.
Metals 08 00960 g008
Table 1. Fitted electrochemical parameters (Δ referring to fitting error) of Al alloy substrate (Sample 1), modified substrate (Sample 2) and modified deposited sample (Sample 3).
Table 1. Fitted electrochemical parameters (Δ referring to fitting error) of Al alloy substrate (Sample 1), modified substrate (Sample 2) and modified deposited sample (Sample 3).
SampleRs (Ω·cm2)Δ (%)Rct (Ω·cm2)Δ (%)Rc (Ω·cm2)Δ (%)W (Ω·cm2)Δ (%)Ydl (μF·cm−2)Δ (%)Yc (μF·cm−2)Δ (%)
1111.214282.5----61.73.4--
283.333061.93313.80.0085.315.24.621.92.3
3100.863741.73905.50.0257.04.28.33.86.1

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Shi, T.; Li, B.; Zhang, C.; Zhong, B.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, Q. One-Step Preparation of Super-Hydrophobic Micro-Nano Dendrites on Al Alloy for Enhanced Corrosion Resistance. Metals 2018, 8, 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8110960

AMA Style

Li X, Shi T, Li B, Zhang C, Zhong B, Lv Y, Zhang Q. One-Step Preparation of Super-Hydrophobic Micro-Nano Dendrites on Al Alloy for Enhanced Corrosion Resistance. Metals. 2018; 8(11):960. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8110960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xuewu, Tian Shi, Ben Li, Chuanwei Zhang, Bin Zhong, Yuan Lv, and Qiaoxin Zhang. 2018. "One-Step Preparation of Super-Hydrophobic Micro-Nano Dendrites on Al Alloy for Enhanced Corrosion Resistance" Metals 8, no. 11: 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8110960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop