Next Article in Journal
Separation Strategies for Indium Recovery: Exploring Solvent Extraction, Ion-Exchange, and Membrane Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Accelerated Optimization of Superalloys by Integrating Thermodynamic Calculation Data with Machine Learning Models: A Reference Alloy Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Finite Element Analysis for Restraint Intensity and Welding Residual Stress of the Lehigh Specimen Made of Ti80 Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Effect of the Welding Electrode Geometry on the Peak Load, Energy Absorption, Fracture Type, and Microstructure of Resistance Spot-Welded Dissimilar Ultra-High Strength MS1500 and SPFC590 Steels

by
Mehmet Okan Görtan
1,* and
Ümit Türkmen
2
1
Mechanical Engineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
2
Rokeron Otomotiv A.S., Kocaeli 41455, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2026, 16(2), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/met16020155
Submission received: 7 December 2025 / Revised: 7 January 2026 / Accepted: 13 January 2026 / Published: 27 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Welding Processes of Metallic Materials—2nd Edition)

Abstract

In the present study, the effects of electrode geometry and welding current on the tensile-shear strength, failure energy, fracture type, and joint microstructure were investigated during the RSW of ultra-high-strength MS1500 steel to high-strength low-alloy SPFC590 steel, both 1.2 mm in thickness. Three electrode geometries—designated as G0-6 mm, G0-8 mm, and A0—recommended for 1.2 mm sheets according to ISO 5821 were examined. It was found that in the G0-6 mm electrode geometry, which has the smallest contact area, excessive expulsion occurred at lower current levels compared to the other geometries. Consequently, this configuration resulted in lower maximum tensile-shear strength and failure energy values. The highest mechanical performance was achieved with the G0-8 mm electrode geometry, where the tensile-shear strength and failure energy were measured as 19.42 kN and 43.81 J, respectively. For the A0 electrode, although the maximum tensile-shear strength (19.68 kN) was comparable to that of the G0-8 mm geometry, the failure energy was approximately 7% lower (40.94 J). For all electrode geometries corresponding to maximum mechanical strength, a pull-out failure mode was observed, where the nugget region of the SPFC590 steel detached from the base metal and remained adhered to the ultra-high-strength MS1500 sheet.
Keywords: resistance spot welding; ultra-high-strength steel; tensile-shear strength resistance spot welding; ultra-high-strength steel; tensile-shear strength

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Görtan, M.O.; Türkmen, Ü. Effect of the Welding Electrode Geometry on the Peak Load, Energy Absorption, Fracture Type, and Microstructure of Resistance Spot-Welded Dissimilar Ultra-High Strength MS1500 and SPFC590 Steels. Metals 2026, 16, 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16020155

AMA Style

Görtan MO, Türkmen Ü. Effect of the Welding Electrode Geometry on the Peak Load, Energy Absorption, Fracture Type, and Microstructure of Resistance Spot-Welded Dissimilar Ultra-High Strength MS1500 and SPFC590 Steels. Metals. 2026; 16(2):155. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16020155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Görtan, Mehmet Okan, and Ümit Türkmen. 2026. "Effect of the Welding Electrode Geometry on the Peak Load, Energy Absorption, Fracture Type, and Microstructure of Resistance Spot-Welded Dissimilar Ultra-High Strength MS1500 and SPFC590 Steels" Metals 16, no. 2: 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16020155

APA Style

Görtan, M. O., & Türkmen, Ü. (2026). Effect of the Welding Electrode Geometry on the Peak Load, Energy Absorption, Fracture Type, and Microstructure of Resistance Spot-Welded Dissimilar Ultra-High Strength MS1500 and SPFC590 Steels. Metals, 16(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16020155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop