Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
MetalsMetals
  • Article
  • Open Access

24 May 2025

19 Pages

Predictive Capability Evaluation of Micrograph-Driven Deep Learning for Ti6Al4V Alloy Tensile Strength Under Varied Preprocessing Strategies

and
1
Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
2
Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission and Manufacturing Engineering of Hubei Province, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
3
Precision Manufacturing Institute, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a micrograph-driven model for Ti6Al4V mechanical property prediction through integrated image preprocessing and deep learning, reducing the reliance on manually extracted features and process parameters. This paper systematically evaluates the capability of a CNN model using preprocessed micrographs to predict Ti6Al4V alloy ultimate tensile strength (UTS), while analyzing how different preprocessing combinations influence model performance. A total of 180 micrographs were selected from published literature to construct the dataset. After applying image standardization (grayscale transformation, resizing, and normalization) and image enhancement, a pre-trained ResNet34 model was employed with transfer learning to conduct strength grade classification (low, medium, high) and UTS regression. The results demonstrated that on highly heterogeneous micrograph datasets, the model exhibited moderate classification capability (maximum accuracy = 65.60% ± 1.22%) but negligible UTS regression capability (highest R2 = 0.163 ± 0.020). Fine-tuning on subsets with consistent forming processes improved regression performance (highest R2 = 0.360 ± 1.47 × 10−5), outperforming traditional predictive models (highest R2 = 0.148). The classification model was insensitive to normalization methods, while min–max normalization with center-cropping showed optimal standardization for regression (R2 = 0.111 ± 0.017). Gamma correction maximized classification accuracy, whereas histogram equalization achieved the highest improvement for regression.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.