Next Article in Journal
Progress on Electrodeposition of Metals and Alloys Using Ionic Liquids as Electrolytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of Process Parameters on Solidification Structure and Centre Grain Size of 2311 in 420 mm Extra-Thick Continuously Cast Slabs
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological Characteristics and Printing Mechanisms of Grid Lines by Laser-Induced Forward Transfer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formation and Removal Mechanism of Nonmetallic Inclusions in 42CrMo4 Steel during the Steelmaking Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evolution and Formation of Non-Metallic Inclusions during Electroslag Remelting of Ce-Bearing 15Cr-22Ni-1Nb Austenitic Heat-Resistant Steel

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2022, 12(12), 2094; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122094
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inclusion Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
The evolution of inclusions in austenitic heat-resistant steel with different Ce content during protective argon gas atmosphere electroslag remelting (ESR) was studied. All oxide inclusions in the Ce-free consumable electrode are MgO·Al2O3. A part of these MgO·Al2O3 inclusions was removed before metal droplets entered the liquid metal pool during the ESR. The soluble oxygen (arising from the reoxidation) reacted with soluble aluminum, calcium, and magnesium in liquid steel to form MgO·Al2O3 and CaO–Al2O3 inclusions in liquid steel. All oxide inclusions in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce are Ce2O2S. A portion of these Ce2O2S inclusions was dissociated into soluble oxygen, cerium, and sulfur in liquid steel during the ESR process, whereas the others were removed by absorbing them into molten slag. The oxide inclusions in the liquid metal pool and remelted ingot were Ce2O3, CeAlO3, and Ce2O2S. The CeAlO3 and Ce2O3 inclusions were reoxidation products formed by the chemical reaction between the soluble oxygen, soluble aluminum, and cerium. The oxide inclusions in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce are CeS and Ce2O2S. These CeS inclusions were removed by molten slag adsorption during the ESR. A part of these Ce2O2S inclusions was removed by slag adsorption, and the remaining entered into the liquid metal pool. The oxide inclusions in the liquid metal pool and the ingot were Ce2O3 and Ce2O2S. The Ce2O3 inclusions were formed through the chemical reaction between the soluble oxygen and cerium in the liquid metal pool. The Ce2O2S inclusions in the liquid pool originate from reoxidation products during the ESR process and the relics from the electrode.

1. Introduction

Austenitic heat-resistant steel of Ni-Cr system is extensively utilized in automotive engines and fossil fuel power generation plants applications at moderately elevated temperatures, such as fasteners and bolts, and heat exchangers, because of their superior strength, toughness, oxidation resistance, and organizational stability [1,2,3]. Except the advantages of some types of fine non-metallic inclusions through acting as the nucleation sites to generate intragranular acicular ferrites and the pinning particles to inhibit the growth of austenite grains [4], inclusions are generally detrimental to mechanical properties of steel, such as creep strength, fatigue strength, corrosion resistance, tensile properties, toughness, and ductility [5,6,7,8,9,10]. The local stress concentration induced by large inclusions often causes cracking at inclusion-steel matrix interface during working of steel [11]. The detriment degree of inclusions is strongly dependent on their number density, size, and chemical compositions.
Rare earth Ce can improve the corrosion resistance [12,13], oxidation resistance [14,15], grain refinement [16,17] and reduction of dendritic spacing [18,19] of heat-resistant steels and improve the mechanical properties of austenitic heat-resistant steels [20,21]. The generation of Ce-bearing non-metallic inclusions in Ce-containing steel was unavoidable. Ce-containing inclusions were detrimental to the fatigue strength, toughness and ductility, impact strength, tensile properties, corrosion resistance, initiation of fatigue cracking, and stress concentration cracking of steel [22,23,24]. Many studies on the evolution of Ce-bearing inclusions have been conducted in industrial-scale secondary refining (LF and RH refining) or laboratory-scale crucible experiments of slag-steel reactions [25,26]. However, no studies have been reported on the evolution of Ce-bearing inclusions in the ESR process.
In the current study, the evolution of inclusions in the steel with different Ce contents during ESR was investigated. The effect of reoxidation during the ESR on inclusion evolution was ascertained. The evolution mechanism of Ce-bearing inclusions during the ESR was elucidated.

2. Experimental

2.1. ESR Experimental Procedure

The chemical compositions of the consumable electrodes are shown in Table 1. The oxide scale on the electrode steel surface was thoroughly removed before ESR experiments. The pre-melted slag (40.92 mass% CaF2, 27.09 mass% CaO, 0.52 mass% MgO, 29.02 mass% Al2O3, 0.92 mass% SiO2, 0.21 mass% FeO) was roasted at 700 °C (973 K) for 8 h to remove moisture before the ESR trials.
Three ESR trials were conducted in protective argon gas atmosphere. The operating current, voltage, and outlet temperature of the mold cooling water were maintained at about 2500 A, 32 V, and 313 k. During electroslag remelting of the steel electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce, Al shots were added for deoxidation (addition amount: 1 kg/ton of steel). For deoxidation in ESR trial T3, Al shots were added (2 kg/ton of steel) during the ESR of the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce. A steel sample was taken from the liquid metal pool during the ESR refining using a vacuum sampling tube made of quartz, followed by quenching in water. The remelted ingots corresponding to the ESR trials T1, T2, and T3 were designated as ingots C1, C2, and C3, respectively.

2.2. Compositional Analysis and Inclusions Characterization

The steel samples were taken from the consumable electrodes and the remelted ingots of the ESR for chemical composition analysis. The total oxygen (composed of both the soluble oxygen and the oxygen bonded as oxide inclusions) content of the steel was measured by the inert gas fusion-infrared absorptiometry. The sulfur and carbon contents of the steel were measured by the combustion-infrared absorption technique. The nitrogen content was determined by the inert gas fusion-thermal conductivity method. The contents of soluble aluminum, total calcium, magnesium, silicon, cerium, and manganese in the electrodes and ingots were measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES).
Steel samples for metallographic observation were taken the consumable electrodes and the mid-height of each remelted ingot at the mid-radius position. To reveal the evolution of inclusions in the ESR process, steel samples collected from the liquid metal pool with vacuum sampling tubes were polished after mechanical grinding. Inclusions exposed on the cross-section of the polished sample were analyzed in terms of their chemistry, size, and morphology by scanning electron microscope (SEM; FEI Quanta-250, FEI Corp, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-Ray spectrometer (EDS, XFlash 5030; Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany).
Furthermore, the size of inclusions on the polished sample cross-section was calculated using the equivalent circle diameter (ECD). The equivalent circle diameter of the inclusions smaller than 1 μm is not included in analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Steel Composition

The chemical compositions of remelted ingots are shown in Table 2. The Ce contents of the remelted ingots C2 and C3 are 0.0055 mass% and 0.063 mass%, respectively. The yields of Ce during the ESR are 34.4% and 21.0%, respectively.
The aluminum content of the steel increases from 0.15 mass% in the Ce-free electrode to 0.19 mass% in the remelted ingot C1. The aluminum content of steel in the ESR trial T2 increases from 0.10 mass% in the consumable electrode to 0.23 mass% in the ingot C2. The aluminum content of the steel in the ESR trial T3.
The slag-steel reactions during the ESR are a potential source of soluble aluminum pickup in liquid steel. The chemical reaction between Ce in liquid steel and Al2O3 in the slag can be expressed as follows [27]:
2[Ce] + (Al2O3)slag = (Ce2O3)slag + 2[Al]
Δ G o = 205703 + 34 T   ( J / mol )
K = a Al 2 a C e 2 O 3 a Ce 2 a A l 2 O 3 = ( f Al [ % Al ] ) 2 a C e 2 O 3 ( f Ce [ % Ce ] ) 2 a Al 2 O 3
where a C e 2 O 3 and a A l 2 O 3 are the activities of Ce2O3 and Al2O3 in the slag, respectively. f Al and f Ce are the activity coefficients of soluble aluminum and Ce in the liquid alloy, respectively, which can be calculated by the following equation [28].
lg f i = e i j [ % j ]
where e i j is the first-order interaction parameter.
The activities of the Al2O3 and Ce2O3 relative to pure solid standard states in the slag melts at 1873 K (1600 °C) are estimated with FactSage 8.0 (FToxid database; ThermFact/CRCT, Montreal, Canada). According to the chemical composition of the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce combined with the first-order interaction parameters (as shown in Table 3), the Gibbs free energy change for the chemical reaction (1) was calculated to be 312.89 kJ/mol. It suggests that Ce in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce cannot reduce the Al2O3 in the slag during the ESR process, leading to the Al pickup in the steel. The Al pickup in liquid steel is caused by the Al addition in the ESR process.
In the present study, the oxygen contents of the electrodes with different Ce contents apparently increase during the ESR to 0.0016 mass%, 0.0013 mass%, and 0.0018 mass% in ingots C1, C2, and C3, respectively. It indicates that the reoxidation of the liquid steel occurred in these three ESR trials. The sulfur contents of steel decrease during the ESR to 0.0007 mass%, 0.0007 mass%, and 0.0016 mass% in ingots C1, C2, and C3, respectively.
The difference in the oxygen potential between liquid steel with low oxygen content and the molten slag contributes to soluble oxygen pickup in liquid steel during the protective argon gas atmosphere ESR [33]. The introduction of FeO (newly formed FeO during ESR and the unremoved oxide layer on the surface of the electrode steel) to the molten slag pool during ESR is difficult to be prevented, and it is the source of the increased oxygen content of liquid steel according to the chemical reaction (FeO)slag = [Fe] + [O] (ΔGo = −139,000 + 57.1T (J/mol)) [34].
The interaction coefficients used in the present calculation are shown in Table 3. The Gibbs free energy change for the chemical reaction (FeO)slag = [Fe] + [O] for the ESR trials T1, T2, and T3 was calculated to be −102.75 kJ/mL, −105.99 kJ/mL, and −100.92 kJ/mL, respectively. It indicates that FeO in molten slag transfers oxygen to liquid steel, resulting in the reoxidation of liquid steel during ESR. Meanwhile, the desulfurization reaction (CaO) + [S] = (CaS)slag + [O] is also an important source of soluble oxygen pickup in the liquid steel during the ESR [35].

3.2. Inclusions in Consumable Steel Electrode

The SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the consumable electrodes are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5. As shown in Figure 1, the typical inclusions in the Ce-free electrode are (Ti,Nb)N, MgO·Al2O3 inclusions surrounded by (Ti,Nb)N and MgO·Al2O3 inclusions, respectively. Figure 1a shows typical (Ti,Nb)N inclusions in the electrode with near-square shape. Figure 1c,d show typical MgO·Al2O3 inclusions in Ce-free electrode, and the morphology of these spinel inclusions is nearly spherical. The MgO·Al2O3 spinel inclusion plays a nucleation role for (Ti,Nb)N.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the typical inclusions in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce. The observed inclusions are (Ti,Nb)N, and Ce2O2S, respectively. Figure 2a shows typical inclusions (Ti,Nb)N in the consumable electrode with a clear angular shape. Figure 2b,c show the typical inclusions of Ce2O2S in the consumable electrode, showing both near spherical or irregular morphologies.
The typical inclusions in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The rare-earth inclusions in the electrode are identified as CeS and Ce2O2S, respectively. It can be seen from SEM photographs that these inclusions are near-spherical. It is found from ESD element mappings of the Ce2O2S inclusion that the elements are uniformly distributed on cross-section of the inclusions.

3.3. Inclusions in the Liquid Metal Pool and Remelted Ingots

The SEM micrographs, EDS spectra, and elemental mappings of typical inclusions observed in the liquid metal pool during the ESR trial T1 and remelted ingot C1 are shown in Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9. The inclusions in the liquid metal pool of the ESR trial T1 are (Ti,Nb)N, MgO·Al2O3 inclusions wrapped by (Ti,Nb)N, CaO–Al2O3, and MgO·Al2O3.
Four types of inclusions are found in ingot C1, namely (Ti,Nb)N inclusions, MgO·Al2O3 inclusions wrapped by (Ti,Nb)N, CaO–Al2O3, and MgO·Al2O3. Figure 7 and Figure 9 show the EDS element mappings of CaO–Al2O3 inclusions in the liquid metal pool of the ESR trial T1 and remelted ingot C1, respectively. CaO and Al2O3 are uniformly distributed over the entire cross-section of the inclusion.
SEM micrographs, EDS spectra, and elemental mappings of typical inclusions in the liquid metal pool of ESR trial T2 and remelted ingot are shown in Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13. The types of inclusions in the liquid metal pool of the ESR trial T2 are (Ti,Nb)N, Ce2O2S, and CeAlO3 encapsulated by (Ti,Nb)N, CeAlO3, and Ce2O3. The types of inclusions are (Ti,Nb)N, Ce2O2S, CeAlO3 surrounded by (Ti,Nb)N, and Ce2O3. It is observed that the types of inclusions in the remelted ingot did not change compared to the types of inclusions in the liquid metal pool.
Typical inclusions in the liquid metal pool and remelted ingot for the ESR trial T3 are shown in Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17. The two types of rare earth inclusions in the liquid metal pool of the ESR trial T3 are observed to be Ce2O3 and Ce2O2S, and the morphology of these rare-earth inclusions is near-spherical. The results of the elements mappings of Ce2O2S inclusions in the liquid metal pool of ESR trial T3 and remelted ingot are shown in Figure 11 and Figure 13, respectively.

3.4. Size Distribution and Types of Inclusions

Most of inclusions in the Ce-free electrode are 2 to 5 μm in size (accounting for 72% in number proportion), followed by the inclusions larger than 5 μm (21% in the relative fraction), and the number proportion of the inclusion smaller than 2 μm is 7%. The size of inclusions in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce is 2 to 5 μm (accounting for 92% in number proportion). The number proportion of inclusions in the size range of 1 μm to 2 μm and the inclusions larger than 5 μm are 6% and 2%, respectively. The proportion of the inclusions in the size range of 1 μm to 2 μm in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce is 88%, and the number proportion of inclusions between 2 and 5 μm is 12%.
Figure 18 shows the size distribution of inclusions in liquid metal pools and remelted ingots with different Ce contents. The proportion of inclusions smaller than 2 μm in the liquid metal pool of ESR trial T1 is 67%. The proportion of the number of inclusions occupied between 2 μm and 5 μm is 31%. The size of inclusions smaller than 2 μm in ingot C1 decreased to 34%, and inclusions between 2 and 5 μm increased to 61%. The proportion of the number of inclusions in the size range of 1 μm to 2 μm in the liquid metal pool of the ESR trial T2 is 75%, and the proportion of the number of inclusions occupied between 2 and 5 μm is 25%. The proportion of inclusions in the size range of 1 μm to 2 μm in the remelted ingot decreased to 71%, and the proportion of inclusions in the size range of 2 to 5 μm increased to 27%. The proportion of inclusions larger than 5 μm is 2%. The proportion of inclusions in the liquid pool of the ESR trial T3 remained almost unchanged compared to the remelted ingot C3.
Figure 19 shows the distribution of inclusions types in electrodes, liquid metal pools, and remelted ingots with different Ce contents. All inclusions in the Ce-free electrode are identified as MgO·Al2O3. The type of inclusions in the liquid metal pool of the ESR trial T1 has changed compared to the electrode. The newly formed CaO–Al2O3 inclusions in the liquid metal pool account for 6% in the number proportion. The proportion of CaO–Al2O3 inclusions in the ingot account for 49% of the total inclusions.
The rare earth oxide inclusions in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce are identified as Ce2O2S. The rare earth oxide inclusions present in the liquid metal pool of ESR trial T2 are identified as Ce2O3, CeAlO3, and Ce2O2S, accounting for 51%, 7%, and 42% in the number proportion, respectively. The Ce2O3 and CeAlO3 inclusions are newly formed in the liquid metal pool. The proportion of Ce2O3 inclusions in the liquid metal pool and ingot reduce from 51% to 28% and CeAlO3 inclusions increased from 7% to 39%. The Ce2O2S inclusions are reduced to 33% in the number proportion after ESR.
The CeS inclusions are completely removed and Ce2O3 inclusions are newly formed in the trial T3 during ESR. The proportion of Ce2O3 and Ce2O2S inclusions in the liquid metal pool is 46% and 54%, respectively. The relative proportions of inclusions in the remelted ingot (43% Ce2O3 and 57% Ce2O2S) do not change significantly compared to the metal pool.

3.5. Evolution Mechanism of Inclusions during Remelted Remelting

In the present study, thermodynamic calculation is performed for understanding the evolution of inclusions during the ESR with FactSage 8.0 (FSstel, FactPS, and FToxid database). Figure 20 and Figure 21 show the transformation of inclusions precipitation with temperature for electrodes with different Ce content and remelted ingots C1, C2, and C3, respectively.
According to the above experimental observations, no other types of oxide inclusions are observed in the Ce-free electrodes except for MgAl2O4 inclusions. The temperature of the liquid metal film steel at the electrode tip is close to the liquidus temperature during ESR [36,37]. The results showed that the part of MgAl2O4 inclusions are removed by the adsorption of the molten slag, and the remaining is not removed and entered into the liquid metal pool.
The predicted inclusions transformation with respect to the temperature in the electrodes is present in Figure 20. The Ce2O3 inclusions are already formed when the liquid steel temperature at 1800 °C. The Ce2O3 inclusions gradually precipitate out as the temperature decrease. when the temperature decreases to 1669 °C, the mass fraction of Ce2O3 inclusions decrease sharply, and the mass fraction of Ce2O2S inclusions increases sharply. The precipitation rate of Ce2O2S inclusions become slow when the temperature of the liquid steel decreases to 1593 °C. According to the thermodynamic calculation, the inclusion in the electrode containing 0.016 mass% Ce is mainly Ce2O2S, which is consistent with the experimental results.
It suggested that Ce2O2S inclusions dissociated into liquid steel as soluble oxygen, sulfur, and cerium as the liquid metal films formed on the downside of the electrode tip and collected into liquid metal droplets subsequently during ESR, whereas the others do not dissociate into liquid steel. Experimental results show that the Ce2O2S inclusions are not completely removed. The removal of these Ce2O2S inclusions is attributed to the dissociation of a portion of these original oxide inclusions into liquid steel and the absorption of the others by the molten slag phase during the ESR process.
The predicted inclusion transformation with respect to the temperature in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce is present in Figure 20b. The amount of the CeS inclusions is higher than that of Ce2O2S inclusions. The present thermodynamic calculation supports the above theoretical analysis of oxide inclusions formation and the experimental observations of oxide inclusions in the electrodes.
The electrode tip is heated to near the liquidus temperature of the steel during the ESR. As shown in Figure 20b, CeS and Ce2O2S inclusions in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce do not dissociate into liquid steel as soluble elements. The experimental results show that CeS inclusions are fully removed by the adsorption of the molten slag before liquid metal droplets collect in the liquid metal pool. According to the results of the experiment, a portion of the Ce2O2S inclusions are removed and the remaining enters into the liquid metal pool. The removal of these Ce2O2S inclusions is attributed to the absorption of the molten slag during the ESR process.
The predicted inclusions transformation with respect to the temperature in the remelted ingot C1 is present in Figure 21a. The liquid inclusions start to precipitate in the liquid steel at 1690 °C. As the temperature decreases, the mass fraction of liquid inclusions increases sharply. The precipitation rate of liquid inclusions slows down at which point MgAl2O4 inclusions begin to precipitate when the temperature is reduced to 1647 °C. When the temperature is reduced to 1574 °C, the mass fraction of liquid inclusions decreases and CaAl4O7 inclusions start to precipitate. Figure 21b shows the variation of the mass fraction of each component in the liquid inclusions with temperature. It can be seen from Figure 21b that the liquid inclusions consist of Al2O3, MgO, and CaO, in which Al2O3 is dominant in the mass fraction.
As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, the reoxidation of liquid steel occurs during the ESR process of trial T1. Thereafter, soluble oxygen reacts with calcium, aluminum and magnesium to form CaAl4O7 and MgAl2O4 inclusions in the liquid metal pool during the ESR.
All oxide inclusions in the Ce-free electrode were identified as MgAl2O4. The types of inclusions in the liquid metal pool after ESR are MgAl2O4 (accounting for 94% in number proportion) and CaAl4O7 (6% in number proportion). The proportion of these two types of inclusions in the remelted ingot C1 is 61% and 39%, respectively. Thermodynamic calculations support the above analysis of oxide inclusions in the remelted ingot C1.
The predicted inclusions transformation with respect to the temperature in the ingot C2 is present in Figure 21c. The Ce2O3 inclusions already form at 1800 °C in the liquid steel, and Ce2O3 inclusions precipitate slowly as the temperature gradually decreases. The mass fraction of Ce2O3 inclusions decreases rapidly at 1659 °C, and CeAlO3 inclusions start to form in the liquid steel.
As listed in Table 1 and Table 2, the changes in oxygen content before and after the ESR show that reoxidation of liquid steel occurred in the trial T2 during the ESR. The soluble oxygen inside the liquid metal pool during trial T2 ESR steel reacts with cerium 2[Ce] + 3[O] = Ce2O3(s) (ΔGo = −1431120 + 121T (J/mol)) [38] to form Ce2O3 and the Gibbs free energy change of the reaction to −14.56 kJ/mol. Once the soluble oxygen pickup takes place in liquid metal pool (arising from the reoxidation), the soluble oxygen reacts with soluble aluminum and cerium in liquid metal pool to form CeAlO3 inclusions, [Ce] + [Al] + 3[O] = CeAlO3(s) (ΔGo = −1366460 + 364T (J/mol)) [39] with a Gibbs free energy change of −41.47 kJ/mol. The present thermodynamic calculation supports the above analysis of oxide inclusions formation and the experimental observations of oxide inclusions in the liquid metal pool and ingots.
The predicted inclusions transformation with respect to the temperature in ingot C3 with respect to the temperature is present in Figure 21d. The Ce2O3 inclusions are already formed at 1800 °C. When the temperature is reduced to 1781 °C, the mass fraction of Ce2O3 inclusions starts to decrease in the liquid steel and the Ce2O2S inclusions start to precipitate in the liquid steel.
The change of oxygen content in Table 1 and Table 2 shows that reoxidation of liquid steel occurs during ESR. The reoxidation of liquid steel leads to considerable pickup of soluble oxygen during ESR, which provides a driving force for the generation of Ce2O3 inclusions. 2[Ce] + 3[O] = Ce2O3(s) (ΔGo = −1431120 + 121T (J/mol)), the Gibbs free energy change is −142.37 kJ/mol. Soluble oxygen in the liquid metal pool reacts with soluble sulfur and cerium 2[Ce] + 2[O] + [S] = Ce2O2S(s) (ΔGo = −1353590 + 332T (J/mol)) [40] to form Ce2O2S inclusions. The Gibbs free energy change is −158.85 kJ/mol. According to the experimental results, the Ce2O2S inclusions in the electrode cannot be removed completely, the Ce2O2S inclusions in the liquid metal pool originate from reoxidation inside the liquid metal pool and the original inclusions that has not been removed. The thermodynamic calculations results are consistent with the experimental observations and analysis of the formation of oxide inclusions in the liquid metal pool and remelted ingot.
The liquid steel solidification progresses in a is non-equilibrium state during the ESR practice, which leads to insufficient solute diffusion in solid [41,42]. The evolution of inclusions during the solidification of liquid steel with different Ce contents is calculated using the non-equilibrium module (Scheil-Gulliver model) of the thermodynamic software FactSage 8.0.
As shown in Figure 22a, MgAl2O4 and CaAl4O7 inclusions are formed at the high-temperature stage (around 1600 °C). The mass fraction of oxide inclusions forms at temperatures below the liquidus temperature of the steel is virtually nothing during the solidification process. Figure 22b shows that the Ce2O3 inclusions already formed at 1600 °C in the liquid steel. The mass fraction of Ce2O3 inclusions no longer changes as the temperature decreases. When the temperature reaches to 1600 °C, CeAlO3 inclusions are formed in liquid steel and the mass fraction of oxide inclusions does not change when the temperature is reduced to 1449 °C. At the temperature below the liquidus temperature of the steel, the mass fraction of oxide inclusions does not change. As shown in Figure 22c, the Ce2O3 and Ce2O2S inclusions are formed at 1600 °C in liquid steel. As the temperature of liquid steel decreases, the mass fraction of Ce2O3 and Ce2O2S inclusions no longer change.
As shown in Figure 22, amount of individual type of oxide inclusions does not change during liquid steel solidification. It can be learned that no fresh oxide inclusions are generated during the solidification of liquid steel. The types of inclusions in the liquid metal pools of the ESR trials T1, T2, and T3 are the same as those in the remelted ingots. This is consistent with the experimental observations. The differences in the number proportions of different types of inclusions between liquid metal pool and remelted ingot are attributed to the removal through floatation before full solidification of liquid steel during the ESR.

4. Conclusions

  • The Al pickup in the steel is caused by the Al addition for deoxidation during the ESR process, rather than the reduction of Al2O3 in the slag by Ce. The soluble oxygen pickup is generated in liquid steel due to the decomposition of FeO in the slag and desulfurization during the protective argon gas atmosphere ESR.
  • The oxide inclusions in Ce-free electrode are MgO·Al2O3, part of which are removed by molten slag absorption during the ESR. The oxide inclusions in liquid metal pool are mainly MgO·Al2O3 and CaO–Al2O3 (6% in number fraction). The soluble oxygen that arising from reoxidation of liquid steel during the ESR react with soluble calcium and aluminum to form CaO–Al2O3 inclusions. MgO·Al2O3 inclusions are originated from reoxidation products and the relics from the electrode.
  • The oxide inclusions in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce are Ce2O2S. Part of Ce2O2S inclusions are removed during ESR in two ways: (I) dissociated into soluble oxygen and soluble elements in liquid steel, (II) absorbed by molten slag. The oxide inclusions in the liquid metal pool are Ce2O3, CeAlO3, and Ce2O2S. CeAlO3 inclusions are reoxidation product, and Ce2O2S inclusions are the relics from the electrode. The proportions of Ce2O3, CeAlO3 and Ce2O2S inclusions in ingot are 28%, 39%, and 33%, respectively.
  • The rare-earth inclusions in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce are Ce2O2S and CeS. The CeS inclusions are fully removed during ESR. Part of Ce2O2S inclusions are removed by slag adsorption. The oxide inclusions in liquid metal pool are Ce2O3 (reoxidation products, 46% in number proportion) and Ce2O2S (54% in number fraction). Ce2O2S inclusions in liquid metal pool are originated from the relics of electrode and reoxidation products. The proportion of Ce2O3 and Ce2O2S inclusions in remelted ingots are 43% and 57%, respectively.
  • No fresh oxide inclusions are generated during the solidification of liquid steel. The differences in the number proportions of different types of inclusions between liquid metal pool and remelted ingot are attributed to the removal through floatation before full solidification of liquid steel during the ESR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.; methodology, Z.W. and X.Z.; formal analysis, Z.W. and C.S.; investigation, Z.W. and C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.W., S.W. and C.S.; writing—review and editing, C.S. and X.Z.; supervision, C.S. and J.L.; funding acquisition, C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52074027 and 51874026).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express appreciation to the National Natural Science Foundation of China for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kondrat’Ev, S.Y.; Kraposhin, V.S.; Anastasiadi, G.P.; Talis, A.L. Experimental observation and crystallographic description of M7C3 carbide transformation in Fe–Cr–Ni–C HP type alloy. Acta Mater. 2015, 100, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hedaiat, F.; Dehmolaei, R.; Khorasanian, M.; Lotfi, B. Long-term oxidation behaviour and thermal stability of heat-resistant stainless steel claddings deposited on AISI 316 stainless steel by the GTAW process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 424, 127605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mazánová, V.; Heczko, M.; Polák, J. Fatigue crack initiation and growth in 43Fe-25Ni-22.5Cr austenitic steel at a temperature of 700 °C. Int. J. Fatigue 2018, 114, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guo, H.; Yang, S.F.; Wang, T.T.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Li, J.S. Microstructure evolution and acicular ferrite nucleation in inclusion-engineered steel with modified MgO@C nanoparticle addition. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 99, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, X.; Benaarbia, A.; Allen, D.J.; Jepson, M.A.E.; Sun, W. Investigation of microstructural evolution and creep rupture behaviour of 9% Cr MarBN steel welds. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 791, 139546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Li, G.; Wang, Q.; Hui, W.; Weng, Y. On the critical inclusion size of high strength steels under ultra-high cycle fatigue. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 427, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meurling, F.; Melander, A.; Tidesten, M.; Westin, L. Influence of carbide and inclusion contents on the fatigue properties of high speed steels and tool steels. Int. J. Fatigue 2001, 23, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shibaeva, T.V.; Laurinavichyute, V.K.; Tsirlina, G.A.; Arsenkin, A.M.; Grigorovich, K.V. The effect of microstructure and non-metallic inclusions on corrosion behavior of low carbon steel in chloride containing solutions. Corros. Sci. 2014, 80, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tomita, Y. Effect of morphology of nonmetallic inclusions on tensile properties of quenched and tempered 0.4C-Cr-Mo-Ni steel. Mater. Charact. 1995, 34, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garrison, W.M.; Wojcieszynski, A.L. A discussion of the effect of inclusion volume fraction on the toughness of steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2007, 464, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, C.B.; Wang, S.J.; Li, J.; Cho, J.W. Non-metallic inclusions in electroslag remelting: A review. J. Iron Steel. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 1483–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, M.J.; Mu, S.M.; Sun, F.F.; Wang, Y. Influence of rare earth elements on microstructure and mechanical properties of cast high-speed steel rolls. J. Rare Earths 2007, 25, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, R.C.; Wang, Z.G.; He, J.G.; Zhu, F.S.; Li, C.H. Effects of rare earth elements on microstructure and mechanical properties of H13 die steel. Metals 2020, 10, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, L.M.; Du, X.J.; Gan, Y.; Liu, L.; Ye, X.N.; Jiang, L.Z. Effect of rare earths on oxidation resistance of heat resistant steel. J. Rare Earths 2010, 28, 489–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, J.Z.; Fu, P.X.; Liu, H.W.; Li, D.Z. Effects of rare earth on the microstructure and impact toughness of H13 Steel. Metals 2015, 5, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, S.C.; Yu, J.T.; Li, H.B.; Jiang, Z.H.; Geng, Y.F.; Feng, H.; Zhang, B.B.; Zhu, H.C. Refinement mechanism of cerium addition on solidification structure and sigma phase of super austenitic stainless steel S32654. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 102, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, Y.W.; Song, S.; Wang, J.W. Effect of rare earth cerium on the creep properties of modified 9Cr–1Mo heat-resistant steel. Mater. Lett. 2015, 161, 616–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, H.P.; Xiong, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Shu, Y.Y.; Zhou, Y. Investigation of RE-O-S-As inclusions in high carbon steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 2849–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.Y.; Bao, X.R.; Chen, L.; Jin, Z.L.; Ren, H.P. Rare Earth microalloied elements′ influence on the organization and capability of X65 pipeline steel. J. Rare Earths 2010, 28, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, L.; Ma, X.C.; Wang, L.M.; Ye, X.N. Effect of rare earth element yttrium addition on microstructures and properties of a 21Cr–11Ni austenitic heat-resistant stainless steel. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 2206–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Y.Y.; Wang, J.F.; Zhou, S.; Wang, X.D. Effects of rare earth addition on microstructure and mechanical properties of a Fe–15Mn–1.5Al–0.6C TWIP steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 608, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.G.; Liu, C.J. Agglomeration characteristics of various inclusions in Al-killed molten steel containing rare earth element. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2020, 51, 2585–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, Y.; Cheng, G.G.; Li, S.J.; Dai, W.X. Effect of cerium on the behavior of inclusions in H13 steel. Steel Res. Int. 2018, 89, 1800371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, H.H.; Fu, P.X.; Liu, H.W.; Cao, Y.F.; Sun, C.; Du, N.Y.; Li, D.Z. Effects of rare earth elements on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of 718H pre-hardened mold steel. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Feng, H.; Lu, P.C.; Li, H.B.; Jiang, Z.H. Effect of Mg pretreatment and Ce addition on cleanliness and inclusion evolution in high-nitrogen stainless bearing steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2022, 53, 864–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Geng, R.M.; Li, J.; Shi, C.B. Effect of Ce on inclusion evolution and HAZ mechanical properties of Al-killed high-strength steel. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2021, 48, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Geng, R.M.; Li, J.; Shi, C.B. Evolution of inclusions with Ce addition and Ca treatment in Al-killed steel during RH refining process. ISIJ Int. 2021, 61, 1506–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shi, C.B.; Yu, W.T.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Jiang, M. Simultaneous modification of alumina and MgO·Al2O3 inclusions by calcium treatment during electroslag remelting of stainless tool steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2016, 48, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, X.; Jiang, Z.H.; Geng, X.; Chen, M.J.; Cui, S. Effect of rare earth–magnesium alloy on inclusion evolution in industrial production of die steel. Steel Res. Int. 2019, 90, 1900103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shi, C.B.; Zheng, D.L.; Guo, B.S.; LI, J.; Jiang, F. Evolution of oxide–sulfide complex inclusions and its correlation with steel cleanliness during electroslag rapid remelting (ESRR) of tool steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 3390–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, S.J.; Shi, C.B.; Liang, Y.J.; Wan, X.X.; Zhu, X. Evolution and formation of non-metallic inclusions during electroslag remelting of a heat-resistant steel for ultra-supercritical power plants. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2022, 53, 3095–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gao, S.; Wang, M.; Guo, J.L.; Wang, H.; Zhi, J.G.; Bao, Y.P. Characterization transformation of inclusions using rare earth Ce treatment on Al-Killed titanium alloyed interstitial free steel. Steel Res. Int. 2019, 90, 1900194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Geng, R.M.; Li, J.; Shi, C.B.; Zhi, J.G.; Lu, B. Effect of Ce-La on inclusion evolution in Al-killed high strength steel. Metall. Res. Technol. 2020, 117, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shi, C.B.; Wang, H.; Li, J. Effects of reoxidation of liquid steel and slag composition on the chemistry evolution of inclusions during electroslag remelting. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 49, 1675–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shi, C.B. Deoxidation of electroslag remelting (ESR)—A review. ISIJ Int. 2020, 60, 1083–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, H.L.; Liu, C.J.; Jiang, M.F. Effect of rare earths on impact toughness of a low-carbon steel. Mater. Des. 2012, 33, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kruger, D.; Garbers, C.A. Characteristics and modification of non-metallic inclusions in titanium-stabilized aisi 409 ferritic stainless steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 1514–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wen, T.J.; Ren, Q.; Zhang, L.F.; Wang, J.J.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, W.; Xu, A.J. Evolution of nonmetallic inclusions during the electroslag remelting process. Steel Res. Int. 2021, 92, 2000629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ren, Q.; Zhang, L.F. Effect of cerium content on inclusions in an ultra-low-carbon aluminum-killed steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2020, 51, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adabavazeh, Z.; Hwang, W.S.; Su, Y.H. Effect of adding cerium on microstructure and morphology of Ce-based inclusions formed in low-carbon steel. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, C.B.; Zheng, X.; Yang, Z.B.; Lan, P.; Li, J.; Jiang, F. Effect of melting rate of electroslag rapid remelting (ESRR) on the microstructure and carbides in a hot work tool steel. Metals Mater. Int. 2021, 27, 3603–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Klancnik, U.; Kosec, B.; Mrvar, P.; Medved, J. Non-equilibrium solidification and microsegregation in centrifugally cast high speed steel for rolls. J. Min. Metall. B 2018, 54, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Typical inclusions in the Ce-free electrode. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) MgO·Al2O3+ (Ti,Nb)N, (c) and (d) MgO·Al2O3.
Figure 1. Typical inclusions in the Ce-free electrode. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) MgO·Al2O3+ (Ti,Nb)N, (c) and (d) MgO·Al2O3.
Metals 12 02094 g001
Figure 2. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b,c) Ce2O2S. (EDS spectrum shown in (d) corresponds to the inclusion shown in (c)).
Figure 2. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b,c) Ce2O2S. (EDS spectrum shown in (d) corresponds to the inclusion shown in (c)).
Metals 12 02094 g002
Figure 3. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce.
Figure 3. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the electrode with 0.016 mass% Ce.
Metals 12 02094 g003
Figure 4. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce. (a) CeS, (b) Ce2O2S. (EDS spectra shown in (c) and (d) correspond to the inclusions shown in (a) and (b), respectively).
Figure 4. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce. (a) CeS, (b) Ce2O2S. (EDS spectra shown in (c) and (d) correspond to the inclusions shown in (a) and (b), respectively).
Metals 12 02094 g004aMetals 12 02094 g004b
Figure 5. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce.
Figure 5. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the electrode with 0.300 mass% Ce.
Metals 12 02094 g005
Figure 6. SEM images and EDS spectra of inclusions in the liquid metal pool during ESR trial T1. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) MgO·Al2O3 + (Ti,Nb)N, (c) CaO–Al2O3, (d) MgO·Al2O3. (EDS spectrum shown in (e) corresponds to the inclusion shown in (c)).
Figure 6. SEM images and EDS spectra of inclusions in the liquid metal pool during ESR trial T1. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) MgO·Al2O3 + (Ti,Nb)N, (c) CaO–Al2O3, (d) MgO·Al2O3. (EDS spectrum shown in (e) corresponds to the inclusion shown in (c)).
Metals 12 02094 g006aMetals 12 02094 g006b
Figure 7. EDS element mappings of CaO–Al2O3 inclusion in the liquid metal pool during the ESR trial T1.
Figure 7. EDS element mappings of CaO–Al2O3 inclusion in the liquid metal pool during the ESR trial T1.
Metals 12 02094 g007
Figure 8. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions observed in ingot C1. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) MgO·Al2O3 + (Ti,Nb)N, (c) CaO–Al2O3, (d) MgO·Al2O3. (EDS spectra shown in (e) and (f) correspond to the inclusions shown in (c) and (d), respectively).
Figure 8. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions observed in ingot C1. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) MgO·Al2O3 + (Ti,Nb)N, (c) CaO–Al2O3, (d) MgO·Al2O3. (EDS spectra shown in (e) and (f) correspond to the inclusions shown in (c) and (d), respectively).
Metals 12 02094 g008
Figure 9. EDS element mappings of CaO–Al2O3 inclusion in the ingot C1.
Figure 9. EDS element mappings of CaO–Al2O3 inclusion in the ingot C1.
Metals 12 02094 g009
Figure 10. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the liquid metal pool during the ESR trial T2. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) Ce2O2S, (c) CeAlO3 + (Ti,Nb)N, (d) Ce2O3. (EDS spectra shown in (e), (f) and (g) correspond to the inclusions shown in (b), (c) and (d), respectively).
Figure 10. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the liquid metal pool during the ESR trial T2. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) Ce2O2S, (c) CeAlO3 + (Ti,Nb)N, (d) Ce2O3. (EDS spectra shown in (e), (f) and (g) correspond to the inclusions shown in (b), (c) and (d), respectively).
Metals 12 02094 g010
Figure 11. EDS element mappings of CeAlO3 and Ce2O2S inclusions in the liquid metal pool during the ESR trial T2. (a) CeAlO3 (b) Ce2O2S.
Figure 11. EDS element mappings of CeAlO3 and Ce2O2S inclusions in the liquid metal pool during the ESR trial T2. (a) CeAlO3 (b) Ce2O2S.
Metals 12 02094 g011
Figure 12. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the ingot C2. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) Ce2O2S, (c) CeAlO3 + (Ti,Nb)N, (d) Ce2O3. (EDS spectra shown in (e,f), and (g) correspond to the inclusions shown in (b,c), and (d), respectively).
Figure 12. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the ingot C2. (a) (Ti,Nb)N, (b) Ce2O2S, (c) CeAlO3 + (Ti,Nb)N, (d) Ce2O3. (EDS spectra shown in (e,f), and (g) correspond to the inclusions shown in (b,c), and (d), respectively).
Metals 12 02094 g012
Figure 13. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the ingot C2.
Figure 13. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the ingot C2.
Metals 12 02094 g013
Figure 14. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the liquid metal pool during ESR trial T3. (a) Ce2O2S, (b) Ce2O3. (EDS spectra shown in (c) and (d)correspond to the inclusions shown in (a) and (b), respectively).
Figure 14. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the liquid metal pool during ESR trial T3. (a) Ce2O2S, (b) Ce2O3. (EDS spectra shown in (c) and (d)correspond to the inclusions shown in (a) and (b), respectively).
Metals 12 02094 g014
Figure 15. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the liquid metal pool during ESR trial T3.
Figure 15. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the liquid metal pool during ESR trial T3.
Metals 12 02094 g015
Figure 16. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the ingot C3. (a) Ce2O3, (b) Ce2O2S. (EDS spectra shown in (c) and (d) correspond to the inclusions shown in (a) and (b), respectively).
Figure 16. SEM images and EDS spectra of typical inclusions in the ingot C3. (a) Ce2O3, (b) Ce2O2S. (EDS spectra shown in (c) and (d) correspond to the inclusions shown in (a) and (b), respectively).
Metals 12 02094 g016
Figure 17. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the ingot C3.
Figure 17. EDS element mappings of Ce2O2S inclusion in the ingot C3.
Metals 12 02094 g017
Figure 18. Size distribution of inclusions in the electrode, liquid metal pool, and ingots. (Pool represents liquid metal pool).
Figure 18. Size distribution of inclusions in the electrode, liquid metal pool, and ingots. (Pool represents liquid metal pool).
Metals 12 02094 g018
Figure 19. Proportion of different types of inclusion in steel (Elec. and Pool represent electrode and liquid metal pool, respectively. CA and MA represent CaO–Al2O3 and MgO·Al2O3, respectively).
Figure 19. Proportion of different types of inclusion in steel (Elec. and Pool represent electrode and liquid metal pool, respectively. CA and MA represent CaO–Al2O3 and MgO·Al2O3, respectively).
Metals 12 02094 g019
Figure 20. Inclusions formation in the electrode with different Ce contents calculated with FactSage 8.0. (a) 0.016 mass% Ce, (b) 0.300 mass% Ce.
Figure 20. Inclusions formation in the electrode with different Ce contents calculated with FactSage 8.0. (a) 0.016 mass% Ce, (b) 0.300 mass% Ce.
Metals 12 02094 g020
Figure 21. Inclusions transformation in the ingots with different Ce contents calculated with FactSage 8.0. (a) 0 mass% Ce, (c) 0.0055 mass% Ce, (d) 0.063 mass% Ce. (b) The change in the mass fraction of the component in liquid inclusion with 0 Ce.
Figure 21. Inclusions transformation in the ingots with different Ce contents calculated with FactSage 8.0. (a) 0 mass% Ce, (c) 0.0055 mass% Ce, (d) 0.063 mass% Ce. (b) The change in the mass fraction of the component in liquid inclusion with 0 Ce.
Metals 12 02094 g021
Figure 22. (a) Non-equilibrium precipitation of inclusions during the cooling and solidification of liquid steel. (a) 0 mass% Ce, (b) 0.0055 mass% Ce, (c) 0.063 mass% Ce.
Figure 22. (a) Non-equilibrium precipitation of inclusions during the cooling and solidification of liquid steel. (a) 0 mass% Ce, (b) 0.0055 mass% Ce, (c) 0.063 mass% Ce.
Metals 12 02094 g022
Table 1. Chemical compositions of the consumable electrodes (mass%).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of the consumable electrodes (mass%).
Trials No.CSiMnMoTiCrNiAlNbSCaCeMgNO
T10.020.50.832.490.1815.1220.150.980.00320.000200.00040.00710.0010
T20.020.50.892.530.1414.9220.100.990.00090.00020.0160.00030.01200.0006
T30.020.50.782.500.2114.6220.151.030.00250.00020.3000.00030.00310.0007
Table 2. Chemical Compositions of Remelted Ingots (mass%).
Table 2. Chemical Compositions of Remelted Ingots (mass%).
Ingot No.CSiMnMoTiCrNiAlNbSCaCeMgNO
C10.020.50.822.600.1315.5220.191.000.00070.000200.00040.00760.0016
C20.020.50.892.600.1215.4220.231.000.00070.00020.00550.00030.01400.0013
C30.020.50.832.500.1514.6220.151.020.00160.00020.06300.00030.00540.0018
Table 3. First-order interaction parameters used in the current study [29,30,31,32].
Table 3. First-order interaction parameters used in the current study [29,30,31,32].
CSiMnMoTiCrNiAlMgCaSCeNO
O−0.421−0.066−0.0210.005−1.8−0.0330.006−1.17−300-−0.133−0.570.057−0.17
S0.1110.075−0.026-−0.27−0.0105-0.041−1.82−110−0.046−1.910.01−0.27
Al0.0910.0560.035-0.004-−0.0290.045−0.3−0.0470.035−0.52−0.057−1.98
Ce−0.077---−3.62--−2.25--−8.36−0.003−6.612−5.03
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Shi, C.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Zhu, X. Evolution and Formation of Non-Metallic Inclusions during Electroslag Remelting of Ce-Bearing 15Cr-22Ni-1Nb Austenitic Heat-Resistant Steel. Metals 2022, 12, 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122094

AMA Style

Wang Z, Shi C, Wang S, Li J, Zhu X. Evolution and Formation of Non-Metallic Inclusions during Electroslag Remelting of Ce-Bearing 15Cr-22Ni-1Nb Austenitic Heat-Resistant Steel. Metals. 2022; 12(12):2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhongwei, Chengbin Shi, Shijun Wang, Jing Li, and Xin Zhu. 2022. "Evolution and Formation of Non-Metallic Inclusions during Electroslag Remelting of Ce-Bearing 15Cr-22Ni-1Nb Austenitic Heat-Resistant Steel" Metals 12, no. 12: 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12122094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop