Next Article in Journal
Spall Fracture of Solid and Molten Copper: Molecular Dynamics, Mechanical Model and Strain Rate Dependence
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of a Pronounced Pre-Deformation on the Attachment of Melt Droplets and the Fatigue Behavior of Laser-Cut AISI 304
Previous Article in Journal
The Formation and Disintegration of Rafts from Different Aluminas and Fines
Previous Article in Special Issue
In-Situ Characterization of Microstructural Changes in Alloy 718 during High-Temperature Low-Cycle Fatigue
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Very High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steels with Different Surface Morphologies

Metals 2022, 12(11), 1877; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12111877
by Marek Smaga *, Annika Boemke, Dietmar Eifler and Tilmann Beck
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Metals 2022, 12(11), 1877; https://doi.org/10.3390/met12111877
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This review report has been removed from the review record as it did not meet MDPI’s review report standards (https://www.mdpi.com/reviewers#_bookmark11).

Author Response

  

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Sir or Madam, 
we are grateful for your thorough review of our manuscript. For responses please look in PDF file.
Best  regards
M. Smaga

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors

It is high quality manuscript which deals with VHCF of the two austenitic stainless steels AISI 904L and AISI 347 with 7 different surface morphologies.

Extensive research work was carried out and various complementary methods were used to describe initial state of materials, surface microstructure, roughness, residual stresses, surface fracture analysis, etc.

The results are presented clear. The most appropriate surface morphology was from point of view of VHCF determined.

No relevant recommendations for improvement.

Author Response

Dear Sir or Madam,
we are grateful for your thorough review of our manuscript and positive recommendation!
Best regards,
M. Smaga

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This review report has been removed from the review record as it did not meet MDPI’s review report standards (https://www.mdpi.com/reviewers#_bookmark11).

Back to TopTop