Next Article in Journal
Simulation of Ultrasonic Induced Cavitation and Acoustic Streaming in Liquid and Solidifying Aluminum
Next Article in Special Issue
Extraction of Titanium from Low-Grade Ore with Different Leaching Agents in Autoclave
Previous Article in Journal
WO3 and Ionic Liquids: A Synergic Pair for Pollutant Gas Sensing and Desulfurization
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Adsorption Behavior of Moisture on Smelter Grade Alumina during Transportation and Storage—for Primary Aluminum Production
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Statistical Study for Leaching of Covellite in a Chloride Media

1
Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Procesos de Minerales, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1270300, Chile
2
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Universidad Arturo Prat, Almirante Juan José Latorre 2901, Antofagasta 1244260, Chile
3
Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica y Minas, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile
4
Área Académica de Ciencias de la Tierra y Materiales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Carretera Pachuca—Tulancingo km. 4.5, C.P. 42184, Mineral de la Reforma, Hidalgo C.P. 42184, Mexico
5
Escuela de Ingeniería Química, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile
6
Department of Mining, Geological and Cartographic Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Murcia, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2020, 10(4), 477; https://doi.org/10.3390/met10040477
Received: 23 March 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 3 April 2020 / Published: 4 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Metals: Metallurgy and Metal Technology)

Abstract

:
Covellite is a secondary copper sulfide, and it is not abundant. There are few investigations on this mineral in spite of it being formed during the leaching of chalcocite or digenite; the other investigations on covellite are with the use of mineraloids, copper concentrates, and synthetic covellite. The present investigation applied the surface optimization methodology using a central composite face design to evaluate the effect of leaching time, chloride concentration, and sulfuric acid concentration on the level of copper extraction from covellite (84.3% of purity). Copper is dissolved from a sample of pure covellite without the application of temperature or pressure; the importance of its purity is that the behavior of the parameters is analyzed, isolating the impurities that affect leaching. The chloride came from NaCl, and it was effectuated in a size range from –150 to +106 μm. An ANOVA indicated that the leaching time and chloride concentration have the most significant influence, while the copper extraction was independent of sulfuric acid concentration. The experimental data were described by a highly representative quadratic model obtained by linear regression (R2 = 0.99).

1. Introduction

Covellite is not an abundant, but it may be found in many copper deposits as a supergenic mineral, usually as a coating in the sulfide enrichment zone. It is associated with the derivation due to alteration from other minerals, such as chalcocite, chalcopyrite, bornite, and enargite [1]. Covellite appears in attractive proportion in the oxidized minerals; it is an intermediate product for the conversion of chalcopyrite [2] and participates in transforming digenite to covellite in oxygenated media [3,4].
Sulfurized copper ores are generally treated by flotation–smelting–refining [5,6,7]. Although they have reported economic [8] and metallurgical viability, there are environmental problems associated with the emission of sulfur dioxide and arsenic [9,10,11,12,13]. Arsenic, which has continuously increased in recent decades with the increasing extraction of copper sulfide [14], presents a risk to human health associated with a higher incidence of cancer and cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [15]. This has led to increasingly stringent environmental controls. In contrast, the recovery of complex low-grade copper minerals is based on the hydrometallurgical method, which is preferred due to its low cost of treatment, short construction time, operational simplicity, and functional recovery performance [16]. Additionally, this strategy has environmental benefits by producing non-hazardous solid waste [17,18,19].
Sulfuric acid and an oxidizing agent are required to break down sulfurized copper ores and release Cu2+ in solution. All copper sulfides require the presence of Fe3+ and O2 as oxidizing agents for leaching to occur. Copper sulfide is oxidized by the presence of Fe3+, and the resulting Fe2+ is reoxidized to Fe3+ by O2. The redox pair Fe2+/Fe3+ act as a catalyst in these reactions. The following reactions occur with the main secondary copper mineral, chalcocite, when the temperature is high (Equation (1)), and the sulfur is in the form of sulfate and not of elemental sulfur, as in natural conditions (Equations (2) and (3)) [5]:
Cu2S(s) + Fe2(SO4)3(aq) = Cu2+(aq) + SO42−(aq) + CuS(s) + 2FeSO4(aq)
Cu2S(s) + 2Fe3+(aq) = Cu2+(aq) + 2Fe2+(aq)
CuS(s) + 2Fe3+(aq) = Cu2+(aq) + 2Fe2+(aq) + S0(s).
Research studies on covellite leaching have been varied, evaluating alternatives that contemplate different dissolution media, such as ammonia [16,20], nitrates [21,22], and chlorides [4,23,24,25]. Bioleaching has also been considered, including bacteria such as thiobacillus ferrooxidans, acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, and acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, which can grow under anaerobic conditions where ferric ions are used as electron receptors [26,27,28,29].
Several researchers [23,24,30,31,32] have reported two phases in which copper dissolves from chalcocite in a sulfate or chloride media:
Cu2S(s) + 2Fe3+(aq) = Cu2+(aq) + CuS(s) + 2Fe2+(aq)
CuS(s) + 2Fe3+(aq) = Cu2+(aq) + S0(s) + 2Fe2+(aq).
According to Niu et al. [30], the leaching from chalcocite to covellite is fast (Equation (4)) because of its low activation energy (4–25 kJ/mol); then, the reaction is controlled by the effect diffusive of an oxidant on the mineral surface. Otherwise, the stage expressed in Equation (5), which corresponds to the transformation of covelline to dissolved copper, is slower and requires an activation energy close to 72 kJ/mol, suggesting electrochemical control [24,33]. Nicol and Basson [25] indicated that the oxidation of covellite occurs as an intermediate stage in which it is transformed into polysulfide CuS2:
Cu2S2(s) = CuS2(s) + Cu2+(aq) + 2e
CuS2(s) = Cu2+(aq) + 2S0(s) + 2e.
Covellite can be oxidized over a wide range of chloride concentrations and electrochemical potential; however, the subsequent oxidation of CuS2 is only achieved from media with high chloride concentrations or high potentials [25]. Copper leaching processes in a chloride media are especially adequate for leaching non-ferrous minerals such as chalcocite, djurleite, digenite, and covellite, since in these cases, the leaching solutions contain low levels of dissolved iron [3].
The expected general reaction to predict copper dissolution under the conditions described is:
4 CuS ( s ) + 8 Cl ( aq ) + 4 H + ( aq ) + O 2 ( g ) = 4 Cu Cl 2 ( aq ) + 2 H 2 O ( l ) + 4 S 0 ( s ) .
In previous research on covellite leaching carried out by other authors, the common factor is that it was carried out with a synthetic covellite (a mineraloid), whereas the covellite used in this article is pure, coming from a mine and manually separated from impurities. The creation of synthetic covellite is from a stoichiometric mixture of high-purity copper and elemental sulfur, with the application of high temperature and vacuum sealing over long periods (approximately 3 days) for its formation. Investigations such as those of Cheng and Lawson [23] and Miki et al. [24] feature examples of synthetic covellite experiments (see Table 1). Meanwhile, other copper sulfide leaching investigations have been carried out with concentrates high in chalcopyrite, enargite, digenite, and chalcocite, among others, such as for example the investigations by Lundstrom [2], Ruiz [34], and Padilla [35]. The amount of associated impurities within the concentrate, such as clay elements, pyrite, and silicas, among other compounds, can affect the overall analysis of the tests, which makes the experiment very unique based on its conditions. Finally, there are investigations carried out with white metal [31,36], which is an intermediate species that is formed in copper smelting furnaces that is mineralogically similar to chalcocite but does not have the same crystallographic behavior.
In this study, we leached pure covellite in a chloride medium with the incorporation of oxygen. This was performed at ambient temperature and pressure to determine the relevance of the sulfuric acid and sodium chloride concentration, followed by the dissolution time. The data were used to make a statistical analysis through a representative quadratic model of copper extraction.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Covellite

The covellite sample was obtained from a Michilla mine. Using a porcelain mortar, the sample (apparently pure) was reduced to a size between −150 and +106 μm, and then these were chemically analyzed by atomic emission spectrometry via induction-coupled plasma (ICP-AES) in the geochemistry lab of the Geological Sciences Department of the Universidad Católica del Norte (Antofagasta, Chile). Table 2 shows the chemical composition of the experimental samples.
The mineralogical analysis is presented in Table 2, where the chemical species were identified by QEMSCAN (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Covellite was the most abundant mineral (84.3%), followed by a lower percentage of gypsum (15.7%).

2.2. Reagent and Leaching Tests

The sulfuric acid of analytical grade was acquired from Merck, with a purity of 95–97%, density of 1.84 kg/L, and molecular weight of 98.08 g/mol.
The leaching tests were carried out in a 50-mL glass reactor with a 0.01 S/L ratio of the leaching solution. A total of 200 mg of covellite ore was maintained in agitation and suspension at 600 rpm in a five-position magnetic stirrer (IKA ROS, CEP 13087-534, Campinas, Brazil) with an oxygen addition of 6 mL/min connecting a hose to the reactor. The tests were realized at an ambient temperature (25 °C), with variations of sulfuric acid and chloride concentrations and leaching time. The tests were performed in duplicate; chemical analyses were carried on 5 mL undiluted samples using atomic absorption spectrometry with a coefficient of variation ≤ 5% and a relative error between 5% and 10%. Measurements of pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) of PLS (pregnant leaching solution) were made using a pH-ORP meter (HANNA HI-4222, St. Louis, MO, USA). The solution ORP was measured in a combination ORP electrode cell composed of a platinum working electrode and a saturated Ag/AgCl reference electrode.

2.3. Experimental Design

The Cu extraction rates was studied through the effects of time and chloride and H2SO4 concentrations variables on leaching covellite [37,38,39,40]. An experimental design was carried out considering three levels per factor, resulting in a total of 27 samples [41]. The fit of the multiple linear regression model was generated in the statistical software Minitab 18 (version 18, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA), studying the linear and quadratic effects and the interactions of the factors considered in the study [42], as shown in Equation (9).
The general form of the experimental model is represented by (Equation (9)):
  Y = overall   constant + linear   effects + ( interaction   effects ) + ( curvature   effects ) Y = b 0 + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 3 x 3 + b 12 x 1 x 2 + b 13 x 1 x 3 + b 23 x 2 x 3 + b 11 x 1 2 + b 22 x 2 2 + b 33 x 3 2
where b represents the variables coefficients and x1, x2, and x3 are time, chloride, and H2SO4 concentration variables, respectively. Table 3 shows the parameters used in the experimental model, and Equation (10) shows the transformation between the real values (Zi) and coded values (Xi) of the experimental design.
X i   = Z i     Z high + Z low 2 Z high     Z low 2
where Zhigh and Zlow are respectively the highest and lowest levels of each variable [43].
The levels of selected parameters (Table 3) are justified by the following, starting with the level of chloride: at an industrial level, concentrations of up to 100 g/L of chloride are being used to leach copper sulfides, while other researchers have indicated that the concentration of chloride does not have much relevance after 0.5 M [23], which is equivalent to 18 g/L. That is why 20 to 100 g/L was selected to evaluate its effect as a function of concentration. Meanwhile, something similar occurs with choice of the concentration of sulfuric acid. Some researchers have mentioned that its effect is minimal in the dissolution of copper from covellite; it is only necessary in small amounts. In the research of Cheng and Lawson [23], a significant change is not highlighted when the concentration of sulfuric acid was 0.5 or 2 M; therefore, these two values are chosen as limits to analyze their effect.
The R2, R2adj, and p-values statistics were used to indicate whether the model obtained is adequate to describe the dependent variable under the sampled domain. The R2 statistics measures the proportion of total variability that is explained by the model, the predicted R2 statistic determines the performance of the model predicting the response, and finally, the p-values indicate whether there is a statistically significant association between the dependent variable and a determined independent variable [43].

3. Results

3.1. ANOVA

Based on the results obtained (Table 4). An ANOVA test (Table 5) showed no significant effect of the interaction {time, Cl} and the effects of the curvature of chloride variable on the dependent variable (copper extraction). Meanwhile, the interactions between the effects {Time, H2SO4} and {Chloride, H2SO4} and the curvature of time variable contribute to explain the variability of the model.
The contour plot in Figure 1 shows that the Cu extraction rate increases with more time and higher concentrations of chloride and H2SO4.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show that the linear effect of time, chloride, and H2SO4 concentration and the interactions of time–H2SO4 concentration and of chloride–H2SO4 concentrations affected the Cu extraction rate.
Then, the Cu extraction rate model over the range of sampled conditions is presented in Equation (11).
Cu   Extraction   ( % ) = 0.16969 + 0.12332 x 1   + 0.03904 x 2 + 0.02502 x 3 + 0.01782 x 1 2     0 . 00870 x 3 2 + 0.00921 x 1 x 3 + 0.01347 x 2 x 3
The ANOVA test indicated that the model presented in Equation (11) represents adequately the Cu extraction under the experimental domain, which is validated by the R2 (0.9945) and R2adj values (0.9925). The ANOVA indicates that all the factors influence the Cu extraction from CuS, as indicated in the F statistic, where Freg (371.42) > FT,95% confidence level F7,19 (2.543). Additionally, the p-value was lower than the significance level, which indicates that the multiple regression is statistically significant.
The normality test applied to the standardized residuals of the regression model (Equation (11)) indicates that the residuals are relatively close to the fitted normal distribution line (Figure 4), and the p-value of the test is greater than the significance level (0.05), so it is not possible to reject the assumption that the model residuals are normally distributed.
Finally, the ANOVA analysis indicated that the independent variables considered can explain the variations in the copper extraction, the minimal difference between R2 and R2pred reduces the possibility that the model is over-adjusted, and the leaching, chloride, and H2SO4 concentrations, and the interactions of time–H2SO4 and chloride–H2SO4 are the most critical factors in explaining the process.

3.2. Effect of Chloride Concentration

Figure 5 shows that the highest rate of copper extraction (71.2%) was obtained with high concentrations of chloride ions (100 g/L), demonstrating the importance of this variable [4,24]. However, Cheng and Lawson [23] stated that over a critical chloride concentration at 0.25 M, there is no more significant influence of the electrolyte. In the range of 20 to 50 (g/L), chloride has no positive effects based on the leaching time, obtaining maximum copper extractions of 44.9% and 56.3%, respectively. This agrees with the results of other research [24], which indicates that CuS oxidation to CuS2 is possible with any chloride concentration, but the oxidation of CuS2 is only possible with very high potential or high chloride concentrations [25].

4. Conclusions

The present research shows the laboratory results of dissolving copper from covellite in chloride media provided by NaCl. The highest copper extraction rate was obtained with the highest concentrations of chloride, and the main findings of this investigation were:
  • The linear variables of time and chloride concentration have the greatest influence on the model.
  • Under ambient conditions of pressure and temperature, H2SO4 concentration–time and chloride concentration–time have significant effects on copper extraction kinetics from covellite.
  • The ANOVA analysis indicates that the quadratic model adequately represents copper extraction, which was validated by the R2 value (0.9945).
  • The highest copper extraction rate at ambient temperature of 71.2% was obtained with a low sulfuric acid concentration (0.5 M), high level of chloride (100 g/L), and extended leaching time (600 h).

Author Contributions

K.P., N.T., R.I.J. contributed in project administration, investigation and wrote paper, M.S. and D.T. contributed in the data curation, E.S.-R. and P.R. contributed in validation and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the contribution of the Scientific Equipment Unit-MAINI of the Universidad Católica del Norte for facilitating the chemical analysis of the solutions. Pedro Robles thanks the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso for the support provided. Also, we thank Conicyt Fondecyt 11171036 and Centro CRHIAM Project Conicyt/Fondap/15130015.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klein, C.; Hurlbut, C.S. Manual de Mineralogía; Reverté: Madrid, Spain, 1996; ISBN 8429146067. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lundström, M.; Liipo, J.; Taskinen, P.; Aromaa, J. Copper precipitation during leaching of various copper sulfide concentrates with cupric chloride in acidic solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 166, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ruiz, M.C.; Honores, S.; Padilla, R. Leaching kinetics of digenite concentrate in oxygenated chloride media at ambient pressure. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1998, 29, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Senanayake, G. Chloride assisted leaching of chalcocite by oxygenated sulphuric acid via Cu(II)-OH-Cl. Miner. Eng. 2007, 20, 1075–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schlesinger, M.E.; King, M.J.; Sole, K.C.; Davenport, W.G. Extractive Metallurgy of Copper, 5th ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2011; ISBN 9780080967899. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shuva, M.A.H.; Rhamdhani, M.A.; Brooks, G.A.; Masood, S.; Reuter, M.A. Thermodynamics data of valuable elements relevant to e-waste processing through primary and secondary copper production: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 131, 795–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Turan, M.D.; Sari, Z.A.; Miller, J.D. Leaching of blended copper slag in microwave oven. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2017, 27, 1404–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kelm, U.; Avendaño, M.; Balladares, E.; Helle, S.; Karlsson, T.; Pincheira, M. The use of water-extractable Cu, Mo, Zn, As, Pb concentrations and automated mineral analysis of flue dust particles as tools for impact studies in topsoils exposed to past emissions of a Cu-smelter. Chemie der Erde 2014, 74, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Afif, C.; Chélala, C.; Borbon, A.; Abboud, M.; Adjizian-Gérard, J.; Farah, W.; Jambert, C.; Zaarour, R.; Saliba, N.B.; Perros, P.E.; et al. SO2 in Beirut: Air quality implication and effects of local emissions and long-range transport. Air Qual. Atmos. Heal. 2008, 1, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Dijksira, R.; Senyard, B.; Shah, U.; Lee, H. Economical abatement of high-strength SO2 off-gas from a smelter. J. South. African Inst. Min. Metall. 2017, 117, 1003–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Dimitrijević, M.; Kostov, A.; Tasić, V.; Milosević, N. Influence of pyrometallurgical copper production on the environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sánchez de la Campa, A.M.; de la Rosa, J.D.; Sánchez-Rodas, D.; Oliveira, V.; Alastuey, A.; Querol, X.; Gómez Ariza, J.L. Arsenic speciation study of PM2.5 in an urban area near a copper smelter. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 6487–6495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Serbula, S.M.; Milosavljevic, J.S.; Radojevic, A.A.; Kalinovic, J.V.; Kalinovic, T.S. Extreme air pollution with contaminants originating from the mining—Metallurgical processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 586, 1066–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Balladares, E.; Jerez, O.; Parada, F.; Baltierra, L.; Hernández, C.; Araneda, E.; Parra, V. Neutralization and co-precipitation of heavy metals by lime addition to effluent from acid plant in a copper smelter. Miner. Eng. 2018, 122, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2018: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; ISBN 9789241565585. [Google Scholar]
  16. Baba, A.A.; Balogun, A.F.; Olaoluwa, D.T.; Bale, R.B.; Adekola, F.A.; Alabi, A.G.F. Leaching kinetics of a Nigerian complex covellite ore by the ammonia-ammonium sulfate solution. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. González, C.; Parra, R.; Klenovcanova, A.; Imris, I.; Sánchez, M. Reduction of Chilean copper slags: A case of waste management project. Scand. J. Metall. 2005, 34, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lü, C.; Wang, Y.; Qian, P.; Liu, Y.; Fu, G.; Ding, J.; Ye, S.; Chen, Y. Separation of chalcopyrite and pyrite from a copper tailing by ammonium humate. Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 26, 1814–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rabadjieva, D.; Tepavitcharova, S.; Todorov, T.; Dassenakis, M.; Paraskevopoulou, V.; Petrov, M. Chemical speciation in mining affected waters: The case study of Asarel-Medet mine. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 159, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reilly, I.G.; Scott, D.S. The leaching of cupric sulfide in ammonia. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1976, 15, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fisher, W.W. Comparison of chalcocite dissolution in the sulfate, perchlorate, nitrate, chloride, ammonia, and cyanide systems. Miner. Eng. 1994, 7, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vračar, R.Ž.; Vučković, N.; Kamberović, Ž. Leaching of copper(I) sulphide by sulphuric acid solution with addition of sodium nitrate. Hydrometallurgy 2003, 70, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, C.Y.; Lawson, F. The kinetics of leaching covellite in acidic oxygenated sulphate-chloride solutions. Hydrometallurgy 1991, 27, 249–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miki, H.; Nicol, M.; Velásquez-Yévenes, L. The kinetics of dissolution of synthetic covellite, chalcocite and digenite in dilute chloride solutions at ambient temperatures. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 105, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. Nicol, M.; Basson, P. The anodic behaviour of covellite in chloride solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 172, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Donati, E.; Pogliani, C.; Boiardi, J.L. Anaerobic leaching of covellite by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 47, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Monteiro, F.V.; Garcia, O.; Tuovinen, O. Oxidative dissolution of covellite by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Process Metall. 1999, 9, 283–290. [Google Scholar]
  28. Falco, L.; Pogliani, C.; Curutchet, G.; Donati, E. A comparison of bioleaching of covellite using pure cultures of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans or a mixed culture of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 2003, 71, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, J.; Acar, S.; Doerr, D.L.; Brierley, J.A. Comparative bioleaching and mineralogy of composited sulfide ores containing enargite, covellite and chalcocite by mesophilic and thermophilic microorganisms. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 105, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Niu, X.; Ruan, R.; Tan, Q.; Jia, Y.; Sun, H. Study on the second stage of chalcocite leaching in column with redox potential control and its implications. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 155, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ruiz, M.C.; Abarzúa, E.; Padilla, R. Oxygen pressure leaching of white metal. Hydrometallurgy 2007, 86, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Senanayake, G. A review of chloride assisted copper sulfide leaching by oxygenated sulfuric acid and mechanistic considerations. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 98, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Ruan, R.; Zou, G.; Zhong, S.; Wu, Z.; Chan, B.; Wang, D. Why Zijinshan copper bioheapleaching plant works efficiently at low microbial activity-Study on leaching kinetics of copper sulfides and its implications. Miner. Eng. 2013, 48, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ruiz, M.C.; Montes, K.S.; Padilla, R. Chalcopyrite leaching in sulfate-chloride media at ambient pressure. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 109, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Padilla, R.; Jerez, O.; Ruiz, M.C. Hydrometallurgy Kinetics of the pressure leaching of enargite in FeSO4–H2SO4–O2 media. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 158, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ruiz, M.C.; Gallardo, E.; Padilla, R. Copper extraction from white metal by pressure leaching in H2SO4-FeSO4-O2. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 100, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aguirre, C.L.; Toro, N.; Carvajal, N.; Watling, H.; Aguirre, C. Leaching of chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) with an imidazolium-based ionic liquid in the presence of chloride. Miner. Eng. 2016, 99, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bezerra, M.A.; Santelli, R.E.; Oliveira, E.P.; Villar, L.S.; Escaleira, L.A. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 2008, 76, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dean, A.; Voss, D.; Draguljic, D. Response Surface Methodology. In Design and Analysis of Experiments; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 565–614. [Google Scholar]
  40. Toro, N.; Herrera, N.; Castillo, J.; Torres, C.; Sepúlveda, R. Initial investigation into the leaching of manganese from nodules at room temperature with the use of sulfuric acid and the addition of foundry slag—Part I. Minerals 2018, 8, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Toro, N.; Saldaña, M.; Gálvez, E.; Cánovas, M.; Trigueros, E.; Castillo, J.; Hernández, P.C. Optimization of parameters for the dissolution of mn from manganese nodules with the use of tailings in an acid medium. Minerals 2019, 9, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  42. Saldaña, M.; Toro, N.; Castillo, J.; Hernández, P.; Trigueros, E.; Navarra, A. Development of an analytical model for the extraction of manganese from marine nodules. Metals 2019, 9, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  43. Montgomery, D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Experimental contour plot of Cu extraction versus time and chloride (a), time and H2SO4 concentration (b), and chloride concentration and H2SO4 concentration (c).
Figure 1. Experimental contour plot of Cu extraction versus time and chloride (a), time and H2SO4 concentration (b), and chloride concentration and H2SO4 concentration (c).
Metals 10 00477 g001
Figure 2. Linear effect plot for Cu extraction.
Figure 2. Linear effect plot for Cu extraction.
Metals 10 00477 g002
Figure 3. Interactions of time–chloride (a), time–H2SO4 concentration (b), and chloride–H2SO4 (c) on Cu extraction.
Figure 3. Interactions of time–chloride (a), time–H2SO4 concentration (b), and chloride–H2SO4 (c) on Cu extraction.
Metals 10 00477 g003
Figure 4. Probability plot of residual values.
Figure 4. Probability plot of residual values.
Metals 10 00477 g004
Figure 5. Extraction of Cu (%) vs. time (h), depending on the addition of chloride.
Figure 5. Extraction of Cu (%) vs. time (h), depending on the addition of chloride.
Metals 10 00477 g005
Table 1. Comparison with other investigations under similar conditions.
Table 1. Comparison with other investigations under similar conditions.
Research TitleDissolution AgentsParameters EvaluatedRef.Maximum Cu Extraction (%)Type of Covellite
The kinetics of leaching covellite in acidic oxygenated sulfate—chloride solutionsHCl, HNO3, NaCl, H2SO4Temperature, oxygen partial pressure, particle size, stirring speed, and sulfuric acid concentration[23]85%Synthetic covellite
The kinetics of dissolution of synthetic covellite, chalcocite, and digenite in dilute chloride solutions at ambient temperaturesHCl, Cu2+ and Fe3+Potential effect, chloride concentration, acid concentration, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pyrite effect[24]>90%Synthetic covellite
Table 2. Chemical analysis of the covellite ore.
Table 2. Chemical analysis of the covellite ore.
ElementCuSCaOH
Mass (%)56.1431.083.668.760.36
Table 3. Experimental parameters and codifications level.
Table 3. Experimental parameters and codifications level.
Experimental VariableLowMediumHigh
Time (h)4872144
Chloride Concentration (g/L)2050100
H2SO4 Concentration (M)0.512
Codifications−101
Table 4. Experimental configuration and Cu extraction data (at T = 25 °C, Stirring rate = 600 rpm, P = 1 atm).
Table 4. Experimental configuration and Cu extraction data (at T = 25 °C, Stirring rate = 600 rpm, P = 1 atm).
Exp. No.Time (h)Cl (g/L)H2SO4 (M)Cu Extraction Rate (%)
148200.52.50
248500.53.50
3481000.56.00
4482013.00
5485013.63
64810019.13
7482023.25
8485025.50
948100211.38
1072200.55.13
1172500.58.75
12721000.511.25
13722015.88
14725019.25
1572100113.88
16722026.38
177250211.63
1872100218.75
19144200.524.63
20144500.524.88
211441000.528.75
2214420126.25
2314450129.75
24144100135.00
2514420228.75
2614450231.25
27144100238.75
Table 5. ANOVA Cu extraction.
Table 5. ANOVA Cu extraction.
SourceF-Valuep-Value
Regression371.420.000
Time2624.360.000
Cl257.040.000
H2SO4105.50.000
Time × Time9.70.006
Cl × Cl0.560.466
H2SO4 × H2SO43.390.083
Time × Cl0.810.379
Time × H2SO411.220.004
Cl × H2SO422.60.000

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez, K.; Toro, N.; Saldaña, M.; Salinas-Rodríguez, E.; Robles, P.; Torres, D.; Jeldres, R.I. Statistical Study for Leaching of Covellite in a Chloride Media. Metals 2020, 10, 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10040477

AMA Style

Pérez K, Toro N, Saldaña M, Salinas-Rodríguez E, Robles P, Torres D, Jeldres RI. Statistical Study for Leaching of Covellite in a Chloride Media. Metals. 2020; 10(4):477. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10040477

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez, Kevin, Norman Toro, Manuel Saldaña, Eleazar Salinas-Rodríguez, Pedro Robles, David Torres, and Ricardo I. Jeldres. 2020. "Statistical Study for Leaching of Covellite in a Chloride Media" Metals 10, no. 4: 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10040477

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop