Next Article in Journal
Modelling of Grain Size Evolution with Different Approaches via FEM When Hard Machining of AISI 4140
Previous Article in Journal
Shear Strength and Aging Characteristics of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu/Cu Solder Joint Reinforced with ZrO2 Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimum Soft Magnetic Properties of the FeSiBNbCu Alloy Achieved by Heat Treatment and Tailoring B/Si Ratio

1
Department of Physics, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2020, 10(10), 1297; https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101297
Submission received: 31 August 2020 / Revised: 24 September 2020 / Accepted: 25 September 2020 / Published: 28 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Metal Casting, Forming and Heat Treatment)

Abstract

:
To increase the saturation magnetization (Ms) of commercially available soft magnetic Finemet alloys to the level comparable to that of Si-steel and Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys such as Nanoperm, Nanomet, the B or Si content in combination with annealing heat treatment was tailored. The ribbons of Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) were prepared by melt-spinning and annealed at different temperatures to develop nanocrystalline microstructure optimizing the soft magnetic properties. The magnetic properties of the as-spun and annealed ribbons were measured using a vibrating sample magnetometer and AC B-H loop tracer to acquire Ms of above 1.4 T in all as-spun ribbons. Among the alloys, Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 annealed at 545 °C showed the highest Ms of 2 T, which exceeds that of the conventional Finemet and other Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys.

1. Introduction

Due to their superior soft magnetic properties, magnetic materials such as Si-steel have been widely used to produce actuators, sensors, transformer cores, or electric motors [1,2]. Recently, attention has been paid to low core loss (Pcv) due to the increasing demand on energy efficiency [3]. Fe-based soft magnetic or nanocrystalline alloys could be a strong candidate for the emerging engineering technologies thanks to their potential for low Pcv and sufficient mechanical properties [4,5,6]. However, the saturation magnetization (Ms) of these materials is relatively lower than that of Si-steels [4]. Therefore, improving the soft magnetic properties of the alloys to keep Pcv low and, at the same time, to increase Ms to the level exceeding that of Si-steel is required for the development of next-generation soft magnetic materials.
Finemet alloys are based on Fe-Si-B-Nb-Cu, which are derived from the conventional Fe-Si-B system with a minor addition of Cu and Nb [7]. High soft magnetic properties in these alloys are originated from the precipitation of nanocrystalline α-Fe dispersed in an amorphous matrix [8,9,10,11]. Although the overall magnetic properties of Finemet were considered innovatory when it was first produced by Yoshizawa et.al in 1988 [10], currently, there are some competing nanocrystalline alloys that have remarkable soft magnetic properties including Nanoperm, Hitperm, or Nanomet. These alloys show very high saturation magnetization flux density (Bs) above 1.5 T higher than that of Finemet which is 1.23 T [12,13,14,15]. However, the Finemet-based alloys are still attractive as soft magnetic materials because of the potential for further improvement including excellent magnetic permeability (μr ~103 at the frequency of 1 kHz), low coercivity (Hc), as well as low Pcv (~300 kW/m3), which make the alloys suitable for the use in electric power applications [16].
There are numerous reports that the substitution of elements in the Finemet alloy leads to the improvement of its magnetic properties. In particular, the Finemet-based alloys with a higher Fe content or with B replacing part of Si of a Fe-Si-B-Cu alloy system resulted in an increase of their soft magnetic properties although the latter case induced higher Hc [7,17]. Therefore, effect of B and Si content variation in connection with the Fe content on the soft magnetic properties would be of interest in the further optimization of the Finemet-based alloy system. In this study, we focused on increasing the value of saturation magnetization Ms while maintaining low Pcv by varying the B or Si contents. We modified the atomic concentration of B or Si in the Finemet-based alloy system in exchange with Fe content. In addition, in order to further optimize soft magnetic properties, annealing treatment at various temperatures (Ta) was applied.

2. Materials and Methods

Multicomponent ingots with the compositions of Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) were prepared by arc melting under Ti-gettered argon atmosphere and remelted at least four times for homogeneity. Amorphous ribbons were produced by using melt-spinner in an argon atmosphere with a wheel speed of 56.3 m/s. The width and thickness of ribbons were 2 mm and 20–30 μm, respectively. As-spun ribbons were annealed in a vertical furnace at various temperatures for 60 min under an argon atmosphere. The cooling rate that can be achieved in this method was of order 0.67 °C/s. The structural properties of as-spun ribbons were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu-Kα radiation (D8 Advance, Bruker, Germany). The Ms was measured with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature under the in-plane applied magnetic field ranging from −10,000 to 10,000 Oe. Additionally, the density of the specimens was determined using a helium pycnometer (AccuPyc II, Micromeritics). The μr and Pcv were investigated by using an AC B-H loop tracer. The values of μr were measured under the maximum applied filed (Hm) of 800 A/m, and the values of Pcv were measured under a frequency (f) of 100 kHz and the Hm of 0.1 A/m. For annealing, a temperature above the crystallization temperature (Tx) of the as-spun amorphous ribbons was chosen for each specimen. Tx was measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at a heating rate of 0.34 °C/s.

3. Results and Discussion

The atomic structure of as-spun Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) ribbons was determined using XRD where Cu-Kα radiation was used. Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns for the as-spun ribbons with variation of Si and B content. The patterns of ribbons with different B contents (upper 3 patterns in Figure 1) consist of broad halos without any sharp diffraction peaks corresponding to crystalline phases, indicating that the structure is fully amorphous for the alloys considered here. However, the as-spun ribbons of Fe81Si6B9Nb3Cu1 and Fe79Si8B9Nb3Cu1 (4th and 5th patterns from the top of the Figure 1, respectively) have obvious crystalline peaks in the 2θ range of 40–50°. This suggests that the ribbons are partially crystallized. The alloys Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe77Si10B9Nb3Cu1 (x = 10, y = 9) maintain amorphous phase in as-spun state suggesting their good glass-forming ability (GFA).
The hysteresis loops for Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) of the as-spun ribbons are shown in Figure 2. All specimens exhibit high soft magnetic properties with a high Ms about of 1.4–1.5 T. The measured Ms for all as-spun ribbons are summarized in Table 1.
As can be seen in Table 1, with decrease in the Si or B content, the values of Ms increase mainly because of the accompanying increase in Fe content [18].
For the optimum conditions of formation, the dependence of the onset crystallization on temperature and Cu content is noteworthy [19]. It was determined by DSC. The DSC curves, which indicate the crystallization behavior of the amorphous ribbons with different B or Si content, are shown in Figure 3a,b and compared with Finemet as a reference (placed on top of both Figure 3a,b with composition of Fe73.5Si13.5B9Nb3Cu1). The exothermic peaks are observed for all ribbons, which suggest the crystallization reaction of the as-spun alloys. The Tx values are increased from 394 to 422 °C and from 425 to 475 °C along with an increase in the B content from 11 to 13 at.% and the Si content from 6 to 10 at.%, respectively. For the Fe-based amorphous alloys that are mostly intended for the soft magnetic applications, the first crystalline phase precipitating at the lowest temperature is likely to be α-iron, which dominantly contributes to the high magnetization. Therefore, for commercial nanocrystalline alloys, the suitable Ta is usually in the range between the end of the first crystallization and the start of the second crystallization to effectively control the volume fraction, precipitate size, and distribution of the α-iron [20]. Based on the acquired Tx values, the annealing temperatures (Ta) were determined. For obtaining the nanocrystalline state, each as-spun ribbon was annealed under argon atmosphere at various Ta covering a wide range. Four different annealing temperatures for each alloy were applied: the lowest Ta is near the onset temperature Tx with three more annealing conditions of higher temperature [19]. The values of Ta and Tx are listed in Table 2.
After cooling down to room temperature, the annealed ribbons were measured again by VSM. Figure 4 depicts the hysteresis loops for the Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 alloy, for their as-spun state and after annealing treatment at 395, 445, 495 and 545 °C for 60 min. The Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 alloy has been selected since this alloy shows the highest values of Ms among the annealed alloys with different element atomic ratio. In addition, Figure 5a,b shows the variation of Ms and Hc of the Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 along with Ta. The graphs show the trend that the tendencies of Ms and Hc are opposite. As can be seen in Figure 5, there is a correlation between Ms and Ta. Ms considerably increased with an increase of Ta. Furthermore, Ms decreased at Ta = 445 °C, then reached the maximum value of 2.06 T at 545 °C. Based on the DSC patterns in Figure 3, we propose that structural reordering, eventually leading to crystallization, begins at annealing temperatures of around 394 °C. The alloy becomes magnetically harder after annealing in the temperature range between 395 and 445 °C compared with either its relaxed amorphous state or the nanostructured state after crystallization [21].
For Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1, Ta = 545 °C, the Ms is 2.06 T, which is the highest value of all the considered alloys. Moreover, the lowest Hc measured at 1 kHz is 114.52 A/m when Ta = 545 °C at which the highest Ms is exhibited. The highest Hc measured at a 1 kHz is 301.88 A/m at Ta = 445 °C. This change in magnetic behavior with Ta containing both Cu and Nb can be interpreted based on the report that observed similar cases [21]. The latter magnetic hardening appears to be a consequence of the appearance of Cu-enriched clusters, which form even before the Tx. Simultaneously with Cu precipitation, α-Fe grains start to nucleate. Both the Cu-enriched clusters and the α-FeSi nanocrystals would act as pinning centers for the domain wall displacements, thereby increasing Hc [22]. Through the annealing treatment, the residual stress was removed, and it resulted in the structural relaxation. Therefore, the Hc were considerably reduced due to the reduced free volume and the nucleated clusters [22,23]. As a result, the Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 represented the excellent soft magnetic properties such as high Ms and low Hc at Ta = 545 °C. The detailed magnetic properties such as Ms and Hc of the Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 ribbons are summarized in Table 3. The annealed Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 ribbons exhibit a very high Ms > 200 emu/g (1.8 T) at all Ta. These values are considered very high, which are higher than that of Finemet or Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys of ~1.5 T [7,13,14,15]. The Hc values of the annealed Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 significantly decreased from 272.96 to 114.52 at 1 kHz, from 329.01 to 157.18 at 10 kHz, and from 357.94 to 184.83 at 20 kHz along with increasing Ta.
In Figure 6, the annealing temperature dependence of μr and Pcv of the Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 alloy are shown. The graph shows a trend that the tendencies of Hc and Pcv are similar. In addition, the values of μr increase with increasing Ta. The smallest value of Pcv ~ 406 mW/cm3 and the highest value of μr ~ 1340 are present in Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 annealed at 545 °C at the f of 1 kHz. These values of μr and Pcv are superior soft magnetic properties compared to the conventional value of Finemet (μr ~ 103, Pcv ~ 300 kW/m3 at the f of 1 kHz) [14]. Annealing at a higher temperature leads to an increase in the number density of nanocrystals. However, if the Ta is as high as the second crystallization temperature, the overall properties such as μr and Pcv deteriorate due to the formation of other compounds, for instance, iron boride phases such as Fe3B (tetragonal structure) and Fe23B6 (fcc structure) [24]. The μr and Pcv values of all specimens are compared in Table 4. Overall, the alloys show similar tendencies with Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1. The annealed Fe79Si8B9Nb3Cu1 exhibits the highest μr, and the annealed Fe79Si10B9Nb3Cu1 exhibits the lowest Pcv ~100 mW/cm3 at the f of 1 kHz. Although there is no obvious correlation between Pcv and Ta, the Pcv values of the alloys with variation of Si ratio is relatively lower than that of the alloys with variation of B ratio.

4. Conclusions

In this study, soft magnetic properties of Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) alloys were investigated by tailoring B or Si content ratio. All alloys were annealed at the various Ta in order to achieve the precipitation of nanocrystalline α-Fe phase and to optimize the soft magnetic properties.
The X-ray diffraction patterns of the as-spun alloys with variation of Si and B content reveal an amorphous structure except for Fe81Si6B9Nb3Cu1 and Fe79Si8B9Nb3Cu1, which are partially crystalline. As-spun Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) alloys can maintain amorphous phase because of the high glass-forming ability of B.
In addition, the values of Ms, Hc, μr and Pcv were investigated. Annealed Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 exhibits excellent Ms values above 1.8 T at the various annealing temperatures, Ta and when the Ta is 545 °C, the Ms value reaches maximum of about 2 T, which is higher than that of Finemet or Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys of about 1.5 T with the low Hc value less than 120 A/m. Moreover, the values of μr and Pcv are superior soft magnetic properties compared to the conventional value of Finemet.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and Formal Analysis J.H. and S.K.; Methodology and Resources, S.K.; Validation, J.H., S.K., S.S. and J.S.; Investigation, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation and Visualization, J.H.; Writing—Review & Editing, J.H., S.K., S.S., J.S. and H.C.-Y.; Project Administration and Funding Acquisition H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) (2018006784).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Suryanarayana, C.; Inoue, A. Iron-based bulk metallic glasses. Int. Mater. Rev. 2013, 58, 131–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiles, C.D. Recent advances and future directions in magnetic materials. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 5907–5939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, Z.; Yao, K.; Li, D.; Ni, X.; Lu, Z. Core loss analysis of Finemet type nanocrystalline alloy ribbon with different thickness. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2017, 27, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, H.S. Glassy metals. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1980, 43, 353–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, M. A Brief Overview of Bulk Metallic Glasses. NPG Asia Mater. 2011, 3, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, W.H. Roles of minor additions in formation and properties of bulk metallic glasses. Prog. Mater Sci. 2007, 52, 540–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Manivel Raja, M.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Majumdar, B.; Narayanasamy, A. Structure and soft magnetic properties of Finemet alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2000, 297, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yoshizawa, Y.; Yamauchi, K.; Oguma, S. Fe-base soft magnetic alloy and method of producing same. European Patent Application 0 271 657, 22 June 1988. [Google Scholar]
  9. Herzer, G. Grain structure and magnetism of nanocrystalline ferromagnets. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1989, 25, 3327–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yoshizawa, Y.; Yamauchi, K. Fe-Based Soft Magnetic Alloys Composed of Ultrafine Grain Structure. Mater. Trans. Jpn. Int. Metals 1990, 31, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Herzer, G.; Warlimont, H. Nanocrystalline soft magnetic materials by partial crystallization of amorphous alloys. Nanostruct. Mater. 1992, 1, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yoshizawa, Y.; Oguma, S.; Yamauchi, K. New Fe-based soft magnetic alloys composed of ultrafine grain structure. J. Appl. Phys. 1988, 64, 6044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Makino, A.; Hatani, T.; Naitoh, Y.; Bitoh, T.; Inoue, A.; Masumoto, T. Applications of Nanocrystalline Soft Magnetic Fe-M-B (M = Zr, Nb) Alloys “NANOPERM@”. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1997, 33, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Makino, A.; Men, H.; Kubota, T.; Yubuta, K.; Inoue, A. FeSiBPCu Nanocrystalline Soft Magnetic Alloys with High Bs of 1.9 Tesla Produced by Crystallizing Hetero-Amorphous Phase. Mater. Trans. 2009, 50, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Huang, M.; Hsu, Y.; McHenry, E.; Laughlin, D. Soft magnetic properties of nanocrystalline amorphous HITPERM films and multilayers. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2001, 37, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. FINEMET^TM. 2015. Available online: http://www.hitachi.co.kr/products/material/emc/nano/index.html (accessed on 16 October 2019).
  17. Ohta, M.; Yoshizawa, Y. Magnetic properties of nanocrystalline Fe82.65Cu1.35SixB16−x alloys (x = 0–7). Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 062517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yoshizawa, Y. Magnetic Properties and Microstructure of Nanocrystalline Fe-Based Alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum. 1999, 307, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Herzer, G. Nanocrystalline soft magnetic materials. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1996, 158, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kulik, T. The influence of copper, niobium and tantalum additions on the crystallization of Fe-Si-B-based glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1992, 159, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vazquez, M.; Marin, P.; Davies, H.A.; Olofinjana, A.O. Magnetic hardening of FeSiBCuNb ribbons and wires during the first stage of crystallization to a nanophase structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1994, 64, 3185–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kwon, S.; Kim, S.; Choi-Yim, H.; Kang, K.H.; Yoon, C.S. High saturation magnetic flux density of Novel nanocrystalline core annealed under magnetic field. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 826, 154136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kwon, S.; Kim, S.; Choi-Yim, H. Improvement of saturation magnetic flux density in Fe-Si-B-Nb-Cu nanocomposite alloys by magnetic field annealing. Curr. Appl. Phys 2020, 20, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, W.Z.; Ryder, P.L. X-ray and differential scanning calorimetry study of the crystallization of amorphous Fe73.5 Cu1Nb3 Si13. 5B9 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1995, B34, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The XRD patterns of the Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) as-spun ribbons.
Figure 1. The XRD patterns of the Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) as-spun ribbons.
Metals 10 01297 g001
Figure 2. Hysteresis loops of the as-spun Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10).
Figure 2. Hysteresis loops of the as-spun Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10).
Metals 10 01297 g002
Figure 3. The DSC patterns of (a) the Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and (b) the Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) as-spun ribbons with Finemet (x = 13.5, y = 9).
Figure 3. The DSC patterns of (a) the Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and (b) the Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) as-spun ribbons with Finemet (x = 13.5, y = 9).
Metals 10 01297 g003
Figure 4. Hysteresis loops of the annealed Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1.
Figure 4. Hysteresis loops of the annealed Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1.
Metals 10 01297 g004
Figure 5. Variation of (a) Ms and (b) Hc values measured at 1, 10, and 20 kHz in the annealed ribbons of Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 with increasing Ta.
Figure 5. Variation of (a) Ms and (b) Hc values measured at 1, 10, and 20 kHz in the annealed ribbons of Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 with increasing Ta.
Metals 10 01297 g005
Figure 6. Variation of (a) μr and (b) Pcv values measured at 1, 10 and 20 kHz in the annealed ribbons of Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 with increasing Ta.
Figure 6. Variation of (a) μr and (b) Pcv values measured at 1, 10 and 20 kHz in the annealed ribbons of Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 with increasing Ta.
Metals 10 01297 g006
Table 1. Summary of density (ρ), saturation magnetization (Ms) of the Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) alloys.
Table 1. Summary of density (ρ), saturation magnetization (Ms) of the Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) alloys.
Alloyρ (g/cm3)Ms (emu/g)Ms (T)
Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu17.41165.41.54
Fe83Si1B12Nb3Cu17.38163.51.52
Fe82Si1B13Nb3Cu17.34163.51.51
Fe81Si6B9Nb3Cu17.03175.31.55
Fe79Si8B9Nb3Cu16.86172.41.49
Fe77Si10B9Nb3Cu16.69166.71.40
Table 2. Crystallization temperature (Tx), annealing temperature, and compositions of the Fe95−ySi1ByNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10).
Table 2. Crystallization temperature (Tx), annealing temperature, and compositions of the Fe95−ySi1ByNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10).
Composition (at.%)Tx (°C)Annealing Temperature (°C), 1 h
Fe96−xySixByNb3Cu1
x = 1, y = 11394395445495545
x = 1, y = 12406410460510560
x = 1, y = 13422420470520570
x = 6, y = 9425425475525575
x = 8, y = 9452450450550600
x = 10, y = 9475480530580630
Table 3. Ms and Hc values of the Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 according to Ta.
Table 3. Ms and Hc values of the Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1 according to Ta.
AlloyTa (°C)Ms (emu/g)Ms (T)Hc (A/m)
1 (kHz)1020
Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1as-spun165.41.54
395 °C209.11.95272.96329.01357.94
445 °C203.01.89301.88368.93404.38
495 °C214.11.99207.43278.92318.82
545 °C221.32.06114.52157.18184.83
Table 4. μr and Pcv values of the Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) according to Ta.
Table 4. μr and Pcv values of the Fe95−xSi1BxNb3Cu1 (x = 11, 12, 13) and Fe87−xSixB9Nb3Cu1 (x = 6, 8, 10) according to Ta.
AlloyTa (°C)μrPcv (mW/cm3)
1 (kHz)102011020
Fe84Si1B11Nb3Cu1395650.0645.99645.21519.325920.712,820
445885.5850.67851.63702.148527.918,890
4951025.71024.401025.2532.27166.716,530
5451347.21340.601344.9406.185486.513,120
Fe83Si1B12Nb3Cu1410768.2752.59748.361012.810,90022,680
460917.7915.59916.2631.017970.117,890
5101014.81014.201017.4761.189636.921,780
5601302.71299.401302.4246.833717.59273.9
Fe82Si1B13Nb3Cu1420914.1907.56905.83733.918639.419,130
470741.0736.20735.99707.478142.717,600
5201030.21021.401017.6542.977193.816,280
570590.8534.73532.74379.153051.36138.9
Fe81Si6B9Nb3Cu1425658.9655.32656.33226.533027.57110.6
475758.1754.24756.5240.973523.68359
525812.6810.18812.94281.053864.19154.5
575887.5885.09889.47200.9134758684.9
Fe79Si8B9Nb3Cu1450780.0775.56777.4972.1641819.94913.1
500882.3880.42883.41125.853039.38035.8
5501068.21069.001074.894.1862482.66899.5
600915.5913.35917.54100.422176.35809.6
Fe77Si10B9Nb3Cu1480792.6791.90792.976.7891921.85130.5
530901.2902.98907.1376.2151872.45099.9
5801061.41058.601062.4141.423418.48784.9
6301091.11089.101094.7321.024714.411,250

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, J.; Kwon, S.; Sohn, S.; Schroers, J.; Choi-Yim, H. Optimum Soft Magnetic Properties of the FeSiBNbCu Alloy Achieved by Heat Treatment and Tailoring B/Si Ratio. Metals 2020, 10, 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101297

AMA Style

Han J, Kwon S, Sohn S, Schroers J, Choi-Yim H. Optimum Soft Magnetic Properties of the FeSiBNbCu Alloy Achieved by Heat Treatment and Tailoring B/Si Ratio. Metals. 2020; 10(10):1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Jonghee, Seoyeon Kwon, Sungwoo Sohn, Jan Schroers, and Haein Choi-Yim. 2020. "Optimum Soft Magnetic Properties of the FeSiBNbCu Alloy Achieved by Heat Treatment and Tailoring B/Si Ratio" Metals 10, no. 10: 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101297

APA Style

Han, J., Kwon, S., Sohn, S., Schroers, J., & Choi-Yim, H. (2020). Optimum Soft Magnetic Properties of the FeSiBNbCu Alloy Achieved by Heat Treatment and Tailoring B/Si Ratio. Metals, 10(10), 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10101297

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop