Next Article in Journal
Poorer Intermittent Sprints Performance in Ramadan-Fasted Muslim Footballers despite Controlling for Pre-Exercise Dietary Intake, Sleep and Training Load
Previous Article in Journal
Content Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Nomination Scale for Identifying Football Talent (NSIFT): Application to Coaches, Parents and Players
Open AccessArticle

Effect of Number of Players and Maturity on Ball-Drills Training Load in Youth Basketball

1
Department of Movement, Human and Health Science, Univesity of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Biology, University of Portland, Portland, OR 97203, USA
3
OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 October 2016 / Accepted: 26 December 2016 / Published: 2 January 2017
This study aimed to assess the basketball ball-drills workload analyzing: (1) the effect of varying the number of players involved on physiological and technical demands; (2) the temporal changes in players’ responses across bouts; and (3) the relationship of players’ workload with their maturation status and training age. Twelve young male basketball players (mean ± SD; age 13.9 ± 0.7 years; height 1.76 ± 0.06 m; body mass 65.7 ± 12.5 kg; HRmax 202 ± 8 beat·min−1) completed three bouts of 4 min interspersed by 2 min of passive recovery of two vs. two and four vs. four ball-drills. The mean percentage of HRmax (%HRmax) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected. Technical actions (TAs) (dribbles, passes, shots, interceptions, steals, rebounds, and turnovers) were calculated through notational analysis. Players’ genitalia development (GD) and pubic hair (PH) growth were assessed using Tanner scale. Results showed a higher %HRmax (p = 0.018), RPE (p = 0.042), dribbles (p = 0.007), shots (p = 0.003), and rebounds (p = 0.006) in two vs. two compared to four vs. four condition. Furthermore, a statistical difference was found for %HRmax (p = 0.005) and number of passes (p = 0.020) between bouts. In addition, no correlation between GD, PH, and training age with %HRmax, RPE, and TAs was found. These findings suggest that variations of the number of players involved affect ball-drills workload and that ball-drills training intensity varies across bouts. Finally, ball-drills elicit an adequate training stimulus, regardless of players’ maturation status and training age. View Full-Text
Keywords: small-sided games; basketball conditioning; basketball training; maturation status small-sided games; basketball conditioning; basketball training; maturation status
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Conte, D.; Favero, T.; Niederhausen, M.; Capranica, L.; Tessitore, A. Effect of Number of Players and Maturity on Ball-Drills Training Load in Youth Basketball. Sports 2017, 5, 3.

AMA Style

Conte D, Favero T, Niederhausen M, Capranica L, Tessitore A. Effect of Number of Players and Maturity on Ball-Drills Training Load in Youth Basketball. Sports. 2017; 5(1):3.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Conte, Daniele; Favero, Terence; Niederhausen, Meike; Capranica, Laura; Tessitore, Antonio. 2017. "Effect of Number of Players and Maturity on Ball-Drills Training Load in Youth Basketball" Sports 5, no. 1: 3.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop