Next Article in Journal
Early Rate of Force Development and Maximal Strength at Different Positions of the Athletic Shoulder Test in Baseball Players
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Analysis of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Strength and Plyometric Training: An Integrated Modeling Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Incidence of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery and Revision in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Institute for Research on Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine, Valencia Catholic University, 46001 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sports 2025, 13(9), 299; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090299
Submission received: 4 July 2025 / Revised: 8 August 2025 / Accepted: 22 August 2025 / Published: 1 September 2025

Abstract

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries are a major concern in baseball because of repetitive valgus stress from overhead throwing, often leading to surgical intervention. In recent years, UCL reconstruction has become increasingly frequent. Although this procedure has a high success rate, revision surgery is often required. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the incidence of UCL surgery and revision procedures in baseball players, explored potential risk factors, and identified areas for future research. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Embase, and SportDiscus databases was conducted for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Studies reporting the incidence of primary and revision UCL reconstructions in baseball players were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). A meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software calculated the pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals for UCL surgery and revision rates. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, including data from 27,366 baseball players. The pooled incidence of UCL surgery was 4.52% (95% CI: 4.20–4.84%), and the pooled incidence of revision surgery was 8.42% (95% CI: 5.49–11.35%). Statistical analyses showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 100%, p < 0.00001). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results, both in the incidence of surgery and in the revision surgery. UCL surgery is a common procedure in baseball, and a notable proportion of athletes require revision. Further research is necessary to identify the risk factors and develop preventive strategies to reduce UCL injury rates.
Keywords: baseball; elbow; ulnar collateral ligament; UCL injury; incidence; UCL reconstruction; Tommy John surgery; epidemiology; meta-analysis baseball; elbow; ulnar collateral ligament; UCL injury; incidence; UCL reconstruction; Tommy John surgery; epidemiology; meta-analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sáez, A.; Mariscal, G.; Barrios, C. Incidence of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery and Revision in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports 2025, 13, 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090299

AMA Style

Sáez A, Mariscal G, Barrios C. Incidence of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery and Revision in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports. 2025; 13(9):299. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090299

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sáez, Alberto, Gonzalo Mariscal, and Carlos Barrios. 2025. "Incidence of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery and Revision in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Sports 13, no. 9: 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090299

APA Style

Sáez, A., Mariscal, G., & Barrios, C. (2025). Incidence of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery and Revision in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports, 13(9), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13090299

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop