Next Article in Journal
Ground Reaction Forces, Asymmetries and Performance of Change of Direction Tasks in Youth Elite Female Basketball Players
Previous Article in Journal
Medicalization of Sport? A Mixed-Method Study on the Use of Medications in Elite Ice Hockey
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sports
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/sports12010020
sports-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of the Sports Psychological Profile, Competitive Anxiety, Self-Confidence and Flow State in Young Football Players

by
José A. Domínguez-González
,
Rafael E. Reigal
*,
Verónica Morales-Sánchez
and
Antonio Hernández-Mendo
Department of Social Psychology, Social Anthropology, Social Work and Social Services, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sports 2024, 12(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12010020
Submission received: 12 December 2023 / Revised: 4 January 2024 / Accepted: 5 January 2024 / Published: 8 January 2024
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to analyse the correlations among the sports psychological profile, competitive anxiety, self-confidence and the flow state of young football players. Additionally, potential distinctions based on age category, competitive level and field position were explored. This study included 328 participants divided into two groups: Group 1, 14–15 year olds, and Group 2, 16–18 year olds (M = 15.85; SD = 1.44). Data were collected by using the Psychological Inventory of Sports Execution (IPED), the Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2R) and the Flow State Scale (FSS). The findings revealed positive associations between the sports psychological profile and self-confidence, as well as with the flow state. Conversely, competitive anxiety demonstrated negative relationships with the sports psychological profile, self-confidence and the state of flow. Moreover, superior scores were observed in the analysed variables for the older age category and higher competitive level, with no notable disparities based on field positions. These results underscore the interplay of psychological factors in the performance of football players and underline distinctions among players according to their category (age and level). This emphasises the importance of scrutinising these variables in athletes to comprehend their profiles and enable targeted interventions aimed at enhancing their psychological resources for competitive scenarios.

1. Introduction

In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the significance of developing psychological skills in athletes, as they constitute a fundamental element in achieving athletic success and advancement [1]. These skills empower athletes to adapt more effectively to competitive environments, even in high-stress and anxiety-inducing situations [2,3]. Notably, several extensively studied variables include group cohesion, self-control, anxiety, stress, emotional state, motivation, activation level, attention and self-confidence [4,5].
With the objective of encompassing a comprehensive array of influential factors in athletes’ performance, the Psychological Inventory of Sports Execution (IPED) was conceived [6]. This instrument evaluates various facets, including self-confidence, negative coping control, attentional control, visuoimaginative control, motivational level, positive coping control and attitudinal control [6]. The utility of this tool has been demonstrated in studies such as that of Garit et al. [7], wherein they correlated IPED factors with competitive anxiety and the injury history of high-performance athletes. In a similar vein, Reigal et al. [8] correlated the sports psychological profile (IPED) with competitive anxiety, mood and self-efficacy in beach handball players. The study concluded that the sports psychological profile has predictive capabilities for competitive anxiety, moods and self-efficacy.
The IPED has been specifically employed in the domain of football to assess the psychological variables pertinent to sports practice, both in youth and adults [9]. However, in grassroots football, there is a dearth of research on the psychological aspects influencing the development of sporting talent [10]. It is imperative to conduct such investigations on young athletes for two primary reasons. Firstly, the cultivation of psychological skills necessitates adaptation and learning over time. Secondly, the stress associated with competition can have detrimental effects on young athletes [11].
Football is a dynamic sport characterised by a myriad of interactions [12]. This dynamic can give rise to situations marked by high levels of stress and anxiety, which can adversely impact the attainment of athletes’ objectives [13,14]. Competitive anxiety, in particular, is one of the most extensively examined variables in football due to its profound influence on athlete performance [15,16]. It is defined as a negative emotional response to the demands of competition, encompassing both somatic (physiological) and cognitive (mental) components [17,18].
Another focal point of research in the realm of football is self-confidence [19,20]. This attribute exerts a significant influence on the sporting endeavours of young athletes [21,22]. Self-confidence is defined as an athlete’s belief in his or her own capacity to achieve optimal performance [23]. Consequently, athlete preparation assumes paramount importance as it directly impacts his or her level of self-confidence [21,24]. By bolstering an athlete’s psychological resources, self-confidence and self-perception can be fortified, thereby enhancing his or her capacity to adapt to training and competition [25,26].
On the other hand, in competitive contexts, the so-called flow state has been emphasized, characterised as an optimal psychological state wherein athletes can attain their highest level of performance [27]. Flow is defined as a subjective experience where athletes perceive a seamless alignment between the demands of sports practice and their ability to navigate them, creating an optimal state for sports performance [28]. Additionally, flow is associated with positive outcomes for athletes, including enhanced experience and subjective well-being, acting as a mediator between the two [28,29,30].
Moreover, psychological variables influencing sports performance may be influenced by factors such as the athletes’ age and their competitive level [10,31,32]. So, more experienced and higher-level athletes, having developed better psychological resources to adapt to the competitive environment, may demonstrate greater abilities to cope with the stressful situations inherent to sports [33,34]. Athletes, with their increased maturity, may perceive the demands of the game more effectively, enabling them to provide more efficient responses throughout the course of sporting activities [35].
Although multiple psychological variables have been studied in adolescent soccer players, there are few studies that have explored a broad psychological profile in this population. Furthermore, until now, no research has been found that evaluates these variables by age category, competitive level and position on the field. Given the critical importance of these variables and their impact on the well-being, performance and sports experience of young athletes, the objective of this study was to analyse the relationships among the sports psychological profile, competitive anxiety, self-confidence and the flow state in young football players. Additionally, we aimed to explore potential distinctions based on age category, competitive level and position on the field.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design

This research follows an associative, comparative and predictive strategy [36]. A single evaluation of a set of psychological variables was carried out, in addition to various sociodemographic and sports characteristics of the sample.

2.2. Participants

The sample consisted of 328 participants divided into two groups: Group 1, 14–15 year olds, and Group 2, 16–18 year olds (M = 15.85; SD = 1.44), belonging to different sports entities in the province of Málaga (Spain). Group 1 consisted of 172 players with a mean age of 14.72 years (SD = 0.66). Group 2 consisted of 156 players with a mean age of 17.11 years (SD = 0.92). According to the competitive level (the league in which they compete), Group A (n = 138) was composed of the Division of Honor, National League and First Andalusian League, with an average age of 16.27 years (SD = 1.42). Group B (n = 190) consisted of the Second Andalusian League, Third Andalusian League and Fourth Andalusian League, with an average age of 15.55 years (SD = 1.38). Regarding the position on the field, there were 31 goalkeepers (M = 15.77; SD = 1.61), 111 defenders (M = 15.93; SD = 1.46), 89 midfielders (M = 15.84; SD = 1.47) and 97 forwards (M = 15.80; SD = 1.34). The inclusion criteria were being registered with any of the participating sports entities in the study and belonging to any age group mentioned above. The exclusion criteria were having any psychological disorders or using any medication that could interfere with the study.

2.3. Instruments

Psychological Inventory of Sport Performance (IPED) [6,37]. This questionnaire is the adaptation in Spanish of the Psychological Performance Inventory (PPI) [38,39] and is used to assess the athlete’s psychological profile. It consists of 42 items and seven factors: self-confidence, negative coping control, attentional control, visuoimaginative control, motivational level, positive coping control and attitudinal control. A Likert scale ranging from 1 “Almost never” to 5 “Almost always” is used to respond to this questionnaire. The internal consistency for this study (Cronbach’s Alpha) was as follows: self-confidence (α = 0.71), negative coping control (α = 0.69), attentional control (α = 0.73), visuoimaginative control (α = 0.70), motivational level (α = 0.74), positive coping control (α = 0.78) and attitudinal control (α = 0.77).
Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2R) [40]. This questionnaire is a revision of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) by Martens et al. [41] and is used to assess competitive anxiety. It consists of 17 items and three factors: cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety and self-confidence. A Likert scale ranging from 1 “Not at all” to 4 “Very much” is used to respond to this questionnaire. The internal consistency for this study (Cronbach’s Alpha) was as follows: cognitive anxiety (α = 0.72), somatic anxiety (α = 0.78) and self-confidence (α = 0.82).
The Flow State Scale (FSS) [42]. This questionnaire assesses the optimal psychological state (flow) for sports performance. It consists of 36 items and nine factors: balance between skill level and challenge, action-awareness merging, clear goals, direct and immediate feedback, concentration on the task at hand, sense of control, loss of self-consciousness or inhibition, distortion of the sense of time and autotelic experience. A Likert-type scale ranging from 1 “Strongly Disagree” to 5 “Strongly Agree” is used to respond to this questionnaire. The internal consistency for this study (Cronbach’s Alpha) was as follows: balance between skill level and challenge (α = 0.76), action-awareness merging (α = 0.73), clear goals (α = 0.79), direct and immediate feedback (α = 0.82), concentration on the task at hand (α = 0.81), sense of control (α = 0.80), loss of self-consciousness or inhibition (α = 0.76), distortion of the sense of time (α = 0.73) and autotelic experience (α = 0.81).

2.4. Procedure

The sample was selected from various sports entities belonging to the province of Málaga (Spain). A nonprobabilistic and convenience sampling method was used. Firstly, permission was sought from the management of the clubs. Upon approval, the objectives and characteristics of the research were explained to each club coordinator and the team coaches. Subsequently, informed consent was obtained from the players and their parents/legal guardians, and data collection was carried out.
Initially, a meeting was held with the players to explain the purpose of the investigation. Information was given about the types of questionnaires that had to be carried out and how they had to be completed. After that, they were sent a link to a Google Forms form containing the questionnaires they had to fill out. It took approximately 45 min to complete the set of questionnaires. Players were given contact information in case they had any questions during the process of completing the questionnaires. The research was carried out in the months of April and May of the 2022/2023 season.
Throughout the process, the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration [43] were respected. Furthermore, this research had the approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Málaga (N. 9; CEUMA Registry N. 24-2023-H).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data underwent descriptive and inferential analyses. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of the data. Subsequently, a correlation analysis was conducted by using the Spearman’s Rho test. Then, a cluster analysis (k-means) was performed based on the FSS questionnaire variables to generate two groups and analyse the differences between them in terms of the different study variables. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine the differences between these clusters. Furthermore, a binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict membership in each of the generated groups through the cluster analysis by using the dimensions of the IPED questionnaire and the CSAI-2R as predictor variables. In the logistic regression analysis, conducted by using the Forward Conditional method, the Hosmer–Lemeshow and Omnibus tests were conducted to assess the model’s goodness of fit. SPSS software v.24 was used for data processing.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of the Relationships among Sports Psychological Profile (IPED), Competitive Anxiety (CSAI-2R), Self-Confidence (IPED/CSAI-2R) and the Flow State (FSS) in Young Football Players

Table 1 shows descriptive statistics for the analysed variables. Additionally, the skewness and kurtosis values ranged from −0.98 to 0.65 and from −0.86 to 0.45, respectively. However, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test indicated issues with normality. Also, Table 1 shows the correlation analyses conducted by using the Spearman test. As observed, the psychological profile (IPED) positively correlates with the self-confidence of the CSAI-2R and with the variables of the FSS and negatively with cognitive and somatic anxiety. Likewise, the dimensions of the FSS correlate negatively with cognitive and somatic anxiety, as well as positively with the self-confidence of the CSAI-2R. Only the variable time distortion in the FSS differs from the pattern of relationships of the set of variables, showing a positive relationship with cognitive anxiety and virtually no statistically significant relationships with the different factors of the IPED.

3.2. Cluster Analysis

Two clusters were generated (k-means) from the nine dimensions of the FSS. Group 1 (n = 140) was characterized by lower values in the dimensions of the FSS, and Group 2 (n = 188) had higher scores in the FSS (Figure 1; Table 2). Each case in the clusters was well classified, given that the maximum distance (2.96) from each of them to the centre of their group was less than the distance between the centres of the clusters (3.09). Descriptive statistics of the generated clusters are shown in Table 2. Additionally, the skewness and kurtosis values ranged from −1.65 to 0.83 and from −0.99 to 2.14, respectively. However, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were significant in all cases (except for negative coping control of the IPED for Group 1; K-S = 0.07, p > 0.05), indicating issues with normality in most of the data distributions. The conducted tests (Table 2) indicated statistically significant differences in favour of Group 2 in all factors.

3.3. Logistic Regression Analysis

Binary logistic regression analysis (Forward Conditional) was conducted by using the dimensions of the IPED and CSAI-2R as predictor variables and the two clusters formed from the dimensions of the FSS as the criterion variable. The internal coding of the model assumes cluster 1 (worse profile in the FSS questionnaire) as condition 0 and cluster 2 (better profile in the FSS questionnaire) as condition 1. Therefore, the generation of a statistically significant model would indicate its ability to predict membership in cluster 2 (condition 1 of the model) based on the established predictors.
The binary logistic regression analysis generated a model with four steps (Table 3). The model explained 45% of the variance (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.45), correctly classified 76% of the cases and had a significant Omnibus test value (χ2 = 134.16, p < 0.001) and a nonsignificant Hosmer–Lemeshow test value (χ2 = 5.47, p > 0.05), indicating a good fit of the model.

3.4. Analysis of the Sports Psychological Profile (IPED), Competitive Anxiety (CSAI-2R), Self-Confidence (IPED/CSAI-2R) and Flow State (FSS) Based on Age Category, Competitive Level and Position on the Field

Table 4 presents the mean and standard deviation of the study variables based on the age category and the competitive level. Additionally, the skewness and kurtosis values ranged from −1.19 to 0.79 and from −0.91 to 1.32, respectively. But, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test highlighted issues of normality in the majority of the variables. Hence, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyse the differences between groups.
As shown in Table 4, the 16–18 year olds exhibited superior values in the IPED variables: self-confidence, visuoimaginative and attitudinal control. Conversely, they displayed lower cognitive anxiety and higher self-confidence in the CSAI-2R. Furthermore, they demonstrated better scores in the FSS for the variables: skill and challenge, action and awareness, direct comments and sense of control.
On the other hand, the DH/LN/1st group displayed superior and statistically significant values in the IPED variables: self-confidence, negative coping, visuoimaginative, positive coping and attitudinal control. Moreover, they exhibited lower somatic anxiety and higher self-confidence in the CSAI-2R. Additionally, they demonstrated statistically significant better scores in the FSS for the variables ability and challenge, clear goal, direct and clear feedback, concentration on the task and sense of control.
Table 5 displays the mean and standard deviation of the study variables based on the playing position (goalkeeper vs. defender vs. midfielder vs. forward). The skewness values ranged from −1.69 to 0.99, and the kurtosis values ranged from −1.23 to 2.82. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test indicated issues with normality in most variables. Therefore, the Kruskal–Wallis test was employed to analyse differences between groups, with no significant differences observed.

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between the sports psychological profile, competitive anxiety, self-confidence and the flow state in young footballers. Additionally, we examined potential differences based on age category, competitive level and position on the field. The results revealed significant correlations among the sports psychological profile, competitive anxiety, self-confidence and the flow state. Moreover, notable distinctions were observed based on age category, favouring the junior players, and competitive level, favouring those at a higher level (DH/LN/1st). However, no statistically significant differences were found based on playing position.
Regarding the relationships among factors, positive associations were identified between the sports psychological profile, self-confidence and the flow state. This suggests that athletes with higher scores in psychological skills, as assessed by the IPED, tend to exhibit more favourable scores in variables conducive to adapting to the competitive environment, such as lower competitive anxiety and heightened self-confidence. These findings corroborate previous research that has emphasised these associations across various sports [44,45,46].
Furthermore, the results indicated that a superior sports psychological profile and lower competitive anxiety are also linked with a heightened flow state. This is consistent with prior studies [47,48,49]. Additionally, Hut et al. [50] detailed in their study that mental training, in addition to improving the sports psychological profile and enhancing the connection with the task at hand, reduces athletes’ levels of competitive anxiety, leading to greater well-being and enjoyment in sports practice. These findings align with the present research, underscoring the significance of bolstering the development of psychological resources in young athletes to enhance their well-being and performance in these contexts.
Moreover, older athletes demonstrated a superior psychological profile, competitive anxiety, self-confidence and flow state compared to their younger counterparts. This can be attributed to their greater maturity and accumulated sports experience. Goncalves et al. [35] examined the relationship between maturity and signal-detection skills in a sample of young football players, concluding that more mature players can perceive the game more swiftly and securely, leading to more effective responses. Similarly, López et al. [34] found in their study that players with greater sports experience possessed enhanced cognitive resources to manage stress and potential negative evaluations of their performance.
In addition, players competing at a higher level exhibited a superior psychological profile, competitive anxiety, self-confidence and flow state compared to those competing at a lower level. Castillo-Rodríguez, Hernández-Mendo et al. [51] concluded in their study that athletes at a higher competitive level experience less anxiety and greater self-confidence compared to athletes at a lower competitive level. Athletes who excel are those who effectively use their cognitive and volitional skills [33], so it is likely that this enhanced management of skills allows athletes to reach higher competitive levels.
The psychological aspect is considered as a critical factor in an athlete’s sporting success, alongside technique, tactics and physical ability [52,53]. Based on the results of this study, it is deemed important to focus on psychological skills in the lower categories, as there may be footballers with commendable technical–tactical proficiency and excellent physical condition who could benefit greatly from a fortified psychological profile, enhanced anxiety management, greater self-confidence and an elevated flow state.
Finally, as for the limitations of this study, despite having a substantial sample size, access to an even larger number of athletes could have potentially yielded more precise results for the population. Additionally, the subgroups into which the total sample was divided (14–15 year olds; 16–18 year olds; DH/LN/1st, 2nd/3rd/4th; and playing position) did not have an equal number of athletes. Therefore, for future interventions, it would be beneficial to increase the sample size and strive for a more balanced distribution of athletes across each subgroup to obtain more comprehensive results. Moreover, including under 14 categories in future studies could offer valuable insights into potential differences compared to the analysed categories. Finally, an issue that has not been analysed and that could be important is the starting or substitute status of the athletes and the time each of them plays. This could affect psychological issues such as self-confidence, the athletes’ coping skills or their level of motivation. Therefore, it is suggested to incorporate these analyses in future studies to explore how these psychological variables behave.

5. Conclusions

The results obtained reveal that the psychological sports profile is positively related to self-confidence and the flow state. Likewise, competitive anxiety is negatively related to the psychological sports profile, self-confidence and the state of flow. On the other hand, the results show better scores in the analysed variables in favour of the older age category and competitive level, although not by positions on the playing field. This suggests the need to analyse these variables in athletes, with the aim of understanding their profile and being able to intervene with them to improve their psychological resources to face competition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.D.-G., R.E.R., V.M.-S. and A.H.-M.; methodology, J.A.D.-G., R.E.R., V.M.-S. and A.H.-M.; formal analysis, J.A.D.-G., R.E.R., V.M.-S. and A.H.-M.; investigation, J.A.D.-G., R.E.R., V.M.-S. and A.H.-M.; resources, J.A.D.-G., R.E.R., V.M.-S. and A.H.-M.; data curation, J.A.D.-G., R.E.R., V.M.-S. and A.H.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A.D.-G., R.E.R., V.M.-S. and A.H.-M.; writing—review and editing, J.A.D.-G., R.E.R., V.M.-S. and A.H.-M.; supervision, A.H.-M. and R.E.R.; project administration, J.A.D.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Málaga (N. 9; CEUMA Registry N. 24-2023-H).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request to the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dean, F.; Kavanagh, E.; Wilding, A.; Rees, T. An Examination of the Experiences of Practitioners Delivering Sport Psychology Services within English Premier League Soccer Academies. Sports 2022, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lochbaum, M.; Stoner, E.; Hefner, T.; Cooper, S.; Lane, A.M.; Terry, P.C. Sport psychology and performance meta-analyses: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pettersen, S.D.; Adolfsen, F.; Martinussen, M. Psychological factors and performance in women’s football: A systematic review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2022, 32, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Palicio Mayoral, R.; Rodríguez-Martínez, D.; León-Zarceño, E. Programas de Intervención Psicológica con atletas para la mejora del rendimiento: Una revisión actual. Rev. Psicol. Apl. Dep. Ejerc. Fís. 2022, 17, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, N.; Yan, W.; Sun, M.; Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Chi, L. Applying skill-oriented and spirit-oriented psychological training to Chinese national archery team athletes: A single-case mixed-methods study. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2023, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hernández-Mendo, A. Cuestionario para la evaluación psicológica de la ejecución deportiva: Estudio complementario entre TCT y TRI. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2006, 15, 71–93. [Google Scholar]
  7. Garit, J.R.; Surita, Y.P.; Domínguez, E.F.; Moya, Y.S.; Castellanos, R.B. Anxiety and psychological variables of sports performance related to injuries in high-performance sportsmen. Apunts Sports Med. 2021, 56, 100358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reigal, R.E.; Vázquez-Diz, J.A.; Morillo-Baro, J.P.; Hernández-Mendo, A.; Morales-Sánchez, V. Psychological profile, competitive anxiety, moods and self-efficacy in beach handball players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tassi, J.M.; Fajardo, M.Á.L.; García, J.D.; Calvo, T.G.; Ponce, I.G. Attentional focus in team sports: Effects of an intervention program on football players. Eur. J. Hum. Mov. 2023, 50, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sarmento, H.; Anguera, M.T.; Pereira, A.; Araújo, D. Talent identification and development in male football: A systematic review. Sports Med. 2018, 48, 907–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vélez, M.; Jiménez-Torres, M.G.; Navarrón, E.; Godoy-Izquierdo, D.; Ramírez-Molina, M.J. Implementación de una intervención psicológica en fútbol base, satisfacción subjetiva de los deportistas y experiencias de pasión, competencia percibida y compromiso deportivo en relación con la intención de práctica futura. Rev. Iberoam. Psicol. Ejerc. Dep. 2017, 12, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sabarit, A.; Morillo Baro, J.P.; Reigal, R.E.; Vázquez Diz, J.A.; Hernández Mendo, A.; Morales-Sánchez, V. Analysis of Game Actions and Performance in Young Soccer Players: A Study Using Sequential Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bennett, J.; Maynard, I. Performance blocks in sport: Recommendations for treatment and implications for sport psychology practitioners. J. Sport Psychol. Action 2017, 8, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brown, D.J.; Fletcher, D. Effects of psychological and psychosocial interventions on sport performance: A meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 77–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arroyo del Bosque, R.; Moral García, J.E.; González Rodríguez, O.; Arruza Gabilondo, A. Influencia del resultado en la ansiedad de futbolistas iniciados. Rev. Iberoam. Cienc. Act. Fís. Dep. 2022, 11, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. de Souza, G.; dos Santos, W.; Paes, P.; Fidelix, Y.; de Paula Oliveira, L.; da Costa, M.; dos Santos, W. Consequences of COVID-19 preventive measures on anxiety, stress and depression in football athletes. Soccer Soc. 2022, 23, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martens, R.; Vealey, R.S.; Burton, D. Competitive Anxiety in Sport; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pinto, M.F.; Vázquez, N. Ansiedad estado competitiva y estrategias de afrontamiento: Su relación con el rendimiento en una muestra argentina de jugadores amateurs de golf. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2013, 22, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  19. Castillo-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Sánchez, E.; Martins, F.; Onetti-Onetti, W. Rating of perceived exertion, anxiety and self-confidence in semi-professional soccer players. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2022, 54, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morales-Sánchez, V.; Caballero-Cerbán, M.; Postigo-Martín, C.; Morillo-Baro, J.P.; Hernández-Mendo, A.; Reigal, R.E. Perceived Motivational Climate Determines Self-Confidence and Precompetitive Anxiety in Young Soccer Players: Analysis by Gender. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chun, D.R.; Lee, M.Y.; Kim, S.W.; Cho, E.Y.; Lee, B.H. The Mediated Effect of Sports Confidence on Competitive State Anxiety and Perceived Performance of Basketball Game. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jaramillo, A.; Mayorga-Lascano, M.; Moreta-Herrera, R. Ansiedad competitiva y autoeficacia en tenistas de alto rendimiento antes y después de una competencia. Rev. Guillermo Ockham 2020, 18, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. da Silva Silva, L.G.; Ferreira, R.W.; Gaia, J.W.P.; Pires, D.A. Ansiedade pré-competitiva em atletas de voleibol amador. Retos Nuevas Tend. Educ. Física Deporte Recreación 2022, 46, 574–580. [Google Scholar]
  24. Thomas, O.; Thrower, S.N.; Lane, A.; Thomas, J. Types, sources, and debilitating factors of sport confidence in elite early adolescent academy soccer players. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2021, 33, 192–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cheng, F. Pre-Competition Psychological training in college jumping athletes. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte 2023, 29, e2022_0637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mercader-Rubio, I.; Gutiérrez Ángel, N.; Silva, S.; Moisao, A.; Brito-Costa, S. Relationships between somatic anxiety, cognitive Anxiety, self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence levels in university physical education students. Front. Psychol. 2023, 13, 1059432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, B.; Ding, C.; Shi, H.; Fan, F.; Guo, L. Assessment of Psychological Zone of Optimal Performance among Professional Athletes: EGA and Item Response Theory Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sánchez Vara, A.; Chamorro, J.L.; Moreno Castellanos, R.; Alcaraz, S. Measuring optimal psychological states: Proposal of two brief versions to measure flow and clutch in athletes. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1066494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goddard, S.G.; Stevens, C.J.; Swann, C. Exploring runners’ perspectives of potential strategies for flow interventions. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2023, 35, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boudreau, P.; Mackenzie, S.H.; Hodge, K. Optimal psychological states in advanced climbers: Antecedents, characteristics, and consequences of flow and clutch states. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2022, 60, 102155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Quintero-Ovalle, C.; Madiedo-Parra, M.; Torres-Avendaño, M.J.; Londoño-Salazar, J.; ToroMarin, M.P.; Latorre-Niño, S.; Riveros, F. Relación entre características psicológicas asociadas al rendimiento deportivo, con variables sociodemográficas y deportivas, en una muestra de deportistas colombianos. J. Sport Health Res. 2023, 15, 215–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ramírez, A.; Andreu, J.M.P. Análisis de las habilidades psicológicas en los deportistas promesas y talentos guipuzcoanos. Retos 2021, 39, 465–470. [Google Scholar]
  33. García Pazmiño, M.; García Ucha, F.; Arévalo García, N.; García Pazmiño, S. Presiones Deportivas y Disposición Óptima Combativa (Sports Pressures and Optimal Combative Disposition). Retos 2018, 35, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. López, M.G.; González, J.; Gallegos, A.G. Características psicológicas para el rendimiento deportivo en jugadores adolescentes de balonmano. J. Sport Health Res. 2021, 13, 393–404. [Google Scholar]
  35. Goncalves, E.; Noce, F.; Barbosa, M.A.M.; Figueiredo, A.J.; Teoldo, I. Maturation, signal detection, and tactical behavior of young soccer players in the game context. Sci. Med. Football 2021, 5, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ato, M.; López-García, J.J.; Benavente, A. Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales Psicol. 2013, 29, 1038–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hernández-Mendo, A.; Morales-Sánchez, V.; Peñalver, I. Replicación de las propiedades psicométricas del Inventario Psicológico de Ejecución Deportiva. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2014, 23, 311–324. [Google Scholar]
  38. Loehr, J.E. Mental Toughness Training for Sports: Achieving Athletic Excellence; Stephen Greene Press: Lexington, KY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  39. Loehr, J.E. The Mental Game; Plum Book: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cox, R.H.; Martens, M.P.; Russell, W.D. Measuring Anxiety in Athletics: The Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory–2. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2003, 25, 519–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martens, R.; Burton, D.; Vealey, R.S.; Bump, L.A.; Smith, D.E. Development and validation of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. In Competitive Anxiety in Sport; Martens, R., Vealey, R.S., Burton, D., Eds.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 1990; pp. 127–140. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jackson, S.A.; Marsh, H. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1996, 18, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Morillo Baro, J.P.; Reigal Garrido, R.E.; Hernández-Mendo, A. Relaciones entre el perfil psicológico deportivo y la ansiedad competitiva en jugadores de balonmano playa. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2016, 25, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  45. Reigal, R.E.; Delgado-Giralt, J.; Lopez-Cazorla, R.; Hernandez-Mendo, A. Psychological sport profile and competitive state anxiety in triathletes. Rev. Psicol. Deporte 2018, 27, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sosa, H.R.; Otáñe, Y.E.S.; Dávila, C.J.B. Flow en deportistas mexicanos de alto rendimiento: Su relación con aspectos intrínsecos y aptitudinales. Act. Psicol. 2023, 37, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moreno-Fernández, I.M.; Gómez-Espejo, V.; Olmedilla-Caballero, B.; Ramos-Pastrana, L.M.; Ortega-Toro, E.; Olmedilla-Zafra, A. Eficacia de un programa de preparación psicológica en jugadores jóvenes de fútbol. Rev. Psicol. Apl. Dep. Ejerc. Fís. 2019, 4, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pagani, E.; Gavazzoni, N.; Bernardelli, G.; Malacarne, M.; Solaro, N.; Giusti, E.; Castelnuovo, G.; Volpi, P.; Carimati, G.; Lucini, D. Psychological Intervention Based on Mental Relaxation to Manage Stress in Female Junior Elite Soccer Team: Improvement in Cardiac Autonomic Control, Perception of Stress and Overall Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vidic, Z.; Cherup, N.P. Take me into the ball game: An examination of a brief psychological skills training and mindfulness-based intervention with baseball players. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2022, 20, 612–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hut, M.; Minkler, T.O.; Glass, C.R.; Weppner, C.H.; Thomas, H.M.; Flannery, C.B. A randomized controlled study of mindful sport performance enhancement and psychological skills training with collegiate track and field athletes. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2023, 35, 284–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Castillo-Rodríguez, A.; Hernández-Mendo, A.; Alvero-Cruz, J.R.; Onetti-Onetti, W.; Fernández-García, J.C. Level of precompetitive anxiety and self-confidence in high level Padel players. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 890828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arthur, R.A.; Fitzwater, J.; Roberts, R.; Hardy, J.; Arthur, C.A. Psychological skills and “the paras”: The indirect effects of psychological skills on endurance. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2017, 29, 449–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Blecharz, J.; Wrześniewski, K.; Siekańska, M.; Ambroży, T.; Spieszny, M. Cognitive factors in elite handball: Do players’ positions determine their cognitive processes? J. Hum. Kinet. 2022, 82, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sports 12 00020 g001
Figure 1. Clusters formed from the nine dimensions of the FSS. Groups: grey colour = higher level of FSS; black colour = lower level of FSS. HD = ability level and challenge; AC = action and challenge; MC = clear goals; CDC = direct and clear feedback; CT = concentration on the task; SC = sense of control; PC = loss of self-consciousness; DT = distortion of the sense of time; and EA = autotelic experience.
Figure 1. Clusters formed from the nine dimensions of the FSS. Groups: grey colour = higher level of FSS; black colour = lower level of FSS. HD = ability level and challenge; AC = action and challenge; MC = clear goals; CDC = direct and clear feedback; CT = concentration on the task; SC = sense of control; PC = loss of self-consciousness; DT = distortion of the sense of time; and EA = autotelic experience.
Sports 12 00020 g001
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and Spearman test correlation for sports psychological profile (IPED), competitive anxiety (CSAI-2R), self-confidence (IPED/CSAI-2R) and the flow state (FSS) in young football players.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and Spearman test correlation for sports psychological profile (IPED), competitive anxiety (CSAI-2R), self-confidence (IPED/CSAI-2R) and the flow state (FSS) in young football players.
MSD123456789101112131415161718
1. AC (IPED)4.010.62-
2. CAN (IPED)3.450.610.45 c-
3. CAT (IPED)3.580.580.42 c0.58 c-
4. CVI (IPED)3.690.710.35 c0.16 b0.19 b-
5. NM (IPED)4.240.570.53 c0.27 c0.29 c0.47 c-
6. CAP (IPED)4.090.550.65 c0.49 c0.47 c0.45 c0.63 c-
7. CACT (IPED)3.930.570.67 c0.50 c0.53 c0.45 c0.58 c0.68 c-
8. AN-C (CSAI-2R)2.930.66−0.21 c−0.45 c−0.38 c0.040.07−0.12 a−0.19 b-
9. AN-S (CSAI-2R)1.800.53−0.21 c−0.50 c−0.43 c−0.06−0.17 b−0.30 c−0.30 c0.38 c-
10. CONF (CSAI-2R)3.360.580.69 c0.45 c0.42 c0.37 c0.49 c0.62 c0.65 c−0.25 c−0.28 c-
11. HD (FSS)3.860.780.52 c0.41 c0.33 c0.33 c0.39 c0.48 c0.52 c−0.19 b−0.19 b0.59 c-
12. AC (FSS)3.630.790.31 c0.19 b0.11 a0.25 c0.23 c0.31 c0.34 c−0.040.010.36 c0.55 c-
13. MC (FSS)4.190.720.45 c0.39 c0.38 c0.39 c0.49 c0.56 c0.58 c−0.06−0.29 c0.59 c0.71 c0.49 c-
14. CDC (FSS)3.850.820.44 c0.33 c0.28 c0.28 c0.41 c0.43 c0.47 c−0.11−0.13 a0.53 c0.72 c0.55 c0.70 c-
15. CT (FSS)4.130.770.41 c0.38 c0.44 c0.31 c0.44 c0.54 c0.55 c−0.11 a−0.31 c0.50 c0.65 c0.44 c0.71 c0.57 c-
16. SC (FSS)3.940.790.45 c0.38 c0.32 c0.32 c0.41 c0.49 c0.52 c−0.14 a−0.20 c0.56 c0.74 c0.58 c0.75 c0.75 c0.71 c-
17. PC (FSS)3.410.970.35 c0.36 c0.24 c0.23 c0.21 c0.30 c0.33 c−0.31 c−0.17 b0.45 c0.51 c0.49 c0.41 c0.44 c0.38 c0.50 c-
18. DT (FSS)3.110.910.11 a−0.04−0.050.100.090.040.030.070.24 c0.070.17 b0.33 c0.080.27 c0.090.18 b0.17 b-
19. EA (FSS)4.020.920.29 c0.26 c0.21 c0.26 c0.35 c0.37 c0.34 c−0.05−0.070.36 c0.57 c0.43 c0.54 c0.64 c0.55 c0.57 c0.33 c0.23 c
a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01; and c p < 0.001. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; AC = self-confidence; CAN = negative coping; CAT = attentional control; CVI = visuoimaginative; NM = motivational level; CAP = positive coping; CACT = attitudinal control; AN-C = cognitive anxiety; AN-S = somatic anxiety; CONF = self-confidence; HD = ability level and challenge; AC = action and challenge; MC = clear goals; CDC = direct and clear feedback; CT = concentration on the task; SC = sense of control; PC = loss of self-consciousness; DT = distortion of the sense of time; and EA = autotelic experience.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the studied variables from the clusters.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the studied variables from the clusters.
Group 1 (n = 140)Group 2 (n = 188)
MDTMSDZ
IPED
  Self-confidence3.690.594.250.52−8.31 ***
  Negative coping3.200.563.640.57−6.36 ***
  Attentional control3.270.523.630.57−5.97 ***
  Visuoimaginative3.390.623.900.69−6.53 ***
  Motivational level3.920.594.480.43−8.37 ***
  Positive coping3.770.544.330.42−9.12 ***
  Attitudinal control3.600.534.170.46−9.20 ***
CSAI-2R
  Cognitive anxiety1.910.551.710.50−2.06 *
  Somatic anxiety3.020.592.850.70−3.33 **
  Self-confidence3.020.563.610.44−9.39 ***
FSS
  Ability and challenge3.200.564.360.52−13.39 ***
  Action and challenge3.140.603.990.71−10.12 ***
  Clear goals3.610.634.630.4012.96 ***
  Direct and clear feedback3.150.654.370.46−13.90 ***
  Concentration on the task3.520.714.580.43−12.43 ***
  Sense of control3.270.624.450.46−13.92 ***
  Loss of self-consciousness2.870.803.820.88−8.93 ***
  Distortion of time2.900.693.261.02−3.73 ***
  Autotelic experience3.350.884.530.56−11.90 ***
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; and *** p < 0.001.
Table 3. Variables in the equation of the binary logistic regression model.
Table 3. Variables in the equation of the binary logistic regression model.
BStandard ErrorWaldglSig.Exp(B)95% C.I. to Exp(B)
LowerUpper
Step 1Self-confidence. CSAI-2R2.2400.27765.52310.0009.3935.46116.156
Constant−7.2140.94058.94910.0000.001
Step 2Motivational level. IPED1.4350.28425.47110.0004.2022.4067.337
Self-confidence. CSAI-2R1.6790.29233.06710.0005.3603.0249.499
Constant−11.4091.36569.90110.0000.000
Step 3Motivational level. IPED1.0970.30712.75410.0002.9951.6405.468
Attitudinal control. IPED1.0710.3708.39910.0042.9181.4146.021
Self-confidence. CSAI-2R1.2600.32215.31310.0003.5271.8766.630
Constant−12.7621.51171.31610.0000.000
Step 4Negative coping. IPED0.5700.2834.04710.0441.7671.0153.078
Motivational level. IPED1.1440.31013.65310.0003.1401.7115.762
Attitudinal control. IPED0.8450.3864.78910.0292.3271.0924.960
Self-confidence. CSAI-2R1.1360.32712.07210.0013.1151.6415.912
Constant−13.5971.59972.31510.0000.000
Table 4. Descriptives of sports psychological profile (IPED), competitive anxiety (CSAI-2R), self-confidence (IPED/CSAI-2R) and flow state (FSS) based on age category and competitive level.
Table 4. Descriptives of sports psychological profile (IPED), competitive anxiety (CSAI-2R), self-confidence (IPED/CSAI-2R) and flow state (FSS) based on age category and competitive level.
Age CategoryCompetitive Level
14–15 Year Olds
(n = 172)		16–18 Year Olds
(n = 156)		 DH/LN/1ª
(n = 138)		2ª/3ª/4ª
(n = 190)
MSDMSDZMSDMSDZ
IPED
  Self-confidence3.920.624.110.59−2.86 **4.180.513.890.65−4.10 ***
  Negative coping3.400.633.500.58−1.643.570.563.360.62−3.17 **
  Attentional control3.440.593.520.56−1.283.510.583.450.57−1.25
  Visuoimaginative3.610.733.770.68−2.00 *3.800.663.600.74−2.36 *
  Motivational level4.270.554.200.59−1.004.330.484.170.63−1.86
  Positive coping4.070.554.120.56−0.944.210.494.010.58−3.02 **
  Attitudinal control3.860.574.000.56−2.23 *4.060.483.830.61−3.54 ***
CSAI-2R
  Cognitive anxiety3.000.662.850.65−2.09 *2.870.642.970.67−1.52
  Somatic anxiety1.810.561.780.50−0.141.680.481.880.55−3.27 **
  Self-confidence3.270.583.470.56−3.56 ***3.530.493.240.60−4.65 ***
FSS
  Ability and challenge3.720.794.010.74−3.42 **4.110.713.680.78−4.91 ***
  Action and challenge3.490.783.780.77−3.68 ***3.670.863.600.73−0.91
  Clear goals4.130.734.260.71−1.804.370.654.060.74−3.87 ***
  Direct and clear feedback3.750.823.960.80−2.43 *4.040.753.700.84−3.67 ***
  Concentration on the task4.070.804.200.73−1.394.260.734.030.78−2.81 **
  Sense of control3.820.824.080.73−2.83 **4.100.793.840.77−3.36 **
  Loss of self-consciousness3.340.953.490.98−1.493.480.923.361.00−1.08
  Distortion of time3.070.883.140.94−0.483.040.933.150.90−88
  Autotelic experience3.980.954.080.90−1.074.030.994.020.87−87
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; and *** p < 0.001. DH/LN/1ª = Division of Honor/National League/1st Andalusian; 2ª/3ª/4ª = 2nd/3rd/4th Andalusian.
Table 5. Descriptives of sports psychological profile (IPED), competitive anxiety (CSAI-2R), self-confidence (IPED/CSAI-2R) and flow state (FSS) based on the playing position on the field.
Table 5. Descriptives of sports psychological profile (IPED), competitive anxiety (CSAI-2R), self-confidence (IPED/CSAI-2R) and flow state (FSS) based on the playing position on the field.
Playing Position on the Field
Goalkeeper
(n = 31)		Defender
(n = 111)		Midfielder
(n = 89)		Forward
(n = 97)
MDTMDTMDTMDTχ2
IPED
  Self-confidence4.150.484.060.663.990.623.940.604.02
  Negative coping3.530.673.490.563.460.683.370.562.84
  Attentional control3.480.573.520.623.540.563.360.547.52
  Visuoimaginative3.730.883.710.713.610.653.710.701.82
  Motivational level4.410.574.220.574.200.604.240.554.00
  Positive coping4.120.554.120.574.130.554.020.542.90
  Attitudinal control4.020.583.960.583.930.553.870.572.63
CSAI-2R
  Cognitive anxiety2.880.662.930.632.800.693.040.652.22
  Somatic anxiety1.760.491.850.561.730.541.810.496.45
  Self-confidence3.480.503.400.593.350.603.290.564.07
FSS
  Ability and challenge3.860.933.910.783.870.733.800.791.03
  Action and challenge3.640.893.640.813.580.783.660.740.42
  Clear goals4.230.814.190.754.220.654.160.720.48
  Direct and clear feedback4.120.813.840.803.780.853.830.814.19
  Concentration on the task4.040.874.170.774.170.764.080.751.43
  Sense of control4.010.853.930.793.900.783.980.790.86
  Loss of self-consciousness3.341.083.520.923.281.023.440.942.79
  Distortion of time3.090.873.080.883.020.973.220.911.67
  Autotelic experience4.230.914.090.883.940.953.980.953.57
χ2 = Chi-square.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Domínguez-González, J.A.; Reigal, R.E.; Morales-Sánchez, V.; Hernández-Mendo, A. Analysis of the Sports Psychological Profile, Competitive Anxiety, Self-Confidence and Flow State in Young Football Players. Sports 2024, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12010020

AMA Style

Domínguez-González JA, Reigal RE, Morales-Sánchez V, Hernández-Mendo A. Analysis of the Sports Psychological Profile, Competitive Anxiety, Self-Confidence and Flow State in Young Football Players. Sports. 2024; 12(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12010020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Domínguez-González, José A., Rafael E. Reigal, Verónica Morales-Sánchez, and Antonio Hernández-Mendo. 2024. "Analysis of the Sports Psychological Profile, Competitive Anxiety, Self-Confidence and Flow State in Young Football Players" Sports 12, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12010020

APA Style

Domínguez-González, J. A., Reigal, R. E., Morales-Sánchez, V., & Hernández-Mendo, A. (2024). Analysis of the Sports Psychological Profile, Competitive Anxiety, Self-Confidence and Flow State in Young Football Players. Sports, 12(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12010020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop