Next Article in Journal
Assemblages of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Secondary Deciduous Forests of Selected Regions of the Nemoral Biome in European Russia (Spring—Early Summer Aspect)
Previous Article in Journal
Wildflower Strips Promote Spider Diversity and Biological Control Potential in a Semi-Arid Agroecosystem: Preliminary Insights from a Single Growing Season
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Temperature-Moisture Interactions on Storage Survival and Virulence in Two Entomopathogenic Nematode Species

1
Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests of Gansu Province, College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
Wuwei Shiyanghe Forestry General Farm, Wuwei 733000, China
3
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2026, 17(7), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17070723
Submission received: 12 May 2026 / Revised: 9 July 2026 / Accepted: 11 July 2026 / Published: 13 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)

Simple Summary

Chemical pesticides pose well-documented risks to environmental health and food safety, thereby creating an increasing demand for sustainable alternatives. Entomopathogenic nematodes infect and kill insect pests without harming people, animals, or the environment. However, keeping these living creatures alive and effective long enough to reach farmers remains a challenge. This study explored whether simple adjustments to the storage temperature and moisture content of the packaging material could extend their useful shelf life. Two types of beneficial entomopathogenic nematodes, both collected from Gansu Province in northwestern China, were stored in a sponge at low and room temperatures under varying moisture levels for 18 weeks. Low temperature made a dramatic difference, cutting mortality by more than 82%, while excessive moisture was highly damaging. The two nematode species responded differently: one thrived at low temperature with moderate moisture, retaining over 56% survival after 18 weeks, while the other coped better at room temperature under drier conditions. Notably, higher survival did not always translate into better pest-killing ability—suggesting that counting survivors alone is insufficient for judging product quality. These findings support the development of species-specific storage strategies and provide a scientific basis for improving the formulation and application of entomopathogenic nematodes in sustainable agriculture.

Abstract

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are among the most promising biocontrol agents; however, their short shelf life constrains commercial application. This study evaluated the effects of storage temperature (6 °C and 25 °C) and sponge substrate moisture content (42%, 48%, and 55%) on the 18-week survival and post-storage virulence of two indigenous EPN species from Gansu Province, China: Heterorhabditis megidis 0627M and Steinernema feltiae 0619HT. A Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) revealed that storage duration, temperature, moisture content, and species all significantly affected survival of H. megidis 0627M and S. feltiae 0619HT (all p < 0.001). Low-temperature storage (6 °C) reduced mortality odds by 82.4% compared with room temperature (OR = 0.176, 95% CI: 0.117–0.263, p < 0.001). High moisture content (55%) increased mortality odds by 10.1-fold relative to moderate moisture (48%; OR = 10.114, 95% CI: 6.155–16.618, p < 0.001), whereas low moisture (42%) showed no significant difference from 48% (OR = 0.942, p = 0.810). The two species exhibited distinct adaptation strategies: S. feltiae 0619HT achieved the highest survival under low-temperature storage at 48% moisture content (56.48% at week 18), whereas H. megidis 0627M demonstrated a delayed competitive advantage under room-temperature, low-moisture conditions. Virulence assays revealed that low-temperature storage better preserved infectivity under most conditions. Notably, survival and virulence were not always concordant, necessitating their evaluation as complementary metrics. Species-specific storage protocols are proposed, providing a scientific basis for the future development of regionally targeted and cost-effective native EPN formulations, as well as for regionally targeted biocontrol applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are obligate insect parasites belonging the families Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae [1]. Compared to traditional chemical pesticides, EPNs possess significant advantages, including a broad host range, strong host-seeking ability, and high efficacy against soil-dwelling and cryptic pests. They are also considered environmentally safe, with minimal impacts on non-target organisms and a low risk of resistance development [2]. In addition, infective juveniles (IJs) can be produced at relatively low cost, facilitating their application in biological control programs [3,4]. Consequently, research on EPNs and their commercialization has garnered widespread global attention [5].
Heterorhabditis megidis is widely distributed across temperate regions of Europe, North America, Japan [6,7], and Asia [8]. It predominantly parasitizes soil-dwelling Coleoptera, including the Colorado potato beetle and scarabaeid white grubs [9,10], and has also demonstrated efficacy against semi-subterranean Lepidoptera, such as Mamestra brassicae [11]. Steinernema feltiae exhibits a broader host range, infecting species within Diptera (e.g., Delia radicum) [12], Lepidoptera (e.g., Dendrolimus pini, Mamestra brassicae) [11,13,14], and Thysanoptera [15]. It is one of the most widely distributed EPN species worldwide, with confirmed native populations across Europe [15,16,17], Asia [8,18,19], and other continents, including Africa and South America [6]. Commercial formulations of both species have been predominantly developed for temperate conditions, and storage protocols tailored to indigenous strains from arid regions, such as northwestern China, remain largely uncharacterized [20,21].
Progress in EPN research has accelerated in recent years, encompassing both fundamental studies and field applications [22]. Commercial production has been achieved in several countries, with applications in turf management [23], fruit orchards [24], greenhouse vegetables [25,26], public health pests [27], rice paddies [28], suppression of soil-dwelling pests [29,30,31,32,33,34], management of boring pests [35,36], fruit tree pests [24], and wood-boring insects [37]. Despite these advances, large-scale commercialization remains limited, mainly due to difficulties in maintaining IJ viability during storage and transportation. As a non-feeding developmental stage, IJs rely entirely on endogenous energy reserves; therefore, environmental conditions that accelerate energy consumption or induce cellular damage can rapidly reduce survival [38,39]. Among abiotic factors, temperature and moisture content are widely recognized as the primary determinants of IJ survival. Elevated temperatures increase metabolic rates and energy depletion, whereas excessive desiccation disrupts membrane integrity and physiological homeostasis, ultimately resulting in mortality [40,41,42,43].
Although recent technological advances, including anhydrobiosis induction, microencapsulation, and specialized protective formulations, have successfully extended the ambient-temperature shelf life of certain commercialized EPN species [44,45,46,47], these approaches are often associated with increased production costs and limited applicability across different species. In particular, the performance of such formulations has typically been validated for a limited number of widely commercialized species—primarily Steinernema carpocapsae, S. feltiae, and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. As a result, storage optimization for regionally indigenous species remains uncharacterized [22]. Consequently, the development of cost-effective, regionally adaptable storage strategies based on simple carrier materials remains a critical and unmet need.
Currently, the predominant approach for extending EPN shelf life involves the use of carrier materials to create a moderately dehydrating environment that induces IJs into a state of quiescence or diapause [44,48]. Among available carrier materials, sponge substrates have demonstrated particular promise owing to their low cost, operational simplicity, and consistent performance [49]. However, storage efficacy is strongly influenced by the interactions among nematode species, carrier properties, and the temperature–moisture parameter space. Critically, the two factors do not act independently: the most favorable moisture level for IJs’ survival shifts with temperature, as the balance between microbial competition, desiccation stress, and metabolic suppression is temperature-dependent [50,51]. This interaction has been documented in commercialized species, yet its magnitude and directionality in indigenous strains adapted to specific climatic regimes remain poorly understood.
Beyond species selection, increasing evidence suggests that locally adapted EPN populations may possess distinct stress-tolerance profiles shaped by the selective pressures of their native environments [21,52]. Gansu Province, located in northwestern China, is characterized by low precipitation and substantial diurnal temperature fluctuations. This exerts strong selective pressure on native soil organisms. Indigenous EPN species isolated from Gansu soils may have developed physiological adaptations associated with tolerance to desiccation and thermal stress, potentially providing advantages for long-term storage under comparable environmental conditions [8]. Nevertheless, systematic evaluations of these indigenous species under simulated practical storage and transportation conditions remain limited. Determining the optimal combination of temperature and moisture content that synergistically maintains long-term survival and infectivity is therefore essential for translating these local EPN resources into practical biocontrol applications.
To establish a practical storage strategy for indigenous EPN resources from Gansu Province, this study selected two representative locally isolated strains, H. megidis 0627M and S. feltiae 0619HT, as experimental subjects. The effects of different storage temperatures and moisture-content gradients on the long-term survival and virulence of these EPNs were systematically evaluated using sponge substrates under simulated practical storage conditions. This study aimed to quantify survival dynamics over an 18-week storage period and evaluate post-storage virulence against Galleria mellonella, with particular emphasis on determining the relationship between survival and virulence responses across different treatments. The findings provide a scientific basis and technical support for the commercial formulation, storage, and transportation of indigenous EPN products, thereby facilitating their practical application in sustainable regional green agriculture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

Test Insects: Fifth-instar larvae of G. mellonella were obtained from a commercial supplier. Upon arrival, only actively moving, uniformly sized fifth-instar larvae (weighing approximately 200–250 mg) with no visible signs of melanization or disease were selected for experiments to ensure consistent host susceptibility and minimize experimental variation.
Entomopathogenic Nematode Species: H. megidis 0627M (originally isolated from Tianshui, Gansu Province) and S. feltiae 0619HT (originally isolated from Baiyin, Gansu Province) were provided by the Ecology Laboratory of Gansu Agricultural University [8]. Both species had been maintained through periodic in vivo propagation in G. mellonella. Before experiments, IJs were propagated using the White-Trap method (see Section 2.2.1), and only freshly emerged IJs (≤5 days post-emergence) with >95% motility (assessed by microscopic observation) were used for storage trials. The initial IJs concentration of storage suspensions was standardized to 2 × 103 IJs/mL, and all storage experiments were initiated within 24 h of IJs harvest to minimize pre-experimental aging effects.
Main Experimental Materials: The polyurethane sponge blocks were uniformly cut into small cubic pieces with a volume of approximately 0.5 cm3 (density: 8.25 × 10−3 g/cm3), Petri dishes (9 cm diameter), sterilized filter paper (9 cm diameter), 50 mL screw-cap centrifuge tubes, and pipette tips. All materials were sterilized at 121 °C for 30 min before use.
Major Instruments: A stereoscopic microscope (Stemi 305 LAB, Carl Zeiss Suzhou Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China), precision electronic balance (Model: BCE224-1CCN, Sartorius Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Goettingen, Germany), autoclave (Model: GI54DWS, Zhiwei Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), constant temperature incubator (QRGN-880-3, Hangzhou Qisheng Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China), and pipettes with capacities of 1000 μL, 10 μL, and 1 μL (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany).

2.2. Experimental Methods

2.2.1. Cultivation and Propagation of EPNs

All EPNs were propagated using the White-Trap method [53] (Figure 1). The culturing process was conducted under the following conditions: a 9 cm sterile Petri dish was lined with two layers of 9 cm diameter sterilized filter paper. Ten healthy last-instar Galleria mellonella larvae were placed into the Petri dish. Using a pipette, 800 IJs of H. megidis 0627M and S. feltiae 0619HT were applied onto the larvae. A sufficient amount of distilled water was added to keep the filter paper moist without dripping [54]. The dish was then placed in a 25 °C constant-temperature incubator in darkness. Infected larvae typically exhibited mortality within 48–72 h post-inoculation. Cadavers were transferred to modified White traps (a 9 cm Petri dish containing a smaller inverted 6 cm dish lined with moistened filter paper, onto which cadavers were placed) within 24 h of death. Traps were maintained at 25 °C in darkness, and emerging IJs were collected daily from the water reservoir for 7–10 days [55].

2.2.2. Survival Assessment During Storage

Experimental design and moisture gradient preparation. The selection of moisture gradients was informed by preliminary storage trials and previously published studies on solid-carrier EPN formulations, which collectively indicate that absorbent substrates—such as vermiculite, sponge, and clay granules—create microenvironments requiring a carrier moisture content within a specific range (typically 40–60%) to maintain adequate air circulation and water balance within the pore space [56]. Moisture content below 40% VMC risks inducing excessive desiccation stress in IJs, whereas moisture content above 60% VMC may promote microbial proliferation and increase nematode mortality during storage [50]. Accordingly, three intermediate VMC levels—42%, 48%, and 55%—were selected to represent low, moderate, and relatively high moisture conditions within the practically relevant range for sponge-based storage systems. This design enabled assessment of nematode responses across a biologically meaningful moisture gradient while avoiding the detrimental effects of extreme conditions on long-term storability. Three volumetric moisture gradients were established using 50 mL screw-capped polypropylene centrifuge tubes. Sponge blocks of 0.25 g, 0.20 g, or 0.15 g were placed into individual tubes, and 22 mL of freshly harvested nematode suspension (concentration: 2 × 103 IJs/mL) was added to each tube using a sterile pipette. Tubes were gently agitated for 60 s to ensure complete absorption of the suspension by the sponge matrix and uniform distribution of IJs. Volumetric moisture content (VMC) was calculated as:
V M C ( % ) = V n e m a t o d e   s o l u t i o n V s p o n g e + V n e m a t o d e   s o l u t i o n × 100
where V nematode solution is the volume of nematode suspension (22 mL), and V sponge is the total volume of dry sponge, calculated as m sponge/ρ sponge (m sponge: total sponge mass; ρ sponge: 8.25 × 10−3 g/cm3). This yielded VMC values of approximately 42%, 48%, and 55% for the 0.25 g, 0.20 g, and 0.15 g sponge treatments, respectively. Volumetric moisture content was selected as the metric because it directly represents the proportion of water-filled pore space in the sponge matrix.
After sealing, tubes were stored in complete darkness under two temperature conditions: room temperature (25 ± 1 °C, designated RT) and low temperature (6 ± 1 °C, designated LT), maintained in constant-temperature incubators. The full experimental design comprised 2 temperatures × 3 moisture levels × 2 nematode species, yielding 12 treatment combinations. Three independent tubes were prepared for each treatment combination at each sampling time point. To prevent cross-contamination between species, all tubes were handled with dedicated sterile forceps and processed in a fixed order for each species at each time point.
Survival assessments were conducted at weekly intervals from week 0 (24 h post-setup) through week 18, yielding 19 time points per treatment. At each sampling time point, one sponge block (approximately 0.5 cm3) was removed from each tube using sterile forceps. Each sponge block represented a subsample of the corresponding tube rather than an independent replicate. The block was transferred to a small Petri dish containing 5 mL sterile distilled water and gently agitated for 60 s to release IJs into suspension. The resulting suspension was examined under a stereoscopic microscope at 40 × magnification. IJs exhibiting active movement and a response to mechanical stimulation were considered alive, whereas IJs showing no movement or response to stimulation were considered dead. A minimum of 100 IJs per sample was counted whenever possible. In cases where fewer individuals were recovered, all available IJs were counted. Survival was expressed as a proportion, thereby standardizing comparisons across samples despite variation in recovery numbers. No additional water was supplemented throughout the experimental period. Survival rate was calculated as:
S u r v i v a l   r a t e % = N u m b e r   o f   l i v e   I J s T o t a l   I J s   c o u n t e d × 100
A summary of the full experimental design, including the number of tubes per treatment combination, sponge blocks sampled per time point, and IJs counted per sample, is provided in Supplementary Table S1.

2.2.3. Determination of Virulence of EPNs at Different Storage Conditions

Virulence of EPNs was assessed using last-instar larvae of G. mellonella. Two layers of sterilized filter paper (9 cm diameter) were placed in each Petri dish, and six healthy larvae were introduced per dish. For each treatment, the volume of the nematode suspension was adjusted according to the post-storage survival rate of recovered IJs to ensure that 300 viable, motile IJs were inoculated per dish. To evaluate the effect of storage, virulence assays were conducted for both freshly harvested IJs (≤5 days post-emergence; week 0 control) and IJs stored for 18 weeks under the experimental temperature and moisture conditions described above. Three biological replicates were established for each treatment group. All dishes were incubated at 25 °C in darkness. Larval mortality was recorded at 8 h intervals over 120 h. Death was confirmed by the absence of movement and lack of response to mechanical stimulation. Virulence was calculated as:
V i r u l e n c e = N u m b e r   o f   d e a d   G .   m e l l o n e l l a   I n i t i a l   n u m b e r   o f   G .   m e l l o n e l l a × 100 %
To quantify the retention of infectivity after storage, a virulence retention index (VRI) was calculated as:
V R I = V i r u l e n c e   a t   w e e k   18 V i r u l e n c e   a t   w e e k   0 × 100 %

2.2.4. Data Statistical Analysis

All data were processed using Microsoft Excel, and figures were generated using OriginPro 2022 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The experimental unit was defined as the individual storage tube, with three tubes per treatment combination serving as independent biological replicates. To systematically assess how storage conditions influenced survival dynamics, a Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with binomial distribution and logit link function was employed, with the proportion of dead IJs (DeadCount/TotalCount) as the response variable. The model was specified as:
logit ( p i j ) = β 0 + β 1 Time + β 2 Temperature + β 3 M o i s t u r e + β 4 S p e c i e s + β 5 ( T i m e × T e m p e r a t u r e ) + β 6 ( T i m e × M o i s t u r e ) + β 7 ( T i m e × S p e c i e s ) + β 8 ( T e m p e r a t u r e × M o i s t u r e ) + β 9 ( T e m p e r a t u r e × S p e c i e s ) + β 10 ( M o i s t u r e × S p e c i e s ) + h i g h e r o r d e r   i n t e r a c t i o n s + u i
where pij is the probability of mortality (DeadCount/TotalCount) for tube i at time point j, β represents fixed-effect coefficients for storage duration (Time), temperature (Temperature), moisture content (Moisture), nematode species (Species), and all two-way, three-way, and four-way interaction terms among these factors. ui ~ N(0, σ2) is the random intercept for Subject ID (tube identity), included to account for the within-tube correlation arising from repeated sampling across 19 weekly time points. No random slope was specified, as the primary interest was in population-level fixed effects. Significance of fixed effects was assessed using Type III F-tests with Satterthwaite approximation for denominator degrees of freedom. Model assumptions were verified by residual diagnostics. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were derived from GLMM fixed-effect parameter estimates to quantify the magnitude and direction of each factor’s effect on nematode survival probability. Three-way factorial ANOVA, with nematode species, storage temperature, and moisture content as fixed factors, analyzed virulence data. When significant effects were detected, Tukey’s HSD test was used for post hoc comparisons to control the family-wise error rate. Simple effects analyses were conducted to further examine significant interactions.

3. Results

3.1. Comprehensive Effects of Storage Conditions on Survival Rate

GLMM analysis revealed that all main effects significantly influenced nematode survival (p < 0.001) (Table 1). Among these factors, temperature exerted the greatest influence on survival (F(1, 661) = 71.139), followed by moisture content (F(2, 661) = 56.624), species (F(1, 661) = 29.360), and storage duration (F(18, 661) = 8.683). These results indicate that temperature had the greatest statistical effect on survival, whereas storage duration showed a comparatively smaller effect than the other examined factors.
Among the two-way interactions, none of the interactions involving storage duration were significant, including temperature × storage duration (F(18, 584) = 0.833, p = 0.662), moisture content × storage duration (F(36, 584) = 0.204, p = 1.000), and species × storage duration (F(18, 584) = 0.540, p = 0.939). In contrast, interactions not involving storage duration were all highly significant: temperature × moisture content (F(2, 584) = 100.883, p < 0.001), species × temperature (F(1, 584) = 38.005, p < 0.001), and species × moisture content (F(2, 584) = 44.733, p < 0.001). These results indicate that although storage duration significantly affected overall survival, its interactions with other factors did not significantly modify the pattern of survival changes over time. Instead, the significant interaction effects among temperature, moisture content, and species identity represented the dominant factors influencing survival responses.
Among the three-way interactions, temperature × moisture content × storage duration was highly significant (F(36, 492) = 2.143, p < 0.001), and species × moisture content × storage duration also showed a significant effect (F(36, 492) = 1.538, p = 0.026). In contrast, species × temperature × storage duration (F(18, 492) = 1.534, p = 0.074) and species × temperature × moisture content (F(2, 492) = 0.019, p = 0.981) were not significant, indicating that species-specific differences in survival changes over time were more strongly associated with moisture conditions than with temperature effects alone.
The four-way interaction of species × temperature × moisture content × storage duration was highly significant (F(227, 456) = 17.923, p < 0.001). This result indicates that the temporal patterns of nematode survival depended on the combined effects of species identity, temperature, and moisture conditions, with clear species-specific differences in survival responses under different storage regimes.
Collectively, these results demonstrate that nematode storage survival is shaped by multiple interacting factors, with storage duration, moisture content, temperature, and species identity jointly influencing both the overall level of survival and its temporal trajectory. The specific manifestations of these interactions in the survival dynamics of the two nematode species are elaborated in detail in the following sections.

3.2. Dynamic Changes in Survival Under the Interacting Effects of Temperature, Moisture Content, and Species

Given that storage duration significantly affected survival (Section 3.1), the following analyses examine how temperature, moisture content, and nematode species influenced survival patterns over time.

3.2.1. Temperature Strongly Influences Long-Term Survival

Among the environmental factors tested, temperature strongly influenced the temporal trajectory of survival decline. Across the 18-week storage period, low-temperature storage (6 °C) consistently delayed the decline in survival for both entomopathogenic nematode species across all moisture content levels (Figure 2). This temperature effect became particularly evident after approximately four weeks of storage and persisted until the end of the experiment. In contrast, survival under room temperature (25 °C) declined more rapidly, indicating that temperature conditions significantly affected the temporal dynamics of nematode viability during storage.

3.2.2. Species-Specific Responses Under Low-Temperature Storage

Steinernema feltiae 0619HT exhibited higher tolerance to low-temperature storage. Under low-temperature conditions, its survival rate was consistently higher than that of H. megidis 0627M across most moisture content treatments (Figure 2B). Notably, at 48% moisture content—the moisture level associated with the highest survival within the tested range—its survival rate remained above 50% after 18 weeks of storage, showing significantly higher survival than the other tested conditions (Figure 2). In contrast, under room-temperature storage at 25 °C, the survival rate of S. feltiae 0619HT declined rapidly across all moisture content levels, indicating poor survival performance under prolonged room-temperature storage conditions.

3.2.3. Delayed Survival Advantage of H. megidis 0627M Under Room-Temperature Storage

In contrast to the S. feltiae 0619HT, H. megidis 0627M exhibited a distinct temporal response pattern under room-temperature storage. At 25 °C, it showed improved survival performance under lower moisture conditions over prolonged storage. At 42% moisture content, its survival rate significantly surpassed that of S. feltiae 0619HT starting from week 8 (week 8: H. megidis 0627M 88.32% vs. S. feltiae 0619HT 80.11%; F(37, 76) = 5.07, p < 0.01). At 48% moisture content, despite a lower initial survival rate, its survival rate reached 43.16% at approximately week 16, significantly exceeding that of S. feltiae (40.74%) and maintaining this advantage until the end of the experiment (F(37, 76) = 54.28, p < 0.05) (Figure 2A). This time-dependent shift in survival performance highlights interspecific differences in tolerance to prolonged combined thermal and moisture stress between the two nematode species.

3.2.4. Temperature-Dependent Effects of Moisture Content on Survival

Over the 18-week storage period, survival patterns differed significantly among temperature–moisture combinations. Low-temperature storage resulted in higher survival under the tested moisture conditions. Steinernema feltiae 0619HT achieved the highest survival at the end of the storage period under 6 °C and 48% moisture content, with 56.48% survival at week 18. The next best-performing treatments were S. feltiae 0619HT (52.79% survival) and H. megidis 0627M (47.85% survival), both under 6 °C and 42% moisture content, indicating that the combination of low temperature and moderate-to-low moisture content was associated with improved long-term survival of EPNs.
Under room-temperature conditions (25 °C), survival rates of both species declined progressively with increasing moisture content. The lowest moisture level (42%) resulted in the highest survival rates, whereas the highest mortality was recorded at 55% moisture content. Notably, S. feltiae 0619HT at 25 °C and 55% moisture content exhibited near-complete mortality by week 18 (survival rate < 3%), while H. megidis 0627M showed complete mortality from the beginning of storage. These results indicate that high moisture conditions at elevated temperature were associated with substantially reduced long-term survival of both nematode species.
Importantly, all low-temperature treatment groups exhibited consistently higher survival rates than their corresponding room-temperature counterparts at equivalent moisture content levels. These results indicated that temperature was the strongest influencing factor affecting long-term nematode survival, while moisture content represented an additional important factor influencing storage performance (Figure 2).

3.2.5. Integrated Assessment of Storage Performance

To visualize how different storage conditions affected long-term storage performance, a heatmap analysis was employed to display the species-specific temporal dynamics under various temperature and moisture content combinations (Figure 3).
Under low-temperature storage (6 °C) at 55% moisture content, S. feltiae 0619HT consistently maintained higher survival rates than H. megidis 0627M throughout most of the storage period. With the exception of weeks 0–3, week 9, and weeks 12–15, where no significant differences were detected (p > 0.05), and weeks 4 and 17, where moderately significant differences were observed (p < 0.05), interspecific differences were highly significant at the majority of time points (p < 0.01, F(37, 76) = 1.79). At 48% moisture content, S. feltiae 0619HT exhibited higher survival than H. megidis 0627M at most time points. Interspecific differences were non-significant at weeks 0–1, 4, and 16 (p > 0.05), significant at weeks 2, 3, 5, 11, and 17 (p < 0.05), and highly significant at all remaining time points (p < 0.01, F(37, 76) = 7.12). At 42% moisture content, no significant interspecific differences were detected at any time point (p > 0.05), indicating similar survival performance between the two species under low-moisture, low-temperature storage conditions.
Under room-temperature storage (25 °C) at 48% moisture content, a time-dependent shift in survival performance was observed between the two species. Steinernema feltiae 0619HT exhibited higher survival during the early storage period (weeks 0–15), after which H. megidis 0627M gradually gained the advantage. By week 16, the survival rate of H. megidis 0627M significantly exceeded that of S. feltiae 0619HT (43.16% vs. 40.74%; p < 0.01). Apart from weeks 0, 1, 11, and 12, where differences were non-significant (p > 0.05), and week 2, where differences were significant (p < 0.05), interspecific differences were highly significant at the majority of time points (p < 0.01, F(37, 76) = 54.28). At 42% moisture content, H. megidis 0627M showed higher survival than S. feltiae 0619HT with increasing storage duration. Except for weeks 0–7, 10–14, and 16, where survival rates were comparable (p > 0.05), differences were highly significant at most time points (p < 0.01, F(37, 76) = 5.07). At 55% moisture content, both species exhibited rapid mortality, with H. megidis 0627M showing complete mortality from the beginning of storage, whereas the survival rate of S. feltiae 0619HT declined to 2.58% by week 18.
After 18 weeks of storage, the most favorable conditions within the tested range differed markedly between the two temperature regimes (Figure 3). Under room temperature (25 °C), survival rates of both species declined with increasing moisture content, with 42% moisture content being associated with the highest survival rates and highly significant interspecific differences (S. feltiae 0619HT: 13.62%; H. megidis 0627M: 24.84%; p < 0.01). Both species showed severe survival decline under 55% moisture content at room temperature. Under low temperature (6 °C), survival reached the highest level within the tested moisture range at 48% moisture content, with highly significant interspecific differences (S. feltiae 0619HT: 56.48%; H. megidis 0627M: 50.37%; p < 0.01), while the lowest survival was recorded at 55% moisture content, also with highly significant differences (S. feltiae 0619HT: 50.61%; H. megidis 0627M: 43.39%; p < 0.01).
Collectively, these results indicate that storage conditions associated with higher survival differed between species and depended on the interactions among temperature, moisture content, and storage duration. Steinernema feltiae 0619HT showed the highest survival under low-temperature and moderate-moisture conditions, whereas H. megidis 0627M maintained higher survival under prolonged room-temperature storage with low moisture content.

3.3. Quantitative Assessment of Mortality Risk Using Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM)

To quantify the relative contribution of storage parameters to nematode mortality risk, a GLMM was constructed using species, temperature, and moisture content as explanatory variables (Table 2). Temperature was identified as the strongest influencing factor affecting mortality risk. Storage at 6 °C significantly reduced the odds of death by 82.4% compared with room-temperature storage (25 °C; odds ratio [OR] = 0.176, 95% CI: 0.117–0.263, p < 0.001), highlighting the critical role of low temperature in maintaining nematode survival during storage. Moisture content also exerted a significant influence on survival risk. Using 48% moisture content as the reference level, high moisture content (55%) increased the odds of mortality by more than 9-fold (OR = 10.114, 95% CI: 6.155–16.618, p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference in hazard was detected between 42% and 48% moisture content (p = 0.810). These results indicate that excessive moisture was associated with increased mortality risk during storage, whereas moderate reductions in moisture content did not substantially affect survival. Species identity had a significant but comparatively smaller effect on mortality risk. Across all storage conditions, S. feltiae 0619HT exhibited an approximately 67.2% lower overall odds of death than H. megidis 0627M (OR = 0.328, 95% CI: 0.219–0.490, p < 0.001), indicating a higher survival probability of this species under the tested storage conditions. Collectively, the GLMM revealed a relative importance pattern among storage-related factors, with low temperature (6 °C) providing the strongest protective effect, followed by the intrinsic tolerance of the S. feltiae strain, while excessive moisture (55%) acts as the most critical risk factor.

3.4. Effects of Storage Conditions on Nematode Virulence After Long-Term Storage

After 18 weeks of storage, virulence assays showed that storage conditions affected not only nematode survival rates but also the infective capacity of surviving IJs (Figure 4; Table 3).
Interspecific differences in virulence across moisture levels
At 55% moisture content, S. feltiae 0619HT exhibited significantly higher virulence than H. megidis 0627M under both room-temperature (F(5, 12) = 128.53, p < 0.01) and low-temperature (F(5, 12) = 12.52, p < 0.01) storage conditions. Furthermore, both species showed significantly higher virulence after low-temperature storage than after room-temperature storage (H. megidis 0627M: F(5, 12) = 114.73, p < 0.01; S. feltiae 0619HT: F(5, 12) = 13.62, p < 0.01).
At 48% moisture content, interspecific differences in virulence varied between temperature regimes. Under room-temperature storage, the virulence of H. megidis 0627M was significantly higher than that of S. feltiae 0619HT (F(5, 12) = 128.53, p < 0.01), whereas no significant interspecific difference was detected after low-temperature storage (p > 0.05). Species-specific responses to storage temperature were observed in the intraspecific comparisons: the virulence of H. megidis 0627M was not significantly affected by storage temperature (p > 0.05), whereas that of S. feltiae 0619HT was significantly higher after low-temperature storage than after room-temperature storage (F(5, 12) = 13.62, p < 0.01).
At 42% moisture content, no significant interspecific differences in virulence were detected under either temperature regime (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, low-temperature storage resulted in significantly higher retained virulence in both species compared with room-temperature storage (H. megidis 0627M: F(5, 12) = 114.73, p < 0.01; S. feltiae 0619HT: F(5, 12) = 13.62, p < 0.01).
Intraspecific effects of moisture content on virulence
For H. megidis 0627M under room-temperature storage, virulence varied significantly among moisture levels (F(2, 6) = 1720.06, p < 0.01), with the highest virulence recorded at 48% moisture content and the lowest at 55%. Under low-temperature storage, no significant difference in virulence was detected between 42% and 48% moisture content (p > 0.05); however, both levels resulted in significantly higher virulence than 55% moisture content. For S. feltiae 0619HT, virulence at 42% and 48% moisture content did not differ significantly under either room-temperature or low-temperature storage (p > 0.05), whereas both moisture levels maintained significantly higher virulence than at 55% moisture content.
Collectively, with the exception of room-temperature storage at 48% moisture content—where H. megidis 0627M exhibited significantly higher virulence than S. feltiae 0619HT and was unaffected by storage temperature—S. feltiae 0619HT showed higher virulence in most other treatment combinations. Notably, low-temperature storage resulted in better retention of virulence in both species under most moisture content conditions, indicating that cold storage not only improves survival retention but also more effectively preserves nematode infective after long-term storage.
Relationship between endpoint survival rate and virulence
The analysis indicated that at the storage endpoint (week 18), survival rate and virulence were not consistently concordant across treatment combinations, indicating a descriptive relationship rather than a statistically validated correlation. For example, under low-temperature storage at 48% moisture content and room-temperature storage at 42% moisture content, no significant interspecific differences in virulence were detected despite highly significant differences in survival rate at week 18 (p < 0.01) (Figure 3). At 42% moisture content under low temperature, both survival rates (52.79% vs. 47.85%) and virulence were comparable between the two species (Figure 3). Conversely, at 55% moisture content under low temperature, the significantly higher survival rate of S. feltiae 0619HT (50.61%) relative to H. megidis 0627M (43.39%) was accompanied by significantly greater virulence. Similarly, under room-temperature storage at 48% moisture content, the higher survival rate of H. megidis 0627M (15.74%) compared with S. feltiae 0619HT (8.97%) was associated with significantly higher virulence. These results suggest that survival and virulence are distinct and complementary metrics, and both should be evaluated when optimizing long-term storage conditions to ensure not only nematode viability but also functional infectivity.

4. Discussion

This study systematically evaluated the long-term storage potential of two indigenous EPNs from Gansu Province, China—H. megidis 0627M and S. feltiae 0619HT—under different storage temperatures and substrate moisture conditions. The results demonstrated that in sponge carriers, both survival rate and post-storage virulence were strongly shaped by the interaction between temperature and moisture content, with different species exhibiting distinct storage response patterns. Low-temperature storage markedly reduced mortality risk and more effectively preserved post-storage infectivity across most conditions, whereas the most favorable moisture levels within the tested range varied depending on both temperature and nematode species. Survival rate and virulence did not consistently co-vary across storage conditions.
Our findings demonstrate that low temperature (6 °C) significantly prolonged the survival of both nematode species, consistent with the well-established principle that low temperatures can reduce metabolic activity and help conserve energy reserves in EPNs [49,57,58,59]. Steinernema feltiae 0619HT maintained a survival rate of 56.48% after 18 weeks of storage at 6 °C and 48% moisture content in polyurethane sponge—a result broadly comparable to the approximately 55% survival reported by Touray et al. [49] for an S. feltiae strain after 8 months at 10 °C in Scotchbrite sponge. Under low-temperature conditions, S. feltiae 0619HT consistently maintained higher survival rates than H. megidis 0627M, indicating greater tolerance of this species to cold storage conditions. This disparity may be attributable to interspecific differences in energy reserve composition and physiological traits associated with cold tolerance. Previous studies have reported that Steinernema possesses relatively high lipid reserves; compounds such as glycerol may serve not only as energy sources during prolonged quiescence but also as membrane stabilizers and cryoprotectants under low-temperature conditions [60]. Furthermore, cold exposure has been shown to rapidly induce the accumulation of protective carbohydrates such as trehalose in this species [61], as well as upregulate the expression of stress-resistance proteins, including heat shock proteins (HSPs) and late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins [62]. These coordinated molecular responses may contribute to the maintenance of cellular structural integrity and improved survival under refrigerated storage conditions.
In contrast, H. megidis 0627M showed a delayed storage advantage under room-temperature storage with low moisture content. Specifically, at 25 °C, this species outperformed S. feltiae 0619HT from week 8 onward at 42% moisture content, and from week 16 onward at 48% moisture content. This finding differs from the general pattern that Heterorhabditis spp. are less tolerant than Steinernema spp. under ambient-temperature storage conditions [21]. We propose that this strain-specific response may be associated with local environmental adaptation and differential stress tolerance traits; under prolonged moisture stress at room temperature, H. megidis 0627M may gradually activate protective responses, including the accumulation of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, trehalose, and glycerol. It has been reported that these protective compounds can be induced in response to chronic rather than acute desiccation stress [63,64]. The time-dependent nature of this competitive reversal is consistent with this hypothesis: a stress-response process requiring progressive induction would be expected to confer advantage only after sufficient storage duration, rather than from the outset. However, this mechanistic explanation remains speculative. Future studies should quantify trehalose accumulation kinetics and LEA protein expression levels across storage time points to directly test this hypothesis.
Significant interspecific differences in stress tolerance exist among EPNs [38], and temperature and moisture content are known to exert closely coupled interactive effects on nematode survival [51]. Our study revealed that although survival rates of both EPN species increased with decreasing moisture content, the most favorable moisture level within the tested range exhibited a marked temperature dependence. After 18 weeks of storage, 48% moisture content provided the most favorable survival conditions for both species under low-temperature storage. This specific combination may have balanced water availability and desiccation stress, thereby helping maintain energy reserves in both species—particularly S. feltiae 0619HT—under a low-metabolic state. Conversely, under room-temperature conditions, 42% moisture content proved most favorable within the tested range. The reduced moisture level imposed greater desiccation pressure, forcing nematodes into a deeper state of quiescence and substantially decelerating the rate of energy depletion [50], which conferred a pronounced survival advantage to the drought-adapted strain H. megidis 0627M.
Notably, H. megidis 0627M underwent complete mortality within 24 h under room-temperature storage with 55% moisture content, a result that was consistent across all three biological replicate tubes (n = 3), accompanied by a distinctive odor upon tube opening. The mechanism underlying such rapid and complete mortality under warm, high-humidity conditions remains to be elucidated. A plausible explanation is rapid microbial proliferation within the sponge matrix: at 25 °C and 55% moisture, the environment simultaneously favors microbial growth and increases the metabolic demands of nematodes. Under these conditions, the balance between IJs’ energy reserves and microbial stress may rapidly shift toward mortality, particularly in Heterorhabditis spp., which possess a relatively narrow thermal niche and are better adapted to cooler environments [64]. Upon opening these storage tubes, we noticed a distinctive odor consistent with microbial decomposition of nematode biomass. Although this observation has not been experimentally confirmed, the odor may involve volatile amine compounds such as cadaverine and putrescine, which are known to function as necromone signals in some nematode systems [65,66]. Direct future investigations—including microbiome profiling and quantitative analysis of volatile organic compounds—are required to determine the specific mechanisms.
Survival rate and virulence are not equivalent parameters; storage conditions affect not only the quantity of viable IJs but also their functional quality [49,67]. Following 18 weeks of room-temperature storage, even surviving IJs exhibited diminished host-seeking and infectivity capabilities, a consequence of nematode aging during prolonged storage [68]. Our results demonstrate that low temperature effectively maintained virulence under the majority of conditions tested, consistent with previous findings [57,59]. The underlying protective mechanism may involve reduced oxidative metabolism and decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation under low-temperature conditions, thereby mitigating degenerative damage to virulence-associated molecular systems. Under most low-temperature conditions, S. feltiae 0619HT exhibited significantly higher virulence than H. megidis 0627M, which may reflect species-specific cold-tolerance traits associated with Steinernema, including its interactions with symbiotic bacteria (Xenorhabdus spp.) and chemotaxis mechanisms, consistent with previously documented cold-tolerance traits of this genus [60,61,62,69]. In contrast, storage temperature had no significant effect on the virulence of H. megidis 0627M at room temperature and 48% moisture content; moreover, under these specific conditions, its virulence was significantly higher than that of S. feltiae 0619HT. This finding suggests that prolonged storage does not inevitably compromise nematode virulence when conditions are appropriately matched to species physiology [46], and that different species may possess species-specific optima for virulence retention [70,71]. For H. megidis 0627M, these conditions may more closely resemble its native environmental conditions, enabling a favorable balance between energy expenditure and the maintenance of infective capacity. The VRI summarized in Table 3 further quantitatively supports this conclusion, demonstrating a consistent pattern across the tested storage regimes. Collectively, these observations suggest that survival rate alone may not be a sufficient indicator of storage quality under all conditions, and that virulence should be evaluated as a complementary metric alongside survival—particularly in treatment combinations where IJs remain viable but may experience functional deterioration.
In long-term storage systems for EPNs, the selection of storage substrate is a critical factor because the carrier directly influences EPN survival and biological activity [63,72]. In the present study, sponge was employed as a storage carrier and demonstrated practical advantages in terms of handling convenience, availability, and the maintenance of nematode viability under appropriate moisture and temperature conditions, consistent with findings reported by Touray et al. [49] using comparable absorbent substrates. However, nematode retention within the sponge matrix may result in reduced recovery efficiency during field application [73]; future formulation improvements could incorporate desiccation protectants or composite moisture-retaining materials to enhance storage efficiency [74,75]. At the species selection level, although abiotic factors undoubtedly shape EPN storage performance and field efficacy [20], the selection of indigenous species with strong tolerance to local climatic conditions remains a fundamental prerequisite for improving formulation stability and biocontrol effectiveness. The efficacy of indigenous EPNs generally exhibits region-specific variation [21], a pattern consistently validated across multiple countries and regions [8,35,52,76]. The H. megidis 0627M and S. feltiae 0619HT used in this study were isolated from Tianshui City and Baiyin City in Gansu Province, respectively, and have been demonstrated to possess strong adaptability to their local environments [8], providing a valuable resource basis for their further development as regional biological control products.
While this study systematically evaluated the effects of temperature and moisture content on the storage performance of two indigenous EPN species, several limitations warrant acknowledgment. First, adequate ventilation is a critical factor influencing the long-term survival of EPNs under room-temperature storage [77]. As containers were necessarily opened weekly for sampling, the experimental conditions did not fully represent a commercially sealed packaging environment; whether EPNs can maintain viability for 18 weeks or longer under completely sealed conditions, therefore, remains to be verified. Relatedly, repeated opening of the same tube throughout the storage period may have introduced minor cumulative perturbations to the tube microenvironment, including potential changes in oxygen levels, moisture distribution, and microbial dynamics. Although within-tube correlation was statistically accounted for by including Subject ID as a random intercept in the GLMM, the potential effects of repeated tube opening on nematode survival cannot be completely excluded. It should also be noted that the moisture-related conclusions of this study are bounded by the specific range tested (42–55% VMC) and should not be interpreted as representing a global optimum across the full theoretical range of substrate moisture content; further investigation across a broader moisture gradient would be required to determine whether more favorable conditions exist outside this range. Similarly, no non-sponge control (e.g., aqueous suspension storage) was included in the present design; the findings should therefore be interpreted as characterizing the optimization of storage conditions within the sponge-based system itself, consistent with the cost-effectiveness and operational simplicity that motivated its selection as a carrier material in this study [49]. Direct comparison with alternative carrier materials, while beyond the scope of the present study, represents a valuable direction for future research. Second, key stress-resistance physiological indicators—such as trehalose accumulation and heat shock protein expression—were not dynamically monitored throughout the storage period, precluding mechanistic elucidation of the observed survival differences at the molecular level. Third, virulence was assessed exclusively at week 18; therefore, the temporal dynamics of virulence changes throughout the storage period remain uncharacterized. Furthermore, the present study examined only two species and three moisture content levels, and the generalizability of these conclusions requires validation through broader multi-species comparisons and more refined parameter optimization. Future research should integrate physiological, biochemical, and omics-based approaches to further elucidate the energy metabolism and stress response mechanisms of EPNs during prolonged storage, and to explore optimized storage strategies under fully sealed conditions or multi-factor synergistic regimes, such as oxygen regulation and composite moisture-retention systems.
In summary, this study demonstrated the advantage of low-temperature storage for S. feltiae 0619HT and characterized the delayed storage superiority of H. megidis 0627M under room-temperature and low-moisture conditions. Through moisture content regulation in sponge carriers, species-specific storage strategies were developed for both indigenous EPN species, providing quantifiable laboratory parameters to support the future optimization and transportation of commercial EPN formulations. Notably, S. feltiae 0619HT achieved 56.48% survival after 18 weeks at 6 °C, broadly consistent with survival rates reported for S. feltiae stored in sponge substrates under comparable refrigerated conditions [49], while H. megidis 0627M demonstrated a distinct virulence advantage under room-temperature storage at 48% moisture content—conditions that may better reflect the environmental characteristics of arid northwestern China. These results suggest that locally adapted indigenous strains can achieve comparable performance to reference strains under cold-chain conditions while providing complementary advantages under ambient low-moisture storage, highlighting their potential for the development of regionally targeted and cost-effective biocontrol formulations. These findings indicate that the implementation of differentiated, species-specific storage strategies represents an important approach for maintaining both nematode viability and virulence, thereby improving the storage stability of EPN-based biocontrol products. Looking ahead, further enhancement of EPN tolerance to complex environments—such as arid and semi-arid regions—should be pursued through the integration of optimized carrier formulations, species genetic improvement, and innovations in formulation technology, collectively advancing the large-scale application of EPNs in regionally sustainable green agriculture.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects17070723/s1, Table S1: Summary of the full experimental design.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L.; formal analysis, H.L.; software, H.L.; validation, H.L. and X.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, K.Z., X.Q. and T.Z.; supervision, X.Q.; resources, X.Q.; funding acquisition, X.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Xizang Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project (No. XZ202301ZY0019N), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31960559), and the earmarked fund for Gansu Agriculture Research System (GSARS-03-06).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all those who helped me during the trial and in the writing process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tarasco, E.; Fanelli, E.; Salvemini, C.; El-Khoury, Y.; Troccoli, A.; Vovlas, A.; De Luca, F. Entomopathogenic Nematodes and Their Symbiotic Bacteria: From Genes to Field Uses. Front. Insect Sci. 2023, 3, 1195254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Demarta, L.; Hibbard, B.E.; Bohn, M.O.; Hiltpold, I. The Role of Root Architecture in Foraging Behavior of Entomopathogenic Nematodes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 122, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Tian, C.L.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhu, F.; Han, R.C.; Li, M.H. Research and Application Progresses of Mass Propagation Technology for Entomopathogenic Nematodes. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2024, 67, 872–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yan, X.; Gu, X.H.; Han, R.C. Research Advances in Using Entomopathogenic Nematodes to Control the Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda. J. Environ. Entomol. 2019, 41, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liao, C.; Zhang, S.; Fu, T.; Jin, X.; Xu, W.; Liu, D.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhu, T.; et al. Mutualistic Bacteria of Entomopathogenic Nematodes as an Insecticidal Agent for Sustainable Agriculture. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2025, 12, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Bhat, A.H.; Chaubey, A.K.; Askary, T.H. Global Distribution of Entomopathogenic Nematodes, Steinernema and Heterorhabditis. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2020, 30, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Fitters, P.F.L.; Griffin, C.T. Survival, Starvation, and Activity in Heterorhabditis megidis (Nematoda: Heterorhabditidae). Biol. Control 2006, 37, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Qian, X.J.; Gu, L.N.; Xing, Y.F.; Liu, C.Z. Occurrence of Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Gansu Province. Acta Agrestia Sin. 2014, 22, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Čačija, M.; Bažok, R.; Kolenc, M.; Bujas, T.; Drmić, Z.; Kadoić Balaško, M. Field Efficacy of Steinernema sp. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) on the Colorado Potato Beetle Overwintering Generation. Plants 2021, 10, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Toepfer, S.; Peters, A.; Ehlers, R.-U.; Kuhlmann, U. Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of Entomopathogenic Nematode Species at Reducing Western Corn Rootworm Larvae and Root Damage in Maize. J. Appl. Entomol. 2008, 132, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Mazurkiewicz, A.; Tumialis, D.; Jakubowska, M. Biological Control Potential of Native Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) against Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Agriculture 2020, 10, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Chen, S.; Li, J.; Han, X.; Moens, M. Effect of Temperature on the Pathogenicity of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernema and Heterorhabditis spp.) to Delia Radicum. BioControl 2003, 48, 713–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Tumialis, D.; Mazurkiewicz, A.; Florczak, L.; Skrzecz, I. The Potential of Entomopathogenic Nematodes of the Genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis for Biological Control of the Pine Lappet Moth Dendrolimus pini L. (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) in Scots Pine Stands. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2023, 96, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tumialis, D.; Skrzecz, I.; Mazurkiewicz, A.; Pezowicz, E. Sensitivity of Caterpillars of the Pine Tree Lappet Moth Dendrolimus pini to Native Isolates of Entomopathogenic Nematodes. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2019, 65, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Matuska-Łyżwa, J.; Żarnowiec, P.; Kaca, W. Comparison of Biological Activity of Field Isolates of Steinernema feltiae with a Commercial S. feltiae Biopesticide Product. Insects 2021, 12, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Hazir, S.; Keskin, N.; Stock, S.P.; Kaya, H.K.; Özcan, S. Diversity and Distribution of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) in Turkey. Biodivers. Conserv. 2003, 12, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Valadas, V.; Laranjo, M.; Mota, M.; Oliveira, S. A Survey of Entomopathogenic Nematode Species in Continental Portugal. J. Helminthol. 2014, 88, 327–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Vanlalhlimpuia; Lalramliana; Lalramnghaki, H.C.; Vanramliana. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Entomopathogenic Nematode, Heterorhabditis baujardi (Rhabditida, Heterorhabditidae) from Mizoram, Northeastern India. J. Parasit. Dis. 2018, 42, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  19. Askary, T.H.; Bhat, A.H.; Ahmad, M.J.; Chaubey, A.K.; Spiridonov, S.E. Steinernema feltiae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) from Hilly Areas of Kashmir Valley, India with a Note on Its Geographical Distribution. Russ. J. Nematol. 2020, 28, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matuska-Łyżwa, J.; Duda, S.; Nowak, D.; Kaca, W. Impact of Abiotic and Biotic Environmental Conditions on the Development and Infectivity of Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Agricultural Soils. Insects 2024, 15, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Shapiro-Ilan, D.I.; Brown, I.; Lewis, E.E. Freezing and Desiccation Tolerance in Entomopathogenic Nematodes: Diversity and Correlation of Traits. J. Nematol. 2014, 46, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Shapiro-Ilan, D.I.; Ment, D.; Ramakrishnan, J.; Rodríguez Hernández, M.G.; Duncan, L.W. A Century of Advancement in Entomopathogenic Nematode Formulation and Application Technology. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2025, 212, 108389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Koppenhöfer, A.M.; Luiza Sousa, A. Long-Term Suppression of Turfgrass Insect Pests with Native Persistent Entomopathogenic Nematodes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2024, 204, 108123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, J.H.; Tian, C.L.; Jiang, W.M.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, J.C.; Li, M.H. Advance on the Affect Factors of Entomopathogenic Nematode in Control of Cydia pomonella L. Plant Quar. 2024, 38, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Beck, B.; Spanoghe, P.; Moens, M.; Brusselman, E.; Temmerman, F.; Pollet, S.; Nuyttens, D. Improving the Biocontrol Potential of Steinernema feltiae against Delia radicum through Dosage, Application Technique and Timing. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Moisan, K.; Kostenko, O.; Galeano, M.; Soler, R.; Ent, S.V.D.; Hiltpold, I. The Sky Is Not the Limit: Successful Foliar Application of Steinernema spp. Entomopathogenic Nematodes to Control Lepidopteran Caterpillars. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2024, 206, 108163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Vaselek, S. The Role of Protists, Nematodes and Mites as Natural Control Agents of Sandfly Populations. Front. Trop. Dis. 2024, 5, 1369007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Abbas, M.S.T. Biological Control of Spodoptera frugiperda (Nixon) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in New Invaded Countries Using Insect Pathogens. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2024, 34, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Yu, H.; Ma, J.; Wang, R.Y.; Geng, Y.L.; Chen, S.L. Virulence of Entomopathogenic Nematodes against Sweetpotato Weevils. Chin. J. Biol. Control 2012, 28, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bai, G.Y.; Ma, H.K.; Wang, X.Y.; Wu, L.L.; Shen, G.S.; Gu, X.S.; Ruan, W.B. Research Progress on Controlling Bradysia odoriphaga by Entomopathogenic Nematodes. China Plant Prot. 2015, 35, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, H.; Fan, K.; Li, X.; Cao, G.P.; Sun, R.H. Virulence and Control Effect of Entomopathogenic Nematodes against Agrotis ypsilon (Rottemberg). J. Plant Prot. 2015, 42, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jaffuel, G.; Sbaiti, I.; Turlings, T.C.J. Encapsulated Entomopathogenic Nematodes Can Protect Maize Plants from Diabrotica balteata Larvae. Insects 2019, 11, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Han, W.S.; Wang, Z.R.; Liu, Y.; Gao, J.L.; Zhao, D.X.; Zhong, Y.H.; Zhang, S. Effects Evaluation of Different Entomopathogenic Nematode Strains Against Aethina tumida (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae). Chin. J. Trop. Crops 2021, 42, 1402–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kajuga, J.; Hategekimana, A.; Yan, X.; Waweru, B.W.; Li, H.; Li, K.; Yin, J.; Cao, L.; Karanja, D.; Umulisa, C.; et al. Management of White Grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae) with Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Rwanda. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2018, 28, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Zhong, B.Z.; Lü, C.J.; Li, C.X.; Qin, W.Q. Isolation and Virulence of Entomogenic Nematodes against Tirathaba rufivena in Areca Plantation of Hainan. Chin. J. Biol. Control 2021, 37, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Q.Z.; Cai, J.Y.; Zhang, X.H. Entomopathogenic Nematodes for Biocontrol of Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda and Their Indoor/Field Control Efficiency and Influencing Factors. J. Plant Prot. 2023, 50, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zheng, H.Z.; Yang, K.L.; Qin, Y.N.; Guo, W.J.; Wen, J.B. Impacts of Three Chemical Pesticides on Infectivity of Entomopathogenic Nematode against Eucryptorrhynchus brandti. J. Environ. Entomol. 2021, 43, 1312–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Andaló, V.; Moino, A., Jr.; Maximiniano, C.; Campos, V.P.; Mendonça, L.A. Influence of Temperature and Duration of Storage on the Lipid Reserves of Entomopathogenic Nematodes. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 2011, 37, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Singh, A.K.; Kumar, M.; Ahuja, A.; Vinay, B.K.; Kommu, K.K.; Thakur, S.; Paschapur, A.U.; Jeevan, B.; Mishra, K.K.; Meena, R.P.; et al. Entomopathogenic Nematodes. In Biopesticides; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 73–92. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hara, A.H.; Kaya, H.K.; Gaugler, R.; Lebeck, L.M.; Mello, C.L. Entomopathogenic Nematodes for Biological Control of the Leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii (Dipt.: Agromyzidae). Entomophaga 1993, 38, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Dolinski, C.; Lacey, L.A. Microbial Control of Arthropod Pests of Tropical Tree Fruits. Neotrop. Entomol. 2007, 36, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Glazer, I.; Simões, N.; Eleftherianos, I.; Ramakrishnan, J.; Ment, D.; Toubarro, D.; Mallick, S. Entomopathogenic Nematodes: Survival, Virulence and Immunity. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2025, 212, 108363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Spence, K.O.; Stevens, G.N.; Arimoto, H.; Ruiz-Vega, J.; Kaya, H.K.; Lewis, E.E. Effect of Insect Cadaver Desiccation and Soil Water Potential during Rehydration on Entomopathogenic Nematode (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) Production and Virulence. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2011, 106, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Grewal, P.S. Enhanced Ambient Storage Stability of an Entomopathogenic Nematode through Anhydrobiosis. Pest Manag. Sci. 2000, 56, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Kagimu, N.; Malan, A.P. Formulation of South African Entomopathogenic Nematodes Using Alginate Beads and Diatomaceous Earth. BioControl 2019, 64, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Lalitha, K.; Nithya, K.; Bharathi, B.G.; Venkatesan, S.; Shivakumar, M.S. Long-Term Storage Does Not Affect the Infectivity of Entomopathogenic Nematodes on Insect Hosts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Sharghi, H.; Eivazian Kary, N.; Mohammadi, D. Enhancing the Shelf Life of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Formulation: The Impact of Super Absorbent Polymer and Infective Juveniles Concentration. Crop Prot. 2025, 190, 107091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Karimipour Fard, H.; Saeidi, K. Biopesticides from Entomopathogenic Nematodes. Plant Pathol. Sci. 2019, 8, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Touray, M.; Gulcu, B.; Ulug, D.; Gulsen, S.H.; Cimen, H.; Kaya, H.K.; Cakmak, I.; Hazir, S. Evaluation of Different Sponge Types on the Survival and Infectivity of Stored Entomopathogenic Nematodes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2020, 171, 107332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Lu, L.; Kang, Z.; Sun, S.; Li, T.; Li, H. The Life-History Traits of Soil-Dwelling Nematode (Acrobeloides sp.) Exhibit More Resilience to Water Restriction Than Caenorhabditis elegans. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2024, 64, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  51. Sanda, N.B. Effect of Temperatures on the Pathogenicity of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora) for Biocontrol of Octodonta nipae (Maulik). Niger. J. Entomol. 2020, 36, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Wang, A.; Fang, M.; Sun, J.; Wei, X.; Ruan, W. Investigation of Indigenous Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Guangxi and Its Biological Control of Spodoptera frugiperda. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Kaya, H.K.; Stock, P.S. Techniques in Insect Nematology. In Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology; Lacey, L.A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; pp. 281–324. [Google Scholar]
  54. Koppenhofer, A.M.; Kaya, H.K. Density-Dependent Effects on Steinernema glaseri (Nematoda: Steinernematidae) within an Insect Host. J. Parasitol. 1995, 81, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Yan, X.; Han, R.C. Production Technology of the Bio-Insecticides: Entomopathogenic Nematodes. J. Environ. Entomol. 2016, 38, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mukhopadhyay, A.; Antil, J.; Khatkar, A.; Pandey, D.; Somvanshi, V.S.; Nebapure, S.M.; Dutta, A.; Singh, A. A Laboratory Study on Survival and Infectivity of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Formulated in Gum Katira-Based Biogel Compositions. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2024, 131, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Aryal, S.; Nielsen, U.N.; Sumaya, N.H.; Wilson, C.; Riegler, M. Effect of Temperature on Survival of Australian Entomopathogenic and Their Virulence against the Queensland Fruit Fly, Bactrocera tryoni. BioControl 2022, 67, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Beltrán-Martí, R.; Resecco, M.; Gonella, E.; Prieto, S.V.; Pittarello, M.; Garcerá, C.; Chueca, P.; Alma, A.; Gioelli, F.; Grella, M. Identifying Key Parameters for Reliable Assessment of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Viability as Affected by Spray Application Stress-related Factors. Pest Manag. Sci. 2025, 81, 4799–4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Gulzar, S.; Usman, M.; Wakil, W.; Gulcu, B.; Hazir, C.; Karagoz, M.; Hazir, S.; Shapiro-Ilan, D.I. Environmental Tolerance of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Differs Among Nematodes Arising from Host Cadavers versus Aqueous Suspension. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2020, 175, 107452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  60. Selvan, S.; Gaugler, R.; Lewis, E.E. Biochemical Energy Reserves of Entomopathogenic Nematodes. J. Parasitol. 1993, 79, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Jagdale, G.B.; Grewal, P.S. Acclimation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes to Novel Temperatures: Trehalose Accumulation and the Acquisition of Thermotolerance. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  62. Lillis, P.E.; Kennedy, I.P.; Carolan, J.C.; Griffin, C.T. Low-Temperature Exposure Has Immediate and Lasting Effects on the Stress Tolerance, Chemotaxis and Proteome of Entomopathogenic Nematodes. Parasitology 2023, 150, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. O’Leary, S.A.; Power, A.P.; Stack, C.M.; Burnell, A.M. Behavioural and Physiological Responses of Infective Juveniles of the Entomopathogenic Nematode Heterorhabditis to Desiccation. BioControl 2001, 46, 345–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Qian, X.J. Entomopathogenic Nematodes Resources of Gansu Province and Its Adaptation to Abiotic Stress. Doctoral Dissertation, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  65. Shibao, H.; Kutsukake, M.; Matsuyama, S.; Fukatsu, T. Linoleic Acid as Corpse Recognition Signal in a Social Aphid. Zool. Lett. 2022, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  66. Chambers, B.D.; Leskey, T.C.; Pearce, A.R.; Kuhar, T.P. Responses of Overwintering Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) to Dead Conspecifics. J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 1489–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  67. Mastore, M.; Quadroni, S.; Toscano, A.; Mottadelli, N.; Brivio, M.F. Susceptibility to Entomopathogens and Modulation of Basal Immunity in Two Insect Models at Different Temperatures. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 79, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  68. Lee, J.H.; Dillman, A.R.; Hallem, E.A. Temperature-Dependent Changes in the Host-Seeking Behaviors of Parasitic Nematodes. BMC Biol. 2016, 14, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  69. Shapiro-Ilan, D.I.; Mbata, G.N.; Nguyen, K.B.; Peat, S.M.; Blackburn, D.; Adams, B.J. Characterization of Biocontrol Traits in the Entomopathogenic Nematode Heterorhabditis Georgiana (Kesha Strain), and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Nematode’s Symbiotic Bacteria. Biol. Control 2009, 51, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Devi, G. Influence of Abiotic Factors on Efficacy of Entomopathogenic Nematodes. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2024, 36, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Shaurub, E.H.; Soliman, N.A.; Hashem, A.G.; Abdel-Rahman, A.M. Infectivity of Four Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Relation to Environmental Factors and Their Effects on the Biochemistry of the Medfly Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2015, 44, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Glazer, I.; Salame, L. Osmotic Survival of the Entomopathogenic Nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Biol. Control 2000, 18, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Feng, S.P.; Han, R.C. Advances in Storage and Formulation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Steinernema and Heterorhabditis. Plant Prot. 2005, 31, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jin, Y.L.; Han, R.C. Infectivity of Steinernema carpocapsae All Strain to the Diamondback Moth on Cabbage Leaves. Plant Prot. 2009, 35, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jin, Y.L.; Han, R.C.; Cong, B. Screening of Adjuvants for Entomopathogenic Nematodes of Steinernema carpocapsae A11 Strain in Foliar Application. Plant Prot. 2013, 39, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kaya, H.K.; Aguillera, M.M.; Alumai, A.; Choo, H.Y.; de la Torre, M.; Fodor, A.; Ganguly, S.; Hazır, S.; Lakatos, T.; Pye, A.; et al. Status of Entomopathogenic Nematodes and Their Symbiotic Bacteria from Selected Countries or Regions of the World. Biol. Control 2006, 38, 134–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Andaló, V.; Cavalcanti, R.S.; Molina, J.P.; Moino Júnior, A.; Magalhães, F.H.L. Aeration Influence in Storage of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Rhabditida) Under Laboratory Conditions. Nematol. Bras. 2006, 30, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Laboratory propagation of EPNs using the White-Trap method.
Figure 1. Laboratory propagation of EPNs using the White-Trap method.
Insects 17 00723 g001
Figure 2. Temporal dynamics of survival rates during 18-week storage for H. megidis 0627M (panel (A)) and S. feltiae 0619HT (panel (B)) under different combinations of temperature and moisture content. Data points represent mean survival rates. Different marker shapes and colors denote the temperature treatments. RT: room temperature (25 °C); LT: low temperature (6 °C).
Figure 2. Temporal dynamics of survival rates during 18-week storage for H. megidis 0627M (panel (A)) and S. feltiae 0619HT (panel (B)) under different combinations of temperature and moisture content. Data points represent mean survival rates. Different marker shapes and colors denote the temperature treatments. RT: room temperature (25 °C); LT: low temperature (6 °C).
Insects 17 00723 g002
Figure 3. Survival Rates of Different Nematode Species under Various Storage Conditions over Time. Note: 55%, 48%, and 42% represent moisture content levels; RT denotes room temperature, LT denotes low temperature. The color gradient from red to green indicates nematode survival rates from high to low. Symbols denote differences between temperatures at the same time point: *: Significant difference (p < 0.05); **: Highly significant difference (p < 0.01); NS: No significant difference (p > 0.05).
Figure 3. Survival Rates of Different Nematode Species under Various Storage Conditions over Time. Note: 55%, 48%, and 42% represent moisture content levels; RT denotes room temperature, LT denotes low temperature. The color gradient from red to green indicates nematode survival rates from high to low. Symbols denote differences between temperatures at the same time point: *: Significant difference (p < 0.05); **: Highly significant difference (p < 0.01); NS: No significant difference (p > 0.05).
Insects 17 00723 g003
Figure 4. Virulence of Different Nematode Species under Different Storage Conditions at 18 Weeks. Asterisks (**) and NS indicate significant differences in virulence between different species at the same temperature and the same species at different temperatures: ** for highly significant (p < 0.01), and NS for not significant (p > 0.05). Different lowercase letters in different colors indicate significant differences between different moisture content levels for the same nematode species at the same temperature (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). The horizontal dashed line at 100% represents the week 0 virulence of freshly harvested IJs (≤5 days post-emergence).
Figure 4. Virulence of Different Nematode Species under Different Storage Conditions at 18 Weeks. Asterisks (**) and NS indicate significant differences in virulence between different species at the same temperature and the same species at different temperatures: ** for highly significant (p < 0.01), and NS for not significant (p > 0.05). Different lowercase letters in different colors indicate significant differences between different moisture content levels for the same nematode species at the same temperature (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). The horizontal dashed line at 100% represents the week 0 virulence of freshly harvested IJs (≤5 days post-emergence).
Insects 17 00723 g004
Table 1. Tests of fixed effects on nematode survival rate from the generalized linear mixed model.
Table 1. Tests of fixed effects on nematode survival rate from the generalized linear mixed model.
SourceNum dfDen dfFp
Storage Time186618.683<0.001
Moisture266156.624<0.001
Species166129.36<0.001
Temperature166171.139<0.001
Temperature × Moisture2584100.883<0.001
Species × Temperature158438.005<0.001
Species × Moisture258444.733<0.001
Temperature × Storage Time185840.8330.662
Species × Storage Time185840.540.939
Moisture × Storage Time365840.2041.000
Species × Temperature × Moisture24920.0190.981
Species × Temperature × Storage Time184921.5340.074
Species × Moisture × Storage Time364921.5380.026
Temperature × Moisture × Storage Time364922.143<0.001
Species × Temperature × Moisture × Storage Time22745617.923<0.001
Note. Results are based on Type III F-tests for fixed effects from a generalized linear mixed-effects model with a binomial distribution and logit link function. Subject ID was included as a random intercept to account for repeated measurements. Degrees of freedom were estimated using the Satterthwaite approximation.
Table 2. Parameter estimates and odds ratios from the generalized linear mixed model for the survival of two EPN species.
Table 2. Parameter estimates and odds ratios from the generalized linear mixed model for the survival of two EPN species.
Variable ComparisonB SE Waldp-ValueExp(B)
(OR)
95% CI for Exp(B)
LL UL
SpeciesS. feltiae 0619HT vs.
H. megidis 0627M (Ref)
−1.1160.206−5.432<0.0010.3280.2190.49
Temperature6 °C vs. 25 °C (Ref)−1.7380.206−8.459<0.0010.1760.1170.263
Moisture content 55% vs. 48% (Ref)2.3140.2539.15<0.00110.1146.15516.618
42% vs. 48% (Ref)−0.060.25−0.2410.8100.9420.5771.537
Note: The model used a binomial distribution with a logit link function, with DeadCount/TotalCount as the target variable. (Ref.) indicates the reference category for each variable. Exp(B) represents the odds ratio (OR). 95% CI represents the 95% confidence interval for the odds ratio. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Table 3. Virulence and VRI of H. megidis 0627M and S. feltiae 0619HT after 18 weeks of storage under different conditions.
Table 3. Virulence and VRI of H. megidis 0627M and S. feltiae 0619HT after 18 weeks of storage under different conditions.
MoistureTemperatureSpeciesnMean Mortality (%) ± SD
55%Room TemperatureH. megidis 0627M30.00 ± 0.00
55%Room TemperatureS. feltiae 0619HT345.94 ± 5.32
55%Low TemperatureH. megidis 0627M357.10 ± 5.07
55%Low TemperatureS. feltiae 0619HT378.66 ± 4.35
48%Room TemperatureH. megidis 0627M388.89 ± 2.01
48%Room TemperatureS. feltiae 0619HT377.80 ± 3.07
48%Low TemperatureH. megidis 0627M388.89 ± 1.29
48%Low TemperatureS. feltiae 0619HT388.89 ± 1.70
42%Room TemperatureH. megidis 0627M373.26 ± 2.78
42%Room TemperatureS. feltiae 0619HT375.33 ± 3.61
42%Low TemperatureH. megidis 0627M386.44 ± 5.57
42%Low TemperatureS. feltiae 0619HT388.34 ± 4.73
ControlFresh Ijs3100.00 ± 0.00
No-nematode control30.00 ± 0.00
Note: Values represent the mean mortality ± standard deviation (SD) from three biological replicates per treatment. Each replicate contained 6 larvae, with a total of 18 larvae tested per treatment group. The Week 0 Control (freshly emerged IJs) exhibited 100.00 ± 0.00% mortality, and its VRI was set to 100. The no-nematode control group consistently showed 0.00% mortality across all experiments. Because week-0 virulence of freshly emerged IJs was 100%, VRI values are numerically identical to week-18 mean mortality values and are therefore omitted as a separate column. “—” indicates not applicable.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, T.; Qian, X. Effects of Temperature-Moisture Interactions on Storage Survival and Virulence in Two Entomopathogenic Nematode Species. Insects 2026, 17, 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17070723

AMA Style

Li H, Zhang K, Zhang T, Qian X. Effects of Temperature-Moisture Interactions on Storage Survival and Virulence in Two Entomopathogenic Nematode Species. Insects. 2026; 17(7):723. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17070723

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Hongyan, Kexin Zhang, Tingwei Zhang, and Xiujuan Qian. 2026. "Effects of Temperature-Moisture Interactions on Storage Survival and Virulence in Two Entomopathogenic Nematode Species" Insects 17, no. 7: 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17070723

APA Style

Li, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, T., & Qian, X. (2026). Effects of Temperature-Moisture Interactions on Storage Survival and Virulence in Two Entomopathogenic Nematode Species. Insects, 17(7), 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17070723

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop