Next Article in Journal
Distribution of Larval Habitats and Efficiency of Various Trap Settings to Monitor Sympatric Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in La Reunion
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Traps for Spotted Lanternflies, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae), by Leveraging Their Own Signals
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/insects16090931
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence, Biological Characteristics, and Annual Dynamics of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in China

by
Zihao Zhou
,
Yujie Luo
,
Jiawei Qin
,
Xintong Wang
,
Shuaijun Ning
,
Jing He
and
Qiong Zhou
*
College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(9), 931; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090931
Submission received: 8 July 2025 / Revised: 11 August 2025 / Accepted: 12 August 2025 / Published: 4 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Simple Summary

Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) is a severely underestimated agricultural pest, posing a potential threat to agriculture that far exceeds expectations. However, the general public considers A. orientalis to be a saprophytic and sanitary pest. This study presents the occurrence and host plants of A. orientalis in China, and further reports the morphological characteristics, developmental stages, and color preferences of A. orientalis. In addition, the population dynamics of A. orientalis in Changsha City have been recorded to strengthen the attention and research of researchers on this pest.

Abstract

Atherigona orientalis (Diptera: Muscidae) may be a neglected agricultural pest worldwide since the public generally regards it as a saprophytic and sanitary insect. In fact, A. orientalis can infest over 50 varieties of fruits and vegetables in 26 families listed as quarantine pests in several countries. Regrettably, there are few reports of this pest despite its prevalence in the pantropical regions of many countries. In this study, we reported the distributions, morphological, and biological characteristics, including the host ranges, developmental durations, color selections, and population dynamics changes of A. orientalis in Hunan Province. Currently, A. orientalis has been found in each prefectural and municipal city of Hunan Province, China. Additionally, 15 out of 20 host plants we collected were infested. The developmental durations of the egg, larva, and pupa of A. orientalis ranged from 2 to 3, 5 to 7, and 6 to 8 days, respectively. The results of color selections showed that A. orientalis adults tend to prefer green and yellow colors. Moreover, the population dynamics of A. orientalis in Changsha City showed that July and August were the population peaks throughout the year. Our research supplements valuable data of A. orientalis for pest management and subsequent studies.

1. Introduction

The current situation and elaborate biological characteristics are the basis for understanding the behavior, value, and risk assessment of organisms, especially pests and invasive species [1,2,3,4]. In general, the habitat and survival of a pest can be regulated and limited by its biological characteristics, providing more countermeasures for population control and diffuse limitation of pests or invasive species [5,6]. For instance, the attractants currently in use to control pests have been developed primarily based on their feeding and reproduction characteristics [7,8,9]. Sex pheromones or food lures developed based on the biological characteristics of agricultural pests, such as Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet 1899) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and B. dorsalis (Hendel 1984) (Diptera: Tephritidae), have demonstrated strong green control capabilities in controlling population sizes [10,11,12]. For B. mianx (Enderlein 1898) (Diptera: Tephritidae), for which specific lures have not been developed yet, control could be mainly achieved through the use of a green sticky ball (invented based on the preferred color of B. mianx) [13]. Controlling several key biological characteristics can effectively limit the colonization and spread of pests [14,15,16].
Atherigona orientalis Schiner (1868) is an “underrated” invasive pest able to infest over 50 varieties of fruits and vegetables in 26 families (data from: https://www.cabi.org/). However, attention to this pest has focused primarily on its carrion-feeding characteristics and not its phytophagous activities [17,18,19]. In effect, the damage to agriculture caused by A. orientalis is more serious than the public considers. Generally, the adult individuals lay the eggs on the cracks or grooves of the hosts, such as the permanent calyx of pepper Capsicum annuum (Linnaeus 1753) (Solanales: Solanaceae), further feeding on the flesh of the host by the hatchable larvae [20]. In addition, A. orientalis is able to develop in decaying fruit as well as animal carcasses or feces, resulting in the proliferation of a significant quantity of germs [21] which would accelerate decay and damage to crops in the pest-infested area. As a pantropical pest, A. orientalis has a predominant distribution ranging from 20° N to 20° S [22,23,24]. Countries such as South Korea, the Dominican Republic, and Cambodia have classified A. orientalis as a quarantine pest. The United States has included in the entire genus of Atherigona on its list of quarantine pests since 2017 (http://www.pestchina.com/#/) [25,26]. In China, A. orientalis has been documented in most southern provinces, including Zhejiang, Hunan, Fujian, Guangdong, and Guangxi, as well as in certain northern provinces such as Hebei and Ningxia, where its presence has been reported in association with decaying fruits [25,27]. Despite the fact that A. orientalis are present in many regions across the globe, the precise location of the origin and how they disseminated remains to be elucidated. With the climate warming and increased trade, there is a risk of A. orientalis spreading northwards, even though no colonization of A. orientalis has been found in Northern regions yet [18,19,28]. Additionally, due to the harsh survival habitat, large-scale outbreaks of A. orientalis populations with pathogens are also prone to ecological degradation and biodiversity loss. To date, unfortunately, data on the biological characteristics of A. orientalis are rarely reported, which is essential to supply the related information to develop effective countermeasures.
In the current study, we investigated the distribution of A. orientalis in Hunan Province (China), described the key morphological characteristics of adult A. orientalis that can be used to distinguish them from other closely related species, and further described the basic morphological characteristics of A. orientalis in different immature stages (including eggs, 3-instar larva, and puparium). In addition, the development duration, host plant, different color tendencies, and population dynamics of A. orientalis were explored to provide valuable information on the biological characteristics for a subsequent prevention and control strategy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Distribution and Hosts Survey of the Atherigona orientalis in Hunan Province

Ranging from June 2020 to December 2022, a total of 41 sites in 14 prefectural and municipal cities in Hunan Province were sampled for 20 rotting melons and fruits in total, including chili pepper Capsicum annuum (Linnaeus 1753) (Solanales: Solanaceae), bitter melon Momordica charantia (Linnaeus 1753) (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), loofa Luffa aegyptiaca (Miller 1768) (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), tomato Solanum lycopersicum (Linnaeus 1753) (Solanales: Solanaceae), eggplant Solanum melongena (Linnaeus 1753) (Solanales: Solanaceae), muskmelon Cucumis melo (Linnaeus 1753) (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), yellow peach Prunus persica (Linnaeus 1753) (Rosales: Rosaceae), and others (Supplementary Table S1). The longitude, latitude, and collection date are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Decaying crops collected as described above were further cultivated in the insect cages (30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm) in an artificial climate incubator with the conditions of temperature 25–30 °C, humidness 70 to 80%, photoperiod 14 L:10 D. The insect cages were checked daily to determine if any flies had emerged, and the adults were identified based on morphological characteristics. The emerged adults were collected according to the sampling region and different hosts.

2.2. Morphological Characterization of Different Developmental Stages of Atherigona orientalis

The morphology of A. orientalis at different developmental stages (including the adult, egg, larva, and pupa) was observed and photographed using the stereoscope (Leica S8AP0, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The photographs were synthesized using a Helicon Focus 6 system. The male and female adults were presented with the habitus in lateral view, thorax in dorsal view, head in lateral and overhead view, legs and abdomen in dorsal view, and further marked the main differences in legs and abdomen between males and females. The eggs were principally characterized by their morphology and surface reticulation. The larva was chiefly described in terms of its habitus in lateral view. The pupa was described in terms of the color change in the puparium and ring folds of the posterior peritremes.

2.3. Developmental Duration of Each Insect State of Atherigona orientalis

The infested crops with the larvae of A. orientalis were collected from Wangcheng vegetable land (Changsha, Hunan: 112.80° N, 28.37° E), further rearing on fresh peppers C. annuum with experimental conditions of photoperiod 14 L:10 D, temperature 28 ± 1 °C, and relative humidness 60 to 80%, until they pupate naturally to larvae. The feathered adults were reared separately with yeast, brown sugar, and distilled water at 1:3:50.
Five pairs of adult A. orientalis were placed in each cage and repeated eight times (40 pairs of A. orientalis in total). The eggs were collected from chili peppers twice daily at 12:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. using a water-dipped brush. The eggs were then counted and preserved on moist filter paper in a Petri dish. Daily observations were processed to record the hatching of eggs, the pupariation of larvae, the eclosion times, and the time of longevity of the adults. In this part, a total of 40 adult pairs, 80 eggs, 60 larvae, and 50 pupae were observed and recorded.
The Weibull distribution model was used to anticipate the expected longevity of male and female adult A. orientalis. The cumulative mortality curve of adults, scale parameter (η), and shape parameter (β) were produced and visualized using Matlab software (v R2024b). LT50 values (the time interval after which the population of the parasitoid was reduced to half) were also calculated from fitted Weibull curves.

2.4. The Color Selections of Adult Atherigona orientalis

The transparent shellac was evenly spread on the different color (including red, orange, yellow, green, blue, purple, and black) cardstocks (7.5 × 7.5 cm). The glued cardstocks were randomly pasted on a well-lit wall, and the number of adult A. orientalis caught on different color cardstocks was counted at 1-month intervals for a period of three months (30 September 2021–30 December 2021). Duncan’s multiple range test (SPSS v 13.0) was used to analyze the significant difference between each host and cardstock (p < 0.05).

2.5. Monitoring of Atherigona orientalis Population Dynamics

The population dynamics of A. orientalis were monitored in fruit and vegetable fields around the campus of Hunan Normal University in Yuelu District (Changsha, Hunan). Based on field visits, 7 fruit and vegetable plots were selected as a test site for the survey, distributed at the junction of residential areas and the Yuelu Mountain forest, with crop shops, supermarkets, open dumps, and canteens as well (Supplementary Table S2). The information on test sites is listed in Table 1. Owing to the previous study on the color selection, yellow cardstocks were shellac-dipped and applied as a monitoring tool, using 5 cardstocks for each site. The yellow cardstocks were required to hang on a pergola or branch about 1.5 m above the ground, not shaded by leaves or in direct sunlight.
The research was conducted from 1 March 2022 to 31 March 2023, of which no recording was conducted from 1 December 2022 to 15 February 2023 owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the low peak period of A. orientalis population, 1 March 2022 to 1 June 2022 and 1 October 2022 to 31 March 2023, the cardstocks were changed once a month, while in the peak population period, 1 June 2022 to 1 October 2022, the cardstocks were replaced every 10 days. The number of A. orientalis on replaced cardstocks was counted, and they were stored in 75% ethyl alcohol.

3. Result

3.1. Distribution and Host Ranges of Atherigona orientalis in Hunan Province

Except for cucumber, plum, peach, fig, and red dates, A. orientalis was found in all 15 investigated host plant species (Table 1). In addition to A. orientalis, several Tephritidae species emerged from hosts as well, including Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet 1899) (Diptera: Tephritidae), Bactrocera latifrons (Hendel 1984) (Diptera: Tephritidae), Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel 1984) (Diptera: Tephritidae), Bactrocera minax (Enderlein 1898) (Diptera: Tephritidae), and Bactrocera ruiliensis (Wang 2008) (Diptera: Tephritidae) (Table 1). In terms of the number of emerging A. orientalis, the largest number of 1392 was from chili pepper, followed by bitter melon (694), luffa (163), tomato (117), eggplant (72), melon (61), yellow peach (44), and tangerine (42). Further combined with the hatching rate, several hosts with large emergence numbers had high percentages as well, such as chili pepper (99.43%), tomato (100%), bitter melon (84.62%), and eggplant (100%) (Table 1). On the whole, A. orientalis was found in most investigated hosts with large numbers, of which the chili peppers were infested most by A. orientalis.

3.2. Morphological Characteristics of Atherigona orientalis in Various Stages

The morphological characteristics of A. orientalis in different developmental stages, including adults, eggs, larvae, and puparium, were described. The adults were mainly described in terms of the key morphological characteristics to differentiate them from other closely related species. The detailed morphological descriptions of adult A. orientalis can be referred to in Suh SJ and Pont [17,29]. The descriptions of A. orientalis eggs, larvae, and puparium were based to Couri [30], and Grzywacz [26], and Ferrar [31], separately.

Key Morphological Characteristics of Atherigona orientalis Adults

The side views of female and male individuals are listed in Figure 1A,B, with the female body length ranging from 4.7 to 5.2 mm and the male body length ranging from 3.2 to 4.3 mm (Figure 1A,B). The following key biological characteristics distinguish A. orientalis from other closely related species: 1: the basal lateral setula of scutellum at least one-third as long as sub-basal lateral seta (Figure 1C,D); 2: the male palpi are elongate but not clubbed, with fine hairs along the apical ventral part (Figure 1E); 3: the r-m beyond middle of cell dm (Figure 1F); 4: the male fore femur displayed a shallow dorsal preapical excavation with dense setulae (Figure 1G); 5: trifoliate process absent (Figure 1H).
Eggs: The eggs of A. orientalis are cylindrical-like, about 0.82 in length and 0.2 mm in width, and appear creamy-white with a polygonal reticulated structure on the surface. The reticulation is formed by 16–18 longitudinal ribs intersecting fine transverse striae. Moreover, the extremities have narrow, centrolateral projections (Figure 2A).
Larvae: We summarized the basal characteristics of 3 days-old A. orientalis larva for preliminary identification. The body length of 3 days-old larva ranges from 4.0 to 5.6 mm with 12 typical calyptrate body segments in total, including 1 pseudocephalon (upper left of Figure 2B), 3 thoracic segments, 7 abdominal segments, and 1 anal segment carrying posterior spiracles (Figure 2B). The black poststigmas of 3 days-old larva are distinctly raised with 3 curvilinear ostiums (bottom right of Figure 2B).
Puparium: The puparium of A. orientalis is barrel-shaped, with yellow or orange color in the early stages of pupation. The color of the puparium deepens to a reddish brown over time. Width 1.04–1.18 mm and length 3.42–3.85 mm (Figure 2C–E). Posterior spiracles with three straight slits and anterior spiracles conical were bearing 6–8 lobes (Figure 2F,G).

3.3. The Development Duration of Atherigona orientalis in Different Stages

Under the conditions of photoperiod 14 L:10 D, temperature 28 ± 1 °C, and relative humidity of 60 to 80%, the developmental durations of the egg, larva, and pupa of the A. orientalis were 2 to 3, 5 to 7, and 6 to 8 days, respectively. Moreover, without nutritional supplementation, females could survive for 2–3 days and males for 1–2 days. In contrast, when fed normally, females survived for a maximum of 15 days with an average of 11 days, while males for 12 days and 8 days on average, respectively (Table 2).
The cumulative mortality curves of male and female A. orientalis adults are shown in Figure 3. The proportion surviving at each time interval is presented along with the fitted Weibull curve, and the observed longevity basically overlaps with the predicted curves (Figure 3). The values of Weibull parameters (η and β) and LT50 are included in Table 3.

3.4. The Color Selections of Adult Atherigona orientalis

Figure 4 shows the results of color selection by A. orientalis. The significant differences in the color selection by A. orientalis were analyzed using Duncan’s multiple range test (SPSS v 13.0). There is a significant difference in seven colors, of which the percentage of yellow and green is significantly higher than other colors (p < 0.05) (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S3). For the first and second month, the selection followed with yellow and green > red, orange, blue, purple, and black. For third month, the selection followed with green and yellow > orange > red, blue, purple, and black. In general, of the seven colors an adult A. orientalis prefers yellow and green.

3.5. Dynamics Monitoring of Atherigona orientalis Around Changsha City

According to the results of color selections, yellow sticky traps were used to monitor changes in population dynamics of A. orientalis. From 1 March 2022 to 31 March 2023, the population dynamics of A. orientalis were monitored for nearly one year at the seven sites around Changsha City. The results have shown that A. orientalis occurred from early March, and the population rose gradually with increasing temperature till to June. After June, the A. orientalis population increased rapidly owing to the scorching temperatures until September, when the population began to decline quickly as the temperature cooled. Figure 4 has shown that the changes in population were strongly influenced by local temperature. Additionally, the caught number of male and female individuals suggests that the sex composition of A. orientalis was more females and fewer males (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S4).

4. Discussion

Host range, as one of the reference factors for pest damage risk assessment, is a main limitation for the dispersal of pests as well and a wider host range for a pest is more difficult to control and manage [32,33,34]. Correspondingly, varied host ranges would further promote the rapid spread or invasion of pests [35,36]. A. orientalis is both a phytophagous and saprophagous insect with a diverse host range and staggering adaptability, resulting in its widespread distribution in the pantropic. Furthermore, its initial origin is unclear [17,37]. In China, the documented spread of A. orientalis encompasses all the southern provinces and several northern provinces (http://col.especies.cn/). In this study we collected 20 usual carrion crops in 14 prefectures and municipalities in Hunan Province, to investigate the distributions and hosts of A. orientalis, of which the chili pepper was infested most seriously. Our results were consistent with those of Ogbalu et al., who found that A. orientalis infested a large number of crops, mainly chili peppers and tomatoes [38]. Hunan is one of the provinces with the largest area of chili pepper cultivation in China, which is generally sown in April and harvested from July to September [39], which is the peak of A. orientalis population. The ripening of chili peppers provided a hospitable environment for the A. orientalis, which in turn led to an increase in population. The massive infestation in turn led to detached rotting of the chili peppers which further led to an increase in the population of A. orientalis owing to the saprophytic characteristics, and ultimately this led to a negative cycle [23,25]. Therefore, the control measures for adult A. orientalis should be processed before June, which is before the fruiting period of chili peppers.
The initial step in comprehending insects is the mastery of their morphological characteristics, especially the pests. Currently, the utilization of visual representations to expedite the identification and recognition of pests is emerging as a formidable tool for initial management strategies [40,41]. For A. orientalis adults, many studies have provided the key morphological characteristics to distinguish closely related species of the same genus [17,19,28]. Bohart and Greesitt [42] created the cephalopharyngeal skeleton of the 1 to 3 days-old larvae of A. orientalis and the overall schematic diagram of the 3rd instar larva. Couri and AraúJo [30] briefly characterized the three larval instars and provided the full view cephalopharyngeal skeleton, prostigma and poststigma, and ventral creeping welt diagrams for each instar larva. In 2014, Grzywacz and Pape [43] reported the ink illustrations and color plates of skull structures of the 1st to 3rd A. orientalis larva, and further described the morphology of larva from the 1st to 3rd instar using optical and scanning electron microscopy. Concerning the morphological characteristics of pupae, there are fewer descriptions of A. orientalis pupae, with only Skidmore [22] briefly describing the cephalopharyngeal skeleton of the pupa. In this study, we characterize the key morphological characteristics of A. orientalis adults as well as the basic morphological characteristics of other immature stages, intending to provide usable data for agricultural and ecological protections at the first opportunity.
Previous researchers tested the developmental duration of A. orientalis under different conditions. Skidmore et al. [22] (under 29.44 °C) reported that the developmental duration of eggs, larvae, and pupa needed 12 h, 5 d, and 6 d, respectively. Herawani et al. [20] (under the temperature 25–27 °C and relative humidity 60%) reported that the eggs, larvae, and pupa needed 1.62 d, 11.93 d, and 5.08 d, respectively, and that the average longevity of females was 32.85 d and males was 31.40 d. In this study, the developmental duration of A. orientalis eggs, larvae, and pupa needed 2–3 d, 5–7 d, and 6–8 d, respectively, under the conditions of photoperiod 14 L:10 D, temperature 28 ± 1 °C, and relative humidity 60–80%. Under the same conditions the average longevity of females was 3–15 d and males was 1–12 d, which indicates that the developmental durations of A. orientalis were affected by different environmental conditions and so the control strategies need to be flexible according to the local environmental factors.
For color selection, the A. orientalis numbers on yellow and green cardstocks were significantly higher than other colors, suggesting that the preference for color by A. orientalis might be related to the preferred hosts, such as Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae crops. Furthermore, creating or developing efficient control strategies and products based on the color preferences of pests is also one of the important ways to control pests. For instance, Bactrocera minax and B. dorsalis, as two destructive pests, were found to have a preference for green and yellow colors, respectively, for which researchers have developed color-specific traps with remarkable success [44,45,46]. In the current study, A. orientalis has a distinct color preference as well, which could provide data for the development of control products for this pest.
Various factors can influence the population dynamics of pests, of which the climate and host changes take a crucial role in pest management [47,48,49]. In the current study, the population of A. orientalis around the Yuelu Mountain was strongly linked to changes in local climate and host plants and the population peak ranged from June to September. As a pantropical euryphagy pest, A. orientalis is sensitive to changes in climate and can feed on crops over 26 families [37,38]. Locally, the temperature usually rapidly increases in June and gradually declines after September, while the Solanaceae crops such as chili peppers are generally sown in April and harvested in September. Furthermore, rainfall in Hunan Province is concentrated during the summer months, resulting in a hot and humid environment that is conducive to the rapid deterioration of crops, potentially providing more suitable living space for both A. orientalis adults and larvae [50,51,52]. Food scraps or garbage generated by humans may also deteriorate under conditions of high temperature and humidity, thereby becoming a potential food source or host for A. orientalis. The above conditions might provide a suitable living environment for A. orientalis. Therefore, according to the biological characteristics we found that more targeted management strategies need to be implemented before the rapid population growth, especially before June. Meanwhile, the culling after September also needs to be phased in to minimize the population of A. orientalis the following year.

5. Conclusions

In summary, A. orientalis has been found throughout Hunan Province, owing to the “unnoticed” characteristics and powerful adaptability in the hosts and climate. Among the various infested hosts, chili peppers and tomatoes were damaged mostly. The development durations, color preferences, and morphological characteristics of A. orientalis in different stages have been described in detail, which can be used as reference data for the methods of controlling A. orientalis. Except for a few extremely cold months, A. orientalis occurs almost throughout the year, meaning that A. orientalis has extremely strong adaptability to the environment and can survive for generations under unfavorable conditions. This study provides necessary information about A. orientalis regarding its biological characteristics and Hunan distribution, with the aim of giving more attention to this pest and providing data supplements for subsequent management strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16090931/s1, Table S1. Information on fruit and vegetable sampling in different regions of Hunan Province. Table S2. Specific information about the experimental sties. Table S3. The selection of different colored sticky plates by the Atherigona orientalis. Table S4. The population dynamics of the Atherigona orientalis in the surrounding areas of Changsha City.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and Q.Z.; methodology, Z.Z., Y.L. and Q.Z.; software, Z.Z. and Y.L.; validation, Z.Z., J.Q. and Q.Z.; formal analysis, Z.Z., Y.L., S.N. and J.H.; investigation, J.H. and X.W.; resources, Z.Z.; data curation, Z.Z. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z. and Q.Z.; visualization, Z.Z.; supervision, Q.Z.; project administration, Q.Z.; funding acquisition, Q.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2023YFD1401400), the Postgraduate Joint Training Base project in Hunan Province (xjt [2021] No. 346), Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Changsha, China (kq2402158), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672094), and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST. All of the above fundings are sourced from China.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, C.; Huang, D.; Wang, Q.; Wu, J.; Wang, K. Invasions by alien plant species of the agro-pastoral ecotone in northern China: Species-specific and environmental determinants. J. Nat. Conserv. 2016, 34, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Prospero, S.; Cleary, M. Effects of Host Variability on the Spread of Invasive Forest Diseases. Forests 2017, 8, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Giunti, G.; Benelli, G.; Campolo, O.; Canale, A.; Kapranas, A.; Liedo, P.; De Meyer, M.; Nestel, D.; Ruiu, L.; Scolari, F.; et al. Management of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata: Past, present, and future. Entomol. Gen. 2023, 43, 1241–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jing, W.; Huang, C.; Li, C.-y.; Zhou, H.-x.; Ren, Y.-l.; Li, Z.-y.; Xing, L.; Zhang, B.; Qiao, X.; Liu, B.; et al. Biology, invasion and management of the agricultural invader: Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Integr. Agric. 2021, 20, 646–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mankad, A.; Kennedy, U.; Carter, L. Biological control of pests and a social model of animal welfare. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 247, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wan, F.-H.; Yang, N.-W. Invasion and Management of Agricultural Alien Insects in China. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2016, 61, 77–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sarles, L.; Verhaeghe, A.; Francis, F.; Verheggen, F.J. Semiochemicals of Rhagoletis fruit flies: Potential for integrated pest management. Crop Prot. 2015, 78, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Staton, T.; Williams, D.T. A meta-analytic investigation of the potential for plant volatiles and sex pheromones to enhance detection and management of Lepidopteran pests. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2023, 113, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qian, Q.; Cui, J.; Miao, Y.; Xu, X.; Gao, H.; Xu, H.; Lu, Z.; Zhu, P. The Plant Volatile-Sensing Mechanism of Insects and Its Utilization. Plants 2024, 13, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nath, A.; Elaiyabharathi, T.; Srinivasan, T.; Santhanakrishnan, V.P.; Sritharan, N.; Murugan, M. Food baited traps in fruit fly management: Present status and future prospects. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2025, 63, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Segura, D.F.; Belliard, S.A.; Teresa Vera, M.; Bachmann, G.E.; Josefina Ruiz, M.; Jofre-Barud, F.; Fernandez, P.C.; Liza Lopez, M.; Shelly, T.E. Plant Chemicals and the Sexual Behavior of Male Tephritid Fruit Flies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2018, 111, 239–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benelli, G.; Daane, K.M.; Canale, A.; Niu, C.-Y.; Messing, R.H.; Vargas, R.I. Sexual communication and related behaviours in Tephritidae: Current knowledge and potential applications for Integrated Pest Management. J. Pest Sci. 2014, 87, 385–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cui, Z.; Si, P.; Liu, L.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, J.-J.; Zhou, Q. Push-pull strategy for integrated control of Bactrocera minax (Diptera, Tephritidae) based on olfaction and vision. J. Appl. Entomol. 2022, 146, 1243–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pilkington, L.J.; Messelink, G.; van Lenteren, J.C.; Le Mottee, K. “Protected Biological Control”—Biological pest management in the greenhouse industry. Biol. Control 2010, 52, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Parolin, P.; Bresch, C.; Poncet, C.; Desneux, N. Functional characteristics of secondary plants for increased pest management. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2012, 58, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shelton, A.M.; Badenes-Perez, E. Concepts and applications of trap cropping in pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Suh, S.J.; Kwon, Y.J. Taxonomy of the genus Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae) from Korea. Entomol. Res. 2018, 48, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roditakis, E.; Kremi, K.; Mylona, K.; Georgousis, V.; Avtzis, D.N.; Simoglou, K.B. First report of the pepper fruit fly Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) infesting commercial pepper crops in Greece. Insects 2023, 14, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suh, S.J.; Kwon, Y.J. First finding of a quarantine pest, Atherigona (Acritochaeta) orientalis Schiner (Diptera: Muscidae), in Korea. Entomol. Res. 2016, 46, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Herawani, F.; Rauf, A.; Santoso, S. Status of infestation and biology of pepper fruit fly, Atherigona orientalis (Schiner) (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Hama Dan Penyakit Tumbuh. Trop. 2019, 19, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ogbalu, O.K. The effects of different traditional sources of nutrients on the infestation of pepper fruits by the pepper fruitfly, Atherigona orientalis (Schiner), in Nigeria. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2010, 182, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Skidmore, P. The Biology of the Muscidae of the World; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cabrera-Cánoves, P.; Pujade-Villar, J.; Pont, A.C. The first record of the pantropical filth fly Atherigona orientalis Schiner from mainland Europe and another record of Synthesiomyia nudiseta (van der Wulp) from Spain (Diptera: Muscidae). Entomol. Mon. Mag. 2019, 155, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pont, A.C. The World Distribution, Host Range and Abundance of Atherigona orientalis Schiner, 1968 (Insecta, Diptera, Muscidae); A Report Prepared for the Bureau of Rural Resources; Department of Primary Industries and Energy: Canberra, Australia, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lou, Q.Z.; Li, J.; Shang, J.C.; Cui, J.Y.; Gu, Q.; Wang, J.C.; Sun, X.X.; Zhang, J.P. First record of Atherigona orientails (Diptera: Muscidae) feeding on rotten pear fruits in Hebei Province and its morphological and molecular identification. Plant Quar. 2018, 32, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  26. Grzywacz, A.; Pape, T.; Hudson, W.G.; Gomez, S. Morphology of immature stages of Atherigona reversura (Diptera: Muscidae), with notes on the recent invasion of North America. J. Nat. Hist. 2013, 47, 1055–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xie, G.A.; Qian, W.; Fen, Y. Taxonomic study of genus Acritochaeta (Diptera: Muscidae) With description of a new species from China. J. Vector Biol. Control 2013, 24, 157–160. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mouttet, R.; Taddei, A. First record of Atherigona orientalis Schiner, 1868 (Diptera: Muscidae) in France. EPPO Bull. 2024, 54, 13022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pont, A.C. A review of the Oriental species of Atherigona Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae) of economic importance. In Controlof Sorghum Shoot Fly; Oxford & IBH Pub. Co.: New Delhi, India, 1972; pp. 27–104. [Google Scholar]
  30. Couri, S.; Araujo, D. The immature stages of Atherigona orientalis Schiner (Diptera: Muscidae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 1992, 105, 490–493. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferrar, P. A Guide to the Breeding Habits and Immature Stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha (Part 1: Text; Part 2: Figures); Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wu, S.; Tang, L.; Zhang, X.; Xing, Z.; Lei, Z.; Gao, Y. A decade of a thrips invasion in China: Lessons learned. Ecotoxicology 2018, 27, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yadav, S.K.; Bhowmik, S.; Yadav, P.C.; Sharma, K.C. Identification and control of Trogoderma granarium (Coleoptera: Dermestidae), a potential threat to stored products and international trade. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2022, 42, 999–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mugala, T.; Visser, D.; Malan, A.P.; Addison, P. Review of Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard, 1926) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on potatoes in South Africa, with special reference to biological control using entomopathogens and parasitoids. Afr. Entomol. 2022, 30, e11455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bebber, D.P.; Holmes, T.; Gurr, S.J. The global spread of crop pests and pathogens. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014, 23, 1398–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kavallieratos, N.G.; Wakil, W.; Eleftheriadou, N.; Ghazanfar, M.U.; El-Shafie, H.; Simmons, A.M.; Dimase, M.; Smith, H.A.; Chandler, D. Integrated management system of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci: A review. Entomol. Gen. 2024, 44, 1117–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, Z.; Luo, Y.; Wang, X.; He, J.; Zhou, Q. Identification and sex expression profiles of candidate chemosensory genes from Atherigona orientalis via the antennae and leg transcriptome analysis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2024, 50, 101222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ogbalu, O.K.; Manuel, R.B.B. Abscission of Pepper Fruits By Dipterous Pest, Atherigona orientalis (Schiner) In Traditional and Mono-Crop Farms in Port Harcourt, Niger Delta, Nigeria. J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 2014, 7, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cheng, P.; Song, W.; Gong, X.; Liu, Y.; Xie, W.; Huang, L.; Hong, Y. Proteomic Approaches of Trichoderma hamatum to Control Ralstonia solanacearum Causing Pepper Bacterial Wilt. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2015, 17, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Coulibaly, S.; Kamsu-Foguem, B.; Kamissoko, D.; Traore, D. Explainable deep convolutional neural networks for insect pest recognition. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 371, 133638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Preti, M.; Verheggen, F.; Angeli, S. Insect pest monitoring with camera-equipped traps: Strengths and limitations. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bohart, G.E.; Gressitt, J.L. Filth-inhabiting flies of Guam. Bernice P Bish. Mus. Bull. 1951, 204, 1–152. [Google Scholar]
  43. Grzywacz, A.; Pape, T. Larval morphology of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner) (Diptera: Muscidae)—A species of sanitary and forensic importance. Acta Trop. 2014, 137, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Y.; Andongma, A.A.; Dong, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xu, P.; Ren, X.; Krosch, M.N.; Clarke, A.R.; Niu, C. Rh6 gene modulates the visual mechanism of host utilization in fruit fly Bactrocera minax. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 1621–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, H.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Z.; Cao, S.; Wei, B.; Liu, Y.; Lienard, M.A.; Niu, C. Specific transcription factors regulate the expression of Rh6 in Bactrocera minax and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 305, 141201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, W.-Y.; Chen, Y.-P.; Yang, E.-C. Chromatic cues to trap the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. J. Insect Physiol. 2007, 53, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Haynes, K.J.; Walter, J.A. Advances in understanding the drivers of population spatial synchrony. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2022, 53, 100959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ims, R.A.; Henden, J.-A.; Killengreen, S.T. Collapsing population cycles. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kennedy, G.G.; Storer, N.P. Life systems of polyphagous arthropod pests in temporally unstable cropping systems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2000, 45, 467–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Du, J.; Fang, J.; Xu, W.; Shi, P. Analysis of dry/wet conditions using the standardized precipitation index and its potential usefulness for drought/flood monitoring in Hunan Province, China. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2013, 27, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Madeira, N.R.; Amaro, G.B.; Melo, R.A.C.; Ribeiro, C.S.C.; Reifschneider, F.J.B. Rootstock compatibility for sweet pepper hybrids production under greenhouse. Hortic. Bras. 2016, 34, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  52. Sadi, M.; Arabkoohsar, A. Techno-economic analysis of off-grid solar-driven cold storage systems for preventing the waste of agricultural products in hot and humid climates. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 124143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 16 00931 g001
Figure 1. Key morphological characteristics of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) adults: (A) side view of female A. therigona; (B) side view of male A. orientalis; (C) thorax; (D) basal pair of scutellarsetae; (E) palpi in male; (F) wing, dm: discal medial cell, and r-m: radial-medial crossvein; (G) the foreleg, mid leg, and hind leg of males; and (H) male terminalia.
Figure 1. Key morphological characteristics of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) adults: (A) side view of female A. therigona; (B) side view of male A. orientalis; (C) thorax; (D) basal pair of scutellarsetae; (E) palpi in male; (F) wing, dm: discal medial cell, and r-m: radial-medial crossvein; (G) the foreleg, mid leg, and hind leg of males; and (H) male terminalia.
Insects 16 00931 g001
Insects 16 00931 g002
Figure 2. Morphologies of eggs (A), larva (B), and puparium (C–G) of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae).
Figure 2. Morphologies of eggs (A), larva (B), and puparium (C–G) of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae).
Insects 16 00931 g002
Insects 16 00931 g003
Figure 3. Cumulative mortality curves of male and female Atherigona orientalis adults.
Figure 3. Cumulative mortality curves of male and female Atherigona orientalis adults.
Insects 16 00931 g003
Insects 16 00931 g004
Figure 4. The selection of different colored cardstocks by Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae). (A) First month; (B) second month; (C) third month; (D) total. The different letters above the bars represent the significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. The selection of different colored cardstocks by Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae). (A) First month; (B) second month; (C) third month; (D) total. The different letters above the bars represent the significant difference (p < 0.05).
Insects 16 00931 g004
Insects 16 00931 g005
Figure 5. The population dynamics of the Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in the surrounding areas of Changsha City (Survey results every 10 days) (March 2022−March 2023).
Figure 5. The population dynamics of the Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in the surrounding areas of Changsha City (Survey results every 10 days) (March 2022−March 2023).
Insects 16 00931 g005
Table 1. Occurrence of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in Hunan Province.
Table 1. Occurrence of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in Hunan Province.
FamilyHost PlantsPercentage of Flies Emerging from Host Plants
Atherigona orientalisBactrocera tauBactrocera latifronsBactrocera dorsalisBactrocera minax
SolanaceaeCapsicum annuum1392 (99.43%)3 (0.20%)5 (0.37%)--
Lycopersicon esculentum117 (100%)----
Solanum melongena72 (100%)----
CucurbitaceaeMomordica charantia694 (77.50%)201 (22.40%)-1 (0.10%)-
Luffa cylindrica163 (57.00%)123 (43.00%)---
Cucumis melo61 (76.25%)19 (23.75%)---
Cucurbita pepo11 (84.62%)2 (15.38%)---
Benincasa hispida11 (100%)----
Cucurbita moschata6 (2.64%)221 (97.36%)---
Lagenaria sciceraria3 (100%)----
Cucumis sativus-----
RosaceaeAmygdalus persica44 (100%)----
Prunus salicina-----
Prunus persica-----
Pyrus spp.1 (100%)----
RutaceaeCitrus reticulata42 (91.30%)--1 (2.20%)3 (6.50%)
ActinidiaceaeActinidia chinensis1 (100%)----
EbenaceaeDiospyros kaki3 (100%)----
MoraceaeFicus carica-----
RhamnaceaeZiziphus jujuba---3 (100%)-
Note: The numbers on the left of brackets represent the eclosion quantity of each type of fly, and the data in brackets is the percentage of the eclosion quantity of each type of fly in the total eclosion quantity of the corresponding host plant; “-” represents the absence of eclosion in the host plan.
Table 2. The development duration of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in different states.
Table 2. The development duration of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in different states.
StageNumberDevelopment Time (Days)Mean Developmental Time (Days)
Egg802–32.19 ± 0.25
Larva605–75.56 ± 0.49
Pupa506–86.16 ± 0.38
Female adult403–1511.3 ± 2.43
Male adult401–128.38 ± 1.98
Table 3. Weibull parameter values for cumulative mortality of Atherigona orientalis.
Table 3. Weibull parameter values for cumulative mortality of Atherigona orientalis.
MaleFemale
η8.485611.3475
β22.586117.6779
LT50W8.349011.1146
LT50O8.40011.200
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, Z.; Luo, Y.; Qin, J.; Wang, X.; Ning, S.; He, J.; Zhou, Q. Occurrence, Biological Characteristics, and Annual Dynamics of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in China. Insects 2025, 16, 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090931

AMA Style

Zhou Z, Luo Y, Qin J, Wang X, Ning S, He J, Zhou Q. Occurrence, Biological Characteristics, and Annual Dynamics of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in China. Insects. 2025; 16(9):931. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090931

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Zihao, Yujie Luo, Jiawei Qin, Xintong Wang, Shuaijun Ning, Jing He, and Qiong Zhou. 2025. "Occurrence, Biological Characteristics, and Annual Dynamics of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in China" Insects 16, no. 9: 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090931

APA Style

Zhou, Z., Luo, Y., Qin, J., Wang, X., Ning, S., He, J., & Zhou, Q. (2025). Occurrence, Biological Characteristics, and Annual Dynamics of Atherigona orientalis (Schiner 1968) (Diptera: Muscidae) in China. Insects, 16(9), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090931

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop