Next Article in Journal
Hermetic Storage as a Chemical-Free Alternative for Millet Preservation in Niger
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Plasticity, Waste Bioconversion, and Insect Detoxification in the Anthropocene
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Six New Species of Genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911 (Microcoryphia: Machilidae), from Southern China †

1
College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
2
Key Laboratory of Wildlife Biotechnology, Conservation and Utilization of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Zoobank Link: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:98F98919-E673-4C0A-8FE7-11CCCD2AF8BE; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7B7D8D89-1579-40FA-A1EB-04C3B6DEB877; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4C21B2F2-5BD0-4D46-BD78-7A78A941DCA0; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4D83A441-4098-4384-B529-75E5B3D303A4; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D809BC47-4BED-4B63-993D-31267071EE31; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8C07BFC0-2BB3-4053-A2AB-23B08DA13180.
Insects 2025, 16(9), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090916
Submission received: 17 July 2025 / Revised: 23 August 2025 / Accepted: 29 August 2025 / Published: 1 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)

Simple Summary

Bristletails (Microcoryphia), due to their remote habitats and cryptic lifestyles, have long remained among the least studied insect groups. Research on these insects, which retain numerous ancestral morphological traits, is of significant importance for understanding the early origins and evolutionary pathways of insects. Through the examination of specimens collected in southern China, we identified six previously undescribed species within the genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911. Utilizing dissections and high-resolution imaging under a stereomicroscope, this study provides comprehensive color documentation of various morphological structures, greatly surpassing the quality and detail of earlier records, which were largely confined to monochromatic line drawings and incomplete color images.

Abstract

Bristletails (Microcoryphia) represent a relatively understudied group of class Insecta. These wingless hexapods, which retain numerous plesiomorphic structures, remain less well understood compared to most other insect lineages. Through detailed morphological examination of specimens collected from southern China, we describe six new species (Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans sp. n. from Zhejiang; P. (V.) hezhouensis sp. n., P. (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n., and P. (V.) nanningensis sp. n. from Guangxi; and P. (V.) shenzhenensis sp. n. and P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n. from Guangdong) of subgenus Verhoeffilis Paclt, 1972. This subgenus is distinguished from other members of the Petrobiinae by several diagnostic features: paired ocelli shoe-shaped (fusiform-shaped) and submedian; two pairs of retractile vesicles on abdominal segments II–V; parameres restricted to coxite IX; penis opening small and apical; male genitalia not exceeding coxite IX; and ovipositor of primary type. The new species can be distinguished from known species and each other by the morphology of the compound eyes, maxilla, labial palps, legs, and genitalia; here, we provide detailed illustrations, tables, and descriptions. Furthermore, we sequence the COX1 gene to construct a phylogenetic tree of Microcoryphia. This contribution increases the total number of reported Pedetontus species in China to seventeen.

1. Introduction

Insects represent the most widespread and adaptable group of animals on Earth, primarily due to their well-developed wings and diverse modes of metamorphosis. However, bristletails (Microcoryphia, also referred to as Archaeognatha) differ significantly from the majority of insects: they are wingless and thus unable to fly, their juveniles and adults differ only in body size and sexual maturity, and they molt throughout their entire lives [1,2]. With cryptic habitats and lifestyles, bristletails retain numerous plesiomorphic characteristics of ancestral insects, such as monocondylous mandibles, abdominal appendages not fully reduced on each segment, and well-developed caudal filaments and cerci. As the sister group to all other extant insect lineages, bristletails hold significant value in understanding the evolutionary origins of insects [3,4]. Nevertheless, knowledge regarding bristletails remains limited compared to that of other insect groups. Many species have yet to be discovered, and numerous regions remain taxonomically unexplored or poorly understood, often described as “black holes” in entomological research [5].
The genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911, is classified under the family Machilidae, subfamily Petrobiinae, and has a distribution extending along North America, the Pacific coast of North Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia [6,7]. The genus can be distinguished from other genera based on the following characteristics: antennae scaled except for the flagellum; shoe-shaped (fusiform or dumbbell-shaped) ocelli located subinferior to the compound eyes; mandibles with four typical apical teeth; maxillary palps and all thoracic legs scaled; fore femora not swollen; meso- and metacoxae bearing styli; abdominal segments II–V or VI possessing two pairs of retractive vesicles; penis shorter than the coxite IX; parameres on coxite IX, coxite XIII without parameres; and ovipositor primary type, without fossil claw.
Pedetontus was originally established as a subgenus of Petrobius Leach, 1809, by the distinguished Italian entomologist Filippo Silvestri in 1911, who described 18 new species [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Subsequently, in 1936, Silvestri treated Pedetontus as a genus in his paper “Descripzione di alcuni Machilidae (Thysanura) della Cina”. In 1972, Pedetontus was subdivided by Paclt into two subgenera: Pedetontus sensu stricto Silvestri, 1911 (=Pedetontus s. str. = Pedetontus (P.)), and Verhoeffilis Paclt, 1972. Subgenus Pedetontus Verhoeffilis is characterized by the presence of two pairs of retractile vesicles restricted to coxites II–V and posterior angles of abdominal sternites ≤90°. In contrast, the subgenus Pedetontus s. str. possesses retractile vesicles on coxites II–VI and exhibits obtuse posterior angles of sternites [14]. Since 1960, an additional 17 species have formally been described by subsequent taxonomists [6,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The three Chinese Pedetontus species—P. (Verhoeffilis) savioi, P. (V.) bianchii, and P. (V.) fukiensis—were described by Silvestri [12]. In 1943, Silvestri described three more species: P. (V.) formosanus, P. (V.) issikii, and P. (V.) sauterii [13]. In 1965, the Japanese scholar Uchida described a new species, P. (V.) uariensis, based on specimens collected in Taiwan, China, by the Japan Lepidoptera Society [22]. In 1991, Xue & Yin described P. (V.) zhejiangensis from Tianmu Mountain [24]. In 2008, based on specimens collected in Beijing, Zhang reported the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of P. (V.) silvestrii, the type locality of which is Korea [19,26]. Two years later, the new species P. (V.) hainanensis and P. (V.) zhoui were described from Hainan and Fujian, respectively [25]. To date, a total of 11 species of Pedetontus have been documented in China, along with a cumulative count of 35 extant species of bristletails reported nationwide [9,12,13,22,24,25,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42].
Southern China is characterized by complex terrain, diverse climatic conditions, and abundant biological resources; however, research on bristletail groups remains comparatively limited. Through the dissection and morphological examination of bristletail specimens collected in southern China, this study identifies and formally describes six new species of Pedetontus and presents the first comprehensive set of detailed color photographs for the species within this genus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection and Morphological Examination

After capture, some specimens were immediately preserved in 70% ethanol for subsequent dissection and morphological examination, while the remaining individuals were reared on a diet of moss and algae. Following molting and the complete development of scales, whole-body images were captured. Specimens were dissected and observed using an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and a Novel N-117M microscope (Novel Corporation, Ningbo, China). Morphological structures were mounted on a temporary slide and imaged with an Olympus DP73 camera (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The resulting images were post-processed and assembled into figure plates using Affinity Photo 2 (Serif Ltd., Nottingham, UK, available from: https://affinity.serif.com/zh-cn/ (accessed on 12 December 2023)).

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR, DNA Sequencing, and Phylogenetic Tree

The muscle tissue dissected and isolated from the examined specimens was utilized for DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA extraction was conducted using the Ezup Column Animal Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech Company, Shanghai, China), following the manufacturer’s standard operating procedures.
This study utilized Sanger sequencing to obtain COX1 gene sequences. Following DNA extraction, the COX1 gene was amplified using universal primers LCO1490 (5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′) and HCO2198 (5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAATCA-3′) [43]. Eleven PCR products were submitted to Zhejiang Youkang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wenzhou, China) for Sanger sequencing. The concatenated maximum matrix was subjected to best-fit model selection through PartitionFinder 2.2.1 [44] in Python 2.7, which identified “GTR+I+G” as the optimal evolutionary model.
Phylogenetic construction was performed using 41 COX1 sequences, including 11 newly sequenced COX1 genes from this study and 30 Microcoryphia COX1 sequences (comprising Meinertellidae and Machilidae) downloaded from NCBI [27,36,42,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Nesomachilis australica (AY793551) from Meinertellidae served as the outgroup [52]. Detailed COX1 accession numbers are provided in Table S1. A Bayesian inference (BI) tree was constructed using MrBayes 3.2 [53] with 10 million generations of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations, sampling every 1000 generations (25% initial samples discarded as burn-in). The final phylogenetic tree was visualized and refined using ChiPlot [54] (https://www.chiplot.online, accessed on 26 June 2025).

3. Results

3.1. Taxonomy

Family Machilidae Lubbock, 1873
Subfamily Petrobiinae Kaplin 1985
Genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911
Subgenus Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) Paclt, 1972
Type species: Petrobius (Pedetontus) calcaratus (Silvestri, 1911)
Subgeneric diagnosis. Flagellum of antenna devoid of scales, maxilla and legs possess scales. Paired ocelli shoe-shaped (dumbbell-shaped), submedian, relatively close to each other. Mandibles typical, with four apical teeth. Thorax normal. Coxal stylets on midlegs and hindlegs. Forelegs of male not swollen, without sensory fields. Two pairs of retractile vesicles on the abdominal segments II–V. Paramera restricted to the IXth. Penis opening little, apical. Male genitalia not exceeding IXth coxites. Ovipositor of the primary type.
Distribution. Russia Primorskii Territory, East Asia, Southeast Asia.

3.2. Keys

  • Key to subgenre of Pedetontus worldwide
1.
Retractile vesicles restricted to coxites II–V, posterior angles of abdominal sternites ≤90°............................................................... Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) Paclt, 1972
-
Retractile vesicles on coxites II–VI, posterior angles of abdominal sternites obtuse......................................................................Pedetontus sensu stricto Silvestri, 1911
  • Key to known species of Pedetontus in China
2.
Eye length-to-width ratio > 0.9....................................................................................3
-
Eye length-to-width ratio < 0.9..................................................................................10
3.
Tarsus with transparent needle-shaped setae..........................................................4
-
Tarsus without transparent needle-shaped setae.....................................................8
4.
Ratio of distance between inner margins of paired ocelli to combined width of eyes < 0.1.....................................................P. (Verhoeffilis) silvestrii Mendes, 1991
-
Ratio of distance between inner margins of paired ocelli to combined width of eyes > 0.1........................................................................................................................5
5.
Ultimate article of maxillary palp (palp VII) longer than penultimate article (palp VI)............................................................................P. (V.) formosanus Silvestri 1943
-
Ultimate article of maxillary palp (palp VII) as long as or shorter than penultimate article (palp VII) ..................................................................................................6
6.
Labial palp of male without long hair-like setaea......P. (V.) savioi Silvestri 1936
-
Labial palp of male with long hair-like setaea ..........................................................7
7.
Parameres 1+8 articulated..............................P. (V.) zhejiangensis Xue & Yin 1991
-
Parameres 1+7 articulated................P. (V.) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n.
8.
Labial palp of male with long hair-like setae...................................................................................................................................................................................................................P. (V.) zhoui Yu, Zhang & Zhang 2010
-
Labial palp of male without long hair-like setae......................................................9
9.
Labial palp of male modified, laterally expanded.....P. (V.) issikii Silvestri 1943
-
Labial palp of male not modified, clavate................P. (V.) bianchii Silvestri 1936
10.
Ratio of distance between inner margins of paired ocelli to combined width of eyes <0.1........................................................................P. (V.) uraiensis Uchida 1965
-
Ratio of distance between inner margins of paired ocelli to combined width of eyes >0.1......................................................................................................................11
11.
Tarsus with transparent needle-shaped setae........P. (V.) fukiensis Silvestri 1936
-
Tarsus without transparent needle-shaped setae...................................................12
12.
Ovipositor exceeding stylus IX (including supporting spines)............................13
-
Ovipositor not exceeding stylus IX (including supporting spines)..................... 15
13.
Parameres 1+6 articulated................P. (V.) hainanensis Yu, Zhang & Zhang 2010
-
Parameres more than 1+6 articulated....................................................................... 14
14.
Parameres 1+7 articulated......P. (V.) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n.
-
Parameres 1+8 articulated.......P. (V.) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n.
15.
Ultimate articles of labial palps (article III) of female clavate, not modified, compound eyes yellowish green............................................................................................................................................................................................P. (V.) shenzhenensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n.
-
Ultimate articles of labial palps (article III) of female modified, expanded laterally, compound eyes brown...............................................................................................16
16.
Ultimate articles of labial palps (article III) of female with more than 30 sensory cones at its apex...................... P. (V.) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n.
-
Ultimate articles of labial palps (article III) of female without sensory cones at its apex...............................................P. (V.) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n.

3.3. Description

Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6)
Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:98F98919-E673-4C0A-8FE7-11CCCD2AF8BE
Type specimens and type locality. ♂—holotype (in 70% ethanol); 3♂4♀—paratypes (in 70% ethanol). Fengya Valley, Pan’an County, Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, China (29°04′45″ N 120°37′39″ E, 542 m), in leaf litter and on rocks near signal station (Figure 1), 17.VII.2024, coll. Jia-Yong Zhang, Chen-Yang Shen, Zhi-Qiang Guo, and Jie-Hong Ji. All type specimens deposited in the Animal Herbarium, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Figure 1. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (A) P. (V.) elegans sp. n. in situ. (B) Ditto. (C) Habitat.
Figure 1. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (A) P. (V.) elegans sp. n. in situ. (B) Ditto. (C) Habitat.
Insects 16 00916 g001
Description. Male body length 10.4–11.2 mm, female 11.9 mm. Body covered with scales, light brown, with several white longitudinal stripes, black markings, and a few green markings; caudal filament and cerci with several well-developed white annulate setae. Antennae and median caudal filament approximately 1.6 times body length. Lateral cerci length approximately two-thirds of body length (Figure 1A,B, Figure 2A, and Figure 5A).
Head. Compound eyes well-developed, strongly convex, bright yellowish-green (Figure 2D–G and Figure 5B,C). Ratios of eye length to width and contact line length to eye length given in Table 1. Paired ocelli subinferior to compound eyes, reddish-brown, dumbbell-shaped. Ratios of ocellus length to width and distance between inner margins of ocelli to combined width of eyes given in Table 1. Vertex straight, with deep chestnut markings. Frons convex, bearing fine setae, without long bristles. Genae bearing black setae. Clypeus and labrum bearing transparent long setae (Figure 2D,E and Figure 5B,C).
Figure 2. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Terminal chain of flagellum. (D) Head, frontal view. (E) Ditto, lateral view. (F,G) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. The white elongated rectangles as the scale bars. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 2. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Terminal chain of flagellum. (D) Head, frontal view. (E) Ditto, lateral view. (F,G) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. The white elongated rectangles as the scale bars. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g002
Antennae scaled except on flagellum; flagellum extremely long, with dark annulations and well-developed annulate setae; terminal chains divided into 21–22 segments. Scape length-to-width ratio 2.2–2.33 (Figure 2B).
Mandibles typical, apex with four distal teeth (Figure 3D).
Maxilla basal segment with one processus basalis and one inner protuberance (Figure 3F). Male maxillary palp articles III–VII with well-developed long brush-like setae ventrally; female with long brush-like setae only on article 2. Ultimate article of maxillary palp subequal in length to penultimate article (Figure 3E and Figure 5D,E). Maxillary palp articles V–VII bearing transparent spines dorsally (Figure 3E and Figure 5E); numbers given in Table 2.
Labial palp third article not modified, clavate, apex bearing sensory cone setae; numbers given in Table 2. Male labial palp II and III bearing long hair-like setae; female lacking these (Figure 3G,H and Figure 5F,G).
Figure 3. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (D) Mandible. (E) Maxilla. (F) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (G) Labium. (H) Labial palp. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 3. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (D) Mandible. (E) Maxilla. (F) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (G) Labium. (H) Labial palp. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g003
Thorax. Thorax normal. Foreleg femur not expanded, without sensory field; mid- and hindlegs with coxal styli. Coxae, trochanters, femora, and tibiae with long bristles ventrally; tarsi and hind tibiae bearing transparent needle-shaped setae ventrally; numbers given in Table 3. Tibiae bearing black setae dorsally. Pretarsal claw structure normal (Figure 3A–C and Figure 6A–D).
Figure 4. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Penis and parameres. (K) Caudal filament and cerci. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 4. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Penis and parameres. (K) Caudal filament and cerci. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g004
Abdomen. Abdominal coxites I, VI, and VII with one pair of retractile vesicles; coxites II–V with two pairs of retractile vesicles (Figure 4A–G and Figure 6E,F). Female coxite VII with inner lobes fused and extending posteriorly (Figure 6F). Angles of posterior angles of abdominal sternites given in Table 4. Ratios of styli length to coxites length on abdominal segment V, styli length to supporting spines length, and basal width to length of sternites given in Table 5. Coxite IX with 2–4+2–4 transparent macrochaetae internally (Figure 4I and Figure 6H). Caudal filament laterally and cerci internally bearing deciduous long setae and supporting spines (Figure 4K).
Figure 5. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head, frontal view. (C) Ditto, lateral view. (D) Maxilla. (E) Maxillary palp articles V–VII. (F) Labium. (G) Labium palp. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 5. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head, frontal view. (C) Ditto, lateral view. (D) Maxilla. (E) Maxillary palp articles V–VII. (F) Labium. (G) Labium palp. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g005
Coxite VIII without parameres. Coxite IX with penis and parameres (Figure 4I,J). Penis bearing black setae, opening apically, surpassing parameres; parameres 1+7 segmented (Figure 4J). Ovipositor of primary type, surpassing styli (including supporting spines) of coxite IX (Figure 6G,H). Number of segments of anterior gonapophyses and posterior gonapophyses given in Table 6.
Figure 6. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (D) Foreleg tarsus. (E–H) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 6. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (D) Foreleg tarsus. (E–H) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g006
Differential diagnosis. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans sp. n. is most striking due to its extremely large compound eyes and the well-developed ultimate article of the maxillary palp—subequal in length to the penultimate article. P. (V.) formosanus Silvestri, 1943, which also has large eyes and slender maxillary palps; they are morphologically the closest species, but the two can be distinguished by the shape of the lateral ocelli and the length of the article IV of maxillary palp. When viewed laterally from the front, the lateral ocelli of P. (V.) elegans sp. n. are constricted medially, presenting a dumbbell shape, whereas those of P. (V.) formosanus are almost clavate. The maxillary palp IV of P. (V.) elegans sp. n. is subequal in length to palp V, while that of P. (V.) formosanus is distinctly shorter than the palp V. P. (V.) diversicornis Silvestri, 1943, is also similar to P. (V.) elegans sp. n. Key distinguishing characters are antennae and penis length: the former has antennae shorter than the body and a penis subequal in length to the parameres, while the latter has antennae much longer than the body and a penis longer than the parameres.
Etymology. The specific epithet “elegans” (Latin adjective meaning “slender” or “graceful”) refers to the species’ slender antennae, elegant markings, and fascinating green eyes. The Chinese name for P. (V.) elegans sp. n. is 秀丽跳蛃.
Distribution. Zhejiang Province, China.
Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12)
Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7B7D8D89-1579-40FA-A1EB-04C3B6DEB877
Type Specimens and Type Locality. Holotype, 1♀ (in 70% ethanol), paratypes: 1♂6♀ (in 70% ethanol), Huangyao Town, Hezhou City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China (24°14′ N 111°13 E), 18.XII.2024, collected by Jia-Yong Zhang. All type specimens deposited in the Animal Herbarium, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Figure 7. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (AC) Dorsal, lateral, and anterolateral view.
Figure 7. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (AC) Dorsal, lateral, and anterolateral view.
Insects 16 00916 g007
Description. Male body length 7.9 mm, female 7.6–8.9 mm. Body covered with grayish-green scales; posterior part of mesonotum with a dark arched marking; tergites of subsequent segments bearing variously sized paired black spots. Caudal filament and cerci with white annulations. Antennae slightly longer than body length; caudal filament nearly 1.5 times body length; cerci longer than half of body length (Figure 7A,B).
Head. Compound eyes small, smooth, dark-colored, with indistinct yellow markings internally (Figure 7C, Figure 8C–F and Figure 11B,C); ratios of eye length to width and contact line length to eye length given in Table 1. Paired ocelli subinferior to compound eyes, black (fading to dark gray when preserved in 70% ethanol), with white borders, shoe-shaped. Ratios of ocellus length to width and distance between inner margins of ocelli to combined width of eyes given in Table 1. Vertex without markings. Frons smooth, with long transparent bristles, covered with scales. Genae without setae. Clypeus and labrum with transparent bristles (Figure 8C–E and Figure 11B,C).
Antennae scaled except on flagellum; flagellum without annulations, bearing well-developed annulate setae; terminal chain divided into 10–13 segments. Scape length-to-width ratio 1.73–1.84 (Figure 8B).
Mandibles typical, apex with four distal teeth (Figure 9D).
Figure 8. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (D) Ditto, lateral view. (E,F) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 8. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (D) Ditto, lateral view. (E,F) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g008
Maxillary palp I with one processus basalis and one inner protuberance (Figure 9E,F and Figure 11E). Male maxillary palp articles II–VII with well-developed short brush-like setae ventrally; female without. Ratio of ultimate article to penultimate article length 0.57–0.62 (Figure 9E and Figure 11E,F). Dorsal surface of maxillary palp articles V–VII with transparent spines (Figure 9E and Figure 11E,F); numbers given in Table 2.
Male labial palp yellow, third segment modified, laterally expanded, apex with sensory cones; numbers given in Table 2; ultimate article of female less swollen, clavate. Labial palp without long hair-like setae (Figure 9G,H and Figure 11G,H).
Hypopharynx structure typical (Figure 9I).
Thorax. Thorax normal. Foreleg femur not expanded, without sensory field; mid- and hind legs with coxal styli. Ventral surface of legs with long bristles, without needle-shaped setae. Pretarsal claw structure normal (Figure 9A–C and Figure 12A–C).
Figure 9. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (AC) Foreleg, midleg and hindleg. (D) Mandible. (E) Maxilla. (F) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (G) Labium. (H) Labial palp. (I) Hypopharynx. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 9. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (AC) Foreleg, midleg and hindleg. (D) Mandible. (E) Maxilla. (F) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (G) Labium. (H) Labial palp. (I) Hypopharynx. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g009
Abdomen. Abdominal coxites I, VI, and VII with one pair of retractile vesicles; coxites II–V with two pairs of retractile vesicles (Figure 10A–G and Figure 12D,E); inner lobes of female coxite VII fused and posteriorly extended (Figure 10G). Ratios of styli length to coxites length on abdominal segment V, styli length to supporting spines length, and basal width to length of sternites given in Table 5. Coxite IX medially with 4–8+4–8 transparent macrochaetae (Figure 10I and Figure 12G). Caudal filament laterally and cerci medially with deciduous long hairs and supporting spines (Figure 10J).
Figure 10. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Caudal filament and cerci. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 10. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Caudal filament and cerci. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g010
Coxite VIII without parameres, coxite IX with penis and parameres (Figure 12F,G). Penis opening apically, slightly shorter than parameres; parameres 1+8 segmented (Figure 10H). Ovipositor of primary type, surpassing styli (including supporting spines) of coxite IX (Figure 10H,I). Number of segments of anterior gonapophyses and posterior gonapophyses given in Table 6.
Figure 11. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head, frontal view. (C) Ditto, lateral view. (D) Mandible. (E) Maxilla. (F) Maxillary palp articles V–VII. (G) Labium. (H) Labium palp. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 11. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head, frontal view. (C) Ditto, lateral view. (D) Mandible. (E) Maxilla. (F) Maxillary palp articles V–VII. (G) Labium. (H) Labium palp. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g011
Figure 12. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, male. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (DG) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. (H) Penis and parameres. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 12. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, male. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (DG) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. (H) Penis and parameres. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g012
Differential diagnosis. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis sp. n. is morphologically most similar to P. (V.) sauterii Silvestri, 1943, from Taiwan, China. They differ primarily in the length of the contact line of the eyes: in the former, the ratio of this structure’s length to the length of the eye is <0.4, while in the latter, it is >0.4.
Etymology. The species is named after its type locality, Hezhou City. The Chinese name for P. (Verhoeffilis) hezhouensis sp. n. is 贺州跳蛃.
Distribution. Hezhou City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16, Figure 17 and Figure 18)
Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4C21B2F2-5BD0-4D46-BD78-7A78A941DCA0
Type Specimens and Type Locality. Holotype, 1♂ (in 70% ethanol), paratypes: 15♂2♀ (in 70% ethanol), China, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Jinxiu County, Dayao Mountain (24°6′4.88″ N, 110°9′37.69″ E, 947 m), 1.V.2023, collected by Wen-Yong Feng. All type specimens deposited in the Animal Herbarium, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Figure 13. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (A–C) Lateral, dorsal, and anterior view.
Figure 13. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (A–C) Lateral, dorsal, and anterior view.
Insects 16 00916 g013
Description. Male body length 11.2 mm, female 9.7 mm. Body covered with dark brown scales; mesonotum with an arched dark marking; subsequent nota bearing paired dark patches; abdominal nota patterned with three longitudinal pale diamond-shaped markings. Antennae equal to or slightly longer than body length; caudal filament nearly 1.5 times body length; cerci about half as long as body length (Figure 13A,B).
Figure 14. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (D) Ditto, lateral view. (E,F) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 14. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (D) Ditto, lateral view. (E,F) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g014
Head. Compound eyes smooth, deep reddish-brown, with indistinct yellow blotches (Figure 14C–F and Figure 17B,C); ratios of eye length to width and contact line length to eye length given in Table 1. Ocelli dark brown with white borders, dumbbell-shaped. Ratios of ocellus length to width and distance between inner margins of ocelli to combined width of eyes given in Table 1. Vertex without markings. Frons convex, with long transparent bristles, scaled. Genae without setae. Clypeus and labrum with transparent bristles (Figure 14C–F and Figure 17B,C).
Figure 15. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (D) Mandible. (E) Maxilla. (F) Maxillary palp article VI and VII. (G) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (H) Labium. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 15. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (D) Mandible. (E) Maxilla. (F) Maxillary palp article VI and VII. (G) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (H) Labium. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g015
Antennae scaled except on flagellum; flagellum with pale annulations, bearing well-developed annulate setae; terminal chain divided into 8–10 segments. Scape length-to-width ratio 1.86–1.91 (Figure 14B).
Mandibles typical, apex with four distal teeth (Figure 15D).
Maxillary palp I with one processus basalis and one inner protuberance (Figure 15E,G and Figure 17D). Male maxillary palp articles II–VII with well-developed short brush-like setae ventrally; female without. Ratio of ultimate article to penultimate article length 0.69–0.85. Dorsal surface of maxillary palp articles V–VII with transparent spines (Figure 15E,F and Figure 17D); numbers given in Table 2.
Labial palp third segment modified, extremely laterally expanded, apex with sensory cones; numbers given in Table 2; ultimate article of female less swollen, apex without sensory cones. Labial palp without long hair-like setae (Figure 15H and Figure 17F,G).
Hypopharynx structure typical (Figure 17E).
Thorax. Thorax normal. Foreleg femur not expanded, without sensory field; mid- and hind legs with coxal styli, apex of coxal styli yellow. Ventral surface of legs with long bristles, without needle-shaped setae. Pretarsal claw structure normal (Figure 15A–C and Figure 18A–C).
Figure 16. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Penis and parameres. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 16. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Penis and parameres. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g016
Abdomen. Abdominal coxites I, VI, and VII with one pair of retractile vesicles; coxites II–V with two pairs of retractile vesicles; coxites I–IX each with a pair of yellow styli (Figure 16A–I and Figure 18D–G); inner lobes of female coxite VII fused and posteriorly extended (Figure 18E). Ratios of styli length to coxites length on abdominal segment V, styli length to supporting spines length, and basal width to length of sternites given in Table 5. Coxite IX medially with 3–4+3–4 transparent macrochaetae (Figure 16I and Figure 18G). Caudal filament laterally and cerci medially with deciduous long hairs and supporting spines (Figure 13B and Figure 14A).
Figure 17. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head, frontal view. (C) Ditto, lateral view. (D) Maxilla. (E) Hypophraynx. (F) Labium. (G) Labium palp. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 17. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head, frontal view. (C) Ditto, lateral view. (D) Maxilla. (E) Hypophraynx. (F) Labium. (G) Labium palp. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g017
Coxite VIII without parameres. Coxite IX with penis and parameres (Figure 16I,J). Penis opening apically, slightly shorter than parameres; parameres 1+7 segmented (Figure 16J). Ovipositor of primary type, surpassing styli (including supporting spines) of coxite IX (Figure 18G). Number of segments of anterior gonapophyses and posterior gonapophyses given in Table 6.
Figure 18. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (DG) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 18. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (DG) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g018
Differential diagnosis. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis sp. n. is morphologically very similar to P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n. from Zhaoqing, Guangdong Province, but can be distinguished by the form of the labial palps: the former has a highly modified ultimate article (width significantly greater than length), with the anterolateral part of article I in males also laterally expanded. Additionally, the apex of the female ultimate article lacks sensory cones—an extremely rare feature. In contrast, although the labial palps of P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n. are also swollen, they are far less modified than in P. (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n.; article I lacks specialization, and both sexes possess sensory cones at the apex of the ultimate article.
Etymology. The species is named after its type locality, Jinxiu County. The Chinese name for P. (V.) jinxiuensis is 金秀跳蛃.
Distribution. Jinxiu County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (Figure 19, Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22, Figure 23 and Figure 24)
Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:4D83A441-4098-4384-B529-75E5B3D303A4
Type Specimens and Type Locality. Holotype, 1♂ (in 70% ethanol), paratypes: 4♂ 6♀ (in 70% ethanol), collected from Jiangnan District, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, 18 II.2025, by Jia-Yong Zhang. All type specimens deposited in the Animal Herbarium, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Figure 19. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (AC) Dorsal, anterolateral and lateral view.
Figure 19. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (AC) Dorsal, anterolateral and lateral view.
Insects 16 00916 g019
Description. Male body length 10.6 mm, female 11.6 mm. Body covered with grayish-green scales. Antennae slightly shorter than body length; caudal filament slightly longer than body length; cerci about three-quarters as long as body length (Figure 19A,C).
Figure 20. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (D) Ditto, lateral view. (E,F) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 20. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (D) Ditto, lateral view. (E,F) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g020
Head. Compound eyes smooth, black, without markings (Figure 19B, Figure 20C–F and Figure 23C); ratios of eye length to width and contact line length to eye length given in Table 1. Ocelli dark brown with white borders, dumbbell-shaped. Ratios of ocellus length to width and distance between inner margins of ocelli to combined width of eyes given in Table 1. Vertex without markings. Frons convex, with long transparent bristles, scaled. Genae without bristles. Clypeus and labrum with transparent bristles (Figure 20C–F and Figure 23C).
Figure 21. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Mandible (B) Labium. (C) Labial palp (D) Maxilla. (E) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (F) Hypopharynx. (GI) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 21. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Mandible (B) Labium. (C) Labial palp (D) Maxilla. (E) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (F) Hypopharynx. (GI) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g021
Antennae scaled except on flagellum; flagellum almost without dark annulations, bearing well-developed annulate setae; terminal chain divided into 14 segments. Scape length-to-width ratio 1.97–2.11 (Figure 20B and Figure 23B).
Mandibles typical, apex with four distal teeth (Figure 21A).
Maxillary palp I with one processus basalis and one inner protuberance (Figure 21D,E and Figure 24C). Maxillary palp articles without short brush-like setae ventrally. Ratio of ultimate article to penultimate article length 0.45–0.52. Dorsal surface of maxillary palp articles V–VII with transparent spines (Figure 21D and Figure 24C); numbers given in Table 2.
Hypopharynx structure typical (Figure 21F).
Male labial palp third segment modified, laterally expanded, apex with sensory cones; numbers given in Table 2; ultimate article of female almost unswollen, clavate. Labial palp without long hair-like setae (Figure 21B,C and Figure 24A,B).
Thorax. Thorax normal. Foreleg without sensory field or coxal styli; mid- and hind legs with coxal styli. Ventral surface of legs with long bristles, without needle-shaped setae. Pretarsal claw structure normal (Figure 21G–I and Figure 23D–F).
Figure 22. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Caudal filament and cerci. (K) Penis and parameres. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 22. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Caudal filament and cerci. (K) Penis and parameres. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g022
Abdomen. Abdominal coxites I, VI, and VII with one pair of retractile vesicles; coxites II–V with two pairs of retractile vesicles (Figure 22A–G and Figure 24D,E); inner lobes of female coxite VII fused and posteriorly extended (Figure 24E). Ratios of styli length to coxites length on abdominal segment V, styli length to supporting spines length, and basal width to length of sternites given in Table 5. Coxite IX medially with 6+6 transparent macrochaetae (Figure 22I and Figure 24G). Caudal filament laterally and cerci medially with deciduous long hairs and supporting spines (Figure 22J).
Figure 23. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (DF) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 23. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (DF) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g023
Coxite VIII without parameres. Coxite IX with penis and parameres (Figure 22H,I). Penis opening apically, slightly shorter than parameres; parameres 1+7 segmented (Figure 22K). Ovipositor of primary type, narrowly exceeding styli (including supporting spines) of coxite IX (Figure 24F,G). Number of segments of anterior gonapophyses and posterior gonapophyses given in Table 6.
Figure 24. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Labium. (B) Labial palp. (C) Maxilla. (DG) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 24. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Labium. (B) Labial palp. (C) Maxilla. (DG) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g024
Differential diagnosis. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) nanningensis sp. n. is morphologically most similar to P. (V.) gershneri Allen, 1995, from Arkansas, USA. They can be distinguished by the maxillary palps: the former lacks brush-like setae ventrally on the male maxillary palps, whereas the latter possesses brush-like setae ventrally on articles V–VII. Additionally, the ultimate article of the maxillary palp in P. (V.) nanningensis sp. n. is only half the length of the penultimate article, while in P. (V.) gershneri it exceeds three-quarters the length of the penultimate article.
Etymology. The species is named after its type locality, Nanning City. The Chinese name for P. (V.) nanningensis sp. n. is 南宁跳蛃.
Distribution. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Pedetontus shenzhenensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (Figure 25, Figure 26 and Figure 27)
Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D809BC47-4BED-4B63-993D-31267071EE31
Type Specimens and Type Locality. Holotype, 1♀ (in 70% ethanol), paratype, 1♀ collected from Yangtai Mountain, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China (22°39′57″ N 113°58′29″ E, 129 m), 3.IV.2023, by Yong-Ying Ruan All type specimens deposited in the Animal Herbarium, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Figure 25. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) shenzhenensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (D) Ditto, lateral view. (E,F) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. (G) Excrement. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 25. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) shenzhenensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Antenna. (C) Head, frontal view. (D) Ditto, lateral view. (E,F) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. (G) Excrement. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g025
Description. Female 11.2 mm. Body covered with brown scales (in 70% ethanol). Antennae longer than body length; caudal filament approximately 1.5 times body length; cerci slightly shorter than body length (Figure 25A).
Head. Compound eyes smooth, yellowish-green with maroon borders (Figure 25C–F); ratios of eye length to width and contact line length to eye length given in Table 1. Ocelli dark brown with white borders, dumbbell-shaped. Ratios of ocellus length to width and distance between inner margins of ocelli to combined width of eyes given in Table 1. Vertex without markings, bearing minute black setae arranged longitudinally. Frons convex, with long transparent bristles and minute black setae, scaled. Genae with black setae near compound eyes. Clypeus and labrum with transparent setae (Figure 25C–F).
Figure 26. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) shenzhenensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (A) Mandible. (B) Labium. (C) Labial palp. (D) Maxilla. (E) Maxillary palp article VI and VII. (F) Lacinia and galea. (G) Maxillary inner protuberance. (G) Labium. (HJ) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (KM) Foreclaw, midclaw, and hindclaw. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 26. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) shenzhenensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (A) Mandible. (B) Labium. (C) Labial palp. (D) Maxilla. (E) Maxillary palp article VI and VII. (F) Lacinia and galea. (G) Maxillary inner protuberance. (G) Labium. (HJ) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (KM) Foreclaw, midclaw, and hindclaw. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g026
Antennae scaled except on flagellum; flagellum with distinct pale annulations, bearing well-developed annulate setae; terminal chain divided into 10 segments. Scape length-to-width ratio 1.90 (Figure 25B).
Mandibles typical, apex with four distal teeth (Figure 26A).
Maxillary palp I with one processus basalis and one inner protuberance (Figure 26D,G). Maxillary palp articles without short brush-like setae ventrally. Ratio of ultimate article to penultimate article length 0.62. Dorsal surface of maxillary palp articles V–VII with transparent spines (Figure 26D,E); numbers given in Table 2.
Labial palp third segment slightly swollen apically, with sensory cones; numbers given in Table 2. Labial palp without long hair-like setae (Figure 26B,C).
Figure 27. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) shenzhenensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Caudal filament and cerci. (K) Apex of anterior gonapophyses. (L) Apex of posterior gonapophyses. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 27. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) shenzhenensis Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, female. (AI) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Caudal filament and cerci. (K) Apex of anterior gonapophyses. (L) Apex of posterior gonapophyses. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g027
Thorax. Thorax normal. Foreleg without sensory field or coxal styli; mid- and hind legs with coxal styli. Ventral surface of legs with long bristles, without needle-shaped setae. Pretarsal claw structure normal (Figure 26H–M).
Abdomen. Abdominal coxites I, VI, and VII with one pair of retractile vesicles; coxites II–V with two pairs of retractile vesicles (Figure 27A–G); inner lobes of female coxite VII fused and posteriorly extended (Figure 27G). Ratios of styli length to coxites length on abdominal segment V, styli length to supporting spines length, and basal width to length of sternites given in Table 5. Coxite IX medially with 4–5+4–5 transparent macrochaetae (Figure 27I). Caudal filament laterally and cerci medially with deciduous long hairs and supporting spines (Figure 27J).
Ovipositor of primary type, slightly shorter than styli (including supporting spines) of coxite IX (Figure 27H,I). Number of segments of anterior gonapophyses and posterior gonapophyses given in Table 6.
Differential Diagnosis. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) shenzhenensis sp. n. is morphologically closest to P. (V.) bianchii Silvestri, 1936, from Hong Kong. The abdominal segment IX provides a key distinction: in P. (V.) shenzhengensis sp. n., the styli (including supporting spines) of coxite IX are longer than coxite IX itself, while the posterior gonapophyses are slightly shorter than these styli. Conversely, in P. (V.) bianchii, the styli (including supporting spines) of coxite IX are shorter than coxite IX, and the posterior gonapophyses exceed their length. Additionally, the scape of P. (V.) shenzhenensis sp. n. is slender than that of P. (V.) bianchii, with length-to-width ratios of 1.90 and 1.42, respectively.
Etymology. The species is named after its type locality, Shenzhen City. The Chinese name for P. (V.) shenzhenensis sp. n. is 深圳跳蛃.
Distribution. Guangdong Province, China.
Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (Figure 28, Figure 29, Figure 30, Figure 31, Figure 32 and Figure 33)
Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8C07BFC0-2BB3-4053-A2AB-23B08DA13180
Type Specimens and Type Locality. Holotype, 1♂ (in 70% ethanol), paratypes: 11♂7♀ (in 70% ethanol), China, Guangdong Province, Zhaoqing City, Duanzhou District, Beiling Mountain Forest Park (23°09′ N 112°30′ E), from rocks along a stream, 20.XI.2024–3.I.2025, collected by Han-sheng Ou. All type specimens deposited in the Animal Herbarium, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Figure 28. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (A) The captured P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n., arrow indicates a mite. (B) Ditto. (C) In situ. (D) Habitat.
Figure 28. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n. (A) The captured P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n., arrow indicates a mite. (B) Ditto. (C) In situ. (D) Habitat.
Insects 16 00916 g028
Description. Male body length 10.2 mm, female 9.2 mm. Body covered with dark brown scales; nota with a pale longitudinal stripe extending from the pronotum to the base of the caudal filament, terminating in two large and one small diamond-shaped markings. Antennae slightly shorter than body length; caudal filament slightly longer than body length; cerci about half as long as body length (Figure 28A–C, Figure 29A and Figure 32A).
Figure 29. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view, arrow indicates a mite attached to the maxilla. (B) Antenna. (C) Terminal chain of flagellum. (D) Head, frontal view. (E) Ditto, lateral view. (F,G) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 29. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Habitus, lateral view, arrow indicates a mite attached to the maxilla. (B) Antenna. (C) Terminal chain of flagellum. (D) Head, frontal view. (E) Ditto, lateral view. (F,G) Compound eyes and paired ocelli. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g029
Head. Compound eyes smooth, dark brown, with a large bright yellow blotch internally and a smaller one inferiorly (Figure 29D–G and Figure 32B); ratios of eye length to width and contact line length to eye length given in Table 1. Ocelli dark brown, dumbbell-shaped. Ratios of ocellus length to width and distance between inner margins of ocelli to combined width of eyes given in Table 1. Vertex without markings or setae. Frons convex, with long transparent bristles, scaled. Genae without markings or setae. Clypeus and labrum with transparent setae (Figure 29D–G and Figure 32B).
Figure 30. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Mandible. (B) Labium. (C) Labial palp. (D) Maxilla. (E) Maxillary palp articles V–VII. (F) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (GI) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 30. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A) Mandible. (B) Labium. (C) Labial palp. (D) Maxilla. (E) Maxillary palp articles V–VII. (F) Maxillary inner protuberance, as indicates by the arrow. (GI) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g030
Antennae scaled except on flagellum; flagellum with distinct pale annulations, bearing well-developed annulate setae; terminal chain divided into 11–12 segments. Scape length-to-width ratio 1.74–1.91 (Figure 29B).
Mandibles typical, apex with four distal teeth (Figure 30A).
Maxillary palp I with one processus basalis and one inner protuberance (Figure 30D,F and Figure 32E). Maxillary palp articles II–VII with brush-like setae ventrally, setae on articles IV–V longer than others. Ratio of ultimate article to penultimate article length 0.45–0.52. Dorsal surface of maxillary palp articles V–VII with transparent spines (Figure 30D and Figure 32E); numbers given in Table 2.
Male labial palp third segment modified, laterally expanded, apex with sensory cones; numbers given in Table 2; ultimate article of female almost unswollen, clavate. Labial palp without long hair-like setae (Figure 30B,C and Figure 32D).
Thorax. Thorax normal. Foreleg without sensory field or coxal styli; mid- and hind legs with coxal styli, apex of coxal styli bright yellow. Ventral surface of legs with long bristles, without needle-shaped setae. Pretarsal claw structure normal (Figure 30G–I and Figure 33A–C).
Figure 31. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A–I) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Caudal filament and cerci. (K) Penis and paramere. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 31. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., holotype, male. (A–I) Abdominal sternites and coxites I–IX. (J) Caudal filament and cerci. (K) Penis and paramere. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g031
Abdomen. Abdominal coxites I, VI, and VII with one pair of retractile vesicles; coxites II–V with two pairs of retractile vesicles; coxites I–IX each with a pair of yellow styli (Figure 31A–I and Figure 33D–G); inner lobes of female coxite VII fused and posteriorly extended (Figure 33E). Ratios of styli length to coxites length on abdominal segment V, styli length to supporting spines length, and basal width to length of sternites given in Table 5. Coxite IX medially with 4–5+4–5 transparent macrochaetae (Figure 31I and Figure 33G). Caudal filament laterally and cerci medially with deciduous long hairs and supporting spines (Figure 31J).
Figure 32. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head, frontal view. (C) Labium. (D) Labial palp. (E) Maxilla. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 32. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (A) Habitus, lateral view. (B) Head, frontal view. (C) Labium. (D) Labial palp. (E) Maxilla. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g032
Coxite VIII without parameres. Coxite IX with penis and parameres (Figure 31I,K). Penis opening apically, shorter than parameres; parameres 1+7 segmented (Figure 31K). Ovipositor of primary type, not exceeding styli (including supporting spines) of coxite IX (Figure 33F,G). Number of segments of anterior gonapophyses and posterior gonapophyses given in Table 6.
Figure 33. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (D–G) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. (H) Apex of anterior gonapophyses. (I) Apex of posterior gonapophyses. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 33. Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) xanthospilus Shen, Yang, Ji & Zhang sp. n., paratype, female. (AC) Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg. (D–G) Abdominal sternites and coxites V, VII–IX. (H) Apex of anterior gonapophyses. (I) Apex of posterior gonapophyses. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Insects 16 00916 g033
Differential Diagnosis. See corresponding section of Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) jinxiuensis sp. n.
Etymology. The specific epithet “xanthospilus” is a Latinized adjective derived from Greek xanthos (ξανθός), meaning “yellow”, and Greek spilos (σπίλος), meaning “blotch” or “stain”. It refers to the species’ conspicuous yellow blotches on the compound eyes, a defining diagnostic trait that distinguishes this taxon from congeners. The Chinese name for P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n. is 黄斑跳蛃.
Distribution. Guangdong Province, China.

3.4. Phylogenetic Tree of Machilidae Based on COX1

Based on the phylogenetic tree (Figure 34), Machilinae is a paraphyletic group. Also, the monophyly of Petrobiinae is refuted by the inclusion of Petrobius brevistylis within Machilinae, but the monophyly of the Pedetontus group is supported (Pedetontus+Pedetontinus). Within the genus Pedetontus, P. (V.) nanningensis sp. n. occupies the basal position, P. (V.) elegans sp. n. and P. (V.) zhejiangensis form a sister clade, while P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n. and P. (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n. constitute another sister clade.

4. Discussion

Based on morphological observations and COX1 gene analysis, this study reports six new species of the genus Pedetontus from southern China: P. (V.) elegans sp. n. from Zhejiang Province; P. (V.) shenzhenensis sp. n. and P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n. from Guangdong Province; and P. (V.) nanningensis sp. n., P. (V.) hezhouensis sp. n., and P. (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n. from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. All these species belong to the subgenus Verhoeffilis, which is characterized by the presence of two pairs of retractile vesicles restricted to coxites II–V and posterior angles of abdominal sternites ≤90°. P. (V.) elegans sp. n. and P. (V.) zhejiangensis form a sister clade; both species originate from Zhejiang Province and share some morphological similarities, but they can be distinguished by a few characteristics. The compound eyes of P. (V.) zhejiangensis are reddish-brown, while those of P. elegans sp. n. are yellowish-green. P. (V.) zhejiangensis lacks stout setae on the frons, whereas P. (V.) elegans sp. n. possesses well-developed stout setae. The male labial palps of P. (V.) zhejiangensis bear a few long filamentous setae laterally, which are absent in P. (V.) elegans sp. n. The ultimate segment of the maxillary palps is distinctly shorter than the penultimate segment in P. (V.) zhejiangensis, whereas in P. (V.) elegans sp. n., the ultimate and penultimate segments are equal in length. The parameres of P. (V.) zhejiangensis exhibit 1+8 segmentation, and the penis is shorter than the parameres; in contrast, P. (V.) elegans sp. n. has 1+7 segmented parameres, and the penis is longer than the parameres.
The subgenus Verhoeffilis is believed to have originated in the southeastern Palaearctic Realm. Its northeastward migration led to the emergence of the American s. stricto subgenus, whereas its southward dispersal resulted in the current Indo-Malayan Pedetontus species [6]. Southern China is situated at the transitional zone between the Palaearctic and Oriental Realms. Among the new species described, P. (V.) elegans sp. n. (Zhejiang) exhibits morphological traits most consistent with the Palaearctic fauna: compound eyes longer than wide; ventral surfaces of thoracic legs bearing subspine-form setae. In contrast, the remaining five species (from Guangdong and Guangxi) possess compound eyes that are wider than long and lack subspine-form setae on thoracic legs. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that P. (V.) elegans sp. n. is closely related to the Palaearctic species P. silvestrii.
P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n. and P. (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n. form sister clades on the phylogenetic tree and exhibit morphological similarities. However, the genetic distance based on COX1 sequences and differences in the labial palps provide evidence that they represent distinct species. These observations suggest the subgenus is undergoing a process of divergence.
Petrobius brevistylis is clustered within the Allopsontus group—an unexpected placement that highlights its taxonomic distinctness. This is consistent with its possession of non-segmented parameres and a penis that is significantly longer than the coxite IX, in contrast to most Petrobiinae species, which typically exhibit segmented parameres and a penis shorter than the coxite IX [55]. The genus Allopsontus appears to be non-monophyletic according to the phylogenetic tree, potentially due to the presence of seven morphologically distinct subgenera distributed across Northwest China, Central Asia, Mongolia, and the southern Himalayas. Key morphological differences include variations in ocellar shape/position, the number of coxal vesicles, and penis morphology [56], suggesting a lack of monophyly that warrants further investigation through molecular and detailed morphological study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16090916/s1, Table S1: Information about samples used in this study and their NCBI GenBank accession numbers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-Y.S., T.Y. and J.-Y.Z.; methodology, C.-Y.S. and J.-Y.Z.; software, C.-Y.S. and T.Y.; validation, C.-Y.S. and J.-Y.Z.; formal analysis, C.-Y.S., T.Y. and J.-Y.Z.; investigation, C.-Y.S., J.-H.J. and J.-Y.Z.; resources, C.-Y.S., J.-H.J. and J.-Y.Z.; data curation, C.-Y.S. and T.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-Y.S. and T.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.-Y.S., T.Y., J.-H.J. and J.-Y.Z.; visualization, C.-Y.S. and T.Y.; supervision, J.-Y.Z.; project administration, J.-Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY23C040002) and by the Natural Science Foundation of China (32470475).

Data Availability Statement

Supporting data for this study are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) (accessed on 10 June 2025). For GenBank numbers, see Figure 34 and Table S1.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply in debt to Zhi-Qiang Guo, Yong-Ying Ruan, Han-Sheng Qu, Wen-Yong Feng, and the Institute of Zoology of the Guangdong Academy of Sciences for their assistance in sample collection during this study. Additionally, the authors express their gratitude to Hui-Yuan Wu for assistance in constructing the phylogenetic trees. Finally, special thanks are extended to Shodo Mtow of Meijo University, and Vladimir Kaplin of All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection for generously providing the literature, which significantly facilitated our study on the genus Pedetontus and other bristletail species.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bach de Roca, C.; Baltanas, R.M.; Gaju Ricart, M. Orden Microcoryphia. Ibero Divers. Entomológica 2015, 38, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sturm, H.; Machida, R. Archaeognatha. In Handbook of Zoology; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2001; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yanoviak, S.P.; Kaspari, M.; Dudley, R. Gliding Hexapods and the Origins of Insect Aerial Behaviour. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5, 510–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grimaldi, D.A.; Engel, M.S. Evolution of the Insects; Repr.; Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; ISBN 978-0-521-82149-0. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mendes, L.F. Taxonomy of Zygentoma and Microcoryphia: Historical Overview, Present Status and Goals for the New Millennium. Pedobiologia 2002, 46, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaplin, V.G. A New Species of the Bristletail Genus Pedetontus Silv. (Thysanura, Machilidae) from Thailand. Entmol. Rev. 2013, 93, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mendes, L.F. An Annotated List of Generic and Specific Names of Machilidae (Microcoryphia, Insecta) with Identification Keys for the Genera and Geographical Notes; Ministerio do Planeamento e da Administração do: Lisbon, Portugal; Território, Secretaria de Estado da Ciência e Tecnologia: Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical: Lisbon, Portugal, 1990; Volume 155. [Google Scholar]
  8. Silvestri, F. Quelques Formes Nouvelles de La Famille Des Machilides. Ann. Sci. Nat. 1907, 6, 361–370. [Google Scholar]
  9. Silvestri, F. Note sui Machilidae. III. Descrizione di un nuovo genere e di sei nuove specie. Redia 1906, 3, 325–335. [Google Scholar]
  10. Silvestri, F. Machilidae (Thysanura). Entomologische Ergebnisse der schwedischen Kamtchatka-Expedition 1920–1922. Ark. För Zool. 1925, 17, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Silvestri, F. Contributo Alla Conoscenza Dei Machilidae Dell’America Settentrionale. Bolletino Lab. Zool. Gen. Agrar. Della R. Sc. Super. d’Agricoltura Portici 1911, 5, 324–350. [Google Scholar]
  12. Silvestri, F. Descripzione Di Alcuni Machilidae (Thysanura) Della Cina. Notes D’entomologie Chin. 1936, 3, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  13. Silvestri, F. Contributto Alla Conoscenza Dei Machilidae (Insecta, Thysanura) Del Giappone. Bolletino Lab. Zool. Gen. Agrar. Della R. Sc. Super. d’Agricoltura Portici 1943, 32, 283–306. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sturm, H. Possibilities and Problems of Morphological Taxonomy Shown by North American Representatives of the Subgenus Pedetontus s. str. and Petridiobius canadensis (Archaeognatha, Machilidae, Petrobiinae). Dtsch. Entomol. Z. 2001, 48, 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  15. Allen, R.T. Pedetontus gershneri, a New Species of Machilidae from the Interior Highlands of North America (Insecta: Microcoryphia). Entomol. News 1995, 106, 195–198. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaplin, V.G. New species of bristletails (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from the Kuril Islands and Primorsky Kari. Txonomy Insects Far East. 1980, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, B.H.; Choe, G.H. Two New Species of Microcoryphia (Insecta) from Korea. Korean J. Syst. Zool. 1992, 8, 19–34. [Google Scholar]
  18. Machida, R. A New Species of the Genus Pedetontus from Japan (Insecta, Thysanura). Annot. Zool. Jpn. 1980, 53, 220–225. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mendes, L.F. Sur Quelques Microcoryphia de l’Asie Orientale: Notes et Descriptions (Insecta; Apterygota). Nouv. Rev. d’Entomologie 1981, 11, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mendes, L. New Contribution towards the Knowledge of the Northern Korean Thysanurans (Microcoryphia and Zygentoma: Insecta). Garcia Orta 1991, 18, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
  21. Uchida, H. Two Species of Pedetontus from Amami-o-Sima (Thysanura: Machilidae). Entomol. Soc. Jpn. 1960, 28, 247–250. [Google Scholar]
  22. Uchida, H. Pedetontus from Formosa (Thysanura: Machilidae). Spec. Bull. Lepidopterol. Soc. Jpn. 1965, 1, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wygodzinsky, P.W. Survey of the Microcoryphia (Insecta) of the Northeastern United States and Adjacent Provinces of Canada; American Museum of Natural History: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xue, L.Z.; Yin, W.Y. Two new species of bristletail from the Tianmu Mountain (Microcoryphia, Machilidae). Contrib. Shanghai Inst. Entomol. 1991, 10, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yu, D.N.; Zhang, W.W.; Zhang, J.Y. Two New Species of the Genus Pedetontus (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 2010, 35, 444–450. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaplin, V.G. New Species of Bristletails of the Genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911 (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from the Far East. Zool. J. 2025, 104, 36–46. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, J.Y.; Song, D.X.; Zhou, K.Y. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Bristletail Pedetontus silvestrii (Archaeognatha: Machilidae) and an Examination of Mitochondrial Gene Variability within Four Bristletails. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2008, 101, 1131–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, H.Y.; Yu, D.N.; Zhang, J.Y. A new species of the genus Pedetontinus (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 2011, 36, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
  29. Deng, K.Z.; Zhang, J.Y.; Yu, D.N. A New Species of the Genus Haslundichilis (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from China and Redescription of Haslundichilis hedini (Silvestri). Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 2011, 36, 882–887. [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, F.S.; Song, Z.S.; Liang, A.P. A New Bristletail Species of the Genus Allopsontus Silvestri (Microcoryphia: Machilidae) from Shaanxi, China. Orient. Insects 2006, 40, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kaplin, V.G. Description of a New Species of the Bristletail Genus Pedetontinus Silv. (Thysanura, Machilidae) from China with a Review of Species of This Genus. Entmol. Rev. 2015, 95, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kaplin, V.G. A New Species of the Genus Allopsontus Silv. (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from Northwestern China. Entomol. Rev. 2016, 96, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaplin, V.G. A New Species of Bristletails of the Genus Silvestrichilis Wygodzinsky, 1950 (Archaeognatha: Machilidae) from South China. Far East. Entomol. 2019, 376, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, P.; Yu, D.N.; Zhang, J.Y. A New Species of the Genus Pedetontinus (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 2012, 37, 740–746. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mendes, L.F.; Gaju-Ricart, M.; Bach de Roca, C.; Molero-Baltanás, R. On Some Silvestri Species of Machilidae (Microcoryphia, Insecta) Which Types Are in the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. Pedobiologia 2000, 44, 268–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shen, C.Y.; Wang, L.Y.; Wu, H.Y.; Zhang, J.Y. A New Species of Silvestrichilis Wygodzinsky, 1950 (Insecta: Microcoryphia) from Wudang Mountain, Hubei, China, with the Description of Both Sexes. Zootaxa 2025, 5621, 437–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Silvestri, F. Schwedisch-chinesiche wissenschaftliche Expedition nach den nordwestlichen Provinzen Chinas (38. Thysanura, Machilidae). Ark. Zool. 1934, 27, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  38. Song, Z.S.; Huang, F.S.; Liang, A.P. Machilontus (s. str.) medogensis Song & Huang, Sp. n. from Tibet, the Northernmost Record of the Genus Machilontus Silvestri, 1912 and the First Record of the Family Meinertellidae (Insecta: Microcoryphia: Machiloidea) in China. Zootaxa 2011, 2822, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, J.Y. A new record genus and species of Machilinae from China (Microcoryphia: Machilidae). Jiangxi Plant Prot. 2010, 33, 57–59. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, J.Y.; Li, T. A New Bristletail Species of the Genus Pedetontinus (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 2009, 34, 203–206. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, J.Y.; Song, D.X.; Zhou, K.Y. A new species of the genus Pedetontinus (Microcoryphia, Machilidae) from China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 2005, 30, 549–554. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, J.Y.; Zhou, K.Y. Descriptions of One New Genus and Six New Species of Machilidae (Insecta: Archaeognatha) from China: Morphological and Molecular Data. J. Nat. Hist. 2011, 45, 1131–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA Primers for Amplification of Mitochondrial Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I from Diverse Metazoan Invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Lanfear, R.; Calcott, B.; Ho, S.Y.W.; Guindon, S. PartitionFinder: Combined Selection of Partitioning Schemes and Substitution Models for Phylogenetic Analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29, 1695–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guan, J.Y.; Shen, S.Q.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Xu, X.D.; Storey, K.B.; Yu, D.N.; Zhang, J.Y. Comparative Mitogenomes of Two Coreamachilis Species (Microcoryphia: Machilidae) Along with Phylogenetic Analyses of Microcoryphia. Insects 2021, 12, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gassner, M.; Dejaco, T.; Schönswetter, P.; Marec, F.; Arthofer, W.; Schlick-Steiner, B.C.; Steiner, F.M. Extensive Variation in Chromosome Number and Genome Size in Sexual and Parthenogenetic Species of the Jumping-Bristletail Genus Machilis (Archaeognatha). Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4, 4093–4105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shen, S.Q.; Cai, Y.Y.; Xu, K.K.; Chen, Q.P.; Cao, S.S.; Yu, D.N.; Zhang, J.Y. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Pedetontus zhejiangensis (Microcoryphia: Machilidae) and Its Phylogeny. Mitochondrial DNA Part. B 2020, 5, 3143–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, K.; Zhang, J.Y.; Deng, K.Z.; Chen, Z. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Bristletail Songmachilis xinxiangensis (Archaeognatha: Machilidae). Mitochondrial DNA 2013, 24, 99–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ma, Y.; He, K.; Yu, P.P.; Yu, D.N.; Cheng, X.F.; Zhang, J.Y. The Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Three Bristletails (Insecta: Archaeognatha): The Paraphyly of Machilidae and Insights into Archaeognathan Phylogeny. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Podsiadlowski, L. The Mitochondrial Genome of the Bristletail Petrobius brevistylis (Archaeognatha: Machilidae). Insect Mol. Biol. 2006, 15, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carapelli, A.; Liò, P.; Nardi, F.; Van der Wath, E.; Frati, F. Phylogenetic Analysis of Mitochondrial Protein Coding Genes Confirms the Reciprocal Paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7, S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cameron, S.L.; Miller, K.B.; D’Haese, C.A.; Whiting, M.F.; Barker, S.C. Mitochondrial Genome Data Alone Are Not Enough to Unambiguously Resolve the Relationships of Entognatha, Insecta and Crustacea Sensu Lato (Arthropoda). Cladistics 2004, 20, 534–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xie, J.; Chen, Y.R.; Cai, G.J.; Cai, R.L.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H. Tree Visualization By One Table (tvBOT): A Web Application for Visualizing, Modifying and Annotating Phylogenetic Trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W587–W592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kaplin, V.G. On the Fauna of Bristletails of the Genera Petrobius and Trigoniophthalmus (Thysanura, Machilidae) from the Caucasus. Entmol. Rev. 2010, 90, 387–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kaplin, V.G. On the Fauna of the Bristletail Family Machilidae (Thysanura) of the Caucasus and Southern Kazakhstan. Entmol. Rev. 2012, 92, 951–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 34. Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree based on a tandem dataset of 41 COX1 genes. Posterior probabilities are shown at the nodes.
Figure 34. Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree based on a tandem dataset of 41 COX1 genes. Posterior probabilities are shown at the nodes.
Insects 16 00916 g034
Table 1. Ratio of compound eyes and ocelli of Pedetontus new species.
Table 1. Ratio of compound eyes and ocelli of Pedetontus new species.
RatioEye Length to WidthEye Contact Line Length to Eye LengthOcellus Length to WidthDistance Between Inner Margins of Ocelli to Combined Width of Eyes
P.  (V.) elegans  sp. n.1.01–1.090.59–0.710.30–0.330.19–0.22
P.  (V.) hezhouensis sp. n.0.79–0.840.32–0.390.35–0.430.18
P.  (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n.0.81–0.850.20–0.250.33–0.360.15–0.16
P.  (V.) nanningensis  sp. n.0.82–0.840.31–0.370.38–0.400.10–0.15
P.  (V.) shenzhenensis sp. n.0.840.410.400.19
P.  (V.) xanthospilus sp. n.0.83–0.840.27–0.280.360.21–0.22
Table 2. Numbers of transparent spines on dorsal surfaces of maxillary palps and sensory cones on apex of labial palp III of Pedetontus new species.
Table 2. Numbers of transparent spines on dorsal surfaces of maxillary palps and sensory cones on apex of labial palp III of Pedetontus new species.
SpeciesNumber of Dorsal Transparent Spines on Maxillary PalpsSensory Cones on Apex of Labial Palp III
VVIVII
P.  (V.) elegans  sp. n.Male1–4 6–147–1425–31
Female2–3 10–1610–1423–26
P.  (V.) hezhouensis sp. n.Male276–750
Female4–511–1511–13 35–39
P.  (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n.Male0–111–128–90–43
Female412150
P.  (V.) nanningensis  sp. n.Male3129–1146–50
Female6–71615–1636–40
P.  (V.) shenzhenensis sp. n.MaleN/AN/AN/AN/A
Female5–616–171336–45
P.  (V.) xanthospilus sp. n.Male0–21012–1455–58
Female2–312–1411–1236–38
Table 3. Number of needle-shaped setae on ventral surfaces of legs of Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans sp. n.
Table 3. Number of needle-shaped setae on ventral surfaces of legs of Pedetontus (Verhoeffilis) elegans sp. n.
LegsNumber of Needle-Shaped Setae on Ventral Surfaces
ForelegFemur0
Tibia0
TarsiTarsomere I2
Tarsomere II5
Tarsomere III0
MidlegFemur0
Tibia0
TarsiTarsomere I3
Tarsomere II6
Tarsomere III1
HindlegFemur0
Tibia4
TarsiTarsomere I3
Tarsomere II10
Tarsomere III
Table 4. Angles of posterior angles (°) of abdominal sternites of Pedetontus new species.
Table 4. Angles of posterior angles (°) of abdominal sternites of Pedetontus new species.
SpeciesUrosternite IUrosternite IIUrosternite IIIUrosternite IVUrosternite VUrosternite VIUrosternite VIIUrosternite VIII (Male)
P. elegans (V.) sp. n.129–13878–9288–9392–9486–9574–9299–113123
P. hezhouensis (V.) sp. n.129–13178–8778–8382–8381–8491–9689–10091
P. jinxiuensis (V.) sp. n.129–14168–7675–7779–8275–8479–9579–9795
P. nanningensis (V.) sp. n.123–12967–8868–8278–8683–8879–8880–10184
P. shenzhenensis (V.) sp. n.140807377777781N/A
P. xanthospilus (V.) sp. n.123–12976–8373–8078–8084–86 82–8383–8980
Table 5. Ratios of styli length to coxites length on abdominal segment V, styli length to supporting spines length, and basal width to length of sternite.
Table 5. Ratios of styli length to coxites length on abdominal segment V, styli length to supporting spines length, and basal width to length of sternite.
RatioStyli (Without Supporting Spines) Length to Coxites Length of Abdominal Segment VStyli (Without Supporting Spines) Length to Supporting Spines Length of Abdominal Segment VBasal Width to Length of Sternite of Abdominal Segment V
P. (V.) elegans sp. n.0.58–0.640.40–0.431.33–1.34
P. (V.) hezhouensis sp. n.0.42–0.480.53–0.581.08–1.24
P. (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n.0.37–0.430.65–0.711.18–1.21
P.  (V.) nanningensis sp. n.0.430.521.06–1.36
P.  (V.) shenzhenensis  sp. n.0.470.601.20
P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n.0.38–0.410.55–0.681.19–1.25
Table 6. Number of segments of anterior gonapophyses and posterior gonapophyses of Pedetontus new species.
Table 6. Number of segments of anterior gonapophyses and posterior gonapophyses of Pedetontus new species.
SpeciesNumber of Segments of Anterior GonapophysesNumber of Segments of Posterior Gonapophyses
P. (V.) elegans sp. n.56–59 58–63
P. (V.) hezhouensis sp. n.60–67 53–55
P. (V.) jinxiuensis sp. n.6056–58
P.  (V.) nanningensis sp. n.5950–55
P.  (V.) shenzhenensis  sp. n.42–54 48–49
P. (V.) xanthospilus sp. n.50–51 49
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, C.-Y.; Yang, T.; Ji, J.-H.; Zhang, J.-Y. Six New Species of Genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911 (Microcoryphia: Machilidae), from Southern China. Insects 2025, 16, 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090916

AMA Style

Shen C-Y, Yang T, Ji J-H, Zhang J-Y. Six New Species of Genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911 (Microcoryphia: Machilidae), from Southern China. Insects. 2025; 16(9):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090916

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Chen-Yang, Ting Yang, Jie-Hong Ji, and Jia-Yong Zhang. 2025. "Six New Species of Genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911 (Microcoryphia: Machilidae), from Southern China" Insects 16, no. 9: 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090916

APA Style

Shen, C.-Y., Yang, T., Ji, J.-H., & Zhang, J.-Y. (2025). Six New Species of Genus Pedetontus Silvestri, 1911 (Microcoryphia: Machilidae), from Southern China. Insects, 16(9), 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090916

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop