Next Article in Journal
New Amber Fossils Indicate That Larvae of Dermestidae Had Longer Defensive Structures in the Past
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Pupal Parasitoids Trichomalopsis ovigastra and Pachycrepoideus vindemiae as Potential Biological Control Agents of Bactrocera dorsalis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inheritance Mode of a Red-Eye Mutation in Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae)

by
María del Carmen Reche
,
Carolina Grávalos
,
Virginia Balanza
,
Ana Belén Abelaira
,
Amador Rodríguez-Gómez
and
Pablo Bielza
*
Biocontrol Selection Lab, Departamento de Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(7), 709; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070709
Submission received: 19 May 2025 / Revised: 4 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 10 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Ecology, Diversity and Conservation)

Simple Summary

Macrolophus pygmaeus is an important biological control agent used to manage whiteflies and other arthropod pests in greenhouse crops. The typical eye color of adult individuals of this predator ranges from garnet to black. However, adults with bright red eyes were found in wild populations. The aim of this study was to determine the mode of inheritance of this mutation. In addition, the biological traits of the red-eyed population were compared with those of a normal population. To achieve this, a laboratory population carrying this red eye color mutation was established. The mutation, known as ruby, is controlled by a single autosomal recessive allele. The red-eyed individuals showed superior performance in certain traits, such as the size of both males and females, as well as the fecundity and longevity of females. Finally, it is suggested that this red-eyed variant could serve as a useful visual marker for scientific studies on the biology and ecology of this beneficial insect.

Abstract

A mutation affecting eye color was discovered in Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) (Hemiptera: Miridae). This species is an important biological control agent used to manage whiteflies and other arthropod pests in greenhouse crops. Typically, these predators exhibit a dark eye coloration, ranging from garnet to black. However, individuals with bright red eyes have been identified within wild populations, making them easily distinguishable. The objective of this study was to study the mode of inheritance of the red eye color mutation observed. Additionally, a comparative analysis of key biological traits was conducted between individuals carrying the mutation and those from a wild-type population. From these specimens, a population carrying this eye color mutation, referred to as ruby, was established. Genetic analyses revealed that the red coloration is controlled by a single recessive allele located on an autosomal chromosome. Red-eyed individuals exhibited superior performance in biological traits, including greater body size in both males and females, as well as increased fecundity and longevity in females. The utilization of this red-eyed variant could be valuable as a visual marker in ecological and biological studies of population dynamics.

1. Introduction

Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) (Hemiptera: Miridae) is a natural enemy with a key role in the biological control of whiteflies and other small arthropod pests in protected crops in the temperate and Mediterranean regions of Europe [1,2,3]. With the aim of enhancing its performance in the field and optimizing its large-scale rearing in biofactories, M. pygmaeus has been the subject of numerous studies in various laboratories to deepen the understanding of its biology and ecology [4,5,6].
In 2022, a single female M. pygmaeus with bright red eyes (Figure 1) was observed. This female was used to establish a population of red-eyed M. pygmaeus. In insects, most mutations that alter eye color are recessive and usually involve a single gene [7]. No previous studies have documented populations of M. pygmaeus with bright red eyes. However, similar studies have been conducted on Orius sauteri and O. strigicollis (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) and Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae) [8,9]. In both studies, it was concluded that the mutant red eye color was determined by a single autosomal recessive allele.
Eye-color mutants have been exploited for over a century as convenient, scorable markers in insects because a single recessive allele can produce a conspicuous phenotype without impairing viability. In Drosophila melanogaster, more than 85 eye-color loci have been described, which fall into three functional classes: (i) enzymes of the ommochrome or pteridine biosynthetic pathways (e.g., vermilion, cinnabar), (ii) ATP-binding-cassette transporters that import precursors into lysosome-derived pigment granules (e.g., white, scarlet, brown), and (iii) the so-called “granule-group” genes that control biogenesis and cargo delivery to those granules [10].
Granule-group mutations illustrate how defects in vesicle trafficking can mimic the loss of pigment enzymes. Classical alleles of ruby, garnet, carmine, and orange disrupt the four sub-units of the adaptor-protein-3 (AP-3) complex; as a consequence, both brown ommochromes and red pteridines fail to accumulate, yielding brick-red eyes and, in stronger alleles, reduced adult fitness [11]. More recent forward-genetic screens have uncovered additional trafficking genes whose loss has similar effects, including the vacuolar ATPase sub-unit (chocolate) and components of the HOPS/CORVET tethering complex (deep-orange, carnation) [11].
Two studies emphasize that single-gene lesions outside the classical pathways are sufficient to alter insect eye color. A missense mutation in the t-SNARE gene SNAP29 was shown to be the long-sought purpleoid 1 allele: homozygous flies display viable but maroon-colored eyes because defective SNARE pairing blocks pigment-granule fusion [12]. Likewise, an RNase-dead allele of the ER-stress sensor Ire1 abolishes pigment granules altogether, leading to a marked reduction of both ommochrome and pteridine pigments and secondary changes in photoreceptor physiology [13]. Orthologues of AP-3 sub-units, HOPS tethers, SNAREs, and Ire1 are conserved in hemipterans and other non-dipteran insects, suggesting that mutations in these genes can elicit red-eye phenotypes well beyond Drosophila.
Given this broad genetic landscape, the aim of the present study was to compare life-history traits of bright-red-eyed M. pygmaeus with those of wild-type and hybrid lines, and to determine whether the red-eyed phenotype segregates as a recessive allele at an autosomal locus or might instead reflect alternative defects in pigment-granule trafficking genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

The normal and red-eyed populations alike were reared in the laboratory by using 1 L plastic containers covered with filter paper on the lid, with ad libitum access to Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs as food, green bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as the moisture source and egg-laying substrate, and pieces of paper as hiding places to avoid cannibalism. The populations were maintained under controlled conditions at 26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, and an L16:D8 light regime. The populations were reproduced in the laboratory for 2–4 generations before the experiments.

2.2. Development of the Red-Eyed Population

In 2022, a female exhibiting a distinct red eye color was identified within a population maintained in the Biocontrol Selection Lab (Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain). For the purpose of establishing a red eye mutant population (hereafter red-eyed), the red-eye-color virgin female was crossed with a normal male of M. pygmaeus from a standard population (hereafter Normal) established in our lab. The offspring born from them were all normal adults. These normal F1 M. pygmaeus progeny were interbred with each other and produced both normal and red-eyed adults. The red-eyed adults (females and males) were selected to establish a pure red-eyed population carrying the mutation ruby.

2.3. Genetic Cross

Genetic crosses were performed to analyze the inheritance mechanism of the ruby mutation associated with red eye pigmentation in M. pygmaeus. Fifth instar nymphs were isolated and reared individually until adulthood. To produce the F1 generation, virgin red-eyed females and males were mated with virgin females and males from the normal population. A total of 22 crosses were made, 9 pairs of red-eyed females and normal males and another 13 pairings of opposite sexes. The total number of nymphs was recorded and categorized by group and by the corresponding female (1 to 13).
Red eye coloration was absent in all adults resulting from the initial crosses. Upon reaching adulthood, the offspring were backcrossed with both parental lines (red-eyed and Normal). For every cross, approximately 7 to 10 virgin females, along with an equal number of virgin males, were placed into 60 mL cups with Ephestia eggs as food and a piece of green bean pod for oviposition. Every three days, the bean pods were exchanged for new ones, and the nymphs born were counted. Individuals were kept separately in individual containers, and their eye color was noted upon reaching adulthood. The leftover F1 males and females, following the backcrosses, were mated among themselves to produce the F2 generation. These cross experiments were maintained under controlled conditions at 26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, and L16:D8 light regime. The last instar nymphs were placed individually into plastic cups (30 mL) with E. kuehniella eggs ad libitum as food and a piece of green bean pod to prevent mating upon adult emergence. Newly emerged adults (<24 h) were sexed.

2.4. Nymphal Survival, Developmental and Body Weight Adult

Green bean pods were introduced in the rearing containers for the females to lay eggs. After 24 h, the bean pods were collected and these eggs were developed. Seventy-five first instars (<24 h old) were placed in an individual plastic cup (500 mL) covered with paper secured by a rubber band. For each population, 5 replicates were established, containing the bean pod provided as a water source and E. kuehniella eggs as food. The maintenance of these repetitions was carried out twice a week, changing the bean and adding more food. Upon adult emergence, the survivors of each population were counted. The experiment was performed under standard laboratory conditions, 26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, and a light regime of L16:D8. Once the adults emerged, a group of 10 males and another group of 10 females per replication were formed to study their size, with individuals being weighed on a precision scale.

2.5. Female Fertility and Longevity Trial

We conducted a separate experiment to study the reproductive biological characteristics of the new red-eyed population compared to a standard one. Once the nymphs from both populations emerged as adults, they were given 5 days for copulation to take place between males and females. After this period, for each population, 30 females were individually deposited in 60 mL plastic cups covered with a perforated lid to allow ventilation containing E. kuehniella eggs ad libitum and a piece of green bean pod.
Macrolophus pygmaeus eggs are not easily seen with a stereoscopic magnifying glass. Therefore, we counted the emergence of nymphs N1. The beans that were removed were placed in plastic cups (60 mL) with a small number of E. kuehniella eggs, and after 10 days, the number of individuals was counted. The trial was performed under standard laboratory conditions, 26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% R.H. and a 16:8 (L:D) h. Every 2–3 days, food was added, and the bean was exchanged for a fresh piece. Early fertility (14 days) was assessed.

2.6. Data Analysis

A chi-square test was conducted to compare the observed eye color proportions (red vs. normal) with the expected ratios of 1:3 for F2 crosses and 1:1 for backcrosses. Differences in biological and ecological traits between the two populations were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Prior to analysis, assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances were verified. When significant differences were detected, means were compared using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test.

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Cross

The results of the red- and normal-eyed crosses comprised offspring with standard-color eyes (F1), except for those crosses when both the male and the female had red eyes (Table 1). Inbreeding between F1 individuals (RN × RN and NR × NR) produced F2 offspring, presenting the expected ratio 1:3. The same happened in the case of backcrosses using parents, for which the offspring fitted with the expected ratio 1:1.

3.2. Nymphal Survival and Developmental

The results of survival and duration of immature development from N1 to adult are summarized in Figure 2. No significant differences were detected in immature survival between the populations tested (F = 0.48, df = 1/8, p > 0.05). Similarly, the development time (Figure 3) in the red-eyed population was the same in the standard population (F = 0.93, df = 1/8, p > 0.05).

3.3. Male and Female Body Weight

The weights of males and females from both studied populations are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. Significant differences were observed in the sizes of males between the two populations (F = 106.71, df = 1/7, p < 0.05), with the males from the red-eyed population being larger, exhibiting an average weight close to 0.6 mg. In contrast, the weights of males from the standard population were around 0.5 mg. The same trend was observed with the weights of females from both populations, as significant differences were also present (F = 6.62, df = 1/7, p < 0.05). Once again, the females from the red-eyed population were heavier (close to 1 mg) compared to those from the normal population (approximately 0.8 mg).

3.4. Female Fertility and Longevity

The results for the fertility and longevity of females from the red-eyed and normal populations are show in Figure 6. The fertility (N1/female) was much lower in the normal population than in the red-eyed population (F = 5.01, df = 1/42, p < 0.05). In the same way, the longevity (Figure 7) in the red-eyed population was greater than in the normal population (F = 0.93, df = 1/8, p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Experimental crosses revealed that the ruby mutant of M. pygmaeus was controlled by a single autosomal recessive allele. Eye color mutations have been studied in other insects of the Hemiptera family, such as Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae), whose mutations affecting eye color were inherited as autosomal recessive genes [8]. There is also an orange-eyed mutant of Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) whose inheritance is controlled by a single autosomal recessive allele [14]. Mutants with red eyes were also found in the flower bugs Orius sauteri (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) and O. strigicollis [9]. These mutants have bright red-colored eyes and are easy to differentiate. This study also demonstrated that the red-eye trait was recessive and inferred that the locus was autosomal in both species. Moreover, in another study by our research team, a mutant of Orius laevigatus emerged whose nymphs exhibited an orange coloration. It was also demonstrated that the inheritance of this color was controlled by a single autosomal recessive allele [15].
On the other hand, we found a study on O. strigicollis in which the authors demonstrated a method to obtain red-eyed offspring using a simple and accessible genetic editing technique for insects called direct parental CRISPR (DIPA-CRISPR) [16]. They focused on the cinnabar gene, which encodes kynurenine 3-monooxygenase, an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of the ommochrome pigment [17,18]. The inactivation of the cinnabar gene results in red-eyed phenotypes in various insect species, including hemipterans [19,20]. Nevertheless, red-eyed phenotypes can also emerge from defects in genes that govern the biogenesis or trafficking of pigment granules. In Drosophila, the loss of function of the ER-stress sensor Ire1 eliminates pigment granules and simultaneously reduces both ommochrome and pteridine pigments, yielding pale red eyes [13]. Missense or null alleles of the t-SNARE gene SNAP29 (purpleoid) disrupt vesicle fusion and create a maroon-red eye color [12]. Likewise, mutations in the AP-3 adaptor-complex genes (ruby, garnet, carmine, orange) and other “granule-group” trafficking genes (deep orange, carnation, light) diminish pigment deposition and generate brick-red eyes [10,11]. These studies indicate that multiple molecular routes can converge on a red-eyed phenotype. Consequently, while the spontaneous red-eyed strain of M. pygmaeus is most parsimoniously explained by a naturally occurring loss-of-function in cinnabar—analogous to the classical ruby allele in flies—alternative mutations affecting pigment-granule trafficking remain plausible until molecular confirmation is obtained.
Regarding survival, previous studies have reported nymphal survival rates of M. pygmaeus feeding on E. kuehniella ranging from 80% to 90% [21,22,23]. Our findings fell within this range, at around 80% survival. Moreover, the development time we observed (approximately 16 days) aligns with the results in [22], although other authors have reported a slightly longer period (18–19 days) [20,22]. Borges et al. [23] reported a male size of M. pygmaeus fed on Ephestia eggs of 0.65 mg and females with a size of 1.1 mg. These results support those obtained for the red-eyed population; however, the weights of both sexes in the standard population were slightly lower than those of the red-eyed population. Similarly, body size plays a crucial role in a predator, as it is closely linked to the type and size of prey it can hunt [24].
Differences in fertility were observed between the two populations. Females from the standard population laid approximately 32 N1 nymphs, consistent with the findings of Vanderkerkhove et al. [21], who reported an average of 32 eggs per female from a normal eye population. However, the red-eyed population exhibited higher fertility (50 N1/female) compared to our standard population. Fertility rates reported in other studies range from 45 to 80 N1 per female from a normal eye population [22,23]. There were also differences in female longevity between the standard and red-eyed populations. However, previous studies [23] reported longer longevity from a normal eye population, ranging from 48 to 50 days. While our population’s female longevity was between 10 and 14 days.
The eye color mutation in M. pygmaeus serves as a highly useful visual marker for biological and ecological research on this predator used in biological control. The red-eyed population, which carries the ruby mutation, appears to exhibit improved performance in certain biological traits, such as body size, longevity and fecundity. For this reason, this mutation could be introgressed into high-performance strains. Strains with and without the ruby mutation can be used to compare the establishment and efficacy of biological control in different populations of this insect. Furthermore, the red-eyed population is valuable for studies on the dispersal and distribution of M. pygmaeus within and between plants, crops, and fields, preventing confusion between released individuals and wild populations. Understanding the movement and population dynamics of this predator is crucial for enhancing integrated pest management programs, particularly in augmentative and conservation biological control strategies.
In laboratory studies, the ruby mutation can also be employed in research on parentage and reproductive behavior, allowing the assessment of sexual competition among different strains. In conclusion, this mutation provides new opportunities for the technical and scientific advancement of M. pygmaeus as a biological control agent.

Author Contributions

P.B. conceived the research. M.d.C.R. and P.B. designed the experiments. M.d.C.R., C.G., V.B., A.B.A. and A.R.-G. collected and prepared the material. M.d.C.R., C.G., V.B., A.B.A. and A.R.-G. conducted the experiments and collected data. P.B. supervised the experiments. M.d.C.R., C.G. and P.B. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study formed part of the AGROALNEXT programme and was supported by MICIU with funding from European Union NextGenerationEU (PRTR-C17.I1) and by Fundación Séneca with funding from Comunidad Autónoma Región de Murcia (CARM). M.d.C.R. contract PRE2021-100148 was funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FSE+. C.G. contract was funded by the AGROALNEXT program, which has been funded by MICIU with NextGenerationEU funds (PRTR-C17.I1) and by the Comunidad Autónoma Región de Murcia through the Seneca Foundation—Science and Technology Agency of the Region of Murcia. A.R.-G. contract was co-financed by project PID2020-116897RB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the R&D Support Plan of the Polytechnic University of Cartagena. V.B. contract was funded by project PDC2021-121383-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union Next GenerationEU/PRTR. A.B.A. contract was co-financed by grant 21578/FPI/21 from the Seneca Foundation (Murcia Region) and Agrobío.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Barnadas, I.; Gabarra, R. Predatory capacity of two mirid bugs preying on Bemisia tabaci. Entomol. Exp Appl. 1998, 86, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alvarado, P.; Balta, O. Efficiency of four Heteroptera as predators of Aphis gossypii and Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Hom.: Aphididae). BioControl 1997, 42, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Riudavets, J.; Castañé, C. Identification and evaluation of native predators of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in the Mediterranean. Environ. Entomol. 1998, 27, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vandekerkhove, B.; De Clercq, P. Pollen as an alternative or supplementary food for the mirid predator Macrolophus pygmaeus. Biol. Control 2010, 53, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Margaritopoulos, J.T.; Tsitsipis, J.A.; Perdikis, D.C. Biological characteristics of the mirids Macrolophus costalis and Macrolophus pygmaeus preying on the tobacco form of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2003, 93, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Riudavets, J.; Arnó, J.; Castañé, C. Rearing predatory bugs with the brine shrimp Artemia sp. as alternative prey food. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 2006, 29, 235–240. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dustmann, J.H. Eye-colour mutants of the honeybee. Bee World 1987, 68, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Snodgrass, G.L. Characteristics of A Red-Eye Mutant of the Tarnished Plant Bug (Heteroptera: Miridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2002, 95, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shimizu, T.; Kawasaki, K. Red-eye mutants in Orius bugs (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2001, 36, 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lloyd, V.; Ramaswami, M.; Krämer, H. Not just pretty eyes: Drosophila eye-colour mutations and lysosomal delivery. Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grant, P.; Maga, T.; Loshakov, A.; Singhal, R.; Wali, A.; Nwankwo, J.; Baron, K.; Johnson, D. An eye on trafficking genes: Identification of four eye color mutations in Drosophila. G3: Genes Genomes Genet. 2016, 6, 3185–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dean, D.M.; Codd, L.E.; Constanza, R.; Segel, X.M. purpleoid 1, a classic Drosophila eye color mutation, is an allele of the t-SNARE-encoding gene SNAP29. Micropubl. Biol. 2025, 10-17912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mitra, S.; Ryoo, H.D. The role of Ire1 in Drosophila eye pigmentation revealed by an RNase dead allele. Dev. Biol. 2021, 478, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Seo, B.Y.; Jung, J.K.; Kim, Y. An orange-eye mutant of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2011, 14, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rodríguez-Gómez, A.; Donate, A.; Sánchez-Martínez, I.; Balanza, V.; Abelaira, A.B.; Reche, M.D.C.; Bielza, P. Inheritance and biological characterization of an orange-nymph mutant in Orius laevigatus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Insects 2022, 13, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Matsuda, N.; Takahashi, M.; Shirai, Y.; Hinomoto, N.; Daimon, T. Direct parental CRISPR gene editing in the predatory bug Orius strigicollis, a biocontrol agent against small arthropods. Pest Manag. Sci. 2024, 80, 5465–5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lorenzen, M.D.; Brown, S.J.; Denell, R.; Beeman, R.W. Cloning and characterization of the Tribolium castaneum eye-color genes encoding tryptophan oxygenase and kynurenine 3-monooxygenase. Genetics 2002, 160, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Quan, G.-X.; Kim, I.; Komoto, N.; Sezutsu, H.; Ote, M.; Shimada, T.; Kanda, T.; Mita, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Tamura, T. Characterization of the kynurenine 3-monooxygenase gene corresponding to the white egg 1 mutant in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2002, 267, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xue, W.-H.; Xu, N.; Yuan, X.-B.; Chen, H.-H.; Zhang, J.-L.; Fu, S.-J.; Xu, H.-J. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of two eye pigmentation genes in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 93, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heu, C.C.; Gross, R.J.; Le, K.P.; LeRoy, D.M.; Fan, B.; Hull, J.J.; Fabrick, J.A. CRISPR-mediated knockout of cardinal and cinnabar eye pigmentation genes in the western tarnished plant bug. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vandekerkhove, B.; Parmentier, L.; Van Stappen, G.; Grenier, S.; Febvay, G.; Rey, M.; De Clercq, P. Artemia cysts as an alternative food for the predatory bug Macrolophus pygmaeus. J. Appl. Entomol. 2009, 133, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sylla, S.; Brévault, T.; Diarra, K.; Bearez, P.; Desneux, N. Life-history traits of Macrolophus pygmaeus with different prey foods. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Borges, I.; Oliveira, L.; Durão, A.C.; Arruda, P.; Figueiredo, E.; Franco, J.C.; Soares, A.O. Contrasting phenotypic variability of life-history traits of two feral populations of Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae) under two alternative diets. Agronomy 2023, 13, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cohen, J.E.; Pimm, S.L.; Yodzis, P.; Saldana, J. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 1993, 62, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Detail of the eye of Macrolophus pygmaeus. (Left): Normal strain. (Right): Red-eyed strain.
Figure 1. Detail of the eye of Macrolophus pygmaeus. (Left): Normal strain. (Right): Red-eyed strain.
Insects 16 00709 g001
Figure 2. Mean survival ± SE during the development. Survival (%) from N1 to adult by population. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). Five repetitions of 75 N1 individuals per population.
Figure 2. Mean survival ± SE during the development. Survival (%) from N1 to adult by population. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). Five repetitions of 75 N1 individuals per population.
Insects 16 00709 g002
Figure 3. Mean development time ± SE. Development time (days) from N1 to adult by population. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). Five repetitions of 75 N1 individuals per population.
Figure 3. Mean development time ± SE. Development time (days) from N1 to adult by population. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). Five repetitions of 75 N1 individuals per population.
Insects 16 00709 g003
Figure 4. Body size (mg) ± SE of males of Macrolophus pygmaeus feeding on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). A group of 10 males per replicate and population, 5 replicates per population.
Figure 4. Body size (mg) ± SE of males of Macrolophus pygmaeus feeding on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). A group of 10 males per replicate and population, 5 replicates per population.
Insects 16 00709 g004
Figure 5. Body size (mg) ± SE of females of Macrolophus pygmaeus feeding on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). A group of 10 females per replicate and population, 5 replicates per population.
Figure 5. Body size (mg) ± SE of females of Macrolophus pygmaeus feeding on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). A group of 10 females per replicate and population, 5 replicates per population.
Insects 16 00709 g005
Figure 6. Mean total fertility (N1/female) ± SE of females of Macrolophus pygmaeus feeding on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). Thirty females per population.
Figure 6. Mean total fertility (N1/female) ± SE of females of Macrolophus pygmaeus feeding on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). Thirty females per population.
Insects 16 00709 g006
Figure 7. Mean longevity (days) ± SE of females of Macrolophus pygmaeus feeding on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). Thirty females per population.
Figure 7. Mean longevity (days) ± SE of females of Macrolophus pygmaeus feeding on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Means within a graph followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05; Tukey test). Thirty females per population.
Insects 16 00709 g007
Table 1. Adult eyes color in offspring of crosses and backcrosses between mutant (red-eyed) and standard (normal) Macrolophus pygmaeus populations.
Table 1. Adult eyes color in offspring of crosses and backcrosses between mutant (red-eyed) and standard (normal) Macrolophus pygmaeus populations.
Cross (Female × Male)Red (R)Normal (N)Expected Ratio (R:N)Observed Ratio (R:N)χ2p
R × N (9)01270:10:1
N × R (13)01270:10:1
R × R (12)10601:01:0
RN × RN (8)501501:31:3.000.0070.935
NR × NR (8)501281:31:2.560.7490.387
RN × RR (8)67841:11:1.251.6950.193
RR × RN (7)59761:11:1.311.8960.169
NR × RR (8)65871:11:1.332.9010.089
RR × NR (10)841041:11:1.241.9200.166
The number in brackets is the number of couples used in each cross. The offspring of each cross was recorded in the adult stage. NR: Offspring of standard (normal) females and mutant (red-eyed) males; RN: offspring of mutant (red-eyed) females and standard (normal) males. RR: offspring of mutant (red-eyed) females and mutant (red) males.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reche, M.d.C.; Grávalos, C.; Balanza, V.; Abelaira, A.B.; Rodríguez-Gómez, A.; Bielza, P. Inheritance Mode of a Red-Eye Mutation in Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae). Insects 2025, 16, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070709

AMA Style

Reche MdC, Grávalos C, Balanza V, Abelaira AB, Rodríguez-Gómez A, Bielza P. Inheritance Mode of a Red-Eye Mutation in Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae). Insects. 2025; 16(7):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reche, María del Carmen, Carolina Grávalos, Virginia Balanza, Ana Belén Abelaira, Amador Rodríguez-Gómez, and Pablo Bielza. 2025. "Inheritance Mode of a Red-Eye Mutation in Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae)" Insects 16, no. 7: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070709

APA Style

Reche, M. d. C., Grávalos, C., Balanza, V., Abelaira, A. B., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., & Bielza, P. (2025). Inheritance Mode of a Red-Eye Mutation in Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae). Insects, 16(7), 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16070709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop