Next Article in Journal
Exploration of the Effects of Different Beauveria bassiana Strains on Dioryctria sylvestrella Larvae from the Perspective of Oxidative Stress
Previous Article in Journal
The Dysregulation of Tuning Receptors and Transcription Factors in the Antennae of Orco and Ir8a Mutants in Aedes aegypti Suggests a Chemoreceptor Regulatory Mechanism Involving the MMB/dREAM Complex
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trends and Emerging Hotspots in Toxicology of Chironomids: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Animal Diversity, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2025, 16(6), 639; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060639
Submission received: 15 May 2025 / Revised: 12 June 2025 / Accepted: 13 June 2025 / Published: 17 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Other Arthropods and General Topics)

Simple Summary

This study examines how water pollution harms chironomids—small aquatic insects that help scientists track ecosystem health. By analyzing over 1400 research papers, we found that heavy metals, pesticides, and microplastics are the most studied pollutants, with Chironomus riparius being the most common species tested. Research in this field has grown since 1998, showing rising global concern about water pollution. However, more studies are needed at the molecular level to fully understand how these toxins affect insects. This research can help guide better pollution control policies and protect water ecosystems, benefiting both the health of living beings in nature and humans by providing timely biological monitoring information.

Abstract

(1) Background: Aquatic organisms are more sensitive to pollutants than terrestrial ones, making them ideal for ecotoxicology studies. Chironomids, a key bioindicator species, have been widely used in environmental pollution research. With the continuous deepening of research on water environmental pollution and the continuous development of molecular biology, it is therefore very important to understand the current research progress of the toxicology of chironomids. (2) Methods: This study used bibliometrics to analyze 1465 publications on chironomid toxicology from the Web of Science and PubMed databases, aiming to reveal research trends, hotspots, and future directions. The data analysis involved Microsoft Excel, VOS viewer, CiteSpace, and ChatGLM. (3) Results: Heavy metals, pesticides, and microplastics were the main pollutants studied, with Chironomus riparius being the most researched species. The analysis indicated a growing research trend since 1998, reflecting an increasing global concern over aquatic pollution. This study concludes that more molecular-level research is needed to uncover toxic mechanisms and improve environmental risk assessments. (4) Conclusions: This work will aid scientists and policymakers in developing better pollution control strategies and conservation efforts for aquatic ecosystems, ultimately contributing to environmental protection and public health.

1. Introduction

The Chironomidae family belongs to the Diptera order and is an important insect species in aquatic ecosystems, widely distributed around the world [1]. In benthic communities, the larvae of the Chironomidae family are the most common species of sedimentary animals in freshwater ecosystems, serving as the primary food source for fish and invertebrates and occupying an important ecological position in freshwater ecosystems [2]. Due to its wide distribution, short lifespan, easy identification of different stages, and high sensitivity to toxins, Chironomidae are widely used as indicator species for environmental pollutants in aquatic ecosystems [3]. Chironomids are used in toxicological experiments and are often employed to detect biological indicators after being treated with chemicals, including population changes (mortality, growth rate, behavior, and reproduction) [4,5], the mouthpart deformities of the larvae [6], and the giant polytene chromosomes from the salivary gland cells [7]. With the continuous acceleration of industrialization, the problem of water pollution is becoming increasingly serious; specifically, the threat of chemical pollutants such as heavy metals and pesticides to aquatic organisms is becoming increasingly prominent [8,9,10,11].
Environmental toxicology studies the impact of environmental toxins on the health of living organisms and the environment [12]. The pollution of water environments mainly includes heavy metals, pesticides and related materials, organic compounds, and sediment. In addition, physical factors such as extreme temperatures and radiation, as well as other biological influences, can cause serious environmental problems. Since the 20th century, the heavy metal content in water environments has rapidly increased mainly due to human activities, including metal mining and smelting, waste leaching, and agricultural use [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Multiple heavy metals can accumulate in different organs of humans and cause serious diseases [20]. Pesticides are a type of toxic substance intentionally released by humans to purposefully kill certain organisms, such as weeds, insects, fungi, or rodents [21]. Pesticides are often used in public health activities to control the spread of diseases or prevent the growth of harmful organisms in daily necessities [22]. However, many people may be exposed to certain concentrations of pesticides, which can have adverse effects on their health, especially on children [23,24]. The organic compounds with a high toxicity in aquatic environments are mainly leachable or soluble chemical products, and the hazards of microplastics have been discovered in recent years [25]. Plastic products are released into the air from various sources [26] and cause freshwater pollution [27,28,29]. The accumulation of these microplastics in the human body can also lead to diseases [30,31,32,33,34,35]. In water bodies, various toxic substances can deposit in sediments, causing diverse and complex pollution [36,37,38]. Due to the cocktail effect and synergistic effect of chemical substances, the toxicity of the mixture is also of concern to the public and regulatory agencies [39,40,41]. Physical conditions also have different impacts on aquatic ecology, including salinity stress, temperature, radiation [42,43,44], etc.
Compared to terrestrial organisms, aquatic organisms are more sensitive to exposure and toxicity, and can be used to obtain more accurate data [45]. Therefore, aquatic organisms are used for toxicological research projects [46,47,48]. Among them, as a suitable research species, the chironomid has been extensively studied [49,50,51,52,53]. In the USA, the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) have certified Chironomidae animals as recommended species for testing environmental pollutants in freshwater invertebrates [54,55]. With the increasing importance of water environmental pollution issues and the continuous development of new technologies and molecular-level technologies, it is important to statistically sort out the previous toxicological research on chironomids, focusing on pollutants, research species, and research levels.
In recent years, bibliometrics has gradually become an important analytical tool for scientific research [56]. Bibliometrics can reveal key issues such as disciplinary development trends, research hotspots, and academic influence through the quantitative analysis of a large number of studies [57]. Our study used traditional bibliometric methods and the GLM 4 Plus model from ChatGLM from Zhipu AI to understand and analyze the toxicological research on chironomids. Based on 1465 articles (Table S1), we collected bibliometric data and captured the research species, toxicological methods, and research directions in the articles to review the past research progress and provide more directions for future research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources and Search Strategies

We searched and obtained relevant data from Web of Science (core collection) and PubMed. Three words related to chironomid were selected to exact terms related to environmental toxicology, so as to comprehensively collect the literature as much as possible. The search formula was conducted as follows: TS = ((“Chironomidae” AND “Toxicology”) OR (“Chironomidae” AND “environmental toxicology”) OR (“Chironomidae” AND “xenobiotic response”) OR (“Chironomidae” AND “xenobiotics”)OR (“Chironomidae” AND “toxic resistance”) OR (“Chironomidae” AND “pollution”) OR (“Chironomidae” AND “environmental contamination”) OR (“Chironomidae” AND “heavy metal”) OR (“Chironomidae” AND “environment”)OR (“Chironomidae” AND “exposure”)OR (“Chironomus” AND “Toxicology”) OR (“Chironomus” AND “environmental toxicology”) OR (“Chironomus” AND “xenobiotic response”) OR (“Chironomus” AND “xenobiotics”)OR (“Chironomus” AND “toxic resistance”) OR (“Chironomus” AND “pollution”) OR (“Chironomus” AND “environmental contamination”) OR (“Chironomus” AND “heavy metal”) OR (“Chironomus” AND “environment”)OR (“Chironomus” AND “exposure”)OR (“Chironomid” AND “Toxicology”) OR (“Chironomid” AND “environmental toxicology”) OR (“Chironomid” AND “xenobiotic response”) OR (“Chironomid” AND “xenobiotics”)OR (“Chironomid” AND “toxic resistance”) OR (“Chironomid” AND “pollution”) OR (“Chironomid” AND “environmental contamination “) OR (“Chironomid” AND “heavy metal”) OR (“Chironomid” AND “environment”)OR (“Chironomid” AND “exposure”)). It should be particularly pointed out that there are differences among the terms chironomid, Chironomidae, and Chironomus. “Chironomid is a broader term, referring to all the species of Chironomidae, while Chironomidae is the family name and Chironomus is the genus name, referring to a genus within Chironomidae.” In order to obtain sufficient articles, the search formula we constructed contains all three words. The main literature type we studied is limited to research articles, and the language used is limited to English. The search result export date was set as 31 December 2024. By comparing the article information obtained from the Web of Science (Core Collection) and PubMed, duplicate articles were screened. In the process of analysis, these articles were regarded as articles from the Web of Science to avoid the excessive counting and analysis of articles. Figure 1 shows the search and filtering strategies of publications.

2.2. Data Analysis

For the bibliometric analyses, Microsoft Excel 2020, VOS viewer 1.6.20, CiteSpace 6.3. R1, Scimago Graphica 1.0.46, Hiplot (http://plot.com.cn, accessed on 13 January 2025), Bioinformatics (http://www.Bioinformatics.com.cn, accessed on 15 January 2025), and ChatGLM (http://chatglm.cn, accessed on 5 January 2025) were used. These programs have practical aspects for different analyses.
In this study, VOSviewer 1.6.20 and CiteSpace 6.3.R1 were used to visualize the research results and performance of authors, institutions, countries, and journals in the literature. SCImago Graphica 1.0.46 was used to draw collaborative networks between publishing countries and authors, aiming to reveal development trends. The Hiplot and bioinformatics platform were used to plot the data analyzed in the enrichment analysis. In particular, ChatGLM’s GLM 4 Plus model was used in this study to capture and analyze relevant content. GLM 4 plus model was used to read and analyze the full text of the studies, and capture the research species, research methods, and whether the articles meet the classification as chironomid toxicology research. It is notable that there are conveniences in the analysis using the GLM 4 plus model, but there are also limitations. On the one hand, using large language models can quickly browse a large amount of textual information and capture key information based on preset questions; on the other hand, large language models may misunderstand the captured fragments as key information, even if there are obvious errors in this information in the main text. Therefore, by manually comparing the literature abstracts with the capture results of the GLM 4 plus model, the articles and key information that meet the requirements are selected.

3. Results

3.1. Publication Patterns

Articles related to ‘Toxicological study by using chironomid’ have been searched in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and PubMed. We retrieved 2079 articles from WoSCC and 2168 from PubMed, and 967 duplicate publications were found in both databases. After excluding duplicates, the total number of unique publications was 3280 (Figure 2).
The content was screened to identify toxicology articles using chironomid larvae as experimental materials. After screening, 1815 unrelated articles were excluded. Finally, our study included a total of 1465 publications (Figure 3, Table S1). The earliest publication was “Studies on Embryonic Determination of the Harlequin-Fly, Chironomus dorsalis. II. Effects of Partial Irradiation of The Egg by Ultraviolet Light.”, published in 1964 by YAJIMA, H in Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology. This study exposed Chironomus dorsalis eggs to ultraviolet radiation and described the deformities caused by ultraviolet rays. It is a toxicological article that investigates the impact of physical factors on the morphological changes of species.
The 1465 publications analyzed in this study were authored by 4472 authors from 1330 organizations in 68 countries. Figure 3 shows the overall growth trend of annual and cumulative publications from 1964 to 2024. Since 1998, the number of publications on chironomid toxicology research has been accelerating. In 1999, the number of annual papers entered the triple digits for the first time, reaching 115. In 2009, this number significantly increased to 520 papers, and in 2018, the number of publications exceeded 1000 for the first time. This indicates that there has been significant expansion in the field of chironomid toxicology research in recent years, highlighting the prospects for future development.

3.2. Analysis of Journals

A total of 1465 articles were distributed across 229 journals, revealing a notably imbalanced publication distribution. Approximately 65% of journals published fewer than fifteen articles each, while the ten remaining journals each contributed over twenty publications (detailed in Table 1). The three most productive journals in chironomid toxicological research were Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (183 articles), Science of The Total Environment (127 articles), and Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (111 articles).
Impact Factors (IFs) and journal quartiles were obtained from the 2023 Journal Citation Reports (Web of Science). As a key metric of academic influence, the IF reflects the average number of citations received by a journal’s articles over the preceding two-year period. Among the top fifteen most productive journals in this field (listed in Table 1), the three with the highest IF values were Journal of Hazardous Materials (IF 12.2), Water Research (IF 11.5), and Environmental Science & Technology (IF 10.9). These journals, predominantly classified as Q1, demonstrate concentrated quality distribution and underscore their scholarly authority within the discipline.
The Hirsch index (H index), initially designed to measure individual researchers’ academic impact, is now widely used in bibliometrics to evaluate the influence of journals, institutions, and countries. In this analysis, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry ranked highest with an H index of 41, trailed by Science of The Total Environment and Environmental Pollution, both at 33.
To further assess publication quality, journals were analyzed for Citation Per Paper (CPP) values. The top three journals by CPP were Environmental Science & Technology (38.31), Chemosphere (32.0), and Environmental Pollution (31.74), highlighting their significant academic resonance within the field.

3.3. Countries’ and Authors’ Research Performances and Cooperation

Country contributions were evaluated based on author affiliations listed in published articles, with research performance measured through total publications, independent articles, and collaborative works. As shown in Table 2, the top 15 countries—each contributing at least 40 articles—are ranked by total output. The United States led with 331 publications, followed by China (154) and Canada (153). The annual publication growth analysis revealed the U.S. as the fastest-growing contributor (Figure 4, Table S2). In terms of Citation Per Paper (CPP), Republic of Korea ranked first (31.55), followed by Belgium (31.51) and Spain (31.14), while the United States placed fourth (29.06). The U.S. also dominated the H index rankings with a score of 57, trailed by Canada, Germany, and Spain, each with 37.
To visualize global collaboration patterns in chironomid toxicological research, we graphically mapped international cooperation networks. Figure 5 illustrates the global scope and density of these partnerships within the field. The USA leads in the number of collaborative articles, but in terms of collaboration intensity, it appears more in European countries, with Germany, Portugal, and Spain as the centers of collaboration.
Table 3 ranks the 14 most prolific authors in chironomid toxicological research by publication count. The most numerous are Soares, Amadeu M.V.M and Pestana, Joao L. T. (Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal) with 45 and 32 publications, followed by You, Jing (Jinan University, China) with 29 publications. Regarding citation impact, Morrillo, Gloria (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain) achieved the highest Citation Per Paper (CPP) value of 47.75, reflecting the exceptional recognition of their work. Lydy, Michael J. (Southern Illinois University, USA) and Choi, Jinhee (University of Seoul, Republic of Korea) ranked closely behind, with CPPs of 45.68 and 43.68, respectively. Collaboration patterns among leading authors are illustrated in Figure 6, which maps the cooperative network of the top 24 researchers based on collaboration intensity.

3.4. The Most Cited Articles and High-Impact Articles in 1465 Publications

The citation frequency of an article can reflect the research focus and trends in a specific field. Table 4 shows 15 cited articles out of 1465 publications with at least 140 citations. The analysis of the top fifteen most frequently cited articles shows that there are a maximum of four articles from the United States, with the remaining two articles from South Africa and Australia. In addition, there are four articles from international cooperation: South Africa and Malaysia, Germany and Norway, USA and China, and Netherlands and Bolivia.
As mentioned earlier, the publication with the most citations was “Sinks and sources: Assessing microplastic abundance in river sediment and deposit feeders in an Austral temperate urban river system”, published by Rhodes University in Science of the Total Environment. Since its publication in 2018, it has been cited 343 times. The second most cited publication was “Feeding type and development drive the ingestion of microplastics by freshwater invertebrates”, published by Goethe University Frankfurt in Scientific Reports. Since its publication in 2017, it has been cited 300 times. Both articles evaluated microplastic pollution using Chironomidae. These articles separately tracked the dynamic changes in microplastic pollution in the Bloukrans River system in South Africa during different seasons and the uptake rate of Chironomus riparius exposed to microplastics of different sizes and concentrations. Both focus on the uptake of microplastics by species and explore the impact of environmental factors and species characteristics on microplastic uptake.
However, there are some articles that are equally important, even if they are not cited as frequently. “Biofragmentation of Polystyrene Microplastics: A Silent Process Performed by Chironomus sancticaroli Larvae” was published by Universidade de Sao Paulo in Environmental Science & Technology, the JCR Category Quartile of which is Q1, with a five-year impact factor of 11.7, but it has only been cited 10 times. This article studies the ability of Chironomus sancticaroli to promote the fragmentation of Polystyrene microspheres and the toxic effects of exposure to this polymer. It is the first study to report the ability of chironomid to promote the biofragmentation of microplastics. However, since this article was published on 1 March 2024, it may not have received much attention yet.

3.5. Analysis of Keywords Network

Keywords embody the core and essence of a paper, and co-occurrence analysis of keywords can identify research hotspots in specific scientific fields. 86 keywords mentioned 9 or more times in 1465 publications were selected to create a keyword co-occurrence network (Figure 7). This keyword network illustrates the emergence trend and connection intensity of these keywords of publications related to chironomid toxicology research.
The central terms in the keyword network are Chironomus riparius, Chironomidae, and ecotoxicology. According to the connections between terms, keywords can be divided into four categories: heavy metals (such as cadmium, copper, zinc, etc.), pesticide (such as Chlorpyrifos, Pyrethroids, Atrazine, etc.), insect groups (such as Chironomus riparius, Chironomus riparius, Propsilocerus akamusi, etc.), and stresses types (such as sediment toxicity, oxidative stress, temperature, etc.).These keywords highlight the impact of environmental pollutants and different stress factors on Chironomidae. Therefore, we systematically analyzed 1465 studies on the effects of heavy metals, pesticides, and environmental stress on Chironomidae insects, exploring the toxic mechanisms and physiological responses of different pollutants on insects to further understand the research trends and current status in this field.

4. Discussion

4.1. Analysis of Target Species and Environmental Stressors

In the study of stress on chironomid species, important trends can be seen from the number and distribution of studies on different stress materials. Figure 8 illustrates the number of publications per species and the composition of treatment methods applied to each species (Table S3).
Chironomus riparius, as a common model species, accounts for 38.05% of research and plays a significant role in ecological toxicology and environmental pollution research [58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. Following closely behind are Chironomidae, accounting for 14.08% [65,66,67,68,69,70,71], and Chironomus dilutes [72,73,74,75,76] and Chironomus tentans [77,78,79,80], accounting for 9.14% and 8.76%, respectively, which are widely used in ecological research. Among the top ten species studied, Chironomus spp. have the largest total amount of research. Chironomus spp. is one of the most important functional groups in the soft-bottom communities of freshwater ecosystems [81]. Furthermore, Chironomus riparius, Chironomus dilutes, and Chironomus tentans have been certified by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the OECD as recommended species for toxicology research, which is also the reason for the greater number of publications [54,55].
We categorize the adverse factors on chironomids into heavy metals, inorganic substances (non-heavy metals), pesticides, organic substances (non-pesticides), sediments, biological effects, and physical treatments. Among them, heavy metal and organic matter (non-pesticide) pollution are the most studied stress materials, with heavy metal-related research accounting for 27.16% and organic matter (non-pesticide) research accounting for 26.60%. This indicates that the ecological impact of these two types of pollutants on chironomid species is currently a key research area, possibly due to their widespread presence in aquatic ecosystems and significant impact on the growth and development of aquatic organisms. Heavy metals such as Cu [68,69,82], Hg [83,84], Cd [61,85,86], Pb [87,88], and Zn [89,90] exhibit persistence and bioaccumulation in aquatic environments, while non-pesticide organic compounds include various compounds [59,63,65,74,91]. Among non-pesticide inorganic pollutants, microplastics are becoming a research hotspot. Over the past two decades, hundreds of papers have specifically studied the accumulation of microplastics in the environment, indicating that microplastics have polluted a variety of environments worldwide [92]. The international legally binding instrument on plastic adopted by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) regards microplastics, plastic materials and products, and plastic-related chemicals as key aspects of plastic pollution [93]. Their potential threat to ecosystems is gradually being recognized by the academic community. Applying pesticides is also a common treatment method, and common pesticides such as thiamethoxam (TMX) [94,95,96], fipronil (FIP) [97,98], 2,4-D [99,100], and deltamethrin [101,102,103] are soluble in water, which may have adverse effects on the water body. Excluding heavy metals, the inorganic compounds that are mentioned more frequently include nitrogen-containing compounds [66,71,104] and selenium-containing compounds [105,106,107].
There is limited research on biological effects and physical treatments, and for biological effects, there are only two types of organisms: Vibrio cholerae [108,109,110,111] and Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) [62,112,113,114]. Vibrio cholerae is an aquatic bacterium that can cause large-scale human infectious disease cholera, while Bti is widely used as a microbial insecticide. Vibrio cholerae is a common host of chironomids, and Btis can act as an insecticide and play a role similar to that of organic pesticides. Therefore, the research mainly focuses on these two aspects, while there are relatively few other studies. The common treatment method in physical processing is to change the temperature [115,116,117]. Compared to other studies, Belgica antarctic has appeared more frequently in research on temperature [118,119,120], possibly due to the fact that Belgica antarctica is the only insect species living on the Antarctic Peninsula and its nearby islands. Another common physical treatment method is dehydration, and Polypedilum vanderplanki has received more attention due to its strong dehydration ability, living in arid Africa [121,122,123]. Overall, researchers tend to focus on studying the unique chironomid in extreme environments in physical studies. One possible reason for the relatively small amount of research on physical factors is that more toxicology researchers mainly focus on the reactions between chemical substances and organisms, and thus do not consider physical factors as part of toxicology research.

4.2. Species Response Analysis

The level of attention to changes in chironomids varies in different studies. Figure 9 shows chironomid toxicology at different times. The quantity and composition of publications are shown at the research level (Table S4).
The apparent level is in a relatively advantageous position in each period, followed by the molecular level, and the research on enzyme-level changes is the least. However, with the increase of years, various studies have shown a certain growth trend, with the enzyme level showing the fastest growth rate. The apparent level is widely used in research because its indicators mainly include two parts: population changes and individual structural changes. The population changes led by mortality rate are being used as indicators by more researchers [124,125,126,127], which is easy to statistically analyze; individual structural changes such as head capsule distortion are also significant changes [95,128], which can intuitively reflect the toxicological stress situation. At the molecular level, research focuses more on chromosomal aberrations and Hsp70 [115,129,130,131,132]; enzyme levels tend to be more associated with changes in AChE, SOD, GST, and CAT, which are often related to detoxification functions [133,134,135,136]. Compared with the apparent level, the enzyme level can better understand the changes in species’ response to stress at the microscopic level; however, compared with the molecular research level, it is easier to obtain samples with enzyme levels. Moreover, most of the research indicators of enzyme levels have mature detection methods and standards, allowing researchers to conveniently measure and compare, thus making it easier to obtain reliable data and conclusions. This has promoted the rapid progress of enzyme-level research.

5. Conclusions

Chironomid larvae have become an ideal model organism for toxicology research in freshwater ecosystems due to their wide distribution, short life cycle, strong sensitivity, and ease of laboratory cultivation [137]. The main research subjects include Chironomus riparius (38.05% of the study), Chironomus dilutus (9.14%), and Chironomus tentans (8.76%), which have been certified as standardized test species by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Most research areas focus on the toxic effects of heavy metals (such as cadmium, copper, and zinc, accounting for 27.16%), non-pesticide organic pollutants (such as microplastics and PFAS, accounting for 26.60%), and pesticides (such as thiamethoxam and fipronil) on chironomids, while also paying attention to the impact of extreme environments (such as temperature and dehydration) on their physiological and molecular responses.
The current research still faces some problems; for example, some studies have shown that physiological changes are not as sensitive as molecular changes [138], which may require further research to focus on molecular level changes rather than staying at the individual level, and further research can explore how environmental pollutants affect the toxic mechanisms of chironomids at the molecular level. Future chironomid toxicological experimental research can not only remain at the level of detecting toxicological indicators of environmental pollutants on chironomids, but also utilize molecular biology techniques, such as the CRISPR gene-editing technique, etc. This technique is used to actively explore the interaction mechanism of biological macromolecules of species in the detoxification response. Relevant regulatory organizations or institutions (for example, USEPA or OECD) should also actively update more comprehensive norms in accordance with the latest research progress.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects16060639/s1, Table S1 lists all 1465 publications with metadata such as authors, year, and journal; Table S2 lists the number of publications of the top 15 countries each year; Table S3 statistics the number of publications under different species and different treatment methods; Table S4 lists the number of publications at apparent level, enzyme level, and molecular level each year.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-B.L. and W.-X.P.; software, Z.-M.S. and J.-X.N.; investigation, Z.-M.S. and J.-X.N.; data curation, W.C., W.-X.P. and Z.-M.S.; writing—original draft, W.-B.L., W.-X.P. and W.C.; writing—review and editing, C.-C.Y.; visualization, W.-B.L.; supervision, C.-C.Y.; funding acquisition, C.-C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32370489, 32170473) and Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Science and Technology Correspondent (23KPHDRC00240, 22KPXMRC00070).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xinyu Ge (Tianjin Normal University) for the literature analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. McLachlan, A.; Armitage, P.D.; Cranston, P.S.; Pinder, L.C.V. The Chironomidae: The Biology and Ecology of Non-Biting Midges; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995; Volume 64, p. 667. [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen, T.; Ekrem, T.; Cranston, P. The larvae of the Holarctic Chironomidae (Diptera)-Introduction. Insect Syst. Evol. 2013, 66, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anderson, R.; Buikema, A., Jr.; Cairns, J., Jr. Chironomidae Toxicity Tests—Biological Background and Procedures. In Aquatic Invertebrate Bioassays; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1980; pp. 70–80. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hatakeyama, S. Chronic effects of Cu on reproduction of Polypedilum nubifer (Chironomidae) through water and food. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1988, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Williams, K.A.; Green, D.W.; Pascoe, D.; Gower, D.E. Effect of cadmium on oviposition and egg viability in Chironomus riparius (Diptera: Chironomidae). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1987, 38, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martinez, E.A.; Moore, B.C.; Schaumloffel, J.; Dasgupta, N. Morphological abnormalities in Chironomus tentans exposed to cadmium—And copper-spiked sediments. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2003, 55, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Michailova, P.; Petrova, N.; Ilkova, J.; Bovero, S.; Brunetti, S.; White, K.; Sella, G. Genotoxic effect of copper on salivary gland polytene chromosomes of Chironomus riparius Meigen 1804 (Diptera, Chironomidae). Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ghafarifarsani, H.; Fazle Rohani, M.; Raeeszadeh, M.; Ahani, S.; Yousefi, M.; Talebi, M.; Sazzad Hossain, M. Pesticides and heavy metal toxicity in fish and possible remediation—A review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2024, 24, 1007–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luo, J.; Ye, Y.; Gao, Z.; Wang, W. Essential and nonessential elements in the red-crowned crane Grus japonensis of Zhalong Wetland, northeastern China. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2014, 96, 1096–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malik, D.S.; Maurya, P.K. Heavy metal concentration in water, sediment, and tissues of fish species (Heteropneustis fossilis and Puntius ticto) from Kali River, India. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2014, 96, 1195–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahmed, M.K.; Parvin, E.; Islam, M.M.; Akter, M.S.; Khan, S.; Al-Mamun, M.H. Lead- and cadmium-induced histopathological changes in gill, kidney and liver tissue of freshwater climbing perch Anabas testudineus (Bloch, 1792). Chem. Ecol. 2014, 30, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, M.-H.; Tsunoda, H.; Tsunoda, M. Environmental Toxicology: Biological and Health Effects of Pollutants, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Masindi, V.; Muedi, K. Environmental Contamination by Heavy Metals. In Heavy Metals; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Walker, C.H.; Sibly, R.M.; Sibly, R.M.; Peakall, D.B. Principles of Ecotoxicology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gautam, P.K.; Gautam, R.; Banerjee, S.; Chattopadhyaya, M.; Pandey, J. Heavy metals in the environment: Fate, transport, toxicity and remediation technologies. In Heavy Metals; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 101–130. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metal Toxicity and the Environment. In Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology: Volume 3: Environmental Toxicology; Luch, A., Ed.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012; pp. 133–164. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shallari, S.; Schwartz, C.; Hasko, A.; Morel, J.L. Heavy metals in soils and plants of serpentine and industrial sites of Albania. Sci. Total Environ. 1998, 209, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Herawati, N.; Suzuki, S.; Hayashi, K.; Rivai, I.F.; Koyama, H. Cadmium, Copper, and Zinc Levels in Rice and Soil of Japan, Indonesia, and China by Soil Type. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 64, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. He, Z.L.; Yang, X.E.; Stoffella, P.J. Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 19, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gill, P. Pesticides. Health, Safety and the Environment. By G. A. Matthews. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (2006), pp. 235, £79.50. ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-3091-2. Exp. Agric. 2007, 43, 259–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gilden, R.C.; Huffling, K.; Sattler, B. Pesticides and Health Risks. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2010, 39, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mascarelli, A. Growing up with pesticides. Science 2013, 341, 740–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tudi, M.; Li, H.; Li, H.; Wang, L.; Lyu, J.; Yang, L.; Tong, S.; Yu, Q.J.; Ruan, H.D.; Atabila, A.; et al. Exposure Routes and Health Risks Associated with Pesticide Application. Toxics 2022, 10, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prata, J.C.; da Costa, J.P.; Lopes, I.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T. Environmental exposure to microplastics: An overview on possible human health effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 702, 134455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dris, R.; Gasperi, J.; Mirande, C.; Mandin, C.; Guerrouache, M.; Langlois, V.; Tassin, B. A first overview of textile fibers, including microplastics, in indoor and outdoor environments. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 221, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eriksen, M.; Mason, S.; Wilson, S.; Box, C.; Zellers, A.; Edwards, W.; Farley, H.; Amato, S. Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 77, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Estahbanati, S.; Fahrenfeld, N.L. Influence of wastewater treatment plant discharges on microplastic concentrations in surface water. Chemosphere 2016, 162, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rodrigues, M.O.; Abrantes, N.; Gonçalves, F.J.M.; Nogueira, H.; Marques, J.C.; Gonçalves, A.M.M. Spatial and temporal distribution of microplastics in water and sediments of a freshwater system (Antuã River, Portugal). Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Prata, J.C. Airborne microplastics: Consequences to human health? Environ. Pollut. 2018, 234, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yee, M.S.-L.; Hii, L.-W.; Looi, C.K.; Lim, W.-M.; Wong, S.-F.; Kok, Y.-Y.; Tan, B.-K.; Wong, C.-Y.; Leong, C.-O. Impact of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on Human Health. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Agarwal, D.K.; Kaw, J.L.; Srivastava, S.P.; Seth, P.K. Some biochemical and histopathological changes induced by polyvinyl chloride dust in rat lung. Environ. Res. 1978, 16, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Atis, S.; Tutluoglu, B.; Levent, E.; Ozturk, C.; Tunaci, A.; Sahin, K.; Saral, A.; Oktay, I.; Kanik, A.; Nemery, B. The respiratory effects of occupational polypropylene flock exposure. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 25, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pimentel, J.C.; Avila, R.; Lourenço, A.G. Respiratory disease caused by synthetic fibres: A new occupational disease. Thorax 1975, 30, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, H.; Verbeken, E.; Vanhooren, H.M.; Nemery, B.; Hoet, P.H. Pulmonary toxicity of polyvinyl chloride particles after a single intratracheal instillation in rats. Time course and comparison with silica. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004, 194, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, M.K.; Raknuzzaman, M.; Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M.; Islam, M.K. Heavy metal pollution in surface water and sediment: A preliminary assessment of an urban river in a developing country. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rajeshkumar, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Ravikumar, B.; Bai, G.; Li, X.Y. Studies on seasonal pollution of heavy metals in water, sediment, fish and oyster from the Meiliang Bay of Taihu Lake in China. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 626–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tsang, Y.Y.; Mak, C.W.; Liebich, C.; Lam, S.W.; Sze, E.T.P.; Chan, K.M. Microplastic pollution in the marine waters and sediments of Hong Kong. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 115, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Colborn, T.; Dumanoski, D.; Myers, J.P. Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival?: A Scientific Detective Story; Penguin Group: London, UK, 1998; Volume 29, p. 95. [Google Scholar]
  40. Backhaus, T.; Blanck, H.; Faust, M. Hazard and Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures Under REACH—State of the Art, Gaps and Options for Improvement; Report PM/3 2010; Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate: Sundbyberg, Sweden, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  41. Cedergreen, N. Quantifying Synergy: A Systematic Review of Mixture Toxicity Studies within Environmental Toxicology. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Marcogliese, D.J. Implications of climate change for parasitism of animals in the aquatic environment. Can. J. Zool. 2001, 79, 1331–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kültz, D. Physiological mechanisms used by fish to cope with salinity stress. J. Exp. Biol. 2015, 218, 1907–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Häder, D.P.; Kumar, H.D.; Smith, R.C.; Worrest, R.C. Effects on aquatic ecosystems. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B-Biol. 1998, 46, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lackner, R. “Oxidative stress” in fish by environmental pollutants. In Fish Ecotoxicology; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  46. Scott, G.R.; Sloman, K.A. The effects of environmental pollutants on complex fish behaviour: Integrating behavioural and physiological indicators of toxicity. Aquat. Toxicol. 2004, 68, 369–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Camargo, J.A.; Alonso, A.; Salamanca, A. Nitrate toxicity to aquatic animals: A review with new data for freshwater invertebrates. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 1255–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, P.; Liu, Z.Q.; Wu, D.L.; Chen, M.H.; Lv, W.W.; Zhao, Y.L. Accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in juvenile Eriocheir sinensis and oxidative stress effects in the liver. Aquat. Toxicol. 2018, 200, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Park, K.; Kwak, I.S. Multi-Level Gene Expression in Response to Environmental Stress in Aquatic Invertebrate Chironomids: Potential Applications in Water Quality Monitoring. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Vol 259; DeVoogt, P., Ed.; Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Springer International Publishing Ag: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 259, pp. 77–122. [Google Scholar]
  50. Anderson, T.D.; Jin-Clark, Y.; Begum, K.; Starkey, S.R.; Zhu, K.Y. Gene expression profiling reveals decreased expression of two hemoglobin genes associated with increased consumption of oxygen in Chironomus tentans exposed to atrazine: A possible mechanism for adapting to oxygen deficiency. Aquat. Toxicol. 2008, 86, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aquilino, M.; Sánchez-Argüello, P.; Martínez-Guitarte, J.L. Vinclozolin alters the expression of hormonal and stress genes in the midge Chironomus riparius. Aquat. Toxicol. 2016, 174, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arambourou, H.; Llorente, L.; Moreno-Ocio, I.; Herrero, O.; Barata, C.; Fuertes, I.; Delorme, N.; Méndez-Fernández, L.; Planelló, R. Exposure to heavy metal-contaminated sediments disrupts gene expression, lipid profile, and life history traits in the midge Chironomus riparius. Water Res. 2020, 168, 115–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Arambourou, H.; Planelló, R.; Llorente, L.; Fuertes, I.; Barata, C.; Delorme, N.; Noury, P.; Herrero, O.; Villeneuve, A.; Bonnineau, C. Chironomus riparius exposure to field-collected contaminated sediments: From subcellular effect to whole-organism response. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 671, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ingersoll, C.G.; Ankley, G.T.; Burton, G.A.; Dwyer, F.J.; Hoke, R.A.; Norberg-King, T.J.; Winger, P.V. Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-Associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates; EPA/600/R-94-024; Environmental Protection Agency: Duluth, MN, USA, 1994.
  55. OECD. Test No. 218: Sediment-Water Chironomid Toxicity Using Spiked Sediment, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  56. Pesta, B.; Fuerst, J.; Kirkegaard, E.O.W. Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles. J. Intell. 2018, 6, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tejasen, C. Historical bibliometric analysis: A case of the journal of the siam society, 1972–1976. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rigano, L.; Schmitz, M.; Hollert, H.; Linnemann, V.; Krauss, M.; Pfenninger, M. Mind your tyres: The ecotoxicological impact of urban sediments on an aquatic organism. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 951, 175597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pinto, T.J.; Martínez-Guitarte, J.L.; Dias, M.A.; Montagner, C.C.; Espindola, E.L.; Muñiz-González, A.B. New insights about the toxicity of 2,4-D: Gene expression analysis reveals modulation on several subcellular responses in Chironomus riparius. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2024, 204, 106088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kolbenschlag, S.; Pietz, S.; Roder, N.; Schwenk, K.; Bundschuh, M. Phenotypic adaptation of Chironomus riparius to chronic Bti exposure: Effects on emergence time and nutrient content. Aquat. Toxicol. 2024, 273, 107013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Doria, H.B.; Wagner, V.; Foucault, Q.; Pfenninger, M. Unveiling population-specific outcomes: Examining life cycle traits of different strains of Chironomus riparius exposed to microplastics and cadmium questions generality of ecotoxicological results. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0304739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Manfrin, A.; Mazacotte, G.; Spaak, J.W.; Osakpolor, S.E.; Brühl, C.A.; Lencioni, V.; Kolbenschlag, S.; Schäfer, R.B.; Bundschuh, M.; Schulz, R. Modeling cumulative effects of acute exposure to toxicants on the life cycle of Chironomidae using Bti as a case study. Ecol. Model. 2024, 494, 110768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cardoso, D.N.; Pestana, J.L.T.; Silva, A.R.R.; Campos, D.; Soares, A.; Wrona, F.J.; Loureiro, S. Effects of naturally sourced bitumen samples from Alberta oil sands region (Canada) on aquatic benthic invertebrates: A case study with Chironomus riparius. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 942, 173496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, F.; Wang, H.J.; Dong, W.Y.; Yu, X.H.; Zuo, Z.Q.; Lu, X.; Zhao, Z.L.; Jiang, J.H.; Zhang, X.Y. Enhanced multi-metals stabilization: Synergistic insights from hydroxyapatite and peroxide dosing strategies. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 927, 172159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xu, S.Y.; Zhu, P.F.; Wang, C.Q.; Zhang, D.Y.; Zhang, M.; Pan, X.L. Nanoscale exopolymer reassembly-trap mechanism determines contrasting PFOS exposure patterns in aquatic animals with different feeding habitats: A nano-visualization study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 478, 135515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zohrabi, H.; Chamani, A.; Zamanpoore, M.; Tavabe, K.R. Exploring the interplay between water quality parameters and aquatic fauna in a human-dominated stream network in Iran. Appl. Water Sci. 2024, 14, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Marziali, L.; Pirola, N.; Schiavon, A.; Rossaro, B. Response of Chironomidae (Diptera) to DDT, Mercury, and Arsenic Legacy Pollution in Sediments of the Toce River (Northern Italy). Insects 2024, 15, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, M.C.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, T.G.; Kim, J.W.; Cheon, S.P.; Kim, H.G.; Yu, T.S.; Kwak, I.S. Analysis of environmental factors in sediment based on benthic macroinvertebrates in streams, Korea. Entomol. Res. 2023, 53, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Armstrong, I.; Moir, K.E.; Ridal, J.J.; Cumming, B.F. Subfossil Chironomid Assemblages as Indicators of Remedial Efficacy in the Historically Contaminated St. Lawrence River at Cornwall, Ontario. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2023, 85, 191–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hidayaturrahman, H.; Kwon, H.J.; Bao, Y.M.; Peera, S.G.; Lee, T.G. Assessing the Efficacy of Coagulation (Al3+) and Chlorination in Water Treatment Plant Processes: Inactivating Chironomid Larvae for Improved Tap Water Quality. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Paiva, F.F.; Melo, D.B.D.; Dolbeth, M.; Molozzi, J. Functional threshold responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental stressors in reservoirs. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 329, 116970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, F.; Li, H.Z.; Zhang, X.L.; Hu, H.; Yuan, B.Y.; You, J. Quantitative differentiation of toxicity contributions and predicted global risk of fipronil and its transformation products to aquatic invertebrates. Water Res. 2024, 255, 121461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cupe-Flores, B.; Mendes, M.; Phillips, I.; Panigrahi, B.; Liu, X.; Liber, K. Effects of diluted effluent on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities at the McClean Lake uranium operation in northern Saskatchewan. Environ. Res. 2024, 244, 117951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kadlec, S.M.; Backe, W.J.; Erickson, R.J.; Hockett, J.R.; Howe, S.E.; Mundy, I.D.; Piasecki, E.; Sluka, H.; Votava, L.K.; Mount, D.R. Sublethal Toxicity of 17 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances with Diverse Structures to Ceriodaphnia dubia, Hyalella azteca, and Chironomus dilutus. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2024, 43, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Valenti, T.; Kabler, K.; Dreier, D.; Henry, K.; Jones, A.; McCoole, M.; Cafarella, M.; Collins, J.; Bradley, M.; Samel, A.; et al. Evaluating the Functional Equivalency of Test Organism Performance in Negative and Solvent Controls During Chronic Sediment Ecotoxicity Studies Based on US Environmental Protection Agency Guidance. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2023, 43, 1740–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Aikins, D.M.; Mehler, W.T.; Veilleux, H.D.; Zhang, Y.F.; Goss, G.G. The Acute and Chronic Effects of a Sediment-Bound Synthetic Musk, Galaxolide, on Hyalella azteca, Chironomus dilutus, and Lumbriculus variegatus. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2023, 84, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhou, L.; Wallace, S.M.; Kroll, K.J.; Denslow, N.D.; Gaillard, J.F.; Meyer, P.; Bonzongo, J.C.J. Acute and Chronic Toxicity Testing of Drinking Water Treatment Residuals in Freshwater Systems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2021, 40, 2005–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, L.; Zhou, L.J.; Fan, D.L.; Wang, Z.; Gu, W.; Shi, L.L.; Liu, J.N.; Yang, J.X. Bisphenol P activates hormonal genes and introduces developmental outcomes in Chironomus tentans. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 174, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.N.; Ji, G.X.; Shi, L.L.; Xu, J.; Yang, J.X. Deriving the freshwater quality criteria of BPA, BPF and BPAF for protecting aquatic life. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 164, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Savic-Zdravkovic, D.; Jovanovic, B.; Durdevic, A.; Stojkovie-Piperac, M.; Savic, A.; Vidmar, J.; Milosevic, D. An environmentally relevant concentration of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles induces morphological changes in the mouthparts of Chironomus tentans. Chemosphere 2018, 211, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cummins, K.; Merritt, R. An Introduction to The Aquatic Insects of North America. J. Anim. Ecol. 1996, 15, 401–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pietz, S.; Kainz, M.J.; Schröder, H.; Manfrin, A.; Schäfer, R.B.; Zubrod, J.P.; Bundschuh, M. Metal Exposure and Sex Shape the Fatty Acid Profile of Midges and Reduce the Aquatic Subsidy to Terrestrial Food Webs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 951–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Flanders, J.R.; Long, G.; Reese, B.; Grosso, N.R.; Clements, W.; Stahl, R.G. Assessment of potential mercury toxicity to native invertebrates in a high-gradient stream. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2019, 15, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Vignati, D.A.L.; Bettinetti, R.; Boggero, A.; Valsecchi, S. Testing the Use of Standardized Laboratory Tests to Infer Hg Bioaccumulation in Indigenous Benthic Organisms of Lake Maggiore (NW Italy). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Park, K.; Kwak, I.S. Cadmium-induced developmental alteration and upregulation of serine-type endopeptidase transcripts in wild freshwater populations of Chironomus plumosus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 192, 110240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Doria, H.B.; Hannappel, P.; Pfenninger, M. Whole genome sequencing and RNA-seq evaluation allowed to detect Cd adaptation footprint in Chironomus riparius. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 819, 152843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Van Sprang, P.A.; Nys, C.; Blust, R.J.P.; Chowdhury, J.; Gustafsson, J.P.; Janssen, C.J.; De Schamphelaerez, K.A.C. The Derivation of Effects Threshold Concentrations of Lead for European Freshwater Ecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016, 35, 1310–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Michailova, P.; Ilkova, J.; Petrova, N.; White, K. Rearrangements in the salivary gland chromosomes of Chironomus riparius Mg. (Diptera, Chironomidae) following exposure to lead. Caryologia 2001, 54, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Long, S.M.; Tull, D.L.; Jeppe, K.J.; De Souza, D.P.; Dayalan, S.; Pettigrove, V.J.; McConville, M.J.; Hoffmann, A.A. A multi-platform metabolomics approach demonstrates changes in energy metabolism and the transsulfuration pathway in Chironomus tepperi following exposure to zinc. Aquat. Toxicol. 2015, 162, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Colombo, V.; Pettigrove, V.J.; Hoffmann, A.A.; Golding, L.A. Effects of Lumbriculus variegatus (Annelida, Oligochaete) bioturbation on zinc sediment chemistry and toxicity to the epi-benthic invertebrate Chironomus tepperi (Diptera: Chironomidae). Environ. Pollut. 2016, 216, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Byns, C.; Groffen, T.; Bervoets, L. Aquatic macroinvertebrate community responses to pollution of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Can we define threshold body burdens? Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 917, 170611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Thompson, R.C.; Courtene-Jones, W.; Boucher, J.; Pahl, S.; Raubenheimer, K.; Koelmans, A.A. Twenty years of microplastic pollution research-what have we learned? Science 2024, 386, eadl2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. United Nations Environment Programme(UNEP). Revised Draft Text of the International Legally Binding Instrument on Plastic Pollution, Including in the Marine Environment; United Nations Environment Programme(UNEP): Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  94. Koch, J.; Classen, S.; Gerth, D.; Dallmann, N.; Strauss, T.; Vaugeois, M.; Galic, N. Modeling temperature-dependent life-cycle toxicity of thiamethoxam in Chironomus riparius using a DEB-TKTD model. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 277, 116355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Barbosa, R.S.; Ribeiro, F.; Rotili, E.A.; Venega, R.D.; Dornelas, A.S.P.; Soares, A.; Gravato, C.; Sarmento, R.A. Is Actara® a less toxic neonicotinoid formulation? A multigenerational study using the non-target organism Chironomus xanthus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 93779–93785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Barbosa, R.S.; Ribeiro, F.; Dornelas, A.S.P.; Saraiva, A.D.; Soares, A.; Sarmento, R.A.; Gravato, C. What does not kill it makes it stronger! The tolerance of the F1 larvae of Chironomus xanthus to a neonicotinoid insecticide formulation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 250, 114513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Pinto, T.J.D.; Martínez-Guitarte, J.L.; Dias, M.A.; Montagner, C.C.; Espindola, E.L.G.; Muñíz-González, A.B. Environmentally Relevant Concentrations of the Insecticide Fipronil Modulated Molecular Response in Chironomus riparius. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2024, 43, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Stevens, M.M.; Burdett, A.S.; Mudford, E.M.; Helliwell, S.; Doran, G. The acute toxicity of fipronil to two non-target invertebrates associated with mosquito breeding sites in Australia. Acta Trop. 2011, 117, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Park, K.; Park, J.; Kim, J.; Kwak, I.S. Biological and molecular responses of Chironomus riparius (Diptera, Chironomidae) to herbicide 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C-Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 151, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Freitas, I.B.F.; Duarte-Neto, P.J.; Sorigotto, L.R.; Yoshii, M.P.C.; Lopes, L.F.D.; Pereira, M.M.D.; Girotto, L.; Athayde, D.B.; Goulart, B.V.; Montagner, C.C.; et al. Effects of pasture intensification and sugarcane cultivation on non-target species: A realistic evaluation in pesticide-contaminated mesocosms. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 922, 171425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fan, C.C.; Cui, Z.X.; Yang, T.Y.; Sun, L.L.; Cao, C.W. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase is involved in susceptibility of Chironomus kiiensis Tokunaga, 1936 (Diptera: Chironomidae) to insecticides. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 263, 115353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kunce, W.; Josefsson, S.; Örberg, J.; Johansson, F. Combination effects of pyrethroids and neonicotinoids on development and survival of Chironomus riparius. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 122, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sun, X.Y.; Liu, W.B.; Peng, Y.Y.; Meng, L.F.; Zhang, J.Y.; Pan, Y.H.; Wang, D.Y.; Zhu, J.H.; Wang, C.Y.; Yan, C.C. Genome-wide analyses of Glutathione S-transferase gene family and expression profiling under deltamethrin exposure in non-biting midge Propsilocerus akamusi. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D-Genom. Proteom. 2023, 46, 101081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Luo, Y.X.; Taylor, K.J.; Potito, A.P.; Molloy, K.; Beilman, D.W.; Tang, Y. Ecological impacts of N-deposition in a remote, high-elevation lake in the Three River Headwaters Region, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. J. Paleolimnol. 2023, 69, 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Graves, S.D.; Liber, K.; Palace, V.; Hecker, M.; Doig, L.E.; Janz, D.M. Trophic dynamics of selenium in a boreal lake food web. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 280, 116956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Graves, S.D.; Liber, K.; Palace, V.; Hecker, M.; Doig, L.E.; Janz, D.M. Effects of selenium on benthic macroinvertebrates and fathead minnow (Pimephales promela) in a boreal lake ecosystem. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 182, 109354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Graves, S.D.; Liber, K.; Palace, V.; Hecker, M.; Doig, L.E.; Janz, D.M. Distribution of experimentally added selenium in a boreal lake ecosystem. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 1954–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Zhao, D.S.; Ali, A.; Zuck, C.; Uy, L.; Morris, J.G.M.; Wong, A.C.N. Vibrio cholerae Invasion Dynamics of the Chironomid Host Are Strongly Influenced by Aquatic Cell Density and Can Vary by Strain. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e02652-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lotfi, N.M.; El-Shatoury, S.A.; Hanora, A.; Ahmed, R.S. Isolating non-O1/non-O39 Vibrio cholerae from Chironomus transvaalensis larvae and exuviae collected from polluted areas in Lake Manzala, Egypt. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Raz, N.; Danin-Poleg, Y.; Broza, Y.Y.; Arakawa, E.; Ramakrishna, B.S.; Broza, M.; Kashi, Y. Environmental monitoring of Vibrio cholerae using chironomids in India. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2010, 2, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Broza, M.; Gancz, H.; Halpern, M.; Kashi, Y. Adult non-biting midges: Possible windborne carriers of Vibrio cholerae non-O1 non-O139. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Röder, N.; Stoll, V.S.; Jupke, J.F.; Kolbenschlag, S.; Bundschuh, M.; Theissinger, K.; Schwenk, K. How non-target chironomid communities respond to mosquito control: Integrating DNA metabarcoding and joint species distribution modelling. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 913, 169735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gerstle, V.; Manfrin, A.; Kolbenschlag, S.; Gerken, M.; Ul Islam, A.; Entling, M.H.; Bundschuh, M.; Brühl, C.A. Benthic macroinvertebrate community shifts based on Bti-induced chironomid reduction also decrease Odonata emergence. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316, 120488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Theissinger, K.; Roeder, N.; Allgeier, S.; Beermann, A.J.; Bruehl, C.A.; Friedrich, A.; Michiels, S.; Schwenk, K. Mosquito control actions affect chironomid diversity in temporary wetlands of the Upper Rhine Valley. Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 4300–4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Muñiz-González, A.B.; Martínez-Guitarte, J.L.; Lencioni, V. Impact of Global Warming on Kryal Fauna: Thermal Tolerance Response of Diamesa steinboecki (Goetghebuer, 1933; Chironomidae). Diversity 2023, 15, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Martin-Folgar, R.; de la Fuente, M.; Morcillo, G.; Martínez-Guitarte, J.L. Characterization of six small HSP genes from Chironomus riparius (Diptera, Chironomidae): Differential expression under conditions of normal growth and heat-induced stress. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A-Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2015, 188, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Dickson, T.R.; Walker, I.R. Midge (Diptera: Chironomidae and Ceratopogonidae) emergence responses to temperature: Experiments to assess midges’ capacity as paleotemperature indicators. J. Paleolimnol. 2015, 53, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yoshida, M.; Goto, S.G. Thermal responses of the embryos and early instar larvae of the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica (Insecta: Diptera). Polar Biol. 2023, 46, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ajayi, O.M.; Gantz, J.D.; Finch, G.; Lee, R.E.; Denlinger, D.L.; Benoit, J.B. Rapid stress hardening in the Antarctic midge improves male fertility by increasing courtship success and preventing decline of accessory gland proteins following cold exposure. J. Exp. Biol. 2021, 224, jeb242506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Teets, N.M.; Kawarasaki, Y.; Lee, R.E.; Denlinger, D.L. Expression of genes involved in energy mobilization and osmoprotectant synthesis during thermal and dehydration stress in the Antarctic midge, Belgica antarctica. J. Comp. Physiol. B-Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol. 2013, 183, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ryabova, A.; Mukae, K.; Cherkasov, A.; Cornette, R.; Shagimardanova, E.; Sakashita, T.; Okuda, T.; Kikawada, T.; Gusev, O. Genetic background of enhanced radioresistance in an anhydrobiotic insect: Transcriptional response to ionizing radiations and desiccation. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Benavides-Gordillo, S.; González, A.L.; Kersch-Becker, M.F.; Moretti, M.S.; Moi, D.A.; Aidar, M.P.M.; Romero, G.Q. Warming and shifts in litter quality drive multiple responses in freshwater detritivore communities. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 11137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gusev, O.; Nakahara, Y.; Vanyagina, V.; Malutina, L.; Cornette, R.; Sakashita, T.; Hamada, N.; Kikawada, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Okuda, T. Anhydrobiosis-Associated Nuclear DNA Damage and Repair in the Sleeping Chironomid: Linkage with Radioresistance. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Li, H.Z.; Yi, X.Y.; Chen, F.; Tong, Y.J.; Mehler, W.T.; You, J. Identifying Organic Toxicants in Sediment Using Effect-Directed Analysis: A Combination of Bioaccessibility-Based Extraction and High-Throughput Midge Toxicity Testing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hamidian, A.H.; Zareh, M.; Poorbagher, H.; Vaziri, L.; Ashrafi, S. Heavy metal bioaccumulation in sediment, common reed, algae, and blood worm from the Shoor river, Iran. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2016, 32, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Li, S.B.; Wallis, L.K.; Diamond, S.A.; Ma, H.B.; Hoff, D.J. Species Sensitivity and Dependenceon Exposure Conditions Impacting the Phototoxicity of Tio2 Nanoparticles to Benthic Organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 1563–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Meehan, S.; Shannon, A.; Gruber, B.; Rackl, S.M.; Lucy, F.E. Ecotoxicological impact of Zequanox®, a novel biocide, on selected non-target Irish aquatic species. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 107, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Al-Shami, S.A.; Salmah, M.R.C.; Hassan, A.A.; Azizah, M.N.S. Fluctuating Asymmetry of Chironomus spp. (Diptera: Chironomidae) Larvae in Association with Water Quality and Metal Pollution in Permatang Rawa River in the Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 216, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zheng, X.Y.; Li, Y.Y.; Xu, J.C.; Lu, Y.C. Response of Propsilocerus akamusi (Diptera: Chironomidae) to the leachates from AMD-contaminated sediments: Implications for metal bioremediation of AMD-polluted areas. Aquat. Toxicol. 2024, 266, 106795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lencioni, V.; Grazioli, V.; Rossaro, B.; Bernabò, P. Transcriptional profiling induced by pesticides employed in organic agriculture in a wild population of Chironomus riparius under laboratory conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Michailova, P.; Sella, G.; Petrova, N. Chironomids (Diptera) and their salivary gland chromosomes as indicators of trace-metal genotoxicity. Ital. J. Zool. 2012, 79, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Michailova, P.; Warchalowska-Sliwa, E.; Szarek-Gwiazda, E.; Kownacki, A. Does biodiversity of macroinvertebrates and genome response of Chironomidae larvae (Diptera) reflect heavy metal pollution in a small pond? Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Vrankovic, J.; Bozanic, M.; Zivic, M.; Markovic, Z.; Marjanovic, S.; Golubovic, V.; Zivic, I. Antioxidant biomarker profile of chironomid larvae from carp ponds: Evaluation of the effects of different fish feeding patterns. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 27, 101387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Cao, Y.; Herrero-Nogareda, L.; Cedergreen, N. A comparative study of acetylcholinesterase and general-esterase activity assays using different substrates, in vitro and in vivo exposures and model organisms. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rebechi-Baggio, D.; Richardi, V.S.; Vicentini, M.; Guiloski, I.C.; de Assis, H.C.S.; Navarro-Silva, M.A. Factors that alter the biochemical biomarkers of environmental contamination in Chironomus sancticaroli (Diptera, Chironomidae). Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2016, 60, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Cao, C.W.; Li, X.P.; Ge, S.L.; Sun, L.L.; Wang, Z.Y. Enzymatic activities as potential stress biomarkers of two substituted benzene compounds in Propsilocerus akamusi (Diptera: Chironomidae). Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 2012, 37, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Nel, H.A.; Dalu, T.; Wasserman, R.J. Sinks and sources: Assessing microplastic abundance in river sediment and deposit feeders in an Austral temperate urban river system. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 950–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Lee, S.M.; Lee, S.B.; Park, C.H.; Choi, J. Expression of heat shock protein and hemoglobin genes in Chironomus tentans (Diptera, chironomidae) larvae exposed to various environmental pollutants: A potential biomarker of freshwater monitoring. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 1074–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The flowchart for screening articles from WosCC and PubMed. In the inclusion step stage, articles from two sources are marked and downloaded. The original texts are uploaded to the GLM 4 plus model to extract information. The summaries and the results returned by the GLM 4 plus model are read manually to make the final screening.
Figure 1. The flowchart for screening articles from WosCC and PubMed. In the inclusion step stage, articles from two sources are marked and downloaded. The original texts are uploaded to the GLM 4 plus model to extract information. The summaries and the results returned by the GLM 4 plus model are read manually to make the final screening.
Insects 16 00639 g001
Figure 2. Venn diagram of total articles retrieved from WoSCC and PubMed databases. Venn diagram of total articles retrieved from WoSCC and PubMed databases. The red section represents 2079 articles from WoSCC, the blue section represents 2168 articles from PubMed, and the overlapping area represents the total of 967 duplicated articles.
Figure 2. Venn diagram of total articles retrieved from WoSCC and PubMed databases. Venn diagram of total articles retrieved from WoSCC and PubMed databases. The red section represents 2079 articles from WoSCC, the blue section represents 2168 articles from PubMed, and the overlapping area represents the total of 967 duplicated articles.
Insects 16 00639 g002
Figure 3. Annual publication quantity and growth trend. The bar chart represents the number of newly issued publications each year, while the line chart represents the total cumulative number of publications issued up to the current year.
Figure 3. Annual publication quantity and growth trend. The bar chart represents the number of newly issued publications each year, while the line chart represents the total cumulative number of publications issued up to the current year.
Insects 16 00639 g003
Figure 4. Annual growth of publications in the top 15 countries. Different colored lines represent the total number of publications published by different countries as of the current year.
Figure 4. Annual growth of publications in the top 15 countries. Different colored lines represent the total number of publications published by different countries as of the current year.
Insects 16 00639 g004
Figure 5. Geographic extent of collaborations for research in toxicological study on chironomids. The size of the label indicates the number of publications; the more countries that are involved, the redder the color of the label.
Figure 5. Geographic extent of collaborations for research in toxicological study on chironomids. The size of the label indicates the number of publications; the more countries that are involved, the redder the color of the label.
Insects 16 00639 g005
Figure 6. The collaborative network of the top 24 authors with the highest collaboration intensity. The lines represent the author’s collaborative relationship, with stronger lines indicating greater collaboration strength. The larger the circle size, the more collaborative publications there are. The darker the color, the greater the total link strength.
Figure 6. The collaborative network of the top 24 authors with the highest collaboration intensity. The lines represent the author’s collaborative relationship, with stronger lines indicating greater collaboration strength. The larger the circle size, the more collaborative publications there are. The darker the color, the greater the total link strength.
Insects 16 00639 g006
Figure 7. The co-occurrence map of keywords. The larger the circular node, the higher the frequency of keyword occurrence, and the more it can represent the hotspots in the field. The connecting lines between nodes represent the strength of the association. The thicker the connecting line, the higher the frequency of these two keywords appearing in the same literature.
Figure 7. The co-occurrence map of keywords. The larger the circular node, the higher the frequency of keyword occurrence, and the more it can represent the hotspots in the field. The connecting lines between nodes represent the strength of the association. The thicker the connecting line, the higher the frequency of these two keywords appearing in the same literature.
Insects 16 00639 g007
Figure 8. Species and treatment methods. The inner circle represents different varieties used in the research, with I to XI corresponding to the species groups marked in the legend at the lower right corner; the different colors of the outer circle represent different treatment methods, which are explained in the legend at the upper right corner. The proportion of each area reflects the number of corresponding studies; the larger the proportion area, the more the number of studies.
Figure 8. Species and treatment methods. The inner circle represents different varieties used in the research, with I to XI corresponding to the species groups marked in the legend at the lower right corner; the different colors of the outer circle represent different treatment methods, which are explained in the legend at the upper right corner. The proportion of each area reflects the number of corresponding studies; the larger the proportion area, the more the number of studies.
Insects 16 00639 g008
Figure 9. Changes in research direction over the years. Starting from 2000, every five years are counted as a period, and the entire period before 1999 is counted as a period. The height of the bar chart reflects the number of publications over a certain period of time. The proportions of red, blue, and green parts represent the number of articles related to apparent, enzymatic, and molecular levels, respectively.
Figure 9. Changes in research direction over the years. Starting from 2000, every five years are counted as a period, and the entire period before 1999 is counted as a period. The height of the bar chart reflects the number of publications over a certain period of time. The proportions of red, blue, and green parts represent the number of articles related to apparent, enzymatic, and molecular levels, respectively.
Insects 16 00639 g009
Table 1. The top 15 journals with the most publications, with publisher, number of publications, citations, CPP, h-index, IF, and JIF quarters.
Table 1. The top 15 journals with the most publications, with publisher, number of publications, citations, CPP, h-index, IF, and JIF quarters.
RankJournalPublisherPublicationsCitationsCPPh-IndexIFJIF Quartile
1Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryWILEY183555830.37413.6Q2
2Science of The Total EnvironmentELSEVIER127337926.61338.2Q1
3Ecotoxicology and Environmental SafetyACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE111263123.70296.2Q1
4Environmental PollutionELSEVIER SCI LTD99314231.74337.6Q1
5ChemospherePERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD79252832.00328.1Q1
6Archives of Environmental Contamination And ToxicologySPRINGER68197529.04253.7Q2
7Aquatic ToxicologyELSEVIER58163228.14254.1Q1
8Environmental Science & TechnologyAMER CHEMICAL SOC51195438.312510.9Q1
9Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and ToxicologySPRINGER4269016.43162.7Q3
10Environmental Science and Pollution ResearchSPRINGER HEIDELBERG3552014.86145.8Q1
11EcotoxicologySPRINGER3262819.63142.5Q3
12Environmental Monitoring and AssessmentSPRINGER2127913.29122.9Q3
13Journal of Hazardous MaterialsELSEVIER1933317.531012.2Q1
14Water ResearchPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD1846425.781311.5Q1
15Water Air and Soil PollutionSPRINGER INT PUBL AG1826014.44103.8Q3
Table 2. The top 15 countries and regions with the most publications, with the number of publications, citations, CPP, and H index.
Table 2. The top 15 countries and regions with the most publications, with the number of publications, citations, CPP, and H index.
RankCountryPublicationsCitationsCPPH Index
1USA331961829.0657
2China154300919.5431
3Canada153404526.4437
4Germany130346326.6437
5Portugal95187519.7427
6Spain92286531.1437
7Brazil86106212.3518
8France76181523.8828
9Australia66149322.6222
10Netherlands64181128.3027
11England63158225.1127
12Italy62133121.4726
13Republic of Korea56176731.5526
14Belgium43135531.5126
15Finland4080520.1319
Table 3. The top 14 authors with publications greater than 15, with countries, institution, number of publications, citations, and CPP.
Table 3. The top 14 authors with publications greater than 15, with countries, institution, number of publications, citations, and CPP.
RankAuthorsCountryInstitutionPublicationsCitationsCPP
1Soares, Amadeu M. V. MPortugalUniversidade de Aveiro45107623.91
2Pestana, Joao L. T.PortugalUniversidade de Aveiro3287927.47
3You, JingChinaJinan University2976126.24
4Choi, JinheeRepublic of KoreaUniversity of Seoul28122343.68
5Martinez-Guitarte, Jose-LuisSpainUniversidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia28100135.75
6Liber, KarstenCanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan2884330.11
7Pettigrove, VincentAustraliaUniversity of Melbourne2547719.08
8Lydy, Michael J.USASouthern Illinois University22100545.68
9Morcillo, GloriaSpainUniversidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia2095547.75
10Campos, DianaPortugalUniversidade de Aveiro1739323.12
11Li, HuizhenChinaJinan University1732018.82
12Oehlmann, JoergGermanyGoethe University Frankfurt1749929.35
13Gravato, CarlosPortugalUniversidade de Aveiro1652632.88
14Planello, RosarioSpainUniversidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia1554936.60
Table 4. The top 15 most cited articles include first address country, other participating countries, first address participating institutions, and citations.
Table 4. The top 15 most cited articles include first address country, other participating countries, first address participating institutions, and citations.
RankPublicationFirst Address
Country
Other Participating CountriesFirst Address Participating InstitutionsCitations
1Sinks and sources: Assessing microplastic abundance in river sediment and deposit feeders in an Austral temperate urban river systemSouth AfricaMalaysiaRhodes University343
2Feeding type and development drive the ingestion of microplastics by freshwater invertebratesGermanyNorwayGoethe University Frankfurt300
3Distribution and toxicity of sediment-associated pesticides in agriculture-dominated water bodies of California’s Central ValleyUSAN/AUniversity of California System254
4Environmentally relevant concentrations of polyethylene microplastics negatively impact the survival, growth and emergence of sediment-dwelling invertebratesAustraliaN/AGriffith University214
5Waterborne and sediment toxicity of fluoxetine to select organismsUSAN/ABaylor University188
6Fluctuating asymmetry of invertebrate populations as a biological indicator of environmental quality.AustraliaN/ACSIRO Division of Entomology181
7Anthropogenic impacts on the distribution and biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality of the Langat River, Peninsular MalaysiaMalaysiaN/AUniversiti Putra Malaysia176
8Partitioning, bioavailability, and toxicity of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin in sedimentsEnglandN/ASyngenta174
9Mechanism allowing an insect to survive complete dehydration and extreme temperaturesJapanN/ANational Institute of Agrobiological Sciences-Japan167
10Impact of atrazine on organophosphate insecticide toxicityUSAN/AWichita State University159
11Expression of heat shock protein and hemoglobin genes in Chironomus tentans (Diptera, Chironomidae) larvae exposed to various environmental pollutants: A potential biomarker of freshwater monitoringRepublic of KoreaN/AUniversity of Seoul152
12Effectiveness of a constructed wetland for retention of nonpoint-source pesticide pollution in the Lourens River catchment, South AfricaSouth AfricaN/AStellenbosch University145
13Temperature as a toxicity identification evaluation tool for pyrethroidUSAChinaSouthern Illinois University System144
14Effects of mining activities on heavy metal concentrations in water, sediment, and macroinvertebrates in different reaches of the Pilcomayo River, South AmericaNetherlandsBoliviaRadboud University Nijmegen143
15Bridging levels of pharmaceuticals in river water with biological community structure in the Llobregat river basin (Northeast Spain)SpainN/AUniversity of Barcelona143
N/A: Not applicable. There are no other participating countries here.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.-B.; Pei, W.-X.; Shao, Z.-M.; Nie, J.-X.; Cao, W.; Yan, C.-C. Trends and Emerging Hotspots in Toxicology of Chironomids: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Insects 2025, 16, 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060639

AMA Style

Liu W-B, Pei W-X, Shao Z-M, Nie J-X, Cao W, Yan C-C. Trends and Emerging Hotspots in Toxicology of Chironomids: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Insects. 2025; 16(6):639. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060639

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Wen-Bin, Wen-Xuan Pei, Zi-Ming Shao, Jia-Xin Nie, Wei Cao, and Chun-Cai Yan. 2025. "Trends and Emerging Hotspots in Toxicology of Chironomids: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis" Insects 16, no. 6: 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060639

APA Style

Liu, W.-B., Pei, W.-X., Shao, Z.-M., Nie, J.-X., Cao, W., & Yan, C.-C. (2025). Trends and Emerging Hotspots in Toxicology of Chironomids: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Insects, 16(6), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060639

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop