Next Article in Journal
Physiological Status of Rice Leaf-Roller Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Adults Trapped by Sex Pheromone and Floral Odor
Previous Article in Journal
The Growth Performance and Nutrient Composition of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Larvae Fed Slaughtered Bovine Blood
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/insects15090636
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Genus and Species of Webspinners (Insecta: Embioptera) from the Mid-Cretaceous of Myanmar with a Catalog of Fossil Members

by
Siting Liu
1,
Zihao Peng
1,
Chaofan Shi
2,*,
Dong Ren
3 and
Qiang Yang
1,*
1
School of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Conservation and Application in Biodiversity of South China, Guangzhou University, #230 Waihuanxi Road, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
3
College of Life Sciences and Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies, Capital Normal University, Xisanhuanbeilu 105, Haidian District, Beijing 100048, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(9), 636; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090636
Submission received: 17 July 2024 / Revised: 15 August 2024 / Accepted: 17 August 2024 / Published: 25 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Simple Summary

There is an ongoing ambiguity surrounding the phylogenetic relationships of Embioptera, but fossil evidence can provide substantial information for phylogenetic analysis. Webspinners possess a potentially rich diversity within Cretaceous Myanmar amber. One new genus and three new species are described here and classified into the families Clothodidae and Scelembiidae. A comparison between extant and extinct species of the Clothodidae revealed that the non-cracking of the male tenth abdominal tergum, rather than hemitergites, may be a plesiomorphy. Additionally, the structure of the ocelli is increasingly found in fossil groups. These findings provide significant materials for studying the early evolution of Embioptera and understanding its morphology.

Abstract

One new genus (Ocrognethoda gen. nov.) and three new species of webspinners (Ocrognethoda olivea gen. et sp. nov., Gnethoda lata sp. nov. and Parasorellembia hamata sp. nov.) are described from the Upper Cretaceous of Myanmar amber. Ocrognethoda olivea gen. et sp. nov. and Gnethoda lata sp. nov. are attributed to the family Clothodidae due to their simplified and symmetrical male terminalia, in which the tenth tergum is undivided. Parasorellembia hamata sp. nov. is classified in the family Scelembiidae by a specialized abdominal apex: fused cerci, a broad right hemitergite of the tenth abdominal tergite, and ocelli presence. Moreover, based on the discovery of new genus and species, the male terminalia of Clothodidae and Sorellembiinae are briefly discussed.

1. Introduction

Embioptera are a group that use their front feet to produce nanoscale silk for building shelters [1]. Usually, the silken galleries are constructed on trees or rocks, or amid leaf litter [2]. When confronted with noxious stimuli, webspinners are more inclined toward reverse movement [3]. The greatly enlarged femora of the hind legs are adapted to running backwards [2], and plenty of long setae in their sensitive cerci make them agile when engaging in backward movement [4].
So far, more than 400 extant webspinners and 28 fossil webspinners have been reported [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] (Table 1). The earliest fossil record of the webspinner dates back to the Permian–Triassic; they are considered to be the ancestors of the extant webspinners [8]. However, the specimens of this period only retain the structure of wings, and we lack knowledge of the body structure. Meanwhile, there are different views on whether two species—Sinembia rossi Huang and Nel, 2009 and Juraembia ningchengensis Huang and Nel, 2009—found in Inner Mongolia should be classified as Embioptera; Engel et al. suggested that they should be excluded from the order [21,24]. In recent years, as Myanmar amber has received much attention, 12 species of webspinners have been reported [11,12,13,14,15,21,22], and the family Clothodidae has the highest species richness.
Though the reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships of Embioptera have been studied by some authors [25,26,27,28], the basal relationship of this taxon remains unclear. Most of the above phylogenetic studies are based on extant species and fossil members are rarely included, but fossil taxa may play an important role in reconstructing phylogenetic relationships in embiids [21]. Also, focusing on structures related to their lifestyle can provide useful phylogenetic information about several groups and sections of the tree [29].
Herein, we report one new genus and three new species from the Upper Cretaceous of northern Myanmar. The description of the new species can not only enrich the species record of the embiids but can also provide more material for clarifying the phylogenetic relationships.

2. Materials and Methods

This study is based on three specimens from Myanmar amber. The amber pieces were collected from the Hukawng Valley (the state of Kachin in northern Myanmar). The map of the Hukawng Valley was provided by Grimaldi et al. [30]. The volcaniclastic matrix of the amber is estimated to be approximately 98.79 ± 0.62 Ma, i.e., the earliest Cenomanian, near the Albian/Cenomanian (Early/Late Cretaceous) boundary [31]. The biological inclusions of Myanmar amber represent a sample of a tropical forest community in equatorial southeastern Asia at an approximately 12°N paleolatitude [30,32,33,34,35,36]. The specimens were permanently deposited in the collections of the Key Laboratory of Insect Evolution and Environmental Changes, College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China (CNUB; Dong Ren, Curator).
The specimens were examined using a Zeiss Discovery V20 stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkohen, Germany) and a Nikon SMZ1270 stereomicroscope (Nikon corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and photographed separately with an AxioCam HRc camera and an iMG SC600C digital camera attached to the Zeiss Discovery V20 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkohen, Germany) and Nikon SMZ1270 stereomicroscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The figures were processed using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.
The morphological terminology in general follows Ross [2] and Engel et al. [21]. Abbreviations: A, analis; C, costa; CuA, anterior cubitus; CuP, posterior cubitus; MA, anterior media; MP, posterior media; R, radius; Rs, radial sector; Sc, subcostal. 10L, left hemitergite of tenth abdominal tergite; 10R, right hemitergite of tenth abdominal tergite; H, hypandrium; HP, hypandrial process; LC1, left basal cercomere; LC2, left apical cercomere; RC1, right basal cercomere; RC2, right apical cercomere; 10LP, left tergal process of tenth abdominal tergite; 10RP, right tergal process of tenth abdominal tergite; LPPT, process of left paraproct; and EP, epiproct.

3. Results

Systematic Palaeontology

Order Embioptera Lameere, 1900.
Family Clothodidae Enderlein, 1909.
Subfamily Gnethodinae Cui and Engel, 2020.
Genus Ocrognethoda Liu, Shi, Ren and Yang gen. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:169BA2D5-D758-40B1-8A55-C5A4D48670C5
Type species. Ocrognethoda olivea Liu, Shi, Ren and Yang gen. et sp. nov.
Etymology. The generic name is a combination of the Greek ocr- (meaning “ridge”) and Gnethoda (the type genus of the family), referring to the middle of the caudal margin protruding in the tenth abdominal tergum. The gender is feminine.
Diagnosis. Elongated head; two plantulae (medial and apical plantulae) in hind metabasitarsus; tenth abdominal tergum with the middle of caudal margin protruded; hypandrium large, hypandrial process curved to the left; cerci nearly symmetrical, consist of two spindle segments; forewing with Sc terminating on anterior wing margin near basal two-fifths of wing length and connecting with anterior wing margin; MA not forked; CuA simple with one cua-cup crossvein; hind wing with CuA forked into CuA1 and CuA2.
Remarks. This genus can be assigned to the Clothodidae because of the following features: (1) symmetrical terminalia; (2) cylindrical cerci with two segments; and (3) tenth tergum is undivided. It can be classified as Gnethodinae because (1) forewing with MA and CuA simple; (2) metabasitarsus with medial and apical plantulae on ventral surface; and (3) left and right cerci identical and dimerous.
The new genus differs from other genera of this family by following characters: (1) forewing with MA not forked (MA forked in Atmetoclothoda Engel and Huang, 2016 and Henoclothoda Cui and Engel, 2020); (2) forewing with one cua-cup crossvein (no cua-cup crossvein present in Genethoda Cui and Engel, 2020); and (3) almost all longitudinal veins reaching wing margin (almost all longitudinal veins not reaching wing margin in Perissoclothoda Chen and Zhang, 2023).
Ocrognethoda olivea Liu, Shi, Ren and Yang gen. et sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6D6B055F-CCB3-46E4-BC0C-D060CEC90B32
Figure 1.
Material. Holotype: CNU-EMB-MA2019024.
Etymology. The specific name is from the Latin olivea (meaning olive-shaped), referring to the olive-shaped head. The gender is feminine.
Locality and horizon. Hukawng Valley, Kachin State, northern Myanmar; lowermost Cenomanian, Upper Cretaceous.
Diagnosis. The same as for the genus.
Description. Male. Exoskeleton generally brown, with head dark-brown (Figure 1A). Body: total length (excluding wings, antennae, and cerci) ca. 5.70 mm. Head length (to apex of labrum) ca. 0.97 mm and width (just posterior to compound eyes) ca. 0.43 mm; compound eyes well-developed and prominent; labial palpus with three palpomeres, third palpomere longest; maxillary palpus with five palpomeres, apical palpomere longest; antenna preserved well, total length 3.43 mm with 12 flagellomeres—each flagellomeres with intensive setae, scape slightly longer than pedicel, and they are both longer than wide, first flagellomere length about five times as long as width, second to fourth flagellomeres length about three times as long as width, fifth through twelfth flagellomeres length about four times as long as width. Right pedicel and the last two flagellomeres yellow, other antennomeres dark brown. Pronotum length ca. 0.68 mm, width ca. 0.32 mm; anterolateral angles orthogonal; anterior margin weakly concave; posterior margin rounded; division into pro- and metazones distinct. Probasitarsus (first tarsal segment of fore leg) widened, with a length about three times as long as width (about 0.57 mm × 0.19 mm). Hind femora moderately widened; metabasitarsus (first tarsal segment of hind leg) with two plantulae (Figure 1B) located at the middle and apex of the segment; second tarsomere with one plantula. All claws simple and symmetrical, arolia absent. The ventral and dorsal plates of the abdomen cuticularized, and the margin of abdomen covered with elongated setae.
Terminalia (Figure 1C–F) nearly symmetrical; tenth abdominal tergum not divided into hemitergites, with the middle of caudal margin angularly protruded; hypandrial process (HP) broad and prominent, slightly sloping to the left; cerci nearly symmetrical, consisting of two spindle segments with abundant slender setae. Left basal cercal (LC1) length: ca. 0.34 mm, width: ca. 0.04 mm; left apical cercal (LC2) length: ca. 0.33 mm, width: ca. 0.04 mm; right basal cercal (RC1) length: ca. 0.33 mm, width ca. 0.08 mm; and right apical cercal (RC2) length: ca. 0.27 mm, width length: ca. 0.06 mm.
Forewing (Figure 1G): length ca. 4.65 mm, width ca. 1.21 mm, wings hyaline. Sc terminates on the anterior wing margin near the basal two-fifths of wing length and connects with anterior wing margin; R strong, connected with anterior wing margin, slightly procurved at the apex, with one faint r-rs+ma crossvein present in basal quarter of wing; Rs and MA separate near wing midlength; Rs simple, terminating on anterior wing margin apex, with four r-rs crossveins present in apical half of wing (three r-rs crossveins present and Rs bifurcate near wing apex in right forewing); MA simple, terminating at wing apex, with two rs-ma crossveins; MP simple, terminating on posterior wing margin, with three ma-mp crossveins (two ma-mp crossveins present in right forewing); CuA simple, terminating on posterior wing margin apical one-third of wing length, with two mp-cua crossveins, one present at anal area near the fork of CuA and CuP and the other present in apical one-third of wing length; CuP simple, terminating nearly at the wing midlength, with one cua-cup crossvein; A short and simple, not connected with posterior wing margin.
Hind wing (Figure 1G): length ca. 3.31 mm, width ca. 1.16 mm, wings hyaline. Sc terminates on the wing margin near the basal one-third of the wing length; R strong, connected with anterior wing margin, slightly procurved at the apex; Rs simple, terminating on anterior wing margin apex; three r-rs crossveins present in apical half of wing; MA simple, terminating at wing apex, with two rs-ma crossveins (three rs-ma crossveins present in left hind wing); MP simple, terminating on posterior wing margin, with one ma-mp crossvein (two ma-mp crossveins present in left hind wing); CuA divided into two branches at one-third of the wing length, with CuA1 terminating on posterior wing margin midlength and CuA2 terminating on posterior wing margin near the basal one-third of wing length; CuP simple, terminating on posterior wing margin near the basal one-fourth of wing length; and A simple, not connected with the posterior wing margin.
Insects 15 00636 g001
Figure 1. Ocrognethoda olivea gen. et sp. nov., holotype (CNU-EMB-MA2019024). (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) tarsus of right hind leg, ventral view; (C) photograph of male genitalia in dorsal view and (D) ventral view; (E) line drawing of male genitalia in dorsal view and (F) ventral view; (G) line drawing of wings, left forewing (LFW), right forewing (RFW), left hind wing (LHW), right hind wing (RHW). Scale bars: (A,G) 1 mm, (B–F) 0.5 mm.
Figure 1. Ocrognethoda olivea gen. et sp. nov., holotype (CNU-EMB-MA2019024). (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) tarsus of right hind leg, ventral view; (C) photograph of male genitalia in dorsal view and (D) ventral view; (E) line drawing of male genitalia in dorsal view and (F) ventral view; (G) line drawing of wings, left forewing (LFW), right forewing (RFW), left hind wing (LHW), right hind wing (RHW). Scale bars: (A,G) 1 mm, (B–F) 0.5 mm.
Insects 15 00636 g001
Genus Gnethoda Cui and Engel, 2020.
Type species. Gnethoda symmetrica Cui and Engel, 2020.
Gnethoda lata Liu, Shi, Ren and Yang sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:97EFB9D6-CF31-423C-A31E-ECBB5867F340
Figure 2.
Material. Holotype: CNU-EMB-MA2019022.
Etymology. The specific name is taken from the Latin lata (meaning “broad”) and refers to the broad pronotum. The gender is feminine.
Locality and horizon. Hukawng Valley, Kachin State, northern Myanmar; lowermost Cenomanian, Upper Cretaceous.
Diagnosis. Head length slightly longer than width, with ocelli present, dorsal side with Y-shaped sutura and postocular carinae; ventral bridge absent; metabasitarsus with two plantulae; cerci nearly symmetrical, consist of two segments. Forewing with MA and CuA simple; three r-rs crossveins, one rs+ma-mp crossvein, and two mp-cua crossveins in the midlength of the wing.
Description. Male. Integument generally dark brown (Figure 2). Head oval-shaped, length (to apex of labrum) ca. 0.97 mm, width (just posterior to compound eyes) ca. 0.74 mm; compound eyes well-developed and prominent; a pair of lateral ocelli located below the inner margin of compound eyes, median dorsal ocellus positioned in the middle between the two compound eyes (Figure 2B); ventral bridge absent (Figure 2C,D); labial palpus with three palpomeres, third palpomere longest; maxillary palpus with five palpomeres, first to third palpomeres of equal length, apical palpomere longest; antenna preserved well, total length ca. 3.54 mm with 14 flagellomeres, each flagellomere with intensive, long setae, scape longer than pedicel, and they are both longer than wide, first flagellomere length about three times as long as width, second to third flagellomeres length about two times as long as width, fourth through fourteenth flagellomeres length about 3.5 times as long as width. Pronotum length ca. 0.52 mm, width ca. 0.62 mm; anterolateral angles rounded; anterior margin weakly concave; posterior margin rounded; division into pro- and metazones distinct. Probasitarsus widened, length about three times as long as width (about 0.54 mm × 0.18 mm). Hind femora moderately widened; metabasitarsus with two plantulae (Figure 2E): located at the middle and apex of the segment; second tarsomere with one plantula. All claws simple and symmetrical, arolia absent. The abdominal structure not intact, but cerci visible. Cerci (Figure 2E) nearly symmetrical, consisting of two cylindrical segments with slender setae. LC1 width: ca. 0.12 mm; LC2 length: ca. 0.28 mm, width: ca. 0.08 mm; RC1 width ca. 0.11 mm; and RC2 length: ca. 0.26 mm, width: ca. 0.06 mm.
Forewing (Figure 2F): length ca. 4.30 mm, width ca. 1.23 mm, wings hyaline; Sc terminating near the basal two-fifths of the wing length, not connected with the anterior wing margin; R strong, connected with the anterior wing margin, with one r-rs+ma crossvein present in the basal one-sixth of the wing; Rs and MA separating at the apical two-fifths of the wing length; Rs simple, terminating on anterior wing margin, with three r-rs crossveins present in apical half of wing; MA simple, terminating on wing apex, with two rs-ma crossveins; MP simple, terminating on posterior wing margin, with one ma-mp crossvein in apical one-fourth of wing and one rs+ma-mp crossvein in one half of wing; CuA simple, terminating on posterior wing margin in the apical one-third of wing length, with three mp-cua crossveins—one present at anal area near the fork of CuA and CuP, and the others present in midlength of wing; CuP simple, terminating on posterior wing margin in the basal one-third of wing length; A short and simple, connected with posterior wing margin.
Hind wing (Figure 2G): length ca. 3.60 mm, width ca. 1.16 mm, wings hyaline; Sc terminating on the wing margin near the basal two-fifths of the wing length, not connected with anterior wing margin; R strong, connected with anterior wing margin; Rs simple, terminating on the anterior wing apex, with three r-rs crossveins present in the apical half of wing; MA simple, terminating at wing apex, with two rs-ma crossveins; MP simple, terminating on posterior wing margin, with two ma-mp crossveins; CuA simple, terminating on posterior wing margin apical one-half of the wing length, with one mp-cua crossvein present in midlength of wing; CuP simple, terminating on posterior wing margin near the basal one-third of wing length; A simple, not connected with posterior wing margin.
Remarks. This species can be assigned to the Genethoda Cui and Engel, 2020, due to the following features: (1) cylindrical cerci with two segments; (2) MA, MP, CuA and CuP all not forked; (3) ma-mp crossveins present; (4) CuA elongate, terminating on posterior wing margin apical one-third of wing length.
The new species are distinguished from other species by the number of r-rs crossveins and rs+ma-mp crossveins in the forewing: (1) G. lata sp. nov. with three r-rs crossveins; Genethoda symmetrica Cui and Engel, 2020, Genethoda ancyla Cui and Engel, 2020, and Genethoda putshkovi Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022, with four r-rs crossveins; and Genethoda odntophora Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022, with four to five r-rs crossveins. (2) G. lata sp. nov. with one rs+ma-mp crossvein, but no rs+ma-mp crossvein present in other species of the genus.
Due to the intact state of preservation of the specimen, the ocelli and Y-shaped sulcus are determined. G. lata sp. nov. could be clearly observed to have three ocelli, which echo the structure of the suspected ocelli in G. putshkovi Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022. We adhere to the diagnosis of genus given by Cui et al. [12] with a single correction: ocelli absent or present.
Insects 15 00636 g002
Figure 2. Gnethoda lata sp. nov., holotype (CNU-EMB-MA2019022). (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) photograph of head in dorsal view and (C) ventral view; (D) line drawing of head in ventral view; (E) tarsus of hind leg and broken cerci, dorsal view; (F) line drawing of right forewing; (G) line drawing of left hind wing. Scale bars: (A) 1 mm, (B–G) 0.5 mm.
Figure 2. Gnethoda lata sp. nov., holotype (CNU-EMB-MA2019022). (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) photograph of head in dorsal view and (C) ventral view; (D) line drawing of head in ventral view; (E) tarsus of hind leg and broken cerci, dorsal view; (F) line drawing of right forewing; (G) line drawing of left hind wing. Scale bars: (A) 1 mm, (B–G) 0.5 mm.
Insects 15 00636 g002
Family Scelembiidae Ross, 2001.
Subfamily Sorellembiinae Engel and Grimaldi, 2016.
Genus Parasorellembia Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022.
Type species. Parasorellembia groehni Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022.
Parasorellembia hamata Liu, Shi, Ren and Yang sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F73356BB-94C3-4870-BC68-EC998E177CDF
Figure 3.
Material. Holotype: CNU-EMB-MA2019023.
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the Latin hamata (meaning “hooked”), in reference to HP with an upward hook in apical. The gender is feminine.
Locality and horizon. Hukawng Valley, Kachin State, northern Myanmar; lower-most Cenomanian, Upper Cretaceous.
Diagnosis. Ocelli present; terminalia strongly asymmetrical; the left cercus fused and curved, right cercus robust, apically, with a curved, long and thin outgrowth; H large, and HP with an upward hook in the apical; forewing with MA unforked, four r-rs crossveins, one mp-cua crossvein and two cu-a crossveins.
Description. Male. Integument brown overall (Figure 3A). Body total length (excluding wings, antennae, and cerci) ca. 5.60 mm. Head oval-shaped, length (to apex of labrum) ca. 1.02 mm, width (just posterior to compound eyes) ca. 0.66 mm, vertex pale; compound eyes well developed, prominent, a pair of lateral ocelli located at the inner margin of compound eyes, median dorsal ocellus located behind epistomal suture (Figure 3B); anterior edge of the labrum is rounded, labial palpus with three palpomeres—equal lengths for first and second palpomeres, third palpomere longest; maxillary palpus with five palpomeres, first to second palpomeres of equal length, third and fourth palpomeres longer than before, apical palpomere longest; antenna preserved well, total length ca. 2.90 mm with 12 flagellomeres—each flagellomere with intensive, long setae scape and pedicel of equal length, first flagellomere length about four times as long as width, second to fourth flagellomeres length about two times as long as width, and the fifth through twelfth flagellomeres length about 3.5 times as long as width. Pronotum length ca. 0.55 mm, width ca. 0.46 mm; anterolateral angles orthogonal; anterior margin weakly concave; posterior margin orthogonal; division into pro- and metazones distinct. Probasitarsus widened, length about 2.5 times as long as width (about 0.53 mm × 0.20 mm). Hind femora moderately widened, metabasitarsus with two plantulae (Figure 3C) located at the middle and apex of the segment; second tarsomere with one plantula. All claws simple and symmetrical, arolia absent. The ventral and dorsal plates of the abdomen cuticularized, and the margin of abdomen distributed with elongated setae. Terminalia (Figure 3D–F) asymmetrical; tenth abdominal tergum divided into left and right hemitergites (but the boundary between the two hemitergites indistinguishable due to the occlusion of the wings); a slender sclerite plate in the middle of the tenth abdominal tergite (may be 10LP); a large sclerite (10R) nearly cover over the right cercus; an upward hook at the end of HP; the left cercus fused and curved, length ca. 0.85 mm, width ca. 0.10 mm; right cercus robust, apically with a curved, long and thin outgrowth.
Forewing (Figure 3G): length ca. 4.80 mm, width ca. 1.39 mm, wings hyaline; Sc terminating near the basal two-fifths of wing length, not connected with anterior wing margin; R strong, connected with anterior wing margin, with one r-rs+ma crossvein present in basal one-fifth of wing; Rs and MA separating nearly one half of wing length; Rs simple, terminating on anterior wing margin, with four or five r-rs crossveins present in apical half of wing; MA simple, terminating on wing apex, with one rs-ma crossvein; MP simple, terminating on posterior wing margin, with two ma-mp crossveins; CuA simple, terminating on the posterior wing margin in the apical two-fifths of wing length, with one mp-cua crossvein and one mp-cu crossvein present in basal one-fifth of the wing; CuP simple, terminating on the posterior wing margin basal three-sevenths of the wing length; and A simple, not connected with the posterior wing margin, with two cu-a crossveins present in the basal of the wing.
Remarks. This species can be assigned to Parasorellembia Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022, because of the following characteristics: (1) ocelli present; (2) forewing with MA not forked (MA forked in Sorellembia Engel and Grimaldi, 2006, Kumarembia Engel and Grimaldi, 2011 and Multivena Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022); (3) terminalia strongly asymmetrical; and (4) left cercus with single elongated segment (left cercus with two segments in Sorellembia Engel and Grimaldi, 2006 and Kumarembia Engel and Grimaldi, 2011), right cercus robust (considered to be 10RP in P. groehni Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022).
The new species can be distinguished from P. groehni Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022, by following characters: (1) forewing with four r-rs crossveins (forewing with three r-rs crossveins in P. groehni); (2) forewing with one mp-cua crossvein (forewing with no mp-cua crossvein in P. groehni); (3) forewing with two cu-a crossveins (forewing with no cu-a crossvein in P. groehni); and (4) HP with an upward hook in the apical area (HP slightly curved and sickle-shaped in P. groehni).
Insects 15 00636 g003
Figure 3. Parasorellembia hamata sp. nov., holotype (CNU-EMB-MA2019023). (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) photograph of head in dorsal view and (C) tarsus of left hind leg in ventral view; (D) photograph of male genitalia in dorsal view and (E) ventral view; (F) line drawing of male genitalia in ventral view; (G) line drawing of left forewing. Scale bars: (A,G) 1 mm, (B–F) 0.5 mm.
Figure 3. Parasorellembia hamata sp. nov., holotype (CNU-EMB-MA2019023). (A) Habitus, dorsal view; (B) photograph of head in dorsal view and (C) tarsus of left hind leg in ventral view; (D) photograph of male genitalia in dorsal view and (E) ventral view; (F) line drawing of male genitalia in ventral view; (G) line drawing of left forewing. Scale bars: (A,G) 1 mm, (B–F) 0.5 mm.
Insects 15 00636 g003

4. Discussion

Until now, 12 fossil webspinner species have been reported from the Cretaceous, of which seven are grouped in Clothodidae, and all of these are found in the Hukawng Valley of northern Myanmar. It is inferred that Clothodidae exhibited high species richness and diversity in the Upper Cretaceous.
In the fossil record of Clothodidae, the tenth abdominal tergum neither divided into hemitergites, nor was it cleft or medially emarginated. However, extant species mostly medially emarginate, such as Clothoda longicauda Ross, 1987; even the tenth abdominal tergum is almost completely divided into hemitergites, such as Clothoda aequicercata (Enderlein, 1912) [37]. Therefore, it is speculated that the non-cracking of the tenth abdominal tergum may be the plesiomorphy of Clothodidae, and the characteristics of the cracking have gradually evolved.
The absence of a right cercus is an important feature of the subfamily Sorellembiinae, but the first reported species, Sorellembia estherae Engel and Grimaldi, 2006, has incompletely preserved terminalia [22]. P. groehni Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022, leaves the possibility of explaining the structure as a large right cercus because the right outgrowth is separated from the tenth tergite [14]. In P. hamata sp. nov., a hemitergite is present over the “right outgrowth”; it should be the right cercus. So, it is possible that the Sorellembiinae have cerci, and due to previous specimens not being well-preserved, this makes them undetectable.
All extant webspinners have no ocelli [2,22]. However, Anisyutkin and Perkovsky first described the presence of ocelli in P. groehni Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022 [14]. Subsequently, in this study, ocelli are clearly observed in P. hamata sp. nov. and G. lata sp. nov. Additionally, after re-examining Gnethoda odontuphora Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022 (Figure 4), and checking the figures of Atmetoclothoda orthotenes Engel and Huang, 2016 and Litoclostes delicatus Engel and Huang, 2016 [11], we also detected the presence of ocelli. It is inferred that a certain number of webspinners had ocelli in the Cretaceous. The discovery of this structure can provide materials for the evolution of ocelli in embiids and may provide an important basis for further exploring its adaptation to the habitat.

5. Conclusions

One new genus and three new species are described from the Upper Cretaceous. Ocrognethoda olivea gen. et sp. nov. and Gnethoda lata sp. nov. are classified in Clothodidae and Parasorellembia hamata sp. nov. is classified in Scelembiidae. The description of the new species increases the diversity of embiids in the Mesozoic. The catalogue of fossil members indicates that the Cretaceous webspinners have the highest species diversity, especially Clothodidae. Based on the comparison of extant and extinct species of this family, it is suggested that the non-cracking of the male tenth abdominal tergum may be a plesiomorphy. Moreover, an increasing number of Cretaceous webspinner species with ocelli are being described, providing material for understanding their evolution and adaptation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L., C.S. and Q.Y; validation, Z.P., C.S., D.R. and Q.Y.; resources, D.R. and Q.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, S.L., Z.P., C.S., D.R., and Q.Y.; visualization, S.L., Z.P., C.S. and Q.Y.; supervision, Q.Y. and C.S.; project administration, Q.Y., C.S. and D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and the APC were funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos: 32070425, 42072012, 32020103006).

Data Availability Statement

This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature). The LSID (Life Science Identifier) for this publication is urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:83E12FAF-1344-4E23-88C2-5C876F673E72.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ross, E.S. Lifelong Safari: The Story of a 93-Year-Old Peripatetic Insect Hunter. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009, 54, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ross, E.S. EMBIA: Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 1: Origin, relationships and integumental anatomy of the insect order Embiidina. Occas. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2000, 149, 1031. [Google Scholar]
  3. Büsse, S.; Büscher, T.H.; Kelly, E.T.; Heepe, L.; Edgerly, J.S.; Gorb, S.N. Pressure-induced silk spinning mechanism in webspinners (Insecta: Embioptera). Soft Matter 2019, 15, 9742–9750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ross, E.S. Chapter 86—Embiidina: (Embioptera, Webspinners). In Encyclopedia of Insects, 2nd ed.; Resh, V.H., Cardé, R.T., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 315–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aristov, D.S. New Insects (Insecta: Eoblattida, Embiida) from the Permian of Russia and the Triassic of Kyrgyzstan, with Observations on the Origin of Webspinners. Palaeoentomology 2017, 51, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gorochov, A.V. A new, enigmatic family for new genus and species of Polyneoptera from the Upper Permian of Russia. ZooKeys 2011, 130, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Aristov, D.S.; Storozhenko, S.Y. A new genus of the family Alexarasniidae (Insecta: Embiida) from the Triassic of Kyrgyzstan. Palaeoentomology 2021, 4, 433–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shcherbakov, D.E. Permian and Triassic ancestors of webspinners (Embiodea). Russ. Entomol. J. 2015, 24, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aristov, D.S.; Grauvogel-Stamm, L.; Marchal-Papier, F. New grylloblattid insects (Insecta: Grylloblattida) from the Grès à Voltzia of the Vosges (Middle Triassic of France). Paleontol. J. 2011, 45, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ross, E.S. EMBIA: Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 5. A review of the family Anisembiidae with descriptions of new taxa. Occas. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2003, 154, 1–123. [Google Scholar]
  11. Engel, M.S.; Huang, D.Y.; Breitkreuz, L.C.V.; Cai, C.; Alvarado, M. Two new species of mid-Cretaceous webspinners in amber from northern Myanmar (Embiodea: Clothodidae, Oligotomidae). Cretac. Res. 2016, 58, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cui, Y.Y.; Chen, Z.T.; Engel, M.S. New species of webspinners (Insecta: Embiodea) from mid-Cretaceous amber of northern Myanmar. Cretac. Res. 2020, 113, 104457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lai, Z.H.; Yang, Q.; Shi, C.F.; Zhang, W.W.; Ren, D. New webspinners (Insecta: Embioptera) from Upper Cretaceous amber of northern Myanmar. Cretac. Res. 2022, 130, 105040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anisyutkin, L.N.; Perkovsky, E.E. New data on embiids (Insecta: Embiodea) from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber, with description of new genus and two new species. Cretac. Res. 2022, 134, 105149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, X.Y.; Zhang, H.C. A new plesiomorphic species of webspinner (Embiodea, Clothodidae) from mid-Cretaceous Kachin amber of northern Myanmar. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2023, 26, 102060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pictet, F.J. Traité de paléontologie ou histoire naturelle des animaux fossiles considérés dans leurs rapports zoologiques et géologiques, 2nd ed.; Baillière, J.-B.: Paris, France, 1854. [Google Scholar]
  17. Falières, E.; Engel, M.S.; Nel, A. Earliest occurrence of Embiidae: A new genus from earliest Eocene Oise amber (Insecta: Embiodea). C. R. Palevol 2021, 20, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cockerell, T.D.A. Descriptions of tertiary insects II. Am. J. Sci. 1908, 25, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cockerell, T.D.A. Two interesting insects in Burmese amber. Entomologist 1919, 52, 193–195. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gorochov, A.V. New Family, Genus and Species of the Primitive Embioptera from the Triassic of Kyrgyzstan and Remarks on the Classifi cation of this Order. Entomol. Rev. 2021, 101, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Engel, M.S.; Grimaldi, D.A.; Singh, H.; Nascimbene, P.C. Webspinners in Early Eocene amber from western India (Insecta, Embiodea). ZooKeys 2011, 148, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Engel, M.S.; Grimaldi, D.A. The earliest webspinners (Insecta: Embiodea). Am. Mus. Novit. 2006, 3514, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Szumik, C.A. Oligembia vetusta, a new fossil teratembiid (Embioptera) from Dominican amber. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 1994, 102, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang, D.Y.; Nel, A. Oldest webspinners from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China (Insecta: Embiodea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 156, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Szumik, C.A. The higher classification of the order Embioptera: A cladistic analysis. Cladistics 1996, 12, 41–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Szumik, C.A. Phylogenetic systematics of Archembiidae (Embiidina, Insecta). Syst. Entomol. 2004, 29, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Szumik, C.A.; Edgerly, J.S.; Hayashi, C.Y. Phylogeny of embiopterans (Insecta). Cladistics 2008, 24, 993–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miller, K.B.; Hayashi, C.; Whiting, M.F.; Svenson, G.J.; Edgerly, J.S. The phylogeny and classification of Embioptera (Insecta). Syst. Entomol. 2012, 37, 550–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szumik, C.A.; Juárez, M.L.; Ramirez, M.J.; Goloboff, P.; Pereyra, V.V. Implications of the Tympanal Hearing Organ and Ultrastructure of Chaetotaxy for the Higher Classification of Embioptera. Am. Mus. Novit. 2019, 3933, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grimaldi, D.A.; Engel, M.S.; Nascimbene, P.C. Fossiliferous Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Burma): Its rediscovery, biotic diversity, and paleontological significance. Am. Mus. Novit. 2002, 3361, 1–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shi, G.H.; Grimaldi, D.A.; Harlow, G.E.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, M.C.; Lei, W.Y.; Li, Q.L.; Li, X.H. Age constraint on Burmese amber based on U-Pb dating of zircons. Cretac. Res. 2012, 37, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Poinar, G.O., Jr.; Buckley, R.; Brown, A.E. The secrets of Burmite amber. MAPS Dig. 2008, 20, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shi, C.F.; Yang, Q.; Winterton, S.L.; Pang, H.; Ren, D. Stem-group fossils of Symphrasinae shed light on early evolution of Mantispidae (Insecta, Neuroptera). Pap. Palaeontol. 2020, 6, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lai, D.H.; Chen, P.C.; Li, S.M.; Xiang, X.Z.; Ou, H.H.; Kang, N.Y.; Yang, J.T.; Pang, H.; Shih, C.K.; Labandeira, C.C.; et al. The associated evolution of raptorial foreleg and mantispid diversification during 200 million years. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2023, 10, nwad278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cui, Y.Y.; Bardin, J.; Wipfler, B.; Demers-Potvin, A.; Bai, M.; Tong, Y.J.; Chen, G.N.; Chen, H.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Ren, D.; et al. A winged relative of ice—crawlers in amber bridges the cryptic extant Xenonomia and a rich fossil record. Insect Sci. 2024, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.J.; Rasnitsyn, A.P.; Zhang, W.W.; Song, F.; Shih, C.; Ren, D.; Wang, Y.J.; Li, H.; Gao, T.P. Stem chewing lice on Cretaceous feathers preserved in amber. Curr. Biol. 2024, 34, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ross, E.S. Studies in the insect order Embiidina: A revision of the family Clothodidae. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1987, 45, 9–34. [Google Scholar]
Insects 15 00636 g004
Figure 4. (A) Gnethoda odontophora Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022, habitus, dorsal view; (B) head of Gnethoda odontophora Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022, showing the ocelli; (C) head of Gnethoda lata sp. nov., showing the ocelli; (D) head of Parasorellembia hamata sp. nov., showing the ocelli. Scale bars: (A) 1 mm, (B–D) 0.5 mm.
Figure 4. (A) Gnethoda odontophora Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022, habitus, dorsal view; (B) head of Gnethoda odontophora Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022, showing the ocelli; (C) head of Gnethoda lata sp. nov., showing the ocelli; (D) head of Parasorellembia hamata sp. nov., showing the ocelli. Scale bars: (A) 1 mm, (B–D) 0.5 mm.
Insects 15 00636 g004
Table 1. Described fossil webspinners (updated from Engel et al. [21]).
Table 1. Described fossil webspinners (updated from Engel et al. [21]).
Current NameGeological AgeDistributionReference
Alexarasniidae
Alexarasnia limbata Aristov, 2017Permian (Capitanian)Russia[5]
Alexarasnia rossica Gorochov, 2011Permian (Capitanian)Russia[6]
Madygembia rasnitsyni Aristov and Storozhenko, 2021Middle–Upper Triassic (Ladinian–Carnian)Kyrgyzstan[7]
Nestorembia novojilovi Shcherbakov, 2015Middle–Upper Triassic (Ladinian–Carnian)Kyrgyzstan[8]
Nestorembia shcherbakovi Aristov, 2017Middle–Upper Triassic (Ladinian–Carnian)Kyrgyzstan[5]
Nikloembia kusnezovi Shcherbakov, 2015Permian (Capitanian)Russia[8]
Palaeomesorthopteron pullum Aristov, Grauvogel-Stamm and Marchal-Papier, 2011Triassic (Anisian)France[7,9]
Anisembiidae
Glyphembia amberica Ross, 2003Miocene (Burdigalian)Dominican Republic[10]
Glyphembia vetehae (Szumik, 1998)Miocene (Burdigalian)Dominican Republic[10]
Poinarembia rota Ross, 2003Miocene (Burdigalian)Dominican Republic[10]
Clothodidae
Atmetoclothoda orthotenes Engel and Huang, 2016Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[11]
Gnethoda ancyla Cui and Engel, 2020Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[12]
Gnethoda lata Liu, Shi, Ren and Yang sp. nov.Cretaceous (Cenomanian)MyanmarThis study
Gnethoda odontophora Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[13]
Gnethoda putshkovi Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022 Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[14]
Gnethoda symmetrica Cui and Engel, 2020Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[12]
Henoclothoda simplex Cui and Engel, 2020Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[12]
Ocrognethoda olivea Liu, Shi, Ren and Yang gen. et sp. nov.Cretaceous (Cenomanian)MyanmarThis study
Perissoclothoda myrrhokaris Chen and Zhang, 2023Cretaceous (Cenomanian) Myanmar[15]
Embiidae
Electroembia antiqua (Pictet, 1854)Eocene (Lutetian)Baltic[16]
Galloembia raholai Falières, Engel and Nel 2021Eocene (Ypresian)France[17]
Lithembia florissantensis (Cockerell, 1908)Eocene–OligoceneColorado[18]
Notoligotomidae
Burmitembia venosa Cockerell, 1919Cretaceous (Albian)Myanmar[19]
Oligotomidae
Litoclostes delicatus Engel and Huang, 2016Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[8]
Rasnalexiidae
Rasnalexia rasnitsyni Gorochov, 2021Middle–Upper Triassic (Ladinian–Carnian)Kyrgyzstan[20]
Scelembiidae
Kumarembia hurleyi Engel and Grimaldi, 2011Eocene (Ypresian)India[21]
Multivena curvivena Lai, Yang and Zhang, 2022Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[13]
Parasorellembia groehni Anisyutkin and Perkovsky, 2022Cretaceous (Cenomanian)Myanmar[14]
Parasorellembia hamata Liu, Shi, Ren and Yang sp. nov.Cretaceous (Cenomanian)MyanmarThis study
Sorellembia estherae Engel and Grimaldi, 2006Cretaceous (Albian)Myanmar[22]
Teratembiidae
Oligembia vetusta Szumik, 1994Miocene (Burdigalian)Dominican Republic[23]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Peng, Z.; Shi, C.; Ren, D.; Yang, Q. New Genus and Species of Webspinners (Insecta: Embioptera) from the Mid-Cretaceous of Myanmar with a Catalog of Fossil Members. Insects 2024, 15, 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090636

AMA Style

Liu S, Peng Z, Shi C, Ren D, Yang Q. New Genus and Species of Webspinners (Insecta: Embioptera) from the Mid-Cretaceous of Myanmar with a Catalog of Fossil Members. Insects. 2024; 15(9):636. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090636

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Siting, Zihao Peng, Chaofan Shi, Dong Ren, and Qiang Yang. 2024. "New Genus and Species of Webspinners (Insecta: Embioptera) from the Mid-Cretaceous of Myanmar with a Catalog of Fossil Members" Insects 15, no. 9: 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090636

APA Style

Liu, S., Peng, Z., Shi, C., Ren, D., & Yang, Q. (2024). New Genus and Species of Webspinners (Insecta: Embioptera) from the Mid-Cretaceous of Myanmar with a Catalog of Fossil Members. Insects, 15(9), 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090636

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop