Next Article in Journal
Exploring Cold Hardiness within a Butterfly Clade: Supercooling Ability and Polyol Profiles in European Satyrinae
Next Article in Special Issue
An Odorant Receptor from the Proboscis of the Cotton Bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Narrowly Tuned to Indole
Previous Article in Journal
What Drives Caterpillar Guilds on a Tree: Enemy Pressure, Leaf or Tree Growth, Genetic Traits, or Phylogenetic Neighbourhood?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Time-Dependent Odorant Sensitivity Modulation in Insects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Enantiomeric Discrimination in Insects: The Role of OBPs and ORs

1
Biointeractions and Crop Protection Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK
2
School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(4), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040368
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 25 March 2022 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published: 8 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Physiology of Insect Olfaction)

Simple Summary

Insects use olfaction, i.e., their sense of smell, to detect odors that elicit behavioral responses, with structurally similar compounds eliciting different responses. The roles of specific recognition proteins, i.e., odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and odorant receptors (ORs), located in insect antennae, in discriminating between structurally similar compounds are not fully understood. Here, we explore current research in understanding the role of OBPs and ORs in discriminating between enantiomers—mirror image structures—in insect chemical ecology and chemoperception.

Abstract

Olfaction is a complex recognition process that is critical for chemical communication in insects. Though some insect species are capable of discrimination between compounds that are structurally similar, little is understood about how this high level of discrimination arises. Some insects rely on discriminating between enantiomers of a compound, demonstrating an ability for highly selective recognition. The role of two major peripheral olfactory proteins in insect olfaction, i.e., odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and odorant receptors (ORs) has been extensively studied. OBPs and ORs have variable discrimination capabilities, with some found to display highly specialized binding capability, whilst others exhibit promiscuous binding activity. A deeper understanding of how odorant-protein interactions induce a response in an insect relies on further analysis such as structural studies. In this review, we explore the potential role of OBPs and ORs in highly specific recognition, specifically enantiomeric discrimination. We summarize the state of research into OBP and OR function and focus on reported examples in the literature of clear enantiomeric discrimination by these proteins.
Keywords: insect; olfaction; chemosensory; odorant receptors; odorant-binding proteins; chiral; enantiomeric discrimination; chemical ecology insect; olfaction; chemosensory; odorant receptors; odorant-binding proteins; chiral; enantiomeric discrimination; chemical ecology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sims, C.; Birkett, M.A.; Withall, D.M. Enantiomeric Discrimination in Insects: The Role of OBPs and ORs. Insects 2022, 13, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040368

AMA Style

Sims C, Birkett MA, Withall DM. Enantiomeric Discrimination in Insects: The Role of OBPs and ORs. Insects. 2022; 13(4):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sims, Cassie, Michael A. Birkett, and David M. Withall. 2022. "Enantiomeric Discrimination in Insects: The Role of OBPs and ORs" Insects 13, no. 4: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040368

APA Style

Sims, C., Birkett, M. A., & Withall, D. M. (2022). Enantiomeric Discrimination in Insects: The Role of OBPs and ORs. Insects, 13(4), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13040368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop