Next Article in Journal
Exposure to Insecticides Reduces Populations of Rhynchophorus palmarum in Oil Palm Plantations with Bud Rot Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Hymenoptera Complex Associated with Myzus persicae and Hyalopterus spp. in Peach Orchards in Northeastern Spain and Prospects for Biological Control of Aphids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/insects10040110
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Endophytic Effects of Beauveria bassiana on Corn (Zea mays) and Its Herbivore, Rachiplusia nu (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

by
María Leticia Russo
1,
Ana Clara Scorsetti
1,
María Florencia Vianna
1,*,
Marta Cabello
1,2,
Natalia Ferreri
1 and
Sebastian Pelizza
1
1
Instituto de Botánica Carlos Spegazzini, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata- CICPBA Calle 53 # 477, La Plata 1900, Argentina
2
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CICPBA), Calle 526 entre 10 y 11, La Plata 1900, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2019, 10(4), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10040110
Submission received: 31 January 2019 / Revised: 29 March 2019 / Accepted: 10 April 2019 / Published: 18 April 2019
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Entomopathogenic fungi are widely recognized as agents of biological control worldwide. Their use in agriculture for the regulation of pest populations is a promising alternative to conventional insecticides. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that entomopathogenic fungi fulfill an additional role in plants as growth promoters. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the growth and yield of corn plants colonized with Beauveria bassiana and its effect on the lepidopteran pest Rachiplusia nu. Effects of the fungus on plant growth, crop yield, and vertical transmission were evaluated in the field. Feeding preferences of R. nu larvae were assessed in the laboratory using a “choice test”. Corn plants inoculated with B. bassiana showed an increase in height, number of leaves, grain weight, yield, and percentage of seed germination compared to control plants. Consumption of B. bassiana-colonized corn plants by R. nu larvae was reduced compared to feeding levels observed on non-inoculated plants. This study showed that endophytic B. bassiana can provide multiple benefits to Zea mays and can play an important role in future integrated pest management programs.

1. Introduction

Corn (Zea mays L.) is a member of the Poaceae family and it is originally from the Americas, particularly from Mexico, Central America, and South America. In this continent, it is the coarse grain with the largest area planted and the largest volume of production in annual tons. The primary economy of Argentina is mainly based on the cultivation of corn and Argentina is one of the five largest producers of corn worldwide [1,2]. Chemical fertilizers represent 30% of the crop production costs, and each year the amount of fertilizers and pesticides used increases in order to promote productivity, and as the land area in production grows. Arthropod pests restrict the production and quality of the grains of this crop, generating a gap between the annual average yields and the crop potential. Among the main corn pests are the lepidopteran defoliators. Rachiplusia nu (Guennée) is widely distributed in South America and is one of the primary lepidopteran pests of corn in this region [3]. Although chemical insecticides are effective against most pests, their indiscriminate use has generated a series of ecological problems, such as the development of resistance, environmental contamination, and negative impacts on human health [4,5]. The use of entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes is an alternative to chemical insecticides but may also be used to supplement or reduce the use of fertilizers. The fungi can act as plant growth-promoting agents, exhibiting important changes in the growth and yield of several crops [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
The entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals. -Criv.) Vuill. has been endophytically introduced with success in different plant species and has shown activity against different pests [17]. In corn, its insecticidal capacity was demonstrated against the lepidopterans Sesamia calamistis Hampson [18], Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner 1796) [19], and Spodoptera frugiperda Smith. [20]. Based on the previously mentioned background information and considering the potential benefits of entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes in plants, the purpose of this investigation was to assess the growth and yield of maize plants endophytically colonized by B. bassiana and its effect on the lepidopteran pest R. nu.

2. Materials and Methods

Two experiments were performed to evaluate the potential of endophytic B. bassiana introduced into corn plants by the leaf spraying technique [21]. In each experiment, we compared two treatments, plants inoculated with B. bassiana vs. non-inoculated plants. The first experiment was conducted during the years 2013–2014 (November–March) and 2014–2015 (November–March) in agreement with the crop cycle. The aim of this experiment was to analyze the effect of the entomopathogenic fungi on different growth parameters and the performance of these plants under field conditions. In a second experiment, performed in the laboratory, the food preference of R. nu was evaluated.
Corn plants were grown from seeds of the hybrid DK 699 MG (DEKALB-Monsanto, St. Louis, MO, USA). The seeds’ surfaces were sterilized by successive immersion in 2% sodium hypochlorite for two minutes, then 70% alcohol for three minutes, and finally three washes in sterile distilled water were made. The water from the last rinse was inoculated onto Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA, Britania® S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina) to evaluate if the sterilization method was effective. The seeds were dried on filter paper and left at 4 °C overnight to synchronize the growth [22] and thereafter were sown into 500 cm3 pots with sterile soil, perlite, and vermiculite (1:1:1). The pots were maintained under controlled conditions (25 °C and 12/12 h L:D) and water was provided as needed.
B. bassiana LPSc 1098 (GenBank KT163259) was acquired from the mycological collection of “Instituto de Botánica Spegazzini” (Buenos Aires, Argentina). The strain was selected due to its high sporulation capacity [23] and high rate of plant colonization as well as its proven efficacy against insect pests, causing the larval mortality of Helicoverpa gelotopoeon (Dyar), and S. frugiperda in laboratory bioassays [24]. To obtain the conidial suspension, the strain LPSc 1098 B. bassiana was cultivated onto PDA and incubated at 25 °C in darkness. After 15 days, conidia were harvested by scrapping them off the Petri dishes and were transferred to 10 mL of 0.01% (v/v) Tween 80 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate) (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA). The suspension was filtered and homogenized by shaking for 10 min. Conidial concentration was determined by using a Neubauer chamber and adjusted to 1 × 108 conidia/mL [21]. Conidial viability was assessed prior to inoculation of plants by plating 50 µL of 1 × 108 conidia/mL solution on PDA and incubating at 25° C for 18 h. Three random groups of 100 conidia were examined using a microscope to estimate percent germination. A conidium was considered to have germinated when a visible germ tube longer than half the diameter of the conidium was observed. Conidial germination was 95% and was considered acceptable for use in the experiments [25].
Plants were inoculated by the leaf spraying technique, using a glass hand sprayer (30 mL capacity) to spray each seedling with 3 mL of conidial suspension.
The insects were acquired from AgIdea (www.agidea.com.ar, Buenos Aires, Argentina), and bred for two generations in a bioterium under controlled conditions for temperature, relative humidity, and photoperiod (25 ± 2 °C, 70–75% RH, and 14:10 h L:D, respectively), according to Greene et al. [26]. Larvae were placed individually in Petri dishes with artificial diet as food source, which consisted of bean flour, beer yeast, methylparaben, ascorbic and sorbic acids, streptomycin, formaldehyde, vitamin complex, agar, and distilled water. Pupae were sexed and placed in couples in plastic containers (500 cm3). Adults were fed with a 10 % sugar solution until they laid eggs. These were reared until third instar larvae, which were then utilized in the bioassay.

2.1. Experiment I

The first experiment was carried out in the town of Alberti (35°01′00″ S–60°16′00″ W), Buenos Aires, Argentina, where corn is one of the main crops. In this region, the annual precipitation is 1050 mm and the temperature range over the crop cycle is 10–32 °C with an average of 20 °C [27].
The trial was performed with two treatments of 40 plants each and performed over two consecutive years, thus totaling 80 plants per treatment. Corn seedlings were first grown in a greenhouse at 25 °C and a 12:12 h L:D photoperiod for two weeks. To prevent deactivation of the conidia by exposure to UV rays, plants were inoculated inside the greenhouse using the leaf spraying method. Previous studies proved that leaf spraying is the most effective method for this B. bassiana strain to colonize corn plants [21]. Control plants were inoculated using the same methodology, but sprayed with a 0.01% solution of Tween 80 only. Two weeks after treatment, both the plants inoculated with the fungus and the control plants were transplanted to the field. Plants were distributed in a randomized way in rows (spacing between rows of 0.75 m) and in each row 10 plants were planted 0.50 m apart from each other.
Prior to transplanting the plants in the field, in order to asses endophytic colonization one leaf from each of the 40 plants was randomly selected for each treatment. These were washed twice in distilled water under laminar flow, then surface-sterilized by immersion for 1 min in 70% (v/v) ethanol, then 4 min in sodium hypochlorite (3%, v/v available chlorine), and finally washed three times in sterilized distilled water. After surface sterilization, samples were cut into 1-cm2 pieces with a sterile scalpel and aseptically transferred to plates containing 20 mL of PDA medium with 2 mL of antibiotics (0.5 g streptomycin and 0.25 g chloramphenicol/200 mL). The presence of B. bassiana in inoculated plants and the absence in control plants was corroborated after incubating plates at 25 °C in darkness for 72 h. The water from the last rinse was plated onto PDA media and incubated for 10 days at 25 °C to determine whether the sterilization process was successful in eliminating epiphytic micro-organisms. If we observed fungal growth, we did not consider the corresponding samples for analyses [21].

2.1.1. Measurement of Growth Parameters and Crop Yield

The effects the B. Bassiana LPSc 1098 as an endophyte were assessed using methods described by Distéfano et al. [28] and Lauer [29] when corn plants finished their cycle (five months). Total height, number of leaves, height and node number where the first cob emerged, number of rows per cob and number of grains per row, weight of grains per plant, number of cobs per plant, and crop yield were evaluated.

2.1.2. Vertical Transmission

To evaluate the potential for vertical transmission (from plant to seeds), 10 seeds from each inoculated plant (n = 800) and 10 seeds of each control plant (n = 800) were surface-sterilized as was previously explained for the seeds utilized at the beginning of the experiment [30], cut and placed onto Petri dishes containing a selective medium for entomopathogenic fungi that consisted of oatmeal agar with 0.5 g/L chloramphenicol as basal medium amended with 0.6 g/L CTAB (cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, Britania®, Buenos Aires, Argentina) [31]. Dishes were incubated in a chamber at 24 °C in darkness for 10 days to corroborate the presence/absence of the endophyte emerging from the seeds.
In addition, another 10 seeds from each inoculated plant (n = 800) and 10 seeds from each control plant (n = 800) were sown into pots with sterile substrate of soil, perlite, and vermiculite (1:1:1). This substrate was sterilized in an autoclave for 45 min at 121 °C, which was performed three times with 24-h intervals between each process [32]. The pots were maintained in a greenhouse under controlled conditions for temperature, humidity, and photoperiod (24 °C, 75% RH, 14:10 h L:D, respectively). To confirm the presence of the fungus as an endophyte, one leaf was removed from plants grown from seeds obtained from inoculated plants and from plants grown from seeds of control plants. Leaves surfaces were sterilized under the same conditions that were mentioned at the beginning of Experiment I. Four leaf fragments (10 × 10 mm) were placed onto sterile filter paper and allowed to dry under sterile conditions in a laminar flow cabinet. After drying, the fragments were placed onto Petri dishes containing PDA culture medium plus antibiotics (0.5 g streptomycin and 0.25 g chloramphenicol) and were held at 25 °C in the dark for 10 days in order to corroborate the presence/absence of the endophyte emerging from the leaves.

2.1.3. Percentage of Seed Germination

The percentage of seed germination from both inoculated and control plants was determined using two samples of 100 seeds each per treatment, and germination was assessed using methods modified from those described by Luna and Iannone [33], where the sample size was different and adhering to the standards of the “International Association of Seed Analysis” [34]. Sterilized and moistened sand was used as germination substrate. Seed germination was assessed in a chamber at 25 °C and a 12:12 h L:D photoperiod. The number of non-germinated and normal and abnormal seedlings was recorded 8 days after sowing. The percentage of seed germination was calculated as the percentage (%) of seeds that germinated and produced normal seedlings at the end of the test period.

2.2. Experiment II

Feeding Preference

To study the feeding preference of R. nu larvae for B. bassiana colonized vs. control (non-colonized) corn leaves, a “choice test” [35] was carried out. Inoculated and not-inoculated (control) leaves were simultaneously provided to the insects. The endophytic colonization by the entomopathogen was confirmed as in Experiment I. Fragments of 4 × 2 cm from 21-day-old leaves from inoculated and control plants were scanned to determine their initial surface area. Two leaf fragments, one from plants colonized with B. bassiana and the other from non-colonized plants that were used as controls, were placed into Petri dishes (90 mm diam.) over moistened filter paper. One L2 larva was placed inside each Petri dish and left for 24 h. Three independent replicates of 30 individuals each were set up. At the end of the experiment, the leaf fragments were scanned again utilizing ImageJ software [36] to determine the final area eaten (initial area—area after consumption) by the larvae, according to the methods of Crawford et al. [35].

2.3. Data Analysis

Dietary preference, percentage of seed germination, crop yield, and each of the growth parameters were compared between plants inoculated with B. bassiana and controls using Student’s t-test utilizing InfoStat software [37].

3. Results

3.1. Experiment I—Growth and Crop Yield in Plants Inoculated with B. bassiana

The endophytic association of the entomopathogenic fungus B. bassiana with corn plants promoted yield and plant growth. As shown in Table 1, the following morphological and reproductive parameters increased significantly in inoculated plants: plant height (t = 8.63, df = 158, p < 0.0001), number of leaves (t = 12.05, df = 158, p < 0.0001), height where the first cob emerged (t = 5.99, df = 158, p <0.0001), node number where the first cob emerged (t = 7.02, df = 158, p < 0.0001), number of rows per cob (t = 10.39, df = 158, p < 0.0001), number of grains per row (t = 8.35, df = 158, p < 0.0001), number of cobs per plant (t= 9.63.; df = 158, p < 0.0001), seed weight per plant (t = 9.64, df = 158, p < 0.0001), and crop yield (t = 8.39, df = 10, p < 0.0001).

Vertical Transmission of B. bassiana and Percentage of Seed Germination

Our results showed that B. bassiana LPSc 1098 was not transmitted vertically from the parental generation to the seeds. The entomopathogenic fungus was neither isolated from the seeds obtained from the plants grown in the field nor from the seedlings from those seeds.
However, the percentage of seed germination was significantly different between treatments (t = 5.85, df = 6, p < 0.0011) (Table 1).

3.2. Experiment II

Feeding Preference

Endophytic colonization of corn leaves by B. bassiana affected the leaf area consumed by R. nu larvae. As shown in Figure 1, significant differences in leaf area consumed (t = 5.23, df = 88, p < 0.0001) were found between inoculated and non-inoculated (control) plants.

4. Discussion

Our study demonstrated the positive effects of endophytic B. bassiana LPSc 1098 on the growth and yield of corn plants grown under field conditions. Similar effects with the same endophytic strain have also been reported on the growth parameters of different plant species [16]. Castillo López and Sword [10] demonstrated an increase in the height of Gossypium hirsutum plants and in the size of their fruits as a result of endophytic colonization by B. bassiana. Similarly, Sanchez Rodriguez et al. [12], using the seed immersion and soil inoculation techniques, showed that B. bassiana increased the growth and development of wheat plants, as well as the weight of the ears and the length of the roots. In contrast to our results, these authors found that B. bassiana caused a decrease in the weight of grains/plant compared to control plants. Our findings concur with those of Jaber and Enkerli [13] and Dash et al. [15], who found that the endophytic B. bassiana stimulated plant growth and led to an increase in the number of leaves produced by Vicia faba and Phaseolus vulgaris, respectively. Conversely, Akello et al. [38] showed that the presence of the fungus did not affect the growth of banana, and Qayyum et al. [39] observed a decrease in the size of tomato fruits harvested from plants colonized by the fungus. Our results concur with those of Kabaluk and Ericsson [6] and Sanchez Rodriguez et al. [12], who observed a significant increase in crop yield of corn and wheat, respectively, from plants colonized by entomopathogenic fungi. These divergent results might be due to the strong endophytic association of specific fungal endophytes strains with host plant species and even plant species varieties [13,40].
Regarding the mechanisms related to plant growth promotion, previous studies suggested that B. bassiana could reduce the damage caused by insect pests and/or act as an antagonist against certain pathogens [7,41]. The production of plant growth regulators by endophytic fungi is believed to promote plants growth and yield. There are several studies regarding auxins and cytokinins, two main hormones present in plants, that have been proven to be synthesized by entomopathogenic fungi endophytes [42]. In this sense, Liao et al. [42] showed that Metarhizium robertsii colonizing Arabidopsis sp. plants produces indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), which stimulates cellular division. Furthermore, previous studies by Joseph et al. [43] and Jirakkakul et al. [44] evidenced the production of structures called siderophores, which can modify the bioavailability of nutrients in the plant and thereby stimulate growth.
Related with percentage of seed germination obtained from inoculated plants, we observed an increase in this parameter in the plants that were inoculated with B. bassiana LPSc (1098) strain as endophyte. Although the vertical transmission of endophytic fungal entomopathogens has been demonstrated by only a few studies [45], we could not observe the vertical transmission of B. bassiana LPSc (1098) strain. These results may seem contradictory, but it can be hypothesized that the percentage of seed germination could not be influenced directly by B. bassiana, and may instead be an indirect effect of the presence of the fungus in the parent plant. Mechanisms underlying these observations need to be further investigated. Our results showed that R. nu larvae consumed less of corn leaves endophytically-colonized by B. bassiana. Martinuz et al. [45], using a choice test, also demonstrated that aphids preferred to feed on plants not colonized with the entomopathogenic fungi Fusarium oxysporum. Similar results were obtained for H. zea, H. gelotopoeon, and S. calamistis [10,24,46]. In contrast, Vianna et al. [47] concluded that H. gelotopoeon larvae preferentially fed on inoculated rather than non-inoculated tobacco leaves. There have been several attempts to explain the reduction in the consumption by insects when feeding on inoculated plants. It has been proposed that the production of secondary metabolites, the production of superoxides, changes in the phytosterol profile of plants, or the induction of an indirect systemic response could be responsible for this change of behavior in insects [10]. In this sense, the investigation performed by Shrivastava et al. [48] demonstrated that plants inoculated with B. bassiana showed higher levels of terpenoids, which are considered secondary metabolites with antiherbivore properties. These studies highlight the importance of incorporating the use of entomopathogenic fungi endophytes into strategies for protecting plants from pests and enhancing plant growth.

5. Conclusions

This study broadens our knowledge on the potential of entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes in corn plants. The presence of B. bassiana LPSc 1098 as an endophyte in maize plants negatively affected the feeding preference of inoculated leaves by R. nu and resulted in an increase in plant growth and yield. In this context, these microorganisms could be used in integrated pest management programs, which in turn could lead to reductions in the use of agrochemicals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.L.R. and S.P.; Formal analysis: M.L.R., M.F.V., and S.P.; Funding acquisition: A.C.S., M.C., and S.P.; Methodology: M.L.R., M.F.V., and N.F.; Supervision: A.C.S.; Writing—review and editing: M.L.R.

Funding

“Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas” (PIP 0018), “Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica” (PICT 2015 1146), “Proyecto de Investigación orientado” (PIO)(CONICET-UNLP) 2017-2018, “Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires”, and “Universidad Nacional de La Plata” (11/N 773) partially supported this investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. SAGPyA. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentos, Agricultura, Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca de Argentina. Estimaciones Agrícolas, Informes por Cultivo; 2017. Available online: https://www.sagpya.mecon.gov.ar/ (accessed on 9 September 2017).
  2. Tamagno, S.; Greco, I.; Almeida, H.; Borras, L. Physiological differences in yield related traits between flint and dent Argentinean commercial maize genotypes. Eur. J. Agron. 2015, 68, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rimoldi, F.; Fogel, M.N.; Schneider, M.I.; Ronco, A.E. Lethal and sublethal effects of cypermethrin and methoxyfenozide on the larvae of Rachiplusia nu (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 2012, 56, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sarandón, S.J. Incorporando la Agroecología en las Instituciones de Educación Agrícola: Una necesidad para la Sustentabilidad Rural. In La Agroecología en la Construcción de Alternativas Hacia la Sustentabilidad Rural; Hernández, J.M., Ed.; Ediciones Siglo, InstitutoTecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Occidente: Guadalajara, México, 2011; pp. 168–189. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ambethgar, V. Potential of entomopathogenic fungi in insecticide resistance management (IRM): A review. J. Biopestic. 2009, 2, 177–193. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kabaluk, J.T.; Ericsson, J.D. Seed treatment increases yield of field corn when applied for wireworm control. Agron. J. 2007, 99, 1377–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ownley, B.H.; Griffin, M.R.; Klingeman, W.E.; Gwinn, K.D.; Moulton, J.K.; Pereira, R.M. Beauveria bassiana: Endophytic colonization and plant disease control. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2008, 98, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vega, F.E. Insect pathology and fungal endophytes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2008, 98, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vega, F.E.; Goettel, M.S.; Blackwell, M.; Chandler, D.; Jackson, M.A.; Keller, S.; Koike, M.; Maniania, N.K.; Monzón, A.; Ownley, B.H.; et al. Fungal entomopathogens: New insights on their ecology. Fungal Ecol. 2009, 2, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castillo Lopez, D.; Sword, G.A. The endophytic fungal entomopathogens Beauveria bassiana and Purpureocillium lilacinum enhance the growth of cultivated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and negatively affect survival of the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa zea). Biol. Control 2015, 89, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sánchez Rodríguez, A.R.; Campillo, M.C.; Quesada-Moraga, E. Beauveria bassiana: An entomopathogenic fungus alleviates Fe chlorosis symptoms in plants grown on calcareous substrates. SciHort 2015, 197, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sánchez-Rodríguez, A.R.; Raya-Díaz, S.; Zamarreño, Á.M.; García-Mina, J.M.; del Campillo, M.C.; Quesada-Moraga, E. An endophytic Beauveria bassiana strain increases spike production in bread and durum wheat plants and effectively controls cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) larvae. Biol. Control 2018, 116, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jaber, L.R.; Enkerli, J. Effect of seed treatment duration on growth and colonization of Vicia faba by endophytic Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium brunneum. Biol. Control 2016, 103, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jaber, L.R.; Enkerli, J. Fungal entomopathogens as endophytes: Can they promote plant growth? Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dash, C.K.; Bamisile, B.S.; Keppanan, R.; Qasim, M.; Lin, Y.; Islam, S.U.; Wang, L. Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi enhance the growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabaceae) and negatively affect the development and reproduction of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Russo, M.L.; Pelizza, S.A.; Vianna, M.F.; Allegrucci, N.; Cabello, M.N.; Toledo, A.V.; Mourelos, C.; Scorsetti, A.C. Effect of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi on soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr. growth and yield. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vega, F.E. The use of fungal entomopathogens as endophytes in biological control: A review. Mycologia 2018, 110, 4–30. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cherry, A.J.; Banito, A.; Djegui, D.; Lomer, C. Suppression of the stem-borer Sesamia calamistis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize following seed dressing, topical application and stem injection with African isolates of Beauveria bassiana. Int. J. Pest. Manag. 2004, 50, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bing, L.; Lewis, L.C. Suppression of Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) by endophytic Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin. Environ. Entomol. 1991, 20, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramírez-Rodríguez, D.; Sanchez-Peña, S.R. Recovery of endophytic Beauveria bassiana on a culture medium based on cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2016, 26, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Russo, M.L.; Pelizza, S.A.; Cabello, M.N.; Stenglein, S.A.; Scorsetti, A.C. Endophytic colonisation of tobacco, corn, wheat and soybeans by the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota, Hypocreales). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Renuka, S.; Ramanujam, B.; Poornesha, B. Endophytic ability of different isolates of entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin in stem and leaf tissues of maize (Zea mays L.). Indian J. Microbiol. 2016, 56, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pelizza, S.A.; Eliades, L.A.; Scorsetti, A.C.; Cabello, M.N.; Lange, C.E. Entomopathogenic fungi from Argentina for the control of Schistocerca cancellata (Orthoptera: Acrididae) nymphs: Fungal pathogenicity and enzyme activity. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2012, 22, 1119–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Russo, M.L.; Scorsetti, A.C.; Vianna, M.F.; Allegrucci, N.; Ferreri, N.A.; Cabello, M.N.; Pelizza, S.A. Effects of endophytic Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) on biological, reproductive parameters and food preference of the soybean pest Helicoverpa gelotopoeon. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ayala-Zermeño, M.A.; Gallou, A.; Berlanga-Padilla, A.M.; Serna-Domínguez, M.G.; Arredondo-Bernal, H.C.; Montesinos-Matías, R. Characterisation of entomopathogenic fungi used in the biological control programme of Diaphorinacitri in Mexico. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 1192–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Greene, G.L.; Leppla, N.C.; Dickerson, W.A. Velvetbean caterpillar: A rearing procedure and artificial medium. J. Econ. Entomol. 1976, 69, 487–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Klein. Available online: http://trigoklein.com.ar/estacion-meteorologica/ (accessed on 10 July 2017).
  28. Distéfano, S.G.; Lenzi, L.; Gadbán, L.C.; Fuentes, F. Intensidad y pérdida de rendimiento en cultivares de soja por “mancha ojo de rana”. INTA Informe de ActualizaciónTécnica 2010, 17, 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lauer, J. Methods for Calculating Corn Yield. 2002. 33. Available online: http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/AA/pdf (accessed on 20 February 2019).
  30. Akello, J.; Sikora, R. Systemic acropedal influence of endophyte seed treatment on Acyrthosiphon pisum and Aphis fabae offspring development and reproductive fitness. Biol. Control 2012, 61, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Posadas, J.B.; Comerio, R.M.; Mini, J.; Nussenbaum, A.L.; Lecuona, R.E. A novel dodine-free selective medium based on the use of cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) to isolate Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae sensulato and Paecilomyces lilacinus from soil. Mycologia 2012, 104, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Allegrucci, N.; Velazquez, M.S.; Russo, M.L.; Pérez, M.E.; Scorsetti, A.C. Endophytic colonisation of tomato by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana: The use of different inoculation techniques and their effects on the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Plant Prot. Res. 2017, 54, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Luna, M.J.; Iannone, N. Efecto de la chinche de los cuernos “Dichelops furcatus” (F.) sobre la calidad de la semilla de soja. Rev. Facul. Agron. La Plata 2013, 112, 141–145. [Google Scholar]
  34. ISTA International Seed Testing Association. Rules for Seed Testing, Zürich. 2007. Available online: https://www.seedtest.org/upload/cms/user/ISTAMethodValidationforSeedTestinV1.01.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2017).
  35. Crawford, K.M.; Land, J.M.; Rudgers, J.A. Fungal endophytes of native grasses decrease insect herbivore preference and performance. Oecologia 2010, 164, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bailer, W. Writing ImageJ Plugins. A Tutorial. Version 1.71. 2006. Available online: https://media.ijm.fr/fileadmin/www.ijm.fr/MEDIA/imagerie/fichiers/tut_pluginwb.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2017).
  37. InfoStat. InfoStat Versión 1.1; Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba: Córdoba, Argentina, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  38. Akello, J.; Dubois, T.; Coyne, D.; Kyamanywa, S. The effects of Beauveria bassiana dose and exposure duration on colonization and growth of tissue cultured banana (Musa sp.) plants. Biol. Control 2009, 49, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qayyum, M.A.; Wakil, W.; Arif, M.J.; Sahi, S.T.; Dunlap, C.A. Infection of Helicoverpa armigera by endophytic Beauveria bassiana colonizing tomato plants. Biol. Control 2015, 90, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Akutse, K.S.; Maniania, N.K.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Van Den Berg, J.; Ekesi, S. Endophytic colonization of Vicia faba and Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) by fungal pathogens and their effects on the life-history parameters of Liriomyza huidobrensis(Diptera: Agromyzidae). Fungal. Ecol. 2013, 6, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gurulingappa, P.; Sword, G.A.; Murdoch, G.; McGee, P.A. Colonization of crop plants by fungal entomopathogens and their effects on two insect pests when in planta. Biol. Control 2010, 55, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liao, X.; Lovett, B.; Fang, W.; St Leger, R.J. Metarhizium robertsii produces indole-3-acetic acid, which promotes root growth in Arabidopsis and enhances virulence to insects. Microbiology 2017, 163, 980–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Joseph, E.; Cario, S.; Simon, A.; Worle, M.; Mazzeo, R.; Junier, P.; Job, D. Protection of metal artifacts with the formation of metal-oxalates complexes by Beauveria bassiana. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jirakkakul, J.; Cheevadhanarak, S.; Punya, J.; Chutrakul, C.; Senachak, J.; Buajarern, T.; Amnuaykanjanasin, A. Tenellin acts as an iron chelator to prevent iron-generated reactive oxygen species toxicity in the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015, 362, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Martinuz, A.; Schouten, A.; Menjivar, R.D.; Sikora, R.A. Effectiveness of systemic resistance toward Aphis gossypii (Hom., Aphididae) as induced by combined applications of the endophytes Fusarium oxysporum Fo162 and Rhizobium etli G12. Biol. Control 2012, 62, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Powell, W.A.; Klingeman, W.E.; Ownley, B.H.; Gwinn, K.D.; Dee, M.; Flanagan, P.C. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana in tomatoes yields mycosis in tomato fruitworm larvae. Hort Sci. 2007, 42, 933. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vianna, F.; Pelizza, S.; Russo, L.; Allegrucci, N.; Scorsetti, A. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) alters Helicoverpa gelotopoeon (D.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) life cycle and reproductive parameters. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2018, 58, 321–327. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shrivastava, G.; Ownley, B.H.; Augé, R.M.; Toler, H.; Dee, M.; Vu, A.; Chen, F. Colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi enhanced terpene production in tomato plants and their defense against a herbivorous insect. Symbiosis 2015, 65, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 10 00110 g001 550
Figure 1. Total area consumed (mm2) by Rachiplusia nu larvae fed with Beauveria bassiana-colonized corn plants (treated) and non-colonized corn plants (control).
Figure 1. Total area consumed (mm2) by Rachiplusia nu larvae fed with Beauveria bassiana-colonized corn plants (treated) and non-colonized corn plants (control).
Insects 10 00110 g001
Table
Table 1. Growth parameters, yield characteristics, and seed germination from corn plants colonized with Beauveria bassiana (LPSc 1098) (treated) and non-colonized corn plants (control). Mean values ± SEM presented. Within each parameter measured (row) numbers followed by different letters are significantly different (Student’s t-test).
Table 1. Growth parameters, yield characteristics, and seed germination from corn plants colonized with Beauveria bassiana (LPSc 1098) (treated) and non-colonized corn plants (control). Mean values ± SEM presented. Within each parameter measured (row) numbers followed by different letters are significantly different (Student’s t-test).
ParameterTreatedControl
Height (m)2.16 ± 0.17 a1.90 ± 0.18 b
Number of leaves22.13 ± 0.34 a19.06 ± 0.34 b
First cob appearance (cm)72.06 ± 1.01 a66.5 ± 1.66 b
Number of cobs/plant1.76 ± 0.11 a1.2 ± 0.40 b
Number of nodes where the first cob appears5.16 ± 0.13 a4.36 ± 0.15 b
Number of grain rows/cob14.3 ± 0.25 a11.8 ± 0.28 b
Number of grains/row34.5 ± 0.78 a26.1 ± 1.2 b
Seed weight/plant (gr)205.16 ± 3.2 a98.8 ± 3.8 b
Yield (Kg/ha)15,357.19 ± 35.8 a7222.08 ± 38.7 b
Seed germination (%)89 ± 2 a77 ± 5.5 b

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Russo, M.L.; Scorsetti, A.C.; Vianna, M.F.; Cabello, M.; Ferreri, N.; Pelizza, S. Endophytic Effects of Beauveria bassiana on Corn (Zea mays) and Its Herbivore, Rachiplusia nu (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects 2019, 10, 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10040110

AMA Style

Russo ML, Scorsetti AC, Vianna MF, Cabello M, Ferreri N, Pelizza S. Endophytic Effects of Beauveria bassiana on Corn (Zea mays) and Its Herbivore, Rachiplusia nu (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects. 2019; 10(4):110. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10040110

Chicago/Turabian Style

Russo, María Leticia, Ana Clara Scorsetti, María Florencia Vianna, Marta Cabello, Natalia Ferreri, and Sebastian Pelizza. 2019. "Endophytic Effects of Beauveria bassiana on Corn (Zea mays) and Its Herbivore, Rachiplusia nu (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)" Insects 10, no. 4: 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10040110

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop