1. Introduction
The dynamic characteristics of rotor-bearing systems are crucial for many applications in mechanical engineering, particularly in high-speed rotating machinery and complex operating conditions such as surface ships, aircraft, and centrifugal pumps. Recent research has highlighted the significant impact of base motion (e.g., ship pitching, rolling, and heaving) and external excitations (e.g., earthquakes, wind loads, and wave forces) on the dynamic behavior of rotor-bearing systems. Specifically, ships experience random heave and rocking motions due to wave impacts, which increase the capsizing moment and affect ship stability, potentially leading to capsizing [
1,
2]. Therefore, it is essential to consider the effects of base rocking on the vibration characteristics of journal bearing-rotor systems.
In the early stages, research primarily focused on the vibration characteristics of journal bearing-rotor systems under conditions where there was no base rocking. For instance, J.W. Lund [
3] and J. Glienicke [
4] proposed using the linear stiffness and damping coefficients of journal bearings to describe their dynamic characteristics. Based on these eight coefficients, they developed a linear theory to predict oil film instability in journal bearing-rotor systems. Lin [
5] developed a 4-degrees-of-freedom dynamic model using the assumed modes method for a dual-disc rotor-bearing system, considering the nonlinear vibration characteristics and stability under multifrequency excitation. The results indicate that variations in system parameters alter the relative positions of resonance peaks, thereby exerting more complex influences on the nonlinear response. Additionally, Xue [
6] investigated the dynamic characteristics of accelerated rotors on SHSB. The results demonstrated that, as the target rotational speed increased, the shaft center orbit during acceleration exhibited progressively intricate complexity, accompanied by a prolonged stabilization time required for the bearing system. Furthermore, elevated unbalanced levels induced significant increases in both vibration amplitude and frequency during acceleration, thereby diminishing the stability of the rotor system. Zhongliang Xie et al. [
7,
8,
9,
10] investigated the impact mechanisms of bearing misalignment, radial clearance, and thermal effects on the performance of water-lubricated bearings (WLBs), providing theoretical support for the design of rotor systems with water-lubricated bearings in marine environments. Jon S. Larsen [
11] utilized the finite element method to discretize the Reynolds equation and established a mathematical model that could accurately predict the nonlinear steady-state response of rigid rotors supported by gas film bearings. Jin [
12] proposed a novel dynamic model for a double-disc cracked rotor-bearing system with an inner race defect. A quantitative dual-impulse model was employed to investigate the effects of the dual-impulse phenomenon caused by the inner race defect on the system’s stability and transient response.
As research has progressed, scholars have increasingly focused on the effects of base motion on rotor-bearing systems. Rui Wang et al. [
13] developed a nonlinear rotor system model using the Lagrange method. Their study demonstrated that linearized models are inadequate for accurately representing the actual dynamic behavior of bearing-rotor systems, especially under complex operating conditions such as combined base motion and centrifugal forces. Zhanxing Liu [
14] established a novel oil film force model considering base motion by combining the Lagrange principle with the finite element method. The results showed that the harmonic motion of the base significantly amplifies the rotor trajectory, particularly under the influence of inertial forces, leading to a substantial increase in the vibration amplitude of the rotor. MajidiRad et al. [
15] developed a simple numerical model using the finite element method and compared the simulation results with experimental data to investigate the impact of base excitation on the deviation of the rotor from its normal operating state. Bo Zhang et al. [
16] used a multidimensional harmonic balance method combined with an alternating frequency-domain approach to calculate the steady-state response of the rotor system. Their findings indicated that the time-varying parameters of base motion have a significant effect on the amplitude–frequency response of the lateral displacement of the rotor system. Jarroux et al. [
17] studied the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of actively magnetically supported rotors under base motion using both experimental and numerical methods. Mzaki Dakel et al. [
18,
19] investigated the dynamic behavior of a rigid rotor subjected to base excitation and mass imbalance. Subsequently, they extended their study to examine the nonlinear dynamic behavior of a flexible rotor system under base motion. The results demonstrated that base rotation significantly alters the natural frequencies of the rotor. Additionally, at higher levels of sinusoidal base excitation, the system may enter an unstable state or exhibit complex nonlinear dynamic behavior.
Several scholars have conducted research on rotor-bearing systems under specific application scenarios, providing valuable insights into their dynamic behavior. Yongchao Han [
20] developed a mathematical model based on short bearing theory in a non-inertial reference frame, incorporating heave motion. Using numerical integration methods, Han analyzed the dynamic characteristics of the system. The results showed that heave motion has a significant impact on the dynamics of the rotor system. Wenzhuo Zhang [
21] considered the coupled pitch and heave motions of ships, as well as the nonlinear oil film moments caused by rotor tilt. His findings indicated that under high-speed conditions, the amplitude of the rotor system increases dramatically, potentially leading to contact between the rotor and the inner wall of the bearing.
Zhao et al. [
22] investigated the steady-state response of a coupled airbag–raft rotor-bearing system, analyzing the effects of system spectra, orbits, and parameters. Their results demonstrated that at low speeds, the system exhibits single-periodic motion; as speed increases, the motion gradually transitions to quasi-periodic and chaotic states. Zheming Tong et al. [
23] proposed a new method for modeling the dynamics of gear systems, considering the influence of ship heave motion. They analyzed the impact of key wave and navigation parameters on gear dynamics, providing a comprehensive understanding of the system’s behavior under marine conditions. Fusheng Lin [
24] established a mathematical model for an unbalanced rotor system in maneuvering flight, showing that the flight state of the aircraft significantly affects the unbalance response of the rotor. Gaganis et al. [
25] studied the nonlinear characteristics of rotor systems under different support conditions, considering seismic loads. Their research highlighted the complex interactions between seismic forces and rotor dynamics. Zhang Guanghui et al. [
26] developed a nonlinear model for rotor-bearing systems that incorporates coupled base motion and nonlinear oil film forces. Their study focused on the impact of unbalanced mass on the system’s nonlinear dynamics. The results indicated that the pitch and roll motions of ships introduce additional excitation vectors and stiffness matrices, altering the nonlinear oil film forces and, thus, affecting the system’s dynamic behavior.
In previous studies, researchers have primarily focused on theoretical analyses of bearing-rotor systems under base motion, such as establishing theoretical models to simulate roll motion, pitch motion, and coupled pitch–roll–heave motions through numerical simulations. However, the experimental validation and empirical exploration of rotor stability evolution remain significantly underdeveloped. To address this research gap, the present study designs and constructs a six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) coupled test rig for a journal bearing-rotor system, which inputs variable rocking periods and amplitudes to replicate typical maritime conditions encountered during ship navigation. This experimental framework not only fills the gap of experimental research to study the stability of the system under complex rocking loads but also reveals the influence laws of base pitch and roll motions on the critical speed, instability threshold and vibration response of the rotor system through the measured data. These findings provide an important engineering reference for the stability design of ship propulsion systems.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Vibration Characterization of the System Without Rocking Motion
Figure 6a presents a waterfall plot of the rotor system in the y-direction under conditions without base rocking motion. From the figure, it can be observed that as the rotor speed increases from 1500 r/min to 6060 r/min, the vibration amplitude of the rotor system significantly increases after exceeding 3000 r/min, reaching its maximum at 3583 r/min, followed by a rapid decrease. This phenomenon indicates that the first-order critical speed of the rotor system is 3583 r/min.
When the speed is further increased to 6060 r/min (as shown in
Figure 6b), the low-frequency vibration amplitude rapidly rises to 9 μm. Notably, in addition to the 0.4× fundamental frequency component, a 60 Hz low-frequency component also appears in the shaft system, which corresponds to the first-order critical speed of the rotor. Furthermore, the rotor’s orbit exhibits a divergent “petal-like” shape, indicating that oil whip has occurred, leading to the loss of system stability.
3.2. Influence of Pitch and Roll Motions on the Critical Speed of the System
In order to investigate the effect of the base rocking motion on the critical speed of the rotor system, the first-order critical speed of 3583 r/min without base rocking motion is taken as the baseline in this study. Under the condition of base rocking motion, the rotor speed is gradually increased from 3400 r/min to 4000 r/min, and the test data obtained under different rocking conditions are plotted as amplitude–frequency response curves.
Figure 7 illustrates the trend of rotor vibration amplitude with rotational speed under different roll periods. As shown in
Figure 7, when the roll amplitude increases from 4° to 20°, the critical rotational speeds under different roll test conditions are all between 3600 and 3700 r/min, and there is no obvious principle. The rotational speeds corresponding to the resonance peaks under the condition of a 3 s roll period are 3663 r/min, 3675 r/min, 3680 r/min, 3675 r/min, 3687 r/min, respectively; the rotational speeds corresponding to the resonance peaks under the condition of a 6 s roll period are 3627 r/min, 3660 r/min, 3675 r/min, 3680 r/min, 3655 r/min, respectively; the rotational speeds corresponding to the resonance peaks under the condition of a 9 s roll period are 3651 r/min, 3665 r/min, 3651 r/min, 3670 r/min, 3639 r/min; the rotational speeds corresponding to the resonance peaks under the condition of a 12 s rolling period were 3663 r/min, 3625 r/min, 3687 r/min, 3685 r/min, 3699 r/min, respectively.
Notably, after the primary resonance peak in the rotor system, a secondary peak with a significantly smaller amplitude is observed (see
Figure 7a). Due to the base roll motion, the rocking load excitation no longer limits the journal motion to a small perturbation near the original static equilibrium position, which results in changes in bearing stiffness and damping. The first-order critical speed of the rotor system remains essentially unchanged, whereas the amplitude of the resonance peak increases significantly compared to the case without rocking motion.
Figure 8 illustrates the trend of rotor vibration amplitude with rotational speed under different pitch periods. As shown in
Figure 8, when the pitch amplitude increases from 2° to 10°, the critical rotational speeds under different pitch test conditions are all between 3600 and 3700 r/min, and there is no obvious principle. The rotational speeds corresponding to the resonance peaks under the condition of a 3 s pitch period are 3687 r/min, 3630 r/min, 3627 r/min, 3699 r/min, 3651 r/min, respectively; the rotational speeds corresponding to the resonance peaks under the condition of a 6 s pitch period are 3687 r/min, 3699 r/min, 3627 r/min, 3639 r/min, 3680 r/min, respectively; the rotational speeds corresponding to the resonance peaks under the condition of an 8 s pitch period are 3660 r/min, 3660 r/min, 3625 r/min, 3650 r/min, 3700 r/min; the rotational speeds corresponding to the resonance peaks under the condition of a 10 s pitch period are 3675 r/min, 3685 r/min, 3670 r/min, 3687 r/min, 3660 r/min, respectively.
Notably, at a period of 3 s, the rotor experiences a secondary resonance peak after the first resonance peak (as shown in
Figure 8a), with a significantly increased amplitude. This suggests that as the rocking period shortens, the base rocking frequency interacts with the rotor rotation frequency to trigger the secondary resonance.
3.3. Influence of Pitch and Roll Motions on System Vibration Amplitude
Figure 9 illustrates the vibration response characteristics of the rotor system under a rotational speed of 3400 r/min, a roll period of 3 s, and a roll amplitude of 20°. From
Figure 9, time-domain fluctuations induced by roll excitation exhibit periodicity synchronized with the 3 s roll period (0.333 Hz). The frequency spectrum further reveals that, in addition to the fundamental vibration component (see
Figure 9b), there exists a distinct frequency component at 0.333 Hz corresponding to the roll motion characteristics.
To investigate the influence of rocking load excitation on the vibration characteristics of the rotor system, the rotor speed was set to 3400 r/min under conditions where the base under roll and pitch motions and the rotor speed approached the critical speed. The vibration data from five consecutive rocking periods were analyzed. Considering the potential non-stationary characteristics during the initial period, it was decided to exclude the data from the first cycle and extract and analyze only the fundamental frequency vibration data from the remaining four complete periods.
Figure 10 and
Figure 11, respectively, present the variation trends of the fundamental frequency vibration amplitude in the y-direction of the rotor over time under different roll periods (3 s, 6 s, 9 s, 12 s) and pitch periods (3 s, 6 s, 8 s, 10 s) of the base. It can be observed from the figures that under the excitation of both roll and pitch motions, the fundamental frequency vibration amplitude of the rotor exhibits periodic variations that are synchronized with the base motion. Specifically, when the base undergoes roll motion with a fixed rocking amplitude, the variation trends of the fundamental frequency vibration amplitude under different roll periods are similar. In contrast, when the base undergoes pitch motion, the variation trend of the fundamental frequency vibration amplitude becomes more pronounced as the pitch frequency increases.
The maximum vibration amplitudes corresponding to the fundamental frequency under various roll motion conditions were extracted and are plotted in
Figure 12. It can be observed that the fundamental frequency vibration amplitude of the rotor increases significantly with the increase in rocking amplitude. Under roll motion, when the roll amplitude increases from 4° to 20°, the corresponding fundamental frequency vibration amplitude rises sharply from 20 μm to 29 μm, representing an increase of 45%. In contrast, under pitch motion, when the pitch amplitude increases from 2° to 10°, the corresponding fundamental frequency vibration amplitude surges from 19 μm to 29 μm, reflecting a 52% increase. Notably, when the roll amplitude of the base remains constant, the fundamental frequency vibration amplitudes of the rotor under different rolling frequencies are nearly identical, with variations not exceeding 2 μm. However, under pitching motion, the variation trend of the fundamental frequency vibration amplitude of the rotor becomes more pronounced as the pitch frequency increases.
Figure 13 and
Figure 14, respectively, illustrate the time-varying trends of the rocking frequency amplitude in the y-direction of the rotor system under different roll periods (3 s, 6 s, 9 s, 12 s) and pitch periods (3 s, 6 s, 8 s, 10 s). The results demonstrate that the rocking frequency amplitude of the rotor system exhibits frequency-synchronized periodic modulation with the base motion under both roll and pitch excitations. Notably, during roll excitation with fixed angular amplitude, the amplitude variation trends of rotor rocking frequency remain highly consistent across different roll periods, mirroring the characteristics observed in base-frequency vibration amplitude evolution. Conversely, under pitch excitation, a pronounced enhancement in amplitude variation trends emerges with increasing pitch frequency, revealing marked dynamic sensitivity to pitch-induced parametric excitation. This phenomenon further highlights the enhanced sensitivity of the rotor system to period variation in base pitch motion.
The maximum vibration amplitudes corresponding to the rocking frequencies under various rocking conditions are plotted in
Figure 15. It is evident that the amplitude of the rotor system’s rocking frequency significantly increases with the increase in both rocking amplitude and frequency. Specifically, during base roll and pitch motions, as the rocking amplitudes increase from 4° to 20° and from 2° to 10°, respectively, the corresponding rocking frequency amplitudes escalate sharply from 3 μm to 15 μm, representing a 400% increase.
Notably, for roll periods ranging from 12 s to 6 s, the rocking frequency amplitudes remain relatively constant. However, when the roll period decreases to 3 s, there is a marked rise in these amplitudes. Similarly, as the pitch periods decrease from 10 s to 6 s, the rocking frequency amplitudes increase gradually; a further reduction in the pitch period to 3 s leads to a significant enhancement in these amplitudes. This indicates that the angular acceleration of the base motion decreases significantly when the base roll and pitch periods are relatively long, resulting in a decrease in the amplitude of the additional excitation due to inertial forces in the coupled motion. However, as the period shortens, the base angular acceleration increases substantially, resulting in pronounced changes in the nonlinear oil film force characteristics, which ultimately trigger a significant amplification of the rotor’s vibration amplitude.
3.4. Influence of Pitch and Roll Motions on the Instability Speed of the System
Figure 16 presents waterfall plots of the system’s vibration along the y-direction under operating conditions with a period of 3 s, a roll amplitude of 20°, and a pitch amplitude of 10°. It can be observed from the figures that during the speed ramp-up of the rotor, low-frequency vibrations associated with the rocking motion persistently occur. When the rotor speed increases to a range of 5280–5400 r/min, a component at 1/3 of the fundamental frequency, which varies with rotational speed, is detected in the vibration spectrum of the shafting. Compared to the sub-synchronous whirl (0.42–0.5X) typically observed in traditional journal bearings, this frequency component is notably lower. This phenomenon may be attributed to the rocking motion accelerating lubricant leakage at both ends of the bearing bush.
Further observations reveal that when the rotor speed reaches 5400 r/min, the amplitude of the low-frequency vibration sharply increases to 10 μm. In
Figure 16, in addition to the oil film whirl frequency and the rocking motion frequency, a low-frequency component corresponding to the critical speed also emerges. Current research defines the instability rotational speed of the shaft system of the base rocking motion as follows: the hull motion and the nonlinear bearing oil force produce low frequency at the same time, and the rotational speed at which the nonlinear bearing oil film force produces low frequency is the corresponding instability rotational speed [
26]. Refer to this determination theorem. When the speed further increases to 5600 r/min, this frequency component remains constant, indicating the occurrence of “frequency locking”. This phenomenon suggests that oil film whip occurs at a rotor speed of 5400 r/min, leading to the loss of system stability.
To more clearly elucidate the influence of pitch and roll motions on the instability threshold speed of the rotor, the spectral characteristics within a complete rocking period at the onset of instability were extracted and analyzed under different experimental conditions.
Figure 17 and
Figure 18, respectively, present the spectral characteristics of the system in the y-direction under base roll and pitch motion conditions. From the figures, it can be observed that when the system enters an unstable state, the amplitude of the low-frequency vibrations of the rotor significantly increases. The low-frequency components are mainly concentrated at 30 Hz, 60 Hz, and the rocking frequency. Specifically, 30 Hz corresponds to 0.333X; 60 Hz is associated with the system’s first-order critical speed; and the rocking frequency is excited by the base motion. Furthermore, as discussed in
Section 3.3, under constant rotational speed conditions, the vibration characteristics of the rotor within one complete rocking period vary periodically with the rocking amplitude. This indicates that during the instability process of the rotor, the low-frequency vibration components also ‘exhibit periodic behavior’.
Figure 19 illustrates the dynamic evolution of the shaft center trajectory at various time points across a complete roll period under base roll excitation with an amplitude of 20° and a period of 3 s, during system instability. From
Figure 19a, it can be observed that when the six-degrees-of-freedom platform is at its initial position (with a rocking amplitude of 0°), the rotor center trajectory exhibits an elliptical shape; as the platform undergoes roll motion, at 1/4 of the period, the rotor center trajectory evolves from an elliptical shape into a petal-like pattern; at 1/2 of the period, when the platform returns to its initial position, the rotor center trajectory reverts to an elliptical shape; at 3/4 of the period and at the end of the period, the rotor center trajectory remains elliptical.
Figure 19b presents the corresponding rotor frequency spectrum at the same time instants; at 1/4 of the period, the amplitude of low-frequency oscillations in the system increases significantly, leading to instability. The dynamic response characteristics of the rotor system under pitch motion excitation are very similar to those under roll motion, as shown in
Figure 20.
The above experimental results indicate that under time-varying rocking load excitation, when the rotational speed of the rotor approaches the instability threshold without base rocking (6060 r/min), the shaft center is subjected to alternating loads, causing it to deviate from its static equilibrium position and undergo large-scale displacement within the bearing clearance. At this point, the amplitude of the nonlinear oil film force increases sharply, accompanied by abrupt changes in direction, ultimately leading to “periodic intermittent instability” phenomena.
Figure 21 illustrates the trend of system instability speed as a function of rocking amplitude under different experimental conditions. The red reference line corresponds to the system’s instability speed (6060 r/min) without base rocking motion. Experimental data reveal that as the rocking amplitude and frequency increase, the stability of the rotor system deteriorates, and the instability threshold occurs earlier. Within the smaller range of rocking amplitudes (roll amplitudes from 4° to 12° and pitch amplitudes from 2° to 6°), the system’s instability speed decreases significantly. Under roll conditions, the instability speed of the shaft system drops from 5760 r/min to 5460 r/min, representing a reduction of 5.2%. Under pitch conditions, the instability speed decreases from 5820 r/min to 5400 r/min, with a reduction of 7.2%. As the rocking amplitude continues to increase, the declining trend of the instability speed gradually slows down and eventually stabilizes at 5400 r/min. Notably, when the rocking frequency increases, the base roll motion causes a gradual decline in the system’s instability speed, whereas the pitch motion exhibits a more pronounced reduction in instability speed.