Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Advances in Stellar and Galactic Evolution with the Population of Planetary Nebula Progenitors from the APOGEE DR17 Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Habitability and Stellar Habitable Zones from Observed Exoplanets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Insight on AGB Mass-Loss and Dust Production from PNe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stellar Evolution and Convection in 3D Hydrodynamic Simulations of a Complete Burning Phase

1
Astrophysics Group, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK
2
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Via Tiepolo 11, I-34143 Trieste, Italy
3
Kavli IPMU (WPI), University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8583, Japan
4
Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
5
Geneva Observatory, Geneva University, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
6
Pasadena Consulting Group, 1075 N Mar Vista Ave, Pasadena, CA 91104, USA
7
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK
8
Department of Physics, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
9
Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Galaxies 2024, 12(6), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060087
Submission received: 14 September 2024 / Revised: 21 November 2024 / Accepted: 4 December 2024 / Published: 9 December 2024

Abstract

:
Our understanding of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis is limited by the uncertainties coming from the complex multi-dimensional processes in stellar interiors, such as convection and nuclear burning. Three-dimensional stellar models can improve this knowledge by studying multi-D processes, but only for a short time range (minutes or hours). Recent advances in computing resources have enabled 3D stellar models to reproduce longer time scales and include nuclear reactions, making the simulations more accurate and allowing to study explicit nucleosynthesis. Here, we present results from 3D stellar simulations of a convective neon-burning shell from a 20 M star, run with an explicit nuclear network from its early development to complete fuel exhaustion. We show that convection halts when fuel is exhausted, stopping its further growth after the entrainment of fresh material. These results, which highlight the differences and similarities between 1D and multi-D stellar models, have important implications for the evolution of convective regions in stars and their nucleosynthesis.

1. Introduction

Today, the structure and evolution of a star are normally investigated through one-dimensional (1D) stellar models. Thanks to their simplified prescriptions for reproducing the stellar physical processes, 1D models are the most used tools for reproducing the life of a star, being able to effectively produce entire grids of stellar models, useful for different fields. However, the prescriptions adopted need to be carefully calibrated, either through observations or multi-D stellar modeling; however, a calibration performed with short-time-range simulations may not be correct. Classic examples of such prescriptions are the mixing length theory (MLT) [1] and convective boundary mixing (CBM, also known as ‘overshoot’) [2], employed to determine the extent of convective regions in stars; these two prescriptions can lead to degeneracy and sometimes yield significantly different results. Multi-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of specific portions of stars are able to couple the fluid motions with other physical processes such as nuclear burning, rotation, and magnetic fields. This approach is disfavored by the great computing resources required for these simulations. For these reasons, only small sections of a star can be modeled, and for a time scale compatible with hours of stellar evolution. Therefore, it is possible to improve our understanding of these processes only with a combined effort from both 1D and multi-D stellar simulations. Having a correct knowledge of convection and CBM is of great relevance for asymptotic-giant-branch (AGB) stars, for their impact on the formation of the 13C-pocket and its consequent nucleosynthesis. In fact, CBM under the convective envelope during the third dredge-up is responsible for the formation of the 13C-pocket; therefore, its specific implementation in the models strongly affects the size and chemical composition of the 13C-pocket, and consequently the final nucleosynthesis of the star [3,4,5,6].
In order to better understand the behavior of CBM over the long time scale, and particularly its relation to nuclear burning and fuel exhaustion, we have produced a new set of hydrodynamic simulations with the PROMPI code [7], following the evolution of a neon-burning shell in a 20 M star continuously from its early development to fuel exhaustion, assuming initial conditions from a state-of-the-art 1D stellar model [8]. Although this is a different environment than what found in AGB stars, we believe that significant information about CBM can be extracted that has a more general validity. We present here the evolution of this shell and its entrainment over time, and we draw a comparison with similar studies available in the literature.

2. Methods

The four simulations presented in this work were run with the stellar hydrodynamical code PROMPI [7], starting from the same initial conditions assumed from a 1D stellar evolution model of a 20 M star run with the MESA code [9]. The 1D model assumes solar metallicity, Schwarzschild criterion and exponential decaying overshoot for all convective boundaries (see [8] for more details). The structure of the neon-burning shell, namely its density, temperature, and composition, was remapped onto a wedge in spherical geometry, of radius 3.6– 8.5 × 10 8 cm and angular size 26°. The 3D simulations were then run with a numerical resolution of 256 × 128 2 cells.
In the 3D hydrodynamic simulations, an explicit nuclear network is used for reproducing nuclear energy generation, including the isotopes n, p, 4He, 12C, 16O, 20Ne, 23Na, 24Mg, 28Si, 31P, 32S, and 56Ni. This extended network is used here only for reproducing neon burning, but it can potentially cover all the energy-generating nuclear reactions from helium to oxygen burning. The four 3D simulations differ by the nuclear reaction rates, which were multiplied by a ‘boosting factor’, a constant value that increases energy generation. Boosting the stellar luminosity is commonly carried out in hydrodynamic codes in order to accelerate the simulations by increasing the convective speed and reducing the computation cost (e.g., [10]).
Here, we present four hydrodynamic simulations run with boosting factors 1 (nominal luminosity), 5, 10, and 50 (see [8] for more details). It is important that we include a simulation that was not boosted (boosting factor equals 1) in order to have consistent results comparable with the 1D model.

3. Results

In order to visualize the output of the simulations, we show a vertical cross-section from one of the simulations in Figure 1, run at nominal luminosity with a resolution of 2048 × 1024 2 . The figure shows the neon mass fraction in color scale, and includes the convective region in the center of the domain, characterized by plumes and eddies, surrounded by stable radiative regions. In addition, it is possible to see the entrainment of neon-rich material (in red) in the top-right corner.
We also show the time evolution of the four simulations in Figure 2, which represents the angularly averaged kinetic energy (in color scale) along the radius as a function of time. Each panel shows a simulation with a different boosting factor, from 1 in the top-left panel to 50 in the bottom-right one. The boosting has an effect on both the time scale of the simulations (x-axis), and the amount of kinetic energy produced (color scale). In all simulations, the convective zone in yellow gradually grows due to entrainment, until it stops growing when fuel is exhausted and convection halts. In these final phases, the gradual end of convection displays fluctuations between higher and lower levels of energy, as visible in the figure, before it finally stops. This is the first time in the literature that convection in hydrodynamic simulations stops due to fuel exhaustion, and these simulations show that entrainment does not proceed indefinitely, engulfing the stars, but it naturally halts when also convection dies.
Studying the evolution of the four simulations, we can parameterize turbulent entrainment with a simple law that relates the entrainment rate E, defined as the entrainment over the convective velocity v e / v rms , to the bulk Richardson number R i B , which represents a measure of the convective boundary stiffness. The law was defined by [7,11] through the free parameters A , n as E = A R i B n . We can use the new hydrodynamic simulations we presented here to estimate the free parameters A , n , by measuring E from Figure 2, and computing R i B by integrating the Brunt-Väisälä frequency across the convective boundary (see [12] for definitions and implementation).
In Figure 3, we show this new estimate of the entrainment rate (the line of best fit in log scale, blue) compared to another neon-shell from [12] (red), run for a shorter time scale, and entrainment estimated in the 1D models of [13]. In the legend, we give the estimated A and n for each work.
We can see from the plot that the three studies predict different slopes for the entrainment law. In particular, overshoot in 1D models is always found to be much slower that in hydrodynamic simulations. On the other hand, 3D models of stars have such short time scales that it is not guaranteed that entrainment will reach an equilibrium status. The difference between the two 3D models in Figure 3 is that the one from [12] (red) was run for a fraction of the shell evolution, while the one presented here (blue) was run for the entire shell lifetime. Indeed, the steeper slope found here makes entrainment compatible with both 1D models at large R i B and 3D models at small R i B . This is because hydrodynamic models are the best for simulating late phases of massive stars, where R i B is small, while 1D models are better constrained during the main sequence, when R i B is large. In this sense, the new entrainment law found here could explain CBM in both 1D and 3D models.

4. Discussion

We presented here a new set of 3D hydrodynamic simulations of a neon-burning shell from a 20 M star, run with the PROMPI code. We have reproduced the entire evolution of the shell, from its early phases until fuel exhaustion, studying the interplay between nuclear reactions and turbulent convection, and constraining the convective boundary mixing (or overshoot) through the entrainment law.
The main conclusion of this work, as also described in [8], is that entrainment does not proceed indefinitely as a physical process, but it naturally halts when fuel is exhausted in the convective region and convection stops. This result is derived by 3D simulations based on a state-of-the-art 1D stellar model and validated by the fact that the nuclear energy generation rate was not modified in the nominal luminosity simulation. The entrainment law that is parameterized from the data presented here has a steeper slope than what was found in previous multi-D simulations of advanced phases, which did not cover the entire nuclear burning evolution.
These results are of great interest for their application to different fields in astrophysics, including AGB stars. Indeed, the exact amount of overshoot is expected to have a strong impact on the structure and evolution of AGB stars, considering that CBM under the convective envelope during the third dredge-up is shown to be essential for producing the 13C-pocket, while the importance of CBM under the He-intershell is still debated. Recent hydrodynamic studies (e.g., [8,12,14,15]), including the one presented here, seem to suggest that entrainment could be more vigorous compared to traditional prescriptions; therefore, its impact on the physics of AGB stars could be remarkable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.R., R.H., V.V., W.D.A., C.G., C.M., M.M., A.S.M. and T.R.; methodology, F.R., R.H., V.V., W.D.A., C.G., C.M., M.M., A.S.M. and T.R.; software, F.R., W.D.A., C.G., C.M., R.H. and M.M.; validation, F.R., R.H., W.D.A., C.G., M.M., A.S.M. and T.R.; formal analysis, F.R., R.H. and V.V.; investigation, F.R., R.H. and V.V.; resources, R.H., W.D.A., C.M. and M.M.; data curation, F.R., R.H. and C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, F.R., R.H., V.V., W.D.A., C.G., C.M., M.M., A.S.M. and T.R.; writing—review and editing, F.R., R.H., V.V., W.D.A., C.G., C.M., M.M., A.S.M. and T.R.; visualization, F.R., R.H. and V.V.; supervision, F.R., R.H., W.D.A., C.G., A.S.M. and T.R.; project administration, F.R. and R.H.; funding acquisition, R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

FR acknowledges the grant PRIN project No. 2022X4TM3H ‘Cosmic POT’ from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca (MUR). RH acknowledges support from the World Premier International Research Centre Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan, the IReNA AccelNet Network of Networks (National Science Foundation, Grant No. OISE-1927130), and the Wolfson Foundation. WDA acknowledges support from the Theoretical Astrophysics Program (TAP) at the University of Arizona and Steward Observatory. CG received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant No. 833925). The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with Registration No. SC005336. This article was based upon work from the ChETEC COST Action (CA16117) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (ChETEC-INFRA, Grant No. 101008324). The authors acknowledge the STFC DiRAC HPC Facility at Durham University, UK (Grants ST/P002293/1, ST/R002371/1, ST/R000832/1, ST/K00042X/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/ K00087X/1, and ST/K003267/1).

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Casey A. Meakin is employed by Pasadena Consulting Group. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Böhm-Vitense, E. Über die Wasserstoffkonvektionszone in Sternen verschiedener Effektivtemperaturen und Leuchtkräfte. Z. Astrophys. 1958, 46, 108. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zahn, J.P. Convective penetration in stellar interiors. Astron. Astrophys. 1991, 252, 179. [Google Scholar]
  3. Herwig, F.; Bloecker, T.; Schoenberner, D.; El Eid, M. Stellar evolution of low and intermediate-mass stars. IV. Hydrodynamically-based overshoot and nucleosynthesis in AGB stars. Astron. Astrophys. 1997, 324, L81. [Google Scholar]
  4. Herwig, F.; Freytag, B.; Fuchs, T.; Hansen, J.P.; Hueckstaedt, R.M.; Porter, D.H.; Timmes, F.X.; Woodward, P.R. Convective and Non-Convective Mixing in AGB Stars. Why Galaxies Care About AGB Stars Their Importance Actors Probes ASP Conf. Ser. 2007, 378, 43. [Google Scholar]
  5. Battino, U.; Pignatari, M.; Ritter, C.; Herwig, F.; Denisenkov, P.; Den Hartogh, J.W.; Trappitsch, R.; Hirschi, R.; Freytag, B.; Thielemann, F.; et al. Application of a Theory and Simulation-based Convective Boundary Mixing Model for AGB Star Evolution and Nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. 2016, 827, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Battino, U.; Tattersall, A.; Lederer-Woods, C.; Herwig, F.; Denissenkov, P.; Hirschi, R.; Trappitsch, R.; den Hartogh, J.W.; Pignatari, M.; NuGrid Collaboration. NuGrid stellar data set - III. Updated low-mass AGB models and s-process nucleosynthesis with metallicities Z= 0.01, Z = 0.02, and Z = 0.03. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 489, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meakin, C.A.; Arnett, D. Turbulent Convection in Stellar Interiors. I. Hydrodynamic Simulation. Astrophys. J. 2007, 667, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rizzuti, F.; Hirschi, R.; Arnett, W.D.; Georgy, C.; Meakin, C.; Murphy, A.S.; Rauscher, T.; Varma, V. 3D stellar evolution: Hydrodynamic simulations of a complete burning phase in a massive star. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 523, 2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paxton, B.; Bildsten, L.; Dotter, A.; Herwig, F.; Lesaffre, P.; Timmes, F. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA). Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2011, 192, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cristini, A.; Hirschi, R.; Meakin, C.; Arnett, D.; Georgy, C.; Walkington, I. Dependence of convective boundary mixing on boundary properties and turbulence strength. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 484, 4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fernando, H.J.S. Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1991, 23, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rizzuti, F.; Hirschi, R.; Georgy, C.; Arnett, W.D.; Meakin, C.; Murphy, A.S. Realistic 3D hydrodynamics simulations find significant turbulent entrainment in massive stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 515, 4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Scott, L.J.A.; Hirschi, R.; Georgy, C.; Arnett, W.D.; Meakin, C.; Kaiser, E.A.; Ekström, S.; Yusof, N. Convective core entrainment in 1D main sequence stellar models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 503, 4208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Georgy, C.; Rizzuti, F.; Hirschi, R.; Varma, V.; Arnett, W.D.; Meakin, C.; Mocak, M.; Murphy, A.S.; Rauscher, T. 3D simulations of a neon burning convective shell in a massive star. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2024, 531, 4293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rizzuti, F.; Hirschi, R.; Varma, V.; Arnett, W.D.; Georgy, C.; Meakin, C.; Mocák, M.; Murphy, A.S.; Rauscher, T. Shell mergers in the late stages of massive star evolution: New insight from 3D hydrodynamic simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2024, 533, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Vertical cross-section of the neon mass fraction (in color scale), taken from the high-resolution nominal luminosity simulation after 10,033 s. The plot shows entrainment of neon-rich material from the upper stable region into the convective zone.
Figure 1. Vertical cross-section of the neon mass fraction (in color scale), taken from the high-resolution nominal luminosity simulation after 10,033 s. The plot shows entrainment of neon-rich material from the upper stable region into the convective zone.
Galaxies 12 00087 g001
Figure 2. Time evolution of the angularly averaged kinetic energy (in color scale) for four simulations with different luminosity (from top left to bottom right, boosting factor 1, 5, 10, 50). In yellow, the convective zone grows with time due to entrainment. In white, the isomass contours.
Figure 2. Time evolution of the angularly averaged kinetic energy (in color scale) for four simulations with different luminosity (from top left to bottom right, boosting factor 1, 5, 10, 50). In yellow, the convective zone grows with time due to entrainment. In white, the isomass contours.
Galaxies 12 00087 g002
Figure 3. Entrainment rate vs. bulk Richardson number and linear regressions: MESA Ne-shell from this study (blue), GENEC Ne-shell from [12] (red), and H-core from 1D [13] (black). Triangles are lower convective boundaries; circles are upper boundaries. The dashed vertical line is the convective H-core. Error bars are standard deviations, and the shaded regions are parameter uncertainties (only slope uncertainty for GENEC Ne-shell, since amplitude error is too large in log scale).
Figure 3. Entrainment rate vs. bulk Richardson number and linear regressions: MESA Ne-shell from this study (blue), GENEC Ne-shell from [12] (red), and H-core from 1D [13] (black). Triangles are lower convective boundaries; circles are upper boundaries. The dashed vertical line is the convective H-core. Error bars are standard deviations, and the shaded regions are parameter uncertainties (only slope uncertainty for GENEC Ne-shell, since amplitude error is too large in log scale).
Galaxies 12 00087 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rizzuti, F.; Hirschi, R.; Varma, V.; Arnett, W.D.; Georgy, C.; Meakin, C.; Mocák, M.; Murphy, A.S.; Rauscher, T. Stellar Evolution and Convection in 3D Hydrodynamic Simulations of a Complete Burning Phase. Galaxies 2024, 12, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060087

AMA Style

Rizzuti F, Hirschi R, Varma V, Arnett WD, Georgy C, Meakin C, Mocák M, Murphy AS, Rauscher T. Stellar Evolution and Convection in 3D Hydrodynamic Simulations of a Complete Burning Phase. Galaxies. 2024; 12(6):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rizzuti, Federico, Raphael Hirschi, Vishnu Varma, William David Arnett, Cyril Georgy, Casey Meakin, Miroslav Mocák, Alexander StJ. Murphy, and Thomas Rauscher. 2024. "Stellar Evolution and Convection in 3D Hydrodynamic Simulations of a Complete Burning Phase" Galaxies 12, no. 6: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060087

APA Style

Rizzuti, F., Hirschi, R., Varma, V., Arnett, W. D., Georgy, C., Meakin, C., Mocák, M., Murphy, A. S., & Rauscher, T. (2024). Stellar Evolution and Convection in 3D Hydrodynamic Simulations of a Complete Burning Phase. Galaxies, 12(6), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop