Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Habitability and Stellar Habitable Zones from Observed Exoplanets
Next Article in Special Issue
Stellar Evolution and Convection in 3D Hydrodynamic Simulations of a Complete Burning Phase
Previous Article in Journal
On the Ionization Tolerance of C20 Fullerene in Ground and Excited Electronic States in Planetary Nebulae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dusty Common Envelope Evolution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Insight on AGB Mass-Loss and Dust Production from PNe

1
Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università Degli Studi Roma Tre, Via Della Vasca Navale 84, 00100 Roma, Italy
2
Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Observatory of Rome, Via Frascati 33, 00077 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy
3
LNF—Laboratori Nazionali Fascati, Via Enrico Fermi, 54, 00044 Frascati, Italy
Galaxies 2024, 12(6), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060085
Submission received: 15 September 2024 / Revised: 8 November 2024 / Accepted: 26 November 2024 / Published: 2 December 2024

Abstract

:
The asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase, experienced by low- and intermediate-mass stars (LIMSs), plays a crucial role in galaxies due to its significant dust production. Planetary nebulae (PNe) offer a novel perspective, providing valuable insights into the dust production mechanisms and the evolutionary history of LIMSs. We selected a sample of nine PNe from the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), likely originating from single stars. By modeling their spectral energy distributions (SEDs) with photoionization techniques, we successfully reproduced the observed photometric data, spectra, and chemical abundances. This approach enabled us to constrain key characteristics of the central stars (CSs), dust, and gaseous nebulae, which were then compared with predictions from stellar evolution models. By integrating observational data across ultraviolet (UV) to infrared (IR) wavelengths, we achieved a comprehensive understanding of the structure of the PNe in our sample. The results of the SED analysis are consistent with evolutionary models and previous studies that focus on individual components of the PN, such as dust or the gaseous nebula. Our analysis enabled us to determine the metallicity, the progenitor mass of the CSs, and the amount of dust and gas surrounding the CSs, linking these properties to the previous AGB phase. The PN phase provides critical insights into the physical processes active during earlier evolutionary stages. Additionally, we found that higher progenitor masses are associated with greater amounts of dust in the surrounding nebulae but lower amounts of gaseous material compared to sources with lower progenitor masses.

1. Introduction

The study of LIMSs, characterized by masses ranging from 1 to 8 M , has witnessed growing interest from the scientific community with the aim of assessing the role that LIMSs play in enriching the interstellar medium. Indeed, during the AGB phase, the stars lose a significant amount of mass via stellar wind, and are therefore characterized by expanded circumstellar envelopes that are sites of substantial dust formation. The material ejected reflects the physical processes active throughout the AGB evolution, during which the stars significantly alter their surface chemical abundances [1,2]. For instance, the third dredge-up (TDU) [3] increases the surface abundance of 12C in stars with masses below ~ 4   M , while hot bottom burning (HBB) [4] primarily depletes 12C and synthesizes 14N in stars with masses above ~ 4   M .
Knowledge of the surface chemical composition, in particular the excess of C over O, is crucial for predicting the mineralogy of dust formed throughout the AGB phase. Indeed, stars that experience repeated TDU episodes can reach the carbon star stage, producing carbon-rich dust. In contrast, stars undergoing HBB, characterized by O-rich atmospheres, produce silicate-rich dust and are known as oxygen stars.
The material expelled during the AGB phase remains observable in the subsequent PN stage, marked by chemical signatures that act as precise indicators of the processes involved in stellar evolution, nucleosynthesis, and dust formation during the AGB phase [5,6]. Building on this foundation, Dell’Agli et al. [7] and Tosi et al. [8] investigated a range of spectral regions, from UV to IR wavelengths, to uncover key characteristics of the CS, as well as the dust and gas components within PNe. These findings were subsequently compared with ATON [9,10] theoretical model predictions, enabling the tracing of the progenitor mass of each source [8] and establishing connections between the physical conditions of the gas and dust in the PN environment and the final phases of the AGB stage [11].
The present manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the results gathered by our team, with the goal of constructing an evolutionary framework that describes the transition of low- and intermediate-mass stars (LIMSs) from the AGB phase to the PN stage. We begin with a brief introduction to the sample and methodology, followed by a discussion of new findings that build on the results presented in Tosi et al. [8].

2. Sample and Methodology

We selected targets from the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), which, due to its well-constrained distance [12], provides an optimal setting for accurately determining luminosities and initial stellar masses. We focused on sources exhibiting round or elliptical morphologies, as identified through Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging [13,14,15,16], to exclude close binary systems whose evolution might deviate significantly from that of single stars. Our final sample included seven LMC PNe with infrared spectra, enabling a direct evaluation of the dust present within the nebulae.
The analysis presented here is based on infrared spectra obtained using the Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph (IRS; LS07), ultraviolet spectra from the HST/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS, hereafter LS05) [17], and complementary photometric data [18,19,20]. Additionally, where available, carbon and oxygen abundance measurements were taken from the LS05, Leisy and Dennefeld [21], and Henry et al. [22]. We note that all the photometric data and the HST spectra were corrected for galactic foreground and LMC extinction using the parametrization provided in Stanghellini et al. [17].
The observational data points were essential for conducting photoionization and radiative transfer modeling using the spectral synthesis code CLOUDY v22.02 [23], facilitating the production of reliable synthetic SEDs. As described in Tosi et al. [8], through the reconstruction of the SED from the UV to the IR, we examined in detail the contributions of the CS, gaseous nebula, and warm dust peaking around 100 K.
The SED characterization provided crucial parameters for comparison with stellar evolution models, including the luminosity (L) and effective temperature of the central stars (Teff), as well as the mineral composition of the surrounding warm dust (carbon- or oxygen-rich) and the amount of gas and warm dust surrounding the central star ( M gas and M dust , respectively), along with their ratio (dust-to-gas ratio, δ C ). In this process, we leveraged insights from previous studies that analyzed the dust features of most of the sources in our sample [24,25,26]. These insights were instrumental in enhancing the reliability of our dust modeling, which, alongside our characterization of the CS and gas components, allowed us to develop an overall view of the entire PN.
This comprehensive perspective was essential for comparisons with the results from stellar evolution models, enabling a deeper understanding of the relationships between observed data and theoretical predictions. To facilitate robust comparisons with stellar evolution models, we first needed to map the evolutionary path of each CS. This process began by determining the metallicity of each source, achieved by comparing observed oxygen abundances with predictions from the ATON stellar evolution code [9]. We then inferred the progenitor mass using a combined approach: first, by comparing observed carbon abundances with ATON model predictions (see Figure 7 [8]), and second, by matching the luminosity and effective temperature derived from SED modeling to ATON evolutionary tracks (see Figure 5 [8]). After establishing the evolutionary history, we were able to compare observed dust masses to theoretical values, leveraging the AGB dust formation model incorporated in ATON through the formalism of [10,27].

3. Discussion

Through photoionization modeling and comparisons with ATON stellar evolution models, we identified seven sources that exhibit signs of repeated TDU episodes and the presence of carbon-rich dust (see [8] for more details on this procedure). In the left panel of Figure 1, we explore the relationship between the progenitor’s mass ( M / M , measured at the beginning of the AGB phase), the dust-to-gas ratio of warm dust ( δ C ), and the effective temperature (Teff). Different symbols represent the varying metallicities of each PN in our sample (triangles, Z = 8 × 10 3 ; circles, Z = 4 × 10 3 ; and squares, Z = 2 × 10 3 ).
Several studies have demonstrated that more massive carbon-rich stars can produce larger amounts of dust compared to their lower mass counterparts, due to the greater number of TDU episodes during the AGB phase [28,29,30]. Given that the dust observed in the PN phase reflects prior AGB evolution [7], we would expect to see a similar relationship within our sample. Consistent with this expectation, we observe that more massive stars are characterized by higher values of δ C (see left panel, Figure 1). However, this behavior appears to be influenced by additional mechanisms. For instance, considering two sources of similar metallicity, such as SMP LMC 71 and SMP LMC 4, we would expect the more massive star to exhibit higher dust quantities during the PN phase based on their mass loss histories. As illustrated by the color-coding in Figure 1, the sources with the most significant dust reduction also have the highest Teff, suggesting the possibility of active dust destruction events that considerably diminished the amount of dust surrounding the central star in our hottest sources. Various mechanisms, such as spallation and sputtering, have been proposed by the scientific community to explain the observed lower amounts of dust compared to model predictions [31,32]. Nevertheless, as highlighted by Otsuka et al. [33], incorporating the emission from cold dust, peaking around 20 K, into the SED modeling could yield a higher dust-to-gas ratio. This approach could narrow the gap between observed dust quantities and model predictions.
Given the larger envelopes typical of more massive AGB stars, we might expect more massive PNe to exhibit greater gas masses. However, the right panel of Figure 1 reveals the opposite: the nebular mass surrounding these more massive sources is the lowest within the sample. Possible explanations include efficient mass loss during the AGB phase, which left minimal traces of the gas ejected during this period, or a weakening in the emission explored in the present manuscript, which makes detection challenging. In contrast, this reduction in the gaseous nebula emission is not observed in lower mass stars, for which the SED analysis indicates gas masses consistent with those expected to be produced during the final thermal pulse.
Further insights can be drawn from Figure 2, which illustrates the amount of carbon-rich dust (Mdust) in the PNe of the sample as a function of the progenitor’s mass, with different colors representing various metallicities. Solid squares depict the dust quantities derived from SED modeling, while open symbols correspond to predictions from the ATON stellar evolution models. Specifically, the open circle represents the total dust produced throughout the entire AGB phase, the open triangle indicates the dust produced during the last two thermal pulses, and the open square reflects the dust generated during the final thermal pulse.
As shown in Figure 2, sources with metallicities above Z > 2 × 10 3 and higher progenitor masses tend to exhibit greater dust masses. However, the two hottest sources in our sample (SMP LMC 102 and SMP LMC 71) show dust masses that are significantly lower than those predicted by synthetic models. Regarding the metal-poor sources (Z = 2 × 10 3 ), the Mdust vs. M trend appears to deviate, except for SMP LMC 18, which, as discussed in Tosi et al. [8], underwent a late thermal pulse that altered its dust composition. We propose that the larger amounts of dust observed in SMP LMC 25 and SMP LMC 34, compared to ATON predictions, could have a similar explanation to that discussed in Tosi et al. [34] and Tosi et al. [35]. In those studies, reproducing the observed dust around metal-poor, low-mass post-AGB stars necessitated increasing the mass loss rate at the end of the AGB phase by a factor of three or four, typically reaching values of 3 4 × 10 5 M / yr. This enhanced mass loss rate is attributed to the higher availability of carbon for condensation into carbonaceous dust, which is related to the lower oxygen abundance due to the lower metallicity compared to metal-rich sources.
We conclude that the dust and gas surrounding the central star in PNe reflect the star’s previous evolutionary history, providing valuable insights into key aspects of LIMSs, such as the mass loss and dust production history. For a more detailed discussion of the results presented in this study, refer to Dell’Agli et al. [7], Tosi et al. [8], and Ventura et al. [11].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This article is based upon work from European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action NanoSpace, CA21126, supported by COST.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Karakas, A.I.; Lattanzio, J.C. The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars. PASA 2014, 31, e030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ventura, P.; Dell’Agli, F.; Tailo, M.; Castellani, M.; Marini, E.; Tosi, S.; Di Criscienzo, M. Nucleosynthesis, Mixing Processes, and Gas Pollution from AGB Stars. Universe 2022, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iben, I., Jr. Post main sequence evolution of single stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1974, 12, 215–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sackmann, I.J.; Boothroyd, A.I. The Creation of Superrich Lithium Giants. Astrophys. J. 1992, 392, L71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ventura, P.; Stanghellini, L.; Dell’Agli, F.; García-Hernández, D.A.; Di Criscienzo, M. A test for asymptotic giant branch evolution theories: Planetary nebulae in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 452, 3679–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ventura, P.; Stanghellini, L.; Di Criscienzo, M.; García-Hernández, D.A.; Dell’Agli, F. Planetary nebulae in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 460, 3940–3949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dell’Agli, F.; Tosi, S.; Kamath, D.; Stanghellini, L.; Bianchi, S.; Ventura, P.; Marini, E.; García-Hernández, D.A. Dust from evolved stars: A pilot analysis of the AGB to PN transition. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 526, 5386–5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tosi, S.; Dell’Agli, F.; Kamath, D.; Stanghellini, L.; Ventura, P.; Bianchi, S.; Gómez-Muñoz, M.A.; García-Hernández, D.A. Planetary nebulae of the Large Magellanic Cloud. I. A multiwavelength analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 688, A36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ventura, P.; Zeppieri, A.; Mazzitelli, I.; D’Antona, F. Full spectrum of turbulence convective mixing: I. theoretical main sequences and turn-off for 0.6 ÷ 15 M. Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 334, 953–968. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ventura, P.; di Criscienzo, M.; Schneider, R.; Carini, R.; Valiante, R.; D’Antona, F.; Gallerani, S.; Maiolino, R.; Tornambé, A. The transition from carbon dust to silicate production in low-metallicity asymptotic giant branch and super-asymptotic giant branch stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 420, 1442–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ventura, P.; Tosi, S.; García-Hernández, D.A.; Dell’Agli, F.; Kamath, D.; Stanghellini, L.; Bianchi, S.; Tailo, M.; Gómez-Muñoz, M.A. Planetary Nebulae of the Large Magellanic Cloud II: The connection with the progenitors’ properties. Astron. Astrophys. 2024; submitted. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pietrzyński, G.; Graczyk, D.; Gallenne, A.; Gieren, W.; Thompson, I.B.; Pilecki, B.; Karczmarek, P.; Górski, M.; Suchomska, K.; Taormina, M.; et al. A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent. Nature 2019, 567, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shaw, R.A.; Stanghellini, L.; Mutchler, M.; Balick, B.; Blades, J.C. Morphology and Evolution of the Large Magellanic Cloud Planetary Nebulae. Astrophys. J. 2001, 548, 727–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shaw, R.A.; Stanghellini, L.; Villaver, E.; Mutchler, M. Hubble Space Telescope Images of Magellanic Cloud Planetary Nebulae. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2006, 167, 201–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stanghellini, L.; Blades, J.C.; Osmer, S.J.; Barlow, M.J.; Liu, X.W. Hubble Space Telescope Images of Magellanic Cloud Planetary Nebulae: Data and Correlations across Morphological Classes. Astrophys. J. 1999, 510, 687–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stanghellini, L.; Villaver, E.; Manchado, A.; Guerrero, M.A. The Correlations between Planetary Nebula Morphology and Central Star Evolution: Analysis of the Northern Galactic Sample. Astrophys. J. 2002, 576, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stanghellini, L.; Shaw, R.A.; Gilmore, D. Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph Ultraviolet Spectra of Large Magellanic Cloud Planetary Nebulae: A Study of Carbon Abundances and Stellar Evolution. Astrophys. J. 2005, 622, 294–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reid, W.A. A multiwavelength analysis of planetary nebulae in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 438, 2642–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cutri, R.M.; Wright, E.L.; Conrow, T.; Bauer, J.; Benford, D.; Brandenburg, H.; Dailey, J.; Eisenhardt, P.R.M.; Evans, T.; Fajardo-Acosta, S.; et al. Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products. Explan. Suppl. Wise-All-Sky Data Release Prod. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lasker, B.M.; Lattanzi, M.G.; McLean, B.J.; Bucciarelli, B.; Drimmel, R.; Garcia, J.; Greene, G.; Guglielmetti, F.; Hanley, C.; Hawkins, G.; et al. The Second-Generation Guide Star Catalog: Description and Properties. Astron. J. 2008, 136, 735–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leisy, P.; Dennefeld, M. Planetary nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds. II. Abundances and element production. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 456, 451–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Henry, R.B.C.; Liebert, J.; Boroson, T.A. Faint Planetary Nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds: Central Star Properties and Nebular Abundances for the Jacoby Sample. Astrophys. J. 1989, 339, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ferland, G.J.; Chatzikos, M.; Guzmán, F.; Lykins, M.L.; van Hoof, P.A.M.; Williams, R.J.R.; Abel, N.P.; Badnell, N.R.; Keenan, F.P.; Porter, R.L.; et al. The 2017 Release Cloudy. Rev. Mex. Astron. AstrofíSica 2017, 53, 385–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stanghellini, L.; García-Lario, P.; García-Hernández, D.A.; Perea-Calderón, J.V.; Davies, J.E.; Manchado, A.; Villaver, E.; Shaw, R.A. Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph Observations of Magellanic Cloud Planetary Nebulae: The Nature of Dust in Low-Metallicity Circumstellar Ejecta. Astrophys. J. 2007, 671, 1669–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sloan, G.C.; Lagadec, E.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Kraemer, K.E.; Weis, A.P.; Matsuura, M.; Volk, K.; Peeters, E.; Duley, W.W.; Cami, J.; et al. Carbon-rich Dust Past the Asymptotic Giant Branch: Aliphatics, Aromatics, and Fullerenes in the Magellanic Clouds. Astrophys. J. 2014, 791, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. García-Hernández, D.A.; Villaver, E.; García-Lario, P.; Acosta-Pulido, J.A.; Manchado, A.; Stanghellini, L.; Shaw, R.A.; Cataldo, F. Infrared Study of Fullerene Planetary Nebulae. Astrophys. J. 2012, 760, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ferrarotti, A.S.; Gail, H.P. Mineral formation in stellar winds. II. Effects of Mg/Si abundance variations on dust composition in AGB stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2001, 371, 133–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ventura, P.; Dell’Agli, F.; Schneider, R.; Di Criscienzo, M.; Rossi, C.; La Franca, F.; Gallerani, S.; Valiante, R. Dust from asymptotic giant branch stars: Relevant factors and modelling uncertainties. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 439, 977–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ventura, P.; Karakas, A.; Dell’Agli, F.; García-Hernández, D.A.; Guzman-Ramirez, L. Gas and dust from solar metallicity AGB stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 475, 2282–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dell’Agli, F.; Valiante, R.; Kamath, D.; Ventura, P.; García-Hernández, D.A. AGB dust and gas ejecta in extremely metal-poor environments. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 486, 4738–4752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Osterbrock, D.E.; Ferland, G.J. Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei; University Science Books: Sausalito, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  32. Natta, A.; Panagia, N. Dust in planetary nebulae. Astrophys. J. 1981, 248, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Otsuka, M.; Ueta, T.; van Hoof, P.A.M.; Sahai, R.; Aleman, I.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Chu, Y.H.; Villaver, E.; Leal-Ferreira, M.L.; Kastner, J.; et al. The Herschel Planetary Nebula Survey (HerPlaNS): A Comprehensive Dusty Photoionization Model of NGC6781. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2017, 231, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tosi, S.; Dell’Agli, F.; Kamath, D.; Ventura, P.; Van Winckel, H.; Marini, E. Understanding dust production and mass loss in the AGB phase using post-AGB stars in the Magellanic Clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 668, A22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tosi, S.; Kamath, D.; Dell’Agli, F.; Van Winckel, H.; Ventura, P.; Marchetti, T.; Marini, E.; Tailo, M. A study of carbon-rich post-AGB stars in the Milky Way to understand the production of carbonaceous dust from evolved stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 673, A41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Left panel: Dust-to-gas ratio of carbon dust sources as a function of the progenitor mass and effective temperature, with different symbols representing the various metallicities of the PNe. Right panel: Gaseous mass of the nebula as a function of the progenitor mass. In both panels, the masses are expressed at the beginning of the AGB phase.
Figure 1. Left panel: Dust-to-gas ratio of carbon dust sources as a function of the progenitor mass and effective temperature, with different symbols representing the various metallicities of the PNe. Right panel: Gaseous mass of the nebula as a function of the progenitor mass. In both panels, the masses are expressed at the beginning of the AGB phase.
Galaxies 12 00085 g001
Figure 2. Dust mass of carbon dust sources as a function of the progenitor mass, with different colors representing various metallicities. Solid symbols indicate dust amounts derived from SED modeling, while open symbols correspond to dust quantities predicted by the ATON synthetic models: circles represent dust produced during the entire AGB phase, triangles for the last two thermal pulses, and squares for the final thermal pulse. The progenitor’s masses are expressed at the beginning of the AGB phase.
Figure 2. Dust mass of carbon dust sources as a function of the progenitor mass, with different colors representing various metallicities. Solid symbols indicate dust amounts derived from SED modeling, while open symbols correspond to dust quantities predicted by the ATON synthetic models: circles represent dust produced during the entire AGB phase, triangles for the last two thermal pulses, and squares for the final thermal pulse. The progenitor’s masses are expressed at the beginning of the AGB phase.
Galaxies 12 00085 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tosi, S. Insight on AGB Mass-Loss and Dust Production from PNe. Galaxies 2024, 12, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060085

AMA Style

Tosi S. Insight on AGB Mass-Loss and Dust Production from PNe. Galaxies. 2024; 12(6):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tosi, Silvia. 2024. "Insight on AGB Mass-Loss and Dust Production from PNe" Galaxies 12, no. 6: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060085

APA Style

Tosi, S. (2024). Insight on AGB Mass-Loss and Dust Production from PNe. Galaxies, 12(6), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12060085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop