Abstract
Background: Microvascular thrombosis following free tissue transfer presents a complex challenge for surgeons and carries the potential risk of flap failure. The application of fibrinolytic agents represents a robust therapeutic option. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical use of fibrinolytic drugs in the rescue of compromised free flaps. Methods: A systematic literature search for clinical studies detailing the utilization of fibrinolytic agents for salvaging free flaps was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed English-language publications that specifically addressed the clinical application of fibrinolytic agents for free-flap salvage. Results: A total of 331 articles were screened after excluding duplicates, with 56 meeting the inclusion criteria. Among these, 21 were clinical trials (evidence level III), and 35 were case studies (evidence level IV/V). In total, 459 flaps underwent treatment with fibrinolytic agents. Conclusion: The application of fibrinolytic agents appears to be a valuable intervention for rescuing compromised free flaps attributable to microvascular compromise. Notably, no prospective randomized trials have been published on this subject, and the evidence within the existing literature is characterized by its limited and heterogeneous nature. Further research is imperative to gather data on the efficacy, dosage, and safety profile of fibrinolytic agents.
    1. Introduction
The introduction of free-flap surgery brought a paradigm shift in reconstructive surgery, offering unparalleled outcomes for patients undergoing tissue reconstruction following congenital anomalies, trauma, or tumor resection. The success rate of complex tissue reconstruction using free flaps has consistently increased over the last 30 years, according to several studies currently exceeding 95 percent [,,,,,,]. However, despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, free tissue transfer is not without the risk of several complications, including microvascular and peri-anastomotic thrombosis, leading to flap failure, necrosis, and subsequent patient morbidity. Prompt intervention is essential to salvage tissue viability and prevent adverse outcomes in such cases [,]. Literature suggests that the critical window for successful flap salvage is within 48 h after surgery []. Fibrinolytic agents have emerged as vital adjuncts in the arsenal of reconstructive surgeons for managing compromised flaps after free-flap surgery [,]. These cause fibrin clots to dissolve, thereby restoring the blood flow to the ischemic tissue. Among the various fibrinolytic agents, streptokinase, urokinase, acylated plasminogen, streptokinase activator complex, and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) have attracted considerable attention due to their efficacy and safety profiles in clinical practice [,]. Streptokinase, a bacteria-derived fibrinolytic agent, functions by forming a complex with plasminogen and converting it into plasmin, the active enzyme responsible for fibrinolysis. Its wide-ranging activity makes it suitable for managing compromised flaps, particularly in cases of extensive thrombosis. Urokinase acts directly on plasminogens to generate plasmin, facilitating clot dissolution. Its rapid onset of action and minimal systemic side effects make it the preferred choice for managing acute flap ischemia []. Acylated plasminogen, a modified form of native plasminogen, offers enhanced stability and specificity for fibrinolytic activity. Its synthetic nature allows for precise dosing and targeted fibrinolysis, making it a promising option for flap salvage procedures. The streptokinase activator complex, a recombinant protein engineered to mimic the action of streptokinase, presents a safer alternative with reduced immunogenicity and improved pharmacokinetic properties. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), a crucial regulator of endogenous fibrinolysis, has shown remarkable efficacy in restoring blood flow to compromised flaps. Its selective targeting of fibrin-rich thrombi minimizes systemic bleeding complications, making it an attractive option for salvage procedures in free-flap surgery. The development of recombinant tPA variants has further refined its clinical utility, offering improved stability and enhanced fibrin specificity [,]. While fibrinolytic agents hold significant promise in managing compromised flaps, their clinical use necessitates careful consideration of patient-specific factors, such as the extent of ischemia, underlying comorbidities, and risk of bleeding complications. Additionally, optimal dosing regimens and administration protocols are areas of ongoing research that maximize efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.
In this systematic review, we aim to elucidate the current landscape of fibrinolytic agents in the clinical management of the salvage of compromised free flaps.
2. Methods
This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (protocol number = CRD42024503255). This study was conducted according to the guidelines on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [].
Search Strategy and Article Selection
A systematic literature search was performed using the online databases PubMed and Web of Science. The following search term strategy was used.
(“flap*” OR “tissue transfer” OR “microsurg*” OR “microvasc*”) AND (“streptokinase” OR “fibrin*” OR “urokinase” OR “rt-PA” OR “tissue plasminogen activator” OR “thromboly*”) AND (“salvage” OR “rescue”)
Additionally, the MeSH database on PubMed was screened using the following MeSH terms.
(“Surgical Flaps” [Mesh] OR “Myocutaneous Flap” [Mesh] OR “Free Tissue Flaps” [Mesh] OR “Perforator Flap” [Mesh]) AND (“Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator” [Mesh] OR “Fibrinolytic Agents” [Mesh] OR “Thrombolytic Therapy” [Mesh])
The literature search was performed in April 2024, with no restrictions concerning the publication year. The articles were then independently screened by three authors (P.M., R.W., and M.M.). Inclusion criteria were case studies, retrospective and prospective studies, interventional clinical studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials regarding the clinical use of fibrinolytic agents for flap salvage in humans in English or German. Exclusion criteria were reviews, editorials and opinion pieces, letters to the editor, study protocols, non-human studies, and cadaver studies. The authors (P.M. and M.M.) independently gathered all search results in an Excel file (Microsoft Excel 2016 32-bit, Redmond, WA, USA) and screened the literature according to the determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Afterward, they compared their data, and in case of any discrepancies, they reconciled with a third reviewer (A.H.). Information regarding the year of publication, authorship, number of cases, type of flaps, type of thrombosis, fibrinolytic agent used, method of application, timing of revision, flap survival, and adverse events was also collected. The articles were then subsequently categorized based on their level of evidence according to the 2011 American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) (Arlington Heights, IL, USA) Evidence Rating Scales [].
3. Results
3.1. Literature Search
The literature on PubMed and Web of Science search resulted in a total of 505 studies. Cross-referencing screening did not yield any supplementary articles in accordance with our search criteria and methodology. After the removal of duplicates, 330 records were included for screening. The titles, abstracts, and, if available, full-text articles were reviewed, resulting in the exclusion of 170 studies that did not align with the study question. The remaining 160 studies were screened using the stated inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twelve studies were excluded for not being in English or German, 57 studies were excluded for being reviews and letters, and 35 studies were excluded for being experimental studies. This resulted in 56 studies covering the clinical use of fibrinolytic agents for flap salvage (Figure 1). A brief overview is demonstrated in Table 1.
      
    
    Figure 1.
      PRISMA Flow Diagram. PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
  
       
    
    Table 1.
    Overview of reviewed articles.
  
3.2. Study Characteristics
The 56 studies included in the analysis were published from 1987 to 2023. The majority of the studies found were case reports (n = 25), followed by retrospective cohort studies (n = 21) and case series (n = 10), totaling 459 flaps treated with fibrinolytic agents for flap salvage following microvascular compromise. No randomized controlled trials or prospective studies were found.
3.3. Evidence Level
The 56 articles that met the inclusion criteria were classified based on their level of evidence. 25 studies were classified as level V, 10 as level IV, and 21 as level III, with 0 studies each for levels II and I.
3.4. Flap Survival
Of the 459 flaps treated with fibrinolytic agents, data on flap survival were missing for 27 flaps. Of the 432 patients with described outcomes, 272 (63%) were salvaged and 160 (37%) were lost.
3.5. Types of Flaps
All flaps were free flaps used for defect coverage of various sizes. Out of all 459 flaps, 285 (62.1%) were not further described regarding the type of flap. Among the described flaps, there were 26 (5.7%) adipocutaneous flaps, 57 (12.4%) fasciocutaneous flaps, 64 (13.9%) musculocutaneous flaps, 14 (3.1%) muscle flaps, 11 (2.4%) osteocutaneous flaps, and 2 (0.4%) bone flaps.
3.6. Type of Thrombosis
Among all 459 cases, information about the type of thrombosis was missing for 216. Of the 243 flaps with the described thrombosis types, 69 (28.4%) had arterial thrombosis, 146 (60.1%) had venous thrombosis, and 28 (11.5%) had both arterial and venous thrombosis.
3.7. Method of Application
In 238 (52%) cases, the method of administration was documented, and in 221 (48%) cases, no information was available about the method of application of the fibrinolytic agent, or the information was not assignable. The most common method of application was direct administration to the arterial pedicle, with 215 documented cases (90.3%). In 14 cases (5.9%), the fibrinolytic agent was administered subcutaneously or into the arterial pedicle. Specifically, in 4 cases (1.7%), the fibrinolytic agent was administered subcutaneously; in another 4 cases (1.7%), catheter-directed thrombolysis over 24 h was performed; and in 1 case (0.4%), the fibrinolytic agent was administered intravenously. Of the 215 cases in which the fibrinolytic agent was administered directly into the arterial pedicle, in 47 cases (21.9%), the surgeons allowed systemic circulation of the fibrinolytic agent; in 157 cases (73%), it was prevented in 11 cases (5.1%), and no information was provided. To prevent systemic circulation, the vein was either opened or clamped and sometimes both the artery and the vein were clamped.
3.8. Fibrinolytic Agents
The most used fibrinolytic agent was tissue plasminogen activator (tPa) [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,], with 176 (63.8%) described uses. The second most commonly used fibrinolytic agent was urokinase [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,], with 79 (28.6%) described uses, and the third was streptokinase [,,,,,,,,,,,], with 21 (7.6%) described uses. In 183 cases, the fibrinolytic agent used was not described properly for a quantitative analysis [,,,,,]. The distribution of salvaged and lost flaps concerning the fibrinolytic used, as properly described in the included studies, is illustrated in Figure 2. When tPa was used, the most common dosage ranged between 2 and 10 mg [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. Less than 2 mg (1 mg) was only used in one case []. More than 10 mg was administered in five cases [,,,], with the highest dose being 100 mg []. In 118 cases, the salvage rate after tPa usage was described, resulting in 85 (72.0%) successfully salvaged flaps and 33 (28.0%) lost flaps. In one study, two patients had to return to the operating theater due to bleeding complications [], one study described a mild periorbital hematoma [], another study monitored a small hematoma at the donor side [], and in one study, the patient required 10 packed red blood cell transfusions (pRBCt) []. Three studies [,,] stated that four flaps could only partially be saved. 12 Small skin and/or fat necrosis were seen in five studies [,,,,]. Three medium-to large-sized fat necroses were found in two studies (35,41). Senchenkov et al. [] also mention three fat necrosis. Another patient suffered from fibrous nonunion of a fibula flap that required surgical debridement 1 year after tPa admission []. When urokinase was used, the most common dosage ranged between 50.000 and 250.000 units [,,,,,,,,,,,,,]. In two cases, dosages of 300.000 [] and 400.000 [] were used. In 47 cases, the salvage rate after urokinase usage was described, resulting in 42 (89.4%) salvaged flaps and 5 (10.6%) lost flaps (Figure 2). Regarding bleeding complications, there were two cases with hematoma at the donor side [], and in the other two cases, there was a need for one packed red blood cell transfusion (pRBCt) each []. Three partial necrosis were described in two studies [,]. Serletti et al. [] listed two marginal losses of tissue, one fat necrosis and one fistula, as adverse events. There were also two extensive muscle necrosis [] and a 50% flap loss described [].
      
    
    Figure 2.
      Distribution of salvaged and lost flaps regarding used fibrinolytic. Streptokinase was used in 14, urokinase in 48, and tPa in 118 flap cases. tPa: tissue plasminogen activator.
  
The streptokinase dosages mostly ranged between 20.000 and 125.000 units [,,,,,,], with a dosage as low as 7500 only used in one case []. In 14 cases, the salvage rate after streptokinase usage was described, resulting in 12 (85.7%) salvaged flaps and 2 (14.3%) lost flaps (Figure 2). Regarding bleeding complications, there was a flap hematoma in one study [] and one small hematoma on the donor side in another study []. Two studies described a flap that was only partially salvaged (20% lost) [,], and another two studies described partial flap necrosis in two flaps [,]. Lastly, Noordanus et al. [] described a small, self-healing wound dehiscence. In 253 cases, it was not possible to distinguish between the fibrinolytic agents used and the respective outcomes, or there was no exact description of the fibrinolytic agent. In these 253 cases, 133 (53%) flaps were salvaged, and 120 (47%) flaps were lost.
In some studies, only the complications were described, but it was not possible to distinguish between the fibrinolytic agents used, or the fibrinolytic agent was simply not mentioned. To these complications count two flaps with necrosis [], 3 partial skin losses [], and in another two studies, one only partially saved flap in each [,].
4. Discussion
Within our systematic review, we were able to identify three main fibrinolytic agents used for free-flap salvage.
The most frequently used agent was tissue plasmin activator (tPA). As a serine protease enzyme, its main function is to convert plasminogen, arising from fibrin within the blood clot, to plasmin. Its pharmacology rests upon the breakdown of fibrin crosslinks through plasmin following the dissolution of intravascular blood clots []. The regular dosage of tPA for arterial thrombosis and emboli is 0.1 mg/kg body weight.
tPA was used in 118 cases with a dosage range of 2–10 mg, resulting in 85 salvaged free flaps with a low-to-moderate adverse events profile. The dosage of tPA was mostly lower than suggested in acute myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism, yet it has to be mentioned that the application was given as a bolus injection intra-arterially into the flap artery, with no or minimal systemic affection of tPA in the majority of reported cases. There was only one case of severe hemorrhage and the postoperative need for pRBCt. This single case was within a severe burn victim with the use of continuous tPA administration; hence, the indication was not to salvage a free flap but to prevent thromboembolic events due to burn trauma.
Even though urokinase is the most widespread fibrinolytic agent in interventional radiology, it was only the second most used fibrinolytic agent in free-flap salvage []. Urokinase directly cleaves unbound plasminogen in the arteriovenous system plasmin and is not dependent on fibrinogen to release fibrin-based plasminogen. With a total dosage range of 50.000 up to 250.000 units (regular initial dosage in thrombotic events: 4400 IU/kg as loading and 4400 IU/kg/h for 24 h as maintenance dose), 47 free flaps were treated with urokinase, of which 42 survived. Even though the half-life is about 15 min, in several cases within our review, major bleeding was reported; some of them needed pRBCt, indicating a systemic effect. Due to its short half-life, studies of pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction suggest that there is a potential risk of re-thrombosis within 30 min after successful thrombolysis []. To reduce the risk of re-thrombosis, yet to profit from the short half-life, the use of heparin post-interventionally is strongly suggested with close monitoring of aPTT [].
Finally, streptokinase was used to salvage free flaps in 14 cases, with 12 being successful. 20.000–125.000 units were administered for free-flap salvage (regular dose for arterial thrombosis: 250.000 IU as loading and 100.000 IU as maintenance over 6 h). Streptokinase indirectly uses the free plasminogen to be converted into plasmin, thereby initiating the lysis of blood clots within the vascular system. Due to the dual plasmin-activation, first, the fibrin bound and second, the unbound plasminogen, there are two half-lives. For fibrin-bound plasmin, it is about 11–13 min, and for unbound plasmin, it is about 80 min [,,,].
Within the streptokinase group, only small hematomas were recognized as adverse events from the application of the agent. One of the major advances seems to be the dual half-life of streptokinase, which might lead to reduced use of postoperative heparin and further reduce the risk of re-thrombosis compared with urokinase.
The quality of available data regarding the level of evidence is quite low. Most studies are either case reports or case series. Retrospective studies are typically large single-center flap analyses that also examine fibrinolysis, but they often do not focus on it explicitly. The topic of fibrinolysis, or flap salvage procedures, in general, is usually mentioned only briefly, with inadequate descriptions of adverse events, administration protocols, and dosages. Most crucially, data quality is insufficient to establish a clear link between interventions and possible outcomes, which makes it impractical to conduct a meta-analysis.
5. Conclusions
Although the occurrence of vascular compromise seems to be a rare event, it is crucial to act rapidly to successfully salvage the free flaps. In our systematic review, fibrinolytic agents such as tPA, urokinase, and streptokinase were used to salvage free flaps after the development of vascular compromise due to thrombosis.
These agents have proven to be safe and effective as salvage procedures when administered intra-arterially into the flap artery, with venous drainage branching off the regular vascular system.
Still, it has to be mentioned that most of the investigated literature consists of case reports and some case series, limiting the validity of this review. The retrospective nature of the literature with inconsistent documentation allows only a basic statement.
There seems to be a lack of prospective controlled studies. Future scientific endeavors should consider the flap type, time of occurrence of vascular compromise, which fibrinolytic agent was used, how it was administered, and how the dosage was determined. Finally, a statement should be presented if the salvage was successful or failed to salvage the flap.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.M., M.M. (Maximilian Moshammer) and A.H.; Methodology, M.M. (Maximilian Moshammer) and A.H.; validation, P.M., M.M. (Marcel Mayrhofer), R.W. and M.C.; formal analysis, M.S., R.W. and C.S.; investigation, P.M., M.M. (Maximilian Moshammer), A.H. and M.S.; data curation, M.M. (Maximilian Moshammer), M.M. (Marcel Mayrhofer) and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M. (Maximilian Moshammer), A.H. and C.S.; writing—review and editing, P.M. and M.M. (Maximilian Moshammer); supervision, M.S., L.P.K. and P.M.; project administration, P.M. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Due to copyright reasons, the data are not available.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Copelli, C.; Tewfik, K.; Cassano, L.; Pederneschi, N.; Catanzaro, S.; Manfuso, A.; Cocchi, R. Management of free flap failure in head and neck surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2017, 37, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Bengur, F.B.; Saadoun, R.; Moroni, E.A.M.; Khan, N.I.; Bottegal, M.T.B.; Sridharan, S.; Kubik, M.W.; Solari, M.G. Venous Thromboembolism Rates After Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck Region. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2023, 90 (Suppl. S5), S447–S451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Modarressi, A.; Schettini, A.V.; Rüegg, E.M.; Pittet-Cuénod, B. Venous thromboembolism events after breast reconstructions with DIEP free flaps in 192 consecutive case. Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 2018, 63, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Panchapakesan, V.; Addison, P.; Beausang, E.; Lipa, J.E.; Gilbert, R.W.; Neligan, P.C. Role of thrombolysis in free-flap salvage. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2003, 19, 523–529. [Google Scholar]
 - Kim, J.H.; Yoon, S.; Kwon, H.; Oh, D.Y.; Jun, Y.J.; Moon, S.H. Safe and effective thrombolysis in free flap salvage: Intra-arterial urokinase infusion. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0282908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Senchenkov, A.; Lemaine, V.; Tran, N.V. Management of perioperative microvascular thrombotic complications—The use of multiagent anticoagulation algorithm in 395 consecutive free flaps. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2015, 68, 1293–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Escandón, J.M.; Ciudad, P.; Mayer, H.F.; Pencek, M.; Mantilla-Rivas, E.; Mohammad, A.; Langstein, H.N.; Manrique, O.J. Free flap transfer with supermicrosurgical technique for soft tissue reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2023, 43, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Askari, M.; Fisher, C.; Weniger, F.G.; Bidic, S.; Lee, W.P.A. Anticoagulation therapy in microsurgery: A review. J. Hand Surg. 2006, 31, 836–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Smit, J.M.; Acosta, R.; Zeebregts, C.J.; Liss, A.G.; Anniko, M.; Hartman, E.H.M. Early reintervention of compromised free flaps improves success rate. Microsurgery 2007, 27, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Shen, A.Y.; Lonie, S.; Lim, K.; Farthing, H.; Hunter-Smith, D.J.; Rozen, W.M. Free Flap Monitoring, Salvage, and Failure Timing: A Systematic Review. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2021, 37, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Namgoong, S.; Yang, J.P.; Jeong, S.H.; Han, S.K.; Kim, W.K.; Dhong, E.S. Pharmacological thrombolysis: The last choice for salvaging free flaps. J. Plast. Surg. Hand Surg. 2018, 52, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Brouwers, K.; Kruit, A.S.; Hummelink, S.; Ulrich, D.J.O. Management of free flap salvage using thrombolytic drugs: A systematic review. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2020, 73, 1806–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Chang, E.I.; Mehrara, B.J.; Festekjian, J.H.; Da Lio, A.L.; Crisera, C.A. Vascular complications and microvascular free flap salvage: The role of thrombolytic agents. Microsurgery 2011, 31, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Barhoum, F.; Tschaikowsky, K.; Koch, M.; Kapsreiter, M.; Sievert, M.; Müller, S.; Goncalves, M.; Traxdorf, M.; Scherl, C. Successful free flap salvage surgery with off-label use of Alteplase: A case report, review of the literature and our free flap salvage algorithm. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 75, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Rinker, B.D.; Stewart, D.H.; Pu, L.L.Q.; Vasconez, H.C. Role of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in free flap salvage. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2007, 23, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009, 62, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - American Society of Plastic Surgeons ASPS Evidence Rating Scales. 2011. Available online: www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/medical-professionals/health-policy/evidence-practice/ASPS-Rating-Scale-March-2011.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2011).
 - Coriddi, M.; Myers, P.; Mehrara, B.; Nelson, J.; Cordeiro, P.G.; Disa, J.; Matros, E.; Dayan, J.; Allen, R.; McCarthy, C. Management of postoperative microvascular compromise and ischemia reperfusion injury in breast reconstruction using autologous tissue transfer: Retrospective review of 2103 flaps. Microsurgery 2022, 42, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Chang, E.I.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Yu, P.; Skoracki, R.J.; Hanasono, M.M. Analysis of risk factors for flap loss and salvage in free flap head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2016, 38, E771–E775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Casey, W.J.; Craft, R.O.; Rebecca, A.M.; Smith, A.A.; Yoon, S. Intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator: An effective adjunct following microsurgical venous thrombosis. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2007, 59, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Khansa, I.; Chao, A.H.; Taghizadeh, M.; Nagel, T.; Wang, D.; Tiwari, P. A systematic approach to emergent breast free flap takeback: Clinical outcomes, algorithm, and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2013, 33, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Mirzabeigi, M.N.; Wang, T.; Kovach, S.J.; Taylor, J.A.; Serletti, J.M.; Wu, L.C. Free flap take-back following postoperative microvascular compromise: Predicting salvage versus failure. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012, 130, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Bui, D.T.; Cordeiro, P.G.; Hu, Q.Y.; Disa, J.J.; Pusic, A.; Mehrara, B.J. Free flap reexploration: Indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007, 119, 2092–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Yii, N.W.; Evans, G.R.D.; Miller, M.J.; Reece, G.P.; Langstein, H.; Chang, D.; Kroll, S.S.; Wang, B.; Robb, G.L. Thrombolytic Therapy: What Is Its Role in Free Flap Salvage? Ann. Plast. Surg. 2001, 46, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Largo, R.D.; Selber, J.C.; Garvey, P.B.; Chang, E.I.; Hanasono, M.M.; Yu, P.; Butler, C.E.; Baumann, D.P. Outcome Analysis of Free Flap Salvage in Outpatients Presenting with Microvascular Compromise. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018, 141, 20e–27e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Serletti, J.M.; Moran, S.L.; Orlando, G.S.; O’Connor, T.; Herrera, H.R. Urokinase protocol for free-flap salvage following prolonged venous thrombosis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998, 102, 1947–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Tall, J.; Björklund, T.C.; Skogh, A.C.D.; Arnander, C.; Halle, M. Vascular complications after radiotherapy in head and neck free flap reconstruction: Clinical outcome related to vascular biology. In Annals of Plastic Surgery; Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 309–315. [Google Scholar]
 - Nelson, J.A.; Fischer, J.P.; Grover, R.; Kovach, S.J.; Low, D.W.; Kanchwala, S.K.; Levin, L.S.; Serletti, J.M.; Wu, L.C. Vein grafting your way out of trouble: Examining the utility and efficacy of vein grafts in microsurgery. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2015, 68, 830–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Nelson, J.A.; Kim, E.M.; Eftakhari, K.; Low, D.W.; Kovach, S.J.; Wu, L.C.; Serletti, J.M. Late venous thrombosis in free flap breast reconstruction: Strategies for salvage after this real entity. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012, 129, 8e–15e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Bishop, J.L.; Vasudev, M.; Garcia, N.; Heslop, G.; Pham, T.T.; Hicks, M.D.; Chowdhury, F.; Grayson, J.W.; Goddard, J.A.; Tjoa, T.; et al. Effect of Perioperative Antithrombotics on Head and Neck Microvascular Free Flap Survival After Anastomotic Revision. Otolaryngol.—Head Neck Surg. 2023, 168, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Selber, J.C.; Soto-Miranda, M.A.; Liu, J.; Robb, G. The survival curve: Factors impacting the outcome of free flap take-backs. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012, 130, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Vijan, S.S.; Tran, N.V. Microvascular breast reconstruction pedicle thrombosis: How long can we wait? Microsurgery 2007, 27, 544–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Ihler, F.; Matthias, C.; Canis, M. Free flap salvage with subcutaneous injection of tissue plasminogen activator in head and neck patients. Microsurgery 2013, 33, 478–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Anavekar, N.S.; Lim, E.; Johnston, A.; Findlay, M.; Hunter-Smith, D.J. Minimally invasive late free flap salvage: Indications, efficacy and implications for reconstructive microsurgeons. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2011, 64, 1517–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Trussler, A.P.; Watson, J.P.; Crisera, C.A. Late free-flap salvage with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Microsurgery 2008, 28, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Egozi, D.; Fodor, L.; Ullmann, Y. Salvage of compromised free flaps in trauma cases with combined modalities. Microsurgery 2011, 31, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Weinzweig, N.; Gonzalez, M. Free tissue failure is not an all-or-none phenomenon. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1995, 96, 648–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lyons, A.J.; James, R.; Collyer, J. Free vascularised iliac crest graft: An audit of 26 consecutive cases. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2005, 43, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Tamplen, M.; Blackwell, K.; Jahan, R.; Nabili, V. Salvage of free-flaps in vessel-depleted mandibular osteoradionecrosis cases using catheter-directed thrombolysis and angioplasty. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2013, 29, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
 - Goldberg, J.A.; Pederson, W.C.; Barwick, W.J. Salvage of free tissue transfers using thrombolytic agents. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 1989, 5, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - D’Arpa, S.; Cordova, A.; Moschella, F. Pharmacological thrombolysis: One more weapon for free-flap salvage. Microsurgery 2005, 25, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Bonde, C.T.; Heslet, L.; Jansen, E.; Elberg, J.J. Salvage of free flaps after venous thrombosis: Case report. Microsurgery 2004, 24, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Tessler, O.; Vorstenbosch, J.; Jones, D.; Lalonde, S.; Zadeh, T. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis as an under-diagnosed cause of flap failure in heparin-naive patients: A case report and systematic review of the literature. Microsurgery 2014, 34, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Schubert, W.; Hunter, D.W.; Guzman-Stein, G.; Ahrenholz, D.H.; Solem, L.D.; Dressel, T.D.; Cunningham, B.L. Use of streptokinase for the salvage of a free flap: Case report and review of the use of thrombolytic therapy. Microsurgery 1987, 8, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Atiyeh, B.S.; Fuleihan, N.S.; Musharafieh, R.S. Pharmacologic partial salvage of a failing free flap with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 1999, 15, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Lee, D.S.; Jung SIl Kim, D.W.; Dhong, E.S. Anterograde intra-arterial urokinase injection for salvaging fibular free flap. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2013, 40, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Zhang, S.L.; Ng, H.W. Primary thrombolysis for free flap surgery in head and neck reconstruction: A case report and review. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2021, 48, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Hong, S.H.; Lee, K.T.; Pyon, J.K. Salvage of late flap compromise in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: To revise or not to revise. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2020, 47, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Renaud, F.; Succo, E.; Alessi, M.C.; Legre, R.; Juhan-Vague, I. Iloprost and salvage of a free flap. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1996, 49, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Malhotra, G.; Patil, R.; Komma, V.N.R. Use of Tissue Plasminogen Activator to Salvage a Precious Free Tissue Transfer. J. Hand Microsurg. 2022, 14, 184–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Hsu, S.Y.; Cheng, H.T.; Manrique, O.; Hsu, Y.C. Anterograde injection of low-dose urokinase salvages free anterolateral thigh flap. Medicine 2017, 96, e7932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Fudem, G.M.; Walton, R.L. Microvascular thrombolysis to salvage a free flap using human recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 1989, 5, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Wimbauer, J.M.; Heinrich, K.M.; Schwaiger, K.; Pumberger, P.; Koeninger, F.; Wechselberger, G.; Russe, E. Anterograde Injection of Alteplase Salvages Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap in Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2022, 10, E4415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Lipton, H.A.; Jupiter, J.B. Streptokinase salvage of a free-tissue transfer: Case report and review of the literature. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1987, 79, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Agostini, T.; Lazzeri, D.; Agostini, V.; Spinelli, G.; Shokrollahi, K. Delayed free flap salvage after venous thrombosis. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2012, 23, e260–e261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Chan, R.K.; Mathy, J.A.; Przylecki, W.; Guo, L.; Caterson, S.A. CASE REPORT Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Salvage Following Late Venous Congestion after Discharge. Eplasty 2010, 10, e63. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
 - Coeugniet, E.; Al Yafi, M.N.; Lafrance, D.; Danino, M.A.; Soulez, G.; Nguyen, Q.; Harris, P. Microcirculatory Free Flap Failure with Patent Anastomosis Salvaged by in Situ Thrombolysis in Vulnerable Phase Burn. J. Burn. Care Res. 2019, 40, 718–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Ayhan, S.; Uygur, S.; Kucukoduk, I.; Sencan, A. Salvage of a congested DIEAP flap with subcutaneous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2009, 62, e453–e454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Tran, N.V.; Bishop, A.T.; Convery, P.A.; Yu, A.Y. Venous congestive flap salvage with subcutaneous rtPA. Microsurgery 2006, 26, 370–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Tse, R.; Ross, D.; Gan, B.S. Late salvage of a free TRAM flap. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2003, 56, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Handschin, A.E.; Guggenheim, M.; Calcagni, M.; Künzi, W.; Giovanoli, P. Factor v leiden mutation and thrombotic occlusion of microsurgical anastomosis after free TRAM flap. Clin. Appl. Thromb./Hemost. 2010, 16, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Wechselberger, G.; Schoeller, T.; Ohler, K.; Anderl, H.; Ninkovic, M. Flap salvage in a “flow-through” flap by manual thrombectomy plus thrombolytic therapy abstract. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 1998, 14, 127–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Cangé, S.; Laberge, L.C.; Rivard, G.E.; Garel, L. Streptokinase in the management of limb arterial thrombosis following free-flap surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1987, 79, 974–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Tonks, A.M.; Rees, M. Streptokinase salvage of a rectus abdominis free flap. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1995, 95, 933–934. [Google Scholar]
 - Noordanus, R.P.; Joris Hage, J. Late salvage of a “free flap” phalloplasty: A case report. Microsurgery 1993, 14, 599–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Nikkhah, D.; Green, B.; Sapountzis, S.; Gilleard, O.; Sidhu, A.; Blackburn, A. Resurrection of an ALT flap with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and heparin. Eur. J. Plast. Surg. 2016, 39, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Collen, D. Molecular mechanism of action of newer thrombolytic agents. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1987, 10 (Suppl. SB), 11B–15B. [Google Scholar]
 - Ohman, E.M.; Harrington, R.A.; Cannon, C.P.; Agnelli, G.; Cairns, J.A.; Kennedy, J.W. Intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Chest 2001, 119, 253S–277S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Hepburn-Brown, M.; Darvall, J.; Hammerschlag, G. Acute pulmonary embolism: A concise review of diagnosis and management. Intern. Med. J. 2019, 49, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Maizel, A.S.; Bookstein, J.J. Streptokinase, urokinase, and tissue plasminogen activator: Pharmacokinetics, relative advantages, and methods for maximizing rates and consistency of lysis. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 1986, 9, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Khan, I.A.; Gowda, R.M. Clinical perspectives and therapeutics of thrombolysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2003, 91, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Goodman Gilman, A.; Hardman, J.G.; Limbird, L.E.; Molinoff, P.B.; Ruddon, R.W. Goodman and Gilman’s the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics; Hardman, J.G., Limberd, L.E., Eds.-in-Chief; Molinoff, P.B., Ruddon, R.W., Eds.; Goodman Gilman, A., Consulting Ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 1493–1495. Available online: https://unov.tind.io/record/68258 (accessed on 29 April 2024).
 
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.  | 
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).