Next Article in Journal
Progressions in Cardiac Arrhythmia: Specific Populations and the Need for Precision Medicine
Next Article in Special Issue
Immune Biomarkers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving the Predictivity of Current Testing Methods
Previous Article in Journal
A New Prognostic Instrument for Predicting the Probability of Completion of Cisplatin during Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of Low-Frequency KRAS Mutation Detection in Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Incidence and Patterns of Digestive Organ Cancer in Georgia: Insights from a Population-Based Registry Study in 2021

J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(7), 1121; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071121
by Miranda Nonikashvili 1,*, Maia Kereselidze 1,2, Otar Toidze 1 and Tina Beruchashvili 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(7), 1121; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13071121
Submission received: 10 June 2023 / Revised: 2 July 2023 / Accepted: 4 July 2023 / Published: 10 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Biomarkers and Therapy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Purpose of the study and its clinical relevance with the patient population can be improved.

Tumors just based location without histological subtypes gives little benefit, can histological subtypes be added ?

No reference given for type of hepatitis infection in Georgia.

Discussion and Conclusion can be improved by discussing reasons for the results.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the privilege of reviewing your work. This manuscript is well written. I think the manuscript needs a little more consideration.

 

1.      The authors must add the limitation.

2.      Why did pancreatic cancer show a higher prevalence aged 49?

3.      Please describe the reason for the differences in incidence in Georgia compared to other countries and in urban areas compared to in rural areas in more detail.

4.      What were the strengths of this paper?

 

English is well written

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors adequately revised the manuscript. I have no further comments.

Back to TopTop