Next Article in Journal
Early-Stage Detection of Ovarian Cancer Based on Clinical Data Using Machine Learning Approaches
Next Article in Special Issue
Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Gene Expression and Methylation Analysis of Melanoma in TCGA Database to Further Study the Expression Pattern of KYNU in Melanoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of Fibula Free Flaps: A Retrospective Comparison of CAD/CAM versus Conventional Technique
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Prospective Evaluation of Intraorbital Soft Tissue Atrophy after Posttraumatic Bone Reconstruction: A Risk Factor for Enophthalmos

J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(8), 1210; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081210
by Cristian Dinu, Tiberiu Tamas *, Gabriela Agrigoroaei, Sebastian Stoia, Horia Opris, Simion Bran, Gabriel Armencea and Avram Manea
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(8), 1210; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081210
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 24 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for your great manuscript about " Prospective evaluation of intraorbital soft tissue atrophy after posttraumatic bone reconstruction: a risk factor for enopthalmos".

This manuscript shows evaluating the orbital soft tissue after postraumatic reconstruction of the orbital walls fractures.

It's valuable to readers for prediction volumetric changes in posttraumatic orbital fractures.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your help in reviewing our paper and for your quick response.

Kind regards,

Tiberiu Tamas

Reviewer 2 Report

Very nice paper. I would try to describe the method of how you calculated the volume in more simpler terms. Description is a little confusing to read.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

I would like to thank you for your help in reviewing our paper and for your quick response. We tried to simplify the description of the method as you recomended. You can find attached the modified version of the article. Thank you again for your review and recommendations! If you consider other things that we should modify, please let me know!

Kind regards,

Tiberiu Tamas

Back to TopTop